Abstract
Interaction of CaMKII and the GluN2B subunit of NMDA receptor is essential for synaptic plasticity events such as LTP. Synaptic targeting of CaMKII and regulation of its biochemical functions result from this interaction. GluN2B binding to the T-site of CaMKII leads to changes in substrate binding and catalytic parameters and inhibition of its own dephosphorylation. We find that CaMKIINα, a natural inhibitor that binds to the T-site of CaMKII, also causes inhibition of dephosphorylation of CaMKII similar to GluN2B. Two residues on α-CaMKII, Glu96 and His282, are involved in the inhibition of CaMKII dephosphorylation exerted by binding of GluN2B. E96A-α-CaMKII is known to be defective in GluN2B-induced catalytic modulation. Data presented here show that, in both E96A and H282A mutants of α-CaMKII, GluN2B-induced inhibition of dephosphorylation is impaired.
Highlights
CaMKIINα inhibits dephosphorylation of CaMKII
Glu96 and His282 of α-CaMKII mediate the GluN2B induced regulatory effects
1. Introduction
Many mechanisms exist for the stable storage of information in living systems. Activity dependent strengthening of neuronal synapse leads to long term potentiation (LTP), a cellular mechanism required for learning and memory. The activation of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) and subsequent influx of calcium into the postsynaptic compartment activates calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and initiates downstream events required for the induction of LTP. CaMKII is a dodecameric holoenzyme that can undergo autophosphorylation generating calcium independent activity [1]. The autophosphorylation of CaMKII at Thr286 is important for the induction of LTP [2–6]. It has been suggested that CaMKII in concert with protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) can act as a bistable switch [7,8]. Reconstitution of CaMKII-Thr286 autophosphorylation in vitro in presence of PP1 and GluN2B sequence shows that the presence of GluN2B favors the phosphorylated state of Thr286 [9] and generates a system that shows biochemical properties necessary for a memory switch [8]. The autophosphorylated CaMKII bound to postsynaptic density (PSD) can be dephosphorylated by PP1 in PSD [10,11]. The CaMKII-phosphatase system can function as a molecular switch which is energy efficient and is sensitive to calcium signals and can aid in the formation of stable memories [9–15]. CaMKII as it translocates to PSD binds to GluN2B subunit of NMDAR [16–19]. The interaction of CaMKII with GluN2B is important for induction and maintenance of LTP [20–22]. The disruption of this interaction causes impairment of LTP [23,24]. Further, the binding of GluN2B to the T-site of CaMKII converts the enzyme into a persistently active state, and also modulates the catalytic activity of the enzyme, by altering the parameters of kinetics and substrate binding [9,25–27]. The interaction of CaMKII with GluN2B thus contributes to the switch that supports memory maintenance [8,9,28–30].
CaMKII inhibitor protein CaMKIINα is an endogenous inhibitor of CaMKII, which binds to the T-site of CaMKII [31–34]. The CaMKIINα mRNA is upregulated during fear learning [35, 36]. Sufficient concentration of a CaMKIINα derived peptide, CaMKIINtide, disrupted the CaMKII-NMDAR complex and caused a persistent reduction in the complex, leading to reduction in synaptic strength as seen by the depotentiation and the reversal of LTP maintenance [21,22].
The current study probes the impact of T-site binding proteins on the dephosphorylation of CaMKII. An attempt has been made to decipher amino acid residues of CaMKII involved in the structural changes accompanying the binding of ligands to the T-site of CaMKII.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
ATP, calmodulin, calmodulin-agarose, protease inhibitor cocktail, anti-α-CaMKII antibody, secondary antibody conjugates, PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride) and DTT (dithiothreitol) were from Sigma Chemicals, USA. Phosphocellulose was from Whatman, UK. IPTG (Isopropylthiogalactoside) and glutathione sepharose 4B were from GE, USA. Pierce glutathione-agarose was from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Phospho-Thr286-α-CaMKII antibody, was either from Sigma-Aldrich or from Cell Signaling Technology. Oligonucleotides were obtained from SigmaGenosys, USA. Quikchange site directed mutagenesis kit was from Stratagene, USA. Nitrocellulose paper was from PALL Gelmann. [γ-32P]ATP was from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India. Anti-glutathione-S-transferase (GST) antibody was from Santacruz Biotechnology Inc., USA. Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) was from New England Biolabs, USA. GST-CaMKIINα plasmid was a gift from Dr. P. Rangarajan, Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
2.2. Preparation of CaMKII
WT-α-CaMKII and E96A-α-CaMKII mutant were expressed in Sf21 or High Five insect cells. The crude insect cell lysate and the purified enzymes were prepared as described earlier [27,37,38].
GFP-α-CaMKII expressed in HEK-293 cells was also used in the experiments. WT and mutants, H282A and K21A, of GFP-α-CaMKII were used. The cells were lysed in RIPA buffer or in solution containing 50 mM Pipes (pH 7.0), 2 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF and protease inhibitor cocktail.
2.3. Expression of fusion proteins
CaMKIINα inhibitor protein, S1291A-GluN2A mutant (with amino acid sequences 1265-1301of GluN2A) and S1303A-GluN2B mutant (with amino acid sequence 1271-1311of GluN2B) were expressed in BL21(DE3)pLys strain of E. coli cells as GST fusion proteins. S1291A-GluN2A and S1303A-GluN2B mutants are the non-phosphorylatable forms of GluN2A and GluN2B sequences. These non-phosphorylatable forms are used to rule out any substrate phosphorylation occurring during the reaction and interfering with the binding. The expression and purification were carried out as published earlier [27,38]. The expressed proteins were purified using glutathione-sepharose column and were subsequently subjected to gel filtration to remove glutathione. S1 Fig shows the preparations of GST-S1291A-GluN2A, GST-S1303A-GluN2B and GST-CaMKIINα. GluN2B sequence containing the amino acids 1271–1311 was cloned into pET-32a vector to obtain His-GluN2B with His tag expressed at the C-terminal.
The concentrations of proteins were estimated using BCA (Bicinchoninic acid) method [39].
2.4. GST pulldown assay
CaMKII was incubated with either GST-GluN2B or GST-CaMKIINα or GST-GluN2A in binding buffer (50 mM Pipes, pH 7.0, 0.1% BSA, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween-20) either in presence or absence of 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 μM calmodulin for 1 hour at 4°C. The reaction mix was allowed to bind for 1 hour at 4°C to glutathione-sepharose beads which were washed in PBS (10 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate, 1.8 mM potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate, 0.14 M sodium chloride, 2.7 mM potassium chloride, pH 7.4). Alternatively, PBS washed glutathione-sepharose beads were first incubated with the GST-fusion proteins in PBS for 1 hour at 4°C, washed 4 times with PBS and were subsequently incubated with CaMKII in binding buffer for 1 hour at 4°C. After incubation, the glutathione-sepharose beads were again washed with PBS four times and were suspended in SDS sample buffer. The samples were heated in a boiling water bath for 4 minutes and were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot analysis using anti-α-CaMKII antibody and anti-GST antibody [40,41]. Blots were developed either by colour reaction of alkaline phosphatase conjugated secondary antibody or by enhanced chemiluminescence using horse radish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody. Densitometric quantitation of the blots were done after capturing images of the blots, using BioRad Quantity One software. In competition experiments, CaMKII was incubated with His-GluN2B and GST-CaMKIINα simultaneously.
In the pulldown assay of WT and E96A of α-CaMKII purified after expression in insect cells and WT, H282A and K21A expressed as GFP-α-CaMKII in HEK-293 cells, GST-GluN2B was first bound with washed glutathione-agarose beads. The GST-GluN2B bound beads were washed 4 times with PBS. Equal amounts of GST-GluN2B bound beads were allowed to bind to the WT or mutants of CaMKII. The autophosphorylated CaMKII samples for pulldown were prepared as described in the section 2.5 below except for using nonradioactive ATP. The pulldown was done under the same reaction conditions as that of the dephosphorylation experiments.
2.5. Autophosphorylation of Thr286-α-CaMKII and its dephosphorylation
Autophosphorylation of CaMKII was carried out in a reaction mix containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 1 μM γ32P-ATP, 3 mM CaCl2, 9 μM calmodulin and 0.164 mg/ml of purified WT-α-CaMKII. The reaction mix was preincubated at 30°C for 1 min and autophosphorylation was carried out for 30 seconds after initiating the reaction with ATP addition. The reaction was stopped with either SDS-PAGE sample buffer or with 10 μM staurosporine. For dephosphorylation experiments, the reaction mix after staurosporine addition was incubated with either 10 μM GST or 5.7 μM GST-CaMKIINα in presence of 22 μM calmodulin and 1 mM CaCl2 for 20 minutes at 4°C. GST was used as control for GST-CaMKIINα. The dephosphorylation was carried out at 30°C in presence of reaction buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 0.01% Brij 35, pH 7.5, 1 mM MnCl2 and 0.001 mg/ml PP1 for 20 minutes. The dephosphorylation was stopped by adding SDS sample buffer. The concentration of CaMKII after staurosporine addition was 0.162 mg/ml, after GST-CaMKIINα addition was 0.082 mg/ml and before PP1 addition was 0.065 mg/ml. Staurosporine concentration after adding GST or GST-CaMKIINα to the reaction mix was 4.9 μM and before adding PP1 was 4 μM.
In the experiments to find the rate of dephosphorylation, autophosphorylation of CaMKII was carried out in a reaction mix containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 1 μM γ32P-ATP, 3 mM CaCl2, 9 μM calmodulin andCaMKII. For CaMKII expressed in HEK-293 cells 22 μM calmodulin was used. The concentrations of purified CaMKII used for autophosphorylation were 0.0081 mg/ml and 0.0087 mg/ml respectively for WT and E96A. The concentrations of HEK-293 cell lysates used were 2.21 mg/ml for WT, 1.46 mg/ml for H282A and 1.35 mg/ml for K21A. The reaction mix was preincubated at 30°C for 1 min and autophosphorylation was carried out for 5 minutes for WT and 20 minutes for E96A expressed in insect cells. For GFP-α-CaMKII expressed in HEK-293 cells, reaction was carried out for 5 minutes each for WT, H282A and K21A. The reaction was stopped with 10 μM staurosporine and non-radioactive ATP was added to a final concentration of 1 mM. The reaction mix was incubated with either 10 μM of GST-S1291A-GluN2A or GST-S1303A-GluN2B in presence of 22 μM calmodulin and 1 mM CaCl2 for 20 minutes at 4°C. For dephosphorylation, a buffer of pH 7.5 was added which contributed the following components at the indicated final concentrations: 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 0.01% Brij 35 and 1 mM MnCl2. PP1 was added to a final concentration of 0.002 mg/ml and the reaction mix was incubated for the indicated times. For CaMKII expressed in HEK-293 cells, 0.0013–0.0033 mg/ml PP1 was used for dephosphorylation. The dephosphorylation was stopped by adding SDS sample buffer. The concentrations of the enzymes before PP1 addition were 0.0041 mg/ml and 0.0043 mg/ml for WT and E96A respectively and 1.11 mg/ml, 0.73 mg/ml, 0.68 mg/ml respectively for WT, H282A and K21A. Staurosporine concentration during incubation with GST-S1291A-GluN2A or GST-S1303A-GluN2B was 6.2 μM and before adding PP1 to the reaction mix was 5 μM. The reaction mix composition after addition of staurosporine became 49.5 mM Tris, 9.9 mM MgCl2, 9.9 mM DTT, 2.97 mM CaCl2; after addition of non-radioactive ATP became 48.5 mM Tris, 9.71 mM MgCl2, 9.71 mM DTT, 2.91 mM CaCl2; after addition of calmodulin became 41.2 mM Tris, 8.24 mM MgCl2, 8.24 mM DTT, 2.47 mM CaCl2; before addition of PP1 became 24.7 mM Tris, 4.95 mM MgCl2, 4.95 mM DTT, 1.48 mM CaCl2; 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 0.01% Brij 35, and 1 mM MnCl2. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE. The autoradiographic image of the gel was captured by phosphor imager. Phosphor image of the gel was quantitated using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
3. Results
3.1. GST-CaMKIINα inhibits dephosphorylation of CaMKII
As reported earlier [34,42] we also find that CaMKII binds to GST-CaMKIINα inhibitor protein similar to its binding to GST-GluN2B (Fig 1A). We find that the binding of GST-CaMKIINα to CaMKII after 20 min incubation is tight and irreversible as His-GluN2B, even after one hour of incubation, could not replace the bound GST-CaMKIINα (Fig 1B). In a competition experiment, His-GluN2B competes with GST-CaMKIINα for the T-site of CaMKII (Fig 1B). Since CaMKIINα binds to the T-site of CaMKII similar to GluN2B, we checked whether it influences dephosphorylation of phospho-Thr286 of α-CaMKII. Phosphorylation at Thr286 and its dephosphorylation by PP1 were demonstrated under our experimental conditions using antibody specific to phospho-Thr286-α-CaMKII (S2 Fig). For dephosphorylation experiments, autophosphorylation of CaMKII, carried out using γ32P-ATP, was stopped with staurosporine to prevent any further kinase reaction. It was found that the dephosphorylation of CaMKII by PP1 was reduced in presence of GST-CaMKIINα inhibitor protein (Fig 2).
3.2. Glu96 and His282 are key residues involved in mediating the GluN2B induced effects on CaMKII dephosphorylation
The dephosphorylation of CaMKII had been shown to be inhibited by GST-S1303A-GluN2B [9]. Here we show that the rate of dephosphorylation of WT-CaMKII in presence of GST-S1303A-GluN2B was slower compared to that in presence of GST-S1291A-GluN2A (Fig 3 and S5 Fig). The rate of dephosphorylation is calculated from the slope of the plot of phosphorylation level against the time. About three fold decrease in the rate of dephosphorylation of WT-CaMKII was observed in presence of GST-S1303A-GluN2B.
The position of Glu96 of α-CaMKII or its analogous residues in other isoforms of CaMKII in the active and autoinhibited states suggests that this residue is involved in ATP binding. The movement of the D-helix in the active structure swings Glu96 towards ATP binding site which is positioned away from the ATP binding site in the autoinhibited state [43,44]. In the CaMKIIδ/Ca2+/CaM complex Glu97 (Glu96 in α-CaMKII) is suitably positioned to coordinate with ATP [44]. We have previously shown that in the E96A-α-CaMKII mutant, GluN2B binding-induced modulation of catalysis that is seen in WT-α-CaMKII, is impaired [27] showing that Glu96 has the additional role of mediating the GluN2B induced structural changes. E96A-α-CaMKII binds to GluN2B although the extent of binding was modestly different compared to WT (S6 Fig). The binding to GluN2B by E96A was comparable to WT after autophosphorylation at Thr286 (S7 Fig). When the dephosphorylation of E96A-α-CaMKII was analysed, it was found that inhibition of dephosphorylation by GluN2B seen in WT was almost completely absent in the E96A mutant indicating that the GluN2B binding induced alterations in the structure of CaMKII did not occur in the mutant (Fig 3 and S5 Fig). This suggested that the same structural changes mediated by Glu96 of α-CaMKII upon binding of GluN2B may be responsible for catalytic modulation [27] as well as reduction of Thr286 dephosphorylation rate.
We checked the dephosphorylation rate of another mutant, H282A-α-CaMKII. His282 is a residue involved in anchoring the D-helix of α-CaMKII [43]. H282A mutation is reported to bring about interesting biochemical consequences in CaMKII [45,46]. Since His282 is also involved in maintaining the structure of D-helix similar to Glu96, we anticipated functional anomalies in the H282A-α-CaMKII mutant similar to the E96A mutant. We found that H282A-α-CaMKII exhibited Ca2+-independence for its autophosphorylation activity (S2 Fig) as well as for binding to GluN2B (data not shown). However its GluN2B binding showed specificity when compared to GluN2A (S3 Fig). Moreover, the mutant was comparable to WT for its binding to GluN2B whether it was autophosphorylated or not (S6 and S7 Figs). When Thr286dephosphorylation was studied, it was found that H282A-α-CaMKII also behaved like E96A mutant and showed similar rate of dephosphorylation with or without GluN2B (Fig 4 and S5 Fig). Lys21 is a residue in the ATP binding region. GluN2B binds to K21A-α-CaMKII mutant in its autophosphorylated and non-autophosphorylated states as seen in the pulldown assay (S4, S6 and S7 Figs). The K21A-α-CaMKII mutant showed decrease in the rate of dephosphorylation in presence of GluN2B compared to that in presence of GluN2A (Fig 4 and S5 Fig) showing that Lys21 does not appear to be involved in the GluN2B-mediated effects and that the effects seen with Glu96 and His282 are specific.
4. Discussion
CaMKII functions as a molecular switch supporting memory in PSD and a fine balance between the kinase and phosphatase is required for optimal functioning of the switch [13–15]. As reported earlier, we see that CaMKIINα binds to the T-site of CaMKII [34]. We also show that the binding of CaMKIINα inhibitor protein is irreversible and persistent even after calcium removal. GluN2B sequence inhibits the binding of CaMKIINα to CaMKII indicating that both could be interacting at the T-site. CaMKIINα may be involved in a feedback mechanism in CaMKII signaling in memory formation [47].
Lisman et al hypothesized that CaMKII-PP1 system may be acting as a bistable molecular switch forming the basis for molecular memory [13]. Both LTP and LTD, the two forms of synaptic plasticity are mediated by phospho-Thr286-CaMKII autonomous activity [48]. CaMKII-GluN2B interaction is required for LTP induction as well as maintenance of synaptic strength [49]. GluN2B interaction induced catalytic modulation of CaMKII stabilizes its activity against fluctuations in ATP concentrations [9,27]. Restrained dephosphorylation of phospho-Thr286-CaMKII when it is bound to GluN2B in vitro or in PSD [9,50] is considered as a fundamental characteristic of the CaMKII-GluN2B complex that allows it to support the maintenance of LTP [30]. In the crystal structure of the truncated CaMKII, regulatory region of one subunit binds to the active site of the neighbouring subunit. The N-terminal portion of the regulatory region (amino acids 276–291) of one subunit interacts with the C-lobe of the neighbouring kinase subunit. In the active state conformation, Arg283-Leu291 of the regulatory region of the subunit acting as substrate binds to the active site of the enzyme subunit [51]. Arg283 interacts electrostatically with an acidic region in the enzyme subunit positioning Thr286 into the active site [51]. It has been proposed that Thr286 of α-CaMKII in the phosphorylated state might also occupy the active site of the neighbouring subunit. When phospho-Thr286 is bound to the active site it could be inaccessible to phosphatase. GluN2B interaction might facilitate this binding thereby reducing dephosphorylation by PP1 [30]. His282 being close to Arg283, is likely to be involved in electrostatic interactions with docking sites in the acidic region of the enzyme subunit. Mutation of His282 to Ala might destabilize these interactions thereby exposing phospho-Thr286 to the action of phosphatase. Glu96 mutation to Ala might also perturb this interaction and expose phospho-Thr286 to phosphatase consistent with our data presented here. Indeed PP1 has been shown to be a suppressor of learning and memory [52]. Hence in addition to GluN2B, other endogenous T-site binding proteins that may also regulate the accessibility of the phosphatase to CaMKII could play a supportive role for the proper functioning of the CaMKII-PP1 switch. Our finding reported in the current manuscript that CaMKIINα inhibits dephosphorylation of phospho-Thr286-CaMKII suggests that CaMKIINα may thus support the CaMKII-PP1 molecular switch.
The dual consequences of the binding of GluN2B to the T-site of CaMKII described above, i.e. catalytic modulation and inhibition of dephosphorylation, could be the result of the same structural mechanism. We have previously shown that in the E96A mutant of α-CaMKII, the catalytic modulation is impaired eventhough the mutant binds GluN2B [27] indicating that Glu96 could be playing a role in the associated structural changes. The present study shows that this mutant is defective in exhibiting the GluN2B-induced reduction in dephosphorylation also (Fig 3) suggesting that the same structural mechanisms could be responsible for both the effects. In the inactive state of CaMKII the regulatory segment interacts to the helix αD which positions Glu96 away from the ATP binding site [43]. In the active state as the regulatory segment disengages, helix αD moves towards ATP so that Glu96 (Glu97 in δ-CaMKII) interacts with the hydroxyl groups of ribose rings of ATP [44]. We hypothesise that Glu96 of CaMKII might be participating in essential interactions that stabilize the GluN2B-induced altered conformation. His282 is also involved in anchoring D helix of α-CaMKII [43]. As expected, H282A-α-CaMKII showed similar results like E96A mutant in the regulation of dephosphorylation. It appears that modulation of catalysis of CaMKII as well as inhibition of dephosphorylation of phospho-Thr286-CaMKII are both consequences of the same set of structural changes in CaMKII that are induced by binding of ligands at the T-site.
This study reveals the commonality and cooperation of the functions of two key residues of α-CaMKII, Glu96 and His282 and also provides insights for further investigations on the regulation of CaMKII functions by GluN2B. The data on CaMKIINα also suggests additional physiological roles for this inhibitory protein of CaMKII.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Dr. P. Rangarajan, Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India for providing the vector encoding CaMKIINα. Technical support from Ms. Malini is acknowledged.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Council of Scientific and Industrial research, Government of India (http://www.csir.res.in/), Ref. No: 18-12/2011(ii)EU-V, KL; University Grants Commission, Government of India (http://www.ugc.ac.in/), UGC Award Letter No. F.2-56/2002/(II)EU-II, SDSP; and Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (www.rgcb.res.in), Intramural Funding, RVO, MM, SJ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Miller SG, Kennedy MB. Regulation of brain type II Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase by autophosphorylation: a Ca2+/-triggered molecular switch. Cell 1986; 44: 861–870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Giese KP, Fedorov NB, Filipkowski RK, Silva AJ. Autophosphorylation at Thr(286) of the alpha calcium-calmodulin kinase II in LTP and learning. Science 1998; 279: 870–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lisman J, Yasuda R, Raghavachari S. Mechanisms of CaMKII action in long-term potentiation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012; 13: 169–182. 10.1038/nrn3192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malinow R, Schulman H, Tsien RW. Inhibition of postsynaptic PKC or CaMKII blocks induction but not expression of LTP. Science 1989; 245: 862–866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Otmakhov N, Griffith LC, Lisman JE. Postsynaptic inhibitors of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II block induction but not maintenance of pairing-induced long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci. 1997; 17: 5357–5365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Silva AJ, Stevens CF, Tonegawa S, Wang YY. Deficient hippocampal long-term potentiation in alpha-calcium-calmodulin kinase-II mutant mice. Science 1992; 257: 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lisman JE. A mechanism for memory storage insensitive to molecular turnover: A bistable autophosphorylating kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985; 82: 3055–3057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Urakubo H, Sato M, Ishii S, Kuroda S. In vitro reconstitution of a CaMKII memory switch by an NMDA receptor-derived peptide. Biophys. J. 2014; 106: 1414–1420. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.01.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cheriyan J, Kumar P, Mayadevi M, Surolia A, Omkumar RV. Calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II bound to NMDA receptor 2B subunit exhibits increased ATP affinity and attenuated dephosphorylation. PLoS One 2011; 6:e16495 10.1371/journal.pone.0016495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dosemeci A, Reese TS. Inhibition of endogenous phosphatase in a postsynaptic density fraction allows extensive phosphorylation of the major postsynaptic density protein. J. Neurochem. 1993; 61: 550–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shields SM, Ingebritsen TS, Kelly PT. Identification of protein phosphatase-1 in synaptic junctions:Dephosphorylaton of endogenous calmodulin-dependent kinase-II and synapse- enriched phosphoproteins. J. Neurosci. 1985; 5: 3414–3422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Strack S, Barban MA, Wadzinski BE, Colbran RJ. Differential inactivation of postsynaptic density-associated and soluble Ca2+/calmodulindependent protein kinase II by protein phosphatases 1 and 2A. J. Neurochem. 1997; 68: 2119–2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lisman JE, Zhabotinsky AM. A model of synaptic memory: a CaMKII/PP1 switch that potentiates transmission by organizing an AMPA receptor anchoring assembly. Neuron. 2001; 31: 191–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bradshaw JM, Kubota Y, Meyer T, Schulman H. An ultrasensitive Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-protein phosphatase 1 switch facilitates specificity in postsynaptic calcium signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 10512–10517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miller P, Zhabotinsky AM, Lisman JE, Wang XJ. The stability of a stochastic CaMKII switch: Dependence on the number of enzyme molecules and protein turnover. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(4), e107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shen K, Meyer T. Dynamic control of CaMKII translocation and localization in hippocampal neurons by NMDA receptor stimulation. Science 1999; 284: 162–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leonard AS, Lim IA, Hemsworth DE, Horne MC, Hell JW. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 3239–3244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Strack S, Colbran RJ. Autophosphorylation-dependent targeting of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II by the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273; 20689–20692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hudmon A, Schulman H. Neuronal Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II: the role of structure and autoregulation in cellular function. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2002; 71: 473–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barria A, Malinow R. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptic plasticity by regulating binding to CaMKII. Neuron 2005; 48: 289–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sanhueza M, McIntyre CC, Lisman JE. Reversal of synaptic memory by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor. J. Neurosci. 2007; 27: 5190–5199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sanhueza M, Fernandez-Villalobos G, Stein IS, Kasumova G, Zhang P, Bayer KU, et al. Role of the CaMKII/NMDA receptor complex in the maintenance of synaptic strength. J. Neurosci. 2011; 31: 9170–9178. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1250-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhou Y, Takahashi E, Li W, Halt A, Wiltgen B, Ehninger D, et al. Interactions between the NR2B receptor and CaMKII modulate synaptic plasticity and spatial learning. J. Neurosci. 2007; 27: 13843–13853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gustin RM, Shonesy BC, Robinson SL, Rentz TJ, Baucum AJ, Sakrikar NJ, et al. Loss of Thr286 phosphorylation disrupts synaptic CaMKII alpha targeting, NMDAR activity and behavior in pre-adolescent mice. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2011; 47: 286–292. 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bayer KU, De Koninck P, Leonard AS, Hell JW, Schulman H. Interaction with the NMDA receptor locks CaMKII in an active conformation. Nature 2001; 411: 801–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bayer KU, LeBel E, De Koninck P. Transition from reversible to persistent binding of CaMKII to postsynaptic sites and NR2B. J. Neurosci. 2006; 26: 1164–1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pradeep KK, Cheriyan J, Suma Priya S, Rajeevkumar R, Mayadevi M, Praseeda M, et al. Regulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II catalysis by N-methyl-D-aspartate subunit 2B. Biochem. J. 2009; 419: 123–32. 10.1042/BJ20081707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Halt AR, Dallapiazza RF, Hell JW. CaMKII binding to GluN2B is critical during memory consolidation. EMBO J. 2012; 31:1203–1216. 10.1038/emboj.2011.482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanhueza M, Lisman J. The CaMKII/NMDAR complex as a molecular memory. Mol. Brain 2013; 6:10 10.1186/1756-6606-6-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lisman J, Raghavachari S. Biochemical principles underlying the stable maintenance of LTP by the CaMKII/NMDAR complex. Brain Res. 2015; 1621: 51–61. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chang BH, Mukherji S, Soderling TR. Characterization of a calmodulin kinase II inhibitor protein in brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 10890–10895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saha S, Datta K, Rangarajan P. Regulation of Ca2+/calmodulin kinase II inhibitor alpha (CaMKIINα) in virus-infected mouse brain. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co. 2006; 350: 444–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saha S, Datta K, Rangarajan P. Characterization of mouse neuronal Ca2+/calmodulin kinase II inhibitor alpha. Brain Res. 2007; 1148: 38–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vest RS, Davies KD, Leary HO, Port JD, Bayer KU. Dual mechanism of a natural CaMKII inhibitor. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007; 18: 5024–5033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Radwan´ska K, Tudor-Jones AA, Mizuno K, Pereira GS, Lucchesi W, Alfano I, et al. Differential regulation of CaMKII inhibitor beta protein expression after exposure to a novel context and during contextual fear memory formation. Genes Brain Behav. 2010; 9: 648–657. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00595.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lepicard EM, Mizuno K, Antunes-Martins A, von Hertzen LSJ, Giese KP. An endogenous inhibitor of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II is up-regulated during consolidation of fear memory. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006; 23: 3063–3070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Praseeda M, Pradeep KK, Krupa A, Sri Krishna S, Leena S, Rajeev Kumar R, et al. Influence of a mutation in the ATP-binding region of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II on its interaction with peptide substrates. Biochem. J. 2004; 378: 391–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Raveendran R, Sumapriya S, Mayadevi M, Steephan M, Santhoshkumar TR, Cheriyan J, et al. Phosphorylation status of the NR2B subunit of NMDA receptor regulates its interaction with calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Neurochem. 2009; 110: 92–105. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06108.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, et al. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal.Biochem. 1985; 150: 76–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979; 76: 4350–4354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gouet C, Aburto B, Vergara C, Sanhueza M. On the mechanism of synaptic depression induced by CaMKIIN, an endogenous inhibitor of CaMKII. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49293 10.1371/journal.pone.0049293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rosenberg OS, Deindl S, Sung RJ, Nairn AC, Kuriyan J. Structure of the autoinhibited kinase domain of CaMKII and SAXS analysis of the holoenzyme. Cell 2005; 123: 849–860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rellos P, Pike AC, Niesen FH, Salah E, Lee WH, von Delft F, et al. Structure of the CaMKIIδ/calmodulin complex reveals the molecular mechanism of CaMKII kinase activation. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8 (7):e1000426 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Brickey DA, Bann JG, Fong YL, Perrino L, Brennan RG, Soderling TR. Mutational analysis of the autoinhibitory domain of calmodulin kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 29047–29054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Smith MK, Colbran RJ, Brickey DA. Soderling TR. Functional determinants in the autoinhibitory domain of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Role of His282 and multiple basic residues. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 1761–1768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lucchesi W, Mizuno K, Giese KP. Novel insights into CaMKII function and regulation during memory formation. Brain Res. Bull. 2011; 85: 2–8. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Coultrap SJ, Freund RK, O'Leary H, Sanderson JL, Roche KW, Dell'Acqua ML, et al. Autonomous CaMKII mediates both LTP and LTD using a mechanism for differential substrate site selection. Cell Rep. 2014; 6(3): 431–7. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barcomb K, Hell JW, Benke TA, Bayer KU. The CaMKII/GluN2B interaction maintains synaptic strength. J. Biol. Chem. 2016; 291: 16082–9. 10.1074/jbc.M116.734822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mullasseril P, Dosemeci A, Lisman JE, Griffith LC. A structural mechanism for maintaining the ‘on-state’ of the CaMKII memory switch in the post-synaptic density. J. Neurochem. 2007; 103: 357–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chao LH, Pellicena P, Deindl S, Barclay LA, Schulman H, Kuriyan J. Intersubunit capture of regulatory segments is a component of cooperative CaMKII activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17(3):264–72 10.1038/nsmb.1751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Genoux D, Haditsch U, Knobloch M, Michalon A, Storm D, Mansuy IM. Protein phosphatase 1 is a molecular constraint on learning and memory. Nature 2002; 418: 970–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.O'Leary H, Liu WH, Rorabaugh JM, Coultrap SJ, Bayer KU. Nucleotides and phosphorylation bi-directionally modulate Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) binding to the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit GluN2B. J. Biol. Chem. 2011; 286(36): 31272–81. 10.1074/jbc.M111.233668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.