Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1998 Mar;51(3):250–252. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.3.250

Unacceptably high site variability in postmortem blood alcohol analysis.

P A Sylvester 1, N A Wong 1, B F Warren 1, D L Ranson 1
PMCID: PMC500652  PMID: 9659273

Abstract

Blood alcohol concentration is a frequently requested test in forensic pathology. The variability of this value was studied by measuring the blood alcohol concentration from six sites in nine subjects at necropsy in whom alcohol was the implicated cause of death. There were small consistent differences in the blood alcohol concentrations between the sites in the nine subjects (p < 0.04). Calculation of the mean blood:vitreous humour alcohol concentration ratio (B:V ratio) showed that vitreous humour alcohol concentration most closely reflected the concentration at the femoral vein (B:V ratio = 0.94, r = 0.98), which is considered the optimal site for blood alcohol measurement. The correlation of left heart blood with femoral blood was lower compared with the other sites. There is a potential for an unacceptably large variation in the postmortem measurement of blood alcohol within each subject.

Full text

PDF
250

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Briglia E. J., Bidanset J. H., Dal Cortivo L. A. The distribution of ethanol in postmortem blood specimens. J Forensic Sci. 1992 Jul;37(4):991–998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caplan Y. H., Levine B. Vitreous humor in the evaluation of postmortem blood ethanol concentrations. J Anal Toxicol. 1990 Sep-Oct;14(5):305–307. doi: 10.1093/jat/14.5.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao T. C., Lo D. S. Relationship between postmortem blood and vitreous humor ethanol levels. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1993 Dec;14(4):303–308. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199312000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coe J. I., Sherman R. E. Comparative study of postmortem vitreous humor and blood alcohol. J Forensic Sci. 1970 Apr;15(2):185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Healy M. J., Whitehead T. P. Outlying values in the National Quality Control Scheme. Ann Clin Biochem. 1980 Mar;17(2):78–81. doi: 10.1177/000456328001700203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marraccini J. V., Carroll T., Grant S., Halleran S., Benz J. A. Differences between multisite postmortem ethanol concentrations as related to agonal events. J Forensic Sci. 1990 Nov;35(6):1360–1366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Neal C. L., Poklis A. Postmortem production of ethanol and factors that influence interpretation: a critical review. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1996 Mar;17(1):8–20. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199603000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pounder D. J., Smith D. R. Postmortem diffusion of alcohol from the stomach. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1995 Jun;16(2):89–96. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199506000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES