Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1999 Sep;52(9):677–680. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.9.677

A prospective audit of pacemaker function, implant lifetime, and cause of death in the patient.

S K Suvarna 1, R D Start 1, D I Tayler 1
PMCID: PMC501543  PMID: 10655989

Abstract

AIM: To audit prospectively the reasons for pacemaker implantation, the duration of the pacemaker use, the cause of death, and pacemaker function after removal from the patient. METHODS: Pacemakers were removed at necropsy, or from the bodies of patients awaiting cremation, in three hospitals over a three year period. The cause of death was taken from the results of the necropsy or from the certified cause of death. Demographic data, including the time of implant and reasons for implantation, were checked. The pacemakers were analysed in terms of battery status, program, and output under a standard 470 ohm load. RESULTS: 69 patients were studied. Average age at death was 78 and 80 years for men and women, respectively. The average duration since pacemaker implantation was 46 months. Eleven patients had necropsies, showing that three died from ischaemic heart disease, six from cardiomyopathy, one from an aortic aneurysm, and one from disseminated neoplasia. From the necropsy results and death certificates, the distribution of causes of death in the group as a whole were ischaemic heart disease (21), cardiomyopathy (8), cerebrovascular disease (11), neoplasia (11), chest infection/chronic obstructive airways disease (8), and other causes (10). In all cases the pacemaker box function was within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: Neither primary nor secondary pacemaker dysfunction was found. The study highlights the impact of arrhythmias in cardiomyopathy, and raises questions about the true role of ischaemic heart disease in these pacemaker requiring patients. The relatively short gap between pacemaker implantation and death requires further study.

Full text

PDF
677

Images in this article

678Image
on p.678
678Image
on p.678
679Image
on p.679

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CHARDACK W. M., GAGE A. A., GREATBATCH W. A transistorized, self-contained, implantable pacemaker for the long-term correction of complete heart block. Surgery. 1960 Oct;48:643–654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FURMAN S., SCHWEDEL J. B. An intracardiac pacemaker for Stokes-Adams seizures. N Engl J Med. 1959 Nov 5;261:943–948. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195911052611904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldman B. S., Nishimura S., Lau C. Survey of cardiac pacing in Canada (1993). Can J Cardiol. 1996 Jun;12(6):573–578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hayes D. L., Vlietstra R. E. Pacemaker malfunction. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Oct 15;119(8):828–835. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mattioli A. V., Rossi R., Annicchiarico E., Mattioli G. Causes of death in patients with unipolar single chamber ventricular pacing: prevalence and circumstances in dependence on arrhythmias leading to pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jan;18(1 Pt 1):11–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mounsey J. P., Ray S. G., Griffith M. J., Gold R. G., Bexton R. S. Impact of internal audit on pacemaker prescription and the immediate costs of pacing in the northern region: towards implementation of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group. Br Heart J. 1994 Apr;71(4):395–398. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.4.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Panja M., Sarkar C. N., Kumar S., Kar A. K., Mitra S., Sinha D. P., Chatterjee A., Roy S., Sarkar N. C., Majumder B. Reuse of pacemaker. Indian Heart J. 1996 Nov-Dec;48(6):677–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pfeiffer D., Jung W., Fehske W., Korte T., Manz M., Moosdorf R., Lüderitz B. Complications of pacemaker-defibrillator devices: diagnosis and management. Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):1073–1080. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90090-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Prahlow J. A., Guileyardo J. M., Barnard J. J. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. A potential hazard for autopsy pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Oct;121(10):1076–1080. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robboy S. J., Harthorne J. W., Leinbach R. C., Sanders C. A., Austen W. G. Autopsy findings with permanent pervenous pacemakers. Circulation. 1969 Apr;39(4):495–501. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.39.4.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sethi K. K., Bhargava M., Pandit N., Mohan J. C., Arora R., Khanna S. K., Khalilullah M. Experience with recycled cardiac pacemakers. Indian Heart J. 1992 Mar-Apr;44(2):91–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shen W. K., Hayes D. L., Hammill S. C., Bailey K. R., Ballard D. J., Gersh B. J. Survival and functional independence after implantation of a permanent pacemaker in octogenarians and nonagenarians. A population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Sep 15;125(6):476–480. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-6-199609150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES