Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1993 Nov;46(11):989–992. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.11.989

Use of histopathology services by general practitioners: recent changes in referral practice.

K Shorrock 1
PMCID: PMC501678  PMID: 8254104

Abstract

AIMS--To determine the nature and magnitude of the histopathological workload generated by specimens received from general practitioners and to assess the trends in referral practice. METHODS--All material submitted by general practitioners to the Leicester district histopathology service from 1989 to January 1993 was identified from departmental records. All GP referrals from October to December 1992 were also analysed. Total numbers of referrals from all sources were used for comparison. Specimens were also analysed according to diagnostic categories. RESULTS--There has been a progressive rise, both in the absolute number and the proportion of specimens relative to other surgical specimens submitted by GPs. Most are skin biopsy specimens. There were clear changes over the study period in the relative proportion of different types of lesions received, with a substantial increase in samples of benign naevi and papillomas. There was some evidence of a corresponding decrease in the number of these lesions submitted by hospital practitioners. The number of malignant skin tumours from GPs was small and the proportion had not increased over the study period. CONCLUSIONS--Histopathological workload generated by GPs is increasing but it still represents a small proportion of the total. The major increase is in benign skin lesions.

Full text

PDF
989

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown J. S. Minor operations in general practice. Br Med J. 1979 Jun 16;1(6178):1609–1610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6178.1609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox N. H., Wagstaff R., Popple A. W. Using clinicopathological analysis of general practitioner skin surgery to determine educational requirements and guidelines. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):93–96. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Galloway M., Senadhira A. Labs take the strain. Health Serv J. 1990 Jul 12;100(5209):1037–1037. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Godfrey E., Watkiss M., Schnieden H. Initiation and evaluation of a pilot scheme for minor surgery in general practice. Health Trends. 1990;22(2):57–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herd R. M., Hunter J. A., McLaren K. M., Chetty U., Watson A. C., Gollock J. M. Excision biopsy of malignant melanoma by general practitioners in south east Scotland 1982-91. BMJ. 1992 Dec 12;305(6867):1476–1478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6867.1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hillan K. J., Johnson C. P., Morton R. Effect of general practitioner contract on referral of specimens for histological examination. BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1180–1180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6811.1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McWilliam L. J., Knox F., Wilkinson N., Oogarah P. Performance of skin biopsies by general practitioners. BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1177–1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6811.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Milne R. Minor surgery in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 May;40(334):175–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Performance of skin biopsies by general practitioners. BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1472–1474. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Slater D. Screening and the 1990 contract. BMJ. 1990 Apr 21;300(6731):1074–1074. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6731.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES