Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2015 Jul 31;209(1):94–103. doi: 10.1111/nph.13579

Using modern plant trait relationships between observed and theoretical maximum stomatal conductance and vein density to examine patterns of plant macroevolution

Jennifer C McElwain 1,2,, Charilaos Yiotis 1,2, Tracy Lawson 3
PMCID: PMC5014202  PMID: 26230251

Summary

  • Understanding the drivers of geological‐scale patterns in plant macroevolution is limited by a hesitancy to use measurable traits of fossils to infer palaeoecophysiological function.

  • Here, scaling relationships between morphological traits including maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max) and leaf vein density (D v) and physiological measurements including operational stomatal conductance (g op), saturated (A sat ) and maximum (A max) assimilation rates were investigated for 18 extant taxa in order to improve understanding of angiosperm diversification in the Cretaceous.

  • Our study demonstrated significant relationships between g op, g max and D v that together can be used to estimate gas exchange and the photosynthetic capacities of fossils. We showed that acquisition of high g max in angiosperms conferred a competitive advantage over gymnosperms by increasing the dynamic range (plasticity) of their gas exchange and expanding their ecophysiological niche space. We suggest that species with a high g max (> 1400 mmol m−2 s−1) would have been capable of maintaining a high A max as the atmospheric CO 2 declined through the Cretaceous, whereas gymnosperms with a low g max would experience severe photosynthetic penalty.

  • Expansion of the ecophysiological niche space in angiosperms, afforded by coordinated evolution of high g max , D v and increased plasticity in g op , adds further functional insights into the mechanisms driving angiosperm speciation.

Keywords: evolution of angiosperms, functional traits, maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (gmax), palaeophysiology, plasticity, stomatal density, stomatal evolution, vein density (Dv)

Introduction

Examination of large scale ecological, ecophysiological and physiognomic datasets in plant biology has revealed important trait relationships that are conserved across species (Wright et al., 2004; Grime, 2006; Reich et al., 2007; Kattge et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2015). These suites of correlated traits have enabled classification of extant taxa into broad ecological categories – such as plant functional types – which serve as the starting point for mapping and predicting vegetation responses to past and future global change. They have also contributed strongly to the development of palaeoclimate proxies (Yang et al., 2015). Ongoing studies of extant plant trait relationships are beginning to have a significant impact on the understanding of plant macroecological and macroevolutionary processes in the fossil plant record by providing critical insights into the palaeophysiology and general functional attributes of fossil taxa (Beerling & Woodward, 1997, 2001; Franks & Beerling, 2009a; Wilson & Knoll, 2010; de Boer et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2015) including those that are extinct (Wilson et al., 2008). Many trait based datasets incorporate only functional or only morphological/morphometric traits, yet integration of both data types (such as exemplified by TRY; Kattge et al., 2011) is required if any inferences on the palaeophysiology of fossil taxa from measured morphological attributes is to be made. Gaining insights on the functional biology of fossil taxa will permit a more nuanced assessment of plant macroevolutionary patterns from the fossil plant record.

A compelling example of how modern trait based datasets can be used to gain novel insights into the mechanisms driving plant macroevolution is the ‘vein density hypothesis’ of angiosperm evolution, which uses changes in Cretaceous fossil plant morphological traits (in this case leaf vein density) to reconstruct maximum conductive and photosynthetic capacity of angiosperms vs gymnosperms in Cretaceous fossil floras (Boyce et al., 2009; Brodribb & Feild, 2010; Feild et al., 2011b). According to this hypothesis angiosperms uniquely evolved the capacity to increase leaf vein density above c. 6 mm mm−2 in the mid Cretaceous c. 100 million yr ago (Mya; late Albian–early Cenomanian periods) (de Boer et al., 2012). This anatomical innovation enabled angiosperms to outcompete incumbent gymnosperms (with low vein densities) as it removed a developmental constraint on potential productivity. Supplying more water via a high vein density network to stomata enabled greater transpiration (Boyce et al., 2009; Brodribb & Feild, 2010) and ultimately enhanced the photosynthetic capacity (Brodribb et al., 2007; de Boer et al., 2012).

Another example of how the observed morphological traits measured in fossils are used to estimate palaeophysiology is demonstrated in the palaeo‐proxy CO2 model of Franks et al. (2014). This mechanistic model uses a scaling relationship between the maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max in mmol m−2 s−1), calculated from the density (SD), size and geometry of stomata when fully open (Parlange & Waggoner, 1970; Franks & Beerling, 2009b) and measured conductance values (g op) to infer stomatal conductance of fossil taxa. It is widely known that because stomata respond dynamically with the environment, the anatomical g max is rarely observed in field conditions (Lawson & Morison, 2004; Dow et al., 2014) and that the operational stomatal conductance of a leaf, which we refer to here as g op, is usually measured at much lower values than g max (Franks et al., 2009, 2014). Quantification of the scaling relationship between g op and g max has, however, only been undertaken in detail for two extant angiosperm species – Eucalyptus globulus (Franks et al., 2009) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Dow et al., 2014) and it is not known whether a universal relationship exists across many species. This currently hampers a wider application to the fossil record and integration with other likely correlated functional traits such as vein density.

There is close developmental and physiological coordination of water supply via veins and water loss via stomata at the leaf level (Sack et al., 2003; McElwain, 2011; Brodribb et al., 2013) yet the role of stomatal evolution as a potential driver or accessory to vein density evolution has not been systematically investigated. Furthermore, there are no modern trait datasets that incorporate D v, g max, g op and photosynthetic traits across species. The expectation is that the maximum stomatal conductance should follow a similar evolutionary trajectory in angiosperms and gymnosperms as vein density (Boyce et al., 2009). A primary objective of this study therefore was to investigate the role of stomatal evolution in the ecological and evolutionary success of angiosperms compared with gymnosperms by undertaking a comparative study on plasticity in g op in relation to the theoretical maximum stomatal conductance (g max) and vein density (D v). Specifically we ask: is there a universal scaling relationship between g op and g max; did an increase in maximum gas exchange capacity, facilitated by high g max and D v, enable angiosperms to increase plasticity in their day‐to‐day operational range of stomatal conductance (g op) compared with gymnosperms; and what are the likely evolutionary implications of a greatly expanded g op range in terms of ecological competition, resource use and assimilation rates in a high CO2 world of the Cretaceous (c. 2000 ppm) compared with that of today (c. 400 ppm)?

Materials and Methods

Plant growth conditions

Laurus nobilis L., Drimys winteri J.R. Forst. & G. Forst., Osmunda regalis L., Agathis australis (D. Don) Loudon, Nageia nagi Thunb. O. Kuntze, Lepidozamia hopei Regel, L. peroffskyana Regel, Ginkgo biloba L. and Passiflora caerulae L. were grown in 5 l square pots in a production glasshouse (Cambridge HOK) at UCD Rosemount Environmental Research Station, Dublin, Ireland under ambient Dublin light. Growth light intensity at canopy level (minimum 92 μmol m−2 s−1; maximum 386 μmol m−2 s−1; mean 221 μmol m−2 s−1), glasshouse ambient air temperature (minimum 22°C; maximum 31°C; mean 25.8°C) and relative humidity (minimum 42%; maximum 81%; mean 61.4%) were recorded hourly during the measurement period (27 June 2011–15 July 2011). Protea eximia (Knight) Fourc., Punica granatum L., Greyia sutherlandii Hook & Harv., Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott, Pelargonium ‘Robert Fish’, Citrus × sinensis (L.) Osbeck, Ceratonia silique L., Olea europea L., Manihot esculenta Crantz and Ricinus communis L. were growing in the Mediterranean Collections of the Curvilinear Range glasshouse of the National Botanic Gardens Glasnevin, Ireland under ambient Dublin light. Light intensity at canopy level (304 ± 179 μmol m−2 s−1), glasshouse air temperature (minimum 19°C; maximum 31°C; mean 22°C) and relative humidity (minimum 47%; maximum 87%; mean 67%) were recorded hourly during the measurement period (17 June 2012–21 June 2012). All species were optimally watered and fed.

Leaf gas exchange measurements

The g op measurements were taken over a 13 d period in 2011 using a PP Systems CIRAS 2 portable infra‐red gas analyser (IRGA) equipped with a PP systems PLC 6 (U) leaf cuvette fitted with a rice plate (1.75 cm2) and a 5 d period in July 2012 using a SC‐1 leaf porometer (Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA). Species growing at UCD Rosemount were measured with the IRGA set to the following: CO2 (400 μmol mol−1); light intensities were set to ambient; humidity was set to 60%; air flow to 150 μmol m−2 s−1 and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) c. 1 kPa. Species growing in the Mediterranean collections were measured using the SC‐1 leaf porometer. Each species is represented by measurements from two individuals per species, one to three leaves per individual, two to six measurements per leaf over the course of the day. This protocol was repeated for each leaf over a 5–13 d period resulting in a mean g op based on between 42 and 72 individual measurements per species. This protocol, which we refer to here as the ‘variance protocol’ was carried out in order to capture the fullest range of variance in g op for each species, growing in optimal soil water and nutrient conditions and under the same prevailing climate and light regime. In this respect the chosen methodology was nonconventional because typical protocols used to measure g op attempt to minimize variance by standardizing the light and VPD conditions at the time of measurement and allowing a substantial time for g op to stabilize to the new standardized measurement conditions. To ensure that our ‘variance protocol’ measured in 2011 and 2012 produced a robust mean g op value for each species we repeated the entire experiment in October 2014 with a PP Systems CIRAS 2 portable IRGA following a standardized protocol as follows: the maximum operational stomatal conductance g op(max) for each species was measured at saturating light intensity (determined from preliminary light curves for each species), a leaf temperature of 25°C and VPD c. 1 kPa. The intact leaves were left to equilibrate under optimal conditions for a minimum of 20 min until the increasing stomatal conductance reached a plateau. The g op(max) of each leaf was then calculated as the average of three recordings taken upon full induction of stomatal opening.

Morphological trait measurements and calculation of g max

Following completion of all the physiological measurements the leaves on which the g op measurements were taken were removed from the plants in order to calculate the theoretical g max using the following diffusion equation (Parlange & Waggoner, 1970; Franks & Beerling, 2009b);

gmax=dwv·SD·pamaxpd+π2pamax/π

where dw = diffusivity of water vapour at 25°C (0.0000249 m2 s−1) and v = molar volume of air (0.0224 m3 mol−1) are both constants, SD is stomatal density (m−2), pa max is maximum stomatal pore area (m2) calculated as an ellipse using stomatal pore length (m) as the long axis and l/2 as the short axis; pd is stomatal pore depth (m) considered to be equivalent to the width of an inflated, fully turgid guard cell (Franks & Beerling, 2009a, 2009b).

A 1 cm2 leaf disc was taken for each leaf from the exact position of the g op measurements and positive leaf impressions were taken from the abaxial leaf surface using dental impression material (Coltene PRESIDENT light body) followed by a negative impression using clear nail varnish. Five photomicrographs per leaf impression were recorded at ×200 magnification using a Leica (DMLB, Wetzlar, Germany) epifluorescent microscope. The SD was estimated for each photomicrograph using AcQuis (v.4.0.1.10; Syncroscopy Ltd, Cambridge, UK) by placing a 0.09 mm2 grid on the image and counting the number of stomata within the box and those touching two of the border lines and the corner where they intersect. The cuticle preparations were made for any species that did not yield clearly visible stomata from dental impressions using a 1 : 1 mixture of glacial acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide and heated at 65°C. Cuticles were rinsed in deionized water following 6–7 d of maceration, stained with safranin and mounted onto a slide containing glycerol gelatin. The stomatal pore length and guard cell width measurements were taken for 5–20 open stomata per photomicrograph in AcQuis. The vein density (D v) was determined for the same leaves on which conductance and stomatal density measurements were taken. The leaf tissue was bleached using 2.5 or 5% sodium hydroxide for 1–3 d, followed by sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 h to 1 d. The cleared leaves were then rinsed in deionized water and stained with mildly acidified Toluidine Blue (pH 5.5) for 2–10 min. Photomicrographs of the cleared leaves were taken at ×100 using a Nikon camera (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) stereomicroscope and six measurements of vein length in mm mm−2 area were made for each species in Auto‐Montage (v.5.03).

Estimating saturated assimilation rate (tA sat) from g max

Instantaneous measurements of the assimilation rate (A; μmol m−2 s−1) at light intensities (PAR) of 700 μmol m−2 s−1 and ambient CO2 (400 μmol mol−1) were recorded alongside g op measurements for a subset of eight species (L. nobilis, D. winteri, O. regalis, A. australis, N. nagi, L. hopei, L. peroffskyana, G. biloba) growing at UCD Rosemount Environmental research station using a CIRAS 2 portable IRGA (see g op methodology earlier) over an 11 d period in 2011 (27 June 2011–15 July 2011). A logarithmic trend line was fitted to A and g op for each of the eight species and used to estimate the theoretical saturated assimilation rates (tA sat) from g max (see later Table 2). The reliability of the estimated tA sat values was assessed by comparison with a new dataset of mean (of 10–12 replicates per species) A sat and A max measurements of the same eight species taken in 2013. The A sat measurements were all performed at 400 ppm CO2 and a saturating light of 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 and all A max measurements were performed at 2000 ppm CO2 and saturating light of 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 using a PP Systems CIRAS 2 portable infrared gas analyser. The flow rates were set at 150 μmol and all leaves were left in the chamber for c. 3 min (or until full photosynthetic induction). All measurements were carried out between 09:30 and 12:30 h.

Table 2.

Estimated and measured assimilation rates

Species g max mmol m2 s−1 Measured A sat at 400 ppm μmol−1 mm2 s−1 Measured A max at 2000 ppm μmol−1 mm2 s−1 Est. tA max at 400 ppm V μmol−1 mm2 s−1 Model to estimate tA max from g max
Lepidozamia hopei (G) 374 7.63 ± 1.06 17.20 ± 4.00 7.56 tA max = 1.9624loge (g max)−4.06 (r 2 0.4475; < 0.001)
Lepidozamia peroffskiana (G) 491 4.73 ± 1.91 8.87 ± 0.98 11.17 tA max = 3.1225loge (g max)−8.18 (r 2 0.8111; < 0.001)
Nageia nagi (G) 526 5.24 ± 1.02 19.34 ± 2.00 9.11 tA max = 2.4814loge (g max)−6.44 (r 2 0.793; < 0.001)
Agathis australis (G) 554 11.5 ± 1.59 20.80 ± 3.70 11.55 tA max = 3.1225loge (g max)−8.18 (r 2 0.6587; < 0.001)
Osmunda regalis (F) 669 7.79 ± 1.44 12.00 ± 2.00 12.36 tA max = 3.9086loge (g max)−13.07 (r 2 7003; < 0.001)
Gingko biloba (G) 374 4.44 ± 1.80 17.60 ± 3.30 10.15 tA max = 3.7973loge (g max)−12.35 (r 2 0.7109; < 0.001)
Laurus nobilis (A) 1529 9.37 ± 1.86 18.29 ± 0.26 18.74 tA max = 4.2584loge (g max)−12.48 (r 2 0.9055; < 0.001)
Passiflora caerulae (A) 963 9.20 ± 1.90 21.25 ± 3.29 16.58 tA max = 4.4852loge (g max)−14.24 (r 2 0.7092; < 0.001)

g max, maximum theoretical stomatal conductance; A sat, saturated assimilation rate; A max, maximum assimilation rate. = 10–12; errors, ± SD; G, gymnosperm; A, angiosperm; F, fern.

Results and discussion

Scaling relationship between g max and g op

The best fit scaling relationship between g max and g op for 12 angiosperm, five gymnosperm and one fern species investigated in this study was found to be g op = 0.25 g max (r 2 = 0.5446, = 0.00039) (Fig. 1a) which is in good agreement with the previously reported results from single species studies such as Eucalyptus (g op c. 0.2 g max; Franks et al., 2009) and Arabidopsis (g op = 0.2 g max; Dow et al., 2014) but lower than some purely experimental based reports (g op = 0.5 g max−0.03; Franks et al., 2014). The results of this study are the most comprehensive, to date, in terms of the number of species investigated and confirm that, on average, plants operate at a stomatal conductance that is only a fraction (c. 25%) of their theoretical maximum anatomical limits when growing in field and glasshouse conditions (Fig.  1a, Supporting Information Fig. S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Relationship between stomatal and photosynthetic traits. (a) Scaling relationship between maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max) and mean operational stomatal conductance (g op) of five gymnosperms (green squares), one fern (blue squares) and 12 angiosperm (pink squares) species measured using the ‘variance protocol’ in glasshouse conditions over a 5–13 d period in 2011–2012. All data points represent mean g op values of between 42 and 72 individual measurements per species regressed against g max (g op = 0.2507 g max; r 2 = 0.5446, = 0.00039). (b) Species g op : g max scaling relationships (± standard deviation) regressed against mean saturated photosynthetic rate (A sat) (g op : g max = 0.0125A sat + 0.093; r 2 = 0.36652; = 0.007758). Examples of species studied from left to right include Nageia nagi, Ginkgo biloba and Lepidozamia peroffskyana (upper panel) and Colocasia esculentaOsmunda regalis and Ricinus communis (lower panel).

Despite the apparent convergence in the ratio of g op : g max from three independent studies (Franks et al., 2009; Dow et al., 2014; this work) considerable variability exists at the individual species level which cannot be easily explained by biogeography, habit, ecology or partitioned by phylogenetic group (e.g. angiosperm vs gymnosperm; Table S1, Fig. S2). For example, stomatal conductivities of the tropical crops R. communis (castor oil), Ceratonia siliqua (carob) and M. esculenta (cassava) occasionally reach 80% of their respective g max, but another important crop C. esculenta (taro) operates further under its theoretical g max than G. biloba, a ‘living fossil’ gymnosperm (Fig. S2). At the opposite end of the scale, N. nagi, a broad‐leafed temperate conifer from Japan and two woody Magnoliids from contrasting climates, L. nobilis (Mediterranean) and D. winteri (temperate rain forest) all conduct at < 20% of their theoretical potential (g max ≤ 0.2 g op, Fig. S2). The species‐level scaling relationship between g max and g op could also not be predicted based on stomatal density (R 2 = 0.0166), stomatal pore length (R 2 = 0.0862) or pore depth (R 2 = 0.2927) (Table 1). However, there was a tendency among all species belonging to more recently derived lineages to utilize a much greater proportion of the theoretical g max than species with deep phylogenetic origins (Table S2). This pattern, although not statistically significant (g op : g max vs generic stem age: R 2 = 0.1662, Table S2) suggested that perhaps older lineages were constrained by some other aspect of their morphology/anatomy, such as vein density than more recently derived species. It is also possible that aspects of stomatal complex morphology, anatomy and/or chemistry (e.g. guard cell lignification, presence/absence of stomatal ledges and subsidiary cells) not considered here may also play a role in the range of interspecies variability observed between g op : g max (Franks & Farquhar, 2007).

Table 1.

Mean (± standard deviation) stomatal density (SD), geometry, conductance and vein density data

Species SD mm−2 Pore length μm Pore depth μm Maximum g op : g max g max mmol m−2 s−1 Average g op mmol m−2 s−1 Maximum g op mmol m−2 s−1 Average g op : g max D v mm mm−2
Lepidozamia hopei 39 ± 3.9 26.2 ± 1.8 14.12 ± 5.9 0.398 374 66 ± 29.8 149 0.18 0.93
Nageia nagi 104 ± 9.7 15.9 ± 0.8 11.20 ± 1.44 0.146 526 31 ± 20.9 77 0.06 1.02
Agathis australis 95 ± 15.4 19.4 ± 0.8 15.09 ± 1.52 0.308 554 64 ± 31.5 171 0.11 1.13
L. peroffskyana 40 ± 1.3 27.7 ± 1.4 9.65 ± 1.63 0.334 491 65 ± 41.5 164 0.13 1.33
Ginkgo biloba 51 ± 15.6 19.9 ± 1.8 10.57 ± 2.83 0.692 374 117 ± 68.3 259 0.31 1.37
Osmunda regalis 55 ± 8.0 32.7 ± 4.0 17.02 ± 3.2 0.375 698 132 ± 66.0 262 0.19 3.27
Drimys winteri 131 ± 11.9 18.3 ± 2.9 10.19 ± 1.05 0.293 863 130 ± 44.1 253 0.15 4.87
Protea eximia 76 ± 6.0 14.1 ± 2.3 8.9 ± 1.0 0.590 361 129 ± 115.2 213 0.36 2.6
Punica granatum 80 ± 1.0 7.5 ± 1.1 3.8 ± 0.5 0.765 226 81 ± 43.0 173 0.36 3.0
Greyia sutherlandii 83 ± 11 17.7 ± 3.3 8.8 ± 0.9 0.714 559 186 ± 95.9 399 0.33 3.2
Laurus nobilis 205 ± 29.8 19.2 ± 1.9 9.14 ± 1.19 0.164 1529 105 ± 88.7 250 0.07 5.71
Colocasia esculenta 81 ± 10 13.3 ± 2.4 4.4 ± 1.3 0.530 487 71 ± 58.1 258 0.15 4.4
Pelargonium rf 63 ± 7 15.7 ± 2.7 5.3 ± 0.7 0.966 443 191 ± 89.1 428 0.43 4.6
Citrus sinensis 390 ± 12 6.3 ± 1.0 6.4 ± 1.0 0.364 626 113 ± 45.3 228 0.18 5.1
Ceratonia siliqua 135 ± 15 12.9 ± 1.8 3.8 ± 0.6 0.834 1292 354 ± 194.2 1077 0.27 6.2
Olea europea 345 ± 11 6.2 ± 0.7 2.7 ± 0.4 0.481 865 195 ± 110.1 416 0.23 6.2
Manihot esculenta 180 ± 11 16.7 ± 1.8 8.0 ± 1.3 0.811 1164 452 ± 180.4 944 0.39 6.7
Ricinus communis 163 ± 19 15.1 ± 1.8 5.3 ± 0.8 0.984 1736 677 ± 350.0 1708 0.39 8.7

g op, operational stomatal conductance; g max, maximum theoretical stomatal conductance; D v, leaf vein density.

To investigate the potential underlying reasons for interspecies variability, g op : g max ratios were plotted against saturating assimilation (A sat) rates for all 18 species investigated. A significant positive relationship was observed (r 2 = 0.36652, = 0.0077) suggesting that species with innately higher net photosynthetic rates use more of their maximum anatomical potential in terms of gas exchange than species with lower A sat values (Fig. 1b). This is an important finding in the context of palaeoecophysiological studies as it provides further constraints on our capacity to estimate gas exchange rates from fossil stomatal anatomical data. It also has a bearing on palaeo‐CO2 estimates that are based in large part on accurate estimates of the fossil plant g op such as that of Franks et al. (2014). Based on the analysis presented in Fig. 1(b), a g op : g max ratio of > 0.25 should be assigned to fossil taxa with high photosynthetic rates (which can be inferred from high vein densities (D v) (Boyce & Zwieniecki, 2012) or short vein to stomatal distances (Brodribb et al., 2007). By contrast g op : g max ratios of < 0.25 should be assigned to fossil taxa if other anatomical data indicate that they had low photosynthetic rates.

Coordination of stomatal and vein density evolution

This study is the first detailed examination of the relationships between g op, g max and D v. A strong positive correlation was observed between vein density (D v) and g op (R 2 = 0.8314; = 14.379x 2 − 65.238+ 139.79) (Fig. 2, Table 1) which indicates close coordination of stomatal and vein density evolution in agreement with previous studies (Sack et al., 2003; Brodribb et al., 2007; Boyce et al., 2009; Feild et al., 2011b). We also demonstrate a significant positive correlation between vein density and theoretical g max (R 2 = 0.741; Fig. 2) suggesting that the evolution of high vein density angiosperms during the Cretaceous period may have facilitated a rise in their theoretical maximum stomatal conductivities. This would have allowed an increase in the average operational conductivities of angiosperms with D vs over 4 mm mm−2 (Fig. 2). More importantly, the results also show that the margin of difference between g max and g op increases with D v (Fig. S3). This suggests that the evolution of high vein densities also dramatically increased the range of g op in angiosperms providing them with significantly greater plasticity and flexibility to maximize CO2 uptake and water loss when conditions were optimal (Fig. 2). Our analysis shows that species with vein densities of ≤ 4.0 mm mm−2 have mean g op values c. 400 mmol m−2 s−1 below their respective theoretical g max values, whereas the majority of species with D v of 6 mm mm−2 and greater are typically operating between 600 and 1000 mmol m−2 s−1 below their theoretical maximum potential (g max) (Fig. 2). Our study therefore supports the ‘vein density hypothesis’ (Boyce et al., 2009; Brodribb & Feild, 2010; Feild et al., 2011a) that proposes a transformative influence of high vein density on conductive capacity of angiosperms compared with gymnosperms but goes further to show that the coordination of high vein density and high g max also dramatically increased the dynamic operational conductance range of angiosperms (as indicated by wide interquartile g op ranges in Fig. 2b) compared with other seed plant groups. Indeed the examination here of scaling relationships between g max, g op and D v (Fig. 2) helps to explain the apparent coordinated surge in both D v (Boyce et al., 2009; Feild et al., 2011a) and modelled g op (Fig. 7 in Franks & Beerling, 2009a,b) c. 100 Mya in the mid Cretaceous, the latter of which Franks & Beerling attribute to falling atmospheric CO2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Examination of relationships between stomatal and leaf vein traits. (a) Relationship between vein density (D v, mm mm−2) and both operational stomatal conductance (g op; coloured boxplots based on variance protocol from 2011 to 2012) and theoretical stomatal conductance (g max; coloured dots) of 12 angiosperms (ang.), five gymnosperms (gym.) and one fern (fn.). From left to right species are: Lepidozamia hopei (gym., cycad), Nageia nagi (gym., conifer), Agathis australis (gym., conifer), L. peroffskyana (gym., cycad), Ginkgo biloba (gym.), Protea examina (ang.), Punica granatum (ang.), Greyia sutherlandii (ang.), Osmunda regalis (fn.), Colocasia esculenta (ang.), Pelargonium ‘Robert Fish’ (ang.), Drimys winteri (ang.), Citrus sinensis (ang.), Laurus nobilis (ang.), Ceratonia siliqua (ang.), Olea europea (ang.), Manihot esculenta (ang.), Ricinus communis (ang.). Regression line (blue) is a second order polynomial between g max and D v (r 2 = 0.741; = 27.574x 2 − 93.365+ 512.84). Small black dots are statistical outlier g op values. g op boxplots illustrate the 25% and 75% quartiles (top and bottom of box), median values (horizontal bar) and whiskers represent 2nd and 98th percentiles for each species based on between 42 and 72 individual measurements. (b) Inset figure illustrates the theoretical expansion of ecophysiological (g op) space (grey horizontal bars) with increasing g max and D v. Solid line is mean g max for D v 0–3, > 3–5, > 5–7 and > 7–9 mm mm−2.

The advantage of a significantly expanded g op range in angiosperms is that it likely conferred greater ecophysiological plasticity allowing species with a high vein density and high g max to operate within a much wider ‘ecophysiological niche space’. This in turn may have provided an opportunity for a population to segregate resource use by stomatal conductance. The plasticity of behaviour would only be possible in high D v and high g max species because species with low D v and low g max, as illustrated in Fig. 2(b), have very constrained and overlapping g op ranges. Following this reasoning it could be argued that on evolutionary timescales increasing vein densities in angiosperms not only expanded the capacity for increased uptake of CO2 in exchange for water (Boyce et al., 2009; Brodribb & Feild, 2010; Feild et al., 2011a), but also expanded the breadth of ecophysiological niche space on which selection could act. Stomatal control of g op in a patchy landscape may therefore have enabled different individuals within the same species, or different species within the same community, to share rather than compete for available resources (N, P, H2O) by controlling how close or far away the species operated from maximum theoretical (g max) limits. Increased landscape complexity and ‘patchiness’ in terms of available niches has been suggested for the Cretaceous period (Coiffard et al., 2012). This potential mechanism for angiosperm speciation is demonstrated conceptually in Fig. 2(b) where the number of theoretical ‘stomatal conductance niches’ are shown to increase with increasing g max and D v. By contrast, all species with a low D v have narrow and overlapping g op ranges. Support for the concept of increasing ecological complementarity via an expansion of stomatal conductance niches comes from stable carbon and oxygen isotopic studies (Moreno‐Gutiérrez et al., 2012). These show evidence of consistent segregation of ‘ecophysiological niche space’ among coexisting species to maximize community level plant water use efficiency (Moreno‐Gutiérrez et al., 2012). The concept of wide plasticity in angiosperms compared with gymnosperms has been demonstrated for many traits such as genome size (Leitch & Leitch, 2013), post‐disturbance regeneration time (Midgley & Bond, 1991), pollination to fertilization interval (Cernusak et al., 2009). We suggest that plasticity of operational stomatal conductance is an additional example of behavioural flexibility that angiosperms may have capitalized on. We acknowledge, however, that when considering the role of stomata in ecological interactions among species the speed of stomatal opening/closing response and regulation of stomata by environmental factors and at the signalling level (Hetherington & Woodward, 2003; Franks & Farquhar, 2007; Brodribb et al., 2009; Brodribb & McAdam, 2011; Lawson et al., 2011; Lawson & Blatt, 2014; McAdam & Brodribb, 2015) are likely equally important as wide plasticity in g op and high absolute conductive capacity in determining a species competitive ability.

Within species there is a tendency for increased g op to be achieved by decreasing stomatal size and increasing density (Hetherington & Woodward, 2003; Franks et al., 2009). The present study suggests that this tendency may not apply across species as no significant correlations were observed between g op and stomatal pore area (r 2 = 0.0042) or depth (r 2 = 0.0525) and a complex relationship was observed with stomatal density (SD), where both operational and theoretical conductivities increased with increasing SD (r 2 = 0.6675, g max and SD; r 2 = 0.3255, g op and SD) up to a threshold of c. 250 stomata mm−2, after which they declined sharply despite increasing SD (Fig. S4). This suggests that the observed pattern of steeply increasing g max and g op in species with high vein densities (Fig. 2a) was achieved by multiple combinations of different stomatal density and pore geometries and was not exclusively driven by high densities of small stomata as previously predicted (Franks et al., 2009; de Boer et al., 2012). The lack of a significant relationship between the stomatal pore area and g op may be due to the small sample size of just 18 species. Equally, however, this may reflect different weighting of the functional roles of stomata in the species analysed as part of this study. Stomata have three primary functional roles (Raven, 2002): they optimize CO2 uptake against water loss; they are involved in thermoregulation of leaves via conductive cooling and they provide protection against catastrophic embolisms. Optimization of gas exchange in environments that suffer water deficit may select for species with high densities of small stomata (Franks et al., 2009; de Boer et al., 2012), however, the requirement for leaf cooling in hot climates with high light intensities may select for species with moderate densities of mid‐sized stomata (e.g. R. communis, Table 1).

The trend of increasing disparity between g max and g op in species with a high vein density was unexpected. We have interpreted the trend in terms of a means to expand the dynamic range of ecophysiological behaviour of high vein density species. An alternative interpretation is that the ecophysiological behaviour of modern extant species is somehow a legacy of the palaeoatmospheric conditions under which they radiated. Gymnosperms as a group were ecologically dominant during the early and middle Mesozoic when atmospheric CO2 concentrations were on average five times higher than today (e.g. c. 2000 μmol mol−1). Angiosperms on the other hand underwent their greatest radiation as CO2 concentrations declined through the Cretaceous period. It is widely theorized (McElwain et al., 2005; Brodribb & Feild, 2010; Feild et al., 2011a) but not universally accepted (Boyce & Zwieniecki, 2012) that the declining Cretaceous atmospheric CO2 concentration from c. 2000 to c. 400 μmol mol−1 contributed to the rise in angiosperms over gymnosperms because angiosperms uniquely developed traits that would enable them to maintain carbon gain under ‘CO2 starvation’. Next therefore, we quantified the direct photosynthetic advantage of increasing g max via an increase in stomatal density and/or stomatal pore geometry under both ambient (400 ppm) and simulated Cretaceous (2000 ppm) CO2 (Fig. 3a,c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Examination of relationships between stomatal conductance and assimilation. (a) Assimilation rate (A) vs operational stomatal conductance (g op, coloured symbols) and maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max, red arrow) collected in 2011 and 2012 for a range of species with low (≤ 1.00 mm mm−2), medium (> 1–3.5 mm mm−2) and high (> 5.0 mm mm−2) vein densities (D v). See Table 2 for r 2 values and trendline equations for each species. (b) Illustrates potential pathways to increasing assimilation rate. A–C would take place on evolutionary timescales, whereas A–B can occur within the lifetime of an individual plant by increasing stomatal density and/or pore geometry. (c) A comparison of the relationships between measured A sat (± standard deviation) and g max (A sat = 0.0092, g max, r 2 = 0.896), estimated saturated assimilation rate (tA sat) and g max (tA sat = 0.009 G max + 5.972, r 2 = 0.8766) and measured A max and g max (A max = 0.0026 G max + 15.109, r 2 = 0.0566). Inset figure (d) is a stylized representation of data in (c) illustrating that low g max would likely not have imposed a diffusional limitation on assimilation rate in the high CO 2 world of early Cretaceous (c. 2000 ppm) but would likely induce a severe diffusional limitation by the late Cretaceous when CO 2 levels had dropped to levels close to modern ambient (c. 400 ppm).

Maximum photosynthetic capacity is regulated by coordination of g max and D v

Theoretical saturated assimilation rates (which we refer to here as tA sat) were estimated for a subset of eight species (one fern, five gymnosperms and two angiosperms) based on their respective g max values fitted to A : g op curves collected using gas analysis in 2011 (see the Materials and Methods section). Our results suggest that although stomatal limitation on photosynthesis may be small within species (Farquhar & Sharkey, 1982; Hetherington & Woodward, 2003), comparison across species demonstrates that differences in g max can impose a significant constraint on the assimilation rate (Table 2). Species with low g max (c. 400 mmol m−2 s−1), for example L. hopei (D v = 0.93 mm mm−2, tA sat = 7.56 μmol m−2 s−1) and G. biloba (D v = 3.05 mm mm−2, tA sat = 10.15 μmol m−2 s−1), have tA sat values capped at c. 11 μmol m−2 s−1 under current ambient CO2 concentrations (Fig. 3a, Table 2). Species with moderate g max values (c. 700 mmol m−2 s−1) such as A. australis (D v = 1.13 mm mm−2, tA sat = 10.15 μmol m−2 s−1) and O. regalis (D v = 3.05 mm mm−2, tA sat = 10.15 μmol m−2 s−1) have slightly higher assimilation rates of c. 12 μmol m−2 s−1, whereas species with the highest g max values of over 1000 mmol m−2 s−1 have the correspondingly highest assimilation rates (e.g. L. nobilis; D v = 5.71 mm mm−2, tA sat = 18.74 μmol m−2 s−1 and P. caerulae D v = 12.36 mm mm−2, tA sat = 16.58 μmol m−2 s−1) (Fig. 3a, Table 2).

The interspecies comparison in Fig. 3, highlighted by the inset figure (Fig.  3b), illustrates that assimilation rates can be enhanced by one of two possible routes: (1) by increasing g max and holding vein density (D v) constant (Fig. 3b); or (2) by maintaining the same g max and increasing D v. The stomatal density and geometry are highly responsive to atmospheric CO2 concentration on time‐scales of weeks to decades (Wagner et al., 1996; Haworth et al., 2013) but vein densities are much less responsive to CO2, despite being highly responsive to many other environmental factors (Uhl & Mosbrugger, 1999). This implies that increases in assimilation rate via developmental and/or morphological processes (underlying biochemistry is not considered here but may play a role) could be rapidly achieved within an individual plant or population by increasing g max, but could only be achieved on evolutionary timescales by increasing vein density.

It also highlights how ‘transformative’ (Boyce et al., 2009) increasing the vein density was for angiosperms compared with gymnosperms because although species with a low D v can incrementally enhance assimilation rates with relatively small changes in D v or g max, a doubling of assimilation rates via morphological/developmental change can only be achieved by increasing D v above 5 mm mm−2 (Fig. 3 inset). It is argued that both D v and g max are coordinated at the leaf level by evolutionary controls on cell size (Brodribb et al., 2013) which imply that simple modification to cell size, perhaps through whole genome duplication (which is common among angiosperms but not gymnosperms; Van de Peer et al., 2009) would offer a means of doubling D v and g max in a coordinated way. The comparison here of Passiflora and Laurus (Fig. 3a) also illustrates that once a D v threshold of 5 has been passed, subtle changes in g max can have an equally important control on the assimilation rate, as do changes in D v under current ambient CO2. This observation was predicted by the model of de Boer et al. (2012).

Our data show an unequivocal advantage of angiosperm species with high D v and/or high g max at modern ambient CO2 concentrations of c. 400 μmol mol−1 (Fig. 3a). In order to test further the hypothesis that high g max in species with a high vein density conferred an advantage to angiosperms under declining Cretaceous atmospheric CO2 concentration, we also examined whether the photosynthetic advantage of high D v and g max could be lost under elevated CO2 conditions of 2000 μmol mol−1, similar to those of the early Cretaceous when gymnosperms were the dominant ecological element in the majority of world biomes. Maximum (A max) and saturating (A sat) assimilation rates were measured for the same subset of eight species (one fern, five gymnosperms and two angiosperms) under saturating light (1000 μmol m−2 s−1) at 2000 μmol mol−1 and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2, respectively (Tables 2, S2). The results show that an elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration only modestly raises A max above A sat in the studied angiosperms (by 113 ± 18%) but had a profound effect on gymnosperms, raising the A max by 173 ± 46% above A sat (Fig. 3c, Table 2). This is consistent with the modelled differences between evergreens and deciduous taxa where species with robust leaves and high mesophyll resistance showed a significant increase in A and water use efficiency under elevated CO2 (Niinemets et al., 2011). These results indicate that the photosynthetic advantage conferred by high D v and high g max under modern ambient atmospheric CO2 levels, was likely to be completely lost in the elevated [CO2] world of the early Cretaceous (Fig. 3c).

Elevated CO2 reduces the diffusional limitation of stomata on assimilation rates in any species with low g max values. This is best demonstrated by the substantial rise (by 173%) in A max values of the gymnosperms studied here when exposed to elevated [CO2]. Based on our analysis it is likely that early Cretaceous gymnosperm species with low g max and low D v, similar to the cycad, ginkgo and conifers examined in this study, would have possessed assimilation rates as high as or higher than extant angiosperms (Fig. 3c). By contrast, when the same species were subjected to CO2 levels more similar to those of the late Cretaceous (c. 400 μmol mol−1; Barclay et al., 2010), a severe diffusional penalty was imposed. These results on modern extant taxa predict that palaeospecies with g max values at or below a threshold level of c. 1400 mmol mm−2 s−1 (Fig. 3d) would not have been able to maintain assimilation rates equivalent to species possessing high g max values under Cretaceous atmospheric CO2 decline. In a palaeolandscape where other environmental conditions were optimal for growth lower assimilation rates would therefore undermine the competitive ability of low g max species. A detailed site‐specific analysis of fossil leaf g max values in Cretaceous angiosperms vs gymnosperms is now required to examine when and if angiosperms crossed this critical g max threshold of c. 1400 mmol mm−2 s−1 and whether it coincided with the first occurrence of leaves with vein densities > 5 mm mm−2 as would be predicted if both evolved in coordination. As atmospheric CO2 levels continue to rise over the next century the competitive landscape of gymnosperms and angiosperms may shift again to a level playing field where diffusional limitation on assimilation is reduced for species with low densities of stomata and veins.

Conclusions

Despite extensive field surveys of g op across different plant species and environmental gradients (Körner, 1994; Schulze et al., 1994; Lin et al., 2015) understanding of the scaling relationship between g op and g max is limited to just a handful of species (Beerling et al., 1998; Franks et al., 2009; Dow et al., 2014). Further understanding of this relationship would enable anatomical traits to be linked to function, providing a means of tracking palaeophysiological responses over geological time. We have demonstrated that, on average, species growing in glasshouse conditions conduct H2O and CO2 through stomatal pores at c. 25% of their theoretical maximum limits (g op = 0.25 g max) determined by stomatal geometry and density (Fig. 1). Wide variability in mean g op : g max is, however, apparent and appears to be tightly correlated with A sat.

A strong positive correlation was observed between vein density (D v) and g op (r 2 = 0.8314), and between vein density and theoretical g max (r 2 = 0.741), both of which indicate close coordination of stomatal and vein density evolution. Our study elaborates on the ‘vein density hypothesis’ (Boyce et al., 2009; Brodribb & Feild, 2010; Feild et al., 2011a) by proposing that the coordinated evolution of high vein density and high g max in angiosperms dramatically increased their range of dynamic operational conductance compared with gymnosperm ancestors. This likely conferred greater ecophysiological plasticity to angiosperms allowing species with a high g max and D v to operate within a much wider ecophysiological niche space, which in turn provided an opportunity for a population to segregate resource use by stomatal conductance. Our study also supports the ‘Cretaceous carbon starvation hypothesis’; we have demonstrated that the evolution of unique traits such as high D v and g max in angiosperms conferred them with a competitive advantage over gymnosperms by facilitating higher assimilation rates as atmospheric CO2 declined, but also by greatly expanding the ecophysiological niche space in which they could operate.

Supporting information

Please note: Wiley Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

Fig. S1 A comparison of the linear relationships between average g op and anatomical g max when g op is measured using the ‘variance protocol’ with a porometer vs the standardized protocol using an IRGA.

Fig. S2 Range of scaling relationships observed between mean g op and theoretical g max and maximum g op and g max for gymnosperms, a fern and angiosperms.

Fig. S3 Graph showing that the divergence between g max and g op increases with increasing D v.

Fig. S4 Graph illustrating relationship between maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max) and stomatal density (SD) and between operational stomatal conductance (g op) and SD.

Table S1 Estimated stem and crown ages of species lineages studied

Table S2 Species investigated and number of replicates in repeat analysis dataset October 2015 g op(max)

Acknowledgements

Science Foundation Ireland is gratefully acknowledged for funding (SFI‐PI‐1103). We thank the following: UCD MSc students M. O'Neill and D. Lucey for g op data collection, C. Evans‐Fitzgerald and M. O'Neill for collection of vein density data, B. Moran and D. O'Callaghan for horticultural support at UCD Rosemount Environmental Research Centre, Dr M. Jebb, Director of the Botanic Gardens Glasnevin for access to plant specimens, Dr S. Yates, University of Essex for assistance with R code for Fig. 2(a). C. Elliott‐Kingston, A. Porter and C. Evans‐Fitzgerald are thanked for comments on the manuscript. Taylor Field, Claire Belcher and three anonymous referees are sincerely thanked for their highly constructive input.

The copyright line for this article was changed on 19 August 2015 after original online publication.

References

  1. Barclay RS, McElwain JC, Sageman BB. 2010. Carbon sequestration activated by a volcanic CO2 pulse during Ocean Anoxic Event 2. Nature Geoscience 3: 205–208. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beerling D, Woodward FI. 2001. Vegetation and the terrestrial carbon cycle: the first 400 million years. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beerling DJ, McElwain JC, Osborne CP. 1998. Stomatal responses of the ‘living fossil’ Ginkgo biloba L. to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 1603–1607. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beerling DJ, Woodward FI. 1997. Changes in land plant function over the Phanerozoic: reconstructions based on the fossil record. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 137–153. [Google Scholar]
  5. de Boer HJ, Eppinga MB, Wassen MJ, Dekker SC. 2012. A critical transition in leaf evolution facilitated the Cretaceous angiosperm revolution. Nature Communications 3: 1221–1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyce CK, Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Zwieniecki MA. 2009. Angiosperm leaf vein evolution was physiologically and environmentally transformative. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 1771–1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyce CK, Zwieniecki MA. 2012. Leaf fossil record suggests limited influence of atmospheric CO2 on terrestrial productivity prior to angiosperm evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 10403–10408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS. 2010. Leaf hydraulic evolution led a surge in leaf photosynthetic capacity during early angiosperm diversification. Ecology Letters 13: 175–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Jordan GJ. 2007. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiology 144: 1890–1898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ, Carpenter RJ. 2013. Unified changes in cell size permit coordinated leaf evolution. New Phytologist 199: 559–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brodribb TJ, McAdam SAM. 2011. Passive origins of stomatal control in vascular plants. Science 331: 582–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brodribb TJ, McAdam SAM, Jordan GJ, Feild TS. 2009. Evolution of stomatal responsiveness to CO2 and optimization of water‐use efficiency among land plants. New Phytologist 183: 839–847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cernusak LA, Tcherkez G, Keitel C, Cornwell WK, Santiago LS, Knohl A, Barbour MM, Williams DG, Reich PB, Ellsworth DS et al 2009. Why are non‐photosynthetic tissues generally 13C enriched compared with leaves in C3 plants? Review and synthesis of current hypotheses. Functional Plant Biology 36: 199–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coiffard C, Gomez B, Daviero‐Gomez V, Dilcher DL. 2012. Rise to dominance of angiosperm pioneers in European Cretaceous environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 20955–20959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dow GJ, Bergmann DC, Berry JA. 2014. An integrated model of stomatal development and leaf physiology. New Phytologist 201: 1218–1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33: 317–345. [Google Scholar]
  17. Feild TS, Brodribb TJ, Iglesias A, Chatelet DS, Baresch A, Upchurch GR Jr, Gomez B, Mohr BAR, Coiffard C, Kvacek J et al 2011a. Fossil evidence for Cretaceous escalation in angiosperm leaf vein evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 8363–8366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Feild TS, Upchurch GR, Chatelet DS, Brodribb TJ, Grubbs KC, Samain MS, Wanke S. 2011b. Fossil evidence for low gas exchange capacities for Early Cretaceous angiosperm leaves. Paleobiology 37: 195–213. [Google Scholar]
  19. Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. 2009a. CO2‐forced evolution of plant gas exchange capacity and water‐use efficiency over the Phanerozoic. Geobiology 7: 227–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. 2009b. Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 10343–10347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Franks PJ, Drake PL, Beerling DJ. 2009. Plasticity in maximum stomatal conductance constrained by negative correlation between stomatal size and density: an analysis using Eucalyptus globulus . Plant, Cell & Environment 32: 1737–1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Franks PJ, Farquhar GD. 2007. The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas‐exchange control. Plant Physiology 143: 78–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Franks PJ, Royer DL, Beerling DJ, Van de Water PK, Cantrill DJ, Barbour MM, Berry JA. 2014. New constraints on atmospheric CO2 concentration for the Phanerozoic. Geophysical Research Letters 41: 4685–4694. [Google Scholar]
  24. Grime JP. 2006. Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  25. Haworth M, Elliott‐Kingston C, McElwain JC. 2013. Co‐ordination of physiological and morphological responses of stomata to elevated CO2 in vascular plants. Oecologia 171: 71–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424: 901–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kattge J, Diaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice I, Leadley P, Bönisch G, Garnier E, Westoby M, Reich PB, Wright I. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology 17: 2905–2935. [Google Scholar]
  28. Körner C. 1994. Leaf diffusive conductances in the major vegetation types of the globe In: Schulze ED, Caldwell MM, eds. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 463–490. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lawson T, Blatt MR. 2014. Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology 164: 1556–1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lawson T, Morison JI. 2004. Stomatal function and physiology In: Hemsley AR, Poole I, eds. The evolution of plant physiology; from whole plants to ecosystem. Cambridge, UK: Elsevier Academic, 217–242. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lawson T, von Caemmerer S, Baroli I. 2011. Photosynthesis and stomatal behaviour In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Büdel B, Francis D, eds. Progress in botany 72. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 265–304. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee AP, Upchurch G, Murchie EH, Lomax BH. 2015. Leaf energy balance modelling as a tool to infer habitat preference in the early angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20143052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Leitch IJ, Leitch AR. 2013. Genome size diversity and evolution in land plants In: Greihuber J, Doležel J, Wendel JF, eds. Plant genome diversity, vol. 2 New York, NY, USA: Springer, 307–322. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lin Y‐S, Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Prentice IC, Wang H, Baig S, Eamus D, de Dios VR, Mitchell P, Ellsworth DS. 2015. Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world. Nature Climate Change 5: 459–464. [Google Scholar]
  35. McAdam SA, Brodribb TJ. 2015. The evolution of mechanisms driving the stomatal response to vapor pressure deficit. Plant Physiology 167: 833–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. McElwain JC. 2011. Ferns: a xylem success story. New Phytologist 192: 307–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McElwain JC, Willis KJ, Lupia R. 2005. Cretaceous CO2 decline and the radiation and diversification of angiosperms In: Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Dearing MD, eds. A history of atmospheric CO2 and its effects on plants, animals and ecosystems. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 133–166. [Google Scholar]
  38. Midgley JJ, Bond WJ. 1991. Ecological aspects of the rise of angiosperms: a challenge to the reproductive superiority hypotheses. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 44: 81–92. [Google Scholar]
  39. Moreno‐Gutiérrez C, Dawson TE, Nicolás E, Querejeta JI. 2012. Isotopes reveal contrasting water use strategies among coexisting plant species in a Mediterranean ecosystem. New Phytologist 196: 489–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Niinemets Ü, Flexas J, Peñuelas J. 2011. Evergreens favored by higher responsiveness to increased CO2 . Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 136–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Parlange J‐Y, Waggoner PE. 1970. Stomatal dimensions and resistance to diffusion. Plant Physiology 46: 337–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Raven JA. 2002. Selection pressures on stomatal evolution. New Phytologist 153: 371–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Lusk CH. 2007. Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: a global GLOPNET analysis. Ecological Applications 17: 1982–1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sack L, Cowan P, Jaikumar N, Holbrook N. 2003. The ‘hydrology'of leaves: co‐ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 1343–1356. [Google Scholar]
  45. Schulze E‐D, Kelliher FM, Korner C, Lloyd J, Leuning R. 1994. Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: a global ecology scaling exercise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 629–660. [Google Scholar]
  46. Uhl D, Mosbrugger V. 1999. Leaf venation density as a climate and environmental proxy: a critical review and new data. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 149: 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  47. Van de Peer Y, Fawcett JA, Proost S, Sterck L, Vandepoele K. 2009. The flowering world: a tale of duplications. Trends in plant science 14: 680–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wagner F, Below R, DeKlerk P, Dilcher DL, Joosten H, Kurschner WM, Visscher H. 1996. A natural experiment on plant acclimation: lifetime stomatal frequency response of an individual tree to annual atmospheric CO2 increase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 11705–11708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilson JP, Knoll AH. 2010. A physiologically explicit morphospace for tracheid‐based water transport in modern and extinct seed plants. Paleobiology 36: 335–355. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilson JP, Knoll AH, Holbrook NM, Marshall CR. 2008. Modeling fluid flow in Medullosa, an anatomically unusual Carboniferous seed plant. Paleobiology 34: 472–493. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender‐Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M et al 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang J, Spicer RA, Spicer TEV, Arens NC, Jacques FMB, Su T, Kennedy EM, Herman AB, Steart DC, Srivastava G et al 2015. Leaf form–climate relationships on the global stage: an ensemble of characters. Global Ecology and Biogeography. doi: 10.1111/geb.12334. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Please note: Wiley Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

Fig. S1 A comparison of the linear relationships between average g op and anatomical g max when g op is measured using the ‘variance protocol’ with a porometer vs the standardized protocol using an IRGA.

Fig. S2 Range of scaling relationships observed between mean g op and theoretical g max and maximum g op and g max for gymnosperms, a fern and angiosperms.

Fig. S3 Graph showing that the divergence between g max and g op increases with increasing D v.

Fig. S4 Graph illustrating relationship between maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max) and stomatal density (SD) and between operational stomatal conductance (g op) and SD.

Table S1 Estimated stem and crown ages of species lineages studied

Table S2 Species investigated and number of replicates in repeat analysis dataset October 2015 g op(max)


Articles from The New Phytologist are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES