Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
. 2016 Sep 5;26(9):493–511. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150268

The Tohoku Medical Megabank Project: Design and Mission

東北メディカル・メガバンク計画:デザインとミッション

Shinichi Kuriyama 1,2,3, Nobuo Yaegashi 1,2,4, Fuji Nagami 1, Tomohiko Arai 1, Yoshio Kawaguchi 1, Noriko Osumi 1,2, Masaki Sakaida 1, Yoichi Suzuki 1,2, Keiko Nakayama 1,2, Hiroaki Hashizume 1, Gen Tamiya 1, Hiroshi Kawame 1,2, Kichiya Suzuki 1,2,4, Atsushi Hozawa 1,2, Naoki Nakaya 1,2, Masahiro Kikuya 1,2, Hirohito Metoki 1,2, Ichiro Tsuji 1,2, Nobuo Fuse 1,2,4, Hideyasu Kiyomoto 1,2,4, Junichi Sugawara 1,2,4, Akito Tsuboi 1,4,5, Shinichi Egawa 1,2,3,4, Kiyoshi Ito 1,2,3,4, Koichi Chida 1,2,3,4, Tadashi Ishii 1,2,4, Hiroaki Tomita 1,2,3,4, Yasuyuki Taki 1,2,6, Naoko Minegishi 1,2, Naoto Ishii 1,2, Jun Yasuda 1,2, Kazuhiko Igarashi 1,2, Ritsuko Shimizu 1,2, Masao Nagasaki 1, Seizo Koshiba 1, Kengo Kinoshita 1,7, Soichi Ogishima 1, Takako Takai-Igarashi 1, Teiji Tominaga 1,2,4, Osamu Tanabe 1,2, Noriaki Ohuchi 1,2,4, Toru Shimosegawa 1,2,4, Shigeo Kure 1,2,4, Hiroshi Tanaka 1, Sadayoshi Ito 1,2,4, Jiro Hitomi 8,9, Kozo Tanno 8,9, Motoyuki Nakamura 8,9, Kuniaki Ogasawara 8,9, Seiichiro Kobayashi 8,9, Kiyomi Sakata 8,9, Mamoru Satoh 8,9,10, Atsushi Shimizu 8, Makoto Sasaki 8,9,10, Ryujin Endo 8,9, Kenji Sobue 8,9,10; the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Study Group*, Masayuki Yamamoto 1,2
PMCID: PMC5008970  PMID: 27374138

Abstract

The Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) and resulting tsunami of March 11, 2011 gave rise to devastating damage on the Pacific coast of the Tohoku region. The Tohoku Medical Megabank Project (TMM), which is being conducted by Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (ToMMo) and Iwate Medical University Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (IMM), has been launched to realize creative reconstruction and to solve medical problems in the aftermath of this disaster. We started two prospective cohort studies in Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures: a population-based adult cohort study, the TMM Community-Based Cohort Study (TMM CommCohort Study), which will recruit 80 000 participants, and a birth and three-generation cohort study, the TMM Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study (TMM BirThree Cohort Study), which will recruit 70 000 participants, including fetuses and their parents, siblings, grandparents, and extended family members. The TMM CommCohort Study will recruit participants from 2013 to 2016 and follow them for at least 5 years. The TMM BirThree Cohort Study will recruit participants from 2013 to 2017 and follow them for at least 4 years. For children, the ToMMo Child Health Study, which adopted a cross-sectional design, was also started in November 2012 in Miyagi Prefecture. An integrated biobank will be constructed based on the two prospective cohort studies, and ToMMo and IMM will investigate the chronic medical impacts of the GEJE. The integrated biobank of TMM consists of health and clinical information, biospecimens, and genome and omics data. The biobank aims to establish a firm basis for personalized healthcare and medicine, mainly for diseases aggravated by the GEJE in the two prefectures. Biospecimens and related information in the biobank will be distributed to the research community. TMM itself will also undertake genomic and omics research. The aims of the genomic studies are: 1) to construct an integrated biobank; 2) to return genomic research results to the participants of the cohort studies, which will lead to the implementation of personalized healthcare and medicine in the affected areas in the near future; and 3) to contribute the development of personalized healthcare and medicine worldwide. Through the activities of TMM, we will clarify how to approach prolonged healthcare problems in areas damaged by large-scale disasters and how useful genomic information is for disease prevention.

Key words: the Great East Japan Earthquake, Tohoku Medical Megabank Project, cohort study, biobank, genomic research

INTRODUCTION

The Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) of March 11, 2011 caused profound damage in wide areas of the Pacific coast of the Tohoku region of Japan.1 The tsunami hit the northeastern part of Honshu Island, and Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures were severely damaged (Figure 1). In total, 15 827 people were lost and 2559 remain missing in these three prefectures.2 As of December 10, 2015, 182 000 people were still evacuees throughout Japan.3 Nearly 80% of the hospitals in Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures were damaged,4 which severely affected the delivery of medical services. A detailed report of hospitals’ damage by the GEJE is available for Miyagi Prefecture.5

Figure 1. Location of Iwate Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, and Fukushima Prefecture and characteristics of the Great East Japan Earthquake
This panel shows a map of Japan highlighting the location of Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures in red. Fukushima Prefecture, shown in light red color, is not included in this project. These three prefectures are areas most affected by the earthquake. Tokyo is shown in yellow color. The letter X indicates the epicenter.

Figure 1.

Since the GEJE, many studies have reported that the survivors of the disaster are suffering various set-backs, including unbalanced nutrition; lack of appropriate medical follow-ups; and psychological stresses due to uncomfortable living conditions and the loss of family members, relatives, friends, and colleagues, as well as homes and places of work.6 These factors accelerate the onset of or aggravate a variety of chronic, non-infectious diseases, such as peptic ulcer,7 ulcerative colitis,8 cardiovascular disorders,916 cerebrovascular disorders,17 diabetes mellitus,18,19 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.20 Preceding acute-phase studies on the epidemiological impacts of the GEJE revealed that the earthquake caused prolonged social, economic, and psychological suffering among the victims and their communities. Also, middle- or long-term impacts of natural disasters, such as the GEJE, on the health of affected persons are concerning.21,22 Moreover, convincing lines of evidence regarding the impacts of the GEJE on child health are still lacking, despite the presence of great concern.23

Maintaining sustainable medical practices in the tsunami-affected areas was challenging and complicated even before the GEJE occurred. As the tsunami-stricken areas have continuously suffered from an unbalanced distribution of physicians,2426 simply reconstructing the damaged hospitals may not be sufficient to ensure stable restoration of medical services. Therefore, establishing an advanced medical system and practice is essential to the sustainable restoration of medical services in the tsunami-stricken areas. We surmise that personalized healthcare and medicine based on genomic information is one of the advanced medical practices that will support this purpose. Disease susceptibility and drug responsiveness are known to largely correlate with genetic factors, and personal genomic information can be an ultimate biomarker for many clinically important human traits.27

To this end, we established the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project (TMM), which is conducted by Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (ToMMo) and Iwate Medical University Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (IMM). We decided to conduct TMM in Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures (Figure 1 and Figure 2), since a number of similar large-scale projects have already been started in Fukushima Prefecture, including the Fukushima Health Management Survey,28 to promote the future well-being of their residents.

Figure 2. Municipalities of Miyagi Prefecture and Iwate Prefecture
This panel shows the municipalities of Miyagi Prefecture and Iwate Prefecture. Green area indicates study area. Red circles indicate the location of the Community Support Centers in Miyagi Prefecture and the Satellites in Iwate Prefecture.

Figure 2.

The mission of TMM is to facilitate solutions to medical problems in the aftermath of the GEJE by introducing personalized healthcare and medicine into the damaged areas. TMM has undertaken two prospective cohort studies in Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures. TMM also has contributed to the dispatch of young physicians to clinics and hospitals in the tsunami-suffered areas, and to the establishment of an integrated biobank equipped with an information-knowledge database that combines health and clinical information with data derived from genome analyses, such as whole-genome sequencing and custom-made single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. Biospecimens are being collected and stored in a manner that facilitates the full range of ‘omics’ analyses. Through these activities, we aim to realize personalized healthcare and medicine based on genetic and lifestyle information from the residents in the earthquake- and tsunami-damaged areas. These activities will be helpful in recovery efforts and in improving these residents’ health status. Our additional aim is to contribute to the restoration and development of the damaged areas by undertaking various research activities that utilize biospecimens and information in the biobank and database. This paper outlines the mission, methodology, and progress of TMM.

DESIGN

Outline of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project (TMM)

TMM started on February 1, 2012, with the goals of assisting medical and health services to overcome the damages from the GEJE, treating diseases among the survivors, and implementing the most advanced medical services, including personalized healthcare and medicine, for current and future generations in the affected areas. We also hope to expand the scope of the project to contribute to health promotion not only for persons in the affected areas, but also for the whole human family. TMM is sponsored by the Reconstruction Agency; the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT); and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). ToMMo and IMM are responsible for the operation and development of TMM (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Organization of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project (TMM)
TMM started on February 1, 2012, and is sponsored by the Reconstruction Agency, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). Panel shows the organization of TMM as of April 1, 2015.

Figure 3.

TMM mainly consists of three initiatives. First, we started two prospective cohort studies and one cross-sectional study. Second, we are constructing an integrated biobank that stores biospecimens and information collected through the cohort studies. Third, we perform regular genome and omics analyses with the collected biospecimens, and the resulting information will be stored in the biobank and distributed to the research community.

Cohort studies

The aims of TMM cohort studies are: 1) to monitor the effects of the damage caused by the GEJE on health status in the affected areas; 2) to contribute to the early diagnosis and treatment of potentially increasing diseases according to the results of the monitoring; and 3) to conduct molecular-epidemiological studies to clarify the associations between genetic factors, environmental factors, and diseases.

In order to conduct cohort studies in the affected areas, we first made efforts to recover the damaged healthcare services. In the affected areas, the shortage of physicians was critical even before the earthquake. To address this issue, we established a system to dispatch physicians to areas suffering from a physician shortage on a rotating basis. The system is called the “ToMMo Clinical Fellowship (TCF)” in Miyagi Prefecture and the “IMM Medical Megabank Fellows System” in Iwate Prefecture.

This physician dispatch system has many advantages. It offers advanced medical care to patients through the activities of young physicians involved in various specialties, and it aims to increase both the clinical and research expertise of young physicians, especially through clinical geneticist training (Figure 4). This physician dispatch system began on October 1, 2012. As of October 1, 2015, 40 physicians were dispatched to medical institutions in local communities, mainly along the Pacific coast. They have been working to support medical institutions in the affected areas, but they do not obtain consent from their patients or persons in the community to participate in the TMM cohort studies described below.

Figure 4. System of dispatching physicians on a rotating basis for community medical support and development of young resources
ToMMo, jointly with Tohoku University Hospital and Tohoku University School of Medicine, has created the system of dispatching physicians on a rotating basis, which connects communities with the university. The system is referred to as the “ToMMo Clinical Fellowship (TCF)”. IMM has also adopted the same system, and refers to it as the “IMM Medical Megabank Fellows System”.

Figure 4.

In May 2013, we started a population-based adult cohort study named the TMM Community-Based Cohort Study (TMM CommCohort Study), which targets 80 000 participants: 50 000 from Miyagi Prefecture and 30 000 from Iwate Prefecture (Table 1 and Figure 5). The main target population of the TMM CommCohort Study is persons living in coastal areas in these two prefectures (Figure 2), but the study also includes persons living in inland areas.

Table 1. Characteristics of two cohort studies and one cross-sectional study in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project (TMM).
  TMM Community-Based Cohort Study
(TMM CommCohort Study)
TMM Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study
(TMM BirThree Cohort Study)
ToMMo Child Health Study
Study design population and health checkup-based prospective cohort population and hospital-based prospective cohort school-based cross-sectional study
Recruitment or conduct period May 2013 to March 2016 July 2013 to September 2016 for pregnant women 2012 to 2015
  July 2013 to March 2017 for family members  
Number of total expected participants
 Miyagi Prefecture 50 000 (recuruited mainly by ToMMo) about 70 000 17 000
     (20 000 families)  
 Iwate Prefecture 30 000 (recuruited mainly by IMM) some 0
Ages 20 years old or older fetus, 0 years old or older school age, from 7 years old to 14 years old
Family information partially available almost fully available none
mainly partner’s information three-generation and extended-family information  
Main target diseases chronic diseases pregnant and perinatal period diseases allergic diseases
mental diseases allergic diseases developmental disorders
infectious diseases developmental disorders mental diseases
  chronic diseases infectious diseases
  mental diseases  
  infectious diseases  

TMM, Tohoku Medical Megabank Project; ToMMo, Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization; IMM, Iwate Medical University Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization.

Figure 5. Roadmap of the TMM cohort studies
This panel shows the roadmap for recruitment and follow-ups of the cohorts towards the realization of personalized healthcare and medicine.

Figure 5.

In the TMM CommCohort Study, we have been recruiting potential participants by two approaches. We recruit participants on the sites for specific health checkups of the annual community health examination, which are conducted by municipalities.29 The health checkups, which are conducted for insured persons aged from 40 to 74 years, focus on visceral fat obesity. Additionally, we have established facilities of seven “Community Support Centers” in Miyagi Prefecture and five “Satellites” in Iwate Prefecture for the voluntary admission-type recruitment and health assessment of participants (Figure 2).

The inclusion criteria for the TMM CommCohort Study are: 1) for the specific health checkups sites based survey, persons aged 40 to 74 years who are registered in the basic resident register of all 35 municipalities in Miyagi Prefecture and 20 municipalities in Iwate Prefecture (Figure 2) at the time of enrollment; and 2) for the Community Support Center or the Satellite based survey, persons aged 20 years or over who are registered in the basic resident register of all 35 municipalities in Miyagi Prefecture and 20 municipalities in Iwate Prefecture (Figure 2) at the time of enrollment. The exclusion criteria for the TMM CommCohort Study are: 1) persons who do not consent to participate in the study; and 2) persons who are not able to fill out study questionnaires. As of December 28, 2015, 53 882 persons in Miyagi Prefecture and 31 838 persons in Iwate Prefecture have already participated in the TMM CommCohort Study (Table 2A and Table 2B). Figure 6 shows the age distribution of these participants. As of December 28, 2015, the participation response rates among health checkup examinees recruited on the sites for specific health checkups to the TMM CommCohort were 65% in Miyagi Prefecture and 77% in Iwate Prefecture.

Table 2A. Municipalities, population, and human damage by the GEJEa and number of participants in the TMM CommCohort and the TMM BirThree Cohort Studies in Miyagi Prefecture.
Community
Support
Center
Municipality Population
(as of October 1,
2015)
Human
damage by
the GEJEa
Number of participants (as of December 28, 2015)

TMM CommCohort TMM BirThree Cohort


Specific
health
checkups
Community
Support
Center
Sub
total
Total
(n = 53 882)
Obstetric
clinics and
hospitals
Community
Support
Center
Othersb Sub
total
Total
(n = 44 309)
Kesennuma Kesennuma 65 372 1326 721 1303 2024 2557 845 150 8 1003 1245
  Minamisanriku 13 482 812 518 15 533   215 25 2 242  
Osaki Osaki 132 864 2 8504 947 9451 19 094 2722 166 53 2941 6982
  Kurihara 69 692 0 3589 148 3737   957 71 30 1058  
  Tome 80 677 4 2261 74 2335   1600 95 22 1717  
  Kami 23 841 0 982 51 1033   337 28 2 367  
  Shikama 7162 0 24 4 28   139 10 1 150  
  Wakuya 16 672 2 439 41 480   288 22 1 311  
  Misato 24 724 0 1903 127 2030   388 48 2 438  
Ishinomaki Ishinomaki 145 760 3705 1402 1154 2556 5355 1995 347 22 2364 3170
  Higashimatsushima 39 759 1086 2333 196 2529   628 84 16 728  
  Onagawa 6631 850 249 21 270   67 11 0 78  
Tagajo Shiogama 54 168 24 1311 462 1773 7901 531 112 8 651 2706
  Tagajo 62 314 188 2339 617 2956   1099 170 29 1298  
  Matsushima 14 499 2 972 59 1031   77 28 3 108  
  Shichigahama 18 709 78 894 98 992   150 34 4 188  
  Rifu 35 748 1 823 326 1149   363 90 8 461  
Sendai Sendai 1 076 030 685 49 4519 4568 9775 17 367 1636 358 19 361 21 332
  Taiwa 28 056 1 1499 71 1570   620 29 22 671  
  Osato 8331 1 308 15 323   80 9 5 94  
  Tomiya 51 544 0 3136 154 3290   989 69 33 1091  
  Ohira 5687 0 17 7 24   105 10 0 115  
Iwanuma Iwanuma 44 162 181 1242 552 1794 4437 1158 111 28 1297 4014
  Natori 77 041 951 663 482 1145   1431 152 29 1612  
  Watari 33 271 269 963 181 1144   758 86 9 853  
  Yamamoto 12 495 698 299 55 354   236 15 1 252  
Shiroishi Shiroishi 35 084 0 1116 526 1642 4757 749 61 7 817 4292
  Kakuda 29 819 0 435 117 552   610 79 4 693  
  Zao 12 300 0 771 81 852   253 23 7 283  
  Shichikashuku 1453 0   3 3   8 2 0 10  
  Ogawara 23 699 0 129 184 313   656 52 4 712  
  Murata 11 361 0 503 47 550   294 20 8 322  
  Shibata 39 104 2 16 221 237   930 75 28 1033  
  Kawasaki 9129 0 1 23 24   96 4 1 101  
  Marumori 14 043 0 565 19 584   293 28 0 321  
Municipalities other than Miyagi Prefecture 4 2 6 6 354 189 25 568 568

GEJE, Great East Japan Earthquake; TMM, Tohoku Medical Megabank Project.

aHuman damage by the GEJE includes dead and missing persons. The nubers are cited from the Miyagi Prefecture Crisis Measures division.

bOthers include participants’ house, event site, etc.

Table 2B. Municipalities, population, and human damage from the GEJEa and number of participants in the TMM CommCohort Study in Iwate Prefecture.
Center or Satellite Municipality Population
(as of October 1,
2015)
Human
damage by
the GEJEa
Number of participants (as of December 28, 2015)

Specific health
Table 1checkups
Satellite Sub total Total
(n = 31 838)
Yahaba Yahaba 27 191 0 790 996 1786 2482
  Tono 27 664 0 0 485 485  
  Ichinoseki 120 379 0 0 211 211  
Kuji Kuji 35 106 4 2374 455 2829 9953
  Hirono 16 322 0 1440 109 1549  
  Noda 4189 38 423 36 459  
  Fudai 2859 1 287 28 315  
  Ninohe 27 659 0 1858 43 1901  
  Karumai 9275 0 999 18 1017  
  Ichinohe 12 921 0 1270 15 1285  
  Kunohe 5973 0 568 30 598  
Miyako Miyako 55 017 514 4391 960 5351 8258
  Yamada 15 564 752 1620 25 1645  
  Iwaizumi 9579 7 848 107 955  
  Tanohata 3474 29 286 21 307  
Kamaishi Kamaishi 35 262 1040 2315 831 3146 4342
  Otsuchi 11 513 1227 1162 34 1196  
Kesen Ofunato 38 024 419 3256 572 3828 6803
  Rikuzentakata 19 097 1762 2398 64 2462  
  Sumita 5751 0 354 159 513  

GEJE, Great East Japan Earthquake; TMM, Tohoku Medical Megabank Project.

aHuman damage by the GEJE includes dead and missing persons. The numbers are cited from the General Disaster Prevention Office, Iwate Prefectural Government.

Figure 6. Age distribution of the TMM Community-Based Cohort (TMM CommCohort) participants
This panel shows the age-distribution of participants in the TMM CommCohort as of December 28, 2015, recruited in Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures combined.

Figure 6.

In July 2013, we also started a birth and three-generation cohort study named the TMM Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study (TMM BirThree Cohort Study) (Table 1 and Figure 5) in one obstetric clinic. The study has since expanded throughout Miyagi Prefecture, and about 50 obstetric clinics and hospitals are now participating in the recruiting process. The main target population of the TMM BirThree Cohort Study is persons living in all municipalities in Miyagi Prefecture (Figure 2). We are recruiting pregnant women at the obstetric clinics and hospitals for the TMM BirThree Cohort, as well as the Community Support Centers in ToMMo.

We plan to recruit approximately 70 000 participants from three generations for the TMM BirThree Cohort (Table 1). For pregnant women, inclusion criteria are: 1) pregnant women who are registered in the basic resident register of all 35 municipalities in Miyagi Prefecture and 20 municipalities in Iwate Prefecture (Figure 2) at the time of enrollment and whose expected date of delivery is later than February 1, 2014; and 2) pregnant women who visited cooperative obstetric clinics and hospitals in Miyagi Prefecture or one of the seven Community Support Centers in ToMMo. For fetuses and children, inclusion criteria are: 1) fetuses of pregnant women who participated in the study; and 2) siblings of fetuses who participated in the study, regardless of kinship. Finally, for fathers, grandparents, and other family members, inclusion criteria are: father, grandparents, and other family members of fetuses who participated in the study, regardless of kinship. The Exclusion criteria of the TMM BirThree Cohort Study are: 1) persons aged 16 years or over who do not consent to participate in the study; 2) children and fetuses whose legal representatives do not provide consent for them to participate in the study; 3) persons who are not able to fill out study questionnaires, except for children and fetuses; 4) pregnant women who are participating in another birth cohort study for the same pregnancy. As of December 28, 2015, 44 309 persons and 4375 fetuses have already participated in the TMM BirThree Cohort Study (Table 2A). Figure 7 shows the age distribution of 43 658 participants after excluding extended family members. As of December 28, 2015, the participation response rates among pregnant women recruited at obstetric clinics and hospitals for the TMM BirThree Cohort was 67%.

Figure 7. Age distribution of the TMM Birth and Three-Generation Cohort (TMM BirThree Cohort) participants
This panel shows the age distribution of children, mothers, fathers, and grandparents who participated in the TMM BirThree Cohort as of December 28, 2015, recruited in Miyagi Prefecture.

Figure 7.

At the time of writing, we have trained more than 200 Genome Medical Research Coordinators (GMRC), who are responsible for informing potential participants about our cohort studies and obtaining consent from them to participate. They are also collecting biospecimens and recording clinical data.

One of the major incentives for participating in the cohort studies is contributing to the implementation of advanced medicine for the next generation. Especially in the TMM BirThree Cohort Study, parents and grandparents seem to have a strong desire to maintain the health of children. Another incentive is receiving the results of blood and urine tests, as well as questionnaire data. We advise all participants to consult their home doctors or go to a hospital if their laboratory or physiological measurements results show any abnormalities. In recompense for their cooperation, we also pay participants 500 to 1000 yen. Additionally, in the TMM BirThree Cohort Study, we send anniversary goods on special occasions, such as a child’s birthday.

We conducted sample size calculation of the cohort studies as follows: In the TMM CommCohort Study, a sample size of 80 000 participants was required for genome-wide screening of gene-by-environment interactions, with minimum odds ratios ranging from 1.4 to 29.1. The sample size was calculated by QUANTO (the Division of Biostatistics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA), which is a program used to calculate the required sample size and power for genetic studies,30,31 under the following assumptions: 1–10% frequency for a risk allele, 10–30% environmental exposure frequency, 90% 5-years follow-up rate, 1–10% disease cumulative incidence, 80% power, and a type I error rate of 4.50 × 10−10 for genome-wide context (ie, approximately 1200 × 104 single nucleotide variations (SNVs) and 10 environmental factors). This size would also be sufficient to screen for marginal effects of a few genes or environmental factors.

In sample size calculation in the TMM BirThree Cohort Study, a sample size of approximately 70 000 participants from three generations was required for a multipurpose research platform, including haplotype phasing, parametric linkage analysis, cross-family identity by descent (IBD) mapping,32,33 and family-based association studies, such as the transmission-disequilibrium test (TDT) and the corrected chi-squared test. For example, in the corrected chi-squared test for genome-wide screening of marginal effects at each locus, approximately 20 000 trios gave 80% power to detect variants with odds ratios ranging from 1.4–3.0, assuming: 1–5% frequency for a risk allele, 1% disease prevalence, 80% power, and a type I error rate of 4.00 × 10−9 for genome-wide context (ie, approximately 1200 × 104 SNVs). In contrast, approximately 9000 seven-family member groups, all else being equal, would be enough to achieve comparable performance.

There is one more reason to support the calculated sample size for the TMM BirThree Cohort Study. In 2011, the number of annual births in Miyagi Prefecture was 18 062.34 If 50% of pregnant women agreed to participate, the number of participants per year would be 9031. Therefore, we set our target of over 20 000 pairs of pregnant women and their fetuses during the recruitment period. We also set targets of 10 000 fathers and 15 000 grandparents (10 000 maternal grandparents and 5000 paternal grandparents), considering the number of pregnant women and feasibility. In 2011, 47% of Japanese pregnant women were primipara.34 Thus, we can assume that approximately 50% of fetuses have siblings. We intend to recruit 50% (5000) of these siblings.

For children, we also conducted a cross-sectional study, the ToMMo Child Health Study, every year from 2012 to 2015 in Miyagi Prefecture (Table 1).35 This study aimed to investigate and support the health needs of schoolchildren affected by the GEJE. We asked all 35 municipal school boards in Miyagi Prefecture to participate in the study, and 28 of those agreed. The total number of eligible participants was 65 881, and approximately 17 000 (26%) agreed to participate in the study. We distributed the parent-administered questionnaire, which included questions for assessing physical and behavioral status.

The main target diseases of each study are listed in Table 1. We have selected these diseases because of concerns over the potential increase in their prevalence in the affected areas and/or the degree of disease burden on the population in general.

We have assessed many variables in detail. The variables include: 1) a wide range of questions, including sociodemographic factors, lifestyle habits, and medical history; 2) biospecimens’ measurements, including blood, urine, saliva, dental plaque, and breast milk; 3) physiological measurements, including height, weight, body composition, blood pressure or estimated central aortic blood pressure, heart rate, carotid ultrasound imaging, respiratory function, respiratory impedance, calcaneal ultrasound bone mineral density, leg extension strength, grip strength, oral examination, hearing acuity, eye examination, home blood pressure, number of steps per day, waist circumference, visceral fat by bioelectrical impedance analysis, electrocardiogram, pulse wave velocity, and flow mediated dilation; and 4) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The assessments, collections, and measurements vary depending on where participants undergo their health examinations. Table 3A and Table 3B show the assessments, collections, and measurements in participants who are 20 years old or over according to the Community Support Center in Miyagi Prefecture and the Satellite in Iwate Prefecture. The assessments, collections, and measurements in participants who are under 20 years old are selected among those in participants who are 20 years old or over considering safety and effectiveness.

Table 3A. Assessments, collections, and measurements in participants who are 20 years old or over according to the Community Support Center in Miyagi Prefecture.
Questions, biospecimens, or physiological measures Community Support Center

Sendai Kesennuma Ishinomaki Osaki Tagajo Iwanuma Shiroishi
Questions
Questionnaire + + + + + + +
Touchscreen questionnaire + + + + + + +
Biospecimens
Blood C C C C C C C
Urine + + + + + + +
Saliva + + + + + + +
Dental plaque + + + + + + +
Breast milk M M M M M M M
Physiological measurements
Height/Weight/Body composition + + + + + + +
Estimated central aortic blood pressure and heart rate + + + + + + +
Carotid ultrasound imaging + + + + + + +
Respiratory function NP NP NP NP NP NP NP
Respiratory impedance + + + + + + +
Calcaneal ultrasound bone mineral density + + + + + + +
Leg extension strength NP NP NP NP NP NP NP
Grip strength NP NP NP NP NP NP NP
Oral examination + + + + + + +
Hearing acuity + + + + + + +
Eye examination              
 Intraocular pressure + + + + + + +
 Color retinal photography + + + + + + +
 Axial length + + + + + + +
 Optical coherence tomography +     + + +  
 Refraction and keratometry +            
Home blood pressure V V V V V V V
Number of steps per day V V V V V V V
Magnetic Resonance Imaging VNP            

+ assessed, collected, or measured in all participants who visit the Community Support Center.

C collected in all participants who visit the Community Support Center. Umbilical cord blood is also collected at the time of birth at the obstetric clinics and hospitals.

M collected in participants who are mothers of newborn infants.

NP measured in participants who are not pregnant women.

V measured in participants on a voluntary basis.

VNP measured in participants who are not pregnant women or mothers of newborn infants within 6 months after birth on a voluntary basis.

Table 3B. Assessments, collections, and measurements in participants who are 20 years old or over according to the Satellite in Iwate Prefecture.
Questions, biospecimens, or physiological measures Center Satellite


Yahaba Kesen Kuji Miyako Kamaishi
Questions
Questionnaire + + + + +
Biospecimens          
Blood + + + + +
Urine + + + + +
Physiological measurements
Height/Weight + + + + +
Waist circumference + + + + +
Visceral fat by bioelectrical impedance analysis + + + + +
Blood pressure and heart rate + + + + +
Electrocardiogram + + + + +
Pulse wave velocity + + + + +
Carotid ultrasound imaging + + +    
Flow mediated dilation F F      
Calcaneal ultrasound bone mineral density + + + + +
Eye examination
 Color retinal photography + +      
 Axial length + +      
 Optical coherence tomography + +      

+ assessed, collected, or measured in all participants who visit the Satellite.

F measured in participants who are 50 years old or over.

In the TMM CommCohort Study and the TMM BirThree Cohort Study, we aim to obtain questionnaire data, blood, and urine from all participants. We also collect umbilical cord blood from newborn infants. We have performed physiological measurements of participants who visited the Community Support Centers or the Satellites (Table 3A and Table 3B). MRI is performed on a voluntary basis. As of December 28, 2015, in the TMM CommCohort Study, about 31% of participants in Miyagi Prefecture and 24% of participants in Iwate Prefecture have had physiological measurements, and about 3% of participants in Miyagi Prefecture have undergone MRI examinations. In the TMM BirThree Cohort Study, about 23% of participants have had physiological measurements, and about 2% of participants have undergone MRI examinations. We return the results of the examinations to participants to help improve their health status. If we observe any incidental findings in the laboratory data, except genome analyses, we immediately advise the participants to consult their home doctors or to go to a hospital within a month.

We have also adopted, in part, E-epidemiology,36 which aims to collect epidemiological information using electric devices, such as tablet computers and/or mobile phones. We are now partly collecting data using tablet computers and, in the near future, we are planning to collect follow-up data using the Internet.

In order to follow participants for morbidity and mortality, we adopted the following three strategies (Figure 5): 1) questionnaire by mail or use of E-epidemiology; 2) repeated health examinations at the Community Support Centers in Miyagi Prefecture and the Satellites in Iwate Prefecture; and 3) existing data review.

In Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures, morbidity is identified annually using mail or E-epidemiology. We believe that repeated health examinations at the Community Support Centers in Miyagi Prefecture and the Satellites in Iwate Prefecture are essential for follow-up because persons do not always consult physicians whether or not they have some symptoms when they have health problems. Also, repeated health examinations are important because detailed phenotype information, including various continuous and dichotomous variables, might not always be obtained in medical settings. Nevertheless, medical chart review is one of the most important strategies for reviewing existing data. Data in the available population-based cancer registry system can be used to confirm the incidence of cancer among the study participants. Data for death and moving out of the study areas are annually and biannually verified by reviewing the basic resident register in each municipality. Furthermore, data for the medical insurance system and long-term-care insurance system can be used to obtain information regarding morbidity and disability among the study participants.

In Miyagi Prefecture, ToMMo is considering reviewing an electronic health record (EHR) system called the Miyagi Medical and Welfare Information Network (MMWIN).37 The MMWIN is designed to unify medical and well-being data by converting traditional medical and health records to electronic files. Furthermore, for infants and schoolchildren, morbidity is also identified by reviewing the records of health check-ups conducted by municipalities and schools. Data in the system for intractable diseases and specific chronic diseases in childhood conducted by municipalities can also be used.

In Iwate Prefecture, IMM is also considering reviewing records of an EHR system when it becomes available. IMM has the methodological advantage of using data from available population-based stroke and heart disease registry systems to confirm the incidence of stroke and heart disease among study participants.

TMM aims to establish domestic and international collaborations between many other genome cohorts and biobanks to achieve the goals of personalized healthcare and medicine. For this purpose, we adopted questionnaires that share more than 90% of their content with other Japanese representative cohort studies, including the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study (J-MICC Study)38 and the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC Study).39 Furthermore, we referenced the “PhenX Tool kit”, which aims to create standard measures of environmental exposures to make it easy for investigators to collaborate with each other, when designing our questionnaires.40

Biobanking

TMM will establish an integrated biobank based on the above-mentioned cohort studies (Figure 8). Because the biospecimens will be depleted over the course of the biobank operation, we decided to conduct routine genome and omics analyses at the ToMMo and IMM research centers and to distribute the information along with the biospecimens. We refer to this idea as the integrated biobank.

Figure 8. Construction of an integrated biobank
We are constructing an integrated biobank, which consists of biospecimens and data of genome and omics linked to de-identified health and clinical information of cohort study participants.

Figure 8.

The content of biospecimens that we are collecting, as well as the methods for collection and storage, are summarized in Figure 9. As the details of this biobanking process will be reported in a separate paper, here we only briefly describe the issues. One of the important improvements that TMM is adopting is to actively and systemically incorporate laboratory automation and a laboratory information management system to handle and store biospecimens from the participants (Figure 9).

Figure 9. Laboratory automation and a laboratory information management system in TMM
This panel shows how TMM handles and stores biospecimens from participants in the TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

Figure 9.

We are planning to facilitate the implementation of personalized healthcare and medicine with well-controlled governance of the biobank management system. The system will transfer the biospecimens and data to the researchers most suited to maximizing their potential. In this way, the biobank will serve as the foundation for developing preventive and treatment methods based on genetic and environmental influences on the onset of diseases.

We will adopt a materials and data transfer policy, which will contribute to the reconstruction of the affected areas. Biobank users are expected to contribute to the conduct of research that targets the potentially increasing diseases in the affected areas and will engage in research that will attract medical industries to these areas.

As one of the representative repositories of biospecimens and data in Japan, we will make every effort to appropriately manage the biobank to meet international standards. The biospecimens and data in our biobank will be shared with many researchers, who may discover mechanisms to explain why some people develop specific diseases while others do not. In addition to genome analysis, TMM will also perform omics analyses, such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, in the prospective cohort settings.

Genomic research

Although our biobank aims to serve as the foundation for personalized healthcare and medicine and for developing future preventive and treatment methods by making the biospecimens and data available to the scientific community, we also plan to conduct genomic and omics researches ourselves. The aims of our genomic research are: 1) to construct an integrated biobank as described above; 2) to return genomic research results to the participants of the cohort studies, which will lead to the implementation of personalized healthcare and medicine in the affected areas in the near future; and 3) to contribute to the development of personalized healthcare and medicine worldwide. Our use of any biospecimens and data will be done with permission from the Sample and Data Access Committee of the biobank.

To achieve these aims, the analyzed genomic and omics information will be combined with information derived from the cohort surveys and will be utilized to determine how genetic and environmental factors are linked to diseases. Moreover, the information will be used to create databases for more advanced medicine.

We aim to return the results of genome analysis to the participants and to the medical community to implement personalized healthcare and medicine in the near future. To this end, we plan to generate a Japanese reference panel of genomic variation to elucidate the characteristics of the Japanese genome, to open the panel to researchers, and to create a custom-made SNP array (“Japonica Array”)41 to detect susceptibility loci to common complex diseases (Figure 10). This strategy will uniquely utilize familial imputation based on the TMM BirThree Cohort, as the usefulness of the realized IBD concept has been recognized32,33 and the power of familial imputation has been demonstrated in the deCODE project.42,43

Figure 10. Genome analysis strategies within TMM
This panel shows the genome analysis strategies within TMM to realize personalized healthcare and medicine.

Figure 10.

We have already created one Japanese reference panel of genomic variation, the integrative Japanese Genome Variation Database, which is publicly available online (http://ijgvd.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/)44 and includes allele frequencies of all SNVs. The database is based on the whole-genome sequencing of 1070 samples from the TMM CommCohort, and average sequencing coverage was 32.4×. The database has several distinctive characteristics (Table 4)44 and will elucidate DNA sequence variations in the Japanese population.

Table 4. Characteristics of a Japanese reference panel of genomic variation, the integrative Japanese Genome Variation Database.
Participants One population of Japanese
Library source Genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood cells
Sequencing target Whole genome
Analysis Setting One setting at Tohoku University using Illumina HiSeq 2500
Coverage 32.4 × on average

As mentioned above, the synergetic effects of the TMM CommCohort and the TMM BirThree Cohort will enhance the capture of rare variants with a high degree of accuracy. To achieve this, we will utilize a standard panel of genomic variation based on the next-generation sequencing analysis of the population-based cohort data coupled with familial genotype imputation into the birth and three-generation cohort data (Figure 11).

Figure 11. Complementary cooperation of the TMM Community-Based Cohort (TMM CommCohort) and the TMM Birth and Three-Generation Cohort (TMM BirThree Cohort) in genome analyses
This panel shows synergetic effects of the TMM CommCohort and the TMM BirThree Cohort.

Figure 11.

Omics research is also a big component of our work. We have completed multi-omics (metabolome and proteome) analysis of 500 plasma samples collected from the TMM CommCohort Study. These data have been integrated into the “Japanese Multi Omics Reference Panel (jMorp)” database, which is publicly available online (https://jmorp.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/). This research may provide biomarker profiles for the early detection of diseases. In our omics study, ToMMo is mainly in charge of proteomics and metabolomics, while IMM is mainly in charge of epigenetics and transcriptomics.

Ethical issues

We inform eligible persons of the aims and protocols of TMM and obtained written informed consent from all who agree to participate according to their free will. We adopt general and continuing consent to participate in TMM. At baseline, we explain the protocols applied in the cohort studies, biobanking, and general research methods for genome analyses, omics analyses, and cell culture, which is not intended to differentiate germ-line cells or organ cells. During the follow-up period, we will inform participants of individual research protocols through newsletters, web pages, and/or other communication tools after the researchers have defined the protocol. For the TMM BirThree Cohort Study, participants with parental authority, such as parents or guardians, provide written informed consent for their children to participate in the study.

TMM protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine for ToMMo and by the Ethics Committee of Iwate Medical University for IMM. TMM is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki,45 Ethical Guidelines for Human Genome/Gene Analysis Research,46 and all other applicable guidelines.

DISCUSSION

TMM has two goals: to contribute to reconstruction after the GEJE and to implement personalized healthcare and medicine. To achieve these goals, we have designed the protocols with the following features: 1) compatibility of health improvement and observational study; 2) strategic cohort designs; 3) general and continuing consent; 4) follow-up with an EHR system; 5) an integrated biobank that will contribute to the health of affected persons; and 6) rapid genome analyses following cohort establishment and potential return of genome analysis results.

Compatibility of health improvement and observational study

A prospective cohort study is an observational epidemiological method that allows limited intervention to improve participants’ health even when researchers find modifiable factors present in the participants. The design aims to observe exposures and subsequent outcomes. Nevertheless, we have decided to intervene when we find modifiable factors at baseline or at follow-up health assessments, since our studies are being conducted in the earthquake- and tsunami-affected areas. Additionally, we immediately advise participants to consult their home doctors or go to a hospital if abnormalities in laboratory or physiological measurements are detected. To appropriately evaluate the intervention effects, we will repeatedly monitor the exposures and outcomes through follow-up every year by mail and every 5 years by reassessments. To monitor health improvements among the participants, both children and adults, we will continuously check official public data to evaluate mortality, morbidity, or disabilities.

Strategic cohort designs

We have employed two prospective cohort designs. One is a population-based adult cohort study, the TMM CommCohort Study, while the other is a birth and three-generation cohort study, the TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

For the TMM CommCohort study, we have recruited participants mainly from specific health checkup sites, which cover about 76% of the participants in Miyagi Prefecture and about 84% of those in Iwate Prefecture. The study has some limitations. Because those who undergo specific health checkups are more likely to be older and women, the number of young participants and men in our study is relatively small. Our participants might also have a high level of health consciousness, since they attended health checkups. Additionally, our recruitment sites are those that conduct mass examinations and do not include individual medical institutes conducting specific health checkups, so the study population in the recruitment sites might not sufficiently represent the target population (Table 2A and Table 2B). Nevertheless, the TMM CommCohort Study has a large sample size, detailed data (including MRI data), and follow-up with an EHR system.

The TMM BirThree Cohort Study is, to our knowledge, the first of its kind in the world. Family members have been traditionally included in research that investigates single-gene diseases. However, we developed a three-generation design because we believe that this could potentially have the power to detect clues to explain gene-environment related diseases. As has been discussed by Stolk et al, a three-generation design has the advantages of finding de novo variation and directing haplotype assessment.47 The potential importance of the use of a three-generation design is also suggested by a study showing that advanced grandparental age was associated with increased risk of autism.48

To our knowledge, the only relatively large-scale population-based cohort study with a three-generation design is the “LifeLines Cohort Study (LifeLines)” in the Netherlands.47,49 LifeLines has many potential advantages for personalized healthcare and medicine, because sufficient family information is collected. One salient difference between LifeLines and TMM is that LifeLines recruited children but not fetuses.49 Childhood recruitment may not allow sufficient investigation of in utero exposures. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis indicates that the fetal environments may strongly influence subsequent health in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood.5052 Our TMM BirThree Cohort Study design is a prospective cohort from early fetal life onward and could therefore allow us to decipher interactions between genes and lifetime environmental factors.

For children, we also conducted the ToMMo Child Health Study in Miyagi Prefecture for school-aged children, in addition to the two cohort studies (Table 1).35 Through our two prospective cohort studies and one cross-sectional study, we are able to assess the health status of residents of all ages, from fetuses to elderly persons. Including all ages is necessary because persons of all ages have been affected by the GEJE and will demand advanced medicine for potentially increasing diseases in the near future.

Combining population-based and family-based cohort studies like TMM is quite efficient in elucidating interactions between genetic and environmental factors and in deciphering the etiology of common complex diseases, which are derived from gene-environment interactions and affected by rare variants (Figure 10 and Figure 11).53 Indeed, Styrkarsdottir et al identified four new genome-wide significant loci harboring a rare predisposing variant in a study of bone mineral density using methods similar to those mentioned above for the deCODE project.54

Our study sites include not only severely affected coastal areas but also inland areas in Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures to allow for adjustment of the effects of the GEJE on the cohorts. Furthermore, to validate our results and to obtain sufficient statistical power, we will compare the results of our cohort studies with those conducted in other areas of Japan, which include both prospective and case-control designs.38,39,5560

General and continuing consent

In the biobanking project, sufficient informed consent at the time of study enrollment is, in general, believed to be practically impossible.61 To maximize participants’ hopes for personalized healthcare and medicine, we adopted general and continuing consent to participate in the TMM cohort studies.

We will continuously provide detailed protocol information of individual research methods once the protocols have been determined. Also, we plan to contact the participants once a year, at which time we will obtain, if necessary, re-consent to participate in TMM according to the progression of the study.

Follow-up with an EHR system

Data from the integrated EHR system will be gradually used as a data source to follow participants in our cohorts.62,63 The EHR generally includes laboratory testing results, disease diagnoses, and treatment information, including use of medications. To our knowledge, there has been no cohort study with follow-up of participants linked to EHR in Japan.

Integrated biobank

The integrated biobank of TMM consists of biospecimens and genome and omics data linked to de-identified health and clinical information of the cohort studies’ participants. We aim to establish the TMM biobank to maximize the potential of the biospecimens and data and to contribute to realize advanced personalized healthcare and medicine.

The TMM biobank has a unique policy of transferring biospecimens to researchers who can aid persons affected by the GEJE, because the biobank’s primary aim is to reconstruct the affected areas.

Rapid genome analyses and potential return of genomic research results

Genomic research in TMM includes construction of an integrated biobank and potential return of genome analysis results to implement personalized healthcare and medicine. There are at least a few population studies that have revealed genomic information to participants. One example is a Finnish cohort study that returned information regarding long QT syndrome genes.64 Although many barriers must first be addressed before the return of genome analysis results to participants, we have started to consider ethical, legal, and social issues of returning such information and implementing personalized healthcare and medicine.

Conclusion

We have launched a novel project TMM to recover from the GEJE and to address diseases related to the disaster, including the TMM strategic cohort studies, biobanking, and genomic research. TMM will serve present and future generations by providing personalized healthcare and medicine.

ONLINE ONLY MATERIAL

eAppendix 1. The Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Study Group members.
je-26-493-s001.pdf (18.9KB, pdf)
Abstract in Japanese.
je-26-493-s002.pdf (163.4KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

TMM is supported by grants from the Reconstruction Agency, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), and from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).

The authors sincerely express their gratitude to the people of Japan and of the world for the valuable support to the Great East Japan Earthquake affected areas after the disaster. We thank the members of ToMMo and IMM, including GMRCs, office and administrative personnel, and software engineers, for their assistance to the projects. The full list of members is available at: http://www.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/english/a150601/ for ToMMo and http://iwate-megabank.org/en/about/departments/ for IMM. We also thank Dr. Hiroko Matsubara for her technical assistance.

Conflicts of interest: None declared.

Role of the sponsor: The Reconstruction Agency, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) had no role in the design or conduct of the study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cabinet Office, Government of Japan [homepage on the Internet]. White paper on disaster management 2011 [cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.bousai.go.jp/kaigirep/hakusho/pdf/WPDM2011_Summary.pdf.
  • 2.National Police Agency [homepage on the Internet]. Damage situation and police countermeasures 2015 [updated 2016 Jan 8; cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/index_e.htm.
  • 3.Reconstruction Agency, Government of Japan [homepage on the Internet]. Number of refugees 2015 [updated 2015 Dec 25; cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat2/sub-cat2-1/20151225_hinansha.pdf (in Japanese).
  • 4.Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Government of Japan [homepage on the Internet]. Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Government of Japan [updated 2012 Oct 23; cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kokusaigyomu/asean/2012/dl/Introduction_Dr.Yamauchi.pdf.
  • 5.Satomi S. The Great East Japan Earthquake: Tohoku University Hospital’s efforts and lessons learned. Surg Today. 2011;41:1171–81. 10.1007/s00595-011-4587-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ochi S, Murray V, Hodgson S. The Great East Japan Earthquake disaster: a compilation of published literature on health needs and relief activities, March 2011–September 2012. PLoS Curr. 2013;5:ecurrents.dis.771beae7d8f41c31cd91e765678c005d. doi:10.1371/currents.dis.771beae7d8f41c31cd91e765678c005d. 10.1371/currents.dis.771beae7d8f41c31cd91e765678c005d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kanno T, Iijima K, Abe Y, Koike T, Shimada N, Hoshi T, et al. . Peptic ulcers after the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami: possible existence of psychosocial stress ulcers in humans. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:483–90. 10.1007/s00535-012-0681-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shiga H, Miyazawa T, Kinouchi Y, Takahashi S, Tominaga G, Takahashi H, et al. . Life-event stress induced by the Great East Japan Earthquake was associated with relapse in ulcerative colitis but not Crohn’s disease: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002294 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002294. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aoki T, Fukumoto Y, Yasuda S, Sakata Y, Ito K, Takahashi J, et al. . The Great East Japan Earthquake disaster and cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2796–803. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aoki T, Takahashi J, Fukumoto Y, Yasuda S, Ito K, Miyata S, et al. . Effect of the Great East Japan Earthquake on cardiovascular diseases—report from the 10 hospitals in the disaster area. Circ J. 2013;77:490–3. 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nakamura M, Tanaka F, Nakajima S, Honma M, Sakai T, Kawakami M, et al. . Comparison of the incidence of acute decompensated heart failure before and after the major tsunami in Northeast Japan. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1856–60. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nozaki E, Nakamura A, Abe A, Kagaya Y, Kohzu K, Sato K, et al. . Occurrence of cardiovascular events after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami disaster. Int Heart J. 2013;54:247–53. 10.1536/ihj.54.247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tanaka F, Makita S, Ito T, Onoda T, Sakata K, Nakamura M. Relationship between the seismic scale of the 2011 northeast Japan earthquake and the incidence of acute myocardial infarction: A population-based study. Am Heart J. 2015;169:861–9. 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Niiyama M, Tanaka F, Nakajima S, Itoh T, Matsumoto T, Kawakami M, et al. . Population-based incidence of sudden cardiac and unexpected death before and after the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Iwate, northeast Japan. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000798. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.000798. 10.1161/JAHA.114.000798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yamaki T, Nakazato K, Kijima M, Maruyama Y, Takeishi Y. Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake on acute myocardial infarction in Fukushima prefecture. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8:212–9. 10.1017/dmp.2014.37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamauchi H, Yoshihisa A, Iwaya S, Owada T, Sato T, Suzuki S, et al. . Clinical features of patients with decompensated heart failure after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:94–9. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.02.057. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.02.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Omama S, Yoshida Y, Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Ishibashi Y, Nakamura M, et al. . Influence of the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami 2011 on occurrence of cerebrovascular diseases in Iwate, Japan. Stroke. 2013;44:1518–24. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ogawa S, Ishiki M, Nako K, Okamura M, Senda M, Sakamoto T, et al. . Effects of the Great East Japan Earthquake and huge tsunami on glycaemic control and blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000830. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000830. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Satoh H, Ohira T, Hosoya M, Sakai A, Watanabe T, Ohtsuru A, et al. . Evacuation after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident is a cause of diabetes: Results from the Fukushima Health Management Survey. J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:627390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kobayashi S, Hanagama M, Yamanda S, Satoh H, Tokuda S, Kobayashi M, et al. . Impact of a large-scale natural disaster on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the aftermath of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Respir Investig. 2013;51:17–23. 10.1016/j.resinv.2012.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guha-Sapir D, van Panhuis WG, Lagoutte J. Short communication: patterns of chronic and acute diseases after natural disasters—a study from the International Committee of the Red Cross field hospital in Banda Aceh after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:1338–41. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01932.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hung KK, Lam EC, Chan EY, Graham CA. Disease pattern and chronic illness in rural China: the Hong Kong Red Cross basic health clinic after 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25:252–9. 10.1111/1742-6723.12080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brandenburg MA, Watkins SM, Brandenburg KL, Schieche C. Operation Child-ID: Reunifying children with their legal guardians after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters. 2007;31:277–87. 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01009.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ishii T. Medical response to the Great East Japan Earthquake in Ishinomaki City. Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2011;2:10–6. doi:10.5365/WPSAR.2011.2.4.005. 10.5365/WPSAR.2011.2.4.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nohara M. Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami on health, medical care and public health systems in Iwate Prefecture, Japan, 2011. Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2011;2. doi:10.5365/wpsar.2011.2.4.002. 10.5365/wpsar.2011.2.4.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ochi S, Nakagawa A, Lewis J, Hodgson S, Murray V. The Great East Japan Earthquake disaster: distribution of hospital damage in Miyagi Prefecture. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29:245–53. 10.1017/S1049023X14000521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:793–5. 10.1056/NEJMp1500523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yasumura S, Hosoya M, Yamashita S, Kamiya K, Abe M, Akashi M, et al. ; Fukushima Health Management Survey Group . Study protocol for the Fukushima Health Management Survey. J Epidemiol. 2012;22:375–83. 10.2188/jea.JE20120105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Government of Japan [homepage on the Internet]. Specific health checkups and specific health guidance [cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw3/dl/2-007.pdf.
  • 30.Murcray CE, Lewinger JP, Conti DV, Thomas DC, Gauderman WJ. Sample size requirements to detect gene-environment interactions in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2011;35:201–10. doi:10.1002/gepi.20569. 10.1002/gepi.20569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gauderman WJ. Sample size requirements for matched case-control studies of gene-environment interaction. Stat Med. 2002;21:35–50. 10.1002/sim.973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Powell JE, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:800–5. 10.1038/nrg2865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Browning SR, Browning BL. Identity by descent between distant relatives: detection and applications. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:617–33. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Government of Japan [homepage on the Internet]. Vital statistics of Japan, Natality, 2011 [updated 2012 Sep 6; cited 2016 Jan 12]. Available from: http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/ListE.do?lid=000001101883.
  • 35.Kikuya M, Miyashita M, Yamanaka C, Ishikuro M, Sato Y, Obara T, et al. . Protocol and research perspectives of the ToMMo Child Health Study after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015;236:123–30. 10.1620/tjem.236.123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ekman A, Litton JE. New times, new needs; e-epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:285–92. 10.1007/s10654-007-9119-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miyagi Medical and Welfare Information Network [homepage on the Internet]. MMWIN [updated 2015 Dec 21; cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://mmwin.or.jp/ (in Japanese).
  • 38.Hamajima N; J-MICC Study Group . The Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study (J-MICC Study) to detect gene-environment interactions for cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8:317–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Watanabe S, Tsugane S, Sobue T, Konishi M, Baba S. Study design and organization of the JPHC study. Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study on cancer and cardiovascular diseases. J Epidemiol. 2001;11(6 Suppl):S3–7. 10.2188/jea.11.6sup_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.RTI International [homepage on the Internet]. PhenX Toolkit [updated 2016 Jan 16; cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.phenxtoolkit.org/.
  • 41.Kawai Y, Mimori T, Kojima K, Nariai N, Danjoh I, Saito R, et al. . Japonica array: improved genotype imputation by designing a population-specific SNP array with 1070 Japanese individuals. J Hum Genet. 2015;60:581–7. doi:10.1038/jhg.2015.68. 10.1038/jhg.2015.68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kong A, Masson G, Frigge ML, Gylfason A, Zusmanovich P, Thorleifsson G, et al. . Detection of sharing by descent, long-range phasing and haplotype imputation. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1068–75. 10.1038/ng.216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kong A, Steinthorsdottir V, Masson G, Thorleifsson G, Sulem P, Besenbacher S, et al. . Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature. 2009;462:868–74. 10.1038/nature08625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nagasaki M, Yasuda J, Katsuoka F, Nariai N, Kojima K, Kawai Y, et al. . Rare variant discovery by deep whole-genome sequencing of 1070 Japanese Individuals. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8018. doi:10.1038/ncomms9018. 10.1038/ncomms9018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.The 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 [homepage on the Internet]. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki [updated 2008 Oct; cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf.
  • 46.Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry [homepage on the Internet]. Ethical guidelines for human genome/gene analysis research [updated 2013 Feb 8; cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.lifescience.mext.go.jp/files/pdf/n1115_01.pdf (in Japanese).
  • 47.Stolk RP, Rosmalen JG, Postma DS, de Boer RA, Navis G, Slaets JP, et al. . Universal risk factors for multifactorial diseases: LifeLines: a three-generation population-based study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23:67–74. 10.1007/s10654-007-9204-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Frans EM, Sandin S, Reichenberg A, Långström N, Lichtenstein P, McGrath JJ, et al. . Autism risk across generations: a population-based study of advancing grandpaternal and paternal age. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:516–21. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Scholtens S, Smidt N, Swertz MA, Bakker SJ, Dotinga A, Vonk JM, et al. . Cohort Profile: LifeLines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1172–80. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu229. 10.1093/ije/dyu229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barker DJ. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med. 2007;261:412–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jaddoe VW, van Duijn CM, Franco OH, van der Heijden AJ, van Iizendoorn MH, de Jongste JC, et al. . The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2012. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:739–56. 10.1007/s10654-012-9735-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Henderson J, et al. . Cohort Profile: the ‘children of the 90s’; the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:111–27. 10.1093/ije/dys064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, et al. . Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461:747–53. 10.1038/nature08494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Styrkarsdottir U, Thorleifsson G, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Sigurdsson A, Jonasdottir A, et al. . Nonsense mutation in the LGR4 gene is associated with several human diseases and other traits. Nature. 2013;497:517–20. 10.1038/nature12124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Katsuki S, Hirota Y, Akazome T, Takeya S, Omae T, Takano S. Epidemiological studies on cerebrovascular diseases in Hisayama, Kyushu Island, Japan I. with particular reference to cardiovascular status. Jpn Heart J. 1964;5:12–36. 10.1536/ihj.5.12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sato M, Hozawa A, Konta T, Shao L, Otani K, Narimatsu H, et al. . Relationship between dietary intake and microalbuminuria: findings from the Takahata study. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2012;16:147–55. 10.1007/s10157-011-0539-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yamazaki T, Yamori M, Asai K, Nakano-Araki I, Yamaguchi A, Takahashi K, et al. . Mastication and risk for diabetes in a Japanese population: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64113. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064113. Print 2013. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata K, Toda E, Tsukamoto N, Hasegawa M, et al. . Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014. Jan 10;14:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-25. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hirayama A, Sugimoto M, Suzuki A, Hatakeyama Y, Enomoto A, Harada S, et al. . Effects of processing and storage conditions on charged metabolomic profiles in blood. Electrophoresis. 2015. Mar 28. doi:10.1002/elps.201400600. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1002/elps.201400600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nakamura Y. The BioBank Japan Project. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2007;5:696–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Chang C, Hong H, Kobayashi I, Suzuki S, et al. . For what am I participating? The need for communication after receiving consent from biobanking project participants: experience in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2011;56:358–63. 10.1038/jhg.2011.19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Schmittdiel JA, Adams SR, Segal J, Griffin MR, Roumie CL, Ohnsorg K, et al. . Novel use and utility of integrated electronic health records to assess rates of prediabetes recognition and treatment: brief report from an integrated electronic health records pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:565–8. 10.2337/dc13-1223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cross DS, McCarty CA, Steinhubl SR, Carey DJ, Erlich PM. Development of a multi-institutional cohort to facilitate cardiovascular disease biomarker validation using existing biorepository samples linked to electronic health records. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36:486–91. 10.1002/clc.22146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Haukkala A, Kujala E, Alha P, Salomaa V, Koskinen S, Swan H, et al. . The return of unexpected research results in a biobank study and referral to health care for heritable long QT syndrome. Public Health Genomics. 2013;16:241–50. doi:10.1159/000354105. 10.1159/000354105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

eAppendix 1. The Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Study Group members.
je-26-493-s001.pdf (18.9KB, pdf)
Abstract in Japanese.
je-26-493-s002.pdf (163.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES