Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2016 Aug 29;9(8):915–918. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.915-918

A study on association of virulence determinants of verotoxic Escherichia coli isolated from cattle calves

Singh Parul 1,✉, Basanti Bist 2, Barkha Sharma 3, Udit Jain 2, Janardan K Yadav 2
PMCID: PMC5021845  PMID: 27651684

Abstract

Aim:

The present study was conducted to find the association among virulence determinants of verotoxic Escherichia coli (VTEC) isolated from cattle calf feces.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 216 cattle calf fecal samples were collected aseptically and processed under required conditions for the isolation of E. coli. The isolates were further subjected to multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) for the detection of virulent genes. All the VTEC isolates were serotyped at the Central Research Institute, Kasauli, Himachal Pradesh. The VTEC isolates were observed for the enterohemolysin production on washed sheep blood agar (wSBA).

Results:

A total of 177 presumptive E. coli were isolated from 216 calf fecal samples revealing an overall prevalence of E. coli to be 81.94%. A total of 32 (14.81%) isolates were detected as VTEC through mPCR. The prevalence of verotoxin genes vt1, vt2, and combination of vt1+vt2 in the VTEC isolates was found to be 12 (37.5%), 14 (43.75%), and 6 (18.75%), respectively. Other virulent genes eaeA and hlyA were found in 6 and 11 VTEC strains with prevalence values of 18.75% and 34.37%, respectively. A total of 13 different O serogroups were revealed in serotyping of 32 VTEC isolates. Out of 32 VTEC strains, only 26 (81.25%) were enterohemolytic on wSBA as they produced the characteristic small, turbid zone of hemolysis around the streaking line. Although enterohemolysin production has been attributed to the presence of hlyA gene, only 11 of 26 enterohemolysin producing VTEC were found to be harboring the hlyA gene (11/26) 42.03%.

Conclusion:

The present study concludes that there might be an association between the presence of verotoxin genes and enterohemolysin production in VTEC group of E. coli.

Keywords: enterohemolysin gene (hlyA), enterohemolysin toxin, intimin gene (eaeA), verotoxic Escherichia coli, verotoxin genes (vt1 and vt2), virulence determinants

Introduction

The emergence of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is one of the biggest challenges for food safety and cattle industry worldwide [1]. The VTEC are also known as Shiga toxin-producing E. coli and are responsible for producing a spectrum of illness in humans including diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura [2,3]. Most of the VTEC associated foodborne infections in humans are supposed to be consumption of foods (undercooked ground beef, unpasteurized dairy products, and vegetables) and water contaminated with ruminant feces and other environmental sources [4,5].

The ruminants are established natural reservoirs of VTEC, carrying it asymptomatically in their intestine and excreting in feces [6]. The prevalence of the VTEC in the cattle feces is generally reported to be high especially in calves [7,8]. More than 400 O:H serotypes of VTEC have been isolated from cattle and humans while over 100 serotypes are found to be linked with human diseases [9,10]. The pathogenicity of VTEC is attributed to a number of virulence factors, including potent verotoxins (VT1 and VT2, encoded by phage-mediated genes vt1 and vt2), an intimin protein associated with attaching and effacing lesions (encoded by eaeA gene) and enterohemolysin, a lytic toxin (encoded by hlyA gene) [11-13]. Several studies have indicated the association between these virulence factors such as vts, hlyA genes, and enterohemolysin production in VTEC serotypes originating from varied sources [14,15], but more research is needed to prove their association.

Thus, this study aims to find the association in virulence determinants of VTEC isolated from cattle calf feces.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

For this study faecal samples were collected from immediately voided faeces of animals. So this work does not require any ethical approval.

Sampling, enrichment, and phenotypic characterization of isolates

A total of 216 fecal samples of cattle calves (below 1 year) were collected from three organized dairy farms of Uttar Pradesh state, from June 2012 to May 2013. All the samples were transported under chilled conditions and processed immediately in the laboratory for the better recovery of E. coli. The 1 g of feces was enriched in 10 ml of trypticase soya broth (HiMedia, India) containing acriflavine (10 mg/L) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h [16]. The enriched inoculum was streaked on MacConkey agar and the resulting lactose fermenting pink, smooth, and round colonies were further streaked on the selective eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar (HiMedia, India) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The colonies showing green metallic sheen on EMB agar were picked as presumptive E. coli and streaked on nutrient agar slants and biochemically confirmed by kit (KB010 Hi E. coli Identification kit-HiMedia, India).

Virulence detection

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) was carried out using four sets of oligonucleotide primers for detection of virulent genes vt1, vt2, eaeA, and hlyA [17]. The template DNA was extracted from a single colony of each isolate using kit (Genei, Bengaluru). The purity and concentration of extracted DNA were detected by nanodrop method (Eppendorf, German). The every 25 µl PCR reaction mixture of contained ×1 PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, each primer at a concentration of 40 nM, 200 µM each of deoxynucleotide triphosphates, one unit of Taq DNA polymerase, and 2.0 µl of template DNA. The PCR reaction was performed in a thermal cycler (Cyber Lab, India) using standard cycling conditions and amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. Standard 100 bp DNA ladder (Genei, Bengaluru) was used as marker.

Serotyping and detection of enterohemolysin (E-hly) toxin

All the isolates that turned out to be positive through mPCR method were also serotyped at the National Salmonella and Escherichia Center, Central Research Institute, Kasauli, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Enterohemolysin production in VTEC isolates was observed as per the method of Beutin et al. [18]. All the isolated VTEC were streaked over 5% washed sheep blood agar (wSBA) plates supplemented with 10 mM calcium chloride incubated at 37°C and examined at 18 h. The VTEC isolates producing small turbid hemolytic zone around the streaking line after 18 h were considered as enterohemolytic.

Results

Phenotypic characterization of VTEC

A total of 177 presumptive E. coli were isolated from 216 fecal samples revealing a total prevalence of 81.94%. These isolates showed pink-colored smooth colonies on MLA and produced distinct, clear greenish metallic sheen over EMB. All the isolates showing following biochemical reactions as negative for Voges-Proskauer, hydrogen sulfide, citrate, oxidase and urease production, and positive for indole and methyl red tests were biochemically confirmed as E. coli.

Detection of virulent genes

A total of 32 E. coli isolates from calf feces found to be positive for virulent genes (vt1, vt2, eaeA, and hlyA) by mPCR showing a prevalence of 14.8%. The virulent genes were present either singly or in combinations, showing a prevalence of vt1, vt2, and (vt1+vt2) genes as 12 (37.5%), 14 (43.75%), and 6 (18.75%), respectively. Other virulent genes eaeA and hlyA were present in 6 and 11 VTEC strains showing prevalence values 18.75% and 34.37%, respectively (Table-1).

Table-1.

Distribution of virulent genes (vt1, vt2, eaeA, and hlyA) and enterohemolysin production in VTEC isolates from cattle calves feces.

Serotypes Number of VTEC isolates vt1 vt2 vt1+vt2 eaeA hlyA Enterohemolysin production
O9 4 − − + − + +
O11 5 + − − − + +
O26 1 + − − + − +
O27 2 − + − − − +
O34 2 − + − − − −
O52 4 − + − − − −
O56 3 − + − − − +
O81 3 + − − + − +
O83 2 + − − − − +
O84 1 − + − − − +
O91 1 + − − + − +
O134 2 − + − − − +
O156 2 − − + + + +
Open in a new tab

VTEC=Verotoxic Escherichia coli

Serotyping

A total of 13 different O serogroups were revealed on serotyping of 32 VTEC isolates (Table-1). Of these serotypes, four were identified as O9, O26, O91, and O156, which have been shown to be associated with HUS in human being.

Detection of enterohemolysin (E-hly) in VTEC

In the hemolysis assay, out of 32 VTEC isolates, 26 (81.25%) showed the enterohemolysin production on wSBA as they produced small, turbid zone of hemolysis around the streaking line. All the 26 enterohemolytic VTEC isolates revealed with verotoxin genes as 12 (46.5%) had vt1 gene, 8 (30.76%) isolates harbored vt2 gene, and 6 (23.07%) isolates had both the genes (vt1+vt2). Although enterohemolysin production has been attributed the presence of hlyA gene, only 11 of 26 enterohemolysin producing VTEC were found to be harboring the hlyA gene 11 (42.03%).

Discussion

In the present study, the prevalence of E. coli in the feces of cattle calves was 81.94%. The prevalence value of current study had nearly coincided with the findings of other countries as in Iran (86.7%) [19], Egypt (75.6%) [20], and India (75%) [21], whereas the lower prevalence was reported in Egypt (63.6%) [22].

During the study, 14.81% E. coli isolates were found as VTEC through mPCR in the calves feces. The serotyping results of the current study depicted that all the VTEC isolates were belonged to the non-O157 VTEC group. The wide range of prevalence values of non-O157 VTEC (0.42 to 74%) and E. coli O157:H7 (0.2 to 48.8%) has been reported from cattle feces worldwide [23]. The prevalence of VTEC reported in our study lies within globally reported a range of VTEC from cattle feces. Almost similar prevalence of VTEC has been reported in another study from India by Mishra et al. 13.4% [24] while higher prevalence values have been reported from other places such as Egypt (26.7%) [25], California (37.9%) [26], Ireland (40%) [27], and Florida (58.1%) [6]. The wide variations in prevalence values of E. coli and VTEC in calves feces can be attributed to epidemiological determinants such as stocking density, age, sex, and season, whereas sampling strategy, sample handling, and laboratory methods might also have profound effect on prevalence values reported in different countries [28,29].

The enterohemolysin is a lytic toxin which is encoded by a large virulence plasmid and was initially supposed to be produced by VTEC group of E. coli. The association of enterohemolysin production and VTEC group of E. coli was first identified by Beutin et al. [18] and later on this correlation was reported by numerous other research workers. In this investigation, the prevalence of enterohemolysin production was 26 (81.25%) which is almost similar to 89.9% reported by Rathore et al. [30] from cattle feces. In various other studies, prevalence values of enterohemolysin production by VTEC isolated from feces and other sources have been found as 31.18% [15], 68.29% [31], 86% [14], and 97.6% [32].

In few studies, a genomic relation has been studied with the production of enterohemolysin toxin in VTEC group of E. coli. In a study by Meng et al. [33], all 120 E. coli O157:H7 isolates harboring verotoxin genes produced the enterohemolysin. In another report, all the E. coli O157 isolates were found positive for hlyA gene and enterohemolytic phenotype [34]. In spite of the association of enterohemolysin production with hlyA gene, the verotoxin gene vt1 was also found evident in enterohemolysin production in non-O157 VTEC isolates [15]. In the current study, the 26 non-O157 VTEC isolates were enterohemolytic on wSBA and only 11 VTEC isolates (40.03%) were revealed the presence of hlyA gene while the rest of isolates were harbored either vt1, vt2, or both (vt1+vt2) the verotoxin genes but still produced this toxin on wSBA (Table-1). It enforces the fact that the mere presence of hlyA gene might not be the sole factor for the production of enterohemolysin, but the presence of verotoxin genes (either vt1, vt2, or both) also might favor its production of enterohemolysin thereby enhance the virulence of VTEC. The present study concludes that there might be an association between the presence of verotoxin genes and enterohemolysin production in VTEC group of E. coli.

Conclusion

The zoonotic agent VTEC contaminates the food chain and constitutes the major public health hazard. It is necessary to know all possible virulence factors for its control. The present study concludes that there might be an association between the presence of verotoxin genes and enterohemolysin production in VTEC group of E. coli. There is further need to study more on virulence factors of VTEC.

Authors’ Contributions

SP, BB, BS, UJ, and JKY executed the study design and analyzed the data. SP performed the entire study under the guidance of BB. SP drafted and revised the manuscript with the help of BS and UJ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their heartfelt thanks to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, for providing funds and necessary facilities through the project entitled “Outreach research programme on zoonotic diseases on vero cytotoxic”’ to carry out part of the research work.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Callaway T.R, Edrington T.S, Loneragan G.H, Carr M.A, Nisbet D.J. Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC ecology in cattle and management based options for reducing fecal shedding. Agric. Food Anal. Bacteriol. 2013;3:39–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beraldo L.G, Borges C.A, Maluta R.P, Cardozo M.V, Rigobelo E.C, A´vila F.A. Detection of Shiga toxigenic (STEC) and enteropathogenic (EPEC)Escherichia coli in dairy buffalo. Vet. Microbiol. 2014;170:162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parul B.B, Sharma B, Jain U. Virulence associated factors and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and soil. Vet. World. 2014;7(5):369–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bonardi S, Alpigiani I, Tozzoli R, Vismarra A, Zecca V, Greppi C, Bacci C, Bruini I, Brindani F. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157, O26 and O111 in cattle faeces and hides in Italy. Vet Rec Open. 2015;2(1):e000061. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000061. DOI:10.1136/vetreco-2014-000061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duffy G, Burgess C.M, Bolton D.J. A review of factors that affect the transmission and survival of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the European farm to fork chain. Meat Sci. 2014;97:375–383. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mir R.A, Weppelmann T.A, Kang M, Bliss T.M, DiLorenzo N, Lamb G.C, Ahn S, Jeong K.C. Association between animal age and the prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in a cohort of beef cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 2015;175:325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dastmalchi S.H, Ayremlou N. Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in faeces of healthy and diarrheic calves in Urmia region. Iran J Microbiol. 2012;4(2):63–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Islam M.Z, Musekiwa A, Islam K, Ahmed S, Chowdhury S, Ahad A. Regional variation in the prevalence of E. coli O157 in cattle: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093299. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Karma M.R, Jhonson P, McEwen A, Gyles L. Prevalence and characterization of verotoxin producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) in cattle from an Ontario abattoir. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2008;72(4):297–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hernandez R.G, McMullen L, Gänzle M.G. Development and validation of a surrogate strain cocktail to evaluate bactericidal effects of pressure on verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015;205:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thomas K.M, McCann M.S, Collery M.M, Logan A, Whyte P, McDowell D.A, Duffy G. Tracking verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157, O26, O111, O103 and O145 in Irish cattle. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2012;153:288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bosilevac J.M, Koohmaraie M. Prevalence and characterization of non O157Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from commercial ground beef in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:2103–2112. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02833-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sinha N, Kshirsagar D.P, Brahmbhatt M.N, Nayak J.B. Detection and virulence gene characterization of Shiga toxigenic E. coli from buffalo meat samples. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2015;49(5):694–698. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hazarika R.A, Singh D.K, Kapoor K.N, Agrawal R.K, Pandey A.B, Rajkumar D.N. Detection and charecterization of verotoxin -producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) isolated from buffalo meat. J. Food Saf. 2004;24:281–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bhong C.D, Brahmbhatt M.N, Joshi C.G, Rank D.N. Detection of virulence determinants by real time PCR in E. coli isolated from mutton. Meat Sci. 2008;80:1129–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Edward P.R, Ewing W.H. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Minnesota, USA: Burgess Publishing Company; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paton J.C, Paton A.W. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:450–479. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.3.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beutin L, Montenegro M.A, Orskov I, Orskov F, Prada J, Zimmermann S, Stephan R. Close association of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin) production with enterohaemolysin production in strains of Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1989;27:2559–2564. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2559-2564.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pourtaghi H, Dahpahlavan V, Momtaz H. Virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from calves with diarrhoea in Iran. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2013;22:513–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El-Seedy F.R, Abed A.H, Yanni H.A, El-Rahman S.A.A. Prevalence of Salmonella and E. coli in neonatal diarrheic calves. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2016;5:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bjbas.2015.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hemashenpagam N, Kiruthiga B, Selvaraj T, Panneerselvam A. Isolation, identification and characterization of bacterial pathogens causing calf diarrhoea with special reference to Escherichia coli. Int. J. Microbiol. 2009;7(2):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Osman K.M, Mustafa A.M, Elhariri M, Abdelhamed G.S. The distribution of Escherichia coli serovars, virulence genes, gene association and combinations and virulence genes encoding serotypes in pathogenic E. coli recovered from diarrhoeic calves, sheep and goat. Trans. Emerg. Dis. 2013;60(1):69–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2012.01319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hussein H.S, Sakuma T. Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in dairy cattle and their products. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88:450–465. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72706-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mishra R.P, Jain U, Bist B, Verma A.K, Kumar A. prevalence of verotoxic Escherichia coli in faecal samples of domestic as well as wild ruminants in Mathura district and Kanpur zoo. Vet. World. 2016;9(1):71–74. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.71-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ghoneim N.H, Abdel-Moein K.A, Mohamed M.A. Are non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli imposing their predominance over O157 in farm animals and human? Glob. Vet. 2014;12(5):636–642. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cooley M.B, Jay-Russell M, Atwill E.R, Carychao D, Nguyen K, Quiñones B. Development of a robust method for isolation of Shiga toxin-positive Escherichia coli (STEC) from fecal, plant, soil and water samples from a leafy greens production region in California. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065716. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0065716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Monaghan A, Byrne B, Fanning S, Sweeney T, McDowell D, Bolton D.J. Serotypes and virulence profiles of non-O157. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from bovine farms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(24):8662–8668. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06190-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Amézquita-López B.A, Quiñones L.B.G, Chaidez C. Virulence profiling of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli recovered from domestic farm animals in North Western Mexico. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00007. DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2014.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cho Y, Yoon K.J. An overview of calf diarrhea-infectious etiology, diagnosis, and intervention. J. Vet. Sci. 2014;15(1):1–17. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2014.15.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rathore R.S, Bachhil V.N, Agarwal R.K, Kapoor K.N. Enterohaemolysin production: An important screening test for detection of verotoxic Escherichia coli. Indian J. Comp. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. Dis. 2002;23:197–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Banerjee R, Kapoor K.N, Agrawal R.K, Gbatak S. Verotoxin producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) in foods of animal origin. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2001;38:82–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bettelheim K.A. Identification of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli by means of their production of enterohemolysin. J Appl Bacteriol. 1995;79:178–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb00932.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Meng J, Jaho S, Doyle M.P. virulence genes of Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli isolated from food, animals and humans. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998;45:229–235. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00163-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aslantas O, Erdogan S, Cantekin Z, Gulacti I, Gulsum A, Evrendilek Isolation and characterization of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 from Turkish cattle. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006;106:338–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES