Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1994 Jan;47(1):15–17. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.1.15

Cytokeratin expression and acetowhite change in cervical epithelium.

P Maddox 1, A Szarewski 1, J Dyson 1, J Cuzick 1
PMCID: PMC501748  PMID: 7510721

Abstract

AIM--To investigate the distribution of cytokeratins 10, 13, 14 and 19 in biopsy specimens taken from acetowhite and non-acetowhite areas of the cervix. METHOD--Cervical biopsy specimens were taken from both acetowhite and non-acetowhite areas from 44 patients who presented with abnormal cervical cytology. The specimens were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and multiple sections taken from each specimen. Staining was performed for cytokeratins 10, 13, 14, 19 and NADPH diaphorase enzyme. The areas of each section positive for the various markers were measured. RESULTS--Cytokeratin 10 positive cells were greatly increased in number in acetowhite biopsy specimens compared with non-acetowhite samples (45.1% v 2.8%; p < 0.0001). Cytokeratin 19 was also increased, but to a lesser extent (17.8% v 5.5%; p < 0.0001). In contrast, the almost universal expression of cytokeratin 13 was reduced in acetowhite biopsy specimens (86.2% v 96.9%; p < 0.0001). Cytokeratin 14 was found diffusely in the basal region of the stratified squamous epithelium and was marginally more apparent in the acetowhite biopsy specimens (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION--It is suggested that the presence of cytokeratin 10 may be an essential requirement for the formation of acetowhite change in association with the cellular swelling caused by acetic acid.

Full text

PDF
15

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Lane E. B., Bártek J., Purkis P. E., Leigh I. M. Keratin antigens in differentiating skin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1985;455:241–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb50415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Neumann R. A., Knobler R. M., Pieczkowski F., Gebhart W. Enzyme histochemical analysis of cell viability after argon laser-induced coagulation necrosis of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 Dec;25(6 Pt 1):991–998. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70296-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Purkis P. E., Steel J. B., Mackenzie I. C., Nathrath W. B., Leigh I. M., Lane E. B. Antibody markers of basal cells in complex epithelia. J Cell Sci. 1990 Sep;97(Pt 1):39–50. doi: 10.1242/jcs.97.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Smedts F., Ramaekers F., Robben H., Pruszczynski M., van Muijen G., Lane B., Leigh I., Vooijs P. Changing patterns of keratin expression during progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Pathol. 1990 Mar;136(3):657–668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stafl A. Cervicography: a new method for cervical cancer detection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Apr 1;139(7):815–825. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90549-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. van Muijen G. N., Ruiter D. J., Franke W. W., Achtstätter T., Haasnoot W. H., Ponec M., Warnaar S. O. Cell type heterogeneity of cytokeratin expression in complex epithelia and carcinomas as demonstrated by monoclonal antibodies specific for cytokeratins nos. 4 and 13. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Jan;162(1):97–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90429-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES