Skip to main content
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India logoLink to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
. 2016 Jul 1;66(Suppl 1):573–577. doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0921-z

“The Jelly Belly”: Diagnostic Dilemmas and Current Concepts

Priyanka Punit Kedia 1,, Gayatri Ravikumar 1, Suravi Mohanty 1, Julian Crasta 1, Elizabeth Vallikad 2
PMCID: PMC5016483  PMID: 27651663

Abstract

Background

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare and poorly understood clinicopathological entity characterized by gelatinous ascites with neoplastic or non-neoplastic mucinous implants in the peritoneum. Although its origin was debated, current evidence in literature favours the appendix as the origin of the disease, over the ovaries. The changing terminologies in the classification of this entity pose diagnostic and management challenges.

Case Reports

Herein, we report three cases of PMP in postmenopausal women, their clinical presentation, pathological staging based on the peritoneal tumor deposits and the treatment administered. Two patients recovered uneventfully, while one had recurrence of adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion

The rarity of this disease and the diagnostic challenges associated with it are discussed with an emphasis on the current concepts in its origin and management. Appropriate classification and complete removal of the tumor is mandated to prevent disease-related mortality.

Keywords: Pseudomyxoma peritonei, Origin, Classification, Diagnosis, Management

Introduction

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an enigmatic intra-abdominal disease characterized by epithelial implants secreting extracellular mucin resulting in dissecting gelatinous ascites [1]. PMP is a clinical terminology rather than a pathological diagnosis. The primary neoplasms producing PMP may be benign or malignant and their origin has been debated, until recent studies have attributed it to primary appendiceal mucinous neoplasms [24]. It may also originate from other mucinous neoplasms throughout the gastrointestinal tract [5]. The ovaries usually represent secondary involvement. The pathological diagnosis and classification of PMP has posed much debate. It was classified into disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM) and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA) based on cellularity, epithelial atypia and mitotic activity which presented much subjective ambiguity [6, 7]. According to the current AJCC and WHO classification, any neoplastic mucinous epithelium in the appendiceal wall and beyond is a mucinous adenocarcinoma. This can be further classified as invasive, low grade or high grade, based on the WHO AJCC 2010 classification [6]. The treatment options range from cytoreductive surgery to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with varied prognosis [7, 8].

Case Reports

Case 1

A 75-year female presented with abdominal distension and loss of appetite for 2 months. On ultrasonography, a large, multiloculated cystic lesion measuring 15 × 12 × 16 cm was noted in the pelvis. Investigations revealed an elevated CEA (923 ng/ml) and mildly elevated CA 125 (51 U/ml). Intraoperatively, the peritoneal cavity was filled with gelatinous material, a large mucinous tumor (with ruptured capsule) replacing the left ovary and an enlarged appendix. Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, retro peritoneal lymph node dissection was done along with appendectomy. The samples were sent for histopathological examination.

Histopathology of the left ovarian mass revealed a mucinous tumor with borderline features composed of multiple mucin filled cysts lined by multilayered mucinous epithelium. There was no evidence of atypia or invasion. The intervening fibroblastic stroma showed dissecting pools of mucin (Fig. 1). The right ovary was atrophic. The cut surface of the appendix revealed mucinous material. The sections of the appendix revealed a mucinous neoplasm with minimal atypia. The mucin was dissecting between muscularis propria and extending up to the serosa, suggestive of rupture (Fig. 2). The omentum showed mucin pools with scanty epithelial fragments (Fig. 3). Hence, a diagnosis of low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma of the omentum, secondary to a low-grade mucinous neoplasm of the appendix along with borderline mucinous tumor of the left ovary, was rendered. This was called diffuse peritoneal adenomucinosis of appendiceal origin, according to the earlier classification by Ronnett et al. The retroperitoneal lymph nodes showed no metastasis. The uterine cervix, endometrium and right ovary showed no mucin, although the parametria, serosal aspect of the uterus and right fallopian tube showed mucoid material with inflammation. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was put on adjuvant chemotherapy.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Ovary showing a mucinous tumor with borderline features and multilayered mucin-secreting epithelial cells

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Appendix showing a low-grade mucinous neoplasm with mucin dissecting through the muscularis propria

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Mucin pools dissecting through the omentum with low-grade neoplastic epithelial cells

Case 2

A 54-year female presented with loss of appetite and abdominal distension. Ultrasonogram revealed bilateral ovarian cystic masses. Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and omentectomy was performed after an intraoperative frozen section biopsy which revealed borderline mucinous ovarian tumors of both ovaries. The omentum and uterine serosa had mucinous deposits with epithelial cells. This was consistent with a diagnosis of PMP. A history of appendectomy was not recovered from the medical records, nor was the specimen of appendix received; therefore, the status of the appendix was unknown. The patient returned 2 years later with abdominal distension, deposits on the intestinal wall, highly suspicious for a recurrent malignancy. The deposits were sent for histopathological analysis which showed a high-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma. On immunohistochemistry, the epithelial cells displayed diffuse strong positivity for CK 20 and focal positivity for CK7 supporting gastrointestinal origin as the primary.

Case 3

A 44-year female patient presented with abdominal discomfort and severe backache since 3 months. Blood investigations revealed elevated CEA (153 ng/ml) and CA125 (94 U/ml). Radiological investigations showed a large, well-defined, multiloculated, cystic lesion with internal septations arising from the pelvis and extending intra-abdominally with free fluid in the abdomen and multiple omental nodules. Intraoperatively, there was a right adnexal mucinous tumor with breached capsule (Fig. 4). The appendix had a ruptured base and was distended with mucinous material (Fig. 5). Multiple peritoneal mucinous deposits were present in the greater and lesser omentum, liver, lesser sac and hilum of spleen, the largest deposit measuring 3 × 4 cm. Surgical debulking was done with residual disease of about 2 cm in greatest dimension, around the liver and inferior vena cava. Histopathology analysis revealed a mucinous neoplasm of the right ovary and mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix, both with evidence of rupture. Peritoneal deposits with dissecting mucin and islands of benign mucinous epithelium compatible with a diagnosis of DPAM (Ronnett [3]) and low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix (AJCC/WHO [6]). The patient is on adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Ovary showing a mucinous tumor with capsular breach

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Cut surface of the distended appendix showing mucinous material. Inset appendix distended with mucin before sectioning

The clinicopathological characteristics of the three patients are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characterization of the three patients with PMP

Case and year of diagnosis Age in years Symptoms Histopath of ovary Appendix status Peritoneum Treatment Tumor recurred Ronnett (1995) WHO AJCC (2010)
1. 2009 75 Abdominal distension
Loss of appetite
Mucinous tumor with borderline features, left ovary Low-grade mucinous neoplasm Mucin with low-grade epithelium Surgical Debulking No DPAM Low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma
2. 2001 54 Loss of appetite
Abdominal distension
Borderline mucinous cystadenoma, bilateral ovaries Not known Mucin with low-grade epithelium Surgical Debulking Yes, in 2003, metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma deposits on intestinal wall PMCA High-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma
3. 2013 44 Abdominal discomfort
Severe backache
Mucinous neoplasm right ovary with evidence of Pseudomyxoma ovarii Mucinous cystadenoma Dissecting mucin with islands of benign mucinous neoplasm Surgical Debulking and postoperative chemotherapy No DPAM Low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma

Discussion

PMP is a diagnostically challenging disease with poor response to chemotherapy and frequent recurrences [7, 8]. The term introduced by Werth [1], meaning a “false mucinous tumor of the peritoneum,” is characterized by mucinous ascites with peritoneal and omental neoplastic implants. It is discovered incidentally intraoperatively in about 1 in 10,000 laparotomies [9]. The origin of PMP was much debated due to the involvement of both ovaries and appendix in a majority of female patients, but the appendiceal origin of most PMPs is undoubtedly confirmed [24]. Firstly, as most studies involved a fraction of male patients who developed PMP and in females, the ovarian involvement was usually right-sided in the vicinity of the appendix or bilateral. One of our cases was right-sided, one was bilateral and one was left-sided but with an atrophic right ovary suggesting the possibility of mucinous degeneration/postrupture atrophy of the right ovary. Secondly, immunohistochemical evidence proves that the peritoneal tumor and ovarian tumors had an immunoprofile similar to that of appendiceal mucinous tumors. A study revealed that expression of CK7, CK 18, CK 20, CEA, HAM-56 of the ovarian neoplasms with PMP was similar to the appendiceal tumors but were unlike the control group of ovarian mucinous tumors without PMP [10]. Further studies show that the extracellular mucin-secreting goblet cells in PMP express MUC-2 which is similarly expressed by mucinous tumors of the appendix further supporting an appendiceal origin [11]. Molecular analysis of the neoplastic cells demonstrated identical K-ras mutations in both the ovarian and appendiceal neoplasms. Further, loss of heterozygosity occurred in both the appendiceal and ovarian neoplasms in all cases except for one where there was preservation of both alleles in the appendix [12, 13]. This was attributed to a loss of heterozygosity as a part of tumor progression by the ovaries. Appendiceal primaries can be neoplastic or non-neoplastic [6]. Ovarian involvement is usually secondary.

PMP was originally classified by Ronnett et al. as DPAM and PMCA [69]. It is currently classified as mucinous adenocarcinoma: low grade and high grade (WHO and AJCC 2010) [6] (Table 2).

Table 2.

Classification of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei [6]

Ronnett et al. [3] AJCC and WHO [6]
Tumor confined to appendix
 Limited to mucosa NA Adenoma
 Low-grade/high-grade cytology NA Adenoma
 Positive surgical margin NA Adenoma
 Neoplastic epithelium in appendix wall NA Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma
Tumor beyond appendix
 Low-grade epithelium in peritoneal mucin Disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM) Low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma
 High-grade epithelium in peritoneal mucin Peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA) High-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma

Prognostication is based on the following factors:

  1. Histological type [4, 6, 7, 14] with low-grade tumors (DPAM according to older classification) having a better prognosis than high-grade tumors (PMCA).

  2. Completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) score [7, 8], i.e., removal of all gross disease, as assessed by Chua et al. study [15]. When no residual disease remained, the CCR score was 0. When no nodule >2.5 mm in diameter remained, score 1 was assigned. When gross residual disease remained, it was score 2 or 3. The 5-year overall survival revealed patients with CCR score 0 had significantly better disease-free survival.

Surgical debulking remains the main stay of treatment with role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) being assessed in terms of morbidity, mortality, efficacy and long-term survival [7, 8, 16, 17].

Conclusion

PMP still remains a difficult disease entity to diagnose both clinically and histopathologically. With recent evidences in the literature suggesting appendiceal origin for PMP, a thorough search should be made and appendix removed for histopathological examination in all cases of PMP. Although the grade of malignancy can be assessed on hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides, the immunohistochemical origin confirmation with markers specific to appendix should be attempted wherever feasible. Appropriate classification with the recent terminology proposed by AJCC/WHO is mandated to get uniformity in disease classification across the globe. Although the role of HIPEC in disease management is controversial, an attempt at complete removal of the tumor to achieve CCR score 0 is mandated to prevent disease-related mortality.

Dr. Priyanka Punit Kedia

completed her MD in Pathology in St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore. She passed out in 2015 obtaining a university rank. She is currently residing in California, USA, where she is honing her skills in Dermatopathology and Molecular pathology.graphic file with name 13224_2016_921_Figa_HTML.jpg

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Footnotes

Priyanka Punit Kedia, MD, is a postgraduate student in the Department of Pathology at St. John’s Medical College; Gayatri Ravikumar, MD, is a Assistant Professor in the Department of Pathology at St. John’s Medical College; Suravi Mohanty, DCP, DNB, is a Assistant Professor in the Department of Pathology at St. John’s Medical College; Julian Crasta, MD, DNB, is a Professor in the Department of Pathology at St. John’s Medical College; and Elizabeth Vallikad, MD, PhD, is a Professor and Head in the Department of Gynecologic Oncology at St. John’s Medical College.

References

  • 1.Werth R. Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1884;24:100–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buell-Gutbrod R, Gwin K. Pathologic diagnosis, origin, and natural history of pseudomyxoma peritonei. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013;33:221–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ, Zahn CM, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei in women: a clinicopathologic analysis of 30 cases with emphasis on site of origin, prognosis, and relationship to ovarian mucinous tumors of low malignant potential. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:509–524. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90247-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carr NJ, Finch J, Ilesley IC, et al. Pathology and prognosis in pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of 274 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(10):919–923. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.de Bree E, Witkamp A, Van De Vijver M, et al. Unusual origins of Pseudomyxoma peritonei. J Surg Oncol. 2000;75:270–274. doi: 10.1002/1096-9098(200012)75:4<270::AID-JSO9>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Panarelli NC, Yantiss RK. Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix and peritoneum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(10):1261–1268. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0034-RA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nakakura EK. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: more questions than answers. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2429–2430. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Stewart JH, 4th, et al. Current status and future directions in appendiceal cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(4):599–609. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Harshen R, Jyothirmayi R, Mithal N. Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2003;15(2):73–77. doi: 10.1053/clon.2002.0163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ronnett BM, Shmookler BM, Diener-West M. Immunohistochemical evidence supporting the appendiceal origin of pseudomyxoma peritonei in women. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16:1–9. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199701000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O’Connell JT, Hacker CM, Barsky SH. MUC2 is a molecular marker for pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(9):958–972. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000026617.52466.9F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alakus H, Babicky ML, Ghosh P, et al. Genome-wide mutational landscape of mucinous carcinomatosis peritonei of appendiceal origin. Genome Med. 2014;6(5):43. doi: 10.1186/gm559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Noguchi R, Yano H, Gohda Y, et al. Molecular profiles of high-grade and low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei. Cancer Med. 2015;4(12):1809–1816. doi: 10.1002/cam4.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Misdraji J. Mucinous epithelial neoplasms of the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(Suppl 1):S67–S79. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chua TC, Moran BJ, Sugarbaker PH, et al. Early- and long-term outcome data of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendiceal origin treated by a strategy of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2449–2456. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lord AC, Shihab O, Chandrakumaran K, et al. Recurrence and outcome after complete tumour removal and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 512 patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from perforated appendiceal mucinous tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(3):396–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.08.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McBride K, McFadden D, Osler T. Improved survival of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cytoreductive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2013;183:246–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES