Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Sep 9;6:33172. doi: 10.1038/srep33172

In Vivo Characterization of ARN14140, a Memantine/Galantamine-Based Multi-Target Compound for Alzheimer’s Disease

Angelo M Reggiani 1, Elena Simoni 2, Roberta Caporaso 2, Johann Meunier 3, Emeline Keller 3, Tangui Maurice 3,4,5,6, Anna Minarini 2, Michela Rosini 2, Andrea Cavalli 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC5016838  PMID: 27609215

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic pathological condition that leads to neurodegeneration, loss of intellectual abilities, including cognition and memory, and ultimately to death. It is widely recognized that AD is a multifactorial disease, where different pathological cascades (mainly amyloid and tau) contribute to neural death and to the clinical outcome related to the disease. The currently available drugs for AD were developed according to the one-target, one-drug paradigm. In recent times, multi-target strategies have begun to play an increasingly central role in the discovery of more efficacious candidates for complex neurological conditions, including AD. In this study, we report on the in vivo pharmacological characterization of ARN14140, a new chemical entity, which was obtained through a multi-target structure-activity relationship campaign, and which showed a balanced inhibiting profile against the acetylcholinesterase enzyme and the NMDA receptor. Based on the initial promising biochemical data, ARN14140 is here studied in mice treated with the amyloidogenic fragment 25–35 of the amyloid-β peptide, a consolidated non-transgenic AD model. Sub-chronically treating animals with ARN14140 leads to a prevention of the cognitive impairment and of biomarker levels connected to neurodegeneration, demonstrating its neuroprotective potential as new AD agent.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by a progressive decline in memory and cognition, leading to loss of body functions and ultimately to death. AD’s etiopathology is largely unknown, although it is widely accepted that the disease is multifactorial, involving parallel and sequential pathological cascades1,2. In recent years, two major pathways have been reported to be highly involved in disease development: i) the extracellular aggregation of the amyloid beta peptide in protofibrils, fibrils, and plaques, and ii) the intracellular hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein, which is subsequently detached from microtubules with consequent neuronal death3,4. Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, with subsequent activation of glial cells, have also been reported to play a role, likely downstream, in AD-associated neurodegeneration5,6.

Because of its complexity, AD is the source of a major unmet medical need in neurology7,8. In response to this pluralism of causes and effects, one possible research strategy is to develop a multi-target approach, leading to a single molecule acting in concert on different targets of relevance for the disease. This should allow to gain a superior therapeutic profile, relative to single-target molecules alone, and to overcome the intrinsic conflict of combination therapies, where positive outcomes deriving from combating the disease on multiple fronts coexist with drug-drug interaction concerns9. We recently developed a novel class of multi-target compounds, obtained by linking together two commercially available drugs for AD, galantamine and memantine. These drugs modulate the cholinergic and glutamatergic pathways, respectively10,11. ARN14140 was the endpoint of a mid-sized campaign of dual-target structure-activity relationship (SARs) studies. ARN14140 was the best compromise between pharmacological potency, molecular weight, and calculated logP. When tested in vitro, ARN14140 showed a fairly balanced profile against both targets. It was almost equipotent for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and the NMDA receptor (NMDAR, Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 2D structure of ARN14140 (MW = 506.73) along with biological activities values against AChE and NMDAR as reported in Simoni et al.10.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

To investigate the effects of ARN14140 in a functional context, we used the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of oligomeric amyloid beta peptide 25–35 (Aβ25-35) in mice as a rapid, standardized pharmacological model of AD toxicity, which mimics both the cognitive impairment and the associated cellular neurodegeneration12,13,14,15,16,17. Preliminary pharmacokinetic and brain penetration data showed that the compound has a suboptimal profile possibly due to a preferred compound accumulation in the liver (data not shown). To allow brain penetration ARN14140 was given by i.c.v. delivery through osmotic mini pumps providing a continuous flow to interact with the targets. After Aβ25-35 intoxication, ARN14140 was delivered for 7 days, releasing an estimated concentration of 12 μM during the treatment. Protection against Aβ25-35 neurotoxicity was assessed either behaviorally (spontaneous alternation and passive avoidance) or biochemically (measures of key markers of inflammation and cell integrity).

Results

Neurodegeneration was induced by i.c.v. injection of Aβ25-35. ARN14140 was introduced into the lateral ventricle in mice for 7 days of chronic infusion through an Alzet mini pumps implant. To guarantee full coverage for the entire infusion period, compound doses (2.5 and 7.5 μg/day for 7 days) were selected based on the in vitro potency of the molecule on both targets. Since the molecular weight of ARN14140 is 506.73, we estimated a constant concentration of the compound of almost 12 μM. This value was about 6 fold higher than the Ki for the NMDA receptor (2.3 μM) and 17 fold higher than the IC50 for the AChE enzyme (0.7 μM). Measurements were taken 7–9 days later.

Behavioral readouts included two complementary procedures to assess memory functions. We measured the following biomarkers of neuronal function and integrity: i) hippocampal lipid peroxidation as a cell integrity marker; ii) hippocampal TNFα as a neuroinflammation marker; iii) hippocampal Synaptophysin (Syn) as a synaptic integrity marker. We also looked at Bax and Bcl-2, two proteins involved in apoptotic pathways. Finally, we examined brain tissue integrity to quantify the damage in hippocampal pyramidal cell layers CA1. We assessed the cholinergic loss by immunolabeling of vesicular ACh transporter (VAChT) in cortex, nucleus basalis magnocellularis (Meynert), and hippocampal formation.

Behavioral tests

Figure 2 reports the effect of ARN14140 on Aβ25-35-induced spontaneous alternation deficits in mice during the 7 days. Treatment with Aβ25-35 induced significant spontaneous alternation deficits when compared to Sc.Aβ (Fig. 2a). ARN14140 dose-dependently reduced the Aβ25-35-induced memory deficits with full effect at a dose of 7.5 μg/day. Conversely, treatments did not affect total arm entries as reported in Fig. 2b.

Figure 2. Effects of ARN14140 infusion for 7 days on Aβ25-35-induced spontaneous alternation deficits in mice.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

V, vehicle solution. N = 11–12 per group. ANOVA: F(3,45) = 20.1, p < 0.0001 in (a), F(3,45) = 1.22, p > 0.05 in (b). ***p < 0.001 vs. the Sc.Aβ/V-treated group; ###p < 0.001 vs. the Aβ25-35/V-treated group; Dunnett’s test in (a). Effects of ARN14140 infusion for 7 days on Aβ25-35-induced passive avoidance deficits in mice. (c) Step-through latency and (d) escape latency measured during the retention session. V, vehicle solution. Data show median and interquartile range (25–75%). N = 11–12 per group. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA: H = 22.8, p < 0.001 in (c), H = 20.3, P < 0.001 in (d), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. the Sc.Aβ/V-treated group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the Aβ25-35/V-treated group; Dunn’s test in (c,d).

Figure 2 also reports the results of the passive avoidance test. Figure 2c shows that, with respect to untreated mice or those treated with Sc.Aβ, the Aβ25-35 treatment induced highly significant deficits in mice performance both as step-through latency and as escape latency during the retention session (Fig. 2c,d, respectively). Treatment with ARN14140 before training dose-dependently reduced the Aβ25-35-induced deficits, with significant prevention at a dose of 7.5 μg/day on both parameters (Fig. 2c,d). The ARN14140 effect was not associated with the typical NMDAR antagonist drawbacks such as increased step-through latency or lower shock sensitivity (data not shown).

In summary, the present findings indicate that chronic infusion of ARN14140 in the lateral ventricles fully protects mice from the development of short-term memory deficits after i.c.v. injection of Aβ25-35. Since the Y-maze performance mimics spatial learning and is driven at the hippocampal level, it can be concluded that ARN14140 provides a functional neuroprotective effect for this type of memory. ARN14140 was also effective in the passive avoidance test, which is a fear-motivated test classically used to assess short or long-term memory. Therefore, the data also suggest ARN14140 has an effect on this type of short-term memory. Both memory types are typically affected in AD patients18.

Biochemical analyses

We then analyzed the effect of ARN14140 on specific markers related to neurodegeneration to assess whether the functional neuroprotection seen behaviorally could be associated with a cellular neuroprotection.

First, we studied lipid peroxidation, a well-known marker of oxidative stress, which is associated with neurodegenerative diseases19,20. As shown in Fig. 3a, treatment with Aβ25-35 induced a highly significant increase in lipid peroxidation in mouse hippocampus compared to Sc.Aβ/V-injected mice. ARN14140 infusion significantly prevented the Aβ25-35-induced increase of lipid peroxidation. The effect of ARN14140 was complete at 7.5 μg/day, suggesting that, at this dose, the compound fully reverses the Aβ25-35-induced neuronal oxidative damage.

Figure 3. Effects of ARN14140 infusion for 7 days on Aβ25-35-induced toxicity.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Increase in lipid peroxidation in the mouse hippocampus. ANOVA: F(3,22) = 52.2, p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001 vs. the Sc.Aβ/V-treated group; ###p < 0.001 vs. the Aβ25-35/V-treated group; Dunnett’s test (b) increase in TNFα levels in the mouse hippocampus. ANOVA: F(3,22) = 2.47, p > 0.05. Note that a Dunnett’s test between the Sc.Aβ- and Aβ25-35-treated groups led to a significant (p < 0.05) difference (c) decrease of synaptophysin level in the mouse hippocampus. ANOVA: F(3,22) = 9.15, p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs Sc.Aβ/V, ##p < 0.01 vs Aβ25-35/V; Dunnett’s test. V, vehicle solution. N = 5–7 per group.

AD has been associated with activation of inflammatory pathways including the hyper secretion of pro-inflammatory, neurotoxic cytokines such as TNFα by reactive microglia and monocytes21.

As shown in Fig. 3b, after treatment with Aβ25-35, the hippocampal content of TNFα increased compared to ScAβ-injected mice (+89% increase, p < 0.05 using a two-column test, red bar vs. empty bar). As reported in the same figure, continuous i.c.v. infusion of ARN14140 for 7 days tended to prevent the increase in TNFα levels, although the ANOVA failed to reach significance, a similar attenuation was noted with both regimens, 2.5 and 7.5 μg/day. Since TNFα is thought to be part of the initiation mechanism of immune-mediated neurotoxic inflammation22, the data suggest that ARN14140 can possibly provide protection against AD-related inflammatory events.

We then investigated the Synaptophysin expression in hippocampus. Syn is a 38 kDa protein, present in virtually all neurons, which participates in synaptic transmission. Reduction of Syn is an index of synaptic function and many reports suggest that Syn levels are lowered by neurodegeneration23,24.

In our study, treatment with Aβ25-35 induced a highly significant decrease of hippocampal Synaptophysin content (−34%) as compared to Sc.Aβ-injected mice (cfr white bar with red bar in Fig. 3c). At a dose of 7.5 μg/day, ARN14140 significantly prevented the Aβ25-35-induced decrease in Syn in hippocampus, indicating that, at the top dose, ARN14140 can fully protect synaptic function.

Lastly, we focused on the Bcl-2 protein family. An increase of apoptotic cell death has been reported in the brain tissue of AD patients25,26. This event has been associated with a dysregulation of the Bcl-2 proteins balance. The Bcl-2 proteins are a family of evolutionarily related proteins mainly involved in regulating programmed cell death (apoptosis). Bax is the most studied member of the family and has pro-apoptotic activity, while Bcl-2 itself is the most investigated family member with anti-apoptotic activity.

As reported in Fig. 4a, Aβ25-35 administration induced a highly significant increase (+90%) in hippocampal Bax content compared to Sc.Aβ-injected mice. This translates into a highly significant increase (+85%) of Bax/Bcl-2 ratio relative to Sc.Aβ-injected mice (Fig. 4b).

Figure 4. Effect of ARN14140 infusion for 7 days on Aβ25-35-induced toxicity.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Bax level in the mouse hippocampus; (b) Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in the mouse hippocampus. V, vehicle solution. N = 5–7 per group in (a,b), ANOVA: F(3,22) = 12.9, p < 0.0001 in (a), F(3,22) = 9.13, p < 0.0001 in (b), ***p < 0.001 vs. Sc.Aβ/V, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. Aβ25–35/V; Dunnett’s test. Note that Bcl-2 levels did not differ among groups (F(3,22) = 0.04, p > 0.05).

The continuous infusion of ARN14140 for 7 days dose-dependently reduced the increase in Bax content in mouse hippocampus and rebalanced the altered Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (see Fig. 4a,b). In this study, both doses led to a significant effect although the max was observed with the top dose.

In summary, it has been reported that Aβ peptide affect Bax and Bcl-2 expression levels in AD human neurons27. Our findings indicate that ARN14140 can rebalance these mechanisms through which can possibly reduce AD-associated apoptosis.

Morphological alterations

We studied the neuroprotective potential of ARN14140 at a cellular level by evaluating its effect on Aβ25-35 induced CA1 mouse hippocampus cell loss. Cresyl violet was used as a vital stain and a significant decrease in cell count was observed in Aβ25-35 treated mice 9 days after i.c.v. injection of the peptides (Fig. 5a,b). The continuous infusion of ARN14140 treatment dose-dependently prevented the effect in viable cells, with a significant difference when compared to the Aβ25-35/V-treated group at a dose of 7.5 μg/day (Fig. 5c).

Figure 5. Effects of ARN14140 infusion for 7 days on Aβ25-35-induced decrease in viable pyramidal cells in the CA1 layer of the mouse hippocampus.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Typical CA1 field in zone c; (b) typical CA1 field in zone b; (c) quantification including zones a–c. V, vehicle solution. N = 10–11 animals per group, with 3 areas counted per animal. ANOVA: F(3,40) = 3.01, p < 0.05, *p < 0.05 vs. Sc.Aβ/V, #p < 0.05 vs. Aβ25-35/V; Dunnett’s test. Scale bar = 50 μm in (a,b).

We then analyzed the acetylcholine marker in different samples. VAChT was stained. VAChT is responsible for loading into neuronal endings ready for secretion. A decrease in VAChT indicates less acetylcholine, most likely due to loss of cholinergic neurons. The qualitative analysis of immunolabeling of VAChT showed large immunoreactive fibers in the hippocampus especially in the CA3 area (see Fig. 6a) and a more punctae labeling in the different cortex layers of Sc.Aβ/V-treated animals (Fig. 6b). In Aβ25-35-treated mice, a net decrease in immunolabeling was observed (Fig. 6c,d), which could be attributed to the small loss of neurons measured in the hippocampus.

Figure 6. Immunohistochemical staining of VAChT in Aβ25-35-treated mouse.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Hippocampus (a,c) and cortex (b,d) CA3 field in: (a,b) Sc.Aβ/V-treated mouse and (c,d) Aβ25-35/V-treated mouse. Cholinergic nerve terminals were pointed out on the figures by arrowheads and cholinergic punctae labeling by arrows. Hippocampus (e,g) and cortex (f,h) CA3 field in: (e,f) Aβ25-35/ARN14140 (2.5)-treated mouse and (g,h) Aβ25-35/ARN14140 (7.5)-treated mouse. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Poor brain integrity due to the chronic implantation of the pump meant that drug analysis could only be done on qualitative bases (marked glial injury, with high variability among mice). Nonetheless a clear trend of increased density of cholinergic terminals was observed in those mice receiving ARN14140. The effect was detectable at the high dose with an intense labeling of cholinergic terminals in the hippocampus and cortex, as pointed out in Fig. 6g,h.

Our morphological findings confirm at a cellular level that ARN14140 infusion had a beneficial effect on development of neurotoxicity. The effect on CA1 hippocampal cell loss was clear and quantitative, allowing in turn a quantitative analysis of the trend of cholinergic markers.

Discussion

AD is a complex and multifactorial disease whose causes are still partially unknown. It is widely accepted that AD is associated with a series of concomitant biochemical events that contribute to the pathophysiology of the disease. In the search for more effective therapeutic approaches to AD, an emerging option is to design multi-target molecules. The concept is that multi-target molecules can act at several levels of the AD-related neurodegenerative cascade/s28 at the same time. This should provide a profile with greater therapeutic benefits and reduced side effects, compared to single-target compounds.

Pursuing this line of research, we recently designed a novel class of multi-target molecule: dual NMDAR/AChE inhibitors. As starting scaffolds, we used two well-known currently available drugs, galantamine and memantine. We “linked” them into a single compound to form a new class of molecules acting on both targets at the same time. Galantamine was chosen because of its intrinsic dual mechanism of action as an anticholinesterase inhibitor (potentiation of endogenous ACh content) and allosteric modulator of neuronal nicotinic receptors (increase of glutamate levels)29,30. Memantine was chosen because of its reduced NMDA-related side effects, which may be due to its selective interaction with extrasynaptic NMDAR (selective blockade of extrasynaptic NMDAR does not affect the postsynaptic NMDAR, which is believed to mediate the beneficial glutamate effects in the CNS)31.

ARN14140 was the best representative of this new chemical class, which has been the subject of an international PCT patent application (WO2013160728A1).

Based on the initial biochemical characterization, which has already been published10, ARN14140 was chosen because it is a fairly balanced molecule. It interacts equally with the AChE enzyme and the NMDA receptor. In this study, the molecule was tested for its ability to prevent the biochemical and behavioral detrimental effects of the i.c.v. injection of Aβ25-35. The model is thought to mimic some key phenotypes of AD (mainly cognitive/memory impairment and neurodegeneration), and has already been used to determine neuroprotective effect of galantamine and memantine alone32,33.

In the present study, ARN14140 was given i.c.v. to minimize all possible issues of brain penetration, since preliminary data showed a suboptimal pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. To maintain a constant inhibition of the AChE and NMDA targets for the required length of time, the compound was given by chronic infusion with osmotic mini-pumps, providing a continuous flow to interact with the targets. For these reasons, ARN14140 is a prototype suitable to explore a concept but insufficient for becoming a medicine. We are now seeking to chemically optimize the PK profile and to explore new delivery strategies, such as transdermal patches, which could minimize the unfavorable plasma profile and maximize ARN14140 therapeutic efficacy.

The Aβ25-35-treated animals show a statistically relevant cognitive impairment as well as alteration of the major markers of neurodegeneration and cell death. ARN14140 was able to rescue the behavioral impairment in two different tasks and to balance the levels of biomarkers of neurodegeneration, synaptic plasticity, and apoptosis, which were modified by treatment with Aβ25-35. We should recall here that ARN14140 was simultaneously administered to Aβ25-35, showing that the molecule could be able to tackle neurodegeneration in the very early stages of the disease. However, based on our data, we could not argue whether ARN14140 is also able to reverse the neuronal damage already present in the brain of AD patients quite in advance of the symptom onset.

When administered to mice for 7 days at a dose of 7.5 μg/day, ARN14140 completely reverted the Aβ25-35-induced neurotoxicity in terms of behavioral tasks and biomarkers. We believe this highly positive feature was due to the synergistic potentiation arising from the simultaneous engagement of NMDAR and AChE. To support this hypothesis is the increasing evidence that the glutamatergic and cholinergic neuronal systems influence each other, and that their joint dysfunction is crucial to the effects produced by AD34. In particular, based on our recent findings on memantine and galantamine in combination35, we may hypothesize that the galantamine moiety could determine AChE inhibition, tackling memory loss and cognitive impairment. In addition, the galantamine function is expected to contrast NMDA-mediated neurotoxicity through the allosteric modulation of nicotinic receptors, thus potentiating memantine’s efficacy in promoting neuronal survival. This interpretation is, however, rather speculative and cannot rule out the involvement of additional, as yet unknown, mechanisms. Our data suggests that ARN14140 could serve as the initial prototype for a pharmacological advancement with respect to the current AD therapies, since it merges complementary activities that could otherwise only be achieved by administering a cocktail of molecules36.

Overall, the present study further confirms that multi-target compounds can play an important role in the treatment of complex neurological disorders, and may represent a novel paradigm in anti-AD drug discovery research.

Methods

Animals and treatment groups

All experiments were carried out in Amylgen facility (Montpellier, France). Animal procedures were carried out in strict adherence to the European Community Council Directive of September 22, 2010 (2010/63/UE). All experiments and protocols were authorised and approved by the French Ministry of Research, as well as by the Regional Animal Welfare Committee. All efforts were made to minimise the number of animals used.

A total of 72 male Swiss mice (RjOrl:SWISS, Janvier, Saint Berthevin, France) aged 6 weeks old and weighing 30–35 g, were used for Aβ25-35 intoxications. Animals were housed in the regulated animal facility of Amylgen (agreement #A 34-169-002 from May 02, 2014), in plastic cages with free access to food and water, except during behavioural experiments. They were kept in a regulated environment under a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights off at 07:00 pm).

Experimental protocol

Four experimental groups were used, with n = 18 per group: scrambled Aβ25-35 (Sc.Aβ) (9 nmol injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) once) + vehicle solution (infused i.c.v. during 7 days), Aβ25-35 (9 nmol injected i.c.v. once) + vehicle solution (infused i.c.v. during 7 days), Aβ25-35 (9 nmol injected i.c.v. once) + ARN1410 (infused i.c.v. at 2.5 μg/day during 7 days), and Aβ25-35 (9 nmol injected i.c.v. once) + ARN1410 (infused i.c.v. at 7.5 μg/day during 7 days). Animals were kept with n = 8 individuals per cage, the treatment being coded and blind to the experimenter. On day 0, mice were anesthetized using isoflurane 2.5% inhalation. They were injected i.c.v. with Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ peptide. An Alzet micro-osmotic pump delivering ARN14140 or vehicle solution was placed subcutaneously with the brain cannula into the lateral ventricle. On day 7, the spontaneous alternation performance was tested for n = 12 animals in the Y-maze test, an index of spatial working memory. On days 8 and 9, the contextual long-term memory was assessed using the step-through type passive avoidance procedure for the same animals, with training session on day 8 and retention session on day 9. On day 9, all animals were sacrificed. For half of the animals (n = 6 per group), the hippocampi and frontal cortex were dissected out and frozen in liquid nitrogen before being stored at −80 °C before analyses. One hippocampus was used to measure lipid peroxidation levels in tissue extracts. One cortex was used for ELISA assays. A second set of animals, with n = 6 animal per experimental group, were administered as described and transcardially perfused at day 9 with paraformaldehyde to allow brain slicing and histology/immunohistochemistry. These animals were not tested behaviorally.

Drugs and administration procedures

The Aβ25-35 peptide (SC489) and its control scrambled peptide, containing the 11 amino-acids of Aβ25-35 but in a random order, Sc.Aβ (SC492) were purchased from Polypeptides (France). Peptides were solubilized in sterile distilled water at a concentration of 3 mM and the homogeneous oligomeric preparation of Aβ25-35 peptides was performed according to Amylgen’s own procedure, leading to a > 98% pure soluble oligomers solution similar as described by Zussy et al.12,13. A quality control analysis for Aβ25-35 aggregation was systematically performed by analyzing Sc.Aβ and Aβ25-35 solutions using a light scattering assay before each injection of Aβ25-35 peptides. The Sc.Aβ solution (3 mM) does not aggregate and must show an OD320 nm < 0.2 while the Aβ25-35 solution at the same concentration must show an OD320 nm > 0.8. Each mouse was anesthetized with isoflurane 2.5% and injected i.c.v. with Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ peptides (9 nmol/mouse) in a final volume of 3 μL per mouse. The injection was performed using the hand-free method described by Haley & McCormick37, with the injection coordinates from Bregma: AP −0.4 mm, L 1.0 mm, V −2.5 mm (Paxinos and Franklin, 2012), as previously described14,32,38,39,40,41. ARN14140 was solubilized in PBS/0.5% acetic acid, pH = 6, at a concentration of 13.3 mg/mL and then diluted to the appropriate concentrations. It was infused using Alzet micro-osmotic pumps 1007D delivering 0.5 μL/h over 7 days (total volume 100 μL, solution concentrations of 0.21 g/L and 0.63 g/L). Each pump was connected to a brain infusion kit III (Charles River, L’Arbresles, France). Behavioral studies were carried out blind to the experimenter.

Spontaneous alternation performances

The spatial working memory was examined by measuring the spontaneous alternation behaviour of the mice in the Y-maze14,32,38,39,40,41. The Y-maze is made of grey polyvinylchloride. Each arm is 40 cm long, 13 cm high, 3 cm wide at the bottom, 10 cm wide at the top, and converging at an equal angle. Seven days after Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ peptide injection, each mouse was placed at the end of one arm and allowed to move freely through the maze during an 8 min session. The series of arm entries, including possible returns into the same arm, was recorded visually. An alternation was defined as entries into all three arms on consecutive occasions. The number of maximum alternations was the total number of arm entries minus two and the percentage of alternation was calculated as actual alternations/maximum alternations × 100. Measured parameters included the percentage of alternation (memory index) and total number of arm entries (exploration index).

Passive avoidance test

The contextual long-term memory of the animals was assessed using a two-session step-through passive avoidance procedure32,40,41.

The apparatus consisted of two compartments (15 × 20 × 15 cm high), one illuminated with white polyvinylchloride walls and the other darkened with black polyvinylchloride walls and a grid floor for electrical shocks. A guillotine door separated each compartment. A 60 W lamp positioned 40 cm above the apparatus lights up the white compartment during the experiment. Scrambled foot shocks could be delivered to the grid floor using a shock generator scrambler (Lafayette Instruments, Lafayette, USA). Training: 8 days after Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ peptide injection, each mouse was placed into the white compartment. After 5 s, the door was raised. When the mouse entered the darkened compartment and placed all its paws on the grid floor, the door was closed and the foot shock (0.3 mA) delivered for 3 s. The latency spent to enter the dark compartment and the number of vocalisations was recorded. None of the treatment affected the step-through latency (H = 0.31, p > 0.05) or vocalisations (H = 2.83, p > 0.05) during training. Retention: 24 h after training (9 days after Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ peptide injection), each mouse was placed again into the white compartment. After 5 s, the door was raised and the step-through latency (latency to enter the dark compartment) was recorded up to 300 s.

Lipid peroxidation

The quantification of lipid peroxidation in tissue extracts is based on Fe(III)xylenol orange complex formation according to Hermes-Lima et al.42. Six mice for each group were sacrificed by decapitation, without anesthesia nor sedation, 9 days after Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ peptide injection. The brains were rapidly removed, weighed and kept in liquid nitrogen until assayed. After thawing, one hippocampus per mouse was homogenized in cold methanol (1/10 w/v), centrifuged at 1,000 g for 5 min and the supernatant placed in an Eppendorf tube. The reaction volume of each homogenate was added to FeSO4 1 mM, H2SO4 0.25 M, xylenol orange 1 mM and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After reading the absorbance at 580 nm (A5801), 10 μL of cumene hydroperoxide (CHP) 1 mM was added to the sample and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, to determine the maximal oxidation level. The absorbance was measured at 580 nm (A5802).

The level of lipid peroxidation was determined as CHP equivalents according to: CHPE = A5801/A5802 × [CHP (nmol)] and expressed as CHP equivalents per mg of tissue and as a percentage of the control group data (V-treated Sc.Aβ-administered mice).

Biochemical analyses

Nine days after Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ injection, 6 animals were killed by decapitation, and hippocampi from 6 animals were dissected out, weighted and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. 6 hippocampi were used per group for ELISA assays.

For ELISA analysis, 6 hippocampi were homogenized in 50 mM Tris-150 mM NaCl buffer, pH 7.5 in eppendorf tubes, and sonicated for 2 × 10 s at 4 °C (2 × 1,0 kJ, BANDELIN Sonopuls HD3200). After centrifugation (16100 g for 15 min, 4 °C), the supernatants were assayed immediately by ELISA assay for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) (EMTNFA01, ThermoScientific), synaptophysin (Syn) (E90425M, USCN), Bax (E91343M, USCN), and Bcl-2 (E90778M, USCN) according to the manufacturer instructions. For each assay, absorbance was read at 450 nm and sample concentration was calculated using the standard curve. Results are expressed in pg of marker per mg of tissue.

Protein concentration was determined in brain homogenates with the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Perbio Science, France).

Histology/immunohistochemistry

Nine days after Aβ25-35 or Sc.Aβ peptide injection, 6 mice from each group were anesthetised by 200 μL intraperitoneal injection of a premix of ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), and quickly perfused transcardially with 100 mL of saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) followed by 100 mL of paraformaldehyde 4%. Brains were removed and kept for 48 h in the fixative solution at 4 °C, then cut into 10 μm thickness coronal sections using a cryostat. Sections were stained with 0.2% cresyl violet reagent (Sigma-Aldrich), dehydrated with graded ethanol, treated with toluene, and mounted with Mountex medium (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, Dorset, UK).

Examination of the CA1 area was performed using digitalized slices using a Nanozoomer virtual microscopy system (Hamamatsu, Massy, France). CA1 measurement and pyramidal cell counts were processed using a 40 × objective using ImageJ software (NIH). Data were expressed as mean number of viable cells per mm, from at least four slices × 3 CA1 fields × 2 hemispheres for each group, according to the previously reported method12.

For immunohistochemical labeling of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT), sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with Rabbit monoclonal anti-VAChT (SOSV00002G, Thermofisher). Then, sections were incubated with Rabbit biotinylated secondary antibody (B8895, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 1 h in avidin-biotin complex (ABC Vector laboratory). Signal was detected with the diaminobenzidine kit (Vector, Laboratories). Examination of the stained area was performed using digitalized slices using Optic microscope (Leica).

Statistical analyses

All values, except passive avoidance latencies, were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistic analyses were performed on the different conditions using one-way ANOVA (F value), followed by the Dunnett’s post-hoc multiple comparison test. Passive avoidance latencies do not follow a Gaussian distribution, since upper cut-off times are set. They were therefore analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA (H value), followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparison test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Reggiani, A. M. et al. In Vivo Characterization of ARN14140, a Memantine/Galantamine-Based Multi-Target Compound for Alzheimer’s Disease. Sci. Rep. 6, 33172; doi: 10.1038/srep33172 (2016).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Italian Institute of Technology and the University of Bologna. We thank Amylgen (Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) for the technical support. We thank Prof. Daniele Piomelli and Dr. Giuseppe Giardina for the useful discussions. We thank Grace Fox for editing and proofreading the manuscript.

Footnotes

Author Contributions A.M.R. provided expertise of behavioural and biochemical analyses, analysed the data and wrote the paper; E.S. performed the synthesis of ARN14140 and wrote the paper; R.C. performed the synthesis of ARN14140; A.M. discussed prepublication results, contributed to the interpretation of the data and reviewed the manuscript; J.M., E.K. and T.M. performed the biological studies; M.R. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the results, and wrote the paper; A.C. designed the research study, analysed and interpreted results, and wrote the paper. All authors have given approval to the final version of the paper.

References

  1. Querfurth H. W. & LaFerla F. M. Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 362, 329–344 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Citron M. Alzheimer’s disease: strategies for disease modification. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 387–398 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hardy J. A. & Higgins G. A. Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science 256, 184–185 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grundke-Iqbal I. et al. Microtubule-associated protein tau. A component of Alzheimer paired helical filaments. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 6084–6089 (1986). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. von Bernhardi R. & Eugenín J. Alzheimer’s disease: redox dysregulation as a common denominator for diverse pathogenic mechanisms. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 16, 974–1031 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosini M., Simoni E., Milelli A., Minarini A. & Melchiorre C. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease: are we connecting the dots? J. Med. Chem. 57, 2821–2831 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Association A. s. 2013 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 9, 208–245 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ballard C. et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 377, 1019–1031 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosini M. Polypharmacology: the rise of multitarget drugs over combination therapies. Future Med. Chem. 6, 485–487 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Simoni E. et al. Combining galantamine and memantine in multitargeted, new chemical entities potentially useful in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Med. Chem. 55, 9708–9721 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosini M., Simoni E., Minarini A. & Melchiorre C. Multi-target design strategies in the context of Alzheimer’s disease: acetylcholinesterase inhibition and NMDA receptor antagonism as the driving forces. Neurochem. Res. 39, 1914–1923 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zussy C. et al. Time-course and regional analyses of the physiopathological changes induced after cerebral injection of an amyloid β fragment in rats. Am. J. Pathol. 179, 315–334 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zussy C. et al. Alzheimer’s disease related markers, cellular toxicity and behavioral deficits induced six weeks after oligomeric amyloid-β peptide injection in rats. PLoS One 8, e53117 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maurice T., Lockhart B. P. & Privat A. Amnesia induced in mice by centrally administered beta-amyloid peptides involves cholinergic dysfunction. Brain Res. 706, 181–193 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lahmy V. et al. Blockade of Tau hyperphosphorylation and Aβ₁–₄₂ generation by the aminotetrahydrofuran derivative ANAVEX2-73, a mixed muscarinic and σ₁ receptor agonist, in a nontransgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 1706–1723 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klementiev B. et al. A neural cell adhesion molecule-derived peptide reduces neuropathological signs and cognitive impairment induced by Abeta25-35. Neuroscience 145, 209–224 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaminsky Y. G., Marlatt M. W., Smith M. A. & Kosenko E. A. Subcellular and metabolic examination of amyloid-beta peptides in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis: evidence for Abeta(25–35). Exp. Neurol. 221, 26–37 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morris R. G. & Kopelman M. D. The memory deficits in Alzheimer-type dementia: a review. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 38, 575–602 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bradley-Whitman M. A. & Lovell M. A. Biomarkers of lipid peroxidation in Alzheimer disease (AD): an update. Arch. Toxicol. 89, 1035–1044 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Casado A., Encarnación López-Fernández M., Concepción Casado M. & de La Torre R. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities in vascular and Alzheimer dementias. Neurochem. Res. 33, 450–458 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rivest S. Regulation of innate immune responses in the brain. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 429–439 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Heneka M. T. et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 14, 388–405 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Love S. et al. Premorbid effects of APOE on synaptic proteins in human temporal neocortex. in Neurobiol. Aging Vol. 27, 797–803 (United States, 2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Masliah E. et al. Synaptic and neuritic alterations during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 174, 67–72 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shimohama S. Apoptosis in Alzheimer’s disease–an update. Apoptosis 5, 9–16 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hugon J., Terro F., Esclaire F. & Yardin C. Markers of apoptosis and models of programmed cell death in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neural. Transm. Suppl. 59, 125–131 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paradis E., Douillard H., Koutroumanis M., Goodyer C. & LeBlanc A. Amyloid beta peptide of Alzheimer’s disease downregulates Bcl-2 and upregulates bax expression in human neurons. J. Neurosci. 16, 7533–7539 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cavalli A. et al. Multi-target-directed ligands to combat neurodegenerative diseases. J. Med. Chem. 51, 347–372 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Samochocki M. et al. Galantamine is an allosterically potentiating ligand of neuronal nicotinic but not of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 305, 1024–1036 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Takada-Takatori Y. et al. Neuroprotective effects of galanthamine and tacrine against glutamate neurotoxicity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 549, 19–26 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xia P., Chen H. S., Zhang D. & Lipton S. A. Memantine preferentially blocks extrasynaptic over synaptic NMDA receptor currents in hippocampal autapses. J. Neurosci. 30, 11246–11250 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meunier J., Ieni J. & Maurice T. The anti-amnesic and neuroprotective effects of donepezil against amyloid beta25-35 peptide-induced toxicity in mice involve an interaction with the sigma1 receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 149, 998–1012 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maurice T. Protection by sigma-1 receptor agonists is synergic with donepezil, but not with memantine, in a mouse model of amyloid-induced memory impairments. Behav. Brain Res. 296, 270–278 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Parsons C. G., Danysz W., Dekundy A. & Pulte I. Memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors: complementary mechanisms in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotox. Res. 24, 358–369 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lopes J. P., Tarozzo G., Reggiani A., Piomelli D. & Cavalli A. Galantamine potentiates the neuroprotective effect of memantine against NMDA-induced excitotoxicity. Brain Behav. 3, 67–74 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Busquet P. et al. Synergistic effects of galantamine and memantine in attenuating scopolamine-induced amnesia in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 120, 305–309 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Haley T. J. & Mccormick W. G. Pharmacological effects produced by intracerebral injection of drugs in the conscious mouse. Br. J. Pharmacol. Chemother. 12, 12–15 (1957). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Maurice T., Su T. P. & Privat A. Sigma1 (sigma 1) receptor agonists and neurosteroids attenuate B25-35-amyloid peptide-induced amnesia in mice through a common mechanism. Neuroscience 83, 413–428 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Meunier J., Villard V., Givalois L. & Maurice T. The γ-secretase inhibitor 2-[(1R)-1-[(4-chlorophenyl)sulfonyl](2,5-difluorophenyl) amino]ethyl-5-fluorobenzenebutanoic acid (BMS-299897) alleviates Aβ1-42 seeding and short-term memory deficits in the Aβ25-35 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 698, 193–199 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Villard V. et al. Antiamnesic and neuroprotective effects of the aminotetrahydrofuran derivative ANAVEX1-41 against amyloid beta(25-35)-induced toxicity in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 1552–1566 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Villard V., Espallergues J., Keller E., Vamvakides A. & Maurice T. Anti-amnesic and neuroprotective potentials of the mixed muscarinic receptor/sigma 1 (σ1) ligand ANAVEX2-73, a novel aminotetrahydrofuran derivative. J. Psychopharmacol. 25, 1101–1117 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hermes-Lima M., Willmore W. G. & Storey K. B. Quantification of lipid peroxidation in tissue extracts based on Fe(III)xylenol orange complex formation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 19, 271–280 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES