Stanniocalcin-1 Expression in Normal Human Endometrium and Dysregulation in Endometriosis

Abstract

Objective

To determine expression of stanniocalcin-1 (STC1) in human endometrium with and without endometriosis and its regulation by steroid hormones.

Design

Laboratory study.

Setting

University.

Patients

19 women with endometriosis and 33 control women.

Intervention(s)

Endometrial biopsy and fluid sampling

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Analysis of early secretory (ESE) and mid-secretory (MSE) endometrial secretomes from fertile women with nano-LC/MS/MS; real-time Q-PCR and immunohistochemistry for STC1 and its receptor CASR mRNA and proteins in endometrium with and without endometriosis; evaluation of STC1 and CASR mRNA expression in endometrial stromal fibroblasts (eSF) from women with and without endometriosis decidualized with E₂P₄ or 8-bromo-cAMP.

Results

STC1 protein was strongly upregulated (p=0.0004) in MSE versus ESE in endometrial fluid of fertile women. STC1 mRNA significantly increased in MSE from women with, but not without endometriosis, compared to proliferative endometrium (PE) or ESE, with no significant difference throughout the menstrual cycle between groups. STC1 mRNA in eSF from control women increased >230-fold upon decidualization with cAMP versus 45-fold from women with endometriosis, which was not seen upon decidualization with E₂/P₄. CASR mRNA did not exhibit significant differences in any condition, and was not expressed in isolated eSF. STC1 protein immunoexpression in eSF was significantly lower in women with endometriosis compared to controls.

Conclusions

STC1 protein is significantly upregulated in MSE endometrial fluid, and is dysregulated in eutopic endometrial tissue from women with endometriosis. It is likely regulated by cAMP and may be involved in the pathogenesis of decidualization defects.

Introduction

Human endometrium is a dynamic tissue that undergoes cyclic morphological and molecular changes under a changing hormonal milieu and plays a central role in human implantation. Endometrial tissue in humans and other mammals is a target of extensive research with the goal to increase understanding of its physiology and pathophysiology and improve treatment of gynecological pathologies such as endometriosis, adenomyosis, recurrent pregnancy loss, as well as implantation failure and unexplained infertility.

High-throughput ‘omics’ studies of global gene expression profiling in human endometrium have identified stanniocalcin-1 (STC1) as an important player in normal and diseased endometrial functions. STC is expressed in pre-pregnancy endometrium and early pregnancy decidua in rats and pigs, is regulated by estrogen and progesterone, and has been suggested as an implantation marker in pig endometrium (1, 2). In humans, consistent mid-secretory endometrial (MSE) STC1 gene expression was demonstrated in patients who conceived with the help of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) (3). STC1 was significantly upregulated in microarray analysis of MSE of the normal menstrual cycle compared to early secretory endometrium (ESE) (4), and was down-regulated in microarray analysis of MSE from women with unexplained infertility versus fertile control subjects (5), suggesting a possible role in human endometrial receptivity and implantation. Placental expression of STC1 was documented in a well-designed microarray study of women with pregnancy complications, which demonstrated an increased STC1 in placenta and serum at term in women with pregnancy complications, particularly pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age babies (6).

STC1 is a glycoprotein phosphorylated by protein kinase C (7) initially described in a bony fish produced by unique endocrine glands, the corpuscles of Stannius, eliciting antihypercalcemic and antihypophosphatemic responses in various tissues (8, 9). In mammals, STC1 is expressed in a wide variety of tissues, and interestingly is not detected in the circulation under normal conditions, except pregnancy (9-11), suggesting an autocrine/paracrine rather than an endocrine function. STC1 in mammals is not necessarily directly linked to calcium/phosphorus pathways, but rather is regulated by multiple factors (reviewed in (9)). Its roles in calcium homeostasis, bone and muscle formation, angiogenesis and reproduction were demonstrated in experiments with transgenic mice that experienced growth retardation and small litter size (11, 12).

The STC receptor, Ca-sensing receptor (CASR), is a G-protein-coupled receptor, initially identified in bovine parathyroid cells and expressed in wide variety of tissues including ovaries and uterus in human and rodents (13-15). Its major physiologic role is believed to be maintenance of calcium homeostasis, including regulation of secretion, gene expression, cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis (13, 16). CASR was found to mediate STC1 secretion in response to extracellular calcium fluctuation in fish (17). It is expressed in first trimester and term human placenta (18, 19), and is induced during implantation and decidualization in rat uterus (15).

Based on the above, there is yet limited data on human endometrial STC1 expression, regulation and signaling through its receptor. We, therefore, aimed to investigate expression of STC1 and its receptor in human endometrium and regulation of STC1 in human endometrial stromal fibroblasts in women without and with endometriosis in an effort to determine potential roles for this protein/receptor complex in normal and abnormal endometrial function.

Materials and Methods

Study subjects and materials

Endometrial samples were obtained through the UCSF NIH Human Endometrial Tissue and DNA Bank and from healthy volunteers at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden and Tartu University Women's Clinic, Tartu, Estonia with appropriate IRB (UCSF) and The Ethics Committees (Karolinska Institute and University of Tartu) approvals. Written informed consents were obtained from all participating subjects. Table 1 summarizes characteristics of all participating women and the techniques applied for analyzing the samples herein.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients donated endometrial biopsy or fluid samples for the study.

Patient	Cycle phase	Type of experiment	Diagnosis at laparoscopy	Age	Ethnicity
Endometriosis
233	MSE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Mild endometriosis, pelvic pain	31	Caucasian
243	ESE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Minimal endometriosis, bilateral ovarian cyst, intramural myoma	46	Caucasian
267	LSE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Mild endometriosis, pelvic pain	32	Caucasian
268	Not Evaluated	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Mild endometriosis, intramural myoma	38	Asian
288	PE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Severe endometriosis	22	Caucasian
270	PE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Mild endometriosis	49	Caucasian
651	PE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe endometriosis/endometrioma, chronic pelvic pain, fibroid uterus	37	Caucasian
575	PE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe endometriosis/endometrioma, chronic pelvic pain,	26	Unknown
587	PE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe peritoneal, rectovaginal endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain	36	Caucasian
ST90	PE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe pelvic endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain	42	Caucasian
607	ESE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe peritoneal and rectovaginal endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain	24	Asian
517	ESE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe peritoneal endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, fibroids, infertility	35	Unknown
ST112	ESE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe peritoneal endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain	38	Caucasian
645	MSE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe peritoneal endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain	39	Asian Indian
678	MSE	Tissue Q-PCR, immunohistochemistry	Severe endometriosis, fibroid uterus, chronic pelvic pain	44	Caucasian
ST96	MSE	Tissue Q-PCR	Severe peritoneal endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain	31	Caucasian
635	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Mild endometriosis, bleeding, intramural myoma	42	Caucasian
516	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Severe endometriosis, intramural myoma	34	Asian
540	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Severe rectovaginal endometriosis	37	Caucasian
No Endometriosis
229	LSE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Pelvic pain (no endometriosis at laparoscopy)	47	Caucasian
236	PE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Symptomatic pelvic prolapse	47	Caucasian
237	ESE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Intramural myoma, left paratubal cyst	39	Caucasian
238	ESE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Endometrial polyp	41	Black
285	PE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Intramural myoma, pelvic adhesions	37	Caucasian
293	PE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Intramural myoma	49	Caucasian
310	PE	Cell culture and decidualization, Q-PCR	Intramural myoma, enterocele	41	Asian
ME 09	PE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Undesired fertility	37	Caucasian
M182	PE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Healthy volunteer	34	Caucasian
M169	PE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Healthy volunteer	32	Caucasian
ETB038	PE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Egg donor, natural cycle biopsy	23	Caucasian
ETB048	PE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Egg donor, natural cycle biopsy	28	Black
ETB065	PE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Egg donor, natural cycle biopsy	29	Caucasian
ME 34	ESE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Undesired fertility	33	Caucasian
ME 13	ESE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Pelvic pain (no endometriosis at laparoscopy)	33	Black
ME 42	ESE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Undesired fertility	37	Caucasian
ME 36	MSE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Undesired fertility	35	Black
ME 50	MSE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Undesired fertility	35	Caucasian
16	MSE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Healthy fertile volunteer	42	Unknown
22	MSE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Healthy fertile volunteer	40	Unknown
30	MSE	Tissue, Q-PCR	Healthy fertile volunteer	35	Unknown
MM1	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Healthy fertile volunteer	36	Caucasian
MM2	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Healthy fertile volunteer	41	Caucasian
MM5	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Healthy fertile volunteer	30	Caucasian
MM16	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Healthy fertile volunteer	35	Caucasian
ST18	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Healthy fertile volunteer	37	Caucasian
ST21	MSE	Immunohistochemistry	Healthy fertile volunteer	35	Caucasian
Secr1	ESE, MSE	Mass-spectrometry, histology	Healthy fertile volunteer	30	Caucasian
Secr2	ESE, MSE	Mass-spectrometry, histology	Healthy fertile volunteer	32	Caucasian
Secr3	ESE, MSE	Mass-spectrometry, histology	Healthy fertile volunteer	32	Caucasian
Secr4	ESE, MSE	Mass-spectrometry, histology	Healthy fertile volunteer	33	Caucasian
Secr5	ESE, MSE	Mass-spectrometry, histology	Healthy fertile volunteer	30	Caucasian
Secr6	ESE, MSE	Mass-spectrometry, histology	Healthy fertile volunteer	29	Caucasian

PE=proliferative endometrium, ESE=early secretory endometrium, MSE=mid-secretory endometrium, LSE=late secretory endometrium, Q-PCR=quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Endometrial secretome samples for proteomics analysis were collected from early secretory (ESE, LH+2) and mid-secretory (MSE, LH+8) phase endometria during the same menstrual cycle from fertile healthy volunteers (n=6) (age 31±1.5 years). The day of the LH surge (LH+0) was determined with a urinary ovulation prediction test (Kaigert, Estonia), as it is an accepted and validated method for predicting ovulation in the clinical and translational research setting; it is also patient friendly, as it is a non-invasive test applicable for self-use at home. However, being aware of substantial inter-patient variability, we supported our endometrial dating with endometrial histology. Histology samples were collected for confirmation of endometrial dating according to the criteria of Noyes et al. (20) and were found to correspond to days 19-24 of the 28-day cycle.

Endometrial biopsies for PCR, immunohistochemistry and cell culture experiments were obtained from subjects with and without endometriosis (n=19 and n=27, respectively). Menstrual cycle phase was assigned by the day of LH surge and endometrial histology as above. In addition, all samples used for mRNA expression analysis were assigned cycle phase using bioinformatics methods (21). Only samples, where all evaluation criteria were in agreement, were used in the study.

Controls (no endometriosis) were healthy 35.6±0.86 years old (range 23-49) women undergoing gynecologic surgery for pelvic pain (no endometriosis found during laparoscopy) or management of fibroids, healthy volunteers without uterine pathology or women undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation. Controls had regular menstrual cycles, were not pregnant, had no history of endometriosis, and had not been on hormonal treatment for at least 3 months before tissue sampling.

Women with endometriosis participating in the study were 35.9±1.65 years old (range 22-49), were not pregnant, and did not use any hormonal medication within at least 3 months before surgery. The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on visualization of lesions during laparoscopy and confirmed by histology. Staging of endometriosis was defined according to the revised American Fertility Society classification system (22).

Out of 19 samples from women with endometriosis and 27 samples from control women (without endometriosis), 14 and 10 whole tissue samples respectively were used for real-time qRT-PCR (n=6 and n=4 in proliferative phase (PE) from women with and without endometriosis, respectively, n=3 early secretory phase endometrium (ESE) in each group, and n=5 and n=3 in mid-secretory endometrium (MSE) from women with and without endometriosis, respectively). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on MSE samples, n=4 and n=6 for endometriosis and no endometriosis groups, respectively.

Isolated endometrial stromal fibroblasts (eSF) from women with (n=6) and without endometriosis (n=7) were used in cell culture experiments (as shown previously, cycle phase does not confound response, (23)).

Early secretory and mid-secretory phase endometrial fluid proteomics analysis

The secretomes were obtained by uterine flushing – i.e., injecting 0.5 ml of PBS into the uterine cavity, followed by aspiration of the fluid. Prior to protein extraction the samples were precleared with centrifugation at 450 g for 5 minutes. The collected secretomes were separated into six fractions according to molecular weight using SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). Proteins were reduced, alkylated and in-gel digested with dimethylated porcine trypsin (Sigma) followed by analysis with nano-LC/MS/MS (Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC and Q Exactive MS/MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The label-free peptide elution profiles of different study subjects were identified and quantified with MaxQuant software package (UniProtKB human reference proteome database, 2014 September version) (24). Label-free data were normalized with MaxLFQ (25) algorithm and compared with paired t-test statistics.

Total RNA isolation and real time RT-PCR

Total RNA from endometrial biopsies and cells was purified using Qiagen RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were stored in RNase-free H₂O and quantified by spectroscopy, and the purity was analyzed by the 260/280 absorbance ratio. RNA quality and integrity was analyzed with Agilent Bioanalyser 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with all samples having high quality RNA (RIN=9.7-10.0). For real-time qRT-PCR analysis, 1 μg of RNA was converted to cDNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Duplicate mRNAs were pooled from each set of treatments. The real-time RT-PCR reaction was carried out for 40 cycles with primers to insulin growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) (eSF only), prolactin (PRL) (eSF only), STC1 (eSF+tissue) and calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) (eSF+tissue). Relative gene expression was normalized with RPL19 as the internal reference, which has been shown to have reproducibility and stable expression in endometrial tissue (23, 26). The following primer sequences were used: IGFBP1 forward, 5′-CTATGATGGCTCGAAGGCTC-3′, reverse, 5′-TTCTTGTTGCAGTTTGGCAG-3′; PRL forward, 5′-CATCAACAGCTGCCACACTT-3′, reverse, 5′-CGTTTGGTTTGCTCCTCAAT-3′; STC1 forward, 5′-GCAGGAAGAGTGCTACAGCAAG-3′, reverse, 5′-CATTCCAGCAGGCTTCGGACAA-3′; CASR forward, 5′-CTCTTCACCAATGGCTCCTGT-3′, reverse, 5′-CCACACTCATCAAAGGTCACCTG-3′; RPL19 forward, 5′-GCAGATAATGGGAGGAGCC-3′, and reverse, 5′-GCCCATCTTTGATGAGCTTC-3′.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded sections (4 μm) of endometrial biopsies were deparaffinized and washed. Antigen retrieval was performed by submerging slides in citrate buffer (1x Citra Plus, Vector Laboratories Inc, Burlingame, CA) at 90°C for 10 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by 3% H₂O₂ in methanol for 10 minutes. Sections were then incubated with 10% blocking normal goat or horse serum in phosphate-buffered saline (Vector Laboratories) for 30 minutes for anti-STC1 (rabbit anti-human polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or CASR (mouse anti-human monoclonal, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) antibodies, respectively. Thereafter, STC1 and CASR primary antibodies were applied at dilutions of 1:150 and 1:200 respectively at 4°C overnight. Non-immune IgG of equivalent concentration from the same species was used as negative control.

The binding of primary antibodies was detected using secondary antibodies: goat anti-rabbit and horse anti-mouse (Vector Laboratories) for 1 hour at room temperature, at a 1:300 dilution for both. After 30 minutes incubation with ABC complex (Vectastain Elite ABC immunoperoxidase detection kit, Vector Laboratories,), diaminobenzidine-hydrogen peroxide substrate (DAB kit, Vector Laboratories) was added to the slides; slides were rinsed with distilled water and counterstained with haematoxylin (Vector Laboratories) and mounted with mounting medium. A Leica microscope was used to evaluate and photograph the slides.

Semi-quantitative evaluation of IHC was performed by two observers blinded to the identity of the slides by using a grading system; each sample was analyzed twice. Staining intensity and the number of stained cells were graded on a following numeric scale: 0 = no staining, +/- = few stained cells, + = faint staining, ++ = moderate staining, and +++ = strong staining. Average value from two observers is presented.

Endometrial stromal cells isolation and culture

Fresh endometrial tissue was digested with collagenase as described (27). Human eSFs were separated from epithelium based on size and plated with DMEM/MCDB-105 medium containing 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum (FBS), insulin (5 μg/ml), gentamicin, penicillin, and streptomycin, as described (23, 26). At passage 2, cells were cultured to near confluence in the same media, followed by changing to low-serum medium (2% FBS) and cultured for 24 hours prior to the onset of treatment. All cell culture experiments were conducted using 2^nd to 4^th cell passages; cell purity (99% stromal fibroblasts) was determined by immunostaining with cytokeratin, vimentin and CD45 antibodies, as described (23).

Decidualization of human endometrial stromal fibroblasts

Human eSFs were treated with 0.5mM 8-Br-cAMP (hereafter referred to as cAMP) for 96 hours or with estradiol (E₂) (10 nM) alone or E₂ (10 nM) plus progesterone (P₄) (1 μM) (E₂/P₄) for 14 days or vehicle. The duration and hormone concentrations were optimized previously (23). 8-Br-cAMP and steroid hormones were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA. All cultures were performed in duplicate. Culture media were changed every other day. Time “zero” (t=0) controls were samples collected before initiation of treatment. Cells lysed in RLT lysis buffer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) containing 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol and culture media were collected after 96 hours of incubation (cAMP-treated samples) or 14 days (E₂/P₄-treated samples).

Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA)

IGFBP1 and prolactin proteins in the culture media were measured to assess the decidualization status of eSFs using ELISA, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Alpha Diagnostic Int., Inc, San Antonio, TX, USA and Diagnostic Systems Labs, Webster, TX, USA, respectively). All samples were assayed in duplicate. A standard curve was run in each experiment. Levels of IGFBP1 and prolactin for each sample were normalized to total RNA. Inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation for the IGFBP1 ELISA were 5-7.4% and 2.4-3.4%, respectively, and for prolactin were 6.7-10.4% and 7.8-8.2%, respectively. Minimum detection limits for PRL and IGFBP1 assays were 0.14 ng/ml and 0.4 ng/ml, respectively.

Statistical evaluation

Statistical analysis for the qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry were performed using the non-parametric one-way ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test. Results from the ELISA analysis demonstrated a normal distribution, and a two-tailed Student's t-test assuming unequal variances was applied. Significance was determined at p≤0.05.

Results

Stanniocalcin-1 protein is up-regulated in mid-secretory phase endometrial secretome

We identified STC1 protein with eight peptides (Supplemental Table 1) in endometrial aspirates from fertile women without endometriosis. Using label-free proteomics data we observed STC1 protein to be significantly (p=0.0004) up-regulated (mean fold change, FC=+39.6) in MSE (LH+8) versus ESE (LH+2) endometrial fluid or secretome (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

A. Stanniocalcin-1 (STC1) protein level is increased in receptive (LH+8) phase endometrial secretome. Paired data from six (n=6) fertile women are presented. X-axis values have been obtained by taking log2 from summed peptide peak areas of STC1 protein in different samples. Paired t-test p-value indicated with significance accepted at p≤0.05. B. Relative expression of STC1 and CASR mRNA in human endometrial tissue throughout the menstrual cycle in women with and without endometriosis. C. Expression of STC1 and CASR mRNA in human endometrial tissue throughout the menstrual cycle in women with endometriosis normalized to samples from women without endometriosis and expressed as fold change. Significance accepted at p≤0.05. PE: proliferative phase endometrium, ESE: early secretory phase endometrium, and MSE: mid-secretory phase endometrium. Non-parametric one-way ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis, and significance was accepted at p≤0.05.

Stanniocalcin-1 and CASR expression in human endometrial tissue, mRNA and protein

In women without endometriosis, endometrial STC1 mRNA expression fluctuated throughout the menstrual cycle; however the differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.088, Figure 1B). In endometrium from women with endometriosis, STC1 mRNA expression significantly increased in MSE compared to PE or ESE (p=0.043, Figure 1B). However, when comparing STC1 mRNA expression in non-endometriosis to endometriosis samples, there was no statistically significant difference in its expression throughout the menstrual cycle (p>0.1, Figure 1C). On the other hand, STC1 receptor CASR mRNA did not change significantly throughout the menstrual cycle in both women with and without endometriosis (p>0.1, Figure 1B), and there was no significant difference when its expression was compared between subjects with versus without endometriosis (p>0.1, Figure 1C).

Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the specific cell-type expression of STC1 protein in mid-secretory human endometrium. We observed cytoplasmic STC1 protein expression in both epithelial and stromal cells from women with and without endometriosis (Figure 2A). STC1 immunoexpression in disease-free women was significantly higher in luminal epithelium and stroma compared to glandular epithelium (p<0.02). In endometriosis, there was no significant difference in STC1 protein expression in epithelial cells; however, its expression in endometrial stromal cells was significantly decreased in women with endometriosis compared to controls (p=0.04, Figure 2A). When analyzing CASR protein immunoexpression, no stromal expression of CASR was observed, while it had faint cytoplasmic expression in epithelial cells, both luminal and glandular, which was not different between specimens from women with versus without endometriosis (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

A. Immunochemical evaluation of STC1 protein expression in mid-secretory human endometrium from women without and with endometriosis. LE=luminal epithelium and GE=glandular epithelium. * - statistically significant difference between LE and GE, and between GE and stroma, p<0.02; # - statistically significant difference in stromal staining between no endometriosis and endometriosis samples, p=0.04. Magnification ×200. One-way Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis, with significance accepted at p≤0.05. B. Immunochemical evaluation of CASR protein expression in mid-secretory human endometrium from women without and with endometriosis. No stromal expression of CASR was observed, and no difference in epithelial (luminal and glandular) staining was noted between specimens from women with versus without endometriosis. Magnification ×200.

Stanniocalcin-1 and CASR expression in cultured human endometrial stromal fibroblasts and effect of decidualization stimuli

Next we investigated the expression of STC1 and CASR mRNA in cultured eSF and their response to decidualization stimuli in vitro. We subjected eSF to short-term decidualization with cAMP for 96 hours or long-term decidualization with P₄ (with estrogen priming) for 14 days, as described in Materials and Methods. Decidualization of eSF was assessed by IGFBP1 and prolactin mRNA and protein secretion (data not shown, but significance reported earlier (23)).

STC1 mRNA expression was dramatically up-regulated by over 230-fold by cAMP in control women (p=0.02 vs. vehicle control) compared to 45-fold in women with endometriosis (p=0.001 vs. vehicle control). However, the difference in degree of decidualization between samples from subjects with or without endometriosis did not reach statistical significance due to large variability between samples (p=0.15, Figure 3A). In contrast, there was no significant change in STC1 mRNA in response to E₂/P₄ stimulus by eSF from women without endometriosis, which did not differ significantly from the response of eSF from women with endometriosis (p=0.2, Figure 3B). CASR mRNA was not detected in any of the eSF samples analyzed in both groups.

Figure 3.

Expression of STC1 mRNA in decidualized human endometrial stromal fibroblasts A. with 0.5 mM cAMP for 96 hours, normalized to 96 hour control, or B. with 10 nM E₂ / 1 μM P₄ for 14 days, normalized to 14 day control. One-way Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis, with significance accepted at p≤0.05.

Discussion

Endometrial STC1 is dysregulated in endometriosis

Herein we demonstrate that STC1 and CASR are expressed in human endometrial tissue. Despite STC1 mRNA detection during various microarray studies on human endometrium under different conditions, there were no attempts to characterize its expression in endometrial cell types and involvement in the decidualization process until now. Yet, the very robust upregulation of STC1 protein in endometrial fluid secretome in mid-secretory versus early secretory phase of healthy subjects reported here can potentially be a clinically relevant finding. Unfortunately, we did not have endometrial fluid secretome available from subjects with endometriosis, which would have made the analysis more robust.

Interestingly, the current data showed a trend to upregulation of STC1 mRNA in ESE versus PE or MSE in control samples in contrast to microarray results from an earlier study (4), and a trend to downregulation of STC1 mRNA in ESE from endometriosis versus no endometriosis samples, which correlated to modest downregulation in a microarray study (28), but was different from upregulation of STC1 in MSE in women with endometriosis herein. It may be suggested that the increase in STC1 mRNA expression in women with endometriosis is an attempt to compensate the simultaneously low receptor expression during MSE in women with endometriosis. These differences could be explained by the fact that in the current study we used samples from an entirely different cohort of patients and our control subjects for this part of the study were carefully selected to not have any uterine or endometrial pathology. In addition, the samples used for mRNA analyses in our study were entirely from subjects with severe endometriosis based on availability of tissue, which, while decreasing heterogeneity of the current results, may explain the discrepancy with earlier reports.

Correlation between mRNA and protein

Significant abundance of STC1 protein in the secretome of receptive mid-secretory endometrium from healthy fertile volunteers is a strong indicator of its involvement in the critical process of implantation. The changes on mRNA level from PE/ESE to MSE were not significant, although there was a trend towards upregulation in control subjects. The discrepancy between transcript and protein expression is not surprising, as the poor correlation between transcript level and the amount of corresponding protein has been shown, specifically in endometrial research (29-31). When analyzing proteomics data in the endometrium from women with versus without endometriosis, Stephens et al (31) did not find a correlation between changes in protein abundance with published transcriptome data (31), suggesting that extensive post-translation control of gene expression occurs in the tissue and is an important factor directly linked to the phenotype. Moreover, Fassbender et al. (29) did not find differences on mRNA level in the secretory endometrium from women with versus without endometriosis, although proteomic analysis of the same samples allowed the diagnosis of endometriosis with high sensitivity and specificity (29).

STC1 regulation via cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) pathway

On the levels of isolated pure human endometrial stromal fibroblasts (eSF) on the other hand, STC1 was significantly and strongly upregulated by cAMP, but not E₂/P₄, in control subjects, suggesting regulation likely mediated via the phosphokinase A (PKA) pathway. In vitro, cAMP was shown to upregulate STC1 gene expression in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) and rat neuroblastoma cells (32, 33) but downregulated it in rat Sertoli and Leydig cells (34). In the rodent male reproductive system the effect of cAMP on STC expression was mediated by PKA pathway, as the phenotype could be rescued by H89, a PKA-pathway inhibitor (34). In rat cortical neurons however, the cAMP effect was mediated through the ERK1/2, not the PKA, pathway (35). In equine endometrium, STC1 was highly up-regulated in pregnant endometrium and expressed exclusively by endometrial glands, although it was not significantly regulated by E₂/P₄ treatment of cultured endometrial explants (36), with the latter being in line with our findings.

STC1 as possible new marker of decidualization

Some inconsistency between MSE whole tissue STC1 qRT-PCR and eSF decidualization results in the present study could derive from differences in tissue cell type composition. However, the PCR results in eSF culture experiments supported to some degree the IHC results, with higher STC1 eSF expression in control samples compared to endometriosis. Dysregulation of STC1 in eutopic endometrium and stromal cells from subjects with endometriosis suggests its involvement in the pathogenesis of decidualization defects. These observations have led us to suggest that STC1 is a potentially new marker of decidualization, with more studies needed to elaborate on that novel concept and the roles of progesterone signaling and the PKA pathway and other pathways in this regard.

CASR in human endometrium

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on the expression of CASR in human endometrium. Calcium homeostasis has been suggested to play a critical role in embryo implantation in rodents and humans, as calcium transporter genes are abundantly expressed in reproductive tissues including endometrium in a cyclic manner, are regulated by ovarian steroid hormones, and their dysregulation affects the expression of some important markers of endometrial receptivity and decreased embryo implantation (37, 38).

As mentioned, CASR, a known mediator of a wide range of calcium-dependent physiological responses in various tissues, mediates STC1 transcription in response to extracellular calcium in fish and is induced in rat endometrium during implantation and subsequent decidualization, particularly in luminal and glandular epithelial cells (15). Herein, CASR did not exhibit variation in its mRNA expression under cyclic hormone influence or in endometriosis on the tissue level. In addition, we did not observe stromal expression of CASR in the samples analyzed, in contrast to its high expression in rat endometrium during implantation and decidualization (15). In our study, absence of amplification of the CASR transcript in eSFs was confirmed by negative stromal immunoexpression of CASR in all samples, in line with an early study on CASR expression in rat luminal epithelium but not stroma (39). In addition, the CASR transcript was not detected in any of the array studies reviewed. This pattern of expression suggests paracrine actions of stromal cell-derived STC1 on endometrial epithelial cells.

Strengths, limitations and conclusions

The strengths of the current study include its novelty, obtaining endometrial flushings and biopsies from well characterized subjects. The limitations are the descriptive nature of the study and relatively small samples size.

Thus, we reported herein on the pattern of STC1 and CASR mRNA and protein expression in endometrial tissue and endometrial stromal cells from women with and without endometriosis. Whether STC1 affects endometrial steroidogenesis, similar to reports in ovarian tissue (40-42), is an appealing question for future investigation.

Further characterization of STC1 expression and function in human endometrium in pathological conditions, such as unexplained infertility, is ongoing, as well as the analysis of secretome in women with unexplained infertility.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1. Identified Stanniocalcin-1 peptides. Sequences along with peptide identification and quantification parameters have been indicated. Note, that when the peptide signal has fallen below the limit of peak integration (limit of quantification), the intensity values are presented as zeros.