Abstract
AIMS--To assess the role and value of electron microscopy in the diagnosis of renal disease. METHODS--Retrospective evaluation of 88 renal biopsy specimens received for primary diagnosis by assessment of the contribution of electron microscopy to the final diagnosis in the knowledge of the light microscopy and immunofluorescence findings. RESULTS--Electron microscopy had an important diagnostic role in 75% of cases and was essential or necessary for diagnosis in 25%. In 25% of cases electron microscopy was considered unhelpful in diagnosis. CONCLUSION--Electron microscopy has an integral role in the diagnosis of renal disease, and tissue should be taken for electron microscopy in all cases if possible. In some selected cases once the light microscopy and immunofluorescence findings are known it may be possible to forego electron microscopic examination. Electron microscopy is particularly useful in the differential diagnosis of minimal change disease and the nephrotic syndrome.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ben-Bassat M., Stark H., Robson M., Rosenfeld J. Value of routine electron microscopy in the differential diagnosis of the nephrotic syndrome. Pathol Microbiol (Basel) 1974;41(1):26–40. doi: 10.1159/000162561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collan Y., Klockars M., Heino M. Revision of light-microscopic kidney biopsy diagnosis in glomerular disease. Nephron. 1978;20(1):24–31. doi: 10.1159/000181192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dische F. E., Parsons V. Experience in the diagnosis of glomerulonephritis using combined light microscopical, ultrastructural and immunofluorescence techniques--an analysis of 134 cases. Histopathology. 1977 Sep;1(5):331–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1977.tb01672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muehrcke R. C., Mandal A. K., Gotoff S. P., Isaacs E. W., Volini F. I. The clinical value of electron microscopy in renal disease. Arch Intern Med. 1969 Aug;124(2):170–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegel N. J., Spargo B. H., Kashgarian M., Hayslett J. P. An evaluation of routine electron microscopy in the examination of renal biopsies. Nephron. 1973;10(4):209–215. doi: 10.1159/000180189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skjørten F., Halvorsen S. A study of the value of resin-embedded semi-thin sections and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of renal biopsies. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1981 Jul;89(4):257–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1981.tb00219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spargo B. H. Practical use of electron microscopy for the diagnosis of glomerular disease. Hum Pathol. 1975 Jul;6(4):405–420. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(75)80060-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tighe J. R., Jones N. F. The diagnostic value of routine electron microscopy of renal biopsies. Proc R Soc Med. 1970 May;63(5):475–477. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]