Skip to main content
EMBO Molecular Medicine logoLink to EMBO Molecular Medicine
. 2016 Jul 7;8(9):1019–1038. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201506159

SLC25A46 is required for mitochondrial lipid homeostasis and cristae maintenance and is responsible for Leigh syndrome

Alexandre Janer 1,2, Julien Prudent 2,3,, Vincent Paupe 1,2,, Somayyeh Fahiminiya 1, Jacek Majewski 1, Nicolas Sgarioto 2, Christine Des Rosiers 4,5, Anik Forest 4,5, Zhen‐Yuan Lin 6, Anne‐Claude Gingras 6,7, Grant Mitchell 8, Heidi M McBride 2,3, Eric A Shoubridge 1,2,
PMCID: PMC5009808  PMID: 27390132

Abstract

Mitochondria form a dynamic network that responds to physiological signals and metabolic stresses by altering the balance between fusion and fission. Mitochondrial fusion is orchestrated by conserved GTPases MFN1/2 and OPA1, a process coordinated in yeast by Ugo1, a mitochondrial metabolite carrier family protein. We uncovered a homozygous missense mutation in SLC25A46, the mammalian orthologue of Ugo1, in a subject with Leigh syndrome. SLC25A46 is an integral outer membrane protein that interacts with MFN2, OPA1, and the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) complex. The subject mutation destabilizes the protein, leading to mitochondrial hyperfusion, alterations in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) morphology, impaired cellular respiration, and premature cellular senescence. The MICOS complex is disrupted in subject fibroblasts, resulting in strikingly abnormal mitochondrial architecture, with markedly shortened cristae. SLC25A46 also interacts with the ER membrane protein complex EMC, and phospholipid composition is altered in subject mitochondria. These results show that SLC25A46 plays a role in a mitochondrial/ER pathway that facilitates lipid transfer, and link altered mitochondrial dynamics to early‐onset neurodegenerative disease and cell fate decisions.

Keywords: Leigh syndrome, mitochondrial architecture, phospholipid transfer, SLC25A46

Subject Categories: Genetics, Gene Therapy & Genetic Disease; Metabolism; Neuroscience

Introduction

Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that change their morphology in response to physiological signals and metabolic stresses. This is achieved by altering the balance between fusion and fission, and by changes in the architecture of the organelle itself, in particular the invaginations of the inner mitochondrial membrane, the cristae, that house the protein complexes of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system. In mammals mitochondrial fusion is mediated by dynamin‐related GTPases on the outer membrane (MFN1, MFN2) and by OPA1 on the inner membrane. Fusion of the mitochondrial network occurs in response to stress (Tondera et al, 2009; Shutt et al, 2012), in conditions of nutrient deprivation (Gomes et al, 2011; Rambold et al, 2011), and during the G1/S phase of the cell cycle (Mitra et al, 2009). Dominantly inherited neurological phenotypes are caused by mutations in profusion proteins: MFN2 mutations are associated with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 2A (Zuchner et al, 2004) and mutations in OPA1 are the major cause of dominantly inherited optic atrophy (Alexander et al, 2000; Delettre et al, 2000). OPA1 has an additional role in the maintenance of cristae morphology and its remodeling in response to metabolic signals (Frezza et al, 2006; Meeusen et al, 2006). For example, apoptotic stimuli promote cristae opening, allowing release of cytochrome c (Scorrano et al, 2002; Frezza et al, 2006), nutrient availability modulates cristae number and structure (Patten et al, 2014; Sood et al, 2014), cristae shape modulates respiration through the assembly of respiratory chain super complexes (Cogliati et al, 2013), and stabilization of cristae, by mild overexpression of OPA1, can protect against ischemic insults and muscle atrophy (Civiletto et al, 2015; Varanita et al, 2015). The cleaved form of Opa1 is not required for fusion, but contributes to mitochondrial division, indicating a highly regulated, dual role for this GTPase in fusion and fission (Anand et al, 2014). These studies demonstrate that dynamic transitions in mitochondrial architecture are essential to tune mitochondrial function to the changing needs of the cell.

In yeast, mitochondrial fusion requires a third player, Ugo1, which associates with the homologues of MFN2 (Fzo1 in yeast) and OPA1 (Mgm1 in yeast) (Sesaki & Jensen, 2004). Ugo1, a degenerate member of the mitochondrial metabolite carrier family, is a multispan outer membrane protein that assembles independent of the conventional protein import machinery (Vogtle et al, 2015), and is thought to coordinate fusion of the outer and inner mitochondrial membranes, perhaps playing a role in lipid mixing downstream of mitochondrial tethering (Hoppins et al, 2009). Ugo1 also appears to play an important additional role in the maintenance of cristae architecture, as mitochondria in Ugo1 deletion strains are practically devoid of cristae and have very few contact sites between the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes (Harner et al, 2011).

Mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) is a recently discovered complex, consisting of at least seven proteins in a complex of about 700 kDa, that is indispensible for the maintenance of mitochondrial cristae junctions (Harner et al, 2011; Hoppins et al, 2011; van der Laan et al, 2012; Pfanner et al, 2014; Guarani et al, 2015). An evolutionary analysis of MICOS showed a widespread distribution of the central MICOS proteins among eukaryotes, and loss of the complex in organisms with simplified cristae, underscoring the ancient origins and importance of MICOS in cristae formation (Munoz‐Gomez et al, 2015; Huynen et al, 2016). Disruption of this complex results in detachment of membrane contact sites, producing parallel stacks of cristae that have lost the connection between the inner boundary membrane and the outer mitochondrial membrane (Harner et al, 2011; Hoppins et al, 2011; van der Laan et al, 2012). Thus, both MICOS, OPA1, and Ugo1 have important roles in the maintenance of cristae architecture, but how they interact is not yet clear.

Here, we show that a member of the mitochondrial metabolite carrier family, SLC25A46, that we found mutated in Leigh syndrome, an early‐onset neurodegenerative disease, is the likely orthologue of Ugo1. A recent study reported mutations in SLC25A46 in patients with optic atrophy, axonal Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT), and cerebellar atrophy (Abrams et al, 2015), and in a patient with an optic atrophy spectrum disorder (Nguyen et al, 2016), but neither study elucidated its molecular function. We show that SLC25A46 functions upstream of the MICOS complex and is required for the maintenance of mitochondrial cristae architecture. We further identified interactions with the ER/mitochondrial contact site complex (EMC) that has been implicated in lipid transport to mitochondria (Lahiri et al, 2014) and show that loss of SLC25A46 function produces alterations in mitochondrial phospholipid composition, providing insight into the molecular function of SLC25A46.

Results

A mutation in SLC25A46 is responsible for Leigh syndrome and impairs respiration

We investigated a girl born to first cousin French Canadian parents. Clinically, the subject presented with Leigh syndrome, an early‐onset and fatal neurodegenerative disease associated with bilaterally symmetric lesions in the brainstem, basal ganglia, and spinal cord (Leigh, 1951). Additional clinical details are reported in the Appendix.

Several candidate genes failed to reveal a causative mutation, so we used whole‐exome sequencing to search for a homozygous mutation. This analysis identified a homozygous missense mutation (c.425C > T) in SLC25A46, a gene coding for a member of the mitochondrial metabolite carrier family. Sanger sequencing of cDNA and gDNA isolated from subject fibroblasts confirmed the presence of the mutation (Fig 1A). The SLC25 family of mitochondrial metabolite carriers comprises more than 50 proteins in humans (Monne & Palmieri, 2014). Of the approximately half that have been functionally characterized, the majority transport specific metabolites across the inner mitochondrial membrane. The metabolite carrier proteins have a characteristic tripartite structure consisting of repeats of ~100 amino acids, each with two transmembrane alpha helices (Palmieri, 2014). The mature carrier protein thus consists of six transmembrane helices that form around an aqueous pore through which small metabolites are transported. Figure 1B shows a schematic representation of SLC25A46 and the mutation predicted to cause an amino acid substitution (p.Thr142Ile) between helix one and two. Phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial metabolite carrier proteins in human, yeast, and plants showed that SLC25A46 is most closely related to Ugo1, an outer membrane protein in yeast that is essential for mitochondrial membrane fusion (Sesaki & Jensen, 2001; Coonrod et al, 2007; Hoppins et al, 2009; Anton et al, 2011; Papic et al, 2011), suggesting that they are orthologous (Haferkamp & Schmitz‐Esser, 2012). Mitochondrial metabolite carriers have a highly conserved consensus sequence, PX(D,E)XX(K,R), at the C‐terminal end of the odd numbered transmembrane alpha helices in all three repeats, the charged residues forming salt bridges that close the pore on the matrix side (Monne et al, 2013). These sequences are not conserved in SLC25A46 (Fig EV1), suggesting that, while it is a member of this protein family, it does not likely have a conventional metabolite carrier function. The N‐terminus of SLC25A46 is also exceptionally long (~100 amino acids) compared to most other mitochondrial metabolite carriers (< 20 amino acids).

Figure 1. Loss of SLC25A46 function impairs respiration.

Figure 1

  1. DNA sequence analysis of SLC25A46 cDNA showing a homozygous c.425C > T mutation in the subject fibroblasts compared to the control.
  2. Schematic representation of SLC25A46 protein and position of the mutated p.Thr142Ile amino acid.
  3. BN‐PAGE analyses of OXPHOS mitochondrial complexes in fibroblasts from control and subject, overexpressing an HA‐tagged version of wild‐type SLC25A46. Each of the five OXPHOS complexes (I–V) was visualized with a subunit‐specific antibody that recognizes the native complex as follows: COI (NDUFA9), COII (SDHA), COIII (UQCRC1), COIV (COX4), COV (ATP5A1). Overexposure of the blot shows a defect in assembled complex IV (asterisk) and some free unassembled COX4 subunit in the subject (arrowhead). Complex II was used as a loading control.
  4. Immunoblot analysis of the same samples as in (C) for expression of SLC25A46 and individual structural subunits of the five OXPHOS complexes. The 70 kDa subunit of complex II (SDHA) was used as a loading control.
  5. Seahorse analysis of oxygen consumption rate in fibroblasts from control compared to subject fibroblasts with or without expression of an EGFP‐tagged version of wild‐type SLC25A46 (top panel) and in fibroblasts from control compared to those in which SLC25A46 is suppressed by a specific siRNA (bottom panel). n = 3, data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.
  6. Polarographic analysis of oxygen consumption in permeabilized fibroblasts from control and subject. Left panel: State 1: no exogenous substrates; state 2: addition of glutamate and malate (GM); state 3 (GM): addition of ADP; state 3 (Succ): addition of succinate; Oligo: inhibition of ATP synthase by oligomycin. Serial addition of 1–4 μM CCCP measuring maximal uncoupled respiration (control n = 4 vs. subject n = 5). Right panel: Complex IV‐driven O2 consumption was measured in the presence of antimycin A, TMPD and ascorbate (control n = 4 vs. subject n = 5). Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.

Source data are available online for this figure.

Figure EV1. Sequences of the putative functional carrier (PCD) domains in three typical mitochondrial metabolite carrier proteins, SLC25A46, MTCH1, and MTCH2.

Figure EV1

The consensus sequence is shown at the top of the figure. SLC25A1 is the citrate carrier, SLC25A4 is the adenine nucleotide translocase, and SLC25A7 is a proton carrier (uncoupling protein 1).

The p.Thr142Ile SLC25A46 variant was virtually undetectable in subject fibroblasts by immunoblot analysis (Fig 1D), suggesting that the missense mutation destabilizes the protein, perhaps by preventing its insertion into the membrane. BN‐PAGE analysis of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes consistently showed only a specific assembly defect in complex IV in subject fibroblasts (Fig 1C), which correlated with decreased steady‐state levels of two complex IV subunits, COX2 and COX4 (Fig 1D), a hallmark of such assembly defects (Zhu et al, 1998). Retroviral expression of the wild‐type HA‐tagged SLC25A46 cDNA completely rescued complex IV assembly (Fig 1C and D), confirming that it is the causative gene. To investigate whether the OXPHOS assembly defect resulted in a significant effect on overall cellular respiration, we measured the oxygen consumption rate in subject fibroblasts on a Seahorse apparatus (Fig 1E). This showed an approximately 50% decrease in basal oxygen consumption, with no measureable change in maximal oxygen consumption, which could be partially rescued by retroviral expression of SLC25A46‐GFP (Fig 1E, top panel). siRNA‐mediated suppression of SLC25A46 in control fibroblasts phenocopied the basal oxygen consumption defect in the subject cells (Fig 1E, bottom panel), confirming the specificity of the respiration defect. To further probe the cellular respiration phenotype, we carried out additional oxygen consumption measurements using a conventional Clark‐type electrode on digitonin‐permeabilized fibroblasts, in which it is possible to interrogate the activity of the components of the OXPHOS system in the presence of different substrates (Fig 1F). These results confirmed that basal oxygen consumption was reduced in the subject and that maximal uncoupled electron flow was no different in the subject vs. control (Fig 1F, left panel). Significantly, there was no difference in state 3 respiration with either malate/glutamate or succinate in the subject vs. control, demonstrating that this part of the respiratory chain is intact. Using TMPD/ascorbate to measure the maximum flux through complex IV, we observed a small decrease in the subject cells, consistent with the assembly defect, but which was, however, not statistically significant (Fig 1F, right panel).

SLC25A46 localizes to the outer mitochondrial membrane and loss of function causes mitochondrial hyperfusion

To confirm that SLC25A46 was an integral membrane protein, we assessed whether it could be extracted by alkaline carbonate (Fig 2A). As expected, SLC25A46 remained in the pellet fraction as did the control membrane protein MFN2. To determine whether the protein localized to the inner or outer membrane, we assessed the sensitivity of SLC25A46 to proteinase K digestion, using as control markers of all mitochondrial sub‐compartments (Fig 2B). SLC25A46 behaved like MFN2, strongly suggesting that it, like Ugo1 in yeast, localizes to the outer mitochondrial membrane. Similar results were reported in Abrams et al (2015). The only other members of the mammalian mitochondrial carrier family reported to localize to the mitochondrial outer membrane are MTCH1 (SLC25A49), a protein that interacts with presenilin (Lamarca et al, 2007), and MTCH2 (SLC25A50), which has been co‐opted by the apoptosis machinery, acting on the outer mitochondrial membrane as a receptor for tBid to recruit the pro‐apoptotic protein BAX of the Bcl‐2 family (Robinson et al, 2012). Neither MTCH1 or MTCH2 possess the conserved carrier domains typical of the SLC25 family (Fig EV1).

Figure 2. SLC25A46 controls mitochondrial dynamics.

Figure 2

  1. Alkaline carbonate extraction of mitochondria from control fibroblasts. Immunoblot analysis shows that SLC25A46 is an integral membrane protein. SDHA (soluble, membrane‐associated protein) and MFN2 (integral inner membrane protein) were used as controls.
  2. Proteinase K digestion assay on mitochondria from control fibroblasts. Mitochondria were exposed to an increasing concentration of proteinase K to determine the submitochondrial localization of SLC25A46. SLC25A46 behaves as an outer membrane protein. MFN2 was used as a control for outer membrane protein, AIFM1 for protein present in the inter‐membrane space, HCCS and SCO1 for inner membrane proteins, and MRPL14 for matrix protein.
  3. Immunoblot analysis of mitochondria from the same samples as in (D), for expression of SLC25A46 and known molecular components of the fusion/fission machinery. SDHA was used as a loading control.
  4. Immunofluorescence analysis of the mitochondrial network. Control and subject fibroblasts, overexpressing an EGFP‐tagged version of the wild‐type SLC25A46 protein (green) and control fibroblasts treated with an siRNA against SLC25A46, were stained with the mitochondrial marker TOMM20 (red) and the nuclear marker DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 10 μm.
  5. Quantification of the effect of SLC25A46 on the mitochondrial network shape. In each experimental condition described in (D), 150 cells were analyzed and the mitochondrial network organization was classified as intermediate, fused, or fragmented, in three independent experiments. Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test: control vs. patient, P = 1.10 × 10−4; control vs. siRNA SLC25A46, P = 1.16 × 10−4; subject vs. subject + SLC25A46‐GFP, P = 2.06 × 10−5.

Source data are available online for this figure.

Considering the evolutionary relationship with the yeast fusion regulator Ugo1, we examined mitochondrial morphology in subject and control fibroblasts following siRNA‐mediated suppression of SLC25A46 (Fig 2D). Fibroblasts from the subject, and from the siRNA‐treated control fibroblasts, showed a striking hyperfused phenotype (quantified in Fig 2E), opposite of what is found in yeast Ugo1 loss‐of‐function mutants (Coonrod et al, 2007; Hoppins et al, 2009). Expression of SLC25A46‐GFP rescued this phenotype in subject fibroblasts. The mitochondrial hyperfusion seems much more pronounced in fibroblasts than that reported in HeLa cells (Abrams et al, 2015), and interestingly, increased mitochondrial fission was reported in fibroblasts from the patient with optic atrophy spectrum disorder with a homozygous frameshifting mutation (Nguyen et al, 2016).

We next examined the effects of these manipulations on key components of the mitochondrial fission/fusion apparatus. Immunoblot analysis (Fig 2C) of the subject fibroblasts showed an accumulation of the profission protein DRP1 and the short OPA1 isoforms, which have been reported to trigger mitochondrial fragmentation (Anand et al, 2014). However no change was observed in the level of the fission factor MFF compared to controls. In subject fibroblasts, and in cells suppressed for SLC25A46, the level of MFN2 was insensitive to SLC25A46 loss or its overexpression. These results suggest that the hyperfusion phenotype cannot be explained by changes in profission or fusion factors.

DRP1 recruitment to the outer mitochondrial membrane at ER/mitochondrial contacts and its oligomerization are key steps in mitochondrial scission (Palmer et al, 2011). To investigate whether the striking hyperfused phenotype caused by lack of SLC25A46 was linked to a defect in DRP1 recruitment to mitochondria, we carried out a detailed analysis of DRP1 localization by immunofluorescence and subcellular fractionation, and in addition investigated its oligomerization state (Fig 3). Immunofluorescence analysis showed that DRP1 was recruited to mitochondria in subject cells (Fig 3A). The quantification of the overlapping signal between DRP1 and mitochondria (TOMM20) using Manders and Pearson coefficients (Fig 3B, top panel), as well as the calculation of the proportion of DRP1 present in mitochondria or cytosol (Fig 3B, bottom panel), demonstrated that DRP1 is only slightly less present at mitochondria in subject cells compared to control cells. On the other hand, the DRP1 content in the cytoplasm of subject cells was increased relative to controls. These results were entirely corroborated by subcellular fractionation and quantitative immunoblot analysis (Fig 3C), which showed a 1.85 increase in total cellular DRP1 and a small decrease in the ratio cytosolic/mitochondrial DRP1 (0.2–0.3) in the subject vs. control. Interestingly, even though there is a slight decrease in mitochondrial DRP1 recruitment in the subject, analysis of its oligomerization state through cross‐linking with BMH demonstrated an increase in DRP1 oligomers in subject vs. control cells (Fig 3D, *: monomer, arrowhead: dimer). The phosphorylation status of DRP1 on serines 616 or 637, which has been shown to be involved in mitochondrial dynamics, was also unaltered in subject cells compared to controls (Fig EV2). We conclude that an inability to recruit or oligomerize DRP1 at the mitochondrial membrane does not account for the mitochondrial hyperfusion phenotype in subject cells.

Figure 3. Role of SLC25A46 in mitochondrial DRP1 recruitment.

Figure 3

  1. Immunofluorescence analysis of DRP1 localization in control and subject fibroblasts. Mitochondria were visualized with TOMM20 (green) and endogenous DRP1 in red. Binary indicates thresholded binarized images and the hot map shows thresholded and binarized images from DRP1 and mitochondria combined to create an image of mitochondrial DRP1. The mitochondrial DRP1 created image was then merged with the mitochondrial image. False colors show the accumulation of DRP1 at mitochondria. Scale bars: 10 μm.
  2. Quantitation of the DRP1 localization by immunofluorescence analysis. Upper panel: Co‐localization of TOMM20 and DRP1 in control and subject fibroblasts was calculated by Mander's and Pearson's coefficients. Bottom panel: Quantification of DRP1 localization in the cytosol and the mitochondria. At least 15 cells per condition were analyzed in three independent experiments. Data represent mean ± SD and P‐values were calculated using a Student's t‐test.
  3. Analysis of DRP1 localization in control and subject fibroblasts by immunoblot analysis after cellular fractionation. ITPR1 was used as an ER marker, VDAC1 as a mitochondrial marker, and alpha‐tubulin as a cytosolic marker.
  4. Immunoblot analysis of mitochondrial DRP1 oligomers in control and subject fibroblasts, overexpressing an EGFP‐tagged version of wild‐type SLC25A46. Crude mitochondria were treated or not with the BMH cross‐linker. SDHA was used as a loading control. Monomers (asterisk), dimers (arrowhead), and oligomers of DRP1 are indicated.

Source data are available online for this figure.

Figure EV2. Role of SLC25A46 in mitochondrial recruitment of phosphorylated forms of DRP1.

Figure EV2

Immunoblot analysis of the localization of phosphorylated forms of DRP1 in control and subject fibroblasts after subcellular fractionation. Upper panel: DRP1 phosphorylated on serine 637. Bottom panel: DRP1 phosphorylated on serine 616. ITPR1 was used as an ER marker, VDAC1 as a mitochondrial marker, and alpha‐tubulin as a cytosolic marker.Source data are available online for this figure.

Loss of SLC25A46 results in loss of mitochondrial cristae and destabilization of the MICOS complex

We next performed transmission electron microscopy experiments to investigate changes in mitochondrial ultrastructure (Fig 4A). Mitochondria from the subject (Fig 4A, panels b and c) were very narrow and had either no visible cristae, or cristae that were markedly reduced in length compared to control (Fig 4A, panel a). Suppression of SLC25A46 phenocopied these abnormalities in mitochondrial architecture (Fig 4A, panels d and e). In addition, we observed a small number of mitochondria with parallel stacks of cristae in siRNA‐treated cells (Fig 4A, panel f). The changes in cristae architecture are quantified in Fig 4B. We did not observe the mitochondrial constriction sites reported in COS‐7 cells by Abrams et al (2015), which they interpreted as fission intermediates.

Figure 4. SLC25A46 is required for mitochondrial cristae formation and interacts with the EMC complex in the ER .

Figure 4

  1. Analysis of the mitochondrial ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy in control (a) and subject (b and c) fibroblasts and control fibroblasts treated with an siRNA against SLC25A46 (d–f).
  2. Quantification of the effect of SLC25A46 on the mitochondrial ultrastructure organization. In each experimental condition, 30 cells were analyzed for mitochondrial width, the number of cristae per μm of mitochondrial length, and the length of cristae. Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.
  3. Fibroblasts from control and subject, depleted of SLC25A46, were analyzed by immunoblot for expression of SLC25A46 and subunits of the MICOS complex. SDHA was used as a loading control.
  4. Control fibroblasts, non‐transfected or knocked down for MIC60 and MIC19, were analyzed by immunoblot for expression of SLC25A46, MIC60, and MIC19. SDHA was used as a loading control.
  5. Immunoblot analysis of the BioID assay with an N‐terminally FlagBirA*‐tagged SLC25A46 showing an interaction of SLC25A46 with EMC1, EMC2, and MFN2.

Source data are available online for this figure.

Disruption of the MICOS complex results in detachment of membrane junctions and parallel stacks of cristae (Harner et al, 2011; Hoppins et al, 2011; van der Laan et al, 2012), similar to the phenotype we observed in a small proportion of control cells treated with the SLC25A46 siRNA. To investigate whether the altered cristae architecture in subject and siRNA‐treated fibroblasts was the result of disruption of the MICOS complex, we evaluated the steady‐state levels of two key MICOS components, MIC60 (mitofilin) and MIC19 (CHCHD3), by immunoblot analysis (Fig 4C). Both proteins were substantially reduced in subject fibroblasts: MIC60 to 31% and MIC19 to 9% of control. The disruption of the MICOS complex was phenocopied in control fibroblasts treated with an siRNA directed against SLC25A46 (MIC60 34% and MIC19 to 21% of control) and was exacerbated in subject fibroblasts by further knockdown of the mutant SLC25A46 protein (MIC60 14% of control and MIC19 undetectable). To test whether loss of the MICOS components would affect the stability of SLC25A46, we depleted MIC60 and MIC19 using specific siRNAs. Depletion of MIC60 resulted in the complete disappearance of MIC19, and in cells treated with an siRNA against MIC19, only a very small amount of MIC60 was detectable, demonstrating their interdependence in the MICOS complex (Fig 4D). Immunoblot analysis showed no change in the level of SLC25A46 in MIC19 knockdown cells, but a substantial increase in cells in which both MIC60 and MIC19 were undetectable (Fig 4D). These results demonstrate that SLC25A46 is required for the stability of the MICOS complex. They further show that the level of SLC25A46 is very sensitive to the presence of MIC60. It is worth noting that previous studies demonstrated striking mitochondrial fission in HeLa cells depleted of MIC19 (Darshi et al, 2011; Ott et al, 2015), and it was concluded that mitochondria lacking MIC19 are fusion incompetent (Darshi et al, 2011). Our results show that this phenotype is completely suppressed by the loss of SLC25A46 function.

SLC25A46 interacts with components of the mitochondrial fusion machinery and the MICOS complex

Given the established links between Ugo1 and mitochondrial fusion, combined with the above results suggesting functional interactions between SLC25A46 and the MICOS complex, we decided to test for physical interactions by immunoprecipitation experiments after chemical cross‐linking (Table 1). All of these experiments were carried out using antibodies directed against the endogenous proteins, avoiding overexpression artifacts. SLC25A46 co‐immunoprecipitated with OPA1, the profusion outer membrane proteins MFN1 and MFN2, analogous to what is found with Ugo1, SAMM50, and two components of the MICOS complex (MIC60, MIC19). OPA1 co‐immunoprecipitated the same subset of mitochondrial proteins, and, in addition, other members of the MICOS complex, and several subunits of the TIM and TOM complexes (Table 1). Finally, immunoprecipitation of MIC60 brought down OPA1, the MICOS complex, and several subunits of the TIM and TOM complexes. These results strongly suggest that SLC25A46 is part of a larger interactome that integrates the major cristae organizing proteins with proteins of the outer mitochondrial membrane, consistent with a role in cristae maintenance.

Table 1.

SLC25A46 interacts with mitochondrial fusion machinery, SAMM50 and the MICOS complex

Immunoprecipitated proteins (Mascot score of positive sample/control sample)
Co‐immunoprecipitated proteins SLC25A46 OPA1 MFN2 MIC60 (IMMT)
Fission/fusion
SLC25A46 363 281 50
OPA1 866 4,877 137 2,061
MFN2 109 146 1,197
MFN1 70 301 208 155
MFF 246 115
FIS1 48
MTFR1L 143 166
MICOS complex
MIC60 (IMMT) 184 2,605/182 3,638/106
MIC19 (CHCHD3) 142 866/107 1,276/85
MIC25 (CHCHD6) 287 561
MIC10 (MINOS1) 45
MIC27 (APOOL) 111 300
APOO 64 343
DNAJC11 589 1,175
SAM
SAMM50 88 980 1,777
Porins
VDAC1 309 1,412/164 112 1,061/68
VDAC2 131 1,027/259 137 821/128
VDAC3 53 864 68 385
Translocation complex
TIMM8A 127 142
TIMM9 217
TIMM10 76 126
TIMM13 156 148
TIMM17B 54 121
TIMM23 119 111
TIMM50 587/22 453
TOMM7 50
TOMM20 97
TOMM40 517 562
TOMM70A 67 198 377

Protein interactions were analyzed by co‐immunoprecipitation after chemical cross‐ linking. SLC25A46, OPA1, MFN2, and MIC60 were immunoprecipitated with antibodies against the endogenous proteins and the co‐immunoprecipitating proteins were identified by mass spectrometry. Mascot scores are shown (positive/control samples).

SLC25A46 interacts with components of the EMC complex, involved in lipid transfer from the ER to the mitochondria

The protein–protein interactions observed in the above experiments result from short‐range molecular interactions that can be captured by chemical cross‐linking. To further examine the interactome of SLC25A46, we used a complementary assay called BioID, or proximity‐based biotinylation, a method enabling the detection of protein–protein interactions in living cells (Roux et al, 2012). SLC25A46 was N‐terminally tagged with the promiscuous biotin‐conjugating enzyme (BirA*) and expressed in the presence of biotin in HEK293 cells. This resulted in biotinylation of SLC25A46 neighboring proteins, which were then captured on streptavidin beads, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. This exploratory screen confirmed the interaction of SLC25A46 with the mitochondrial proteins reported above and, in addition, revealed an interaction with all of the components of an ER protein complex, the EMC (EMC1‐9) (Appendix Table S1). The EMC was initially identified in a screen for proteins involved in protein folding in the ER (Jonikas et al, 2009) and was recently shown to be necessary for phospholipid transfer from the ER to mitochondria in yeast (Lahiri et al, 2014). Immunoblot analysis of the streptavidin–agarose pull‐down from the BirA*‐FLAG‐SLC25A46 cells treated with biotin confirmed the interaction with EMC1 and EMC2, as well as the outer membrane protein MFN2 (Fig 4E). These data suggest that SCL25A46 may couple the lipid transport machinery from the ER to the regulators of mitochondrial architecture.

Loss of SLC25A46 alters mitochondrial phospholipid composition and endoplasmic reticulum morphology

Phospholipid synthesis occurs largely in the ER, and mitochondrial membrane biogenesis and lipid metabolism require phospholipid transfer from the ER at regions of close contact between these organelles (Tamura et al, 2014). In addition to the acquisition of lipids for mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial decarboxylase enzymes are essential for the conversion of phosphatidylserine (PS) to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), which is returned to the ER for conversion to phosphatidylcholine (PC).

To test whether the altered mitochondrial network and mitochondrial architecture might result from a defect in mitochondrial lipid transfer and content, we carried out a targeted analysis of several glycerophospholipids in gradient‐purified mitochondria from control and subject cells using mass spectrometry. Overall we were able to identify and quantify 71 lipid species (49 phosphatidylcholines (PC), 14 phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), five phosphatidylserines (PS), and three phosphatidic acids (PA) as shown in the volcano plot (Fig 5, Appendix Table S2). It is clear from the plot that most species of PE, PA, and PS are decreased in subject mitochondria. Interestingly, while PCs as a class did not show any specific pattern, all identified PC plasmalogens were increased in subject mitochondria.

Figure 5. Loss of SLC25A46 leads to alterations in mitochondrial lipid content.

Figure 5

Volcano plot representing the mass spectrometry signals from 71 glycerophospholipids, namely 49 PC (phosphatidylcholine) (39 non‐plasmalogens and 10 plasmalogens), 14 PE (phosphatidylethanolamine), five PS (phosphatidylserine), and three PA (phosphatidic acid), which are shown as different color symbols as indicated, analyzed in gradient‐purified mitochondrial extracts from subject vs. control cells. All lipid entities shown above the horizontal red line have a P‐value < 0.05.

Since PE from mitochondria is required to synthesize PC in the ER, we decided to investigate the potential consequences on ER morphology in subject cells. To test this, we examined ER morphology by immunofluorescence analyses (Fig 6). Using the anti‐KDEL antibody, we observed a markedly abnormal ER morphology in subject cells, and in particular a loss of the tubular morphology in the periphery of the cell, and a more sheet‐like structure overall (Fig 6A). We classified and quantified these phenotypes and showed an almost complete separation between subject and control cells (Fig 6B and C). While mitochondrial contacts were relatively easy to visualize in control cells, the sheet‐like structure of the ER in subject cells obscured direct and unequivocal observation of such contacts (Fig 6D).

Figure 6. Loss of SLC25A46 alters endoplasmic reticulum morphology.

Figure 6

  1. Immunofluorescence analysis of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) network in control and subject fibroblasts. The ER was stained in red (KDEL), mitochondria in green (TOMM20). Scale bars: 20 μm.
  2. The organization of the reticular ER network was classified as class I (normal), class II (mildly disorganized), or class III (highly disorganized). Scale bars: 10 μm.
  3. Quantification of the control and subject ER network organization. In each condition, 30 cells were analyzed in three independent experiments. Data represent mean ± SD and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.
  4. Immunofluorescence analysis of contacts sites between ER and mitochondria in control and subject fibroblasts. ER was stained in red (KDEL), mitochondria in green (TOMM20). Contact sites are shown by arrowheads. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Loss of SLC25A46 results in premature cellular senescence

Although we immortalized the subject cells with retroviral vectors expressing hTERT and the E7 gene from HPV‐16 (Lochmuller et al, 1999), we observed that their doubling rate was much reduced compared to controls (Fig 7A), or other fibroblast lines with OXPHOS assembly defects. This prompted us to measure markers associated with cellular senescence. The surface area of subject fibroblasts was twice that of controls (Fig 7B), and there was a fivefold increase in the proportion of cells expressing senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase activity (Fig 7C and D). Using a cell migration assay, we also observed a marked decrease in cell migration (Fig 7F and G). At the molecular level, this was associated with an upregulation of p21 and altered processing of p53, concomitant with a downregulation of its regulator the E3 ubiquitin ligase P‐Mdm2, all of which are associated with cell cycle arrest and senescence. Other molecular markers of senescence were also observed to increase, such as LAMP1, a lysosomal marker and the short forms of the intermediate filament protein vimentin. Retroviral expression of wild‐type SLC25A46‐GFP rescued these senescence and cell cycle phenotypes, with the exception of p21, which was only partially rescued (Fig 7E). We tested a several other cell lines for the senescence phenotype and observed that suppression of SLC25A46 suppressed the growth phenotype in all. Two examples are shown: a control primary fibroblast line (Fig 7H and I) and MCF7, a metastatic breast cancer line (Fig 7J and K).

Figure 7. Loss of SLC25A46 promotes premature senescence and impairs cell migration.

Figure 7

  1. Analysis of the cell growth rate of control and subject fibroblasts, overexpressing or not an EGFP‐tagged version of the wild‐type SLC25A46. Experiments were done in independent triplicates. Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.
  2. Analysis of the cell area in control and subject fibroblasts, overexpressing or not an EGFP‐tagged version of the wild‐type SLC25A46. 30 cells were measured in each condition and experiments were repeated three times. Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.
  3. Analysis of the senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase (SA‐β‐gal) activity in control and subject fibroblasts, overexpressing or not an EGFP‐tagged version of the wild‐type SLC25A46. Hydrolysis of X‐gal results in the accumulation of a distinctive blue color in senescent cells.
  4. Quantification of the senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase (SA‐β‐gal) activity in each of the experimental conditions described in (C). In each condition, 200 cells were analyzed. Percentage of positive blue cells corresponding to senescent cells was calculated. Experiments were done in independent triplicates. Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.
  5. Immunoblot analysis from the same samples as in (A), for expression of SLC25A46, regulators of the cell cycle, and markers of senescence. SDHA was used as a loading control.
  6. Analysis of cell migration capacity of control and subject fibroblasts, overexpressing or not an EGFP‐tagged version of the wild‐type SLC25A46, using a transwell assay as described in Materials and Methods. Cells that migrated through the membrane were identified under a microscope using DAPI staining. Scale Bars: 50 μm.
  7. Quantification of cell migration capacity in each of the experimental conditions described in (F). In each condition, all cells present in a field were counted and five random fields were analyzed per condition. Experiments were done in independent triplicates. Data represent mean ± SD and P‐values were calculated using a Student's t‐test.
  8. Analysis of the cell growth rate of primary control fibroblasts treated or not with an siRNA against SLC25A46 for 3 and 6 days. Experiments were done in independent triplicates. Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.
  9. Immunoblot analysis from the same samples as in (H), for expression of SLC25A46, regulators of the cell cycle, and markers of senescence. SDHA was used as a loading control.
  10. Analysis of the cell growth rate of MCF7 breast cancer cells treated or not with an siRNA against SLC25A46 for 3 and 6 days. Experiments were done in independent triplicates. Data represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.
  11. Immunoblot analysis from the same samples as in (J). SDHA was used as a loading control.

Source data are available online for this figure.

Discussion

This study identifies SLC25A46 as a key player in human mitochondrial architecture, and, when mutated, as a cause of classical Leigh syndrome, an early‐onset neurodegenerative disease. A recent study identified mutations in SLC25A46 in four families with optic atrophy, axonal CMT, and cerebellar atrophy (Abrams et al, 2015), and an additional patient was recently reported with an optic atrophy spectrum disorder (Nguyen et al, 2016), indicating that the neurological phenotypes produced by mutations in this gene are clinically heterogeneous. All reported cases of classical Leigh syndrome result from mutations in structural subunits of pyruvate dehydrogenase, structural subunits of the OXPHOS complexes, or in factors necessary for the assembly of the OXPHOS complexes. At least 75 different genes in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA genes have been shown to be causal (Ruhoy & Saneto, 2014; Lake et al, 2016), but to our knowledge this is the first report of a mutation in a protein influencing mitochondrial morphology that is associated with Leigh syndrome. Mutations in the fusion genes OPA1 and MFN2 have been associated with dominant optic atrophy (Alexander et al, 2000; Delettre et al, 2000) and CMT Type 2A (Zuchner et al, 2004), respectively, but the reasons for these genotype–phenotype correlations have remained an enduring mystery. Despite the striking abnormalities in mitochondrial architecture, the OXPHOS defect in the subject we studied, a specific decrease that resulted in complex IV assembly, was relatively mild. This, however, resulted in about a 50% decrease in basal cellular oxygen consumption, suggesting that coupled electron flow through the respiratory chain was additionally compromised. Our investigations on permeabilized fibroblasts, supplied with exogenous substrates, demonstrated that coupled electron flow was no different in the subject vs. control and that the maximum capacity of the respiratory chain (uncoupled electron flow) was unchanged in subject cells, indicating that substrate supply underlies the basal respiration deficit.

Both Ugo1 and SLC25A46 localize to the outer mitochondrial membrane and both physically interact with OPA1 (Mgm1 in yeast) and MFN2 (Fzo in yeast) [this study and Sesaki and Jensen (2004)]. Thus, both are poised to integrate the functions of the outer and inner mitochondrial fusion apparatus as has been proposed for Ugo1 (Hoppins et al, 2009). SLC25A46 also interacts with components of the MICOS complex, in particular the core components MIC60 and MIC19 (Table 1), and Ugo1 was reported to co‐isolate with the components of the yeast MICOS complex (Harner et al, 2011). Despite these similarities, the loss of SLC25A46 results in a hyperfused mitochondrial phenotype in human cells, whereas loss of Ugo1 function results in mitochondrial fission (Sesaki & Jensen, 2001, 2004; Hoppins et al, 2009).

While the exact molecular function of Ugo1 remains unknown, it is clear that in addition to its role in mitochondrial fusion, it is also important for normal mitochondrial architecture, as the number of cristae and mitochondrial contact sites (sites where the inner and outer membranes are closely apposed) is very dramatically reduced in Ugo1 deletion strains (Harner et al, 2011). We observed similar alterations in mitochondrial cristae architecture in subject fibroblasts and in cells depleted of SLC25A46. This failure to form normal cristae was associated with the cleavage of OPA1 to the short forms, and a marked decrease in the steady‐state levels of MIC60, and the almost complete disappearance of MIC19. This suggests that the interaction with SLC25A46 is an important determinant of the stability of the MICOS complex. On the other hand, depletion of MIC19 had no effect on SLC25A46, while depletion of MIC60 resulted in a substantial increase in the steady‐state level of SLC25A46, perhaps as an attempt to compensate for the loss of the MICOS complex, and in particular MIC60. Similar studies evaluating the effect of Ugo1 deletion on the MICOS components in yeast have not been reported, but would be of great interest. Studies implicating both OPA1 and the MICOS complex in the maintenance of cristae architecture are compelling, but how these machineries interact is unclear. The observation that SLC25A46 interacts with OPA1 and MIC60, the major MICOS organizer, provides a molecular link to integrate their function in modulating cristae architecture.

The marked alterations in mitochondrial morphology resulting from the loss of SLC25A46 are rather unexpected due to the clear role for yeast Ugo1 in facilitating fusion, although striking and similar abnormalities in cristae architecture from loss of function are common to both. Indeed, we observe an increase in OPA1 cleavage, which has also been shown to promote mitochondrial fragmentation in dysfunctional mitochondria (Anand et al, 2014). We also show that the overall cellular content of DRP1 is increased, with efficient recruitment and oligomerization on mitochondria, in contrast to situations where the mitochondrial DRP1 receptors have been deleted (Osellame et al, 2016; Otera et al, 2016); however, it does not drive productive mitochondrial fission events. All of this might be explained if the primary function of SLC25A46 were to facilitate lipid flux at ER contact sites, rather than to coordinate fission per se. The decreased PS and PE content we observed in subject mitochondria is highly reminiscent of the changes observed in the mitochondrial phospholipid composition after deletion of five of the components of the EMC complex in yeast (Lahiri et al, 2014), which also results in a vegetative growth defect. Particularly striking in our results is the consistent increase in the PC plasmalogen content of subject mitochondria, the significance of which will require further investigation. Although the full function of the EMC complex is yet to be elucidated, it is interesting to note that mutations in EMC1 have recently been described in patients with a complex neurological syndrome that includes cerebellar atrophy (Harel et al, 2016).

The mitochondrial hyperfusion phenotype caused by the loss of SLC25A46 function culminates in premature cellular senescence. Fibroblasts from patients with OXPHOS deficiencies per se do not become senescent. While the deletion of Ugo1 results in an inability to grow on non‐fermentable substrates, likely due to the loss of mtDNA (Sesaki & Jensen, 2004), cells can grow in rich glucose medium (Harner et al, 2011), although vegetative growth rate is reduced (Stevenson et al, 2001). Cellular senescence has also been described in mammalian cells depleted of DRP1 (Park et al, 2010) or FIS1 (Lee et al, 2007), both components of the mammalian mitochondrial fission machinery. Whether this reflects an inability to properly segregate mitochondria to the daughter cells during mitosis, or perhaps a role for mitochondrial dynamics in regulating senescence through signaling pathways, is not yet clear. Indeed, there are several reports of direct links between the GTPases that regulate morphology and signaling pathways including Notch (Kasahara et al, 2013), antiviral signaling (Castanier et al, 2010), and Ras (Chen et al, 2004).

It is reasonable to conclude that the hyperfused phenotype and lack of cristae in the subject cells are caused by a defect in lipid transfer between the ER and mitochondria. It has been established that mitochondrial fission occurs at sites of ER contact (Friedman et al, 2011); however, the molecular contributions of the ER in driving scission remain unclear. In cells lacking SLC25A46, changes in the lipid composition of the ER could inhibit membrane tubulation, which is critical to “wrap” the mitochondria at sites of division. Overall, our data are consistent with a model whereby lipid transfer from the ER may facilitate changes in mitochondrial curvature during division. In the absence of this, mitochondria remain hyperfused, even when OPA1 is in the short, fusion‐incompetent form. Thus, our newly identified links between MFN2, OPA1, MICOS, and EMC indicate that SLC25A46 mechanistically couples lipid flux between the ER and mitochondria directly at outer/inner mitochondrial membrane contacts. This interactome also appears necessary to provide the flow of lipids essential for cristae growth and maintenance. Future experiments will better define the dynamic coordination between the complexes and functions that link to SLC25A46.

Materials and Methods

Human studies

The research studies on cell lines were approved by the institutional review board of the Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University.

Whole‐exome and Sanger sequencing analysis

Whole‐exome library preparation, capturing, and sequencing were performed at the high‐throughput sequencing platform of the McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Canada, as detailed in our previous publications (Fahiminiya et al, 2013, 2015; Hinttala et al, 2015). Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from patient fibroblasts. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina Hiseq 2000 sequencer after the capturing of coding regions with the TruSeq Exome Enrichment Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Using BWA (version 0.5.9) (Li et al, 2009), sequencing reads (100 bp paired end) were aligned to the human reference genome (UCSC hg19). Local realignment around small insertions or deletions (indels) and computation of depth of coverage were performed by Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK, version 1.0.5) (McKenna et al, 2010). The average coverage of consensus coding sequence (CCDS) was 52X and 93% of bases were covered by ≥ 5 reads. Samtools (v. 0.1.17) (Li et al, 2009) mpileup and bcftools were used to call single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels. All called variants were subsequently annotated with in‐house annotation pipeline that uses ANNOVAR and some custom scripts. The damaging effect of detected variants was predicted using three in silico prediction tools [SIFT (Kumar et al, 2009), PolyPhen‐2 (Adzhubei et al, 2010), and MutationTaster (Schwarz et al, 2010)].

To identify genetic cause of the disease, we focused on exonic and canonical splice site variants with possible protein altering effects (nonsense, frameshift indel, splicing, and missense). We only considered variants that (i) covered by at least five reads, (ii) had a quality score higher than 20, and (iii) had an allele frequency < 5% in public databases (the 1,000 Genomes or in the Exome Variant Server, EVS) and seen in less than 20 individuals in our in‐house exome database (contains ~1,000 previously sequenced samples) and not occurred as homozygotes in the ExAC database. Finally, the remaining variants were annotated with known and predicted mitochondrial proteins by using the MitoCarta database and were considered for further investigation.

Sanger sequencing of the SLC25A46 gene in cDNA and gDNA from the subject was used to confirm the exome sequencing results. Total RNA was isolated from fibroblasts using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON. Canada) and the cDNA was amplified with specific primers using the one‐step reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) kit (Qiagen). Total genomic DNA was extracted from fibroblasts using the DNAeasy kit (Qiagen) and primers specific for exon 4 of SLC25A46 were used to amplify the gDNA.

Cell lines

Control and subject fibroblasts were immortalized as described previously (Lochmuller et al, 1999). MCF7 breast cancer cells and fibroblasts were grown in high‐glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells stably overexpressing the HA‐tagged or EGFP‐tagged version of SLC25A46 were engineered using retroviral vectors as previously described (Weraarpachai et al, 2009).

siRNA transfection

Stealth RNAi duplex constructs (Invitrogen) were used for transient knockdown of SLC25A46 in control and subject fibroblasts or MCF7 cells. Stealth siRNA duplexes were transiently transfected into cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's specifications. The transfection was repeated on day 3 and the cells were harvested on day 6 for analysis.

Mitochondrial isolation

Fibroblasts were rinsed twice, resuspended in ice‐cold 250 mM sucrose/10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), and homogenized with ten passes of a pre‐chilled, zero‐clearance homogenizer (Kimble/Kontes). A post‐nuclear supernatant was obtained by centrifugation of the samples twice for 10 min at 600 × g. Mitochondria were pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 × g and washed once in the same buffer. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay.

Cell fractionation

Fibroblasts were rinsed twice in PBS, resuspended in ice‐cold 250 mM sucrose/10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4). 10% were pelleted and lysed in 1.5% DDM in PBS. The lysate was centrifuged for 15 min at 20,000 × g, and the supernatant was considered as the total fraction. The rest of the cells were homogenized in ice‐cold 250 mM sucrose/10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4) with ten passes of a pre‐chilled, zero‐clearance homogenizer (Kimble/Kontes). A post‐nuclear supernatant was obtained by centrifugation of the samples five times for 10 min at 600 × g. Mitochondria were pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 × g, washed twice in the same buffer, and lysed in 1.5% DDM in PBS. The lysate was considered as a crude mitochondrial fraction. The remaining supernatant, after the mitochondria fractionation step, was cleared by three further rounds of centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. This supernatant was then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h. The pellet was washed two times with PBS, lysed in 1.5% DDM in PBS, and considered as light membranes. The supernatant was adjusted at 1.5% DDM and considered as the cytosol fraction. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay.

BMH cross‐linking

Cross‐linking experiments were performed as previously described (Prudent et al, 2015). Briefly, mitochondria were prepared in HIM buffer (200 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES [pH 7.5]) at 1 μg/μl. Half of the sample was kept without cross‐linking, and the other half was treated with BMH (bis‐maleimido‐hexane) at 10 mM for 45 min at RT with rotation. The reaction was stopped by addition of DTT at 50 mM final for 15 min at RT with rotation. Mitochondria were then pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min and rinsed twice with HIM buffer.

Denaturating and native PAGE

For SDS–PAGE, cells were extracted with 1.5% DDM/PBS, after which 20 μg of protein was run on polyacrylamide gels. BN‐PAGE was used to separate individual OXPHOS complexes. Isolated mitochondria were solubilized with 1% DDM, and 20 μg of solubilized samples were run in the first dimension on 6–15% polyacrylamide gradient gels as previously described (Leary, 2012). The separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblot analysis was performed with the indicated antibodies.

Oxygen consumption measurement

SeaHorse

Cells were seeded overnight in 24‐well culture plate at 2 × 105 cells/well. Culture media were removed the following day and replaced with XF Assay Media from SeaHorse Bioscience (Billerica, MA) containing 4.5 g/l glucose and incubated at 37°C. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured using the SeaHorse XF24 Extracellular Analyzer over a 65‐min time period. The assay consisted of two basal rate measurements followed by sequential injections of oligomycin (1.5 μM), FCCP (2 μM), and rotenone (0.1 μM) + antimycin (1.0 μM). Two rate measurements were performed after each injection. Experiments were done three times independently. Errors bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.

Clark‐type electrodes

Respiration was measured polarographically using Clark‐type electrodes (Hansatech Instruments, Norfolk, UK) (Burelle et al, 2015). Approximately 4 × 106 fibroblasts cells were permeabilized with digitonin (100 μg/ml) for 1 min at 37°C. Cells were then spun and resuspended in 1 ml of a respirometry buffer (300 mM Mannitol, 5 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 2 mg/ml BSA in 10 mM phosphate buffer; pH 7.55) (Rustin et al, 1994). Baseline respiration was recorded in the absence of respiratory substrates at 37°C followed by sequential addition of substrates: glutamate (5 mM) + malate (2.5 mM); ADP (2 mM); succinate (5 mM); oligomycin A (1 μM); CCCP (1 μM × 4 times) (control n = 4; subject n = 5). Complex IV‐driven O2 consumption was independently measured with the following sequence: antimycin A (4 μM); CCCP (3 μM); ascorbate (2 mM); TMPD/ascorbate (5 mM/20 mM); KCN (80 μM). Complex IV‐driven O2 consumption was defined as (VO2 TMPD/ascorbate – VO2 KCN) in order to correct for TMPD auto‐oxidation (control n = 7; subject n = 5). Each measurement was normalized over protein content using the Bio‐Rad DC protein assay kit, and results are expressed in nmole O2/min/mg of protein. Error bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.

Localization assays

To determine the membrane topology of SLC25A46, mitochondria were extracted with 100 mM alkaline carbonate at pH 11.5 as previously described (Weraarpachai et al, 2009) and the relevant fractions were analyzed by SDS–PAGE. To determine the localization of SLC25A46 at the membrane, 60 μg of freshly prepared crude mitochondria was put in the presence of an increasing concentration of proteinase K diluted in the isolation buffer, for 20 min on ice. The reaction was stopped by adding PMSF (2 mM final) and the cells left on ice for 20 min. Mitochondria were then pelleted at 10,000 × g for 10 min, put in Laemmli buffer, and analyzed by SDS–PAGE.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence analyses were performed as previously described (Prudent et al, 2015). Briefly, cells were fixed in 5% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS at 37°C for 15 min, then washed three times with PBS, followed by quenching with 50 mM ammonium chloride in PBS. After three washes in PBS, cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X‐100 in PBS, followed by three washes in PBS. The cells were then blocked with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in PBS, followed by incubation with primary antibodies in 5% FBS in PBS, for 1 h at RT. After three washes with 5% FBS in PBS, cells were incubated with the appropriate anti‐species secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa fluorochromes (Invitrogen) (1:1,000) for 1 h at RT. After three washes in PBS, coverslips were mounted onto slides using fluorescence mounting medium (Dako).

Confocal imaging

Stained cells were imaged using a 60× or a 100× objective lenses (NA1.4) on an Olympus IX81 inverted microscope with appropriate lasers using an Andor/Yokogawa spinning disk system (CSU‐X), with a sCMOS camera.

Mitochondrial network morphology (Fig 2) was classified in a blinded manner as fused, intermediate, or fragmented. For each condition, 150 cells were analyzed. Experiments were done three times independently. Errors bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.

To analyze mitochondrial DRP1 recruitment (Fig 3), a 0.2 μm z‐axis image series of cells labeled for TOMM20 and DRP1 was obtained and stacked using the same conditions of gain, laser intensities, and exposure time. Images were then compiled as “max projection” and manually thresholded at the same level using control cells referenced with the FIJI software. Of note, due to the mitochondrial thinness and decreased fluorescence intensity, it was necessary to threshold mitochondria from subject samples manually for co‐localization calculations. Mander's and Pearson's coefficients were determined between images in the two channels using the “coloc2” plug‐in from FIJI.

Determination of the partitioning of DRP1 between the cytosol and mitochondria was analyzed as described previously (Palmer et al, 2013). Briefly, thresholded images were binarized, and total DRP1 fluorescence was measured. The binarized image from mitochondria was then subtracted from the total DRP1 signal, using the “Image calculator” plug‐in from FIJI, resulting in a cytosolic DRP1 image. The fluorescence intensity of cytosolic DRP1 was then measured and subtracted from the total DRP1 fluorescence intensity to calculate the mitochondrial DRP1 signal. To create mitochondrial DRP1 “hot map”, thresholded and binarized images from DRP1 and mitochondria were combined to create a mitochondrial DRP1 image using the “image calculator” plug‐in from FIJI. This mitochondrial DRP1 created image was then merged with the mitochondrial image, and false color image showing the DRP1 accumulation at mitochondria was created. At least 15 cells per condition were analyzed for three independent experiments. Errors bars represent mean ± SD and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.

For ER morphology (Fig 6), three stacks of 0.2 μm were acquired for cells stained with anti‐TOMM20 and anti‐KDEL antibodies using the 60× objective. Images were then compiled by “max projection” using the FIJI software and quantified in class I, II, or III. At least 30 cells per condition were analyzed in three independent experiments. Error bars represent mean ± SD and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.

Analysis of the mitochondrial ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy

Cells were washed in 0.1 M Na cacodylate washing buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.1 M Na cacodylate buffer overnight at 4°C. Cells were then washed three times in 0.1 M Na cacodylate washing buffer for a total of 1 h, incubated in 1% osmium tetroxide (Mecalab) for 1 h at 4°C, and washed with ddH2O three times for 10 min. Then, dehydration in a graded series of ethanol/deionized water solutions from 30 to 90% for 8 min each, and 100% twice for 10 min each, was performed. The cells were then infiltrated with a 1:1 and 3:1 Epon 812 (Mecalab):ethanol mixture, each for 30 min, followed by 100% Epon 812 for 1 h. Cells were embedded in the culture wells with new 100% Epon 812 and polymerized overnight in an oven at 60°C. Polymerized blocks were trimmed and 100 nm ultrathin sections were cut with an Ultracut E ultramicrotome (Reichert Jung) and transferred onto 200‐mesh Cu grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Sections were post‐stained for 8 min with 4% aqueous uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and 5 min with Reynold's lead citrate (Fisher Scientific). Samples were imaged with a FEI Tecnai‐12 transmission electron microscope (FEI Company) operating at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV equipped with an XR‐80C AMT, 8 megapixel CCD camera. Based on those images, mitochondrial ultra structural characteristics (width, cristae/μm of mitochondria, length of cristae) were measured using ImageJ software. For each condition, 30 cells were analyzed. Error bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.

Immunoprecipitation

Before extraction, mitochondria (200 μg) isolated from control fibroblasts were chemically cross‐linked with 1 mM disuccinimidyl glutarate (DSG) (Sigma) in isolation buffer, for 2 h on ice. The reaction was stopped by adding glycine pH 8.0 at 70 mM final for 10 min on ice. Mitochondria were pelleted, rinsed once, and extracted in 200 μl of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% n‐dodecyl‐D‐maltoside (DDM) (Sigma), and complete protease inhibitors (Roche)) on ice for 30 min. The extract was centrifuged at 20,000 × g at 4°C for 20 min, and the supernatant was pre‐cleared overnight with non‐coated Dynabeads Protein A (Invitrogen) to reduce non‐specific protein binding to the beads. Binding of indicated antibodies to Dynabeads Protein A (Invitrogen) was performed overnight. Antibodies were then cross‐linked to the beads using 20 mM dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP) (Sigma). The immunoprecipitation reaction was performed overnight at 4°C. Samples were eluted using 0.1 M glycine pH 2.5/0.5% DDM, trichloroacetic acid precipitated, and analyzed by mass spectrometry on an Orbitrap (Thermo Scientific) at the Institute de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal. The false discovery rate is < 5% with a Mascot score of 50.

BioID

SLC25A46 was N‐terminally tagged with BirA*‐FLAG and integrated stably in HEK293 Flp‐In T‐REx (Invitrogen) cells for tetracycline inducible expression. Induction of expression, in vivo cellulose biotinylation and purification of biotinylated proteins followed by their identification by mass spectrometry, was performed as described previously, and data were compared to negative controls expressing the BirA* tag alone, the BirA* tag fused to GFP, and untransfected cells (Couzens et al, 2013). To validate the interaction of SLC25A46 with the EMC subunits, eluates from induced and non‐induced cells were analyzed by immunoblot and the biotinylated partners were revealed with specific antibodies against EMC1, EMC2, MFN2, and FlagM2.

Antibodies

Antibodies directed against the following were used in this study: SLC25A46 (Proteintech, 12277‐1‐AP), MFN2 (Santa Cruz, sc‐100560), SDHA (Abcam, ab14715), AIFM1 (Chemicon, MABN92), ATP5A1 (Abcam, ab14748), HCCS (Proteintech, 15118‐1‐AP), SCO1 (in‐house), MRPL14 (Proteintech, 15040‐1‐AP), NDUFA9 (Abcam, ab14713), UQCRC2 (Abcam, ab14745), COX4 (in‐house), COX2 (in‐house), MFN1 (Cell Signaling, 14739), IMMT/MIC60 (Abnova, H00010989‐M01), CHCHD3/MIC19 (Aviva, ARP57040‐P050), OPA1 (BD biosciences, 612607), MFF (Sigma, SAB1305258), CDKN1A/p21 (Cell Signaling, 2946), p53 (Abcam, ab176243), p‐Mdm2 (Cell Signaling, 3521), LAMP1 (Santa Cruz, sc‐18821), VIM (BD biosciences, 550513), VDAC1 (Abcam, ab14734), EMC1 (GeneTex, GTX119884), EMC2 (ProteinTech, 25443‐1‐AP) and FlagM2 (Sigma, F1804), TOMM20 (Santa Cruz, sc‐11415), DRP1 (BD biosciences, 611113), p637‐DRP1 (Cell Signaling, 6319), p616‐DRP1 (Cell Signaling, 3455), KDEL (Abcam, ab50601), ITPR1 (Cell Signaling, 8568), alpha‐tubulin (Santa Cruz, sc‐23948).

Cell growth assay

For immortalized fibroblasts, 10,000 cells were seeded in a six well culture dishes at day 0. After 1, 2, 3, and 4 days of culture, cells were trypsinized, homogenized, and counted using a Bio‐Rad TC10 automated cell counter. Experiments were done in independent triplicates. Errors bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.

For primary fibroblasts and MCF7 cells, 200,000 and 300,000 cells, respectively, were seeded in two 60‐mm culture dishes at day 0 and submitted to siRNA. After 3 days of culture, a dish was counted, the second transfected for three more days. Experiments were done three times independently. Errors bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using t‐test.

Cellular area measurement

Cells were seeded on coverglass, fixed, and mounted on a slide for observation. Images were captured using a Zeiss observer Z1 inverted microscope, using a 40× Apochromat objective (Zeiss) and an ORCA‐ER cooled CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics). Axiovision software (Zeiss) was used to acquire images and measure the cell surface. For each condition, 30 cells were measured, and the experiments were repeated three times. Errors bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.

Senescence assay

Senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase (SA‐β‐gal) activity was determined using the Cellular Senescence Assay Kit (Millipore), according to the manufacturer's specifications. In this assay, SA‐β‐gal catalyzes the hydrolysis of X‐gal, which results in the accumulation of a distinctive blue color in senescent cells. Cells were seeded in 6‐well culture dishes at 50% confluency, and SA‐β‐gal activity was determined. For each condition, 200 cells were counted and evaluated for their blue color under a microscope. Images were captured using a Zeiss observer Z1 inverted microscope, with a 40× Apochromat objective (Zeiss) and an ORCA‐ER cooled CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics). Axiovision software (Zeiss) was used to acquire images. Experiments were repeated three times independently. Errors bars represent mean ± SEM and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.

Transwell migration assay

Cell migration was assessed using a transwell assay as described previously (Ferreira‐da‐Silva et al, 2015). Briefly, cells were serum‐starved for 3 h at 37°C 5% CO2 and resuspended in serum‐free DMEM. The cells (10,000) were then seeded in the upper chamber of a 24‐well transwell (Permeable Supports), using a 6.5‐mm insert with 8.0‐μm polycarbonate membrane (Costar), pre‐coated with 10 μg/ml fibronectin from bovine plasma (Sigma). The lower chamber was filled with serum‐free DMEM or serum‐free DMEM supplemented with 30 ng/ml human platelet‐derived growth factor (Millipore). Cells were incubated 16 h at 37°C 5% CO2 and then fixed in 5% PFA. After three washes in PBS, non‐migrating cells were removed. Filters were then removed and mounted on 10‐well diagnostic microscope slides (Thermo Scientific), in Vectashield mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories). Nuclei of cells that had migrated were visualized using DAPI staining on a Zeiss Imager M2 microscope equipped with a Plan Apochromat 20× 0.8 NA objective. Images were generated using Stereo Investigator software (MBF Bioscience). Each cell present in a field was counted and five random fields were analyzed per condition in three independent experiments. Error bars represent mean ± SD and P‐values were calculated using a t‐test.

Lipidomic analysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC‐MS)

Procedures for lipid extraction and analysis by LC‐MS are essentially as described in references (Matyash et al, 2008; Sandra et al, 2010). Briefly, lipids were extracted from isolated mitochondria (100 μg protein), which had been spiked with six internal standards. Samples (equivalent to 1.3 μg of protein extract) were injected onto a 1290 Infinity HPLC coupled with a 6530 accurate mass QTOF (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) via a dual electrospray ion source. Lipids were eluted onto a Zorbax Eclipse plus C18, 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) kept at 40°C with a gradient of 83 min and were analyzed in both negative and positive scan mode. Area signal was normalized using an internal standard of glycerophosphatidylglycerol (15:0/15:0). Tandem MS was performed to confirm lipids subclass of glycerophosphocholines (PC), glycerophosphoethanolamines (PE), glycerophosphoserines (PS), and glycerophosphates (PA). The experiment was repeated three times. Normalized data were analyzed using an unpaired t‐test and statistical significance was set at < 0.05.

Statistical analysis

All data are reported as means ± SEM or means ± SD as indicated in the figure legend. Statistical significance was determined using Student's two‐tailed unpaired t‐tests. P‐values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and labeled as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Author contributions

AJ led the project, designed, and performed experiments and co‐wrote the manuscript. JP performed fluorescence microscopy analysis of DRP1 localization and ER morphology and migration experiments. VP provided cell extracts knocked down for MIC60 and MIC19 and performed the oxygen consumption experiments using Seahorse. NS performed the oxygen consumption experiments using Clark‐type electrodes. SF and JM designed and performed the genetics analysis. GM diagnosed and managed the subject. Z‐YL and A‐CG designed and performed the BioID analysis. CDR and AF supervised and carried out the lipid analyses. HMM contributed to experimental design. EAS helped with experimental design, supervised the project, and co‐wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

The paper explained.

Problem

Leigh syndrome is an early‐onset, fatal, neurodegenerative disorder that is genetically heterogeneous. The genetic cause remains unknown in many Leigh syndrome patients and the mechanisms of pathogenesis are not well understood.

Results

Using whole‐exome sequencing, we uncovered missense mutations in SLC25A46, a degenerate member of the mitochondrial metabolite carrier family. Unlike most members of this family, SLC25A46 localizes to the outer membrane. It interacts with components of the fusion/fission machinery (OPA1, MFN2), the complex that organizes mitochondrial cristae (MICOS), and the EMC complex in the ER, the yeast homologue of which has been proposed to act as a mitochondrial/ER tether. Mitochondria in subject fibroblasts were hyperfused, and there was a severe disruption of mitochondrial architecture. Most mitochondria were long and narrow with shortened or absent cristae. ER morphology was also substantially altered, becoming more sheet‐like, in subject fibroblasts. These data suggested that SLC25A46 could be involved in facilitating lipid transfer between the ER and mitochondria, and lipidomic analyses of purified mitochondria from the subject showed a markedly altered phospholipid profile. Finally, loss of SLC25A46 function resulted in upregulation of markers of cellular senescence in mitotic cells in culture, suggesting that inefficient mitochondrial division, likely due to an insufficient supply of lipids, signals an exit from the cell cycle.

Impact

This is the first description of a protein involved in mitochondrial dynamics associated with Leigh syndrome. This case expands the clinical phenotype of mutations associated with mutations in SLC25A46, as most previously reported cases presented with a milder clinical phenotype. The newly identified links between MFN2, OPA1, MICOS, and EMC indicate that SLC25A46 mechanistically couples lipid flux between the ER and mitochondria directly at outer/inner mitochondrial membrane contacts, contributing to our understanding of the molecular pathology underlying Leigh syndrome.

Supporting information

Appendix

Expanded View Figures PDF

Source Data for Expanded View

Review Process File

Source Data for Figure 1

Source Data for Figure 2

Source Data for Figure 3

Source Data for Figure 4

Source Data for Figure 7

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the CIHR to EAS (MT15460), CIHR 123398 to HMM, CIHR to CDR (9505), and an NSERC Discovery grant RGPIN‐2014‐06434 and Accelerator Supplement RGPAS 462169 to ACG. JP was supported by CIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship (MFE‐140925). The Lunenfeld proteomics facility is partially supported by a Genome Canada Genomics Innovation Network (GIN) node grant, administered through the Ontario Genomics Institute. ACG holds a Canada Research Chair in Functional Proteomics and the Lea Reichmann Chair in Cancer Proteomics. We thank the Facility for Electron Microscopy Research (FEMR) of McGill University. We thank Tamiko Nishimura for fruitful discussions.

EMBO Mol Med (2016) 8: 1019–1038

References

  1. Abrams AJ, Hufnagel RB, Rebelo A, Zanna C, Patel N, Gonzalez MA, Campeanu IJ, Griffin LB, Groenewald S, Strickland AV et al (2015) Mutations in SLC25A46, encoding a UGO1‐like protein, cause an optic atrophy spectrum disorder. Nat Genet 47: 926–932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7: 248–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander C, Votruba M, Pesch UE, Thiselton DL, Mayer S, Moore A, Rodriguez M, Kellner U, Leo‐Kottler B, Auburger G et al (2000) OPA1, encoding a dynamin‐related GTPase, is mutated in autosomal dominant optic atrophy linked to chromosome 3q28. Nat Genet 26: 211–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anand R, Wai T, Baker MJ, Kladt N, Schauss AC, Rugarli E, Langer T (2014) The i‐AAA protease YME1L and OMA1 cleave OPA1 to balance mitochondrial fusion and fission. J Cell Biol 204: 919–929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anton F, Fres JM, Schauss A, Pinson B, Praefcke GJ, Langer T, Escobar‐Henriques M (2011) Ugo1 and Mdm30 act sequentially during Fzo1‐mediated mitochondrial outer membrane fusion. J Cell Sci 124: 1126–1135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burelle Y, Bemeur C, Rivard ME, Thompson Legault J, Boucher G, Consortium L, Morin C, Coderre L, Des Rosiers C (2015) Mitochondrial vulnerability and increased susceptibility to nutrient‐induced cytotoxicity in fibroblasts from leigh syndrome French canadian patients. PLoS ONE 10: e0120767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Castanier C, Garcin D, Vazquez A, Arnoult D (2010) Mitochondrial dynamics regulate the RIG‐I‐like receptor antiviral pathway. EMBO Rep 11: 133–138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen KH, Guo X, Ma D, Guo Y, Li Q, Yang D, Li P, Qiu X, Wen S, Xiao RP et al (2004) Dysregulation of HSG triggers vascular proliferative disorders. Nat Cell Biol 6: 872–883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Civiletto G, Varanita T, Cerutti R, Gorletta T, Barbaro S, Marchet S, Lamperti C, Viscomi C, Scorrano L, Zeviani M (2015) Opa1 overexpression ameliorates the phenotype of two mitochondrial disease mouse models. Cell Metab 21: 845–854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cogliati S, Frezza C, Soriano ME, Varanita T, Quintana‐Cabrera R, Corrado M, Cipolat S, Costa V, Casarin A, Gomes LC et al (2013) Mitochondrial cristae shape determines respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly and respiratory efficiency. Cell 155: 160–171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coonrod EM, Karren MA, Shaw JM (2007) Ugo1p is a multipass transmembrane protein with a single carrier domain required for mitochondrial fusion. Traffic 8: 500–511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Couzens AL, Knight JD, Kean MJ, Teo G, Weiss A, Dunham WH, Lin ZY, Bagshaw RD, Sicheri F, Pawson T et al (2013) Protein interaction network of the mammalian Hippo pathway reveals mechanisms of kinase‐phosphatase interactions. Sci Signal 6: rs15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Darshi M, Mendiola VL, Mackey MR, Murphy AN, Koller A, Perkins GA, Ellisman MH, Taylor SS (2011) ChChd3, an inner mitochondrial membrane protein, is essential for maintaining crista integrity and mitochondrial function. J Biol Chem 286: 2918–2932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Delettre C, Lenaers G, Griffoin JM, Gigarel N, Lorenzo C, Belenguer P, Pelloquin L, Grosgeorge J, Turc‐Carel C, Perret E et al (2000) Nuclear gene OPA1, encoding a mitochondrial dynamin‐related protein, is mutated in dominant optic atrophy. Nat Genet 26: 207–210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fahiminiya S, Majewski J, Mort J, Moffatt P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F (2013) Mutations in WNT1 are a cause of osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 50: 345–348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fahiminiya S, Al‐Jallad H, Majewski J, Palomo T, Moffatt P, Roschger P, Klaushofer K, Glorieux FH, Rauch F (2015) A polyadenylation site variant causes transcript‐specific BMP1 deficiency and frequent fractures in children. Hum Mol Genet 24: 516–524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferreira‐da‐Silva A, Valacca C, Rios E, Populo H, Soares P, Sobrinho‐Simoes M, Scorrano L, Maximo V, Campello S (2015) Mitochondrial dynamics protein Drp1 is overexpressed in oncocytic thyroid tumors and regulates cancer cell migration. PLoS ONE 10: e0122308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Frezza C, Cipolat S, Martins de Brito O, Micaroni M, Beznoussenko GV, Rudka T, Bartoli D, Polishuck RS, Danial NN, De Strooper B et al (2006) OPA1 controls apoptotic cristae remodeling independently from mitochondrial fusion. Cell 126: 177–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Friedman JR, Lackner LL, West M, DiBenedetto JR, Nunnari J, Voeltz GK (2011) ER tubules mark sites of mitochondrial division. Science 334: 358–362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gomes LC, Di Benedetto G, Scorrano L (2011) During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability. Nat Cell Biol 13: 589–598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guarani V, McNeill EM, Paulo JA, Huttlin EL, Frohlich F, Gygi SP, Van Vactor D, Harper JW (2015) QIL1 is a novel mitochondrial protein required for MICOS complex stability and cristae morphology. eLife 4: e06265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haferkamp I, Schmitz‐Esser S (2012) The plant mitochondrial carrier family: functional and evolutionary aspects. Front Plant Sci 3: 2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harel T, Yesil G, Bayram Y, Coban‐Akdemir Z, Charng WL, Karaca E, Al Asmari A, Eldomery MK, Hunter JV, Jhangiani SN et al (2016) Monoallelic and biallelic variants in EMC1 identified in individuals with global developmental delay, hypotonia, scoliosis, and cerebellar atrophy. Am J Hum Genet 98: 562–570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harner M, Korner C, Walther D, Mokranjac D, Kaesmacher J, Welsch U, Griffith J, Mann M, Reggiori F, Neupert W (2011) The mitochondrial contact site complex, a determinant of mitochondrial architecture. EMBO J 30: 4356–4370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hinttala R, Sasarman F, Nishimura T, Antonicka H, Brunel‐Guitton C, Schwartzentruber J, Fahiminiya S, Majewski J, Faubert D, Ostergaard E et al (2015) An N‐terminal formyl methionine on COX 1 is required for the assembly of cytochrome c oxidase. Hum Mol Genet 24: 4103–4113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoppins S, Horner J, Song C, McCaffery JM, Nunnari J (2009) Mitochondrial outer and inner membrane fusion requires a modified carrier protein. J Cell Biol 184: 569–581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoppins S, Collins SR, Cassidy‐Stone A, Hummel E, Devay RM, Lackner LL, Westermann B, Schuldiner M, Weissman JS, Nunnari J (2011) A mitochondrial‐focused genetic interaction map reveals a scaffold‐like complex required for inner membrane organization in mitochondria. J Cell Biol 195: 323–340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Huynen MA, Muhlmeister M, Gotthardt K, Guerrero‐Castillo S, Brandt U (2016) Evolution and structural organization of the mitochondrial contact site (MICOS) complex and the mitochondrial intermembrane space bridging (MIB) complex. Biochim Biophys Acta 1863: 91–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jonikas MC, Collins SR, Denic V, Oh E, Quan EM, Schmid V, Weibezahn J, Schwappach B, Walter P, Weissman JS et al (2009) Comprehensive characterization of genes required for protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 323: 1693–1697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kasahara A, Cipolat S, Chen Y, Dorn GW II, Scorrano L (2013) Mitochondrial fusion directs cardiomyocyte differentiation via calcineurin and Notch signaling. Science 342: 734–737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non‐synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4: 1073–1081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. van der Laan M, Bohnert M, Wiedemann N, Pfanner N (2012) Role of MINOS in mitochondrial membrane architecture and biogenesis. Trends Cell Biol 22: 185–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lahiri S, Chao JT, Tavassoli S, Wong AK, Choudhary V, Young BP, Loewen CJ, Prinz WA (2014) A conserved endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC) facilitates phospholipid transfer from the ER to mitochondria. PLoS Biol 12: e1001969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lake NJ, Compton AG, Rahman S, Thorburn DR (2016) Leigh syndrome: one disorder, more than 75 monogenic causes. Ann Neurol 79: 190–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lamarca V, Sanz‐Clemente A, Perez‐Pe R, Martinez‐Lorenzo MJ, Halaihel N, Muniesa P, Carrodeguas JA (2007) Two isoforms of PSAP/MTCH1 share two proapoptotic domains and multiple internal signals for import into the mitochondrial outer membrane. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C1347–C1361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Leary SC (2012) Blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: a powerful diagnostic tool for the detection of assembly defects in the enzyme complexes of oxidative phosphorylation. Methods Mol Biol 837: 195–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee S, Jeong SY, Lim WC, Kim S, Park YY, Sun X, Youle RJ, Cho H (2007) Mitochondrial fission and fusion mediators, hFis1 and OPA1, modulate cellular senescence. J Biol Chem 282: 22977–22983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Leigh D (1951) Subacute necrotizing encephalomyelopathy in an infant. J Neurochem 14: 216–221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lochmuller H, Johns T, Shoubridge EA (1999) Expression of the E6 and E7 genes of human papillomavirus (HPV16) extends the life span of human myoblasts. Exp Cell Res 248: 186–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Matyash V, Liebisch G, Kurzchalia TV, Shevchenko A, Schwudke D (2008) Lipid extraction by methyl‐tert‐butyl ether for high‐throughput lipidomics. J Lipid Res 49: 1137–1146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M et al (2010) The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next‐generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20: 1297–1303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Meeusen S, DeVay R, Block J, Cassidy‐Stone A, Wayson S, McCaffery JM, Nunnari J (2006) Mitochondrial inner‐membrane fusion and crista maintenance requires the dynamin‐related GTPase Mgm1. Cell 127: 383–395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mitra K, Wunder C, Roysam B, Lin G, Lippincott‐Schwartz J (2009) A hyperfused mitochondrial state achieved at G1‐S regulates cyclin E buildup and entry into S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 11960–11965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Monne M, Palmieri F, Kunji ER (2013) The substrate specificity of mitochondrial carriers: mutagenesis revisited. Mol Membr Biol 30: 149–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Monne M, Palmieri F (2014) Antiporters of the mitochondrial carrier family. Curr Top Membr 73: 289–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Munoz‐Gomez SA, Slamovits CH, Dacks JB, Baier KA, Spencer KD, Wideman JG (2015) Ancient homology of the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system points to an endosymbiotic origin of mitochondrial cristae. Curr Biol 25: 1489–1495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nguyen M, Boesten I, Hellebrekers D, Mulder‐den Hartog NM, de Coo I, Smeets H, Gerards M (2016) Novel pathogenic SLC25A46 splice‐site mutation causes an optic atrophy spectrum disorder. Clin Genet doi:10.1111/cge.12774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Osellame LD, Singh AP, Stroud DA, Palmer CS, Stojanovski D, Ramachandran R, Ryan MT (2016) Cooperative and independent roles of Drp1 adaptors Mff and MiD49/51 in mitochondrial fission. J Cell Sci 129: 2170–2180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Otera H, Miyata N, Kuge O, Mihara K (2016) Drp1‐dependent mitochondrial fission via MiD49/51 is essential for apoptotic cristae remodeling. J Cell Biol 212: 531–544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ott C, Dorsch E, Fraunholz M, Straub S, Kozjak‐Pavlovic V (2015) Detailed analysis of the human mitochondrial contact site complex indicate a hierarchy of subunits. PLoS ONE 10: e0120213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Palmer CS, Osellame LD, Stojanovski D, Ryan MT (2011) The regulation of mitochondrial morphology: intricate mechanisms and dynamic machinery. Cell Signal 23: 1534–1545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Palmer CS, Elgass KD, Parton RG, Osellame LD, Stojanovski D, Ryan MT (2013) Adaptor proteins MiD49 and MiD51 can act independently of Mff and Fis1 in Drp1 recruitment and are specific for mitochondrial fission. J Biol Chem 288: 27584–27593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Palmieri F (2014) Mitochondrial transporters of the SLC25 family and associated diseases: a review. J Inherit Metab Dis 37: 565–575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Papic D, Krumpe K, Dukanovic J, Dimmer KS, Rapaport D (2011) Multispan mitochondrial outer membrane protein Ugo1 follows a unique Mim1‐dependent import pathway. J Cell Biol 194: 397–405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Park YY, Lee S, Karbowski M, Neutzner A, Youle RJ, Cho H (2010) Loss of MARCH5 mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin ligase induces cellular senescence through dynamin‐related protein 1 and mitofusin 1. J Cell Sci 123: 619–626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Patten DA, Wong J, Khacho M, Soubannier V, Mailloux RJ, Pilon‐Larose K, MacLaurin JG, Park DS, McBride HM, Trinkle‐Mulcahy L et al (2014) OPA1‐dependent cristae modulation is essential for cellular adaptation to metabolic demand. EMBO J 33: 2676–2691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pfanner N, van der Laan M, Amati P, Capaldi RA, Caudy AA, Chacinska A, Darshi M, Deckers M, Hoppins S, Icho T et al (2014) Uniform nomenclature for the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system. J Cell Biol 204: 1083–1086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Prudent J, Zunino R, Sugiura A, Mattie S, Shore GC, McBride HM (2015) MAPL SUMOylation of Drp1 stabilizes an ER/mitochondrial platform required for cell death. Mol Cell 59: 941–955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rambold AS, Kostelecky B, Elia N, Lippincott‐Schwartz J (2011) Tubular network formation protects mitochondria from autophagosomal degradation during nutrient starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 10190–10195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Robinson AJ, Kunji ER, Gross A (2012) Mitochondrial carrier homolog 2 (MTCH2): the recruitment and evolution of a mitochondrial carrier protein to a critical player in apoptosis. Exp Cell Res 318: 1316–1323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Roux KJ, Kim DI, Raida M, Burke B (2012) A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 196: 801–810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ruhoy IS, Saneto RP (2014) The genetics of Leigh syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management. Appl Clin Genet 7: 221–234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rustin P, Chretien D, Bourgeron T, Gerard B, Rotig A, Saudubray JM, Munnich A (1994) Biochemical and molecular investigations in respiratory chain deficiencies. Clin Chim Acta 228: 35–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sandra K, Pereira AS, Vanhoenacker G, David F, Sandra P (2010) Comprehensive blood plasms lipidomicsby liquid chromatography/quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry. J Cromatogr A 1217: 4087–4099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Schwarz JM, Rodelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D (2010) MutationTaster evaluates disease‐causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods 7: 575–576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Scorrano L, Ashiya M, Buttle K, Weiler S, Oakes SA, Mannella CA, Korsmeyer SJ (2002) A distinct pathway remodels mitochondrial cristae and mobilizes cytochrome c during apoptosis. Dev Cell 2: 55–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sesaki H, Jensen RE (2001) UGO1 encodes an outer membrane protein required for mitochondrial fusion. J Cell Biol 152: 1123–1134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sesaki H, Jensen RE (2004) Ugo1p links the Fzo1p and Mgm1p GTPases for mitochondrial fusion. J Biol Chem 279: 28298–28303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Shutt T, Geoffrion M, Milne R, McBride HM (2012) The intracellular redox state is a core determinant of mitochondrial fusion. EMBO Rep 13: 909–915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sood A, Jeyaraju DV, Prudent J, Caron A, Lemieux P, McBride HM, Laplante M, Toth K, Pellegrini L (2014) A Mitofusin‐2‐dependent inactivating cleavage of Opa1 links changes in mitochondria cristae and ER contacts in the postprandial liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 16017–16022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Stevenson LF, Kennedy BK, Harlow E (2001) A large‐scale overexpression screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies previously uncharacterized cell cycle genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 3946–3951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Tamura Y, Sesaki H, Endo T (2014) Phospholipid transport via mitochondria. Traffic 15: 933–945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tondera D, Grandemange S, Jourdain A, Karbowski M, Mattenberger Y, Herzig S, Da Cruz S, Clerc P, Raschke I, Merkwirth C et al (2009) SLP‐2 is required for stress‐induced mitochondrial hyperfusion. EMBO J 28: 1589–1600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Varanita T, Soriano ME, Romanello V, Zaglia T, Quintana‐Cabrera R, Semenzato M, Menabo R, Costa V, Civiletto G, Pesce P et al (2015) The opa1‐dependent mitochondrial cristae remodeling pathway controls atrophic, apoptotic, and ischemic tissue damage. Cell Metab 21: 834–844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Vogtle FN, Keller M, Taskin AA, Horvath SE, Guan XL, Prinz C, Opalinska M, Zorzin C, van der Laan M, Wenk MR et al (2015) The fusogenic lipid phosphatidic acid promotes the biogenesis of mitochondrial outer membrane protein Ugo1. J Cell Biol 210: 951–960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Weraarpachai W, Antonicka H, Sasarman F, Seeger J, Schrank B, Kolesar JE, Lochmuller H, Chevrette M, Kaufman BA, Horvath R et al (2009) Mutation in TACO1, encoding a translational activator of COX I, results in cytochrome c oxidase deficiency and late‐onset Leigh syndrome. Nat Genet 41: 833–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhu Z, Yao J, Johns T, Fu K, De Bie I, Macmillan C, Cuthbert AP, Newbold RF, Wang J, Chevrette M et al (1998) SURF1, encoding a factor involved in the biogenesis of cytochrome c oxidase, is mutated in Leigh syndrome [see comments]. Nat Genet 20: 337–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Zuchner S, Mersiyanova IV, Muglia M, Bissar‐Tadmouri N, Rochelle J, Dadali EL, Zappia M, Nelis E, Patitucci A, Senderek J et al (2004) Mutations in the mitochondrial GTPase mitofusin 2 cause Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth neuropathy type 2A. Nat Genet 36: 449–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

Expanded View Figures PDF

Source Data for Expanded View

Review Process File

Source Data for Figure 1

Source Data for Figure 2

Source Data for Figure 3

Source Data for Figure 4

Source Data for Figure 7


Articles from EMBO Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES