Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Sep 1;6:32684. doi: 10.1038/srep32684

Acute trauma induced disc displacement without reduction and its sequelae

DongMei He 1,a,*, XiuJuan Yang 1,*, FeiYu Wang 1,*, Chi Yang 1,b, MinJun Dong 2
PMCID: PMC5007667  PMID: 27582054

Abstract

Acute traumatic temporomandibular joint disc displacement (ATDD) and its sequelae are not familiar for most surgeons. This study is to discuss its sequelae in cases without disc reduction after failed conservative treatment. From 2010 to 2015, 26 patients with 34 joints were included in the study. All patients had at least 3 months conservative treatment. Their maximal incisor opening (MIO) was measured during follow-ups and MRI examination was used to check the condylar bone degeneration. The mean follow-up for conservative treatment after admission was 8.69 months, the patients reached an average of 25.7 mm MIO. MRI showed condylar bone intact in 8 joints (23.5%), condylar surface bone destruction (Wilks IV, V stages) in 14 joints (41.2%), and severe bone resorption in 12 joints (35.3%). 15 patients with 23 joints were asked for surgical treatment after a mean conservative treatment of 5.4 months (3–12 months) to improve mouth opening and relieve chronic pain. 12 joints had total joint replacement (TJR). 11 joints had disc repositioning. Their mean MIO before operation was 19.8 mm and significantly improved to 33.9 mm after operation (p = 0.0000). ATDD may cause severe osteoarthritis or ankylosis. Disc repositioning and TJR could significantly improve MIO.

Trauma to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) can cause both bone and soft tissue injuries, like intracapsular condylar fracture (ICF) with mostly displaced TMJ disc without reduction1,2,3,4,5. Whereas there is another type of injury without condylar fracture, only displaced disc without reduction4,6,7. This is very easy to neglect because disc displacement can not be detected in computer tomography (CT) or X-ray films. The development and application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provided valuable information on both bone and soft tissue injuries. Our previous study8 showed that the characteristics of ATDD without reduction are: (1) facial trauma, especially in the chin area; (2) no TMJ pain, clicking, crispus, mouth opening limitation and mandibular movement dysfunction before injury; (3) TMJ swelling, pain and mouth opening limitation after injury; (4) CT examination showing no condylar fracture on the painful side, but a decreased or diminished space between the condyle and fossa on the coronal reconstruction; and (5) MRI examination showing an anteriorly displaced TMJ disc with a normal shape, but the posterior disc band is elongated or maybe disrupted with or without effusion in the joint space. This is different from the patients who have physiologically displaced disc according to MRI but without any clinical signs. The length and shape of those patients’ disc are not normal, usually deformed.

Disc displacement by acute trauma may develop much faster than the one by micro trauma. Merrill2 used TMJ arthroscopy to check 1151 patients with internal derangement and showed that 60% had a history of mandibular trauma at least one year before. Although patients had no condylar fracture, there was severe condylar surface bone destruction with an anteriorly displaced TMJ disc. Another study by Wang9 showed that discs became displaced in between 18% and 66% of cases when there was no condylar fracture in the 22 patients after acute mandibular injury. The mandibular condyle and articular tubercle were impaired in approximately 20% of cases. This is different from Kolk and Neff’s study that osteoarthritis happened around 9.1~11.5% in ICFs10. Because most of the time, the TMJ disc displaces with the condylar head, so the condylar cartilage is well protected. But in ATDD cases, without disc protection, the condylar cartilage may degenerate fast. As well known in the literature and also in clinical practice, as much as at least 25% of the disc displacement without reduction cases described in MRI are in fact physiological variants without presenting any pathology. The clinical symptoms are not consistent with the MRI findings.

Although conservative treatment could provide some 80% sufficient healing in the micro-trauma caused disc displacement11,12, there were no reports on the prognosis of disc displacement caused by acute trauma. This was dealt with so far in cases with concomitant fractures10. Is it developed faster and need early surgical treatment to prevent osteoarthritis or ankylosis are still unknown.

This study sought to find the sequelae of ATDD without reduction after failed conservative treatment by both clinical and MRI evaluation.

Results

Basic information

Twenty-six patients with 34 joints were included in the study (Table 1). They all had disc displacement without reduction by MRI examination (Fig. 1). Among them, there were 14 males and 12 females, with an age ranged from 4 to 49 years old (mean, 32.6 years). One patient with bilateral ATDD without Reduction also had a combined mandibular symphysis fracture which was reduced and rigid fixed immediately after injury. But his bilateral ATDD developed to osteoarthritis after 6 months conservative treatment. Four patients had one joint of ATDD, and the other joint of ICF. One of the 4 ICFs developed to ankylosis after 4 months conservative treatment and accepted costochondral graft for joint replacement. The other 3 ICFs healed with malunion of the ramus. The follow-up period was from 3 to 24 months (mean, 8.69 months).

Table 1. Basic information and conservative treatment results.

Number of patients (Joints) 26 (34)
Gender 14 males, 12 females
Age 32.6 ± 11.4 (4~49) years old
Follow-up period 8.69 ± 6.4 (3~24) months
MIO 25.7 ± 9.6 (7~40)mm
Condylar cortical bone continuity 6 (8, 23.5%)
Condylar cortical bone incontinuity 13 (14, 41.2%)
Condylar severe bone resorption 7 (12, 35.3%)
Open in a new tab

Figure 1. MRI showed acute phase of ATDD, disc displaced in front of the condyle (red arrow) with normal shape and length.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The posterior band was disrupted and elongated with or without effusion (white arrow).

Treatment and follow-ups

MIO during the last follow-up was from 7 to 40 mm (mean 25.7 mm).

At the end of conservative follow up, MRI showed condylar bone intact in 6 patients with 8 joints (23.5%), condylar surface bone destruction (Wilks IV, V stages) in 13 patients with 14 joints (41.2%, Fig. 2), and severe bone resorption in 7 patients with 12 joints (35.3%, Fig. 3, Table 1).

Figure 2. MRI showed condylar bone degeneration after ATDD.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) disc displaced anteriorly 3 weeks after injury, the condylar bone was intact. (B) the condylar surface bone resorbed 5 months after injury (arrow).

Figure 3. Disc displacement and condylar bone destruction in the end stage.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Decreased joint space post injury by coronal CT reconstruction (arrow). (B) Condylar bone resorption 3 months post injury by coronal CT reconstruction. (C) MRI showed right disc displacement with condylar bone destruction (arrow). (D) MRI showed left disc displacement with condylar bone destruction (arrow).

15 patients with 23 joints were asked for surgical treatment after a mean conservative treatment of 5.4 months (3–12 months) to improve mouth opening and relieve chronic pain (Table 2). 7 patients with 12 joints had total joint replacement (TJR). 8 patients with 11 joints had disc repositioning. Their mean MIO before operation was 19.8 mm. After operation their mean MIO was significantly improved to 33.9 mm (p = 0.0000, Table 2).

Table 2. Surgical treatment results.

  Disc reposioning Total Joint replacement
Number of patients (Joints) 8 (11) 7 (12)
Time point of surgical treatment 3–12 months (mean 5.4 months)
MIO before operation 19.8 ± 8.2 (7~32)mm*
MIO after operation 33.9 ± 5.9 (25~45)mm*
Open in a new tab

*p = 0.000

Discussion

Disc displacement can be caused by micro-trauma or acute trauma. There are many reports on temporomandibular disorders (TMD) caused by micro-trauma, but few on ATDD without reduction. Doctors usually pay more attention to whether there is a condylar fracture and overlook cases without a condylar fracture6,7. Are those intact condyles really healthy? After acute trauma, TMJ changes and the governing factors in the development of complications are rarely reported. There is also a lack of reports on the long-term follow-up results of ATDD without reduction9. Although conservative treatment for the disc displacement without reduction showed some good results11,12, the prognosis is quiet different in the acute trauma. This study showed that the condylar bone degenerated fast after at least 3 months conservative treatment, 35.3% of the condyle had severe bone resorption and adhesion in the joint which caused chronic pain and mouth opening limitation. TJR was selected for treatment. This is different from Kolk and Neff’s study that osteoarthritis happened around 9.1~11.5% in ICFs10. Because most of the time, the TMJ disc displaces with the condylar head, so the condylar cartilage is well protected. But in this study, without disc protection, the condylar cartilage degenerated fast. As well known in the literature and also in clinical practice, as much as at least 25% of the disc displacement without reduction cases described in MRI are in fact physiological variants without presenting any pathology. The clinical symptoms are not consistent with the MRI findings. In this study, we only included patients with failed conservative treatment and found the high incidence of bone destruction with or without clinical symptoms.

Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) is the most severe and fast developing type of osteoarthritis due to direct trauma to the mandible (mostly the chin), which causes damage to the articular cartilage; a tear of the TMJ retrodiscal lamina and an anterior acute disc displacement. Because of the backward force to the condyle, the disc is severely extruded, which may result in a retrodisc or lateral disc ligament rupture and the squeezing of the disc body to the anterior part of the condyle, causing acute disc displacement. The cartilage is damaged with subchondral bone microfracture, causing minor sinking. Due to the lack of protection of the disc body (role of stress distribution), the occurrence and development of condylar osteoarthritis are rapid. Some patients developed end-stage disease very fast in this study. TJR was performed for those patients to relieve chronic pain and improve mouth opening.

The clinical and experimental results showed that disc displacement could cause an increased load on the condyle and promote it to resorb and degenerate to osteoarthritis or even ankylosis13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. Our previous clinical observation showed that disc repositioning could stimulate condyle growth in growing patients16. However, the results of disc repositioning on the early stage after trauma are unknown. In this study, 8 patients with 11 joints accepted disc repositioning after at least 3 months failed conservative treatment. Their mouth opening was significantly improved compared before operation. No severe condylar bone resorption was happened after disc repositioning in this study. Abramowicz also reported in 2010 that TMJ disc repositioning is an effective and successful surgical treatment for TMJ internal derangement, which can be maintained for 20 years18. Disc repositioning according to an animal model presented by Li and He et al.17 can prevent severe osteoarthritis and ankylosis.

In conclusion, ATDD may cause severe osteoarthritis or ankylosis. Disc repositioning and TJR could significantly improve MIO. It may be supposed that patients not responding adequately to conservative treatment are more susceptible to develop OA or even ankylosis. Further studies are required to analyse the underlying factors responsible for adverse outcomes after ATDD.

Patients and methods

Clinical data

This was a cohort retrospective study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. It was approved by the local ethics board of the hospital (Scientific Research Projects Approval Determination of Independent Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine, 2014–46). The informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Patients who had pre-auricular pain and a mouth opening limitation after facial trauma from January 2010 to December 2015 were included in the study. The criteria for the diagnosis of ATDD were: (1) history of facial trauma; (2) no TMJ symptoms, such as pain, clicking, crepitus, mouth opening limitation, and abnormal mandibular movement before trauma but persistent pre-auricular pain after trauma; (3) no condylar fracture on the painful side by CT examination; (4) MRI examination showed an anteriorly displaced TMJ disc with a normal or nearly normal shape and length; (5) Patients were excluded if they had: (1) TMJ symptoms before trauma; (2) condylar fracture; and (3) abnormal disc shape and length in MRI.

Treatment and evaluation

Conservative treatment including mouth opening exercise and medication to relieve pain were used. MIO and condylar bone degeneration was evaluated by MRI durging follow-ups. For the patients failed of conservative treatment more than 3 months, disc repositioning or TJR was used according to the TMJ status to improve MIO and relieve pain for the patients. MIO before and after operation was compared using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Student’s paired t test was used to establish intragroup (before and after treatment) significance and non-parametric tests on k independent samples, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to determine the significance of intergroup MIO improvement. An α level of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: He, D.M. et al. Acute trauma induced disc displacement without reduction and its sequelae. Sci. Rep. 6, 32684; doi: 10.1038/srep32684 (2016).

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472117), Combined Medicine and Engineering Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2014MS05), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Science Research Project 14DZ2294300, and Ninth Students’ Innovative Training Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (2015502).

Footnotes

Author Contributions X.J.Y. was responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the data. F.Y.W. assisted the first author with analysis the data. M.J.D. provided study materials. D.M.H. drafted the article and is one of the corresponding authors responsible for the design of the study and operation. C.Y. is one of the corresponding authors responsible for conception and design and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. C.Y. is the person who made the final approval of the article.

References

  1. Wang P., Yang J. & Yu Q. MR imaging assessment of temporomandibular joint soft tissue injuries in dislocated and nondislocated mandibular condylar fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30, 59–63 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Merrill R. G. Discussion. The arthroscopic appearance of acute temporomandibular joint trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48, 784 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goss A. N. & Bosanquet A. G. The arthroscopic appearance of acute temporomandibular joint trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48, 780–783 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goss A. N. & Whyte A. Discussion. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of acute soft tissue injuries to the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53, 766–767 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sullivan S., Banghart P. R. & Anderson Q. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of acute soft tissue injuries to the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53, 763–766 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones J. & Van Sickels J. A preliminary report of arthroscopic findings following acute condylar trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49, 55–60 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Emshoff R., Rudisch A., Ennemoser T. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of temporomandibular joint soft tissue changes in type V and VI condylar injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65, 1550–1554 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. He D., Yang C., Chen M., Yang X. & Li L. Effects of soft tissue injury to the temporomandibular joint: report of 8 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51, 58–62 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang J. X. et al. Early MRI display in the tramatic temporomandibular joints (in Chinese). J Oral Sci Res 24, 443–517 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. Kolk A. & Neff A. Long-term results of ORIF of condylar head fractures of the mandible: A prospective 5-year follow-up study of small-fragment positional-screw osteosynthesis (SFPSO). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43, 452–461 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haketa T., Kino K., Sugisaki M., Takaoka M. & Ohta T. Randomized clinical trial of treatment for TMJ disc displacement. J Dent Res 89, 1259–1263 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diraçoğlu D. et al. Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108, 3–8 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang C., Cai X. Y., Chen M. J. & Zhang S. Y. New arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing technique for treating an anteriorly displaceddisc of the temporomandibular joint: part I–technique introduction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41, 1058–1063 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. He D., Yang C., Zhang S. & Wilson J. J. Modified Temporomandibular Joint Disc Repositioning with Mini Screw Anchor: part I – surgical technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73, 47e1–4e9e (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cai X. Y., Jin J. M. & Yang C. Changes in disc position, disc length, and condylar height in the temporomandibular joint with anterior disc displacement: a longitudinal retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69, e340–e346 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li H. et al. Disc positions and condylar changes induced by different stretching forces in the model for anterior disc displacement of temporomandibular joint. J Craniofac Surg 25, 2112–2116 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li L., Wang L., Sun Yuhuan, Yang C. & He D. Establishment and histological evaluation of a goat traumatic temporomandibular joint model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73, 943–950 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Abramowicz S. & Dolwick M. F. 20-year follow-up study of disc repositioning surgery for temporomandibular joint internal derangement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68, 239–242 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dolwick M. F. & Nitzan D. W. The role of disc repositioning surgery for internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6, 271 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  20. Kondoh T., Hamada Y., Kazutoshi K. & Seto K. Simple disc reshaping surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: 5-years follow up results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61, 41–48 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gonçalves J. R., Cassano D. S., Rezende L. & Wolford L. M. Disc repositioning: does it really work? Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 27, 85–107 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES