Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: World J Urol. 2014 Sep 21;33(8):1129–1137. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1409-z

Nutritional Predictors of Complications Following Radical Cystectomy

David C Johnson 1, Stephen B Riggs 2, Matthew E Nielsen 1,3,4, Jonathan E Matthews 1,4, Michael E Woods 1,3, Eric M Wallen 1,3, Raj S Pruthi 1,3, Angela B Smith 1,3
PMCID: PMC5015441  NIHMSID: NIHMS813338  PMID: 25240535

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the impact of preoperative nutritional status on the development of surgical complications following cystectomy using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of the NSQIP 2005–2012 Participant Use Data Files. ACS-NSQIP collects data on 135 variables, including pre- and intraoperative data and 30-day post-operative complications and mortality on all major surgical procedures at participating institutions. Preoperative albumin (<3.5 or >3.5 g/dl), weight loss 6 months before surgery (>10%), and BMI were identified as nutritional variables within the database. The overall complication rate was calculated and predictors of complications were identified using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

1,213 patients underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer between 2005–2012. The overall 30-day complication rate was 55.1% (n=668). While 14.7% (n=102) had a preoperative albumin <3.5 g/dL, 3.4% had >10% weight loss in the 6 months prior to surgery, and the mean BMI was 28 kg/m2. After controlling for age, sex, medical comorbidities, medical resident involvement, operation year, operative time and prior operation, only albumin <3.5g/dl was a significant predictor of experiencing a postoperative complication (p=0.03). This remained significant when albumin was evaluated as a continuous variable (p=0.02)

Conclusions

Poor nutritional status measured by serum albumin is predictive of an increased rate of surgical complications following radical cystectomy. This finding supports the importance of preoperative nutritional status in this population and highlights the need for the development of effective nutritional interventions in the preoperative setting.

Keywords: nutrition, albumin, cystectomy, outcomes assessment, urinary bladder neoplasms

Introduction

Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Despite improvements in surgical technique and improved post-operative recovery pathways, RC remains highly morbid, with a 28–64% 90-day complication rate1,2, 27% 90-day re-admission rate3, and 3–7% 90-day mortality rate.24

Pre-operative malnutrition is one potentially significant contributor to the high morbidity and mortality of RC. The association between malnutrition and poor surgical outcomes is well established in the general surgery literature.57 However, only a small number of studies examine nutritional predictors of surgical outcomes after urologic procedures.4,812 While nutritional deficiency lacks a universal definition, researchers and clinicians often define malnutrition using a combination of unintentional weight loss, suboptimal body mass index (BMI), and poor appetite/anorexia.13 Additionally, serum markers such as albumin and prealbumin, in combination with C-reactive protein, are often used to evaluate nutritional status; however, they appear to be more correlative as surrogate markers for disease severity and predictors of operative morbidity and mortality.14

The objective of this study was to investigate which indicators of pre-operative malnutrition were associated with increased perioperative complications after RC for bladder cancer using a large, national database. We hypothesized that serum albumin < 3.5 gm/dL, excessive pre-operative weight loss, and suboptimal body mass index (BMI) were independent predictors of complications within 30 days after RC.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2005–2012. This nationally validated, risk-adjusted, prospectively maintained database includes 135 variables including 30-day morbidity and mortality outcomes for major surgical procedures at over 450 participating institutions across the United States and is specifically designed to evaluate post-surgical outcomes.15 Cases of RC performed for bladder cancer were extracted from the database using ICD-9 codes for bladder neoplasm (188 and 188.x) including carcinoma in situ (233.7) and Current Procedural Terminology codes for radical cystectomy (51570, 51575, 51580, 51585, 51590, 51595, 51596, and 51597). Patients who underwent RC for diagnoses other than bladder cancer were excluded. Nutritional factors including pre-operative albumin, weight loss >10% within 6 months prior to surgery, and BMI were extracted using the corresponding preoperative codes.

Statistical analyses

Univariable analyses were performed to describe the patient population in terms of demographic, prognostic, and treatment factors. These factors included age, sex, race, medical comorbidities, smoking and alcohol history, history of pre-operative surgery or blood transfusion, year of operation, presence and training level of resident in operating room, prior radiation therapy, pre-operative acute renal failure (defined as a rising Cr > 3 mg/dL within 24 hours prior to surgery), chronic steroid use, and American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification. Missing data were excluded. Bivariable analyses were performed to evaluate 30-day complication rates based on pre-operative nutrition factors. Chi-square analyses were used to compare complications between groups of patients with pre-operative serum albumin above and below a threshold of 3.5 g/dL, and between patients who did and did not experience >10% weight loss in the 6 months prior to surgery. A serum albumin cut point of 3.5 g/dL was examined based on prior studies demonstrating the predictive utility of this threshold.4,10,11 The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to evaluate complication rates based on BMI as a non-normal continuous variable. Albumin was also reexamined as a continuous variable as a sensitivity analysis.

Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine which pre-operative nutritional parameters were independent predictors of at least one post-operative complication within 30 days. Initial models included the influential predictors from bivariable analysis (defined as those with a p-value less than 0.2). The final models were selected using backwards elimination of non-significant variables (at the 5% level of significance) so that final models included only the necessary variables affecting the relationship between nutritional parameters and complication rate. SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA) software was used for all statistical analyses. The University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board exempted this study from review.

Results

A total of 1,431 patients underwent RC at participating NSQIP centers from 2005–2012. Of these, 218 (15.2%) were excluded based on diagnoses other than bladder cancer. Overall, 1,213 patients underwent RC for bladder cancer from 2005–2012. Of these patients, 691 (57.0%) had recorded pre-operative serum albumin levels, 1,201 (99.0%) had BMI data, and all patients had data with regard to pre-operative weight loss.

Patients characteristics were different between those with albumin <3.5 g/dL and those with normal albumin in several categories. (Table Ia) Patients with low serum albumin were more likely to be female (36 vs 21%, p<0.01), African American (14 vs 4%, p<0.01), and partially dependent for activities of daily living (9 vs 1%, p<0.01). Patients with low serum albumin were also more likely to have pre-operative acute renal failure (6 vs 0.7%, p<0.01), received radiotherapy for malignancy in the 90 days prior to surgery (3 vs 0.2%, p<0.01), received pre-operative blood transfusion (8 vs 1%, p<0.01), a higher ASA classification (3–5 vs 1–2, p=0.01) and a lower BMI (mean 26.0 vs 27.9 kg/m2, p<0.01). Patients with low albumin were less likely to have had a resident in the operating room during surgery (p=0.02). Lower BMI (mean 24.0 vs 28.0 kg/m2, p<0.01) and increased pre-operative transfusion requirement (13 vs 2%, p<0.01) were the only significant differences between patients who lost greater than 10% of body weight prior to surgery and those who did not. (Table Ib) BMI was significantly associated with several patient characteristics. Patients with lower BMI were more likely to be older (p<0.01), female (p=0.01), have a smoking (p<0.01) and alcohol history (p=0.02), a lower ASA classification (1–2 vs 3–5, p=0.01), and have had excessive pre-operative weight loss (p<0.01). Patients with increased BMI were more likely to have hypertension (p<0.01), diabetes (p<0.01) and a resident present in the OR (p=0.01). Increased age was associated with lower BMI while longer operative time was associated with increased BMI. (Table Ic).

Table 1a.

Distribution of demographic and prognostic characteristics among bladder cancer patients who underwent cystectomy, by measured level of preoperative albumin

Preoperative albumin < 3.5
n (%)
Preoperative albumin >= 3.5
n (%)
p-value
Sexa Male 65 (64) 465 (79) <0.01
Female 37 (36) 122 (21)
Raceb African American 13 (14) 24 (4) <0.01
Hispanic 1 (1) 14 (3)
Other 0 (0) 5 (0.9)
White 78 (85) 506 (92)
Resident presence in ORc Yes 65 (71) 390 (74) 0.57
No 26 (29) 135 (26)
Level of resident surgeon in ORd No resident 22 (27) 92 (21) 0.02
PGY 1 3 (4) 5 (1)
PGY 2 3 (4) 10 (2)
PGY 3 5 (6) 27 (6)
PGY 4 13 (16) 55 (12)
PGY 5 20 (24) 88 (20)
PGY 6+ 17 (20) 171 (38)
Year of operatione 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009 34 (33) 151 (26) 0.11
2010, 2011, or 2012 68 (67) 438 (74)
Diabetes mellitus treated with oral agents or insuline Diabetic treated with insulin 7 (7) 27 (5) 0.60
Diabetic treated with oral agents 13 (13) 84 (14)
Not diabetic 82 (80) 478 (81)
Smoker in past yeare Yes 32 (31) 145 (25) 0.15
No 70 (69) 444 (75)
More than 2 alcoholic drinks in 2 weeks prior to admissione Yes 5 (5) 26 (4) 0.83
No 97 (95) 563 (96)
Functional statuse At least partially dependent 9 (9) 7 (1) <0.01
Independent 93 (91) 582 (99)
One or more pulmonary comorbidities (dyspnea, ventilator dependence, COPD, and/or pneumonia)e Yes 23 (23) 91 (15) 0.07
No 79 (77) 498 (85)
One or more cardiac comorbidities (CHF, MI, angina, PCI, and/or previous cardiac surgery)e Yes 16 (16) 98 (17) 0.81
No 86 (84) 491 (83)
Hypertension requiring medicatione Yes 61 (60) 346 (59) 0.84
No 41 (40) 243 (41)
Preoperative acute renal failuree Yes 6 (6) 4 (0.7) <0.01
No 96 (94) 585 (99)
Preoperative dialysise Yes 0 (0) 2 (0.3) 0.56
No 102 (100) 587 (100)
One or more vascular comorbidities (revascularization and/or rest pain)e Yes 1 (1) 8 (1) 0.76
No 101 (99) 581 (99)
One or more neurological comorbidities (coma, hemiplegia, TIA, CVA with neurological deficit, CVA without neurological deficit, tumor involving CNS, paraplegia, and/or quadriplegia)e Yes 8 (8) 29 (5) 0.23
No 94 (92) 560 (95)
Steroid use for chronic conditione Yes 2 (2) 20 (3) 0.45
No 100 (98) 569 (97)
Greater than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 monthse Yes 5 (5) 21 (4) 0.51
No 97 (95) 568 (96)
Bleeding disordere Yes 5 (5) 22 (4) 0.57
No 97 (95) 567 (96)
Radiotherapy for malignancy in last 90 dayse Yes 3 (3) 1 (0.2) <0.01
No 99 (97) 588 (100)
Prior operation within 30 daysf Yes 9 (9) 37 (6) 0.33
No 92 (91) 550 (94)
ASA classificatione ASA 1 and 2 13 (13) 139 (24) 0.01
ASA 3, 4 and 5 89 (87) 450 (76)
Transfused more than 4 units pRBCs in 72 hours prior to surgerye Yes 8 (8) 8 (1) <0.01
No 94 (92) 581 (99)
Preoperative albumin < 3.0
(median [IQR])
Preoperative albumin >= 3.0
(median [IQR])
Age (years)g 70 (61–78) 68 (61–76) 0.31
Operative time (min) 312 (247–426) 329 (258–423) 0.32
BMIh 26.0 (23.0–30.2) 27.9 (24.5–31.6) <0.01
a

Missing=524

b

Missing=572

c

Missing=597

d

Missing=682

e

Missing=522

f

Missing=525

g

Missing 4 from Preoperative albumin >= 3.5 category

h

Missing 2 from Preoperative albumin < 3.5 category and 4 from Preoperative albumin >= 3.5 category

Table 1b.

Distribution of selected demographic and prognostic characteristics among bladder cancer patients who underwent cystectomy, with and without (excessive) preoperative weight loss

Greater than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months
[n (%)]
Less than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months
[n (%)]
p-value
Sexa Male 30 (75) 899 (77) 0.80
Female 10 (25) 272 (23)
Raceb African American 3 (9) 49 (5) 0.65
Hispanic 0 (0) 26 (3)
Other 0 (0) 7 (0.7)
White 32 (91) 910 (92)
Resident presence in ORc Yes 30 (77) 751 (71) 0.45
No 9 (23) 302 (29)
Level of resident surgeon in ORd No resident 4 (15) 210 (23) 0.90
PGY 1 0 (0) 12 (1)
PGY 2 0 (0) 23 (3)
PGY 3 2 (7) 65 (7)
PGY 4 5 (19) 146 (16)
PGY 5 6 (22) 199 (22)
PGY 6+ 10 (37) 251 (28)
Year of operation 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009 10 (25) 277 (24) 0.84
2010, 2011 or 2012 30 (75) 896 (76)
Diabetes mellitus treated with oral agents or insulin Diabetic treated with insulin 2 (5) 61 (5) 0.26
Diabetic treated with oral agents 2 (5) 167 (14)
Not diabetic 36 (90) 945 (81)
Smoker in past year Yes 13 (33) 285 (24) 0.24
No 27 (67) 888 (76)
More than 2 alcoholic drinks in 2 weeks prior to admission Yes 0 (0) 54 (5) 0.25
No 40 (100) 1119 (95)
Functional status At least partially dependent 2 (5) 20 (2) 0.16
Independent 38 (95) 1153 (98)
One or more pulmonary comorbidities (dyspnea, ventilator dependence, COPD, and/or pneumonia) Yes 11 (28) 192 (16) 0.06
No 29 (73) 981 (84)
One or more cardiac comorbidities (CHF, MI, angina, PCI, and/or previous cardiac surgery) Yes 9 (23) 188 (16) 0.28
No 31 (78) 985 (84)
Hypertension requiring medication Yes 23 (58) 681 (58) 0.94
No 17 (43) 492 (42)
Preoperative acute renal failure Yes 1 (3) 11 (0.9) 0.33
No 39 (98) 1162 (99)
Preoperative dialysis Yes 0 (0) 2 (0.2) 1.00
No 40 (100) 1171 (100)
One or more vascular comorbidities (revascularization and/or rest pain) Yes 0 (0) 19 (2) 1.00
No 40 (100) 1154 (98)
One or more neurological comorbidities (coma, hemiplegia, TIA, CVA with neurological deficit, CVA without neurological deficit, tumor involving CNS, paraplegia, and/or quadriplegia)e Yes 1 (3) 63 (5) 0.72
No 39 (98) 1109 (95)
Steroid use for chronic condition Yes 0 (0) 36 (3) 0.63
No 40 (100) 1137 (97)
Bleeding disorder Yes 0 (0) 41 (4) 0.64
No 40 (100) 1132 (97)
Radiotherapy for malignancy in last 90 days Yes 0 (0) 6 (0.5) 1.00
No 40 (100) 1167 (99)
Prior operation within 30 daysf Yes 5 (13) 63 (5) 0.07
No 35 (88) 1106 (95)
ASA classification ASA 1 and 2 11 (28) 319 (27) 1.00
ASA 3, 4, and 5 29 (73) 854 (73)
Transfused more than 4 units pRBCs in 72 hours prior to surgery Yes 5 (13) 25 (2) <0.01
No 35 (88) 1148 (98)
Greater than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months (median [IQR]) Less than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months (median [IQR])
Age (years)g 73 (66–78) 69 (61–76) 0.09
Operative time (min) 300 (219–371) 320 (252–412) 0.14
BMIh 24.0 (21.3–28.8) 28.0 (24.5–31.6) <0.01
a

Missing=2

b

Missing=186

c

Missing=121

d

Missing=280

e

Missing=1

f

Missing=4

g

Missing 8 from Less than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months category

i

Missing 12 from Less than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months category

Table 1c.

Distribution of body mass index among bladder cancer patients who underwent cystectomy, with and without selected demographic and prognostic characteristics

BMI
(median [IQR])
p-value
Sex Malea 28.0 (24.7–31.2) <0.01
Femaleb 26.5 (22.8–32.2)
Race African Americanc 29.7 (23.8–33.7) 0.57
Hispanic 28.2 (24.5–31.6)
Other 26.4 (24.4–28.6)
Whitea 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
Resident present in OR Yesd 28.2 (24.7–31.7) 0.01
Noe 27.0 (23.6–31.1)
Level of resident surgeon in OR No residentc 26.8 (23.6–31.0) 0.07
PGY 1 29.2 (26.4–31.7)
PGY 2 29.0 (25.7–35.4)
PGY 3 28.2 (25.2–30.8)
PGY 4c 28.2 (24.9–32.6)
PGY 5e 27.8 (24.1–31.0)
PGY 6+c 28.1 (24.7–32.0)
Year of operation 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009f 28.0 (24.3–32.1) 0.93
2010, 2011 or 2012g 27.8 (24.4–31.3)
Diabetes mellitus treated with oral agents or insulin Diabetic treated with insulin 28.7 (25.8–34.5) <0.01
Diabetic treated with oral agentsb 29.8 (26.4–33.6)
Not diabetica 27.4 (24.1–30.8)
Smoker in past year Yesf 26.2 (23.0–30.3) <0.01
Nog 28.2 (24.8–31.9)
More than 2 alcoholic drinks in 2 weeks prior to admission Yes 25.6 (23.7–29.3) 0.02
Noh 28.0 (24.4–31.6)
Functional status At least partially dependentc 25.8 (21.3–30.1) 0.10
Independenti 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
One or more pulmonary comorbidities (dyspnea, ventilator dependence, COPD, and/or pneumonia) Yesc 28.0 (23.7–31.9) 0.94
Noi 27.8 (24.4–31.4)
One or more cardiac comorbidities (CHF, MI, angina, PCI, and/or previous cardiac surgery) Yesf 28.2 (24.7–31.9) 0.18
Nog 27.6 (24.3–31.4)
Hypertension requiring medication Yesj 28.6 (25.0–32.3) <0.01
Nok 26.6 (23.6–30.1)
Preoperative acute renal failure Yes 26.8 (23.4–33.7) 0.84
Noh 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
Preoperative dialysis Yes 33.9 (32.2–35.5) 0.09
Noh 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
One or more vascular comorbidities (revascularization and/or rest pain) Yes 28.6 (25.8–32.8) 0.33
Noh 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
One or more neurological comorbidities (coma, hemiplegia, TIA, CVA with neurological deficit, CVA without neurological deficit, tumor involving CNS, paraplegia, and/or quadriplegia) Yesc 28.1 (24.1–32.2) 0.96
Noi 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
Steroid use for chronic condition Yesc 28.9 (26.1–31.9) 0.20
Noi 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
Greater than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months Yes 24.0 (21.3–28.8) <0.01
Noh 28.0 (24.5–31.6)
Bleeding disorder Yes 27.5 (24.6–30.4) 0.89
Noh 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
Radiotherapy for malignancy in last 90 days Yes 30.2 (23.7–32.2) 0.76
Noh 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
Prior operation within 30 days Yesc 26.8 (24.1–30.1) 0.19
Noi 27.9 (24.4–31.6)
ASA classification ASA 1 and 2f 27.3 (24.0–30.3) 0.01
ASA 3, 4 and 5g 28.1 (24.5–32.1)
Transfused more than 4 units pRBCs in 72 hours prior to surgery Yes 27.6 (22.2–30.4) 0.23
Noh 27.8 (24.4–31.5)
BMI (Unadjusted OR)
Age (per 10 year change in age)l −0.8 <0.01
Operative time (per min increaseh 3.8 <0.01
a

Missing=9

b

Missing=3

c

Missing=1

d

Missing=6

e

Missing=4

f

Missing=2

g

Missing=10

h

Missing=12

i

Missing=11

j

Missing=5

k

Missing=7

l

Missing=8

At least one complication occurred in 668 out of 1,213 patients (55.1%) patients within 30 days of RC for bladder cancer. On bivariable analysis, patients with albumin <3.5 g/dL had a significantly higher overall complication rate than those with pre-operative albumin >3.5 g/dL (67 vs 55%, p=0.03). Conversely, neither excessive pre-operative weight loss (65 vs 55% p=0.20) nor BMI (p=0.43) were associated with significantly increased complications. (Appendix Table I)

Examining specific types of complications, those patients with pre-operative albumin <3.5 g/dL were significantly more likely to have a respiratory complication (19 vs 6%, p<0.01) than patients with normal albumin. These patients were also more likely to have a cardiovascular complication; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (5 vs 2%, p=0.56) (Appendix Table IIa). No specific complications were significantly associated with excessive weight loss prior to surgery. (Appendix Table IIb) Increased BMI was significantly associated with superficial wound infection (p<0.01), wound dehiscence (p=0.01), renal insufficiency (p=0.01), and reoperation (p=0.05). Bleeding requiring transfusion was more common in patients with lower BMI (p=0.02). (Appendix Table IIc)

On multivariable logistic regression, only pre-operative serum albumin was a significant predictor of complications when adjusting for all other confounding variables (p=0.03) (Table IIa) These potentially influential variables (on bivariable analysis with p<0.2) included age (p=0.01), sex (p=0.02), resident presence in OR (p<0.01), year of operation (p<0.01), pre-operative smoking history (p=0.19), pre-operative pulmonary (p=0.10) or cardiac comorbidity (p=0.04), pre-operative acute renal failure (p=0.16), prior operation within 30 days (p=0.03), operative time (<0.01), ASA classification (p<0.01), and pre-operative blood transfusion (p=0.04). After adjusting for these variables, patients with albumin < 3.5 g/dL had almost twice the odds of having at least one complication compared to patients with serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dL prior to surgery (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.06, 3.03. p=0.03) (Table IIa). As a continuous variable, pre-operative serum albumin remained a significant predictor, with a 0.5 g/dL decrease resulting in 1.2 times the odds of least one complication (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.02, 1.40. p=0.02 per 0.5 g/dL decrease). (Table IIb) Neither pre-operative weight loss of >10% of body weight (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.44, 2.52, p=0.92) nor BMI (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98, 1.04, p=0.73) was significantly associated with increased post-operative complications after adjusting for confounding variables. (Table IIa)

Table 2a.

Predictors of overall complications following cystectomy for treating bladder cancer, with special emphasis on selected nutritional-dependent prognostic factors [albumin distribution dichotomized at 3.5]

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p-value*
Preoperative albumin < 3.5 Yes 1.79 (1.06, 3.03) 0.03
No Reference
Greater than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months Yes 1.05 (0.44, 2.52) 0.92
No Reference
BMI Per 1 unit increase 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) 0.73
*

After adjusting for significant variables on bivariable analysis (BMI, age, sex, resident presence in OR, year of operation, smoking history, pre-operative pulmonary and cardiac comorbidity, pre-operative acute renal failure, prior operation within 30 days, operative time, ASA classification, pre-operative blood transfusion). Remaining nutritional parameters were included in the multivariable model regardless of bivariable significance.

Table 2b.

Predictors of overall complications following cystectomy for treating bladder cancer, with special emphasis on selected nutritional-dependent prognostic factors [continuous albumin distribution]

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p-value*
Preoperative albumin Per 0.5 mg/dL decrease 1.20 (1.02, 1.40) 0.02
Greater than 10% loss in body weight in the last 6 months Yes 1.03 (0.43, 2.49) 0.94
No Reference
BMI Per 1 unit increase 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) 0.84
*

After adjusting for significant variables on bivariable analysis (BMI, age, sex, resident presence in OR, year of operation, smoking history, pre-operative pulmonary and cardiac comorbidity, pre-operative acute renal failure, prior operation within 30 days, operative time, ASA classification, pre-operative blood transfusion). Remaining nutritional parameters were included in the multivariable model regardless of bivariable significance.

Discussion

Our analysis of the NSQIP database demonstrates that patients with pre-operative albumin < 3.5 g/dL have nearly twice the risk of a complication within 30 days of RC for bladder cancer compared to patients with a normal albumin level. The predictive value of albumin remains significant on our sensitivity analysis as a continuous variable. Conversely, complications were not associated with BMI or weight loss >10% in 6 months prior to surgery. Lack of association for BMI and weight loss may be secondary to a homogeneous BMI range and small sample size, respectively.

With regard to albumin, our findings support two single institution retrospective reports that low pre-operative serum albumin predicts increased post-operative complications after RC.11,12 Lambert et al reported that patients with a serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL had a 22% greater overall complication rate compared to patients with a normal albumin (>3.5 g/dL), even when controlling for multiple covariates.11 However, their sample size was small (n = 187), and the study was not specifically designed to evaluate complications, which were therefore neither systematically nor prospectively ascertained. Garg et al also demonstrated that hypoalbuminemia significantly increased the risk of complications within 90 days of RC.12 Specifically, neurologic and wound complications occurred more frequently in patients with decreased pre-operative serum albumin, while other major complications, including cardiac, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, infectious, bleeding, pulmonary, and thromboembolic were not significantly associated. Despite a larger cohort (N=1097), this series included only patients from a single tertiary specialty oncology hospital.12

In contrast to these single institution studies, our study population is drawn from over 450 academic and community hospitals across the United States, expanding the external validity of the findings. Furthermore, neither study examined additional nutritional predictors of complications not addressed in previous reports.

Prior studies have also suggested the importance of serum albumin on mortality after RC. Gregg et al10, Lambert et al11, and Garg et al12 reported that pre-operative hypoalbuminemia significantly increased 90-day mortality after RC in their respective single institution, retrospective studies. Hollenbeck et al4 used a prior iteration of the Veterans Administration NSQIP dataset to demonstrate that patients undergoing RC with a pre-operative serum albumin < 3.5 gm/dL had 12 times the odds of 90 day mortality compared to those patients with a normal serum albumin.4

Malnutrition increases the risk of adverse surgical outcomes by impairing immune function16, contributing to sarcopenia and impaired muscle function16, delaying mobilization and impairing cardiopulmonary function.17,18 Interventions that ameliorate these pathophysiologic effects of malnutrition may reduce the risk of complications, readmissions and deaths after RC. Uncertainty remains whether delaying RC for pre-operative nutritional interventions may undermine the patient’s chance for cure from RC. Although the optimal timeframe from diagnosis of MIBC to RC is debated1921, some may be better served with pre-surgical optimization.

The premise for this recommendation is the assumption that pre-operative malnutrition is potentially modifiable, and improving nutrition status will improve outcomes after surgery. This notion is supported by the results of a large randomized clinical trial evaluating an individualized nutritional intervention during and after discharge from an acute hospitalization among a cohort of medical inpatients.22 The nutritional support intervention increased serum albumin levels and decreased mortality compared to the control group. Less optimistically however, Burden et al concluded that whether the benefits of pre-operative nutrition in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery outweigh the risks remains unclear.7 Further research is essential to determine the optimal patient population, route, and timing of pre-operative nutrition interventions.

Identifying RC candidates at risk for malnutrition who may benefit from perioperative nutrition support is required in order to improve surgical outcomes. This population is potentially substantial, as patients undergoing RC have several risk factors for malnutrition. The association between advanced age and risk of malnutrition is well established.23 The mean age of patients diagnosed with bladder cancer is 73 years24 and the mean age at the time of RC in two contemporary cohorts is 68 years.10,11 Greater than 40% of 2,538 patients undergoing RC in a nationwide Veterans Administration database between 1991 and 2002 were older than 70 years of age.4 Karl et al. demonstrated that age and malignant disease are independent risk factors for malnutrition among urologic inpatients in Germany.25 Two recent cohorts reported that 17–19% of bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy were nutritionally deficient as defined by serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL, BMI < 18.5, and/or unintentional pre-operative weight loss >5%.10,11 Importantly, using the validated Nutritional Risk Score screening tool13 to define patients at risk for malnutrition, up to 55% of patients undergoing RC are at high risk.26,27

Pre-operative screening has little benefit unless accompanied by a formal, systematic nutritional assessment to clearly define an intervention plan and subsequent follow up and reevaluation.28 At our institution, a registered dietician formally consults on all patients scheduled to undergo RC pre-operatively. Laboratory values, including albumin, pre-albumin, and C-reactive protein are obtained at the pre-operative visit. The goal of the nutrition consult is to assess risk and formulate an individualized plan for pre-operative nutrition supplementation, which may include carbohydrate loading and/or immunonutrition, if appropriate. On post-operative day 3, a follow up inpatient nutrition consult is obtained to reassess nutritional needs and create a personalized nutrition plan upon discharge. Follow up nutrition assessments occur on an outpatient basis (e.g. determining ongoing weight loss after discharge or impairment in wound healing) in coordination with post-operative visits and cancer surveillance appointments at an interval deemed appropriate by the nutritionist. Prospective collection of nutritional parameters, complications, readmission, and mortality is ongoing and will hopefully demonstrate an area for reproducible quality improvement.

Limitations of our study include the retrospective design, although the well validated, standardized, prospective nature by which perioperative outcomes are ascertained mitigate some of the measurement and recording bias inherent to retrospective studies. The NSQIP data file does not yet include clinicopathologic data, making it impossible to adjust for extent of disease in our multivariable analysis. Additionally, a large proportion of patients were missing pre-operative albumin data. Finally, gastrointestinal complications including ileus and small bowel obstruction, which are particularly relevant after RC are absent from the data file at the current time.

Our study demonstrates that decreased pre-operative serum albumin is an independent risk factor for complications after RC for bladder cancer. Though imperfect as a marker for malnutrition, serum albumin may be useful in pre-operative counseling and risk-stratification prior to RC. Additionally, serum albumin may be helpful in identifying patients who may benefit from pre-operative nutrition counseling and optimization.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Acknowledgments

no additional acknowledgements exist for this paper.

Details of all funding sources for work in question: The project described was supported by the University Cancer Research Fund and the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grants KL2TR001109 and UL1TR001111.

Footnotes

Ethical standards: the manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data. NSQIP data is completely de-identified.

Conflict of interest: No additional funding sources or conflicts of interest related to this publication are reported by any of the authors.

Authors’ contribution:

DC Johnson: Data analysis, manuscript writing/editing

SB Riggs: Manuscript writing/editing, project development

ME Nielsen: Manuscript editing, project development

JE Matthews: Data collection, management and analysis

ME Woods: Project development, Manuscript writing/editing

EM Wallen: Project development, Manuscript writing/editing

RS Pruthi: Project development, Manuscript writing/editing

AB Smith: Data collection and analysis, manuscript writing/editing, project development

References

  • 1.Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):164–174. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: Long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):666–675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stimson CJ, Chang SS, Barocas DA, et al. Early and late perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: 90-day readmissions, morbidity and mortality in a contemporary series. J Urol. 2010;184(4):1296–1300. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub DA, et al. The effects of adjusting for case mix on mortality and length of stay following radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1363–1368. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buzby GP, Mullen JL, Matthews DC, Hobbs CL, Rosato EF. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Surg. 1980;139(1):160–167. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90246-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gibbs J, Cull W, Henderson W, Daley J, Hur K, Khuri SF. Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: Results from the national VA surgical risk study. Arch Surg. 1999;134(1):36–42. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.1.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burden S, Todd C, Hill J, Lal S. Pre-operative nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD008879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008879.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Terry WJ, Bueschen AJ. Complications of radical cystectomy and correlation with nutritional assessment. Urology. 1986;27(3):229–232. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Svatek RS, Fisher MB, Williams MB, et al. Age and body mass index are independent risk factors for the development of postoperative paralytic ileus after radical cystectomy. Urology. 2010;76(6):1419–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gregg JR, Cookson MS, Phillips S, et al. Effect of preoperative nutritional deficiency on mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2011;185(1):90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lambert JW, Ingham M, Gibbs BB, Given RW, Lance RS, Riggs SB. Using preoperative albumin levels as a surrogate marker for outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. 2013;81(3):587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garg T, Chen LY, Kim PH, Zhao PT, Herr HW, Donat SM. Preoperative serum albumin is associated with mortality and complications after radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2013 doi: 10.1111/bju.12405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mueller C, Compher C, Ellen DM, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: Nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(1):16–24. doi: 10.1177/0148607110389335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Slattery E, Patchett S. Albumin as a marker of nutrition: A common pitfall. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):667–8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318230646a. author reply 668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: The american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251–267. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsai S. Importance of lean body mass in the oncologic patient. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(5):593–598. doi: 10.1177/0884533612457949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arora NS, Rochester DF. Respiratory muscle strength and maximal voluntary ventilation in undernourished patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126(1):5–8. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heymsfield SB, Bethel RA, Ansley JD, Gibbs DM, Felner JM, Nutter DO. Cardiac abnormalities in cachectic patients before and during nutritional repletion. Am Heart J. 1978;95(5):584–594. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(78)90300-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nielsen ME, Palapattu GS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. A delay in radical cystectomy of >3 months is not associated with a worse clinical outcome. BJU Int. 2007;100(5):1015–1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kulkarni GS, Urbach DR, Austin PC, Fleshner NE, Laupacis A. Longer wait times increase overall mortality in patients with bladder cancer. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1318–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gore JL, Lai J, Setodji CM, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project Mortality increases when radical cystectomy is delayed more than 12 weeks: Results from a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare analysis. Cancer. 2009;115(5):988–996. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Feldblum I, German L, Castel H, Harman-Boehm I, Shahar DR. Individualized nutritional intervention during and after hospitalization: The nutrition intervention study clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(1):10–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Lonterman-Monasch S, de Vries OJ, Danner SA, Kramer MH, Muller M. Prevalence and determinants for malnutrition in geriatric outpatients. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(6):1007–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Howlader Noone A, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2010. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010. Updated based on November 2012 SEER data submission.
  • 25.Karl A, Rittler P, Buchner A, et al. Prospective assessment of malnutrition in urologic patients. Urology. 2009;73(5):1072–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Roth B, Birkhauser FD, Zehnder P, et al. Parenteral nutrition does not improve postoperative recovery from radical cystectomy: Results of a prospective randomised trial. Eur Urol. 2013;63(3):475–482. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Hubner M, Iglesias K, Vaucher L, Jichlinski P. Are patients at nutritional risk more prone to complications after major urological surgery? J Urol. 2013;190(6):2126–2132. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huhmann MB, August DA. Perioperative nutrition support in cancer patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(5):586–592. doi: 10.1177/0884533612455203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES