Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1996 Jul;49(7):581–583. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.7.581

One-day detection of PCR amplified Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in clinical samples: ELISA versus Southern blot hybridisation.

R T Roymans 1, G Onland 1, B H Postma 1
PMCID: PMC500575  PMID: 8813959

Abstract

AIMS: To compare ELISA and Southern blot hybridisation for the detection of PCR amplified Chlamydia trachomatis DNA extracted from clinical samples; to assess the value of the ELISA method in a clinical setting. METHODS: DNA was extracted from urogenital samples of 508 patients, purified and amplified using C trachomatis specific primers, one of which was endlabelled with biotin. Amplification products were detected by Streptavidin biotin based ELISA and non-radioactive Southern blotting. RESULTS: Of the 508 samples, 29 were positive and 479 negative by both methods. No discrepant results were observed. CONCLUSION: Streptavidin biotin based ELISA and Southern blotting were equally sensitive for detecting PCR amplified C trachomatis DNA. Using ELISA, test results could be generated within a single day.

Full text

PDF
581

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boom R., Sol C. J., Salimans M. M., Jansen C. L., Wertheim-van Dillen P. M., van der Noordaa J. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):495–503. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.495-503.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brunham R. C., Maclean I. W., Binns B., Peeling R. W. Chlamydia trachomatis: its role in tubal infertility. J Infect Dis. 1985 Dec;152(6):1275–1282. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.6.1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Claas E. C., Melchers W. J., Niesters H. G., van Muyden R., Stolz E., Quint W. G. Infections of the cervix uteri with human papillomavirus and Chlamydia trachomatis. J Med Virol. 1992 May;37(1):54–57. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890370109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Claas H. C., Wagenvoort J. H., Niesters H. G., Tio T. T., Van Rijsoort-Vos J. H., Quint W. G. Diagnostic value of the polymerase chain reaction for Chlamydia detection as determined in a follow-up study. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):42–45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.42-45.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith J. W., Rogers R. E., Katz B. P., Brickler J. F., Lineback P. L., Van der Pol B., Jones R. B. Diagnosis of chlamydial infection in women attending antenatal and gynecologic clinics. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May;25(5):868–872. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.868-872.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sriprakash K. S., Macavoy E. S. Characterization and sequence of a plasmid from the trachoma biovar of Chlamydia trachomatis. Plasmid. 1987 Nov;18(3):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(87)90063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES