Abstract
Vertebrate genomes are highly methylated at cytosine residues in CpG sequences. CpG methylation plays an important role in epigenetic gene silencing and genome stability. Compared with other epigenetic modifications, CpG methylation is thought to be relatively stable; however, it is sometimes affected by environmental changes, leading to epigenetic instability and disease. CpG methylation is reversible and regulated by DNA methyltransferases and demethylases including ten-eleven translocation. Here, we discuss CpG methylation instability and the regulation of CpG methylation by DNA methyltransferases and ten-eleven translocation in pluripotent stem cells.
Keywords: CpG methylation, CRISPR/Cas, DNA methyltransferase, Embryonic stem cells, Ten-eleven translocation
In vertebrate genomic DNA, the cytosine residues at the fifth position in CpG sequences are often methylated [1]. Most CpG sequences are located in nongenic repeated sequences, whereas some CpGs are located in the promoter regions of housekeeping genes and tissue-specific genes, where they regulate gene expression [2,3,4]. Although there are some methods for controlling gene expression, CpG methylation is one of the epigenetic hallmarks determining chromatin structure and controlling gene expression. The mechanism by which CpG methylation represses gene expression is not completely understood; however, several molecular mechanisms have been suggested, including blockage of transcription factor binding, recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) via methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins (e.g., MeCP2, MBD1, and MBD2), recruitment of heterochromatin proteins (e.g., HP1), and transcription of non-coding RNA (e.g., Xist) [5,6,7].
In the past two decades, researchers have clearly demonstrated that CpG methylation plays a very important role in the normal development of mammalian embryos by regulating gene expression through genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, and genomic stabilization [8,9,10,11,12]. Because CpG methylation is more stably maintained than chromatin modifications, CpG methylation is observed in imprinted genes, transposons, and the inactive X chromosome, which require long-term silencing throughout development and life. However, CpG methylation is reversible, sometimes changing during embryonic development and differentiation, and is even affected by environmental changes. Supplementation of the maternal diet with genistein (the major phytoestrogen in soy) in mice during gestation shifts the coat color of heterozygous viable yellow agouti (Avy/a) offspring toward pseudoagouti [13]. This marked phenotypic change is associated with increased methylation by in utero dietary genistein at six CpG sites in a retrotransposon upstream of the transcription start site of the Agouti gene. In addition, numerous studies have evaluated altered CpG methylation, which causes several diseases. For instance, the most representative disease, cancer, often shows undesired gene silencing in tumor suppressor genes because of CpG hypermethylation.
Therefore, it is important to understand the role of molecules that write, maintain, and erase CpG methylation. It has been reported that DNA methyltranseferases (Dnmts) function as methylation writers and maintainers, and ten-eleven translocation (Tet) acts as a methylation eraser (Fig. 1). Regulation of DNA methylation has been widely examined in pluripotent stem cells, including embryonic stem cells (ESCs). In this review, we discuss the regulation of CpG methylation by the Dnmt and Tet proteins in pluripotent stem cells.
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagrams of Dnmt and Tet proteins in mice. A. Dnmts contain an N-terminal regulatory domain and C-terminal catalytic domain. The catalytic domain of each contains conserved methyltransferase motifs (Roman numerals). The regulatory motifs differ between maintenance- and de novo-type methyltransferases. These regions control protein interactions as well as targeting. Cys-rich refers to the cysteine rich motif in Dnmt1. B. Tet proteins contain two conserved domains, the Cys-rich domain and the dioxygenase domain. Tet1 and Tet3 contain the CXXC domain in their N-termini, but the Tet2 CXXC domain has been lost during evolution. The numbers represent the amino acid numbers.
DNA Methyltransferase (Dnmt)
Maintenance- and de novo-type DNA methyltransferase activity have been reported in vertebrates. Maintenance-type Dnmt1, which shows a preference for hemi-methylated DNA, faithfully maintains the methylation state during cell division [14,15,16,17]. In contrast, two other DNA methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, are responsible for the creation of new methylation patterns during the early stages of embryogenesis and possess de novo-type DNA methylation activity [18, 19]. Both Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b contain an N-terminal regulatory domain that includes the PWWP and plant homeodomain (PHD) and a C-terminal catalytic domain with highly conserved motifs (I, IV, VI, VIII, IX, and X) (Fig. 1A). Although Dnmt3L shares homology with Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, it lacks intrinsic DNA methyltransferase activity [20]. Dnmt3L physically associates with Dnmt3a and possibly with Dnmt3b to increase methylation efficiency and plays a critical role in germ cells [21,22,23,24]. Dnmt2 contains the complete sequence motifs as DNA cytosine-methyltransferases, but do not have global de novo or maintenance methylation activity for DNA [25].
According to gene targeting experiments in mice, Dnmt1 and Dnmt3b knockout (KO) mice show embryonic lethality and Dnmt3a KO mice show postnatal lethality at 4–8 weeks [16, 19]. In contrast, Dnmt3L is not essential for embryonic development but is necessary for the establishment of methylation imprints in gametes [21]. The phenotype of Dnmt3a conditional KO mice in germ cells is indistinguishable from that of Dnmt3L KO mice, indicating that both Dnmt3a and Dnmt3L are essential for the methylation of imprinted loci in germ cells [26].
Ten-eleven Translocation (Tet)
Numerous studies have evaluated the methylating machinery, including Dnmts, but few studies have examined the mechanisms of demethylation and the major players. Although several CpG demethylation factors have been reported previously, most studies were not conclusive [27, 28]. Currently, major active demethylation is thought to be mediated by the ten-eleven translocation (Tet) family of proteins, which was recently identified as a new family of enzymes [29]. All three Tet proteins, Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3, contain a C-terminal 2-oxoglutarate- and Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenase domain (Fig. 1B). This dioxygenase domain catalyzes the hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and the subsequent generation of 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC), both of which are removed by thymine DNA glycosylase and base excision repair [30,31,32] (Fig. 2). As a result, the Tet-mediated oxidation pathway followed by thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG)-base excision repair (BER) leads to active demethylation of 5mC. In contrast, 5hmC cannot be recognized by Dnmt1 during DNA replication [33]; therefore, the conversion of 5mC to 5hmC inhibits the maintenance of existing DNA methylation patterns, leading to passive demethylation in proliferating cells. Tet1 and Tet3 contain another conserved domain, an N-terminal CXXC zinc finger domain with high affinity for clustered unmethylated CpG. While Tet2 lost this motif during evolution, the CXXC domain that was previously a part of Tet2 now exists as a different gene called IDAX/CXXC4 [34].
Fig. 2.
Regulation of DNA methylation and demethylation by Dnmts and Tets. C, cytosine; 5mC, 5-methylcytosine; 5hmC, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine; 5fC, 5-formylcytosine; 5caC, 5-carboxylcytosine.
Experiments using KO mice showed that a homozygous mutation in Tet3 leads to neonatal lethality mainly because paternal genome conversion of 5mC into 5hmC fails to occur in early embryos [35]. In contrast, Tet1 and Tet2 KO mice are viable [36]; however, Tet1 KO significantly reduces female germ cell numbers and fertility [37]. Moreover, Tet1 and Tet2 are necessary to erase methylation imprints in primordial germ cells [38,39,40,41].
Instability of DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells
We previously reported the instability of CpG methylation in mouse preimplantation embryos. For example, blastocyst-stage embryos derived from in vitro fertilized zygotes or parthenogenetically activated oocytes showed a significant loss of CpG methylation in major and minor satellite repeats or in differentially methylated regions of several imprinted genes [42, 43]. This hypomethylation may be caused by artificial treatment, such as superovulation [44] and in vitro culture [45]. ESCs are established from the inner cell mass of blastocyst-stage embryos [46, 47]; therefore, altered DNA methylation in blastocysts may affect the CpG methylation status of their derivative ESCs. In fact, CpG methylation differences between in vitro- and in vivo-derived blastocysts are inherited by ESCs at early passages [48]. In contrast, epigenetic differences are lost during prolonged culture of these ESCs, and an epigenetic drift in each ESC line was preferentially observed [48, 49]. We found that ESCs derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos also exhibited more dramatic epigenetic changes during long-term culture in vitro [49]. The epigenetic drift in these ESCs may be partially caused by small molecules contained in the ESC culture medium. For example, vitamin C, which is abundant in KnockOutTM Serum Replacement (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), a popular ESC culture medium, induces Tet activity in ESCs to promote DNA demethylation [50]. In addition, global demethylation occurred more frequently in female ESCs compared to in male ESCs because of lower expression of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b [51].
Once ESC lines are generated, ESCs lose pluripotency during prolonged in vitro culture [52]. Several studies have indicated that accumulation of epigenetic alterations over time is associated with the loss of pluripotency in ESCs. Indeed, epigenetic alterations that occur in ESCs persist until later developmental stages and are correlated with abnormal phenotypes in completely ESC-derived mice [53]. Humpherys et al. observed variations in imprinted gene expression in most of the mice cloned from the same donor ESC line [54], indicating epigenetic drift in the same ESC line. Thus, epigenetic alterations appear and accumulate during culture and may have a detrimental effect on survival.
This CpG methylation instability may be induced by an unbalanced Dnmt or Tet expression pattern. Among the Dnmts, several alternative splicing variants lack regulatory and/or catalytic regions. In particular, Dnmt3b has nearly 40 different isoforms generated by alternative splicing and/or alternative promoter usage, and the ratio of its isoforms is different among cell types [55,56,57]. We recently found that mouse Dnmt3b lacking exon 6 (Dnmt3bΔ6) is highly expressed in in vitro manipulated embryos and their derivative ESCs, which exhibit a loss of CpG methylation [43]. In vitro methylation activity assays revealed that Dnmt3bΔ6 had lower methylation activity than the normal Dnmt3b. Gopalakrishnan et al. also report that this isoform is highly expressed in tumors and induced pluripotent stem cells and that ectopic overexpression results in repetitive element hypomethylation [58]. To understand the role of each enzyme, disruption of each or all Dnmt and Tet genes in ESC lines is necessary.
Gene Targeting of Dnmts and Tets in ESCs
The role of Dnmts in mouse ESCs has been widely studied using conventional gene targeting methods. For example, disruption of Dnmt1 in mouse ESCs leads to genome-wide loss of CpG methylation [16]. In addition, ESCs lacking both de novo methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, are unable to methylate proviral genomes and repetitive elements [19]. Moreover, Tsumura et al. established ESCs deficient for all three DNA methyltransferases, including Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b (Dnmt triple KO, Dnmt TKO) [59], and showed that ESCs without CpG methylation maintain stem cell properties, proliferation ability, heterochromatic domains marked with H3K9 trimethylation, and euploidy. Although reduced DNA methylation in mammalian somatic cells typically results in growth defects, cell death, activation of retrotransposons, and genome instability [60,61,62,63,64,65], mouse ESCs can tolerate the CpG hypomethylation status caused by inactivation of all Dnmts. This indicates that gene silencing and chromatin structures are regulated differently in undifferentiated ESCs. In fact, the proliferation of TKO cells is comparable to that of undifferentiated wild-type cells, but their growth is delayed upon differentiation by the formation of embryoid bodies [59].
Recently, clustered regularly at interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases were developed as an epoch-making genome engineering technology known as CRISPR/Cas [66]. This system only requires the Cas9 nuclease and single-guide RNA (sgRNA) complementary to a target sequence. The CRISPR/Cas system makes the generation of knockout cells and animals more convenient than the conventional targeting method. Dnmt KO ESC lines have already been generated in mice using conventional methods [16, 19, 59], but they have not been generated in human cells because of the low targeting efficiency in human pluripotent stem cells. Because DNMT3B mutations cause immunodeficiency, chromosomal instability, and facial anomalies (ICF syndrome) in humans [19, 61, 67], we generated DNMT3B KO lines from human induced pluripotent stem cells using the CRISPR/Cas system [68]. We found that CpGs in pericentromeric regions (satellite 2) lose CpG methylation, as previously observed in ICF syndrome; therefore, this DNMT3B KO cell line may be a good model for studying the syndrome. While Dnmt TKOs are viable in mouse ESCs despite the global loss of DNA methylation, Liao et al. reported that DNMT TKOs are lethal in human ESCs [69]. Disruption of DNMT3A and/or DNMT3B results in viable human ESCs with distinct effects on their DNA methylation landscapes, whereas human ESCs showed rapid cell death after DNMT1 deletion, indicating that DNMT1 is essential for human ESCs but not for mouse ESCs.
Similarly to studies of Dnmts, Tet KO ESCs were generated using both conventional gene targeting methods [36, 70] and the CRISPR/Cas system [71,72,73]. These reports showed that ESCs lacking all three Tet proteins (Tet TKO) were largely normal but undifferentiated. However, Tet1/2 double KO and Tet TKO ESCs showed depleted 5hmC and impaired ESC differentiation, resulting in poor differentiation of embryoid bodies and teratoma formation. Global gene expression and methylome analyses of Tet TKO ESCs revealed promoter [70] or enhancer [73] hypermethylation and deregulation of genes implicated in embryonic development and differentiation. In contrast, functional analyses of Tet TKO ESCs revealed other roles for Tet proteins. For example, Lu et al. indicated a role for Tet proteins in regulating the two-cell embryo-like state under ESC culture conditions [73]. In addition, they showed that Tet TKO ESCs exhibit increased telomere–sister chromatid exchange and elongated telomeres. More recently, our collaborators showed that 5hmC generated by Tet proteins localized at sites of DNA damage and repair, playing an essential role in ensuring genome integrity [74]. The CRISPR/Cas system enables the direct production of genetic KO mice via the introduction of the Cas9/sgRNA complex into zygotes, which is easier than conventional targeting methods using ESCs and chimera mice. We and other groups reported the direct production of Tet KO mice using the CRISPR/Cas system [71, 75] and found that these mice could assist with functional analyses of Tet proteins in vivo. Interestingly, one-step generation of Tet 1/2 multiple KO mice has also been reported [71].
Perspective
The role of each of the Dnmt and Tet genes has been analyzed in detail. However, Dnmts and/or Tets function cooperatively (e.g., Dnmt3a and Dnmt3L), suggesting the necessity of functional analysis using multiple KO cells. Fortunately, CRISPR/Cas enables the generation of multiple KO ESC lines easily, with various combinations of KO cell lines deficient in Dnmt, Tet, and other candidate genes. Particularly, Tet1 overlaps functionally with Tet2 in ESCs and primordial germ cells, but it is not well-understood how they share these roles. Thus, further studies are needed to understand epigenetic regulation in ESCs.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank all of our laboratory members and collaborators for experimental help and encouragement.
References
- 1.Antequera F, Bird A. CpG islands in DNA methylation. In: Jost JP, Saluz HP (eds.), Molecular Biology and Biological Significance. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag; 1993: 169–185.
- 2.Bird AP. CpG island as gene markers in the vertebrate nucleus. Trends Genet 1987; 3: 342–347. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 1987; 196: 261–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Larsen F, Gundersen G, Lopez R, Prydz H. CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics 1992; 13: 1095–1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bird AP, Wolffe AP. Methylation-induced repression—belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell 1999; 99: 451–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Klose RJ, Bird AP. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem Sci 2006; 31: 89–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li E, Zhang Y. DNA methylation in mammals. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014; 6: a019133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jaenisch R. DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother? Trends Genet 1997; 13: 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jones PA, Gonzalgo ML. Altered DNA methylation and genome instability: a new pathway to cancer? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2103–2105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Robertson KD, Wolffe AP. DNA methylation in health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2000; 1: 11–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Surani MA. Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germ line. Cell 1998; 93: 309–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Monk M. Changes in DNA methylation during mouse embryonic development in relation to X-chromosome activity and imprinting. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1990; 326: 299–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dolinoy DC, Weidman JR, Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Maternal genistein alters coat color and protects Avy mouse offspring from obesity by modifying the fetal epigenome. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114: 567–572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bestor TH, Ingram VM. Two DNA methyltransferases from murine erythroleukemia cells: purification, sequence specificity, and mode of interaction with DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80: 5559–5563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bestor T, Laudano A, Mattaliano R, Ingram V. Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding DNA methyltransferase of mouse cells. The carboxyl-terminal domain of the mammalian enzymes is related to bacterial restriction methyltransferases. J Mol Biol 1988; 203: 971–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 1992; 69: 915–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hermann A, Goyal R, Jeltsch A. The Dnmt1 DNA-(cytosine-C5)-methyltransferase methylates DNA processively with high preference for hemimethylated target sites. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 48350–48359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Okano M, Xie S, Li E. Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. Nat Genet 1998; 19: 219–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 1999; 99: 247–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bourc’his D, Xu GL, Lin CS, Bollman B, Bestor TH. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 2001; 294: 2536–2539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, Li E. Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 2002; 129: 1983–1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chedin F, Lieber MR, Hsieh CL. The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 16916–16921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Suetake I, Shinozaki F, Miyagawa J, Takeshima H, Tajima S. DNMT3L stimulates the DNA methylation activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b through a direct interaction. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 27816–27823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gowher H, Liebert K, Hermann A, Xu G, Jeltsch A. Mechanism of stimulation of catalytic activity of Dnmt3A and Dnmt3B DNA-(cytosine-C5)-methyltransferases by Dnmt3L. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 13341–13348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Okano M, Xie S, Li E. Dnmt2 is not required for de novo and maintenance methylation of viral DNA in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26: 2536–2540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kaneda M, Okano M, Hata K, Sado T, Tsujimoto N, Li E, Sasaki H. Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature 2004; 429: 900–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ooi SK, Bestor TH. The colorful history of active DNA demethylation. Cell 2008; 133: 1145–1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu SC, Zhang Y. Active DNA demethylation: many roads lead to Rome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11: 607–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, Agarwal S, Iyer LM, Liu DR, Aravind L, Rao A. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 2009; 324: 930–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, Wu SC, Collins LB, Swenberg JA, He C, Zhang Y. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 2011; 333: 1300–1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Maiti A, Drohat AC. Thymine DNA glycosylase can rapidly excise 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine: potential implications for active demethylation of CpG sites. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 35334–35338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.He YF, Li BZ, Li Z, Liu P, Wang Y, Tang Q, Ding J, Jia Y, Chen Z, Li L, Sun Y, Li X, Dai Q, Song CX, Zhang K, He C, Xu GL. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 2011; 333: 1303–1307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Valinluck V, Sowers LC. Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 946–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ko M, An J, Bandukwala HS, Chavez L, Aijö T, Pastor WA, Segal MF, Li H, Koh KP, Lähdesmäki H, Hogan PG, Aravind L, Rao A. Modulation of TET2 expression and 5-methylcytosine oxidation by the CXXC domain protein IDAX. Nature 2013; 497: 122–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gu TP, Guo F, Yang H, Wu HP, Xu GF, Liu W, Xie ZG, Shi L, He X, Jin SG, Iqbal K, Shi YG, Deng Z, Szabó PE, Pfeifer GP, Li J, Xu GL. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 2011; 477: 606–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dawlaty MM, Breiling A, Le T, Raddatz G, Barrasa MI, Cheng AW, Gao Q, Powell BE, Li Z, Xu M, Faull KF, Lyko F, Jaenisch R. Combined deficiency of Tet1 and Tet2 causes epigenetic abnormalities but is compatible with postnatal development. Dev Cell 2013; 24: 310–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yamaguchi S, Hong K, Liu R, Shen L, Inoue A, Diep D, Zhang K, Zhang Y. Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature 2012; 492: 443–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hackett JA, Sengupta R, Zylicz JJ, Murakami K, Lee C, Down TA, Surani MA. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 2013; 339: 448–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Piccolo FM, Bagci H, Brown KE, Landeira D, Soza-Ried J, Feytout A, Mooijman D, Hajkova P, Leitch HG, Tada T, Kriaucionis S, Dawlaty MM, Jaenisch R, Merkenschlager M, Fisher AG. Different roles for Tet1 and Tet2 proteins in reprogramming-mediated erasure of imprints induced by EGC fusion. Mol Cell 2013; 49: 1023–1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vincent JJ, Huang Y, Chen PY, Feng S, Calvopiña JH, Nee K, Lee SA, Le T, Yoon AJ, Faull K, Fan G, Rao A, Jacobsen SE, Pellegrini M, Clark AT. Stage-specific roles for tet1 and tet2 in DNA demethylation in primordial germ cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013; 12: 470–478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yamaguchi S, Shen L, Liu Y, Sendler D, Zhang Y. Role of Tet1 in erasure of genomic imprinting. Nature 2013; 504: 460–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Horii T, Kimura M, Morita S, Nagao Y, Hatada I. Loss of genomic imprinting in mouse parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2008; 26: 79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Horii T, Suetake I, Yanagisawa E, Morita S, Kimura M, Nagao Y, Imai H, Tajima S, Hatada I. The Dnmt3b splice variant is specifically expressed in in vitro-manipulated blastocysts and their derivative ES cells. J Reprod Dev 2011; 57: 579–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Market-Velker BA, Zhang L, Magri LS, Bonvissuto AC, Mann MR. Dual effects of superovulation: loss of maternal and paternal imprinted methylation in a dose-dependent manner. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19: 36–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Doherty AS, Mann MR, Tremblay KD, Bartolomei MS, Schultz RM. Differential effects of culture on imprinted H19 expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 1526–1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292: 154–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 7634–7638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Horii T, Yanagisawa E, Kimura M, Morita S, Hatada I. Epigenetic differences between embryonic stem cells generated from blastocysts developed in vitro and in vivo. Cell Reprogram 2010; 12: 551–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Horii T, Hatada I. Epigenetic Instability in Embryonic Stem Cells. In: Deepa Bhartiya and Nibedita Lenka (eds.), Pluripotent Stem Cells. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2013: 301–316.
- 50.Blaschke K, Ebata KT, Karimi MM, Zepeda-Martínez JA, Goyal P, Mahapatra S, Tam A, Laird DJ, Hirst M, Rao A, Lorincz MC, Ramalho-Santos M. Vitamin C induces Tet-dependent DNA demethylation and a blastocyst-like state in ES cells. Nature 2013; 500: 222–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zvetkova I, Apedaile A, Ramsahoye B, Mermoud JE, Crompton LA, John R, Feil R, Brockdorff N. Global hypomethylation of the genome in XX embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 1274–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nagy A, Gócza E, Diaz EM, Prideaux VR, Iványi E, Markkula M, Rossant J. Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 1990; 110: 815–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dean W, Bowden L, Aitchison A, Klose J, Moore T, Meneses JJ, Reik W, Feil R. Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Development 1998; 125: 2273–2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H, Hochedlinger K, Rideout WM, 3rd, Biniszkiewicz D, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R. Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 2001; 293: 95–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Weisenberger DJ, Velicescu M, Cheng JC, Gonzales FA, Liang G, Jones PA. Role of the DNA methyltransferase variant DNMT3b3 in DNA methylation. Mol Cancer Res 2004; 2: 62–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang L, Wang J, Sun S, Rodriguez M, Yue P, Jang SJ, Mao L. A novel DNMT3B subfamily, DeltaDNMT3B, is the predominant form of DNMT3B in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Oncol 2006; 29: 201–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ostler KR, Davis EM, Payne SL, Gosalia BB, Expósito-Céspedes J, Le Beau MM, Godley LA. Cancer cells express aberrant DNMT3B transcripts encoding truncated proteins. Oncogene 2007; 26: 5553–5563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gopalakrishnan S, Van Emburgh BO, Shan J, Su Z, Fields CR, Vieweg J, Hamazaki T, Schwartz PH, Terada N, Robertson KD. A novel DNMT3B splice variant expressed in tumor and pluripotent cells modulates genomic DNA methylation patterns and displays altered DNA binding. Mol Cancer Res 2009; 7: 1622–1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tsumura A, Hayakawa T, Kumaki Y, Takebayashi S, Sakaue M, Matsuoka C, Shimotohno K, Ishikawa F, Li E, Ueda HR, Nakayama J, Okano M. Maintenance of self-renewal ability of mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Genes Cells 2006; 11: 805–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Walsh CP, Chaillet JR, Bestor TH. Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation. Nat Genet 1998; 20: 116–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Xu GL, Bestor TH, Bourc’his D, Hsieh CL, Tommerup N, Bugge M, Hulten M, Qu X, Russo JJ, Viegas-Péquignot E. Chromosome instability and immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in a DNA methyltransferase gene. Nature 1999; 402: 187–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jackson-Grusby L, Beard C, Possemato R, Tudor M, Fambrough D, Csankovszki G, Dausman J, Lee P, Wilson C, Lander E, Jaenisch R. Loss of genomic methylation causes p53-dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation. Nat Genet 2001; 27: 31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rhee I, Bachman KE, Park BH, Jair KW, Yen RW, Schuebel KE, Cui H, Feinberg AP, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Baylin SB, Vogelstein B. DNMT1 and DNMT3b cooperate to silence genes in human cancer cells. Nature 2002; 416: 552–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Eden A, Gaudet F, Waghmare A, Jaenisch R. Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation. Science 2003; 300: 455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gaudet F, Hodgson JG, Eden A, Jackson-Grusby L, Dausman J, Gray JW, Leonhardt H, Jaenisch R. Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation. Science 2003; 300: 489–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012; 337: 816–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hansen RS, Wijmenga C, Luo P, Stanek AM, Canfield TK, Weemaes CM, Gartler SM. The DNMT3B DNA methyltransferase gene is mutated in the ICF immunodeficiency syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 14412–14417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Horii T, Tamura D, Morita S, Kimura M, Hatada I. Generation of an ICF syndrome model by efficient genome editing of human induced pluripotent stem cells using the CRISPR system. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14: 19774–19781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liao J, Karnik R, Gu H, Ziller MJ, Clement K, Tsankov AM, Akopian V, Gifford CA, Donaghey J, Galonska C, Pop R, Reyon D, Tsai SQ, Mallard W, Joung JK, Rinn JL, Gnirke A, Meissner A. Targeted disruption of DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B in human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 469–478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dawlaty MM, Breiling A, Le T, Barrasa MI, Raddatz G, Gao Q, Powell BE, Cheng AW, Faull KF, Lyko F, Jaenisch R. Loss of Tet enzymes compromises proper differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell 2014; 29: 102–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, Jaenisch R. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 2013; 153: 910–918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Horii T, Morita S, Kimura M, Kobayashi R, Tamura D, Takahashi RU, Kimura H, Suetake I, Ohata H, Okamoto K, Tajima S, Ochiya T, Abe Y, Hatada I. Genome engineering of mammalian haploid embryonic stem cells using the Cas9/RNA system. PeerJ 2013; 1: e230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lu F, Liu Y, Jiang L, Yamaguchi S, Zhang Y. Role of Tet proteins in enhancer activity and telomere elongation. Genes Dev 2014; 28: 2103–2119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kafer GR, Li X, Horii T, Suetake I, Tajima S, Hatada I, Carlton PM. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Marks Sites of DNA Damage and Promotes Genome Stability. Cell Reports 2016; 14: 1283–1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Horii T, Arai Y, Yamazaki M, Morita S, Kimura M, Itoh M, Abe Y, Hatada I. Validation of microinjection methods for generating knockout mice by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 4513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


