Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1999 Jun;52(6):435–439. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.6.435

Oesophageal and gastric cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.

S H Burroughs 1, A H Biffin 1, J K Pye 1, G T Williams 1
PMCID: PMC501430  PMID: 10562811

Abstract

AIM: To audit the information content of pathology reports of oesophageal and gastric cancer resection specimens in Wales. METHODS: All such reports from the 16 NHS histopathology laboratories in Wales in a one year period were evaluated for their information content. Two standards were used: (1) best practice reporting, and (2) a minimum dataset required for informed patient management that included clear statements on histological tumour type, depth of tumour invasion, lymph node involvement, and completeness of excision. RESULTS: 282 reports were audited. Minimum standards were achieved in 77% of gastric resections (156/203) and 53% of oesophageal resections (42/79). All laboratories achieved minimum standards in some gastric cancer reports (range 50-100%); three laboratories did not achieve minimum standards in any oesophageal cancer reports (range 0-100%). Best practice reporting was achieved in only 20% of gastric and 18% of oesophageal cancer reports. Failure to include an explicit statement on completeness of excision or involvement of the oesophageal circumferential resection margin were the most frequent causes of inadequate reporting. Most other data items were generally well reported, but apparent inadvertent omission of just one item was noted in many of the substandard reports. CONCLUSIONS: This audit shows the need to improve the information content of pathology reports in gastric and oesophageal cancer. The widespread implementation of template proforma reporting is proposed as the most effective way of achieving this. Multidisciplinary meetings of clinicians involved in cancer management should provide a forum for greater communication between pathologists and surgeons, and help to maintain standards of pathological practice.

Full text

PDF
435

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appleton M. A., Douglas-Jones A. G., Morgan J. M. Evidence of effectiveness of clinical audit in improving histopathology reporting standards of mastectomy specimens. J Clin Pathol. 1998 Jan;51(1):30–33. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bull A. D., Biffin A. H., Mella J., Radcliffe A. G., Stamatakis J. D., Steele R. J., Williams G. T. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit. J Clin Pathol. 1997 Feb;50(2):138–142. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.2.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cross S. S., Feeley K. M., Angel C. A. The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Pathol. 1998 Jun;51(6):481–482. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.6.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cunningham D., Hole D., Taggart D. J., Soukop M., Carter D. C., McArdle C. S. Evaluation of the prognostic factors in gastric cancer: the effect of chemotherapy on survival. Br J Surg. 1987 Aug;74(8):715–720. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LAUREN P. THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49. doi: 10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Oliver S. E., Robertson C. S., Logan R. F. Oesophageal cancer: a population-based study of survival after treatment. Br J Surg. 1992 Dec;79(12):1321–1325. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800791226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rosai J. Standardized reporting of surgical pathology diagnoses for the major tumor types. A proposal. The Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Sep;100(3):240–255. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/100.3.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sagar P. M., Johnston D., McMahon M. J., Dixon M. F., Quirke P. Significance of circumferential resection margin involvement after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 1993 Nov;80(11):1386–1388. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Skinner D. B., Little A. G., Ferguson M. K., Soriano A., Staszak V. M. Selection of operation for esophageal cancer based on staging. Ann Surg. 1986 Oct;204(4):391–401. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198610000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sue-Ling H. M., Johnston D., Martin I. G., Dixon M. F., Lansdown M. R., McMahon M. J., Axon A. T. Gastric cancer: a curable disease in Britain. BMJ. 1993 Sep 4;307(6904):591–596. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6904.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES