Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2016 Jul 14;18(15):3910–3913. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01952

Silylaryl Halides Can Replace Triflates as Aryne Precursors

Milad Mesgar 1, Olafs Daugulis 1,*
PMCID: PMC5020908  NIHMSID: NIHMS814656  PMID: 27415183

Abstract

Silylaryl bromides and iodides can be prepared in one step from commercially available starting materials. Arynes can be generated from these compounds under conditions nearly identical to those employed for silylaryl triflates. Three distinct transformations, ortho-arylation of N-tritylanilines, intermolecular addition of arynes to amides, and reaction of ureas with arynes, were shown to be successful for the new aryne precursors. The main advantage of silylaryl halides relative to silyl aryl triflates is their one-step preparation from commercially available starting materials.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms814656u1.jpg


Arynes are important reactive intermediates in the synthesis of bioactive molecules,1 organic materials,2 and catalysts.3 Early methods for aryne generation involve the reaction of aryl halides with strong bases (Scheme 1, A).4 The harsh conditions used in these methods limit their use in synthesis. Subsequently, several other methods for aryne generation have been reported (Scheme 1, B–D). Oxidation of aminotriazoles or other N–N bond-containing substances generates arynes.5 Benzenediazonium 2-carboxylate decomposes to benzyne under extremely mild conditions.6 Recently, hexahydro Diels–Alder reactions reactions were shown to generate arynes.7

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Generation of Aryne Intermediates

Currently, the most widely used method for aryne generation involves the reaction of silylaryl triflates with fluoride reported by Kobayashi in 1983.8a An extension of this method was disclosed in 1995, when Kitamura showed that aryliodonium salts generate arynes in the presence of fluoride ion.8b The Kobayashi method has several advantages over other aryne generation procedures. Silylaryl triflates are bench stable and allow aryne generation under relatively mild and nonbasic conditions.8 However, only a few silylaryl triflates are commercially available. Their preparation requires somewhat lengthy synthetic procedures starting from o-bromophenols, which are of limited commercial availability as well.9 In contrast, aryl halides are cheap, and a large number of them are commercially available. Their use in aryne generation, however, requires strong amide or alkoxide bases that are not compatible with many functional groups. An ideal aryne source would have availability close to that of an aryl halide and would form benzynes under mild conditions similar to those employed for silylaryl triflates. The ease of aryne formation from ortho-metalated species such as 3 and 4 should be related to the strength of the conjugate acid of the leaving group (Scheme 2). Examination of pKa values of hydrogen halides and triflic acid in DMSO shows that the acidity of HI is close to that of CF3SO3H, while HCl is insufficiently acidic.10a,b Reaction of silylaryl triflate with a metal fluoride generates ortho-metalated aryl triflate that rapidly decomposes to form aryne. It is well-known that (2-bromophenyl)lithium eliminates LiBr at temperatures as low as −100 °C.10c The corresponding (2-iodophenyl)lithium should be even less stable. Consequently, ortho-silylated aryl bromides and iodides should be capable of generating arynes under mild conditions. We report here (1) a one-step synthesis of silylaryl bromides and iodide from commercially available starting materials and (2) use of these species in three types of reactions, where they show results comparable to those obtained with silylaryl triflates.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Decomposition of Intermediates

A few examples of silylaryl halide use in aryne generation have been reported.11 In 1973, Cunico and Dexheimer reported that (2-halophenyl)- and [2-(tosyloxy)phenyl]trimethylsilanes are capable of generating arynes in the presence of KO-t-Bu or fluoride ion.11a However, yields of products derived from arynes were low. In 2010, Harrity and Browne first showed that arynes can be efficiently generated from silylaryl iodides.11b The silyl aryl iodides were prepared by cycloaddition of methyl coumalate with (trimethylsilyl)iodoacetylene as a 2:1 mixture of regioisomers. It would be more convenient if aryne precursors were synthesized in one step from commercial aryl halides that are available with a variety of functional groups. Lithium tetramethylpiperidide (TMPLi) has been used for in situ deprotonation/silylation of aromatic nitriles, esters, and pyridine derivatives.12 Provided that the (2-haloaryl)lithium lifetime is sufficiently long, it should be possible to trap these intermediates to afford the desired silylaryl halides.13 We initially attempted in situ trapping of (2-haloaryl)lithium reagents with chlorotrimethylsilane. Unfortunately, these reactions gave variable yields and were not successful with many substrates due to the competitive decomposition of (2-bromoaryl)lithium intermediate. Consistent results were obtained when sterically smaller and more electrophilic dimethylsilyl chloride (DMSCl) was used for in situ quenching. Best results were obtained by performing the reaction at −110 °C with subsequent warming. The scope of aryl halide silylation is presented in Table 1. All reactions were run on at least 10 mmol scale. The reaction works well with methoxy-substituted aryl bromides. Thus, 1-bromo-3-methoxybenzene gave silylation product in 94% yield (entry 1), while trimethoxybromobenzene afforded silylated species in 55% yield (entry 2). 2-Bromo-1,4-dimethoxybenzene reacted to give the dimethylsilyl derivative in 94% yield (entry 3). Products of entries 1 and 3 are alternative aryne precursors that can be used instead of 2-methoxy-6-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl triflate and 2,5-dimethoxy-6-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl triflate, which are among the most frequently used, functionalized aryne precursors.14

Table 1.

Scope of Arene Silylationa

graphic file with name nihms814656u2.jpg

entry ArX product yield, %
1 graphic file with name nihms814656t1.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t2.jpg 94
2 graphic file with name nihms814656t3.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t4.jpg 55
3 graphic file with name nihms814656t5.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t6.jpg 94
4 graphic file with name nihms814656t7.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t8.jpg 51
5 graphic file with name nihms814656t9.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t10.jpg 76
6b graphic file with name nihms814656t11.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t12.jpg 35c
7 graphic file with name nihms814656t13.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t14.jpg 76
8 graphic file with name nihms814656t15.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t16.jpg 95
9b graphic file with name nihms814656t17.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t18.jpg 81
a

ArX (10–20 mmol), ClSiHMe2 (100–300 mmol), TMPLi (25–50 mmol), solvent (60–120 mL), −110 °C; warm to between −10 and −80 °C. Yields are isolated yields. See the Supporting Information for details.

b

Chlorotrimethylsilane used.

c

Disilylation product also isolated (47%).

Other bromoarenes that possess groups assisting metalation can also be silylated successfully. Thus, 1-bromo-3-chlorobenzene is silylated in 51% yield (entry 4). Similarly, 1-bromo-3-fluorobenzene reacted to afford the product in 76% yield (entry 5). Silylation of 2-fluoro-5-bromoanisole gave a mixture mono-and disilylation products, from which monosilylation product was isolated in 35% yield (entry 6). The disilylated species was isolated in 47% yield. In this case, reaction with trimethylsilyl chloride gave better results. Silylation of 3-(trifluoromethyl)-bromobenzene was successful, affording the desired product in 76% yield (entry 7). Somewhat surprisingly, 3-iodoanisole was silylated in an excellent 95% yield (entry 8). The ester of N,N-dimethylsulfamoic acid was also successfully silylated by trimethylsilyl chloride (entry 9). Efforts to silylate bromobenzene did not give a reproducible yield of product. Tamborski reported the synthesis and reactivity of (o-bromophenyl) lithium in 1980.10c A modification of this method afforded 1-bromo-2-(dimethylsilyl)benzene and 1-bromo-3,4-dimethyl-6-(dimethylsilyl)benzene in 55–85% and 91% isolated yields (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis by Lithium–Halogen Exchange

The feasibility of aryne formation was tested in three representative reactions. In each of the original publications, only five to six silyl aryl triflates were investigated, presumably due to their inaccessibility. The first reaction selected was the direct arylation of anilines reported by Greaney in 2012.15 In the original paper, N-tritylanilines were reacted with an aryne precursor in the presence of CsF in toluene/acetonitrile 3:1 mixture at 110 °C for 48 h, followed by treatment with TFA to remove the trityl group. Nearly identical conditions allowed use of silyl aryl halides, underscoring the possibility of shortening the synthetic sequences (Table 2). The only difference in the reaction conditions was the use of dimethoxyethane/toluene instead of toluene/acetonitrile mixed solvent. 1-Bromo-3-methoxy-2-(dimethylsilyl)benzene reacts with 4-methoxy-N-tritylaniline to afford an excellent yield of the product (entry 1). Aryne precursors possessing electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl and fluoro substituents gave 82% and 61% isolated yields (entries 2 and 3). We are aware of only two reports that disclose use of trifluoromethyl-substituted silyl aryl triflates in aryne generation.16a,b Attempts to employ 2-(trifluoromethyl)-6-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl triflate in arylation of tritylated 4-methoxyaniline gave 14–16% yields under conditions reported by Greaney and under the conditions of Table 2.16c These examples show that in some cases silyl aryl bromides may afford better results compared to silyl aryl triflates. An aryne precursor with two methyl substituents worked well, giving the product in 62% isolated yield (entry 4). Silyl aryl iodides are also competent aryne sources (entry 5). Thus, reaction of 1-iodo-3-methoxy-2-(dimethylsilyl)benzene with tritylated 4-methoxyaniline gave arylation product in 96% isolated yield (entry 5).

Table 2.

Direct Arylation of Tritylanilinesa

graphic file with name nihms814656u3.jpg

entry substrate product yield, %
1 graphic file with name nihms814656t19.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t20.jpg 93
2 graphic file with name nihms814656t21.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t22.jpg 82
3 graphic file with name nihms814656t23.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t24.jpg 61
4 graphic file with name nihms814656t25.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t26.jpg 62
5 graphic file with name nihms814656t27.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t28.jpg 96
a

4-Methoxy-N-tritylaniline (0.2 mmol), silyl aryl bromide or iodide (0.36 mmol), CsF (0.75 mmol), solvent (2.5 mL), 110 °C, 48 h; then TFA (1.5 mL). Yields are isolated yields. See the Supporting Information for details. TFA = CF3CO2H; DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane.

The second reaction investigated is the intermolecular addition of amides to arynes reported by Larock in 2005.17 In the original communication, silyl aryl triflates were reacted with N-trifluoroacetylated anilines and CsF in acetonitrile solvent at ambient temperature. Some modifications of reaction conditions were required to obtain optimal results. Pivalonitrile solvent at elevated reaction temperature was used (Scheme 4). If acetonitrile solvent was employed, byproducts arising from protonation of 2-lithiobromoarenes were observed. 1-Bromo-3-methoxy-2-(dimethylsilyl)benzene reacts with trifluoro-N-(4-methylphenyl)acetamide in the presence of cesium fluoride to afford the product in 61% isolated yield. Similarly, 2-bromo-1,4-dimethoxy-3-(dimethylsilyl)benzene reacted with the trifluoroacetamide of 4-chloroaniline to give the C–N bond cleavage product in 56% yield.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Addition of Amides to Arynes

The third reaction selected was addition of ureas to arynes reported by Shirakawa and Hiyama in 2002.18 A reaction of silylaryl triflates with neat 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone (DMI) or N,N′-dimethylpropyleneurea (DMPU) in the presence of CsF at 20 °C gave good yields of benzodiazepine and benzodiazocine derivatives. After some optimization of reaction conditions, we discovered that tetramethylammonium fluoride (TMAF) at 0 °C in diethyl ether solvent afforded the best results (Table 3).

Table 3.

Addition of Arynes to DMPUa

graphic file with name nihms814656u4.jpg

entry substrate product yield, %
1 graphic file with name nihms814656t29.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t30.jpg 64
2 graphic file with name nihms814656t31.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t32.jpg 67
3 graphic file with name nihms814656t33.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t34.jpg 55
4 graphic file with name nihms814656t35.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t36.jpg 62
5 graphic file with name nihms814656t37.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t38.jpg 51
6 graphic file with name nihms814656t39.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t40.jpg 61
7 graphic file with name nihms814656t41.jpg graphic file with name nihms814656t42.jpg 67
a

Silyl aryl bromide or sulfamate (0.25 mmol), DMPU (0.75 mL), Me4NF (0.75 mmol), diethyl ether (0.5 mL), 0 °C, 6 h. Yields are isolated yields. See the Supporting Information for details. DMPU = 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone.

1-Bromo-3-methoxy-2-(dimethylsilyl)benzene reacts with DMPU in the presence of TMAF to give the product as a single regioisomer in 64% isolated yield (entry 1). Similarly, 5-bromo-1,2,3-trimethoxy-4-(dimethylsilyl)benzene affords 67% isolated yield of the product (entry 2). 1-Bromo-2-(dimethylsilyl)benzene gives substituted benzodiazocine in 55% yield (entry 3). Entry 4 shows that fluorine is compatible with the reaction conditions. A chloro substituent is tolerated as well (entry 5). The trifluoromethyl-substituted derivative is reactive, and the product is isolated in 61% yield (entry 6). The N,N-dimethyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl ester of sulfamic acid is a competent aryne source, and coupling with DMPU affords the product in 67% yield (entry 7). While a dimethylsulfamoyl group is a worse leaving group than triflate, it is a better directing group, and thus, direct deprotonative silylation of sulfamoic acid phenyl esters affords aryne precursors in one step as shown in Table 1, entry 9. Direct silylation of aryl triflates was not successful.

In conclusion, silyl aryl bromides and iodides can be conveniently prepared on large scale in one step from commercially available starting materials and can be used as aryne precursors under conditions similar to those employed for silyl aryl triflates. Use of silyl aryl halides was demonstrated in three transformations, ortho-arylation of N-tritylanilines, intermolecular addition of arynes to amides, and reaction of ureas with arynes.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgments

We thank the Welch Foundation (Chair No. E-0044) and NIGMS (Grant No. R01GM077635) for supporting this research.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01952.

Detailed experimental procedures and characterization data for new compounds (PDF)

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  • 1.(a) Tadross PM, Stoltz BM. Chem Rev. 2012;112:3550. doi: 10.1021/cr200478h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Goetz AE, Shah TK, Garg NK. Chem Commun. 2015;51:34. doi: 10.1039/c4cc06445c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Wu D, Ge H, Liu SH, Yin J. RSC Adv. 2013;3:22727. [Google Scholar]; (b) Pérez D, Peña D, Guitián E. Eur J Org Chem. 2013;2013:5981. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Truong T, Daugulis O. Chem Sci. 2013;4:531. doi: 10.1039/c2sc21288a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Stoermer R, Kahlert B. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1902;35:1633. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gilman H, Avakian S. J Am Chem Soc. 1945;67:349. doi: 10.1021/ja01214a506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Huisgen R, Sauer J, Hauser A. Chem Ber. 1958;91:2366. [Google Scholar]; (d) Meyers AI, Pansegrau PD. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1985:690. [Google Scholar]; (e) Hart H, Harada K, Du CJF. J Org Chem. 1985;50:3104. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Campbell CD, Rees CW. J Chem Soc C. 1969:742. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wittig G, Hoffmann RW. Chem Ber. 1962;95:2718. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stiles M, Miller RG, Burckhardt U. J Am Chem Soc. 1963;85:1792. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Niu D, Willoughby PH, Woods BP, Baire B, Hoye TR. Nature. 2013;501:531. doi: 10.1038/nature12492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Yun SY, Wang KP, Lee NK, Mamidipalli P, Lee D. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:4668. doi: 10.1021/ja400477r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Himeshima Y, Sonoda T, Kobayashi H. Chem Lett. 1983;8:1211. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kitamura T, Yamane M. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1995:983. [Google Scholar]; (c) Sarkar D, Melkonyan FS, Gulevich AV, Gevorgyan V. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:10800. doi: 10.1002/anie.201304884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Peña D, Cobas A, Pérez D, Guitián E. Synthesis. 2002:1454. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bronner SM, Garg NK. J Org Chem. 2009;74:8842. doi: 10.1021/jo9020166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Atkinson DJ, Sperry J, Brimble MA. Synthesis. 2010;2010:911. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Bordwell FG. Acc Chem Res. 1988;21:456. [Google Scholar]; (b) Trummal A, Lipping L, Kaljurand I, Koppel IA, Leito I. J Phys Chem A. 2016;120:3663. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b02253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chen LS, Chen GJ, Tamborski C. J Organomet Chem. 1980;193:283. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Cunico RF, Dexheimer EM. J Organomet Chem. 1973;59:153. [Google Scholar]; (b) Crossley JA, Kirkham JD, Browne DL, Harrity JPA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:6608. [Google Scholar]; (c) Effenberger F, Daub W. Chem Ber. 1991;124:2113. [Google Scholar]; (d) Rodríguez-Lojo D, Pérez D, Peña D, Guitián E. Chem Commun. 2013;49:6274. doi: 10.1039/c3cc43103g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Ikawa T, Urata H, Fukumoto Y, Sumii Y, Nishiyama T, Akai S. Chem - Eur J. 2014;20:16228. doi: 10.1002/chem.201404633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Krizan TD, Martin JC. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:6155. [Google Scholar]; (b) Taylor SL, Lee DY, Martin JC. J Org Chem. 1983;48:4156. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Widhalm M, Aichinger C, Mereiter K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:2425. [Google Scholar]; (b) Luliński S, Serwatowski J. J Org Chem. 2003;68:9384. doi: 10.1021/jo034790h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Leroux F, Schlosser M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:4272. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021115)41:22<4272::AID-ANIE4272>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Mattson RJ, Sloan CP, Lockhart CC, Catt JD, Gao Q, Huang S. J Org Chem. 1999;64:8004. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.(a) Medina JM, Mackey JL, Garg NK, Houk KN. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:15798. doi: 10.1021/ja5099935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gilmore CD, Allan KM, Stoltz BM. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:1558. doi: 10.1021/ja0780582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Yoshida H, Yoshida R, Takaki K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:8629. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Jayanth TT, Cheng CH. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:5921. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Tambar UK, Stoltz BM. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:5340. doi: 10.1021/ja050859m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pirali T, Zhang F, Miller AH, Head JL, McAusland D, Greaney MF. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:1006. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Sun L, Nie J, Zheng Y, Ma JA. J Fluorine Chem. 2015;174:88. [Google Scholar]; (b) García-López JA, Greaney MF. Org Lett. 2014;16:2338. doi: 10.1021/ol5006246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) See the Supporting Information for details.
  • 17.Liu Z, Larock RC. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:13112. doi: 10.1021/ja054079p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yoshida H, Shirakawa E, Honda Y, Hiyama T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:3247. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17<3247::AID-ANIE3247>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES