Abstract
AIM: To assess the reliability of local international normalised ratios (INR) using a set of three international reference preparation (IRP) certified freeze dried plasmas. METHODS: 55 centres in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland participated; 36 centres employed coagulometers and 19 a manual prothrombin time technique, all with the same batch of routine commercial thromboplastin. The plasmas had certified INR with the manual technique using a thromboplastin IRP, and results were provided graphically to participants for self assessment. An INR deviation of more than +/- 10% from the certified INR with any of the screening plasmas was regarded as unsatisfactory and clinically significant. Sets of 20 freeze dried plasmas were provided for local ISI calibrations and sets of seven freeze dried normals were provided for supplementary exercises where screening results were unsatisfactory. RESULTS: 15 of 38 coagulometers, but only three of the 19 manual prothrombin time test techniques, gave unsatisfactory results. With 10 of the 15 unsatisfactory coagulometer results the problem was resolved by local ISI calibrations with plasma calibrant sets provided. Unsatisfactory results with manual technique in all four instances were corrected by substitution of the mean result with freeze dried normal plasmas provided. CONCLUSIONS: The freeze dried plasma screening set was useful in detecting incorrect INR in a high proportion of coagulometer users and a smaller number of participants using the manual technique.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Clarke K., Taberner D. A., Thomson J. M., Morris J. A., Poller L. Assessment of value of calibrated lyophilised plasmas to determine International Sensitivity Index for coagulometers. J Clin Pathol. 1992 Jan;45(1):58–60. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.1.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'Angelo A., Seveso M. P., D'Angelo S. V., Gilardoni F., Macagni A., Manotti C., Bonini P. Comparison of two automated coagulometers and the manual tilt-tube method for the determination of prothrombin time. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989 Sep;92(3):321–328. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/92.3.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitchen S., Walker I. D., Woods T. A., Preston F. E. Thromboplastin related differences in the determination of international normalised ratio: a cause for concern? Steering Committee of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 1994 Sep;72(3):426–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poller L., Barrowcliffe T. W., van den Besselaar A. M., Jespersen J., Tripodi A., Houghton D. Minimum lyophilized plasma requirement for ISI calibration. European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998 Feb;109(2):196–204. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/109.2.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poller L., Thomson J. M., Taberner D. A. Effect of automation on prothrombin time test in NEQAS surveys. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Jan;42(1):97–100. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poller L., Triplett D. A., Hirsh J., Carroll J., Clarke K. The value of plasma calibrants in correcting coagulometer effects on international normalized ratios. An international multicenter study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Mar;103(3):358–365. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/103.3.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray M. J., Smith I. R. The dependence of the International Sensitivity Index on the coagulometer used to perform the prothrombin time. Thromb Haemost. 1990 Jun 28;63(3):424–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Rijn J. L., Schmidt N. A., Rutten W. P. Correction of instrument- and reagent-based differences in determination of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for monitoring anticoagulant therapy. Clin Chem. 1989 May;35(5):840–843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van den Besselaar A. M., Peters R. H. Multicentre evaluation of the Thrombotest International Sensitivity Index used with a steel ball coagulometer. J Clin Pathol. 1996 May;49(5):414–417. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.5.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]