Abstract
Lipid A (also known as endotoxin) is the hydrophobic portion of lipopolysaccharides. It is an essential membrane component required for the viability of gram-negative bacteria. The enzymes involved in its biosynthesis are attractive targets for the development of novel antibiotics. LpxH catalyzes the fourth step of the lipid A biosynthesis pathway and cleaves the pyrophosphate bond of UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine to yield 2,3-diacylglucosamine 1-phosphate (lipid X) and UMP. Here we present the structures of LpxH from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PaLpxH). PaLpxH consists of two domains: a catalytic domain that is homologous to the metallophosphoesterases and a helical insertion domain. Lipid X was captured in the crevice between these two domains, with its phosphate group facing the dinuclear metal (Mn2+) center and two acyl chains buried in the hydrophobic cavity. The structures reveal that a large conformational change occurs at the lipid X binding site surface upon the binding/release of the product molecule. Based on these observations, we propose a novel model for lipid X embedding, which involves the scissor-like movement of helix α6, resulting in the release of lipid X into the lipid bilayer.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the main component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Composed of a polysaccharide chain and lipid moiety, LPS forms a permeability barrier to protect gram-negative bacteria from environmental stresses, such as detergents and antibiotics. The hydrophobic portion of LPS (lipid A) anchors LPS to the outer membrane1. Lipid A (also known as endotoxin) is the active component of LPS and is responsible for many of the pathological disorders caused by infection with gram-negative bacteria. It strongly stimulates the innate immune system of animals and induces an inflammatory reaction in the host cells by activating the TLR4/MD2 receptor of the mammalian innate immune system2. Lipid A is very important for the viability and pathogenicity of gram-negative bacteria; therefore, enzymes involved in lipid A biosynthesis are attractive targets for the development of novel antibiotics.
In Escherichia coli lipid A is synthesized from UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) in nine steps, each of which are catalyzed by different enzymes (Fig. 1)3. Most of these constitutive enzymes are well conserved in gram-negative bacteria. In the fourth step in this pathway, UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine is hydrolyzed to 2,3-diacylglucosamine-1-phosphate (also called lipid X) and UMP. This step is catalyzed by the specific pyrophosphatase LpxH in 70% of gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and by LpxI in the remaining 30%3,4,5. Although these two enzymes provide the same product from the same substrate, they have no sequence similarity and are not found in the same organisms. Furthermore, they have different metal ion requirements and attack different phosphorus atoms during hydrolysis; LpxH attacks the α-phosphate of UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine, and LpxI attacks the β-phosphate4. In spite of these differences, LpxI can compensate for LpxH loss in E. coli; thus, the two enzymes are considered to have the same role in the context of lipid A biosynthesis4.
The tertiary structure of LpxI is known5, but the structure of the major isozyme LpxH has not been studied to date. LpxH shares sequence similarity with metallophosphoesterases and requires Mn2+ ions for phosphatase activity6. To provide insight into the reaction mechanism of this important peripheral membrane protein and lipid X biosynthesis, we have determined the structure of LpxH from P. aeruginosa (PaLpxH). In the present study, we analyzed five different crystal structures, including the product complex (PaLpxH–lipid X) with and without Mn2+ ions. Although wild-type PaLpxH captured lipid X from E. coli cells, the H10N mutant, which has lost Mn1-binding ability, captured neither lipid X nor the substrate. Moreover, LpxH undergoes a large conformational change upon release of lipid X, which suggests that the membrane embedding of the product molecule is different from the one proposed for LpxI. More recently, as we prepared this manuscript, a third constitutive UPD-2,3-diacylglucosamine hydrolase, LpxG, was found in the genomic library of Chlamydia trachomatis7. The relationship of this constituent member with LpxH is also discussed.
Results
Structure analysis of PaLpxH
PaLpxH was crystallized in the presence of Mn2+ ions, which are required for enzymatic activity6,8. The structure was determined with the multi-wavelength anomalous diffraction method using Mn2+ ions. Two PaLpxH molecules were present in the asymmetric unit of the P21 crystal, and all 239 amino acid residues were unambiguously determined for both molecules (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, the high-resolution electron density (1.65 Å) clearly identified a stoichiometrically bound product molecule (lipid X, 2,3-diacylglucosamine-1-phosphate) and two Mn2+ ions in each PaLpxH molecule (Fig. 2). The lipid X molecule was likely captured in E. coli cells because no substrate molecule (UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine) or product molecule (lipid X) was added during purification or crystallization. Proteins without Mn2+ ions were also successfully crystallized in two different space groups. A C2 form was obtained with no Mn2+ ions added during crystallization, and a P21 form was obtained by adding EDTA prior to crystallization. These crystals also contained two PaLpxH molecules in the asymmetric unit. The two molecules in the asymmetric unit had similar hydrophobic contacts with each other in all these crystals (see below). No major changes were observed in the protein structures regardless of the presence of Mn2+ ions (Fig. S1), suggesting that Mn2+ ions do not have a major effect on the protein structure.
PaLpxH consists of two domains: a catalytic domain homologous to metallophosphoesterases (MPEs) and a helical insertion domain (HI domain) inserted in the middle of the catalytic domain. The catalytic domain of approximately 180 residues (Met1–Leu118 and Val174–Leu240) is composed of two facing β sheets (a six-stranded β sheet that includes β1–β4 and β10–β11 and a five-stranded β sheet that includes β5–β9) and four peripheral α helices (α1–α3 and α8). The HI domain is composed of four α helices (α4–α7), and no similar structure was found in the PDB. At the boundary between the catalytic and HI domains, invariant residues and two Mn2+ ions form a dinuclear metal center (Fig. 3a).
Recognition of lipid X by LpxH
Lipid X is positioned in a crevice between the catalytic and HI domains, with the phosphate group facing the dinuclear metal center and two acyl chains buried in the hydrophobic cavity (Fig. 2). Twenty-one amino acid residues in the HI domain and seven amino acid residues in the catalytic domain are involved in the binding of lipid X through direct or water-mediated interactions (Fig. 3b). The glucosamine-1-phosphate moiety is specifically recognized through hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions with a number of residues that belong to both HI and catalytic domains. Residues Asn79 and His195, which are involved in Mn2+ coordination, also participate in the binding of lipid X (Fig. 3).
This product binding mode is quite different from that of LpxI, an enzyme that has the same catalytic activity as LpxH. In the LpxI–lipid X complex, only acyl chains are enveloped by the hydrophobic pocket of the LpxI molecule, and the glucosamine-1-phosphate moiety is positioned far out into the solvent. The two acyl chains are not distinguished, and the molecule is bound with two alternative conformations rotated by 180° about the long axis between the two acyl chains5. In contrast, the head region of the lipid X molecule, which is rich in hydrophilic functional groups, remains in contact with LpxH, and the two acyl chains are distinctively recognized. The 3-acyl chain interacts with LpxH only at the proximal region of the chain, with the distal part out of the LpxH molecule, whereas the 2-acyl chain is deeply buried in the hydrophobic cavity between the catalytic and HI domains (Fig. 2). Therefore, the area of interaction of the LpxH with 2-acyl chain is much larger than that with the 3-acyl chain. Most o f the interactions observed in the enzyme–product (EP) complex are likely to be present in the specific binding that occurs when LpxH recognizes the substrate. Indeed, this structure explains previous observations that the precursor molecules of UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine, UDP-GlcNAc or UDP-3-O-(R)-3-hydroxymyristoyl-GlcNAc cannot be the substrate of LpxH6.
Structural analysis of the H10N mutant (apo form)
To investigate enzymatic reaction mechanism, a mutant was prepared in which Mn1-coordinated His10 was replaced with Asn (H10N). Its structure was determined with (Mn2 bound form) and without (Mn2 unbound form) manganese ion. Both these mutants crystallized in the space group P212121. As expected, the H10N mutant did not bind to Mn1. Previous knowledge of the reaction mechanism of MPEs suggested that the mutant deficient of Mn1 binding would have no enzymatic activity8,9,10. Although it was prepared using the same protocol as the wild type, this PaLpxH mutant did not capture a product molecule (lipid X). The substrate molecule UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine was also not observed in the electron density map. However, except for the loss of Mn1, no large conformational change occurred in the vicinity of the mutated Asn10 residue, and the structure of the whole catalytic domain was similar to that of the wild type. Thus, the direct effect of H10N mutation on PaLpxH seems to be the loss of Mn1-binding ability. Together with the fact that Mn2+ ions have little influence on the structure of PaLpxH, we assumed that this structure represents the conformation of the enzyme when the substrate is not bound. Hereafter, we will call this structure the apo form.
Comparison of the apo and EP complex forms
Although no major conformational differences are observed in the catalytic domain when comparing the apo and EP complexes, the structure of HI domain varies extensively in the region of α6–α7 (residues 158–172) (Fig. 4). There is no electron density for the C-terminal half of α6 and the following loop region (residues 161–169 in P212121 crystal with one Mn2+, 159–165 in P212121 crystal with no Mn2+) in the apo form, indicating they are highly mobile and disordered. Furthermore, the folding of the protein is completely changed in the subsequent region. In the apo form, α7 (residues 169–172) disappears and a loop (P212121 with one Mn2+) or a short 310 helix at residues 168–170 (P212121 with no Mn2+) is created. As a result, the orientation of the side chains of residues 170–172 is completely different between the two forms. The hydrogen bonds between the side chain of Arg198 and the carbonyl oxygen of Ile171 stabilize the structure in the apo form, whereas they are not present in the EP complex due to an approximate 180° psi rotation at Ile171 and Ile172 (Fig. 4b). As shown in Fig. 3b, a significant structural change in residues 158–172 is important for the recognition of lipid X (and probably also the substrate); the binding site is wide open in the apo form, whereas in the EP complex, two alpha helices (α6 and α7) are formed to assemble a stable EP complex.
Discussion
Members of the MPE superfamily have seven well-conserved residues coordinated to the two metal ions of the dinuclear metal center9,11,12. These residues (Asp8, His10, Asp41, Asn79, His114, His195, and His197) are also present in PaLpxH. Six ligands [Asp8, His10, Asp41 (bridging two Mn2+ ions), His197, and two hydroxide ions (designated as W1 and W2)] are octahedrally coordinated with Mn1. In contrast, five ligands provide an incomplete octahedral coordination with Mn2: Asp41, Asn79, His114, His195, and W2 (bridging two Mn2+ ions) (Fig. 3a). In many MPEs studied to date, octahedral coordination of both metal ions of the dinuclear metal center is completed by the coordination of the phosphate group of the substrate. In terms of PaLpxH, this corresponds to the coordination of the oxygen atom of the phosphate group at the vacant position of Mn2. In the ES complex, the alpha phosphate of the substrate (UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine) is expected to occupy this position and complete the octahedral coordination of both Mn2+ ions.
In contrast to the catalytic domain, the structure of the HI domain is unique; Dali server13 detected no homologous structures in the PDB. On comparing the three-dimensional structures and topologies among the three MPEs [LpxH, Mre11 (multifunctional nuclease involved in DNA repair)9, and Rv0805 (cyclic AMP phosphoesterase)]14 (Fig. S2), these MPEs consist of a homologous catalytic domain and a specific substrate recognition domain. The HI domain is unique not only in amino acid sequence and tertiary structure but also in the relative positions of the primary and tertiary structure in the catalytic domain (Fig. S2). It is inserted into the approximate center of the catalytic domain, and the product molecule (lipid X) is trapped in the hydrophobic cavity formed at the catalytic–HI domains interface. For Mre11, peptide chains are partly inserted near the C-terminus of the catalytic domain and partly attached to the C-terminal end9. Rv0805 forms a functional homodimer, thereby creating an active site pocket between the two monomer units14. In this manner, the inserted or attached domains determine the substrate and reaction specificity of the MPEs.
As described above, most of the interactions observed in the EP complex are assumed to be present in the ES complex as well. In the proposed hydrolysis mechanism of the Mre11 nuclease, the hydroxide ion activated by Mn1 undergoes a nucleophilic attack on the phosphorus atom of the phosphodiester linkage9,15. This hydroxide ion corresponds to the hydroxide ion W1 in the EP complex of PaLpxH (Fig. 5). W1 is positioned close enough to attack the alpha phosphate of the substrate in the ES complex, as deduced from the structure of the EP complex (Fig. 5). Thus, the present structure is consistent with the previously proposed reaction mechanism6.
It was previously reported that six alanine mutants of Haemophilus influenza LpxH (HiLpxH) have shown a significant decrease in hydrolysis activity8. Our structures show that five out of the six residues (Asp9, His11, Asp42, His115 and His196 of HiLpxH; corresponding to Asp8, His10, Asp41, His114 and His195 of PaLpxH) participate in Mn2+ coordination, and the last one (Arg81 of HiLpxH; Arg80 of PaLpxH) is involved in lipid X binding (Fig. 3). In many MPEs, the position occupied by Arg80 in the tertiary structure of PaLpxH is occupied by the His residue involved in phosphoester bond hydrolysis. For example, the corresponding residue (His85) of Mre11 has been suggested to act as a proton donor in the enzymatic reaction15, and His98 of Rv0805 contributes to the stabilization of reaction intermediates during cAMP hydrolysis14. In other MPEs, the corresponding His residue is well conserved, and there are many reports that suggest the importance of this residue10,16,17. Thus, it is significant that only in LpxH, this His residue is substituted by Arg in all species of known sequence18 (Fig. S3). In the EP complex, the phosphate group of lipid X (corresponding to the beta phosphate moiety of UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine) is strongly bound to Arg80 through a bidentate salt bridge. Thus, we speculate that Arg80 helps neutralize the negative charge of the ES complex (Fig. 5). LpxH exhibits a sharp decrease in its catalytic activity at low pH6,8. Using pH-specific activity rate profile of HiLpxH, a pKa of the reaction was estimated to be 6.6 ± 0.48. It is in good agreement with pKa values (~6.5) for the second ionization of pyrophosphate in UDP-GlcNAc19 and is consistent with the model in Fig. 5. We assume that LpxH requires both interactions of the deprotonated phosphate groups (Mn2+ coordination of the alpha phosphate, and salt bridge of the beta phosphate to Arg80) to form stable ES complex. The knowledge of this unique recognition mechanism of glycolipid by LpxH may facilitate the development of novel antibiotics targeting lipid A biosynthesis.
Two paralogs (designated PaLpxH and PaLpxH2) of E. coli LpxH have been shown to be present in P. aeruginosa. PaLpxH2 is less similar (sharing 28% identity and 39% similarity) to E. coli LpxH, compared with PaLpxH (sharing 46% identity and 61% similarity)20. PaLpxH has been proven to have UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphatase activity6, whereas no concrete evidence of the enzymatic activity of PaLpxH2 has been reported. Although PaLpxH2 has an insertion sequence of a size similar to that of PaLpxH within its MPE domain, conserved residues are completely different between these two insertion sequences. Most of the residues that are critical for lipid X recognition or that are involved in inter-domain interactions in PaLpxH are replaced by other residues in PaLpxH2 (Fig. S4). This suggests that the substrate of PaLpxH2 is something other than UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine. After LpxH and LpxH2 diverted from a common ancestral protein by gene duplication, they have evolved independently to acquire different substrate specificities. The insertion sequence of PaLpxH2 has a remarkably high proportion of aromatic side chains, which presumably reflects the characteristics of the substrate to be bound. Very recently, an ortholog of LpxH designated LpxG has been reported from the genomic library of C. trachomatis7. This has been proven to have UPD-2,3-diacylglucosamine hydrolase activity in vivo and in vitro. Sequence comparison clearly shows that LpxG also has an MPE domain (Fig. S4). At least six of the seven important residues coordinated to Mn2+ ions are conserved in LpxG. However, the residues corresponding to the helical insertion are not well conserved in LpxG. Thus, we assume that these two proteins have a distantly related common ancestor, but have independently evolved. The interfacial catalytic mechanism discussed in the next section will likely differ between these two proteins.
Two unrelated enzymes, LpxH and LpxI, are known to have the same catalytic activity of UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphatases in the lipid A synthetic pathway. The present analysis shows that whereas the relative position of the catalytic and lipid-binding domains in LpxI is significantly changed when the substrate/product binds5, no change is observed in the relative position between the apo form and EP complex in LpxH. Rather, a significant change is observed within the HI domain (Fig. 4). Thus, although the two enzymes have the same UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphatase activity and play the same role in the lipid A synthetic pathway4, their catalytic mechanisms are completely different.
An interfacial catalysis model has been proposed for LpxI in which each of the two domains forms the halves of an inter-domain active site5. Clearly, the structure of LpxH suggests that this scheme cannot be applied to LpxH, as no substantial change in inter-domain orientation is expected. In this regard, it is important to note that all five crystal forms solved in the present study have two LpxH molecules in the asymmetric unit and that they are packed with the same hydrophobic surface facing each other (Fig. S5). This hydrophobic surface is the outer surface of the HI domain within which the product molecule (lipid X) is bound. We suggest that this hydrophobic contact mimics the interactions between LpxH and the membrane. It has been previously reported that the addition of MnCl2 to the buffers used to prepare the extracts of the overproduced LpxH increases the membrane localization of LpxH hydrolase activity6. We assume that this increase in membrane affinity is the result of an increase in EP complex formation caused by MnCl2, with concomitant structural change as observed in the present study. A detailed structural comparison of the apo form with the EP complex shows that most of the important interactions between the catalytic and HI domains occur within the N-terminal half of HI domain (α4 and α5). Upon the release of lipid X, only the C-terminal half (α6 and α7) moves, whereas the N-terminal half remains unchanged (Fig. S6). Based on these observations, we propose a novel model for lipid X embedding (Fig. 6), which involves the scissor-like movement of α6 helix upon interaction with the membrane, resulting in the release of the product molecule into the lipid bilayer.
Materials and Methods
Cloning, expression, purification and crystallization were described in supporting information.
X-ray data collection and structure determination
All data were collected under cryogenic conditions (100 K) after crystals were flash-frozen in a gaseous nitrogen stream. Multi-wavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) data were collected using a single P21 crystal containing lipid X and two Mn2+ using a wavelength of 1.8925 Å (peak) and 1.0000 Å (remote) based on the absorption edge of the manganese atom. All data sets were indexed, integrated, scaled, and merged using the HKL2000 program suite21. The structure was determined by MAD phasing using Mn2+ bound to LpxH as scatterers. The sites of four Mn2+ ions in the asymmetric unit were found using the program SHELXD22, and the initial phase was calculated and modified with the program SHELXE22. The initial model was built to 98% of PaLpxH molecules using ARP/wARP23. Remaining protein residues and lipid X molecules were manually located in Coot24. Completion of the structures was straightforward using iterative cycles of manual model fitting in Coot and computational refinement in REFMAC525,26. The structures of the other four crystals were determined using the molecular replacement method with the program MOLREP27, using the monomer structure of PaLpxH as a search model followed by a rigid-body refinement with the program REFMAC5. After completion of the refinement, the program PROCHECK28 was used to assess the quality of the final models. Images of the structures and electron density maps were generated using PyMOL29. Data collection and refinement statistics are presented in Table S1.
Additional Information
Accession codes: The coordinates and structure factor amplitudes have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (www.pdb.org). PDB ID codes: 5B49 (LpxH complexed with lipid X and Mn2+), 5B4A (LpxH complexed with lipid X (P21 form), 5B4B (LpxH complexed with lipid X (C2 form). 5B4C (LpxH mutant H10N complexed with Mn2+), and 5B4D (LpxH mutant H10N).
How to cite this article: Okada, C. et al. Crystal structures of the UDP-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphohydrase LpxH from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 6, 32822; doi: 10.1038/srep32822 (2016).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal No. 2011B1385). We thank the beamline staff of SPring-8 and Photon Factory for their assistance with data collection. This work was supported in part by Photon and Quantum Basic Research Coordinated Development Program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31370731 to MY).
Footnotes
Author Contributions C.O., A.S. and M.Y. designed the research; C.O., H.W. and M.K. performed the research; C.O. and M.Y. analyzed the data; I.T., C.O. and M.Y. wrote the main manuscript text, and prepared all figures and table, including supporting information; all authors reviewed the manuscript.
References
- Raetz C. R. Biochemistry of endotoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 129–170 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raetz C. R. H., Reynolds C. M., Trent M. S. & Bishop R. E. Lipid A modification systems in gram-negative bacteria. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 295–329 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raetz C. R. H. & Whitfield C. Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 635–700 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metzger L. E. & Raetz C. R. H. An alternative route for UDP-diacylglucosamine hydrolysis in bacterial lipid A biosynthesis. Biochemistry 49, 6715–6726 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metzger L. E., Lee J. K., Finer-Moore J. S., Raetz C. R. H. & Stroud R. M. LpxI structures reveal how a lipid A precursor is synthesized. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1132–1138 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babinski K. J., Ribeiro A. A. & Raetz C. R. H. The Escherichia coli gene encoding the UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphatase of lipid A biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25937–25946 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young H. E. et al. Discovery of the Elusive UDP-Diacylglucosamine Hydrolase in the Lipid A Biosynthetic Pathway in Chlamydia trachomatis. Mbio. 7, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young H. E., Donohue M. P., Smirnova T. I., Smirnov A. I. & Zhou P. The UDP-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphohydrolase LpxH in lipid A biosynthesis utilizes Mn2+ cluster for catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 26987–27001 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopfner K. P. et al. Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell 105, 473–485 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitić N. et al. The catalytic mechanisms of binuclear metallohydrolases. Chem. Rev. 106, 3338–3363 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richter W. 3′,5′ Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases class III: members, structure, and catalytic mechanism. Proteins 46, 278–286 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller D. J. et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of a novel Mn2+-dependent phosphodiesterase encoded by the yfcE gene. Protein Sci. 16, 1338–1348 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holm L. & Rosenström P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545–W549 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Podobnik M. et al. A mycobacterial cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase that moonlights as a modifier of cell wall permeability. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 32846–32857 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthur L. M. et al. Structural and functional analysis of Mre11-3. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1886–1893 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoff R. H., Mertz P., Rusnak F. & Hengge A. C. The Transition State of the Phosphoryl-Transfer Reaction Catalyzed by the Lambda Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 6382–6390 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- Funhoff E. G., Wang Y., Andersson G. & Averill B. A. Substrate positioning by His92 is important in catalysis by purple acid phosphatase. FEBS J. 272, 2968–2977 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sievers F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jancan I. & Macnaughtan M. A. Acid dissociation constants of uridine-5′-diphosphate compounds determined by 31phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and internal pH referencing. Anal. Chim. Acta 749, 63–69 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babinski K. J., Kanjilal S. J. & Raetz C. R. H. Accumulation of the lipid A precursor UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine in an Escherichia coli mutant lacking the lpxH gene. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25947–25956 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otwinowski Z. & Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods in Enzymology 276, 307–326 (Elsevier, 1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldrick G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A. 64, 112–122 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langer G., Cohen S. X., Lamzin V. S. & Perrakis A. Automated macromolecular model building for X-ray crystallography using ARP/wARP version 7. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1171–1179 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emsley P. & Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murshudov G. N., Vagin A. A. & Dodson E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240–255 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winn M. D., Isupov M. N. & Murshudov G. N. Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 57, 122–133 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vagin A. & Teplyakov A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol.Crystallogr. 66, 22–25 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laskowski R. A., MacArthur M. W., Moss D. S. & Thornton J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993). [Google Scholar]
- DeLano W. L. The Pymol Molecular Graphics System. (Delano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, 2002) [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg D., Schwarz E., Komaromy M. & Wall R. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J. Mol. Biol. 179, 125–142 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.