Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Aug 30;6:32395. doi: 10.1038/srep32395

Introducing Mg-4Zn-3Gd-1Ca/ZnO nanocomposite with compressive strengths matching/exceeding that of mild steel

Y Chen 1, S Tekumalla 1, Y B Guo 1, M Gupta 1,a
PMCID: PMC5004110  PMID: 27572903

Abstract

This work introduces Mg-4Zn-3Gd-1Ca/2ZnO (wt.%) nanocomposite fabricated using the technique of disintegrated melt deposition and extrusion. Addition of ZnO nanoparticles enhanced the compressive strengths of alloy by ~100 MPa. Nanocomposite samples display high strength and good ductility: 0.2% compressive yield stress of 355 MPa, ultimate compressive stress of 703 MPa, and compressive failure strain of 10.6%. The significant enhancement of compressive yield stress is mainly attributed to the grain refinement by adding nanoparticles. The strength levels exceed that of commercial magnesium alloys (i.e. WE43, WE54, ZK60, and ME21) and mild steels (i.e. S275 and S355), making Mg-4Zn-3Gd-1Ca/2ZnO a very promising material for multiple engineering and biomedical applications.

Magnesium is the lightest structural metal – only two thirds the density of aluminum. The light weight of Mg and its alloys endows them with tremendous potential for weight reduction in transportation sector including reduction in green house emission and energy consumption. However, the low strength and poor ductility at room temperature of Mg alloys hinder their engineering applications. Adding rare earth (RE) elements into Mg is one effective way to improve mechanical properties1. The extruded alloy Mg-1Zn-2.5Gd (at.%) reported by Yamasaki et al.2 exhibited a good balance of tensile yield strength (345 MPa) and elongation (6.9%) due to refined grains and well dispersed long period stacking ordered (LPSO) phase. Rolled Mg-1Zn-Gd (2 and 3 wt.% for Gd) sheet studied by Wu et al.3 displayed a high tensile failure strain (~50%) as a result of texture weakening by adding Gd. Addition of Ca element into Mg alloys can also improve strength effectively through grain refinement. Extruded Mg-5.25Zn-0.6Ca (wt.%) alloys presented by Tong et al.4 and Mg-1.8Zn-0.3Ca (at.%) presented by Somekawa and Mukai5 showed good tensile yield strength (~300MPa) with ultrafine grains. Recently, work done by Wen et al.6 showed that with increasing the amount of Ca element (0–1 wt.%), the ultimate tensile strength of extruded Mg-4Zn-2Gd-Ca alloys increased. With increase of Gd addition (0–2.52 wt.%), the creep properties of as-cast Mg-3.8Zn-2.2Ca-Gd alloys were improved7. However, reports on alloy Mg-Zn-Gd-Ca and compressive properties are extremely limited4.

Addition of nano-size reinforcements to Mg alloys is another effective way to improve the mechanical properties beyond that of alloying elements. Studies by Nguyen et al.8 and Chen et al.9 demonstrated that addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles into AZ31 improved tensile ductility and strength simultaneously, while the compressive strength was also enhanced. Similar results were reported for adding ZnO nanoparticles to Mg matrix10.

In literature, some studies11,12 estimated that the transition from twinning to slip may happen when the grain size of magnesium alloy is smaller than 3 μm. However, the results from work by Li et al.13 for AZ60 with grain size of 0.8 μm and work by Chen et al.14 for AZ31-based nanocomposite with grain size of 1.5 μm, showed that tension twinning remained the predominant deformation mode for the initial plastic flow under uniaxial compression. Results that are available in open literature remain contradictory. Thus, it needs further research work. Accordingly, the present study investigates the effect of addition of ZnO nanoparticles in a new Mg-Zn-Gd-Ca alloy emphasizing particularly on the compressive response.

Results

Compressive mechanical properties and microstructure

Figure 1(a) shows typical engineering stress-strain plots of three materials subjected to quasi-static compression. Compressive mechanical properties and grain size of three materials studied are given in Table 1. Compared to pure Mg, the alloy Mg4Zn3Gd1Ca exhibits high strength and good ductility: 0.2% compressive yield stress σYS of 260 MPa, ultimate compressive stress σUCS of 585 MPa and failure strain εFS of 12.6%. The 0.2% compressive yield stress of the alloy is almost 3.5 times that of pure Mg. Furthermore, addition of 2 wt.% ZnO nanoparticle into the alloy enhanced the strength by ~100 MPa; σYS of 355 MPa, σUCS of 703 MPa were obtained. In addition, failure strain of the nanocomposite is 10.6%, only slightly lesser than that of the alloy. It indicates that addition of nanoparticles can maintain the ductility of the alloy, while it increases strength significantly. Figure 2 presents the comparison of compressive mechanical properties of the materials in this study and the extruded Mg alloys in literature; Table 1 gives the corresponding specific values. The compressive yield stress of mild steel S275 and S355 is also given in Table 1. It is evident that with a comparable elongation, the nanocomposite Mg4Zn3Gd1Ca-2ZnO exhibits significant higher strength than other extruded Mg alloys shown in Fig. 2, and the compressive yield strength levels either matches or surpasses that of mild steel.

Figure 1. Mechanical properties and grain morphology.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Engineering stress-strain curves for compression on three materials; (b) FESEM image for grain morphology of the nanocomposite.

Table 1. Compressive mechanical properties and grain size of three materials in this study and other materials in literature.

Materials Compressive yieldstress (MPa) UCS (MPa) FS (%) Grain size (μm)
Mg 75.2 ± 3.6 335.4 ± 13.8 25.6 ± 2.2 24.6 ± 4.0
Mg4Zn3Gd1Ca 260.5 ± 2.9 585.4 ± 18.9 12.6 ± 0.3 1.42 ± 0.20
Mg4Zn3Gd1Ca-ZnO 355.4 ± 5.0 703.4 ± 39.8 10.6 ± 0.4 0.91 ± 0.47
ME2115 (extruded) 87 260 25 NR
ZK6016 (extruded) 159 472 12.4 NR
WE4317 (extruded) 183 305 11.3 NR
WE5415 (extruded) 210 325 27 NR
S27518 (≤16 mm plate) 275 NR NR NR
S35518 (≤16 mm plate) 355 NR NR NR
Open in a new tab

*NR denotes not reported.

Figure 2. Comparison of compressive properties of the materials in this study and in literature.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Compressive yield stress against elongation; (b) ultimate compressive stress against elongation.

Compared to pure Mg, significant grain refinement was observed in the alloy Mg4Zn3Gd1Ca. The grain size reduces from 24. 6 μm for Mg to 1.42 μm for the alloy. Further reduction of grain size was achieved by addition of ZnO nanoparticle – grain size of the nanocomposite is ~0.9 μm, ~60% that of the alloy, as shown in Fig. 1(b).

XRD results

Two types of specimens of three materials – before compression and after yielding (at a strain of 2%) – were subjected to XRD scanning. The results for the nanocomposite are given in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3(a), corresponding to the basal plane (0002), the highest density peak is observed for scanning along the extrusion direction and the negligible density peak for scanning perpendicular to the extrusion direction. This indicates that specimens of the nanocomposite have a typical basal texture, as commonly observed for the extruded magnesium-based material. In Fig. 3(b), after yielding (at a strain of 2%), significant increment of peak density for the basal plane (0002) is observed for scanning perpendicular to the extrusion direction. This is attributed to activation of Inline graphic tension twinning, because this twinning mode can rotate the grain lattice by ~90o. The fraction of basal plane perpendicular to the extrusion direction can be expected to increase with activation of this twinning mode. In addition, the low strain hardening for the initial plastic flow, as highlighted by the circle in Fig. 1, also indicates the activation of Inline graphic tension twinning. Therefore, although the nanocomposite has ultrafine grains (~0.9 μm), tension twinning still plays a dominant role in the initial stage of plastic flow. Similar XRD results were obtained for the alloy and pure Mg. For brevity, these XRD spectrums are not presented.

Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of the nanocomposite.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Before compression; (b) after yielding (at a strain of 2%). (ED: extrusion direction).

Discussion

The well-known Hall-Petch relation19 defines the relationship between grain size and yield stress for polycrystalline materials as follows:

graphic file with name srep32395-m3.jpg

where σ is the 0.2% yield stress; σ0 is a material constant, k the strengthening coefficient and d is the grain size. Figure 4 shows the relationship of σ and d−1/2 for Mg-based materials. All materials in the figure were fabricated by DMD method and extruded with the same extrusion ratio (20.25:1).

Figure 4. Hall-Petch Relation.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Plots of compressive yield stress against inverse of square root of grain size for Mg-based materials synthesized by DMD method.

The red marks, from the left bottom corner to the right up corner, denote respectively: pure Mg, Mg reinforced with ZnO nanoparticles10, Mg added with alloying elements – Zn and Gd20, Mg added with alloying elements – Zn, Gd and Ca, and Mg containing both alloying elements – Zn, Gd and Ca, and ZnO nanoparticles. All the data fitted very well into a linear line because the value of fitting parameter R-square is 0.97. In Fig. 4, several salient points can be noted: (1) significant enhancement (~100 MPa) of yield stress by addition of ZnO nanoparticles is mainly due to grain refinement; (2) as discussed for Fig. 3, when the grain size reduces to 0.9 μm, tension twinning still plays a predominant role for yield stress. That is to say, the activation stress of tension twinning follows Hall-Petch relation even when the grain is significantly refined; (3) the blue squares in Fig. 4 denote results for Mg Alloy AZ31 and its nanocomposites14, which is reinforced by Al2O3 nanoparticles. It is apparent that the yield stress of these materials follows Hall-Petch relation, as indicated by the blue linear fitting line. However, the slope (or the strengthening coefficient k) of the blue line is much smaller than that of the red line. It means that the combination of alloy elements – Zn and Gd, generates much higher slope than that of Zn and Al. This notable contrast demonstrates that alloying elements display varied strengthening effect on the activation stress of tension twinning. The fundamental mechanism for the discrepancy needs further investigation.

In summary, an alloy Mg4Zn3Gd1Ca and its nanocomposite Mg4Zn3Gd1Ca-2ZnO were synthesized by DMD method followed by hot extrusion. Addition of 2 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles into the alloy generates significant strength enhancement – i.e. ~100 MPa, and maintains good ductility; σYS of 355 MPa, σUCS of 703 MPa and εFS of 10.6% were obtained. Significant increment in strength by adding ZnO nanoparticles is mainly attributed to its grain refinement effect. The XRD results and compressive stress-strain curves demonstrate that at initial stage of plastic flow, tension twinning plays a predominant role for the ultrafine-grained nanocomposite. Superior-performance nanocomposite presented in this study has the capability to replace commercial magnesium alloys and certain mild steels when compressive strength is the material selection criterion.

Methods

Materials synthesis

An alloy Mg-4Zn-3Gd-1Ca (wt.%) and its nanocomposite Mg-4Zn-3Gd-1Ca-2ZnO (ZnO nanoparticle with diameters in 90–200 nm) were synthesized by a disintegrated melt deposition (DMD) technique9, which includes melting, mixing, disintegrating and deposition steps. Pure Mg, as a reference, was synthesized using the same technique. The cast ingots with 36 mm in diameter and 45 mm in length were homogenized at 400 °C for 4 hours and extruded at 300 °C into 8 mm diameter rods.

Mechanical testing and microstructure characterization

The 6 mm diameter cylinder specimens with a length-to-diameter ratio of 1, were prepared for room temperature uniaxial compression tests at a strain rate of 5 × 10−3 s−1, using an Instron 8874 universal testing machine. An extensometer was used to measure plastic deformation. Three specimens were tested for each material. The microstructures of three materials were observed using an Olympus optical microscope and a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out on specimens before compression and after yielding, using an automated Shimadzu Lab-X XRD-6000 diffractometer (Cu Kα, λ = 1.54056 Ǻ) operating at a scanning speed of 2 deg/min. The specimens were etched with a mixture of 1 g oxalic, 1 ml nitric acid, 1 ml acetic acid and 150 ml distilled water.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chen, Y. et al. Introducing Mg-4Zn-3Gd-1Ca/ZnO nanocomposite with compressive strengths matching/exceeding that of mild steel. Sci. Rep. 6, 32395; doi: 10.1038/srep32395 (2016).

Acknowledgments

The financial support of Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Funding (WBS# R-265-000-498-112) is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Author Contributions S.T. and Y.C. fabricated the materials and did microstructure observation under supervision of M.G. XRD testing was done by Y.C.; sample fabrication and mechanical testing were conducted by Y.B.G. and Y.C., and supervised by M.G. All authors commented on the manuscript.

References

  1. Emley E. F. Principles of magnesium technology. (Oxford, New York, Pergamon Press, 1966). [Google Scholar]
  2. Yamasaki M., Anan T., Yoshimoto S. & Kawamura Y. Mechanical properties of warm-extruded Mg-Zn-Gd alloy with coherent 14H long periodic stacking ordered structure precipitate. Scr. Mater. 53, 799–803 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  3. Wu D., Chen R. S. & Han E. H. Excellent room-temperature ductility and formability of rolled Mg-Gd-Zn alloy sheets. J. Alloys Compd. 509, 2856–2863 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  4. Tong L. B. et al. Room-temperature compressive deformation behavior of Mg-Zn-Ca alloy processed by equal channel angular pressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 672–679 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. Somekawa H. & Mukai T. High strength and fracture toughness balance on the extruded Mg-Ca-Zn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 459, 366–370 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  6. Wen Q., Deng K. K., Shi J. Y., Zhang B. P. & Liang W. Effect of Ca addition on the microstructure and tensile properties of Mg-4.0Zn-2.0Gd alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 609, 1–6 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang M., Guo T. & Li H. Effects of Gd addition on as-cast microstructure, tensile and creep properties of Mg-3.8 Zn-2.2Ca (wt%) magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 587, 132–142 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. Nguyen Q. & Gupta M. Enhancing compressive response of AZ31B magnesium alloy using alumina nanoparticulates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2185–2192 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen Y., Guo Y. B., Gupta M. & Shim V. P. W. Dynamic tensile response of magnesium nanocomposites and the effect of nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 582, 359–367 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. Sankaranarayanan S. et al. Nano-ZnO particle addition to monolithic magnesium for enhanced tensile and compressive response. J. Alloys Compd. 615, 211–219 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. Meyers M. A., Vohringer O. & Lubarda V. A. The onset of twinning in metals: a constitutive description. Acta Mater 49, 4025–4039 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang Q. & Ghosh a. K. Deformation behavior of ultrafine-grain (UFG) AZ31B Mg alloy at room temperature. Acta Mater. 54, 5159–5170 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  13. Li B. et al. Rate-dependent hardening due to twinning in an ultrafine-grained magnesium alloy. Acta Mater. 60, 1818–1826 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Y., Guo Y. B., Gupta M. & Shim V. P. W. A study of the dynamic compressive response of AZ31/Al2O3 nanocomposites and the influence of nanoparticles. Int. J. Impact Eng. 89, 114–123 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. Lentz M. et al. Analysis of the Deformation Behavior of Magnesium-Rare Earth Alloys Mg-2 pct Mn-1 pct Rare Earth and Mg-5 pct Y-4 pct Rare Earth by In Situ Energy-Dispersive X-ray Synchrotron Diffraction and Elasto-Plastic Self-Consistent Modeling. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45, 5721–5735 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiong Y., Yu Q. & Jiang Y. An experimental study of cyclic plastic deformation of extruded ZK60 magnesium alloy under uniaxial loading at room temperature. Int. J. Plast. 53, 107–124 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. Available at: http://www.magnesium-elektron.com/sites/default/files/Elektron-43-Extruded Products.pdf.
  18. EN10025:2004 European Hot-Rolled Structural Steel Standard (2004).
  19. Petch N. J. The Cleavage Strength of Polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst 174, 25–28 (1953). [Google Scholar]
  20. Seetharaman S. et al. Microstructure And Mechanical Properties New Magnesium- Zinc-Gadolinium Alloys. Magnes. Technol. 2016 159–163 doi: 10.1002/9781119274803.ch32 (2016). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES