Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Sep 6;6:32742. doi: 10.1038/srep32742

Giant strain control of magnetoelectric effect in Ta|Fe|MgO

Dorj Odkhuu 1,a
PMCID: PMC5011689  PMID: 27597448

Abstract

The exploration of electric field controlled magnetism has come under scrutiny for its intriguing magnetoelectric phenomenon as well as technological advances in spintronics. Herein, the tremendous effect of an epitaxial strain on voltage-controlled perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (VPMA) is demonstrated in a transition-metal|ferromagnet|MgO (TM|FM|MgO) heterostructure from first-principles electronic structure computation. By tuning the epitaxial strain in Ta|Fe|MgO as a model system of TM|FM|MgO, we find distinctly different behaviours of VPMA from V- to Λ-shape trends with a substantially large magnetoelectric coefficient, up to an order of 103 fJV−1m−1. We further reveal that the VPMA modulation under strain is mainly governed by the inherently large spin-orbit coupling of Ta 5d–Fe 3d hybridized orbitals at the TM|FM interface, although the Fe 3d–O 2p hybridization at the FM|MgO interface is partly responsible in determining the PMA of Ta|Fe|MgO. These results suggest that the control of epitaxial strain enables the engineering of VPMA, and provides physical insights for the divergent behaviors of VPMA and magnetoelectric coefficients found in TM|FM|MgO experiments.

Intensive and extensive attentions have been drawn to transition-metal capped ferromagnets on insulating MgO (TM|FM|MgO) as a promising candidate in spin-transfer torque (STT) memory, due to the significant magnetoresistence and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), where the spin-polarized current manipulates the spin orientation of a ferromagnet free-layer1,2,3. On the other hand, more recent studies on these magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) focus on another alternative approach that utilizes an electric field (E-field) through the voltage to achieve magnetization switching4,5. The latter is expected to overcome the large critical current density that is required for STT switching. In particular, a small switching energy per bit, preferably less than 1 fJ, is indispensable, which in STT is in an order of 100 fJ6. The large PMA and magnetoelectric (ME) coefficient >200 fJV−1m−1 are favored to lower the switching bit energy to 1 fJ in voltage-controlled PMA (VPMA) junctions6.

While PMA is discovered in several TM|FM|MgO heterostructures, diverse trends of the E-field dependence of VPMA have been demonstrated ranging from linear to V- to Λ-shape behaviors. For example, Ta|CoFeB|MgO and Au|CoFe|MgO exhibit the linear VPMA with magnetoelectric coefficients of −33 and −38 fJV−1m−1, respectively7,8. On the other hand, nonlinear Λ- and V-shape VPMA have also been reported when Fe-rich layers are used as a FM constitute in V|Fe|MgO9 and MgO|FeB|MgO10, which have significantly large magnetoelectrics of −1150 and 108 fJV−1m−1, respectively. There have been numerous subsequent studies since then to clarify the origin of such a wide range of VPMA and ME coefficients. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. It is indeed challenging to straightforwardly answer within a theoretical model because of the limited understanding on a detailed atomic structure, composition, and possible diffusion of boron into MgO3. Apparently, even the physics origin of PMA in TM|FM|MgO multilayers is still not fully understood. The pioneering studies, for instance, have stated that the observed PMA of Ta|CoFeB|MgO is contributed predominantly by the interface layer between the FeCoB and MgO2,4. In recent experimental11,12 and theoretical studies13,14,15, the role of TM capping layers on PMA has also been addressed and cannot be ignored, due to the inherently large spin-orbit coupling (SOC) of 4d and 5d orbitals. The latter studies claimed that the presence of the TM|FM interface is an essential ingredient in determining the PMA11,12,13,14, broadening the common understanding that the Fe 3d–O 2p hybridization is the main origin2,4,16,17.

One of the main causes for different behaviours of VPMA could be an epitaxial strain at the interfaces, either TM|FM and/or FM|MgO, as lattice mismatch occurs quite often in thin films that are epitaxially grown. The validity of this argument has been addressed in a very recent experiment, where an unexpectedly large VPMA modulation of up to 7000 fJV−1m−1 was reported in strained Ta|CoFeB|MgO films18. Such a significant modification of VPMA under strain should be correlated to the strain- and E-field-induced shifts of the relative occupations of d orbitals19, where MA energy (MAE) is determined by the SOC interaction between occupied and unoccupied bands as20

graphic file with name srep32742-m1.jpg

where o(u) and εu (εo) represent the eigenstates and eigenvalues of occupied (unoccupied) states, respectively, and ξ is the strength of SOC interaction. For unstrained bulk Ta and Fe lattices, where c/a = 1, the crystal field under Oh point group splits five-fold degenerate d orbital states into doublets (eg) and triplets (t2g). When the lattice changes from cubic-symmetry c/a = 1 to low-symmetry c/a <1 under an epitaxial strain (in the presence of MgO), as schematically shown in Fig. 1 for the case of Fe|MgO interface, the crystal field splitting (eg into dz2 and dx2−y2, and t2g into dxy, dxz, and dyz) may offer more freedom to provide more energy differences in the denominator of Eq. (1)19. It is therefore important to see how the different energy levels of d orbitals in different crystal symmetry evolve upon an E-field in order to identify the most relevant physics of VPMA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematics for the in-plane lattice matching at the interface between Fe (blue) and MgO layers (yellow) of Ta|Fe|MgO: Compressive strain on MgO lattice (left), expansive strain on Fe lattice (right), or either at the same time under an epitaxial condition (center). The upward arrow in the left indicates the direction of the positive electric field.

Herein, we present results of first-principles calculations to show a decisive role of a strain effect on E-field dependence of VPMA in TM|FM|MgO multilayers. While an asymmetric V-shape E-field dependence of VPMA is demonstrated in Ta|Fe|MgO for the unstrained in-plane lattice of MgO, the compressive strain gives rise to the (lambda)-shape behavior with a substantially large ME coefficient, up to an order of 1000 fJV−1m−1. These are the results of the strain- and field-induced changes of the strong spin-orbit coupled Ta 5d-orbitals hybridized with the Fe 3d-orbital states at the TM|FM interface, and may provide physical insights for the divergent behaviors of VPMA and ME coefficients that are observed in experiments7,8,9,10,18.

Results

It is known that in most TM|FM|MgO multilayers the film thickness of TM and FM layers, especially FM, plays an important role in determining the MAE. In experiments, for example, the typical thickness of FM layers that exhibit PMA in Ta/CoFeB/MgO is within the range of 0.5–1.2 nm2,21. In accord with a realistic situation, we first explore the effect of the Fe thickness (n), ranging n = 3–6 atomic layers or about 0.5–1 nm, on magnetism and MAE in Ta3|Fen|(MgO)5, where the numbers in the subscript denote the number of atomic layers. Considering the lack of generality and reality, the results corresponding to the Ta and Fe thickness at n = 1–2 are excluded. As shown in Fig. S1 in Supplementary Information (SI), the saturation behavior of magnetic moments at the interfaces is evident as the number of Fe layers increases just beyond the n = 3 and PMA is preferred for all n although it shows an oscillatory behaviour as a function of thickness, analogs to the Fe|MgO films in previous theoretical22,23 and experimental studies24,25. Here and hereafter, we thus refer the results to those in Ta3|Fe3|(MgO)5, whose geometry is illustrated in Fig. 2(a). However, we would like to note that the direct comparison with measurements from the broad ranges of sample stoichiometry and film-thickness requires some cautious, and the further calculations of the effects of strain and E-field on MAE with more geometric patterns, including thicker films of FM and TM layers, should be carried out to provide more insights. From the total energy calculations, the preferred adsorption sites of Fe atoms were atop of O and a hollow site at the Fe|MgO and Ta|Fe interface, respectively. The magnetic moments and interlayer distances at the interface between Fe and O, denoted as dFe–O, and Fe and Ta (dFe–Ta), for a different strain η are shown in Table 1. Hereafter, we refer to zero strain (η = 0) as the experimental lattice constant (2.978 Å) of MgO, while η = −4% corresponds to the lattice constant (2.86 Å) in bulk Fe. We recall here that the in-plane lattice near the Fe|MgO interface in practical is within this range, −4% ≤ η ≤ 026. The in-plane lattice of Ta capping is then enforced to match accordingly for each strain, assuming a few-nanometers-thick TM and FM films. Both the dFe–O and dFe–Ta decrease as η increases from −4% to zero. The magnetic moments of the interface Fe atoms, labeled as Fe(1) at the Fe|MgO and Fe(2) at the Ta|Fe interface (Fig. 2(a)), exhibit a trend similar to the interlayer distances, which is predominantly due to the charge transfer and hybridization effects at the interfaces13. For the unstrained lattice of MgO (η = 0), the Fe(1) (Fe(2)) atoms have an enhanced (reduced) moment of 2.67 (1.50) μB in the presence of MgO (Ta) layers with respect to the center Fe or bulk feature of pristine Fe. The interface Ta atom has a noticeable induced moment (−0.32 μB), antiparallel to the Fe moments.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Side view of atomic structures for Ta|Fe|MgO (left), Fe|MgO without Ta (center), Ta|Fe without MgO layers (right). The larger brown, blue, green, and smaller red balls are Ta, Fe, Mg, and O atoms, respectively. The Fe atoms at the Fe|MgO and Ta|Fe interfaces are labeled by Fe(1) and Fe(2), respectively. (b) Density of states in the minority-spin state of the Ta (topmost), Fe(2) (center), and Fe(1) (bottommost panel) atoms for different strains of η = −4% (black), −2% (red), and zero (blue). The Fermi level is set to zero energy. (c) MAE of Ta|Fe|MgO for η = −4%, −2%, and zero strain. The vertical dashed lines indicate the experimental lattice constants of bulk Fe and MgO, which correspond to η = −4% and zero strain, respectively. (d) Strain-induced changes in MAE, ΔMAE(Δη1/η2) = MAE(η = −2%)–MAE(η = −4%/0), for the individual Fe|MgO (orange) and Ta|Fe (violet area) interfaces. Results of ΔMAE(Δη1/η2) for Ta|Fe|MgO are also shown in dark-gray for comparison.

Table 1. Optimized interlayer distances (Å), and magnetic moments (μB) of Fe(1) at the Fe|MgO and Fe(2) and Ta atoms at the Ta|Fe interface of Ta|Fe|MgO for different strains in the zero electric field.

η a dFe–O dFe–Ta MFe(1) MFe(2) MTa
−4% 2.860 2.21 1.79 2.862 2.146 −0.068
−2% 2.918 2.13 1.51 2.676 1.517 −0.266
0 2.978 2.08 1.45 2.670 1.502 −0.316
Open in a new tab

Strain at the experimental lattice constant (a = 2.987 Å) of MgO is taken as reference. The largest compressive strain with η = −4% considered in this study corresponds to the experimental lattice constant (a = 2.86 Å) of bulk Fe.

These changes associated with the hybridization effect are well manifested in the minority spin density of states (DOS) that is shown in Fig. 2(b). The presences of MgO and Ta layers severely affect the d states of Fe in bulk (See Fig. 4 in ref. 27.); While a large peak appears above the Fermi level in the Fe(1)-DOS, the DOS of the Fe(2) atom are rather dispersive and shifted downward across the Fermi level, which can be inferred as the reflection of the enhanced (reduced) spin exchange-splitting of the Fe(1) (Fe(2)) site through the Fe d–O p (Fe d–Ta d) hybridization. Furthermore, these electronic states near the Fermi level are altered significantly as one shrinks in-plane lattice from η = 0 (blue) to η = −2% (red) to η = −4% (black line in Fig. 2(b)). In particular, the coincidence of simultaneous shifts of Fe(2)- and Ta-DOS towards the high energy level is prominent. As a consequence, the interfacial Fe (Ta) moments increase (decreases) as strain increases, and tend to achieve their free-standing surface magnetism (nearly 3 μB for Fe and zero for Ta atom) at η = −4%. The changes of the fully occupied majority spin states under different strains are not significant, so they are not seriously considered in the present study.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Distribution of MAE over k-space, MAE(k), for η = −4%, −2%, and zero strain (left to right). Blue/dark and yellow/light areas represent negative and positive MAE(k), respectively. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the k-point line that can represent the strain-induced changes of total MAE. (c) MAE(k) difference along 2/5(ΓX)–2/5(XM) between at η = −4% and η = −2% (dashed), and between at η = 0 and η = −2% (solid). Minority-spin band structures along the 2/5(ΓX)–2/5(XM) line for (c) η = −4%, (d) η = −2%, and (e) zero strain. The dxy, dxz, dyz, dz2, and dx2−y2 orbital characters of Ta atom at the Ta|Fe interface are denoted in black, orange, green, red, and blue, respectively. The symbol size represents the weight of the d orbitals. The Fermi level is set to zero energy.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Electric-field dependence of MAE for (a) η = −4%, (b) η = −2%, and (c) zero strain. The data points with a circle symbol are fitted by a linear in all panels. The value of the electric field in the horizontal axis is that in MgO. Electric-field-induced MAE(k), ΔMAE(k) = MAE(±E, k) – MAE(0, k), for negative (left) and positive field (right) for (d) η = −4%, (e) η = −2%, and (f) zero strain. Symbols (− and +) denote the direction of the electric field. For each strain, ΔMAE(±E, k) along the particular k-point line, which has the largest contribution to MAE, as indicated by the horizontal dashed line, is detailed in the bottom panels of (d–f) for negative (blue) and positive electric-field (red).

In Fig. 2(c), the strain dependence of the zero-field MAE of Ta|Fe|MgO is shown for η = −4% to zero. While PMA is preserved for all η considered (which is not the case for Ta|CoFe|MgO28), the η = −2%, which is the compressive (tensile) strain relative to the MgO (Fe) lattice, is found to have a greatly enhanced MAE of 2.5 erg/cm2. This value is notably larger than that (about 0.5 erg/cm2) found in strained Ta|CoFe|MgO with η = −2%28, which along with the robust PMA under different strains is worth noting from a practical viewpoint to prevent a stable magnetization axis from thermal fluctuations3. The contribution of two interfaces to MAE is also analyzed from the individual systems of Fe|MgO without Ta (left in Fig. 2(a)) and Ta|Fe without MgO layers (middle in Fig. 2(a)). To see the relative contribution of interfaces, the half of MAE value of the three atomic layers of free-standing Fe(001) is subtracted from the total MAE for each interface. The strain-induced enhancement of MAE, ΔMAE(Δη1/η2) = MAE(η = −2%) – MAE(η = −4%/0), is presented in Fig. 2(d) for Fe|MgO (orange), Ta|Fe (violet), and Ta|Fe|MgO (dark gray). Notably, both the ΔMAE(Δη1) and ΔMAE(Δη2) of the Ta|Fe interface exhibit a trend similar or comparable in the magnitude of MAE to those for Ta|Fe|MgO, but Fe|MgO does not. This indicates that the dominant contribution to the variation of MAE value under strain comes mainly from the Ta|Fe interface, leading to the lambda (Λ)-shape trend shown in Fig. 2(c). The previous ab initio calculations have already shown that the large changes of MAE in magnetic metals alloyed or capped with 4d and 5d elements are the results of the larger SOC of 4d and 5d orbitals than the 3d elements13,29,30,31. On the other hand, the intrinsic nature of the PMA of Ta|Fe|MgO can be attributed to the interface effects at the Fe|MgO: Fe d–O p hybridization2,4,16,17 and perfect epitaxy of Fe films on the MgO surface23. Furthermore, the strain affects not only the magnitude of MAE but also the charge transfer considerably at the Ta|Fe interface rather than at the Fe|MgO, which is the result of the interfacial charge screening effects due to the internal E-field across the interface32. Indeed, this can be modulated via strain, and such strain-induced modification of the charge transfer evolves in changes of the SOC bands near the Fermi level, which will be correlated with MAE in the forthcoming discussion.

To get more insights, we further decompose MAE on k-space, MAE(k), over a two-dimensional (2D) Brillouin zone (BZ) in Fig. 3(a) for η = −4%, −2%, and zero (from left to right), where the blue/dark (yellow/light) area represents negative (positive) MAE(k). The dominant contribution that yields the larger PMA at η = −2%, with respect to those for η = −4% and zero strains, is mainly along the BZ line between 2/5(ΓX) and 2/5(XM), as indicated by the dashed-line in Fig. 3(a). For better visualization, ΔMAE(k, Δη1) and ΔMAE(k, Δη2), as defined before, along 2/5(ΓX)–2/5(XM) are also plotted in Fig. 3(b). The corresponding band structures in the spin-down state of the Ta atom at the Ta|Fe interface are shown in Fig. 3(c,d,e) for η = −4%, −2%, and zero strain, respectively. For the spin-channel contributions to the MAE, we follow a recipe by the previous full-potential calculations on TM|Fe (TM = Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, and Pt) systems to which the spin down-down (↓↓) channel contributes dominantly over the other spin channels, spin up-down ↑↓ and up-up ↑↑13. We decompose the Eq. (1) into nonvanishing matrix elements with the SOC eigenvalue states that are predominant near the Fermi level in the ↓↓-component, where the SOC constant is omitted, as

graphic file with name srep32742-m2.jpg

where, the positive and negative contributions to MAE are determined by lz and lx operators, respectively20.

The band analyses will be concentrated on particular k-points, at and around 2/5(ΓX), in which the dominant peak contributions of ΔMAE(k, Δη1/η2) (Fig. 3(b)) and the eigenvalue states near the Fermi level (Fig. 3(d)) are prominent. As η increases from −4% to zero, the following two features become notable: (1) the filled dxy and dxz (empty dyz) bands shifts upward (downward) above (towards) the Fermi level, (2) the partially filled dx2−y2 band becomes fully occupied and appears just below the Fermi level at η = −2% and moves further away from the Fermi level when η = 0. For η = −4% at 2/5(ΓX), the hybridized dxy and dxz bands coexist below and above the Fermi level, of which the occupied dxz band also couples with the dyz at around 0.5 eV. These couplings give rise to the competition of SOC states between the second positive and third negative terms in Eq. (2). When η = −2%, however, substantial rearrangements of occupied and unoccupied bands near the Fermi level, as (1) and (2), provide additional positive contributions to the first and second terms in Eq. (2), through Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The former and latter positive contributions are reduced significantly at η = 0 because of the absence of filled dxz band and the enlarged energy difference in the denominator of the second term in Eq. (2), respectively. To support the aforementioned atomic and electronic origin of PMA changes under strain, we also analyze the energy- and k-resolved band distribution of orbital characters of the interface Fe(1) and Fe(2) atoms (See the SI). In contrast to the Ta and Fe(2) at the TM|FM interface, there are no appreciable coupling states that can give a contribution to positive ΔMAE(Δη1/η2) at 2/5(ΓX) for the Fe(1) atom at the Fe|MgO interface. Only the SOC pairs between the states that yields the negative contribution by Inline graphic exist around 2/5(ΓX) at η = −2%, as shown in Fig. S2 in the SI.

We now explore the effects of E-field and strain on VPMA. The external E-field is oriented normal to the in-plane lattice, where the upward direction pointing toward the Fe|MgO interface represents positive the E-field, as depicted in Fig. 1. The dipole correction was taken into account to eliminate an artificial field across the slab imposed by the periodic boundary condition. The variation of the interfacial Fe(1), Fe(2), and Ta site magnetism as a function of E-field is presented in Fig. S3 in the SI for η = −4%, −2%, and zero strain. Here, we refer the effective E-field to that in MgO, which would be more practical than the local fields at the interface, defined as E-field(MgO) = E-field(vac)/ε, where E-field(vac) is an external E-field in vacuum and ε is the dielectric constant of MgO. The calculated (experimental) ε are about 20, 12.5, and 10 (9.8) for η = −4%, −2%, and zero, respectively28,33. From the slope of VPMA with respect to the E-field in MgO, one can determine the ME coefficient by VPMA/E-field(MgO). In addition to the modification of E-fields with strain, the external E-field is also expected to decay at each interface due to the different work functions between the two materials in the stacked layers.

Figure 4(a–c) show the E-field dependence of MAE of Ta|Fe|MgO for η = −4%, −2%, and zero strain, respectively. Being in the opposite trend to the E-field dependence of Ta magnetism except for η = −4% (Fig. S3 in the SI), distinctly different behaviours of VPMA are demonstrated for different strains. The E-field dependence of VPMA at η = −4% exhibits an asymmetric V-shape trend with a minimum at −0.25 V/nm similar to the magnetism, where ME coefficients of about –1210 and 600 fJV−1m−1 are calculated for E-field <0 and E-field >0, respectively. On the other hand, at η = −2% the negative field reduces MAE monotonically while MAE increases with the positive field up to 0.4 V/nm, and then sharply decreases with further increases in field (Fig. 4(b)). This leads to the Λ-shaped VPMA with 169 (−746) fJV−1m−1 for the negative (positive) field, which is opposite that for η = −4%. As η further goes to zero, V-shaped VPMA reappears with a local minimum at the negative field, as in η = −4%. The smaller dielectric constant (10) of MgO for the zero strain causes the reduction of the ME coefficient, −270 (449) fJV−1m−1 when E-field <0 (E-field > 0). Such different behaviours of VPMA and critical fields corresponding to the maximum and minimum MAE values can be ascribed to the interplay between the internal and external E-fields through Rashba splitting of the band structure. A recent study reported that the Rashba SOC interaction, which has contributions from both the internal and external E-fields, can give an important contribution to the MAE with a nonlinear quadratic form32. This indicates that the strain- (internal E-field) and external E-field-induced shifts of the d orbitals in energy levels, as will be clarified later, lead to the aforementioned results. Note that these ME constants are two to three times of the corresponding values found in Ta|CoFe|MgO28, and, in general, are larger than the ~200 fJV−1m−1 required to achieve a switching bit energy below 1 fJ6.

The calculated results suggest that the VPMA and ME coefficient can be sensitively controlled by engineering the in-plane lattice. We also emphasize here that the strain effect might be the main cause of experimental deviations in the VPMA and ME coefficient, as mentioned previously7,8,9,10,18. For instance, V|Fe and MgO|FeB interfaces, which differ in the interface structure as well as the capping layers, exhibit the opposite V- and Λ-shaped VPMA but also ME coefficients in an order of discrepancy9,10. In particular, with η = −4% we reproduce the experimental magnetoelectric coefficient of −1150 ± 50 fJV−1m−1 found in V|Fe|MgO, which was attributed to the E-field-induced charge screening at the interfaces9. In this junction, a thinner MgO layer (1.2 nm) is sandwiched by 0.7- and 5-nm-thick Fe layers9, in which the in-plane lattice of MgO is most likely enforced to adjust to that of Fe during epitaxial growth. More recently, an importance of epitaxial strain on enhancement of VPMA was revealed in ferromagnetic resonance measurements on Ta|CoFeB|MgO films18.

To observe the contribution of the interface layers to the variation of VPMA under the E-field, we calculate the MAE as a function of the E-field for the individual Ta|Fe and Fe|MgO interfaces at η = −4% (Fig. S4 in the SI). As seen in Fig. S4(a), the Ta|Fe interface exhibits the V-shape E-field dependence of MAE similar to that (Fig. 4(a)) of Ta|Fe|MgO, even though the magnitude of MAE is more and less zero or negative under the E-field. In contrast, the VPMA is rather insensitive in the presence of the E-field for the Fe|MgO interface. It was reported in experiments that the presence of MgO is necessary for the PMA in Ta|CoFeB|MgO from the fact that Ta|CoFeB|Ta without MgO layers exhibit in-plane magnetization. The weak or negative MAE at the Ta|Fe interface can be explained by the 3d–5d hybridization and the band-filling effects, which were discussed in detail in refs 13 and 28. As mentioned before, the PMA at the Fe|MgO interface is due to the Fe d–O p hybridization2,4,16,17 and perfect epitaxy of Fe films on the MgO surface23. Thus, although the Fe|MgO interface is responsible for determining the PMA2,4,16,17,23, the variation of MAE under the E-field in Ta|Fe|MgO is predominantly contributed by the Ta|Fe interface (Fig. S4(b) in the SI)15.

In order to elucidate the different trends of VPMA and ME coefficients under strain, the distribution of the E-field-induced change of MAE(k), ΔMAE(k) = MAE( ± E,k) – MAE(0,k), over full BZ is shown in Fig. 4(d–f) for η = −4%, −2%, and zero, respectively. The +E and –E denote the direction of the E-field (i.e., E-field >0 and E-field < 0). The magnitudes of ±E are ±1, ±1.25, and ±1.5 V/nm for η = −4%, −2%, and zero, respectively. For each η, we will focus on the particular ΔMAE(k) region that provides a dominant contrition to VPMA, as shown in the bottom panels in Fig. 4(d–f): around 1/4(XM) along 1/4(ΓX)–1/4(XM) for η = −4%; around 1/3(ΓX) along 1/3(ΓX)–1/3(XM) for η = −2%; and around 3/5(ΓX) along the 3/5(ΓX)–3/5(XM) line for zero strain. We also plot the corresponding zero-field band structure of orbital characters of the interface Ta in Fig. 5(a–c), and the shifts under E-field <0 (blue solid line) and E-field <0 (red solid line) in Fig. 5(d–f) for η = −4%, −2%, and zero, respectively. At η = −4%, the downward (upward) shift of the filled dyz (unfilled dx2−y2) under E-field <0 (E-field >0) around 1/4(XM) reduces negative contribution Inline graphic in MAE, resulting in the positive peaks in Fig. 4(d). The other sharp positive peak above 1/4(ΓX) when E-field <0 is ascribed to the shift of the empty dx2−y2 band towards the Fermi level, which couples with the occupied dxy just below the Fermi level. This positive ΔMAE(−E, k) through Inline graphic, which is not present in E-field >0, leads to the larger VPMA slope when the E-field <0 (−1210 fJV−1m−1) in Fig. 4(a).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Minority-spin band structures along the particular k-point line shown in Fig. 4(d–f) for (a) η = −4%, (b) η = −2%, and (c) zero strain. dxy, dxz, dyz, dz2, and dx2−y2 orbital characters of Ta atom at the Ta|Fe interface are denoted in black, orange, green, red, and blue, respectively. The symbol size represents the weight of the d orbitals. Electric-field-induced shifts of band structures for negative (blue) and positive electric-field (red) are shown for (d) η = −4%, (e) η = −2%, and (f) zero strain. For comparison, zero field band structures are also shown in the dotted black lines. The Fermi level is set to zero energy.

At η = −2%, the zero-field negative contribution by Inline graphic around 1/3(ΓX) (Fig. 5(b)) is significantly increased in the presence of the E-fields since the downward (upward) shift of empty dxz (filled dxy) band enhances the negative third term of Eq. (2), as shown in Fig. 5(e). From this, the negative peaks of ΔMAE(k) at 1/3(ΓX) are well addressed in Fig. 4(e), thereby ΔMAE(k) <0 for E-field <0 and >0. On the other hand, at η = 0 the zero-field positive MAE should be partially contributed by the SOC pair states between the dxz and dyz bands across the Fermi level at 3/5(ΓX) (Fig. 5(c)). Under the fields, as seen in Fig. 5(e), the ΔMAE(±E, k) around 3/5(ΓX) should increase due to the reduced energy difference between the dxz and dyz states in the denominator of the first term in Eq. (2).

Discussion

Through the first-principles electronic structure calculations, we identify a synergistic effect of epitaxial strain on PMA and its E-field dependence of VPMA in Ta|Fe|MgO multilayers. By tuning an in-plane strain, we find a substantially large magnetoelectric coefficient, in an order up to 1000 fJV−1m−1. We further provide the physical insights on the origin of different behaviors of V- and Λ-shaped VPMA, where the large SOC of the magnetically-induced 5d Ta atoms through the strong Ta 5d–Fe 3d hybridization at the TM|FM interface plays an important role although the Fe 3d–O 2p hybridization at the Fe|MgO interface is partly responsible in determining the PMA of Ta|Fe|MgO as addressed previously. In the context of spintronics applications, the present study suggests that strain engineering would be a highly desirable route to achieve the large voltage-induced modulation of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy required in magnetoelectric memory devices.

Methods

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the projector augmented wave (PAW) pseudopotential method34, as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)35. Exchange and correlation interactions between electrons were described with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) formulated by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE)36. Energy cutoff 500 eV and Monkhorst-Pack k-mesh of 15 × 15 × 1 were imposed for the ionic relaxation, where forces acting on atoms were less than 10−2 eV/Å. The SOC term is included by using the second-variation method employing the scalar-relativistic eigenfunctions of the valence states37. MAE is calculated from the total energy difference when the magnetization directions are on the xy-plane (E⁄⁄) and along the z-axis (E⊥), MAE = (1/a)2 (E⁄⁄–E⊥), where a is the in-plane lattice constant, so that positive MAE stands for the preferable direction of magnetization normal to the film plane (i.e., PMA). A dense k-point of 31 × 31 × 1 was used for MAE calculations, which was sufficient to get reliable results.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Odkhuu, D. Giant strain control of magnetoelectric effect in Ta|Fe|MgO. Sci. Rep. 6, 32742; doi: 10.1038/srep32742 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep32742-s1.pdf (705.5KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Author Contributions D.O. performed the calculations and prepared the manuscript.

References

  1. Chappert C., Fert A. & Dau F. N. V. The emergence of spin electronics in data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 813 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ikeda S. et al. A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction. Nat. Mater. 9, 721 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kent A. D. Spintronics: Perpendicular all the way. Nat. Mater. 9, 699 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang W.-G., Li M., Hageman S. & Chien C. L. Electric-field-assisted switching in magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 11, 64 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shiota Y. et al. Induction of coherent magnetization switching in a few atomic layers of FeCo using voltage pulses. Nat. Mater. 11, 39 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang K. L., Alzate J. G. & Amiri P. K. Low-power non-volatile spintronic memory: STTRAM and beyond. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46, 074003 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  7. Endo M., Kanai S., Ikeda S., Matsukura F. & Ohno H. Electric-field effects on thickness dependent magnetic anisotropy of sputtered MgO/Co40Fe40B20/Ta structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 212503 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. Nozaki T., Shiota Y., Shiraishi M., Shinjo T. & Suzuki Y. Voltage-induced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy change in magnetic tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 022506 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. Rajanikanth A., Hauet T., Montaigne F., Mangin S. & Andrieu S. Magnetic anisotropy modified by electric field in V/Fe/MgO(001)/Fe epitaxial magnetic tunnel junction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 062402 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. Nozaki T. et al. Voltage-induced magnetic anisotropy changes in an ultrathin FeB layer sandwiched between two MgO layers. Appl. Phys. Express 6, 073005 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Worledge D. C. et al. Spin torque switching of perpendicular Ta/CoFeB/MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 022501 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng T.-I., Cheng C.-W. & Chern G. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy induced by a cap layer in ultrathin MgO/CoFeB/Nb. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 033910 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. Odkhuu D., Rhim S. H., Park N. & Hong S. Extremely large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of an Fe(001) surface capped by 5d transition metal monolayers: A density functional study. Phys. Rev. B 88, 184405 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. Peng S. et al. Origin of interfacial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Mgo/CoFe/metallic capping layer structures. Sci. Rep. 5, 18173 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guan X. W. et al. Effect of metal-to-metal interface states on the electric-field modified magnetic anisotropy in MgO/Fe/non-magnetic metal. J. Appl. Phys. 119, 133905 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang H. X. et al. First-principles investigation of the very large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at Fe/MgO and Co/MgO interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 84, 054401 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  17. Niranjan M. K., Duan C.-G., Jaswal S. S. & Tsymbal E. Y. Electric field effect on magnetization at the Fe/MgO(001) interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 222504 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  18. Yu G. et al. Strain-induced modulation of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Ta/CoFeB/MgO structures investigated by ferromagnetic resonance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 072402 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. Odkhuu D., Rhim S. H., Park N., Nakamura K. & Hong S. C. Jahn-teller driven perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy in metastable ruthenium. Phys. Rev. B 91, 014437 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang D. S., Wu R. & Freeman A. J. First-principles theory of surface magnetocrystalline anisotropy and the diatomic-pair model. Phys. Rev. B 47, 14932 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yamamoto H. et al. Dependence of Magnetic Anisotropy in Co20Fe60B20 Free Layers on Capping Layers in MgO-Based Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with In-Plane Easy Axis. Appl. Phys. Express 5, 053002 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. Hallal A., Yang H. X., Dieny B. & Chshiev M. Anatomy of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Fe/MgO magnetic tunnel junctions: First-principles insight. Phys. Rev. B 88, 184423 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  23. Odkhuu D., Yun W. S., Rhim S. & Hong S. C. Theory of perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy in Fe/MgO (001). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 414, 126 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  24. Boubeta C. M. et al. Coverage effects on the magnetism of Fe/MgO(001) ultrathin films, Phys. Rev. B 71, 014407 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhan Q. F. et al. Magnetic anisotropies of epitaxial Fe/MgO(001) films with varying thickness and grown under different conditions, New J. Phys. 11 063003 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  26. Yuasa S., Nagahama T., Fukushima A., Suzuki Y. & Ando K. Giant room–temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 3, 868 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Odkhuu D., Yun W. S. & Hong S. C. Magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy and spin polarization of Fe3Si in bulk and on Si(001) and Si(111) substrates. Thin Solid Films 519, 8218 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. Ong P. V. et al. Giant voltage modulation of magnetic anisotropy in strained heavy metal/magnet/insulator heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 92, 020407 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. Odkhuu D., Yun W. S., Rhim S. H. & Hong S. C. Engineering of magnetostriction in Fe3Pt1−xIrx by controlling the Ir concentration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 152502 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. Odkhuu D., Magnetization reversal of giant perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at the magnetic-phase transition in FeRh films on MgO. Phys. Phys. Rev. B. 93, 064412 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  31. Odkhuu D. Giant perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of an individual atom on two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B. 94, 060403 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  32. Barnes S. E., Ieda J. & Maekawa S. Rashba spin-orbit anisotropy and the electric field control of magnetism. Sci. Rep. 4, 4105 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Krupka J., Geyer R. G., Kuhn M. & Hinken J. H. Dielectric properties of single crystals of Al2O3, LaAlO3, NdGaO3, SrTiO3, and MgO at cryogenic temperatures. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 42, 1886 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  34. Blochl P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kresse G. & Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Perdew J., Burke K. & Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Koelling D. D. & Harmon B. N. A technique for relativistic spin-polarised calculations. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 10, 3107 (1977). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep32742-s1.pdf (705.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES