Abstract
AIM: To investigate the effect on urine culture results and their clinical interpretation of delaying the processing of urine samples in which boric acid had been used as a preservative. METHODS: 792 mid-stream specimens of urine from patients attending their general practitioner were received in borate containing plastic jars. The specimens were cultured upon receipt, stored at room temperature, and then recultured the following morning. RESULTS: After overnight delayed culture, the results were altered in 16% of samples and the clinical interpretation of these findings differed in 8% of specimens. In 28 samples (3.5%) the bacterium isolated on initial culture was not the same as that obtained by culture after overnight storage. CONCLUSIONS: Boric acid urine preservation used for overnight delayed processing of samples is associated with a significant alteration in culture results and the attendant clinical interpretation of such specimens. Rapid transportation/processing of urine specimens must remain the optimum procedure.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Lum K. T., Meers P. D. Boric acid converts urine into an effective bacteriostatic transport medium. J Infect. 1989 Jan;18(1):51–58. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(89)93667-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meers P. D., Chow C. K. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal actions of boric acid against bacteria and fungi commonly found in urine. J Clin Pathol. 1990 Jun;43(6):484–487. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.6.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nickander K. K., Shanholtzer C. J., Peterson L. R. Urine culture transport tubes: effect of sample volume on bacterial toxicity of the preservative. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):593–595. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.593-595.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porter I. A., Brodie J. Boric acid preservation of urine samples. Br Med J. 1969 May 10;2(5653):353–355. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5653.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- URQUHART G. E., GOULD J. C. SIMPLIFIED TECHNIQUE FOR COUNTING THE NUMBER OF BACTERIA IN URINE AND OTHER FLUIDS. J Clin Pathol. 1965 Jul;18:480–482. doi: 10.1136/jcp.18.4.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watson P. G., Duerden B. I. Laboratory assessment of physical and chemical methods of preserving urine specimens. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jun;30(6):532–536. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.6.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wheldon D. B., Slack M. Multiplication of contaminant bacteria in urine and interpretation of delayed culture. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;30(7):615–619. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.7.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]