Erratum
After publication of this work [1] it was noticed that the incorrect versions of Figs. 4 and 5 were used.
Fig. 4.

Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) for examination of the bladder neck (n = 383). Acceptable failure rate set at 0.01 and unacceptable failure rate set at 0.03. Type I and II error rate 0.1. Each horizontal line on the y-axis represents a control line (h = 1.96)]
Fig. 5.

Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) score for completion of full flexible cystoscopy (n = 383). Acceptable failure rate set at 0.05 and unacceptable failure rate at 0.15. Type I and II error rates 0.10. Each horizontal line on the y-axis represents a control line (h = 1.81)]
Please see below the correct versions of Figs. 4 and 5.
We apologise for these errors.
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12894-016-0143-9.
Reference
- 1.MacKenzie KR, Aning J. Defining competency in flexible cystoscopy: a novel approach using cumulative Sum analysis. BMC Urol. 2016;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0143-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
