Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular Biology Research Communications logoLink to Molecular Biology Research Communications
. 2014 Sep;3(3):165–174.

Evaluation of antioxidant potential and reduction capacity of some plant extracts in silver nanoparticles' synthesis

Vahid Goodarzi 1, Hajar Zamani 1, Leila Bajuli 1, Ali Moradshahi 1,*
PMCID: PMC5019224  PMID: 27843980

Abstract

The green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles is an active research area in nanotechnology. In the present study, antioxidant potential, total reducing capacity and silver nanoparticles' (Ag NPs) synthetic potential of methanolic leaf extracts of seven plant species were evaluated and compared. Antioxidant capacity, expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents g-1 DW (µmol TE g-1 DW), ranged from 116.0 to 1.80. The plants Rosmarinus sp. and Zataria Multiflora showed highest antioxidant capacities with IC50 of 1.07 and 1.22 mg ml-1, respectively. Total reducing capacity ranged from 7.6 to 0.17 mg gallic acid equivalent to g-1 DW (mg GAE g-1 DW). Plants with high antioxidant potentials also showed higher total reducing capacity. In fact, the order of the plants' reducing capacity was similar to that of their antioxidant potential. The same two plant species, i.e., Zataria Multiflora and Rosmarinus sp, with high reducing capacities, showed higher potentials for Ag NPs synthesis. It is concluded that reducing substances in the extracts contribute significantly to the antioxidant potential of the tested plant species, and plants with a high reducing capacity are excellent sources for the green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. In addition, synthetic antioxidants have adverse effects on human health; therefore, to benefit more from the health promoting properties of plant species, evaluating their novel natural antioxidants is recommended.

Key Words: Antioxidant potential, Reduction capacity, DPPH, Folin-Ciocalteu, Silver nanoparticles

INTRODUCTION

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced during normal cellular metabolism such as respiration and photosynthesis and are scavenged by antioxidant defense systems of the organisms [1-7]. Under different stress conditions, the rate of ROS production overrides the rate of ROS removal, leading to oxidative stress in the organisms [1,8-11].Oxidative stress generated by ROS damages macromolecules such as proteins, lipids and nucleic acids and often leads to metabolic dysfunction and cell death [6,12-14].

Due to their beneficial health effects, the use of antioxidants as food supplements or ingredients has recently increased. Since synthetic antioxidants may have negative health effects, many plant species are investigated for novel natural antioxidants [15-19]. Commercially available natural antioxidants are often derived from terrestrial plants. Many plants contain large amounts of antioxidants such as phenolic compounds, vitamin E, vitamin C and carotenoids [20-24].

The estimation of antioxidant potential and total reducing capacity of living organisms such as algae and plants is carried out by different assay methods [25-28]. These methods are classified as electron and hydrogen-atom transfer-based assays. DPPH, FRAP and Folin-Ciocalteu assays are examples of electron transfer-based assays [29,30]. In these redox reactions, the antioxidants present in the sample transfer electrons to oxidants such as DPPH radical or to the metal ion present in Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Therefore, by recording changes in absorbance at a specific wavelength, the total reducing capacity of a sample can be calculated from a standard curve.

Redox reaction also occurs during metallic nanoparticle synthesis from corresponding aqueous salts. Extracts from different organisms contain reducing substances which transfer electrons to the metal ions producing metallic nanoparticles [31-33]. Plants with higher total reducing substances should be able to produce higher concentrations of metallic nanoparticles. One novel Ag NPs-based assay has been proposed by Szydlowska-Czerniak et al. [6] to determine total reducing capacity. Correlations between the suggested assay with electron transfer-based assays such as DPPH and F-C assays, were shown to be significant (0.76 – 0.85, P˂0.05). Moreover, the plots of absorbance at 410 versus concentrations of standard phenolic compounds were found to be linear.

In the present study antioxidant potential and total reducing capacity of methanolic leaf extracts of seven plant species were determined and compared. The hypothesis that extracts with higher total reducing capacity are more potent in green synthesis of Ag NPs was evaluated and plants with high Ag NPs synthetic potential were identified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents and extraction procedure:All reagents were of analytical grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (Darmstadt, Germany).

Aerial parts of collected plants were washed and dried at room temperature in the dark. One gram of powdered leaves of each plant was extracted with 30 ml methanol for one day at room temperature in the dark. After centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatants were used to determine antioxidant and total reducing capacity. For green synthesis of Ag NPs, one gram of each powdered leaf in 30 ml deionized water was boiled for 5 min. After centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 15 min, the supernatant was diluted with deionized water to give extract concentrations corresponding to 1.0 to 30 mg ml-1 of the original plant material to be used for the Ag NPs synthesis.

Measurement of radical scavenging capacity by DPPH assay: DPPH assay was performed as described by Thaipong et al. [34]. In brief, 150 µl standard solution or sample was added to 2850 µL DPPH solution and kept in the dark. After 60 min, the absorbance of the solution was measured at 515 nm. Trolox, in the concentration range of 25 to 800 nmol in methanol, was used to construct the calibration curve. Radical scavenging is reported as µmol trolox equivalent per gram dry weight (µmol TE g-1 DW). The percent inhibition of the DPPH radical by one ml of the extracts was calculated according to the following equation˸

% inhibition = [(Ac -As) / Ac] ×100,

where Ac is the control absorbance at 515 nm and As is the sample absorbance after 60 min of incubation.

The methanolic extract concentration that scavenged 50% of the DPPH radicals (IC50) was calculated from the DPPH absorbance plot at 515 nm versus the extract concentration.

Determination of total reducing capacity: Folin-Ciocalteu (F-C) assay was performed as described by Velioglu et al. [21]. In brief, 200 µl standard solution or sample was mixed with 1.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent previously diluted tenfold with distilled water. After 5 min, 1.5 ml of 6% (w/v) sodium bicarbonate solution was added to the solution. The mixture was kept for 90 min at room temperature and the absorbance was reordered at 750 nm. Gallic acid was used as the standard in the concentration range of 25-200 µg ml-1.

Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: For green synthesis of Ag NPs, 100 µl of each sample was added to and mixed thoroughly with 2.0 ml of 1.0 mM AgNO3 at room temperature. Synthesis of Ag NPs after 3 hrs of incubation was determined by recording absorbance at 410 nm using a double beam spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU160A). The reaction was carried out at ambient temperature and pH=7.0.

Statistical analysis:Each sample had three replicates and data )shown as mean ± SE and means( were compared using SPSS 16.0. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine significant differences at p < 0.05. Correlation analysis was carried out using Pearson’s correlation and regression analysis using SPSS version 16.0.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Antioxidant capacity: Table 1 shows antioxidant capacity together with percent inhibition of DPPH radicals and IC50 of the methanolic leaf extracts of seven plant species. Antioxidant capacity ranged from 116.0 to 1.8 µmol TE g-1 DW with Rosmarinus sp. and Zataria Multiflora having the highest antioxidant capacity. Percent inhibition of DPPH radicals followed the same order as antioxidant capacity and ranged from 93.4 to 3.03 percent. IC50 of 1.07 to 25.20 mg ml-1 was obtained for tested extracts which were inversely related to antioxidant capacity. The plots of absorbance of DPPH radicals at 515 nm versus extract concentrations were linear for all the extracts with R2˃0.98 shown for the plants Zataria Multiflora and Francoeuria undulate (Fig. 1). For Zataria Multiflora, about 3.0 mg ml-1 was needed to reduce absorbance from 1.06 to 0.09, whereas for Francoeuria undulate, about 15 mg ml-1 was required for the same reduction in absorbance at 515 nm.

Table 1.

Antioxidant capacity, percent DPPH inhibition and IC50 of leaf extracts of seven plant species. Data are mean ± SE. In each column values with different letters are significant at P<0.05.

Plant material Trolox equivalents mol g-1 DW)µ) % Inhibition of DPPH IC50
( mg ml-1 )
Rosmarinus sp. 116.00±0.001a 93.40±0.17%a 1.07±0.01a
Zataria multiflora 108.00±0.008b 86.65±0.85%b 1.22±0.04a
Pelargonium graveolens 36.00±0.007c 27.88±2.18%c 3.56±0.08b
Chamaemelum nobil 7.60±0.006d 20.65±0.31%c 4.74±0.04c
Frenqueri aundulate 4.20±0.001e 17.56±0.11%d 6.86±0.11d
Achillea wilhemsii 3.00±0.009f 11.49±0.46%e 7.61±0.16e
Carthamus tinctorius L. 1.80±0.005g 3.03±0.45%f 25.20±0.24f
Open in a new tab

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effects of different concentrations of methanolic leaf extracts of Zataria multiflora and Francoeuria undulate on DPPH absorbance at 515 nm

Total reducing capacity: The results of the Folin-Ciocalteu assay which measures total reducing capacity and also gives an estimate of total phenolics content are shown in Table 2. The order of total reducing capacity was very similar to that of antioxidant capacity indicating close relationships between these two parameters in the tested plant species. Total reducing capacity ranged from 7.60 to 0.17 mg GAE g-1 DW. The plots of extract concentrations versus absorbance at 750 nm were linear for all extracts shown for Zataria Multiflora and Francoeuria undulate in Figure 2. For Zataria Multiflora, about 3 mg ml-1 was required to increase absorbance at 750 from zero to about 1.0, whereas for Francoeuria undulate, about 21 mg ml-1 of extract was required to get the same increase in absorbance.

Table 2.

Total reducing capacity and AgNPs synthetic potential of methanolic leaf extracts of seven plant species. Each value is mean± SE. Values with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05. AgNPs production by 2 mg ml-1 of the extracts was compared after 3 hrs of incubation.

Plant material Total reducing capacity
(mg GAE g-1 DW)		 AgNPs synthesis
(absorbance at 410 nm)
Zataria multiflora 7.60±0.33a 0.92±0.17a
Rosmarinus sp. 6.00±0.29b 1.07±0.16a
Pelargonium graveolens 2.96±0.11c 0.24±0.07b
Chamaemelum nobil 0.56±0.16d 0.21±0.025b
Frenqueri aundulate 0.46±0.17d 0.40±0.022b
Achillea wilhemsii 0.42±0.00d 0.36±0.20c
Carthamus tinctorius L. 0.17±0.05e 0.23±0.08b
Open in a new tab

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effects of different extract concentrations of Zataria multiflora and Francoeuria undulate on Folin-Ciocalteu reagent at 750 nm

Silver nanoparticles synthesis: Synthesis of Ag NPs with 2 mg ml-1 of the leaf extracts was determined at 410 nm which is the wavelength of maximum absorption of Ag NPs (Fig. 3). As shown in Table 2, based on the Ag NPs synthetic potential, the plants could be divided into two groups. Zataria Multiflora and Rosmarinus sp., with high total reducing capacity, were more potent in Ag NPs synthesis, whereas plants with lower total reducing capacity showed less potential for the synthesis of Ag NPs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

UV-Vis spectrum of silver nanoparticles synthesized due to the reduction of silver ions by the leaf extracts

Developing high-yield, low cost, nontoxic and environmentally friendly methods for metallic nanoparticles synthesis [31] is an increasing need. Reduction of silver ions to Ag NPs by plant extracts have been reported by several investigators [35-41]. Stable Ag NPs in the size range of 16 to 40 nm has been reported using geranium leaf extracts. Terpenoids in the extract contributed to the reduction of silver ions to Ag NPs [35]. Using five plant leaf extracts, Song and Kim [33] reported a rapid green synthesis of Ag NPs. Magnolia leaf extract was the best reducing agent in terms of synthetic rate. Using Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf broth, Shankar et al. [42] showed the synthesis of pure metallic nanoparticles of silver and gold. Green synthesis of Ag NPs has also been reported using curry leaf (Murraya koenigii) extract [32]. Switch grass (Panicum virgutum) extract mediated the green synthesis of Ag NPs from a silver nitrate solution at ambient temperature [43]. Since antioxidant potential and total reducing capacity vary among different plant species [44-46], it is expected that plants with higher reducing capacity are more potent in reducing metallic ions to metallic nanoparticles. In the present study, plant extracts with higher antioxidant potentials and higher reducing capacity caused higher absorbance at 410 nm, which is indicative of a higher level of Ag NPs production. Phenolic compounds are the major constituents of antioxidants of most plant species and their antioxidant activity is mainly due to their redox properties. As a result, they can act as reducing agents in neutralizing free radicals [47,48] and the reduction of metallic ions to metallic nanoparticles. Similar to the present study, Schwarz et al. [28] showed that rosemary extract with high phenolic compounds was one of the best antioxidant sources among the plant extracts tested. This plant can therefore, be used efficiently as a reducing agent in the synthesis of metallic nanoparticles.

Plants with high antioxidant and reducing capacities are not only useful for the green synthesis of metallic NPs, but also for the prevention or reduction of the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during normal cellular metabolism of plants and animals [1,7]. Natural antioxidants such as rosemary, sage and zataria are already used commercially as antioxidant additives or nutritional supplements [49]. In the present study, the two plants Rosmarinus sp. and Zataria Multiflora showed the highest antioxidant and reducing capacities. More plant species need to be evaluated for their novel antioxidants and reducing substances; first, to benefit from their potential health advantages including protection against disorders such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases and next, to synthesize green and eco-friendly metallic nanoparticles.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Shiraz University Research Council for financially supporting this research.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  • 1.karuppanapandian T, Moon JC, Kim C, Manoharan K, Kim W. Reactive oxygen species in plants: their generation, signal transduction, and scavenging mechanisms. Aust J Crop Sci. 2011;6:709–725. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahmad P, Sarwat M, Sharma S. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants and signaling in plants. J Plant Biol. 2008;51:167–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends plant Sci. 2004;9:490–498. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kratchanova M, Denev P, Ciz M, Lojek A, Mihailow A. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of medicinal plants containing polyphenol compounds: comparison of two extraction systems. Acta Biochimica Polonica. 2010;57:229–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shan B, Yizhong Z, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant capacity of 26 spice extracts and characterization of their phenolic constituents. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:7749–7759. doi: 10.1021/jf051513y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Szydlowska-Czerniak A, Amarowicz R, Szlyk E. Antioxidant capacity of rapeseed meal and rapeseed oils enriched with meal extract. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2010;112:750–760. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arora A, Sairam PK, Srivastave GC. Oxidative stress and antioxidative systems in plants. Curr Sci. 2002;82:1227–1238. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fang YZ, Yang S, Wu G. Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition. 2002;18:827–879. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00916-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sohn YG, Lee BH, Kang KY, Lee JJ. Effects of NaCl stress on germination, antioxidant responses, and proline content in two rice cultivars. J Plant Biol. 2005;48:201–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cho UH, Park JO. Changes in hydrogen peroxide content and activities of antioxidant enzymes in tomato seedlings exposed to mercury. J Plant Biol. 1999;42:41–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oktay M, Gulcin I, Kufreviog I. Determination of in vitro antioxidant activity of fennel (Foeniculum Vulgare) Seed extracts. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2003;36:263–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Conforti F, Sosa S, Marrelli M, Menichini F, Statti GA, Uzunov D, Tubaro A, Menichini F. The protective ability of Mediterranean dietary plants against the oxidative damage: the role of radical oxygen species in inflammation and the polyphenol, flavonoid and sterol contents. Food Chem. 2009;112:587–594. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marxen K, Vanselow KH, Lippemeier S, Hintze R, Ruser A, Hansen UP. Determination of DPPH radical oxidation caused by methanolic extracts of some microalgal species by linear regression analysis of spectrophotometric measurements. Sensors. 2007;7:2080–2095. doi: 10.3390/s7102080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koleva II, van Beek TA, Linssen JPH, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem Anal. 2002;13:8–17. doi: 10.1002/pca.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barlow SM. Toxicological aspects of antioxidants used as food additives. In: Hudson BIF, editor. Food antioxidants. Springer Netherlands; 1999. pp. 253–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martinez-Tome M, Jimenez AM, Ruggieri S, Frega N, Strabbioli R, Murcia MA. Antioxidant properties of mediterranean spices compared with common food additives. J Food Protect. 2001;64:1412–1419. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.9.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li HB, Cheng KW, Wong CC, Fan KW, Chen F, Jiang Y. Evaluation of antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content of different fractions of selected microalgae. Food Chem. 2007;102:771–776. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Javanmardi J, Stushnoff C, Locke E, Vivanco JM. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Iranian Ocimum accessions. Food Chem. 2003;83:547–550. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Velioglu YS, Mazza G, Gao L, Oomah BD. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. J Agr Food Chem. 1998;46:4113–4117. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu D, Shi J, Colina Ibarra A, Kakuda Y, Xue SJ. The scavenging capacity and synergistic effects of lycopene, vitamin E, vitamin C, and β-carotene mixtures on the DPPH free radical. LWT- Food Sci Technol. 2008;41:1344–1349. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jung CH, Maeder V, Funk F, Frey B, Sticher H, Frosserd E. Release of phenols from Lupinus albus L. roots exposed to Cu and their possible role in Cu detoxification. Plant Soil. 2003;252:301–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ayan AK, Cirak C, Yanar O. Variations in total phenolics during ontogenic, morphogenetic, and diurnal cycles in Hypericum species from Turkey. J Plant Biol. 2006;49:432–439. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ciz M, Cizova H, Denev P, Kratchanova M, Slavov A, Lojek A. Different methods for control and comparison of the antioxidant properties of vegetables. Food Control. 2010;21:518–523. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singleton V, Rossi J. Colorimetery of total phenolics with phosphomolibdic-phosphotungastic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16:144–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miller NJ, Rice-Evans C. Spectrophotometric determination of antioxidant activity. Redox Rep. 1996;2(3):161–171. doi: 10.1080/13510002.1996.11747044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schwarz K, Bertelsen G, Nissen LR, Gardner PT, Heinonen MI, Hopia A, Huynh-Ba T, Lambelet P, McPhail D, Skibsted LH, Tijburg L. Investigation of plant extracts for the protection of processed foods against lipid oxidation. Comparison of antioxidant assays based on radical scavenging, lipid oxidation and analysis of the principal antioxidant compounds. Eur Food Res Technol. 2001;212:319–328. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Everette JD, Bryant QM, Green AM, Abbey YA, Wangila GW, Walker RB. Thorough study of reactivity of various compound classes toward the Folin- Ciocalteu reagent. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:8139–8144. doi: 10.1021/jf1005935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:1841–1856. doi: 10.1021/jf030723c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thakkar KN, Mhatre SS, Parikh RY. Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2009;6:257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Christensen L, Vivekanandhan S, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using murraya koenigii (curry leaf): an investigation on the effect of broth concentration in reduction mechanism and particle size. Adv Mat Lett. 2011;2:429–434. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Song JY, Kim BS. Rapid biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant leaf extracts. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2009;32:79–84. doi: 10.1007/s00449-008-0224-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thaipong K, Boonprakob U, Crosby K, Cisneros-Zevallos L, Hawkins Byrne D. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J Food Comp Anal. 2006;19:669–675. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shankar S, Ahmad A, Sastry M. Geranium leaf assisted biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19(6):1627–1631. doi: 10.1021/bp034070w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chandran SP, Chaudhary M, Pasricha R, Ahmad A, Sastry M. Synthesis of gold nanotriangles and silver nanoparticles using Aloe vera plant extract. Biotechnol Prog. 2006;22:577–583. doi: 10.1021/bp0501423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mason C, Vivekanandhan S, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) extract mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles. World J Nano Sci Eng. 2012;2:47–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Song JY, Kim BS. Biological synthesis of biometallic Au/Ag nanoparticles using persimmon (Diopyros Kaki) leaf extracts. Korean J chem Eng. 2008;25:808–811. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sathishkumar K, Seneha K, Won SW, Cho CW, Kim S, Yun YS. Cinnamon zeylanicum bark extract and powder mediated green synthesis of nano-crystalline silver particles and its bactericidal activity. Colloids and surface B: Biointerfaces. 2009;73:332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Babu SA, Prabu HG. Synthesis of Ag NPs using the extract of Calotropis Procera flower at room temperature. Mater lett. 2011;65:1675–1677. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Phillip D. Mangifera Indica leaf-assisted biosynthesis of well-dispersed silver nanoparticles. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectros. 2011;78:327–331. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2010.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shankar SS, Rai A, Ahmad A, Sastry M. Rapid synthesis of Au, Ag, and bimetallic Au core Ag shell nanoparticles using Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf broth. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;275:496–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mason C, Vivekanandhan S, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatun) extract mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles. World J nano Sci Eng. 2012;2:47–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wojdylo A, Oszmianski J, Czemerys R. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32 selected herbs. Food Chem. 2007;105:940–949. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Katalinic V, Milos M, Kulisic T, Jukic M. Screening of 70 medicinal Plant extracts for antioxidant capacity and total phenols. Food Chem. 2006;94:550–557. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stef DS, Gergen I, Trasca TL, Monica H, Stef L, Biron MG. Total antioxidant and radical scavenging capacities for different medicinal herbs. Romanian Biotechnol Lett. 2009;14:4704–4709. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI, Vourela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M. Antioxidant activity of palnt extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:3954–3962. doi: 10.1021/jf990146l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rice-evans CA, Miller NJ, Bolwell PG, Bramley PM, Pridham JB. The relative antioxidant activities of plant-derived polyphenolic flavonoids. Free Radical Res. 1995;22:375–383. doi: 10.3109/10715769509145649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schuler P. Natural antioxidants exploited commercially. In: Hudson BJF, editor. Food Antioxidants. London: Elsevier; 1990. pp. 99–170. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Biology Research Communications are provided here courtesy of Shiraz University

RESOURCES