Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1993 Jan;46(1):79–80. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.1.79

Evaluation of new streptococcal latex grouping kit.

A F Vicca 1, R E Stansfield 1, R G Masterton 1
PMCID: PMC501121  PMID: 8432896

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate a new streptococcal latex grouping kit (Shield Diagnostics Ltd) and compare it against an established latex agglutination method (Streptex; Wellcome Diagnostics). METHODS: Two hundred and forty seven strains of streptococci and enterococci were tested with each kit by one operator and according to the manufacturer's instructions. Strains failing to group or giving discordant results were identified to species level. RESULTS: Two discrepant grouping results were observed and 13 non-beta haemolytic streptococci failed to group with either product. The Shield kit successfully identified 232 isolates at 15 minutes of enzyme extraction incubation compared with 224 and 233 on short (15 minutes) and long (1 hour) incubations, respectively, for Streptex (p > 0.23 for both comparisons). On short incubation only, the Shield kit detected significantly more strains of Enterococcus faecium (p = 0.007). The reaction strengths were similar for both kits (p > 0.16). No cross-reactions were observed but the Streptex kit produced significantly fewer tests with visible granularity (p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Although the Shield product appeared to detect group D antigen more readily, overall no important differences in performance were observed. Prospective users of the new method should first become familiar with its characteristics.

Full text

PDF
79

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ederer G. M., Herrmann M. M., Bruce R., Matsen J. M., Chapman S. S. Rapid extraction method with pronase B for grouping beta-hemolytic streptococci. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Feb;23(2):285–288. doi: 10.1128/am.23.2.285-288.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Facklam R. R., Cooksey R. C., Wortham E. C. Evaluation of commercial latex agglutination reagents for grouping streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):641–646. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.641-646.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lue Y. A., Howit I. P., Ellner P. D. Rapid grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci by latex agglutination. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Sep;8(3):326–328. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.3.326-328.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Watson B. K., Moellering R. C., Jr, Kunz L. J. Identification of streptococci: use of lysozyme and Streptomyces albus filtrate in the preparation of extracts for Lancefield grouping. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):274–278. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.274-278.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. el Kholy A., Wannamaker L. W., Krause R. M. Simplified extraction procedure for serological grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Nov;28(5):836–839. doi: 10.1128/am.28.5.836-839.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES