Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016 May 25;55(29):8435–8439. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603424

Direct Access to β-Fluorinated Aldehydes via Nitrite-Modified Wacker Oxidation

Crystal K Chu 1, Daniel T Ziegler 1, Brian Carr 1, Zachary K Wickens 1, Robert H Grubbs 1,
PMCID: PMC5013664  NIHMSID: NIHMS791533  PMID: 27225538

Abstract

An aldehyde-selective Wacker-type oxidation of allylic fluorides employing a nitrite catalyst is described. The method represents a direct route to prepare β-fluorinated aldehydes. Allylic fluorides bearing a variety of functional groups are transformed in high yield and very high regioselectivity. Additionally, crude aldehyde products serve as versatile intermediates, enabling access to a diverse array of fluorinated building blocks. Preliminary mechanistic investigations suggest that inductive effects have a strong influence on the rate and regioselectivity of oxidation.

Keywords: alkenes, oxidation, fluorine, aldehydes, regioselectivity

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms791533f6.jpg

The aldehyde-selective Wacker-type oxidation of allylic fluorides was accomplished using catalytic nitrite, providing a direct route to prepare β-fluorinated aldehydes. Allylic fluorides bearing a variety of functional groups are transformed in high yield and regioselectivity. Preliminary mechanistic investigations suggest that inductive effects have a strong influence on the rate and regioselectivity of oxidation.


The demand for organofluorine compounds is rapidly growing as a result of their prevalence in the pharmaceutical,[1] agrochemical,[2] and materials[3] industries. Due to a low abundance of fluorinated chemical feedstocks,[4] the development of efficient routes toward organofluorine building blocks has been recognized as an important challenge in the synthetic community.[5] Traditional fluorination protocols typically employ harsh reagents such as diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST), restricting their tolerance of functional groups. Consequently, careful selection of an appropriate fluorinating agent must often be performed on a case-by-case basis.[6]

Significant progress has been made toward mild, catalytic alkyl fluorination, with much of this work dedicated to installing fluorine atoms adjacent to π systems (Scheme 1A).[7] α-Fluorination of carbonyl compounds is achieved efficiently via organo- and transition-metal catalysis.[8] Allylic fluorides can also be readily prepared by regio- and enantioselective methods.[7a–d, f,h] For example, Ir-catalyzed allylic substitution[7d,h] and Pd-catalyzed C–H fluorination[7f] methods can serve as convenient approaches to allylic fluorides.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Strategies toward alkylfluorine compounds.

Despite the depth of research dedicated to α-fluorination of activated π systems, catalytic installation of fluorine β to functional groups remains a major challenge.[9] One promising strategy enables the syntheses of β- and γ- fluorinated ketones via catalytic ring opening of strained cyclopropanols and cyclobutanols, respectively.[10] Alternative methods amenable to producing β-fluorinated carbonyl compounds have been reported,[11] but a general solution employing simple starting materials has yet to be developed. Herein, we report a catalytic approach to directly access β-fluorinated aldehydes from readily accessible allylic fluorides (Scheme 1B).

The Wacker reaction is a powerful method[12] for the oxidation of olefins that typically favors Markovnikov selectivity.[13] However, in the presence of proximal functional groups, regioselectivity of oxidation can be difficult to rationally predict.[14] In our recent study of a dicationic Pd-catalyzed Wacker-type oxidation of internal olefins,[15] inductively withdrawing trifluoromethyl groups were found to substantially enhance selectivity for distal oxidation.[16] In fact, even the oxidation of a terminal olefin, 4,4,4-trifluoro-1-butene, occurred with modest anti-Markovnikov selectivity (3:1 aldehyde/ketone). We therefore reasoned that modified Wacker conditions, combined with the inductive influence of allylic fluorides, could be employed as a general strategy for the synthesis of β-fluorinated aldehydes under mild conditions.

The model allylic fluoride A was initially subjected to a range of Wacker-type oxidation conditions toward optimization of aldehyde selectivity.[17] Traditional Tsuji-Wacker conditions proved poorly suited for oxidation of the electron deficient allylic fluoride, resulting in defluorination and no aldehyde selectivity (Figure 1a). When subjected to our previously reported dicationic palladium system, this substrate was oxidized in moderate yield with preference for the aldehyde (3:1 aldehyde/ketone; Figure 1b), revealing some innate aldehyde selectivity of the substrate.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of oxidation conditions with a model substrate. [a] Selectivity (aldehyde/ketone) determined by 1H NMR analysis. [b] Oxidation yield (aldehyde + ketone) determined by 1H NMR analysis versus an internal standard. Only fluorinated products included. (See Table 1 for opt. conditions).

To emphasize this effect, we next explored nitrite ligands[18] and exogenous nitrite co-catalysts, utilized by Feringa and our own group, respectively, for the catalyst-controlled oxidation of terminal olefins to aldehydes. When A was subjected to Feringa’s conditions, catalyzed by [PdNO2Cl(MeCN)2],[19] high aldehyde selectivity was observed (18:1 aldehyde/ketone), albeit in poor yield (Figure 1c). Our group recently developed a Wacker system that employs an exogenous nitrite catalyst in a tBuOH/MeNO2 solvent system, which oxidizes unbiased terminal olefins with anti-Markovnikov selectivity.[20] This nitrite co-catalyzed system oxidized allylic fluoride A in moderate yield and high selectivity (26:1 aldehyde/ketone; Figure 1d). Further optimization, involving exclusion of water from the reaction system, increased nitromethane concentration, and even a reduction in catalyst loading, resulted in very high selectivity for aldehyde formation (36:1 aldehyde/ketone) in high yield (77%; Figure 1e). Since the use of tBuOH has been established as a strategy to enhance aldehyde selectivity in Wacker-type oxidations,[21,22] the importance of the nitrite catalyst and nitromethane as a cosolvent was assessed. Elimination of these components from the optimized conditions led to diminished aldehyde selectivity (8:1 aldehyde/ketone) and formation of defluorination products (Figure 1f).[23]

With optimized conditions in hand, we next explored the reaction scope, and found the method to be well suited for regioselective oxidation of allylic fluorides bearing a variety of functional groups.[24] Branched allylic fluorides without added bias were oxidized to the corresponding β-fluorinated aldehydes in high yield and ≥20:1 selectivity, with an ester and alkyl chloride being well tolerated (Table 1, entries 1,2, 6, and 7). High aldehyde selectivities were maintained for allylic fluorides bearing an additional directing group. Olefins with phenyl and benzyl ethers, benzoate, and phthalimide branches were oxidized to the corresponding aldehydes with only trace levels of ketone detected (entries 3, 4, 5, and 8, respectively). When comparing previous nitrite-modified Wacker oxidations of functionalized olefins, fluoride has shown to be an exceptionally potent directing group.

Table 1.

Nitrite-modified Wacker oxidations of allylic fluorides: substrate scope.

graphic file with name nihms791533t1.jpg

entry substrate yield[a] selectivity[b]
1 graphic file with name nihms791533t2.jpg 82 ≥20:1
2 graphic file with name nihms791533t3.jpg 87 ≥20:1
3 graphic file with name nihms791533t4.jpg 94 ≥20:1
4 graphic file with name nihms791533t5.jpg 93 ≥20:1
5 graphic file with name nihms791533t6.jpg 93 ≥20:1
6 graphic file with name nihms791533t7.jpg 72 ≥20:1
7 graphic file with name nihms791533t8.jpg 81[c] ≥20:1
8 graphic file with name nihms791533t9.jpg 77 ≥20:1
[a]

Yield of purified product following NaBH4 reduction.

[b]

Selectivity (aldehyde:ketone) determined by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture prior to reduction.

[c]

Yield of aldehyde determined by 1H NMR analysis versus an internal standard.

Despite the relative instability of β-fluorinated aldehydes, the high purity of the crude products allows for direct transformation to a variety of organofluorine compounds. Reaction with Oxone furnished the β-fluorinated carboxylic acid 1 in excellent yield (Scheme 2a). Wittig olefination and protection of the carbonyl were achieved in synthetically useful yields in spite of potential base or acid lability of the fluoride (Scheme 2b, d). The aldehyde was reduced nearly quantitatively to γ-fluorinated alcohol 3 (Scheme 2c). Furthermore, nucleophilic addition to aldehydes provides access to a range of new fluorinated building blocks, demonstrated by the addition of allylB(pin) to produce homoallylic alcohol 5 (Scheme 2e). Overall, the efficient preparation of β-fluorinated aldehydes via Wacker-type oxidation serves as a unique synthetic handle to produce diverse fluorinated molecules.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Derivatization of a β-fluorinated aldehyde crude product. All derivatizations performed using crude Wacker oxidation product. Yields reported over 2 steps. (a) Oxone, DMF. (b) MePPh3Br, nBuLi, THF. (c) NaBH4, DCM/EtOH. (d) pTsOH, ethylene glycol, mol. sieves. (e) AllylB(pin), DCM.

In order to investigate how our method may be used to generate stereodefined organofluorines, we were interested in the aldehyde-selective oxidation of enantioenriched allylic fluoride 6.[7h] Under the optimal reaction conditions, oxidation occurred without erosion of enantiopurity,[25] allowing for the isolation of enantioenriched fluorinated product 7 in good yield and ee (Equation 1). This result suggests that Pd-catalyzed olefin isomerization does not occur on the time scale of oxidation to the aldehyde product.

graphic file with name nihms791533f7.jpg (1)

Having demonstrated the synthetic utility of the transformation, we sought to gain insight into the role of the fluoride in influencing regioselectivity and reactivity. To this end, a study of the distance dependence of regioselectivity on fluoride proximity was conducted. Three alkyl fluoride isomers were synthesized with systematic variation of the distance between fluoride and olefin. The oxidations of these compounds under our standard conditions were then compared along with that of 1-decene (Figure 2). The high aldehyde selectivity (96%) in the case of the allylic fluoride (n = 0) depreciates as n increases. A strong preference for oxidation to the aldehyde is maintained in the reaction of a homoallylic fluoride (n = 1), suggesting that this method can provide a convenient route to γ-fluorinated aldehydes. However, aldehyde selectivity diminishes for the analogue fluorinated in a more distal position (n = 2), and poor regioselectivity is observed in the oxidation of the unbiased olefin 1-decene (58%).[26] The gradual loss in selectivity as fluoride substitution is placed further from the olefin is consistent with a key inductive effect that enhances regioselectivity under these nitrite-modified Wacker conditions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Influence of fluoride proximity on regioselectivity of oxidation. [a] Selectivity (aldehyde/total oxidation yield) determined by 1H NMR analysis.

The relative rates of conversion of a fluorinated and non-fluorinated olefin were studied in order to further elucidate the effect of fluoride substitution (Figure 3). Individual rate comparisons of the two compounds show that the more electron deficient fluorinated olefin reacts at an accelerated rate relative to the unfunctionalized olefin (Figure 3A). However, when the two olefins were oxidized in competition in a 1:1 ratio, the non-fluorinated olefin was consumed 2.3 times faster than the allylic fluoride, potentially due to saturation of the catalyst with non-fluorinated olefin (Figure 3B). This inversion of relative reactivity, which results from a decrease in the rate of conversion of the fluorinated olefin rather than an increase in the rate of conversion of the non-fluorinated olefin, suggests that stronger olefin coordination does not inherently lead to accelerated rate of oxidation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Individual rate and competition experiments performed to measure relative rates of conversion.

In summary, we have developed a practical synthesis of β-fluorinated aldehydes from readily accessible allylic fluorides. This method represents a rare example of catalysis to produce β-fluorinated carbonyl compounds under procedurally simple conditions. Direct transformation of crude aldehyde products demonstrates the versatility of β-fluorinated aldehyde building blocks. Preliminary mechanistic studies are consistent with inductive effects having a significant influence on both the regioselectivity and rate of oxidation and will facilitate further study of this new catalytic system.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. David VanderVelde for NMR assistance and Dr. Peter Dornan for helpful discussions. We acknowledge KFUPM and ONR for financial support and the NIH NIGMS (F32GM116357) for a fellowship to D. Z.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.

References

  • 1.For reviews of fluorine in the pharmaceutical industry and the biological properties of fluorine-containing compounds, see: Müller K, Faeh C, Diederich F. Science. 2007;317:1881–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.1131943. Purser S, Moore PR, Swallow S, Gouverneur V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:320–330. doi: 10.1039/b610213c. Kirk KL. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008;12:305–321. O’Hagan D. J Fluorine Chem. 2010;131:1071–1081. Wang J, Sánchez-Roselló M, Aceña JL, del Pozo C, Sorochinsky AE, Fustero S, Soloshonok VA, Liu H. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:2432–2506. doi: 10.1021/cr4002879.
  • 2.For an introduction to fluorine in agrochemicals, see: Jeschke P. Chem Bio Chem. 2004;5:570–589. Jeschke P. Modern Methods in Crop Protection Research. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2012. pp. 73–128. Fujiwara T, O’Hagan D. J Fluorine Chem. 2014;167:16–29.
  • 3.For an introduction to fluorinated compounds in materials chemistry, see: Berger R, Resnati G, Metrangolo P, Weber E, Hulliger J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:3496–3508. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00221f.
  • 4.For a review on the sustainability of organofluorine chemistry, see: Harsanyi A, Sandford G. Green Chem. 2015;17:2081–2086.
  • 5.For reviews of modern methods in organofluorine chemistry, see: Shimizu M, Hiyama T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:214–231. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460441. Furuya T, Kamlet AS, Ritter T. Nature. 2011;473:470–477. doi: 10.1038/nature10108. Liang T, Neumann CN, Ritter T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:8214–8264. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206566. Campbell MG, Ritter T. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:612–633. doi: 10.1021/cr500366b. Yang X, Wu T, Phipps RJ, Toste FD. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:826–870. doi: 10.1021/cr500277b.
  • 6.Singh RP, Shreeve JM. Synthesis. 2002;17:2561–2578. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.For selected examples of benzylic and allylic fluorination, see: Thibaudeau S, Gouverneur V. Org. Lett. 2003;5:4891–4893. doi: 10.1021/ol035991a. Ishimaru T, Shibata N, Horikawa T, Yasuda N, Nakamura S, Toru T, Shiro M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:4157–4161. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800717. Katcher MH, Sha A, Doyle AG. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:15902–15905. doi: 10.1021/ja206960k. Topczewski JJ, Tewson TJ, Nguyen HM. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:19318–19321. doi: 10.1021/ja2087213. McMurtrey KB, Racowski JM, Sanford MS. Org. Lett. 2012;14:4094–4097. doi: 10.1021/ol301739f. Braun M-G, Doyle AG. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:12990–12993. doi: 10.1021/ja407223g. Huang X, Liu W, Ren H, Neelamegam R, Hooker JM, Groves JT. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:6842–6845. doi: 10.1021/ja5039819. Zhang Q, Stockdale DP, Mixdorf JC, Topczewski JJ, Nguyen HM. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:11912–11915. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b07492.
  • 8.For reviews on catalytic α-fluorination of carbonyl compounds, see: Mukherjee S, Yang JW, Hoffman S, List B. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:5471–5569. doi: 10.1021/cr0684016. Lectard S, Hamashima Y, Sodeoka M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010;352:2708–2732.
  • 9.For a review on distal fluorination of ketones, see: Fan X, Zhao H, Zhu C. Acta Chim. Sinica. 2015;73:979–983.
  • 10.For examples, see: Zhao H, Fan X, Yu J, Zhu C. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:3490–3493. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00939. Bloom S, Bume DD, Pitts CR, Lectka T. Chem. Eur. J. 2015;21:8060–8063. doi: 10.1002/chem.201501081. Ren S, Feng C, Loh T-P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015;13:5105–5109. doi: 10.1039/c5ob00632e. Ishida N, Okumura S, Nakanishi Y, Murakami M. Chem. Lett. 2015;44:821–823.
  • 11.For selected examples of the synthesis of β-fluorinated carbonyl compounds, see: Bloom S, Sharber SA, Holl MG, Knippel JL, Lectka T. J Org. Chem. 2013;78:11082–11086. doi: 10.1021/jo401796g. Kee CW, Chin KF, Wong MW, Tan C-H. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:8211–8214. doi: 10.1039/c4cc01848f. Xia J-B, Ma Y, Chen C. Org. Chem. Front. 2014;1:468–472. doi: 10.1039/C4QO00057A. Pitts CR, Ling B, Woltornist R, Liu R, Lectka T. J Org. Chem. 2014;79:8895–8899. doi: 10.1021/jo501520e. Halperin SD, Fan H, Chang S, Martin RE, Britton R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:4690–4693. doi: 10.1002/anie.201400420. Ventre S, Petronijevic FR, MacMillan DWC. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:5654–5657. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02244.
  • 12.a) Smidt J, Hafner W, Sedlmeier J, Jira R, Rüttinger R. Angew. Chem. 1959;71:176–182. [Google Scholar]; b) Jira R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:9034–9037. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Michel BM, Steffens LD, Sigman MS. In: Organic Reactions. Denmark SE, editor. Vol. 84. John Wiley & Sons; 2014. pp. 75–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsuji J. Synthesis. 1984:369–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.For reviews on selectivity in Wacker oxidations, see: Muzart J. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:7505–7521. McDonald RI, Liu G, Stahl SS. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:2981–3019. doi: 10.1021/cr100371y. Sigman MS, Werner EW. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012;45:874–884. doi: 10.1021/ar200236v. Dong JJ, Browne WR, Feringa BL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:734–744. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404856.
  • 15.a) Morandi B, Wickens ZK, Grubbs RH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:2944–2948. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Morandi B, Wickens ZK, Grubbs RH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:9751–9754. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lerch MM, Morandi B, Wickens ZK, Grubbs RH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:8654–8658. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.For examples of fluorinated terminal olefins in Wacker oxidations, see: Guidotti J, Tordeux M, Blazejewski J-C, Wakselman C. Lett. Org. Chem. 2005;2:148–150. b) see ref. 7c
  • 18.For a review on NOx ligands in palladium catalysis, see: Fairlamb IJS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:10415–10427. doi: 10.1002/anie.201411487.
  • 19.Weiner B, Baeza A, Jerphagnon T, Feringa BL. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:9473–9474. doi: 10.1021/ja902591g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.a) Wickens ZK, Morandi B, Grubbs RH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:11257–11260. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wickens ZK, Skakuj K, Morandi B, Grubbs RH. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:890–893. doi: 10.1021/ja411749k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.For a discussion on the role of tBuOH in aldehyde-selective Wacker oxidations, see: Dong JJ, Harvey EC, Fañanás-Mastral M, Browne WR, Feringa BL. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:17302–17307. doi: 10.1021/ja510163w.
  • 22.For examples of using tBuOH to enhance aldehyde-selectivity in Wacker-type oxidations, see: Feringa BL. J Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986:909–910. Wenzel TT. J Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993:862–864. Ogura T, Kamimura R, Shiga A, Hosokawa T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005;78:1555–1557. Teo P, Wickens ZK, Dong G, Grubbs RH. Org. Lett. 2012;14:3237–3239. doi: 10.1021/ol301240g. Dong JJ, Fañanás-Mastral M, Alsters PL, Browne WR, Feringa BL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:5561–5565. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301809. Bourne SL, Ley SV. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013;355:1905–1910.
  • 23.In addition to 9% unsaturated aldehyde detected by 1H NMR, a linear allylic alcohol (SN2') was formed in 28% yield, confirmed by GC-MS.
  • 24.Although β-fluorinated aldehydes are not stable to column chromatography, the crude products could be directly reduced to stable alcohol derivatives by treatment with NaBH4.
  • 25.Studies by Feringa have shown retention of enantiopurity in allylic amides (ref. 21) and racemization in the case of allylic esters (ref. 22e).
  • 26.Under related conditions optimized for the oxidation of unbiased olefins, 1-dodecene was oxidized with 79% aldehyde selectivity (ref. 20a).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES