Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1996 Nov;49(11):909–912. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.11.909

Factors predicting cases with unexpected clinical findings at necropsy.

I A Robinson 1, N J Marley 1
PMCID: PMC500830  PMID: 8944610

Abstract

AIMS/BACKGROUND: A major medical role for postmortem examinations is the detection of clinically unexpected disease processes contributing to death. The aim of the present study was to determine whether simple clinical parameters can predict the presence of important unanticipated findings at necropsy. METHODS: Prospective audit of adult necropsies carried out in a single year to assess the extent of unexpected findings at necropsy, to compare these cases with non-necropsied deaths to confirm they are a similar population and to seek features that predict which cases have unexpected necropsy findings. RESULTS: No correlation was found between age, sex, duration of in-hospital treatment, surgical intervention, clinical specialty, or necropsy request rates and incidence of unexpected findings in 187 adult necropsies. CONCLUSIONS: No parameters have been identified for patient selection to permit an increase in the yield of clinically unexpected findings. Until there is clear evidence that the current practice of patient selection is anything more than random, an increase in postmortem examination rates, as proposed by the Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists, the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Surgeons of England in their report The Autospy and Audit, will increase the workload without necessarily producing a commensurate gain in knowledge.

Full text

PDF
909

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barendregt W. B., de Boer H. H., Kubat K. Autopsy analysis in surgical patients: a basis for clinical audit. Br J Surg. 1992 Dec;79(12):1297–1299. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800791218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barendregt W. B., de Boer H. H., Kubat K. The results of autopsy of patients with surgical diseases of the digestive tract. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Sep;175(3):227–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boldy D. A., Jones C., Matthews H., Edwards C. Deaths and necropsies in a thoracic unit. Thorax. 1993 Mar;48(3):284–286. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.3.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Britton M. Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy. Acta Med Scand. 1974 Sep;196(3):203–210. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1974.tb00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke M. C., Aghababian R. V., Blackbourne B. Use of autopsy results in the emergency department quality assurance plan. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Apr;19(4):363–366. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82334-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cameron H. M., McGoogan E. A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification. J Pathol. 1981 Apr;133(4):273–283. doi: 10.1002/path.1711330402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carvalho F. M., Widmer M. R., Cruz M., Palomo V., Cruz C. Clinical diagnosis versus autopsy. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1991;25(1):41–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Di Furia L., Piga A., Marmili S., Breccia R., Rubini C., Beltrami C. A., Mariuzzi G. M., Cellerino R. The value of necropsy in oncology. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(5):559–561. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90216-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Editorial: Perinatal research. Br Med J. 1975 May 3;2(5965):236–237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gloth F. M., 3rd, Burton J. R. Autopsies and death certificates in the chronic care setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Feb;38(2):151–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gloth F. M., 3rd, Burton J. R. Geriatric autopsies: it's time to get involved. Geriatrics. 1990 Nov;45(11):72–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldman L. Diagnostic advances v the value of the autopsy. 1912-1980. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984 Jun;108(6):501–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grundmann E., Menke G. G. Autopsy diagnosis versus clinical diagnosis, particularly in malignant disease. Comparison of two periods: 1961-70 and 1978-87. IARC Sci Publ. 1991;(112):81–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harris M. D., Blundell J. W. Audit of necropsies in a British district general hospital. J Clin Pathol. 1991 Oct;44(10):862–865. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.10.862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harrison M., Hourihane D. O. Quality assurance programme for necropsies. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Nov;42(11):1190–1193. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.11.1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kajiwara J. K., Zucoloto S., Manço A. R., Muccillo G., Barbieri M. A. Accuracy of clinical diagnoses in a teaching hospital: a review of 997 autopsies. J Intern Med. 1993 Aug;234(2):181–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. King D. W. Potential of the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984 Jun;108(6):439–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koszyca B., Moore L., Toogood I., Byard R. W. Is postmortem examination useful in pediatric oncology? Pediatr Pathol. 1993 Nov-Dec;13(6):709–715. doi: 10.3109/15513819309048257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Landefeld C. S., Chren M. M., Myers A., Geller R., Robbins S., Goldman L. Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med. 1988 May 12;318(19):1249–1254. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198805123181906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mitchell M. L. Interdepartmental quality assurance using coded autopsy results. Mod Pathol. 1993 Jan;6(1):48–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Modelmog D., Rahlenbeck S., Trichopoulos D. Accuracy of death certificates: a population-based, complete-coverage, one-year autopsy study in East Germany. Cancer Causes Control. 1992 Nov;3(6):541–546. doi: 10.1007/BF00052751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mosquera D. A., Goldman M. D. Surgical audit without autopsy: tales of the unexpected. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Mar;75(2):115–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ollé-Goig J. E., Canela-Soler J. The value of the autopsy in a rural hospital of Haiti. Trop Doct. 1993 Apr;23(2):52–54. doi: 10.1177/004947559302300204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Poli L., Pich A., Zanocchi M., Fonte G., Bo M., Fabris F. Autopsy and multiple pathology in the elderly. Gerontology. 1993;39(1):55–63. doi: 10.1159/000213515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Russell G. A., Berry P. J. Postmortem audit in a paediatric cardiology unit. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Sep;42(9):912–918. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.9.912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Saracci R. Is necropsy a valid monitor of clinical diagnosis performance? BMJ. 1991 Oct 12;303(6807):898–900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6807.898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sarode V. R., Datta B. N., Banerjee A. K., Banerjee C. K., Joshi K., Bhusnurmath B., Radotra B. D. Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: a review of 1,000 cases. Hum Pathol. 1993 Feb;24(2):194–198. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90300-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schned A. R., Mogielnicki R. P., Stauffer M. E. A comprehensive quality assessment program on the autopsy service. Am J Clin Pathol. 1986 Aug;86(2):133–138. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/86.2.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shanks J. H., Anderson N. H., McCluggage G., Toner P. G. Use of the autopsy in Northern Ireland and its value in perioperative deaths. IARC Sci Publ. 1991;(112):115–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stambouly J. J., Kahn E., Boxer R. A. Correlation between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in critically ill children. Pediatrics. 1993 Aug;92(2):248–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Teo C. E. A study of coroner's cases from hospitals: a comparison of autopsy and clinical diagnosis. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1993 Jan;22(1):3–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Veress B., Alafuzoff I. A retrospective analysis of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 3,042 cases during two different time periods. Hum Pathol. 1994 Feb;25(2):140–145. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(94)90269-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wells R. J. Diagnostic yield of the autopsy. N Engl J Med. 1988 Oct 20;319(16):1095–1096. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES