ABSTRACT
Recombineering, in vivo genetic engineering with bacteriophage homologous recombination systems, is a powerful technique for making genetic modifications in bacteria. Two systems widely used in Escherichia coli are the Red system from phage λ and RecET from the defective Rac prophage. We investigated the in vivo dependence of recombineering on DNA replication of the recombining substrate using plasmid targets. For λ Red recombination, when DNA replication of a circular target plasmid is prevented, recombination with single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides is greatly reduced compared to that under replicating conditions. For RecET recombination, when DNA replication of the targeted plasmid is prevented, the recombination frequency is also reduced, to a level identical to that seen for the Red system in the absence of replication. The very low level of oligonucleotide recombination observed in the absence of any phage recombination functions is the same in the presence or absence of DNA replication. In contrast, both the Red and RecET systems recombine a nonreplicating linear dimer plasmid with high efficiency to yield a circular monomer. Therefore, the DNA replication requirement is substrate dependent. Our data are consistent with recombination by both the Red and RecET systems occurring predominately by single-strand annealing rather than by strand invasion.
IMPORTANCE
Bacteriophage homologous recombination systems are widely used for in vivo genetic engineering in bacteria. Single- or double-stranded linear DNA substrates containing short flanking homologies to chromosome targets are used to generate precise and accurate genetic modifications when introduced into bacteria expressing phage recombinases. Understanding the molecular mechanism of these recombination systems will facilitate improvements in the technology. Here, two phage-specific systems are shown to require exposure of complementary single-strand homologous targets for efficient recombination; these single-strand regions may be created during DNA replication or by single-strand exonuclease digestion of linear duplex DNA. Previously, in vitro studies reported that these recombinases promote the single-strand annealing of two complementary DNAs and also strand invasion of a single DNA strand into duplex DNA to create a three-stranded region. Here, in vivo experiments show that recombinase-mediated annealing of complementary single-stranded DNA is the predominant recombination pathway in E. coli.
INTRODUCTION
The bacteriophage λ Red and the bacterial Rac prophage RecET generalized recombination systems are used for efficient insertion of short linear DNAs, a process known by its colloquial name, recombineering (1–5). Each system has a highly processive 5′-to-3′ double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) exonuclease, λ Exo (6, 7) or Rac RecE (8–10), respectively, and single-strand annealing proteins (recombinase), λ Beta (11, 12) or Rac RecT (13, 14), respectively. In vitro, both recombinases have been reported to promote single-strand annealing, as well as strand invasion, the latter only at very AT-rich sequences (Fig. 1A and B) (15, 16).
When used for recombineering, Beta, RecT, and other phage recombinases give robust levels of recombination with short single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligonucleotides (3, 17). Additionally, a basal level of this type of homologous ssDNA recombination occurs in Escherichia coli and other bacterial species in the absence of any known host or phage recombination system (18–20). For dsDNA recombination, the exonuclease and recombinase pairs act in concert to process and recombine linear dsDNA; in this reaction, exonuclease digestion results in 3′ single-strand overhangs that are recombined by the recombinases (1, 2). Linear dsDNA recombination is enhanced by the λ Gam protein, which inhibits the E. coli RecBCD exonuclease (17, 21, 22).
Classical experiments with phage λ infections (23–25) found that Red and RecET behaved similarly when promoting phage λ recombination, with both showing a dependence on DNA replication, and it was suggested that phage recombination events may occur best at replication forks or on newly replicated DNA (25). When λ DNA replication was prevented, Red recombination was limited and occurred only near double-strand breaks in the phage DNA (26). This recombination was subsequently shown to occur predominately by single-strand annealing (27). In vivo, RecET functions can promote intramolecular circularization of nonreplicating linear DNA molecules containing homologous repeats to generate recombinant plasmids (28–31).
Reports from several labs have suggested that DNA replication of the target molecule is important for recombineering. The first hint came from the observation that Red-mediated ssDNA recombination displays a strand preference, in that one of two complementary strands yields a higher recombinant frequency than the other (3, 32). This strand bias is not dependent upon transcription but is dependent upon the direction of DNA replication through the target, such that the oligonucleotide conferring the higher recombination frequency corresponds in sequence to the discontinuously replicated lagging strand. A lagging/leading bias was also observed with RecT (17), as well as with other, similar, recombinase functions. Efficient recombineering with the Red system requires functions involved in DNA replication (33–36). If an intact plasmid target cannot replicate, the level of Red-mediated ssDNA and dsDNA recombination is reduced (33, 36, 37).
We have further investigated the involvement of DNA replication of the target plasmid for oligonucleotide recombination, both that mediated by the λ Red or Rac RecET recombinase and that which occurs in the absence of any known recombinase. First, we assayed single-strand oligonucleotide recombination targeting pUC plasmids that were either freely replicating or blocked for DNA replication. Second, we examined Red- and RecET-dependent circularization of a nonreplicating linear plasmid containing a direct repeat. Our experimental results are consistent with the Red Beta and Rac RecT recombinases acting predominately by single-strand annealing rather than by strand invasion, whether they are targeting circular plasmids or linear substrates.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Oligonucleotide-plasmid recombination.
For supercoiled plasmids, the phage recombinase, i.e., Red Beta or Rac RecT, must initiate recombination with ssDNA on the circular substrate (Fig. 1). If these proteins act solely by single-strand annealing, they will require ssDNA targets on the plasmid for this initiation. Such targets arise as the replication fork passes, generating a long ssDNA region on the lagging-strand template and a much shorter ssDNA region ahead of the continuously replicated leading strand (3). In the absence of plasmid replication, these targets are absent. In contrast, initiation of recombination by strand invasion does not require a single-stranded target and should be independent of DNA replication. If strand invasion occurs, duplex DNA is opened; the oligonucleotide is annealed by the recombinase to the complementary target, and the displaced DNA is extruded in a D-loop. The D-loop can be further processed to form complete recombinants. Events initiated by strand invasion should happen at the same frequency whether or not DNA replication occurs and with equal probability on either strand.
Experimental design.
To address these models, we compared ssDNA oligonucleotide recombination frequencies targeting either freely replicating or nonreplicating plasmids. We used bacterial hosts expressing either Red Beta or Rac RecT or lacking these recombinases. We used a polA resA1 mutation (38) to block origin-dependent plasmid replication (39). This mutation does not prevent replication of the E. coli chromosome or prevent Red-mediated recombination for oligonucleotide correction of a point mutation on the E. coli chromosome (34). The strains are RecA+; however, the oligonucleotide recombination that occurs in these strains is independent of RecA (3, 18, 19, 40). Detecting recombinants in replication-blocked experiments requires isolation of plasmid DNA after the cells are washed to remove any extracellular nucleic acids. Isolated plasmid DNA is then introduced into replication-competent cells lacking any recombination function, where previously initiated recombinants can be scored. When plasmid replication is allowed, in the PolA+ host, recombination frequencies can be scored either by plating cells directly on selective medium or by the same DNA isolation and transformation procedure used for the polA resA1 mutant strains.
Plasmid substrates for ssDNA oligonucleotide recombination.
We used two plasmid substrates with useful properties for our experiments. Plasmid pLT60 is a pUC derivative carrying bla conferring Ampr and the kan gene carrying an amber mutation at tyrosine codon 39 [kan(Am)] (41). Plasmid pLT62 is identical to pLT60, except that it contains a four-base replacement (CGAG) of a three-base sequence (AGC) in kan at the 39th codon, resulting in a frameshift and introducing a unique XhoI restriction site. These multiple mispairs are refractory to mismatch repair (MMR) (32, 40), and equivalent numbers of recombinants are obtained whether recombination is executed in strains with or without MMR functions. In our assays, the plasmid mutations are repaired to kan+ conferring kanamycin resistance (Kanr). A set of two complementary ssDNA oligonucleotides, LT217 and LT213 (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), were used to repair the mutations. LT217 is a lagging-strand oligonucleotide where the lagging strand is the same as the discontinuously replicated strand. LT213 is a leading-strand oligonucleotide where the leading strand is the same as the continuously replicated strand. In all cases, plasmid DNA and oligonucleotides were introduced by coelectroporation (see Materials and Methods for details).
Repairing a point mutation on a plasmid in PolA+ cells.
Recombination frequencies for freely replicating plasmid pLT60 by oligonucleotide crosses were determined by plating cells on selective media in hosts expressing the Red Beta or Rac RecT recombinase or neither phage recombinase (Fig. 2A; see Table S2 in the supplemental material), scoring the frequency of Kanr among total Ampr plasmid transformants. For the recombinase-expressing strains, the recombination frequencies we observed here with plasmid pLT60 are consistent with our previous results obtained with lagging and leading oligonucleotides to target galK on the E. coli chromosome (3, 17, 32, 40). For Red Beta, >30% of the total colonies contained lagging-strand recombinant plasmids, about 10-fold more than we observed for RecT. Without any recombinase, the level of lagging-strand recombinants was >10,000-fold lower than that obtained with Red. For the recombinases, the observed lag/lead bias was similar to that observed for recombineering when targeting the bacterial chromosome (19). No significant lag/lead bias was seen when the recombinase-independent strain was used.
Isolation and reintroduction of plasmid DNA from replicating crosses.
A plasmid DNA isolation procedure is necessary in order to score oligonucleotide recombination that initiated in the absence of plasmid replication in the polA mutant hosts. We also isolated freely replicating plasmid DNA from the PolA+ hosts and introduced that DNA into a second bacterium lacking recombination functions at less than one molecule per cell. We found a lower apparent recombination frequency when the plasmids were assayed in the second host than with direct plating as described above. This is because many cells from which plasmids were isolated contained no recombinants, only parental plasmids. Even cells with recombinants contained a mixture of parental and recombinant species, with recombinants in the minority, as measured previously (41). The apparent reductions in recombination frequencies with this procedure were ~3-fold for Red Beta, ~10-fold for RecT, and 2- to 3-fold when the cells lacked a phage recombinase (compare Fig. 2A and B; see Table S2 in the supplemental material). We will compare data from these experiments in which replication was allowed to those from the experiments in which polA replication was blocked.
Repairing a point mutation on a plasmid in polA resA1 mutant cells.
For both phage recombinases, when plasmid DNA replication was allowed, the lagging-strand oligonucleotide, LT217, gave at least 10-fold more recombinants than the leading-strand oligonucleotide, LT213. In contrast, the basal recombinase-independent level of plasmid recombination displayed no significant strand bias. When DNA replication is prevented for Beta, RecT, or the recombinase-independent systems, the lagging-versus-leading-strand bias is abolished, with the two complementary oligonucleotides giving nearly identical frequencies (Fig. 2C; see Table S3 in the supplemental material). In the absence of plasmid DNA replication, expression of Beta or RecT increased recombination only marginally above that observed in the absence of the recombinases, with that level converging to ~1 × 104/108 total plasmid transformants (Fig. 2C; see Table S3). Thus, frequencies of Beta and RecT recombination were both reduced by blocking replication but Beta recombination was more strongly impacted (compare Fig. 2B and C). For Beta, the reduction was more than 800-fold for the lagging-strand oligonucleotide. In contrast, for RecT, the efficiency of lagging-strand oligonucleotide recombination was reduced <20-fold and leading-strand recombination had little or no dependence on replication. The recombination that occurred in the absence of the phage recombinases was ~5-fold higher when plasmid replication was blocked (compare Fig. 2B and C). If recombinase-independent formation of recombinant plasmids is a slow process, molecules that are undergoing recombination could be diluted out by freely replicating plasmids.
Multiple adjacent mismatches reduce recombination levels.
It was previously demonstrated (34, 40) that multiple mispaired bases in the oligonucleotides are repaired by the Red system, but with reduced recombination efficiency. Experiments similar to those described for pLT60 were done with plasmid pLT62 (Fig. 3A to C; see Tables S4 and S5 in the supplemental material), which contains four contiguous base changes, with a frameshift at the site of the amber mutation in pLT60. The oligonucleotides, when annealed to pLT62, form a larger mismatch, with four bases on the plasmid and three on the oligonucleotide remaining unpaired. When assayed directly, the replication-allowed recombinase-mediated recombination frequencies obtained with pLT62 are lower (~4-fold) than those found with pLT60, consistent with previous experiments (34, 40) (compare Fig. 2A and 3A). In the absence of any phage recombinase, a greater reduction (~15-fold) in the repair of multiple mismatches versus a single base mismatch was observed. Thus, basal recombination with a substrate containing multiple mismatches is lower than that that of a substrate with a point mutation, indicating that however the basal level of recombination occurs, the process is inhibited more by several contiguous mispairs than are the recombinase-mediated reactions. This observation is in keeping with the known in vitro properties of Beta, which can drive strand exchange through several mismatches (42).
When the point mutation on pLT60 was repaired in the absence of DNA replication (Fig. 2C), the efficiency of recombination observed in the absence of Beta and RecT was only slightly lower than when they were expressed, arguing against the idea that these functions stimulate recombination on a nonreplicating template. The background level of recombination obscures most of the activity the recombinases might have under these conditions. In contrast, when replication of pLT62 was prevented, only a very few Kanr recombinants were recovered from recombinase-independent experiments (Fig. 3C). Our results show that although oligonucleotides containing multiple adjacent mispairs are more difficult to anneal to the complementary target, both Beta and RecT can promote this recombination on a nonreplicating substrate. A 10-fold increase in targeting oligonucleotide allowed isolation of Kanr pLT62 recombinants from the recombinase-deficient polA mutant host, with frequencies similar to those seen for the recombinase-independent pLT60 replication-blocked crosses (compare Fig. 2C to 3C). In the absence of a phage recombinase, flooding the cell with excess targeting oligonucleotide improves a poor reaction that may be dependent on mass action. The stimulation observed when the concentration of the targeting oligonucleotide is increased is in contrast to our observations with Beta-dependent recombination targeting pLT62, where adding 10-fold more targeting oligonucleotide did not increase the recombination frequency in the absence of plasmid replication (see Table S5 in the supplemental material).
Both Beta and RecT were initially identified as single-strand annealing proteins lacking the strand invasion activity possessed by RecA protein (12, 13). Later, they were reported to have limited strand invasion activity, but only on AT-rich substrates (15, 43). Since the GC content in the region of our oligonucleotide targets on the plasmid is ~50%, strand invasion by either recombinase is unlikely in our in vivo system. When the two recombinases mediate oligonucleotide recombination targeting either of the nonreplicating plasmids, their frequencies converge to the same value. It is theoretically possible that both recombinases promote the same low level of strand invasion on these substrates. However, we think that a more likely interpretation of our data is that a fraction of the intracellular plasmid population has lesions in the DNA. This plasmid DNA was isolated with a commercial kit. Thus, some fraction of the DNA is not supercoiled and likely contains nicks or gaps and may be partially replicated. Lesions that reveal the single-stranded complementary target would allow single-strand oligonucleotides to anneal and initiate recombination, in the presence or absence of recombinases. Once initiation has occurred, the strand exchange properties of the recombinases (42, 44) could promote more efficient incorporation of the oligonucleotide on the nonreplicating plasmid. If this interpretation is correct, we predict that ~10−4 of our plasmid DNAs contains ssDNA at the target site. This frequency reflects the number of recombinants (104 Kanr) per 108 Ampr transformants.
Detection of plasmid recombination intermediates formed in the absence of DNA replication.
Initiation of oligonucleotide recombination in the absence of plasmid DNA replication is expected to form heteroduplex plasmid molecules, with the ssDNA oligonucleotide annealed to the target sequence. These intermediates can be further processed into completed recombinants; one route to their completion is by DNA replication in the second host. We looked for heteroduplex recombination intermediates that formed in the polA resA1 mutant Beta- and RecT-expressing strains as follows. Plasmid pLT60 DNA preparations, isolated from replication-blocked recombination experiments, were introduced into recA mutant strains that were either proficient or deficient in methyl-directed MMR. When oligonucleotide LT217 anneals to its complementary target on pLT60, a C-C mispair is formed; C-C mismatches are not corrected by the MMR system (32, 40, 45), so the apparent recombinant efficiency should be the same whether recombinants are scored in a Mut+ or a mutS mutant host. This is what we observed (Fig. 4A). In contrast, when oligonucleotide LT213 pairs to its complementary target sequence on pLT60, a G-G mismatch is formed. Since G-G mispairs are well repaired by MMR (32, 45), MMR will occur in the Mut+ host to remove G-G heteroduplexes, resulting in a reduction of Kan+ colonies relative to those where the mutS mutant strain was transformed. For Red Beta, the “apparent” recombination efficiency of oligonucleotide LT213 targeting pLT60 was ~12-fold lower in the Mut+ host than that found in the mutS mutant host (Fig. 4B; see Table S3 in the supplemental material). This differential efficiency of Beta-mediated LT213 recombinants is indicative of heteroduplex plasmid recombination intermediates that form in the absence of DNA replication and that can be subsequently repaired in the Mut+ host when the plasmid is replicated. Methyl-directed MMR of the newly replicated, unmethylated DNA strand is coupled to DNA replication (46). For RecT, we found that the apparent recombination efficiency of oligonucleotide LT213 was ~6-fold lower in a Mut+ host than in a mutS mutant host (see Table S3).
We used the same procedure to look for Beta-mediated recombination intermediates that form on replicating plasmids when the recombinase anneals the oligonucleotide to single-strand regions present at the DNA replication fork. Here, after coelectroporating pLT60 with either oligonucleotide, the amount of outgrowth was limited to only 1 h before DNA isolation, in order to preserve at least some of the recombination intermediates. Under limited plasmid replication conditions, we were also able to detect heteroduplex intermediates. For oligonucleotide LT217, which generates an unrepaired C-C mismatch when annealed to its target on the plasmid, the frequency of Kanr colonies among total Ampr transformants was identical when scored in either the Mut+ or the mutS mutant host. The recombinant frequency was 10-fold higher than that found in the absence of plasmid replication (Fig. 4A); some stimulation in frequency by DNA replication is expected. For oligonucleotide LT213, which forms a well-repaired G-G mismatch when paired to its target, the number of Kanr recombinant colonies scored in a Mut+ host was reduced ~10-fold relative to that observed in a mutS mutant host (Fig. 4B). Hence, our data show that the DNA isolation and transformation procedure we used preserves heteroduplex plasmid intermediates that have not yet replicated.
A similar analysis was performed for the recombinase-independent polA mutant strain LT1715. Figure 4C shows that plasmid DNA recovered from experiments with LT1715 targeting plasmid pLT60 with either of the two oligonucleotides transforms the Mut+ and mutS mutant DH10B hosts with equal efficiency. Here, we did not detect G-G mispair heteroduplex molecules from plasmid pLT60 by oligonucleotide LT213 crosses. The data show that these recombinants, which do not depend on DNA replication, are not subject to MMR. The mechanism of their formation remains to be determined. Since LT1715 is RecA+, this result provides additional evidence that RecA is not responsible for heteroduplex molecules present in the plasmid DNA recovered from the Beta- and RecT-mediated experiments described above.
Recombination of a linear dsDNA to form a circular molecule.
In the previous experiments with a circular plasmid, DNA replication provided an ssDNA target to which the Beta and RecT recombinases could anneal a single-stranded oligonucleotide. We also tested a linear dsDNA plasmid substrate on which the recombinases work in concert with their exonuclease partners to promote intramolecular recombination (Fig. 5), forming circular plasmids. We expect that this recombination will proceed by single-strand annealing, as it requires both the exonuclease activity to degrade the 5′ chains of the dsDNA substrate and the single-strand recombinase activity to anneal the resulting 3′ ssDNA complementary segments (Fig. 5). Initiation of pBR322 plasmid replication requires a supercoiled substrate (47–49), and DNA replication cannot occur until recombination-dependent circularization occurs. Hence, this linear plasmid DNA is another type of nonreplicating substrate.
Plasmid substrate for linear DNA recombination.
The linear substrate is a directly repeated dimer of pBR322 (28) and thus has nearly 4.4 kb of tandem direct repeat homology. The linear dimer has two wild-type copies of the ampicillin resistance gene bla and a different mutation in each of the two copies of the tetracycline resistance gene tet; each of these unique mutations introduces an XhoI restriction site (Fig. 5). Symington et al. (28) showed that the RecET system efficiently recombines this type of substrate to form circular monomers and that the configuration of tet mutations in the final products can be determined by restriction analysis.
Red and RecET recombine a linear dimer with high efficiency.
The Red system was expressed in recA mutant host HME71 or SIMD101, and the RecET system was expressed in SIMD95 or SIMD99. A dimer plasmid DNA, either linear or circular, was introduced by electroporation, and the percentage of viable cells with Ampr plasmids was determined in the presence or absence of recombinase expression (Table 1). Control experiments showed that the number of transformants from the linear DNA preparation was extremely low when the phage recombination systems were not expressed (Table 1). These rare Ampr transformants carried unrecombined dimer plasmids still containing the BamHI site, suggesting that they had escaped BamHI digestion and were never linearized. When either recombination system was induced at 42ºC, circular Ampr plasmids, predominately monomers, were recovered with greatly enhanced frequencies. Under these recombination-proficient conditions, the linear plasmid transformation efficiency approached that of the supercoiled dimer plasmid control, indicating a high frequency of recombination (Table 1).
TABLE 1 .
Temp (ºC), condition, and DNA type | Transformation efficiencya |
|
---|---|---|
Red | RecET | |
32, uninduced | ||
Supercoiled | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Linear | 0.021 | 0.013 |
42, induced | ||
Supercoiled | 1.6 | 2.9 |
Linear | 0.70 | 1.04 |
Transformation efficiency is expressed as the percentage of viable cells that were Ampr transformants. The values obtained with the supercoiled dimer control plasmid are presented for comparison with those obtained with the linear dimer plasmid. The number of replicates in each experiment ranged between four and seven, with an average standard deviation of 49%.
Dimer recombination products differ for Red and RecET.
Plasmid DNA from the linear dimer experiments was isolated and digested with XhoI and PstI to determine the pattern of marker inheritance (Table 2; Fig. 5) (see Materials and Methods). Analysis of the linear dimer recombination products shows that the pattern of marker inheritance differs for the two systems (Table 3). Interpreting the results as products of single-strand annealing, the Red system usually (~88% of the time) degraded the linear substrate asymmetrically, from one end or the other, and those molecules that experienced substantial degradation from both ends to generate the tet-14 recombinant occurred at a much lower frequency (10.7%). In contrast, nearly a third (31.1%) of the plasmid molecules isolated from the RecET experiment contained the tet-14 recombinant generated by symmetric resection, as if digestion of both DNA ends is more concerted. Butland et al. (50) identified protein-protein interactions between RecE and DNA ligase. If DNA ligase is also part of the RecET recombination complex, it may promote the completion of recombination intermediates by sealing nicks.
TABLE 2 .
Active recombination system | No. of plasmids/total (%) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monomersa | Symmetric resection (tet-14)a | Resection from left (tet-10 tet-14) | Resection from right (Tet+) | Other (tet-10) | |
Red | 55/60 (91.7) | 6/55 (10.9) | 24/55 (43.6) | 25/55 (45.5) | 0/55 |
RecET | 61/84 (72.6) | 19/61 (31.1) | 26/61 (42.6) | 15/61 (24.6) | 1/61 (1.6) |
The number of higher-order forms is significantly higher for RecET (P = 0.0051 [Fisher exact test]). The tet-14 class is significantly higher for RecET (P = 0.012 [Fisher exact test]).
TABLE 3 .
Strain | Genotype | Source or reference |
---|---|---|
DH5α | F− φ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 deoR recA1 endA1 hsdR17(rK− mK+) phoA supE44 λ− thi-1 gyrA96 relA1 | Invitrogen |
DH10B | F− mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) φ80lacZΔM15 ΔlacX74 recA1 endA1 araD139 Δ(ara leu)7697 galU galK rpsL nupG λ− tonA | Invitrogen |
HME6 | W3110 Δ(argF-lac)U169 galKtyr145UAG [λcI857 Δ(cro-bioA)] | 3 |
HME68 | W3110 Δ(argF-lac)U169 galKtyr145UAG mutS<>cat [λcI857 Δ(cro-bioA)] | 41 |
HME69 | W3110 Δ(argF-lac)U169 galKtyr145UAG mutS<>cat [λcI857 Δ(cro-bioA)] polA resA1::Tn10 | 34 |
HME71 | HME6 Δ(srlA-recA)::Tn10 | 41 |
LT1712 | SIMD89 polA resA1::Tn10 | This study |
LT1714 | W3110 mutS<>cat | This study |
LT1715 | W3110 mutS<>cat polA resA1::Tn10 | This study |
LT1533 | DH10B mutS<>cat | This study |
SIMD89 | HME6 [λ(int-cIII) recT] mutS<>cat | 17 |
SIMD95 | HME6 [λ(int-cIII) gam recEa recT] Δ(srlA-recA)::Tn10 | This study |
SIMD99 | HME6 [λ(int-cIII) gam recEa recT] recA<>speC | This study |
SIMD101 | HME6 recA<>speC | This study |
The recE gene is full length, encoding a protein of 866 amino acids.
Both the Red and RecET systems have highly processive exonucleases (14, 51) capable of degrading an entire strand of the linear dimer plasmid without dissociation. There is evidence suggesting (37, 52) that the Red system, when provided with a dsDNA molecule, degrades one of the two strands entirely, and the remaining single strand is the active recombination substrate. If an entire DNA strand of the linear dsDNA dimer substrate is degraded, circularization could no longer occur via annealing of the complementary strands, as no complementarity would exist. However, our linear dimer data demonstrate that the λ Red system does not always process dsDNAs to ssDNA intermediates; instead, our results are consistent with the more classical model (53) of partial Exo-mediated digestion of each 5′ strand of the linear dsDNA molecules, followed by Beta-mediated single-strand annealing of complementary regions within the single-stranded overhangs. This pathway is extremely efficient for either Red or RecET, with ~50% and ~30% of the linear DNA molecules becoming recombinant, respectively.
The linear dimer plasmid substrate is a nonreplicating substrate, yet both the Red and RecET systems recombine it to form circular monomers proficiently. Taken together with the results of our other experiments using an oligonucleotide to target a nonreplicating circular plasmid, these results demonstrate that the DNA replication requirement proposed for Red-mediated recombineering (33, 36, 37) depends on the DNA substrate and applies only to circular DNA molecules. Our experiments are consistent with both the Red and RecET systems acting predominately by single-strand annealing. The RecT-mediated oligonucleotide recombination frequency on freely replicating plasmids is less robust than that mediated by Beta, suggesting that RecT recombination occurs less often at single-stranded gaps present at the DNA replication fork then does Red recombination. To explain this difference, we suggest that the Beta protein may be better able to displace the single-strand binding (SSB) protein from a DNA replication fork. While we cannot rigorously rule out a low level of strand invasion in our circular-plasmid–oligonucleotide crosses, any strand invasion must be barely above the level of the background recombination occurring in the absence of recombinases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides.
The E. coli strains used in the experiments described here are listed in Table 3. DH5α (Invitrogen) was used as a recA mutant host for preparation of high-quality plasmid DNA. Oligonucleotides used for strain construction (see Text S1 in the supplemental material) and recombination studies were procured from Integrated DNA Technologies and supplied as salt free but otherwise unpurified; for their sequences, see Table S1 in the supplemental material. Agarose gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNAs was done in Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer, routinely with 0.7 to 0.8% agarose.
Recombineering methodology targeting circular plasmids.
Recombineering was done according to established procedures, with strains defective for methyl-directed MMR, except as noted below (54–56). For plasmid-oligonucleotide crosses, 20 ng of monomer plasmid DNA was coelectroporated with 5 pmol of oligonucleotide. This amount of plasmid gives a high but not saturating transformation efficiency (41). In order to generate a sufficient amount of plasmid DNA for analysis, five independent electroporations of identical 1-ml reaction mixtures were pooled. These pooled reaction mixtures were diluted 10-fold into L broth (LB) and grown in a 32°C shaking H2O bath for 3.5 h. When DNA replication was allowed, cultures were diluted and plated directly on L agar plates to determine viable cell counts, L agar plates containing ampicillin at 100 μg/ml (LB-Amp100) to determine plasmid transformation efficiency, and L agar plates containing kanamycin at 30 μg/ml to determine the recombinant frequency. When polA mutant hosts are used to monitor replication-independent events, direct plating of the cultures cannot be used to monitor plasmid recombination occurring in the absence of replication. In order to score recombinants from the replication-blocked crosses, after allowing time for recombination, bacterial cells were washed four times in LB to remove extracellular DNA, twice in a 30-ml volume and twice in 1 ml, followed by an additional 1-ml water wash, and then frozen at −20°C prior to DNA isolation. Plasmid DNA was isolated with a miniprep kit (Qiagen) and suspended in 30 µl of distilled H2O (dH2O). DNA (1 to 5 µl) was introduced by electrotransformation into either commercial electrocompetent DH10B Mega-X cells (Invitrogen) or LT1533 (DH10B mutS<>cat) cells, and the cells were allowed to recover for 2 h in 1 ml of LB in a 30°C roller and then diluted and plated appropriately. Recombination frequencies were normalized to the number of Kanr colonies per 108 Ampr transformants.
On average, about 5- to 10-fold less plasmid DNA was recovered from polA mutant hosts than from PolA+ hosts; this was compensated for by introducing a larger volume of plasmid DNA from the mutant host into DH10B. In either case, about 5 ng of plasmid DNA was typically electroporated into DH10B, resulting in an Ampr plasmid transformation efficiency of about 0.5% of the viable cells. Control experiments (described in Text S1 in the supplemental material) were done to determine whether the extracellular plasmid and oligonucleotide could survive the washing procedure and contribute to recombinant formation in the second host, DH10B. In no case did we recover Kanr plasmids, demonstrating that the washing procedure adequately removed excess nucleic acids.
Plasmid substrate for dsDNA linear dimer recombination.
Plasmid pRDK41 (57) was obtained from the Coli Genetic Stock Center: http://cgsc.biology.yale.edu. This pBR322-derived plasmid dimer contains two intact bla genes and two tet genes, each with a mutation, one modifying the N terminus, tet-10, and the other modifying the C terminus, tet-14. Each mutation introduces an XhoI site (28). The BamHI site near the tet-14 allele was mutated with oligonucleotide LT807 for recombineering. This allowed the dimer plasmid to be digested at the remaining unique BamHI site to create the linear dimer recombination substrate.
Linear plasmid recombination methodology.
The linear dimer DNA was suspended at 10 ng/µl, and 1 µl was introduced by electroporation into recA mutant cells expressing the phage recombination systems. Control experiments (Table 2) show that with 10 ng of supercoiled dimer plasmid DNA, 1 to 5% of the total viable cells were transformed. After a 2-h recovery period in 1 ml of LB at 30°C with aeration, cultures were diluted appropriately and plated on LB to determine the total number of viable cells and on LB-Amp100 to score plasmid transformants. Control experiments without induction of the recombination systems or with Beta and RecT expressed in the absence of their partner exonucleases confirmed that expression of both the recombinase and exonuclease was required for recombination activity on this substrate. For each experiment, 12 Ampr colonies were purified and 5-ml cultures were grown in LB-Amp100. Plasmid DNA was isolated from these saturated cultures with a Qiagen miniprep kit; DNA was suspended in 50 µl of dH2O. Uncut plasmids were analyzed on 0.8% TAE agarose gels to determine the multimeric state of the plasmids. To determine the genetic markers present on each plasmid, ~0.5 µg of plasmid DNA was digested in a double digest with PstI and XhoI (New England Biolabs, Inc.) and the digests were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The restriction digests gave unique band patterns for each plasmid type. The starting dimer plasmid yields four bands of 3.6 kb, 2.35 kb, 2.0 kb, and 778 bp. The monomer recombinant plasmid products were one of four classes: the wild-type tet allele, a single band of 4.36 kb; the tet-10 allele, two bands of 3.59 kb and 778 bp; the tet-14 allele, two bands of 2.35 kb and 2.0 kb; and the tet-10 tet-14 allele, three bands of 2.35 kb, 1.25 kb, and 778 bp.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank members of the Court laboratory and the reviewers for helpful suggestions. We also thank M. Spencer, N. Shrader, T. Hartley, and K. Pike from the CRTP Genomics Laboratory of the Frederick National Lab for Sanger sequencing.
This work was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research. This project was also partly funded with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract HHSN261200800001E.
We have no conflict of interest to declare.
Footnotes
Citation Thomason LC, Costantino N, Court DL. 2016. Examining a DNA replication requirement for bacteriophage λ Red- and Rac prophage RecET-promoted recombination in Escherichia coli. mBio 7(5):e01443-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.01443-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Murphy KC. 1998. Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180:2063–2071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu D, Ellis HM, Lee E-C, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Court DL. 2000. An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:5978–5983. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100127597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ellis HM, Yu D, DiTizio T, Court DL. 2001. High efficiency mutagenesis, repair, and engineering of chromosomal DNA using single-stranded oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:6742–6746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121164898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Muyrers JP, Zhang Y, Stewart AF. 2001. Techniques: recombinogenic engineering—new options for cloning and manipulating DNA. Trends Biochem Sci 26:325–331. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01757-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Muyrers JPP, Zhang Y, Benes V, Testa G, Rientjes JM, Stewart AF. 2004. ET recombination: DNA engineering using homologous recombination in E. coli. Methods Mol Biol 256:107–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Little JW. 1967. An exonuclease induced by bacteriophage lambda. II. Nature of the enzymatic reaction. J Biol Chem 242:679–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carter DM, Radding CM. 1971. The role of exonuclease and beta protein of phage lambda in genetic recombination. II. Substrate specificity and the mode of action of lambda exonuclease. J Biol Chem 246:2502–2512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kushner SR, Nagaishi H, Clark AJ. 1974. Isolation of exonuclease VIII: the enzyme associated with the sbcA indirect suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71:3593–3597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.9.3593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Joseph JW, Kolodner R. 1983. Exonuclease VIII of Escherichia coli. I. Purification and physical properties. J Biol Chem 258:10411–10417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Joseph JW, Kolodner R. 1983. Exonuclease VIII of Escherichia coli. II. Mechanism of action. J Biol Chem 258:10418–10424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kmiec E, Holloman WK. 1981. Beta protein of bacteriophage lambda promotes renaturation of DNA. J Biol Chem 256:12636–12639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Muniyappa K, Radding CM. 1986. The homologous recombination system of phage lambda. Pairing activities of β protein. J Biol Chem 261:7472–7478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hall SD, Kane MF, Kolodner RD. 1993. Identification and characterization of the Escherichia coli RecT protein, a protein encoded by the recE region that promotes renaturation of homologous single-stranded DNA. J Bacteriol 175:277–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kolodner R, Hall SD, Luisi-DeLuca C. 1994. Homologous pairing proteins encoded by the Escherichia coli recE and recT genes. Mol Microbiol 11:23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00286.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rybalchenko N, Golub EI, Bi B, Radding CM. 2004. Strand invasion promoted by recombination protein beta of phage lambda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:17056–17060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408046101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Noirot P, Kolodner RD. 1998. DNA strand invasion promoted by Escherichia coli RecT protein. J Biol Chem 273:12274–12280. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.20.12274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Datta S, Costantino N, Zhou X, Court DL. 2008. Identification and analysis of recombineering functions from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and their phages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:1626–1631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709089105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dutra BE, Sutera VA, Lovett ST. 2007. RecA-independent recombination is efficient but limited by exonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:216–221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608293104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Swingle B, Markel E, Costantino N, Bubunenko MG, Cartinhour S, Court DL. 2010. Oligonucleotide recombination in Gram-negative bacteria. Mol Microbiol 75:138–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06976.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Swingle B, Markel E, Cartinhour S. 2010. Oligonucleotide recombination: a hidden treasure. Bioeng Bugs 1:263–266. doi: 10.4161/bbug.1.4.12098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sakaki Y, Karu AE, Linn S, Echols H. 1973. Purification and properties of the gamma-protein specified by bacteriophage lambda: an inhibitor of the host RecBC recombination enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70:2215–2219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murphy KC. 1991. Lambda Gam protein inhibits the helicase and chi-stimulated recombination activities of Escherichia coli RecBCD enzyme. J Bacteriol 173:5808–5821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gillen JR, Willis DK, Clark AJ. 1981. Genetic analysis of the RecE pathway of genetic recombination in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 145:521–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gillen J, Cark AJ. 1974. The RecE pathway of bacterial recombination, p 123–136. In Grell RF (ed), Mechanisms in recombination. Plenum Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stahl FW, McMilin KD, Stahl MM, Nozu Y. 1972. An enhancing role for DNA synthesis in formation of bacteriophage lambda recombinants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 69:3598–3601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.12.3598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thaler DS, Stahl MM, Stahl FW. 1987. Double-chain-cut sites are recombination hot spots in the red pathway of phage lambda. J Mol Biol 195:75–87. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90328-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stahl MM, Thomason L, Poteete AR, Tarkowski T, Kuzminov A, Stahl FW. 1997. Annealing vs. invasion in phage lambda recombination. Genetics 147:961–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Symington LS, Morrison P, Kolodner R. 1985. Intramolecular recombination of linear DNA catalyzed by the Escherichia coli RecE recombination system. J Mol Biol 186:515–525. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90126-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Luisi-DeLuca C, Lovett ST, Kolodner RD. 1989. Genetic and physical analysis of plasmid recombination in recB recC sbcB and recB recC sbcA Escherichia coli K-12 mutants. Genetics 122:269–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Luisi-DeLuca C, Kolodner RD. 1992. Effect of terminal non-homology on intramolecular recombination of linear plasmid substrates in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 227:72–80. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90682-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Silberstein Z, Shalit M, Cohen A. 1993. Heteroduplex strand-specificity in restriction-stimulated recombination by the RecE pathway of Escherichia coli. Genetics 133:439–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Costantino N, Court DL. 2003. Enhanced levels of lambda Red-mediated recombinants in mismatch repair mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:15748–15753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2434959100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huen MS, Li XT, Lu L-Y, Watt RM, Liu D-P, Huang J-D. 2006. The involvement of replication in single-stranded oligonucleotide-mediated gene repair. Nucleic Acids Res 34:6183–6194. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li XT, Thomason LC, Sawitzke JA, Costantino N, Court DL. 2013. Bacterial DNA polymerases participate in oligonucleotide recombination. Mol Microbiol 88:906–920. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Poteete AR. 2013. Involvement of Escherichia coli DNA replication proteins in phage lambda Red-mediated homologous recombination. PLoS One 8:e67440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Poteete AR. 2008. Involvement of DNA replication in phage lambda Red-mediated recombination. Mol Microbiol 68:66–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Maresca M, Erler A, Fu J, Friedrich A, Zhang Y, Stewart AF. 2010. Single-stranded heteroduplex intermediates in lambda red homologous recombination. BMC Mol Biol 11:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kelley WS, Joyce CM. 1983. Genetic characterization of early amber mutations in the Escherichia coli polA gene and purification of the amber peptides. J Mol Biol 164:529–560. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90049-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kingsbury DT, Helinski DR. 1973. Temperature-sensitive mutants for the replication of plasmids in Escherichia coli: requirement for deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase I in the replication of the plasmid ColE1. J Bacteriol 114:1116–1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sawitzke JA, Costantino N, Li XT, Thomason LC, Bubunenko M, Court C, Court DL. 2011. Probing cellular processes with oligo-mediated recombination and using the knowledge gained to optimize recombineering. J Mol Biol 407:45–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Thomason LC, Costantino N, Shaw DV, Court DL. 2007. Multicopy plasmid modification with phage lambda Red recombineering. Plasmid 58:148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li Z, Karakousis G, Chiu SK, Reddy G, Radding CM. 1998. The beta protein of phage lambda promotes strand exchange. J Mol Biol 276:733–744. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Noirot P, Gupta RC, Radding CM, Kolodner RD. 2003. Hallmarks of homology recognition by RecA-like recombinases are exhibited by the unrelated Escherichia coli RecT protein. EMBO J 22:324–334. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hall SD, Kolodner RD. 1994. Homologous pairing and strand exchange promoted by the Escherichia coli RecT protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:3205–3209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Modrich P. 1991. Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu Rev Genet 25:229–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hasan AM, Leach DR. 2015. Chromosomal directionality of DNA mismatch repair in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:9388–9393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505370112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gellert M, O’Dea MH, Itoh T, Tomizawa J. 1976. Novobiocin and coumermycin inhibit DNA supercoiling catalyzed by DNA gyrase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73:4474–4478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Staudenbauer WL. 1976. Replication of small plasmids in extracts of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 145:273–280. doi: 10.1007/BF00325823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Orr E, Staudenbauer WL. 1981. An Escherichia coli mutant thermosensitive in the B subunit of DNA gyrase: effect on the structure and replication of the colicin E1 plasmid in vitro. Mol Gen Genet 181:52–56. doi: 10.1007/BF00339004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Butland G, Peregrín-Alvarez JM, Li J, Yang W, Yang X, Canadien V, Starostine A, Richards D, Beattie B, Krogan N, Davey M, Parkinson J, Greenblatt J, Emili A. 2005. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli Nature 433:531–537. doi: 10.1038/nature03239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van Oijen AM, Blainey PC, Crampton DJ, Richardson CC, Ellenberger T, Xie XS. 2003. Single-molecule kinetics of lambda exonuclease reveal base dependence and dynamic disorder. Science 301:1235–1238. doi: 10.1126/science.1084387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mosberg JA, Lajoie MJ, Church GM. 2010. Lambda Red recombineering in Escherichia coli occurs through a fully single-stranded intermediate. Genetics 186:791–799. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.120782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Court DL, Sawitzke JA, Thomason LC. 2002. Genetic engineering using homologous recombination. Annu Rev Genet 36:361–388. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.36.061102.093104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Thomason LC, Sawitzke JA, Li X, Costantino N, Court DL. 2014. Recombineering: genetic engineering in bacteria using homologous recombination. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 106:1.16.1–1.16.39. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0116s106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sawitzke JA, Thomason LC, Costantino N, Bubunenko M, Datta S, Court DL. 2007. Recombineering: in vivo genetic engineering in E. coli, S. enterica, and beyond. Methods Enzymol 421:171–199. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)21015-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sharan SK, Thomason LC, Kuznetsov SG, Court DL. 2009. Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nat Protoc 4:206–223. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Doherty MJ, Morrison PT, Kolodner R. 1983. Genetic recombination of bacterial plasmid DNA: physical and genetic analysis of the products of plasmid recombination in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 167:539–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.