Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Sep 14;6:33166. doi: 10.1038/srep33166

Replicating Cardiovascular Condition-Birth Month Associations

Li Li 1,2,a,*, Mary Regina Boland 3,4,5,6,b,*, Riccardo Miotto 1,2,*, Nicholas P Tatonetti 3,4,5,6,†, Joel T Dudley 1,2,†
PMCID: PMC5021975  PMID: 27624541

Abstract

Independent replication is vital for study findings drawn from Electronic Health Records (EHR). This replication study evaluates the relationship between seasonal effects at birth and lifetime cardiovascular condition risk. We performed a Season-wide Association Study on 1,169,599 patients from Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) to compute phenome-wide associations between birth month and CVD. We then evaluated if seasonal patterns found at MSH matched those reported at Columbia University Medical Center. Coronary arteriosclerosis, essential hypertension, angina, and pre-infarction syndrome passed phenome-wide significance and their seasonal patterns matched those previously reported. Atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and chronic myocardial ischemia had consistent patterns but were not phenome-wide significant. We confirm that CVD risk peaks for those born in the late winter/early spring among the evaluated patient populations. The replication findings bolster evidence for a seasonal birth month effect in CVD. Further study is required to identify the environmental and developmental mechanisms.

External replication and validation are essential to medical research1,2. The importance of replication has been demonstrated multiple times in the field of genetics where ethnic biases and other unanticipated confounding have led to novel findings that were irreproducible at other research centers2. Methods that utilize data obtained from Electronic Health Records (EHRs), such as Phenome-Wide Association Studies (PheWAS)3 require particular scrutiny4,5,6 as EHR-derived phenotype data can exhibit many biases that can influence results7. These include biases originating from variation in data quality8, the health-care process, and documentation7. Robust informatics-based methods attempt to adjust for these biases. However, replication and validation of novel findings remain critical for building confidence in EHR-based findings.

Recently, two of the co-authors (Boland and Tatonetti) developed a method called SeaWAS: Season-Wide Association Study that reveals relationships between birth month (as a proxy for prenatal/perinatal seasonality) and lifetime disease risk9. The SeaWAS method identified several novel birth month-disease relationships from EHR data9. The initial SeaWAS findings were based on data obtained from a patient population at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) located in New York City (NYC). SeaWAS replicated several previously reported disease-birth month findings. Those findings include asthma10, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder11, and reproductive performance12. In this study we attempt to validate previously reported SeaWAS findings using EHR data obtained from another academic medical center within NYC. The rationale for choosing this population is that they are independent, but representative, of the original study population and were likely exposed to the same seasonal climate conditions13. Specifically, we applied the SeaWAS method to an independent EHR data set representing a clinical population of 1,169,599 patients from Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) in New York City. We found evidence to replicate seven of nine birth month-dependent cardiovascular conditions reported from the original SeaWAS study. These findings build confidence in several associations between birth month and cardiovascular condition risk. They also suggest the importance of further investigation into potential mechanisms underlying the increased risk.

Methods

Population

To perform a proper replication study, we sought to follow the original SeaWAS study as closely as possible9. We used electronic medical record data from Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) located in NYC. Both CUMC and MSH are urban medical centers located in NYC and we expect they both would be subject to similar climate conditions13. EHR data at MSH is represented using a different schema and data module than was used in the original SeaWAS study at CUMC. Therefore we mapped the locally obtained International Classification of Diseases, version 9 (ICD-9) codes used at MSH to the Systemized Nomenclature for Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) using the mapping table from the CDM v.414. Approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at MSH.

We extracted all individuals born between 1926 and 2000 inclusive (1,169,599 patients) who were treated at MSH (between 1979–2015), demographics given in Table 1. The median age of the MSH population was 53 years (interquartile range, IQR: 36–66), which skews older than the original CUMC population (median = 38 years, IQR: 22–58). Race and ethnicity demographics are represented differently between the MSH and CUMC datasets. At MSH, Hispanic could be reported as a race or an ethnicity or both (Table 1). Differences in the way that race and ethnicity are collected can result in some differences15. Overall sex, race, and ethnicity distributions did not differ significantly between the two institutions (p > 0.05, Table 1).

Table 1. Demographics of Patients Included in SeaWAS: CUMC and Mt Sinai.

Demographic CUMC N (%), N = 1,749,400 Mt Sinai M (%),M = 1,169,599 P
Sex1     1.000
 Female 956,465 (54.67%) 678,717 (58.03%)  
 Male 791,534 (45.25%) 490,600 (41.95%)  
 Other/Unidentified 1,401 (0.08%) 282 (0.02%)  
Race     0.603
 White 665,366 (38.03%) 424,803 (36.32%)  
 Other1 456,185 (26.08%) 165,423 (14.14%)  
 Unidentified/Unknown 386, 533 (22.10%) 256,819 (21.96%)  
 Black 189,123 (10.81%) 166,950 (14.27%)  
 Declined 29,747 (1.70%) NA  
 Asian 20,746 (1.19%) 45,596 (3.90%)  
 Native American/Indian 1,511 (0.09%) 2,447 (0.21%)  
 Pacific Islander 189 (0.01%) 1,094 (0.09%)  
 Hispanic/Latino NA 106,467 (9.10%)  
Ethnicity     0.656
 Non-Hispanic 590,386 (33.75%) 761,535 (65.11%)  
 Unidentified 458,071 (26.18%) 208,899 (17.86%)  
 Hispanic 361,123 (20.64%) 199,165 (17.03%)  
 Declined 339,820 (19.42%) NA  
Other Attributes   Median (1st, 3rd Quartile)
Total SNOMED-CT codes per patient 6 (1, 32) 7 (3, 22)
Distinct SNOMED-CT codes per patient 3 (1, 8) 5 (2, 10)
Age (year of service – year of birth) 38 (22, 58) 53* (36, 66)
Treatment Year Range 1985–2013 1979–2015
Open in a new tab

1Other (includes Hispanics not otherwise identified).

*Computed in days, age in years = age in days/365.25.

Replicating Cardiovascular Condition – Birth Month Associations

We are especially interested in cardiovascular condition – birth month associations because they represent the novel findings from the original SeaWAS study9. Also at both institutions (CUMC and MSH) essential hypertension (associated with birth month at CUMC) was the most prevalent disease, signifying the clinical importance of this association. Therefore, we selected only circulatory system conditions (as defined using the ICD-9 codes) that were present in both the MSH and CUMC datasets (i.e., having at least 1000 patients at both MSH and CUMC). This represented a set of 108 conditions.

We modified the SeaWAS algorithm obtained from the public domain (code available here: https://github.com/maryreginaboland/SeaWAS) to fit the database schema of MSH. We first performed a phenome-wide exploration of all birth month – disease associations for conditions with at least 1000 patients (1433 conditions). We employed the Benjamini-Hochberg method to correct for multiple hypotheses and control for the false discovery rate (FDR)16 similar to the original study.

Next, we performed a post-hoc analysis, using Pearson’s correlation, to compare the birth month - disease risk curves between the two institutions (CUMC, MSH). We assess statistical significance by comparing the actual correlation between the two institutions to an empirically derived null distribution. We generated empirical null distributions for each condition by randomizing the birth month–disease risk curve from MSH. We then computed the Pearson correlation for the random curve and CUMC’s birth month-disease risk curve. We repeated this procedure 1000 times producing 1000 random correlation results. We determined the empirically derived p-value as the proportion of random correlations greater than the actual correlation between true MSH data and true CUMC data divided by 1000. If this value is zero then the p-value is reported as “p < 0.001.”

To place our findings in the context of biological mechanisms deemed important in birth month associations, we obtained peak flu season data obtained from the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) data on flu activity from 1982–83 through 2013–1417. We also compared the serum vitamin D levels reported in Meier et al. 200418.

Results

Phenome-Wide SeaWAS Results at MSH

We used SeaWAS to mine birth month associations at MSH for all 1433 conditions with at least 1000 individuals born between 1926 and 2000, inclusive. We applied multiplicity correction using FDR to adjust the p-values. We limited our analysis to only the circulatory system conditions (as defined by the ICD-9 codes) that were found in both datasets, allowing us to compare the patterns of birth month-disease risk between the two institutions. SeaWAS-CUMC analysis found 9 circulatory system conditions were associated with birth month at an FDR threshold of 0.05 computed phenome-wide (1433 conditions) (Fig. 1). Four of the circulatory disease associations were also found to be significant phenome-wide at MSH, namely, Coronary arteriosclerosis, Essential hypertension, Angina, and Pre-infarction syndrome.

Figure 1. Manhattan Plot for Circulatory System Conditions for Mount Sinai (or MSH) and CUMC.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Four conditions were found significant phenome-wide at both institutions: Coronary arteriosclerosis, Essential hypertension, Angina and Pre-infarction syndrome. Interestingly, Atrial fibrillation (most significant finding from CUMC) was not found to be significant phenome-wide at MSH.

Pattern Analysis of Circulatory System Disease Risk – Birth Month Curves: MSH and CUMC

We performed pattern analysis of the birth month – disease risk curves for the circulatory system conditions between MSH and CUMC (set of 108 conditions). This was done to ascertain whether or not the birth month – disease relationship was the same between the two institutions. We found that seven of nine CUMC findings had significantly similar patterns at MSH (Table 2). More detailed information on all 108 conditions can be found in the Supplemental File 1. The ICD-9 codes corresponding to each of the nine conditions in Table 2 are given in Supplemental File 2. In Fig. 2, we show the seasonal risk patterns at birth obtained from MSH and CUMC for all nine circulatory system conditions. Four of these nine circulatory system conditions were also significant at the phenome-wide level at MSH. Two associations, congestive cardiac failure and mitral valve disorder, did not have statistically significant patterns.

Table 2. Replication Results for Circulatory System Conditions Between MSH and CUMC: Phenome-Wide P-values and Pearson Correlation P-values.

Condition Condition Type Birth Month Risk - MSH
 Birth Month Risk - CUMC
 MSH CUMC MSH CUMC Pearson Corr.
Low High Low High Max RR Max RR P* P* P**
Atrial fibrillation Symptom 11 2 9 3 1.050 1.056 0.226 2.1 × 10−10 0.007
Coronary arteriosclerosis Disease 9 1 9 4 1.070 1.039 2.46 × 10−15 3.1 × 10−8 <0.001
Essential hypertension Symptom 10 1 9 1 1.029 1.020 0.003 1.3 × 10−5 0.005
Congestive cardiac failure State 11 8 9 1 1.042 1.030 0.760 2.2 × 10−4 0.222
Angina Symptom 9 1 9 4 1.091 1.070 0.002 6.5 × 10−4 0.003
Cardiomyopathy Disease 11 8 9 1 1.045 1.064 0.760 8.6 × 10−3 0.030
Chronic myocardial ischemia Event 11 2 9 4 1.069 1.084 0.834 0.022 0.031
Mitral valve disorder Disease 9 7 12 3 1.057 1.063 0.562 0.024 0.445
Pre-infarction syndrome Symptom 9 1 10 6 1.058 1.051 0.022 0.036 0.036
Open in a new tab

*Phenome-Wide P-value, FDR adjusted (1688 conditions for CUMC, 1433 for Mt. Sinai).

**Empirically Derived P-value Using Random Permutations of Mt Sinai’s birth month distribution.

Bold indicates phenome-wide significance was attained at both CUMC and Mt. Sinai.

Figure 2. Cardiovascular Condition Risk vs. Birth Month Results from CUMC and MSH.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) shows results from all nine cardiovascular conditions from both MSH (red line) and CUMC (blue line). Seven of nine cardiovascular conditions were correlated at a statistically significant level with MSH data (i.e., the birth month – condition patterns were correlated) using Pearson’s correlation. A significant pattern across the two institutions indicates that the birth month – condition relationship is the same. (B) shows the most correlated result between MSH and CUMC was coronary arteriosclerosis (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). (C) shows the comparison with the peak flu season month using CDC data on flu activity from 1982–83 through 2013–14 (URL: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/season/flu-season.htm). We also compared the serum vitamin D levels reported in Meier et al.18 in (D). We found that birth months that are also months with high serum vitamin D (Jul–Oct.) were ideal for lower coronary arteriosclerosis risk. Additionally, birth months with a high flu burden (Jan–Mar.) were high-risk birth months for coronary arteriosclerosis. This does not indicate that being born in flu season causes coronary arteriosclerosis later in life nor does it indicate that being born in a high vitamin D season lowers risk of coronary arteriosclerosis. These findings merely show support for proposed biological mechanisms, which require further validation from biologists.

We overlaid data on seasonal variation in vitamin D levels and flu diagnosis levels to identify trends that could imply a biological rationale for observed cardiovascular – birth month association patterns. Figure 2D shows the seasonal variation in vitamin D levels18 along with the birth month – coronary arteriosclerosis risk curves from MSH and CUMC. Low vitamin D months correspond to high coronary arteriosclerosis risk birth months (Fig. 2B). In Fig. 2C, we also included data from the CDC (http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/season/flu-season.htm) containing the number of times each month was the peak month for a given flu season. This data was aggregated from 1982–83 through 2013–1417.

Discussion

Replication of novel research findings is critical to biomedical research1,2. Findings derived from EHRs are particularly important to replicate due to inherent biases present in EHR data4,5,7,8. For these reasons, we performed a phenome-wide SeaWAS using data from MSH to replicate previously reported associations between birth month and cardiovascular condition risk9. MSH is an ideal replication site as it shares climate and geography with the original site (CUMC)13. Seven of nine circulatory system conditions identified in the original SeaWAS-CUMC study had significantly correlated birth month – disease risk patterns. Additionally, four of these were significant at the phenome-wide level at MSH (Table 2).

Replication of Main Cardiovascular Condition Findings Between MSH and CUMC Results

Coronary arteriosclerosis, essential hypertension, angina and pre-infarction syndrome were all significantly associated with birth month at the phenome-wide level at both MSH (after adjusting for 1433 tests) and CUMC (after adjusting for 1688 tests). Their seasonal patterns were also significantly correlated (Table 2, Fig. 2) supporting the connection between these conditions and birth month. While the patterns were highly correlated, in some instances the birth month with the max Relative Risk (RR) differed between the two institutions. For example, angina and coronary arteriosclerosis both experienced maximum RR’s in April using CUMC data versus January for the MSH data. However, the patterns for both of these conditions were highly correlated (coronary arteriosclerosis, r = 0.830; angina, r = 0.715). This underscores the importance of analyzing the entire pattern (Fig. 2) versus merely selecting maximum or minimum birth months to avoid misleading results.

Three conditions, atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and chronic myocardial ischemia, were significantly correlated between CUMC and MSH but were not significantly associated with birth month at the phenome-wide level at MSH. These conditions could be associated with birth month through their common comorbidities, namely essential hypertension, angina, coronary arteriosclerosis and pre-infarction syndrome19. However, it could also be the effect of sample size between the two institutions and the effects of stringent phenome-wide p-value adjustment. Many of these conditions had lower maximum RRs at MSH. For example, chronic myocardial ischemia had a maximum RR of 1.069 (0.973, 1.174) at MSH vs. 1.084 (1.011, 1.162) at CUMC. The significant correlation of the patterns between the two institutions supports the hypothesis of an underlying birth month effect for these conditions.

There are several additional reasons why results from CUMC and MSH may differ. Firstly, many of these circulatory system conditions are comorbid with one another (e.g., atrial fibrillation often occurs with other conditions such as essential hypertension)19. Conditions that replicated across institutions were ‘core’ heart conditions, such as essential hypertension, that often occur in the presence of other cardiac ailments20. These conditions may actually be driving the disease risk – birth month association. If this is the case, then they remain significant across institutions (provided the climate is the same). While both hospitals are located in NYC, they may serve patients with different socioeconomic demographics. These differences could play a role in the accessibility of certain healthcare options. Importantly, in spite of these issues, seven of nine CUMC circulatory system findings had statistically significant patterns at MSH9.

Underlying Biological Mechanisms for Birth Month - Cardiovascular Condition Risk: Learning from Both MSH and CUMC

Several mechanisms have been proposed previously that could explain the relationship between cardiovascular conditions and birth month9. Vitamin D deficiency is known to increase cardiovascular disease risk, this is especially true for patients who already have essential hypertension21. Furthermore, vitamin D levels have been shown to vary seasonally in women18. Vitamin D levels in babies also depends on maternal vitamin D22. Another hypothesis to explain cardiovascular – birth month relationships is maternal flu infection. Researchers found that children born to survivors of the H1N1 1918 subtype had a >20% excess risk of cardiovascular disease later in life23. Maternal infection tends to be higher in the winter months (January–March) therefore this could contribute to increased risk among children born in those months.

Figure 2 shows that low vitamin D months correspond to high coronary arteriosclerosis risk birth months. However when vitamin D is low (Fig. 2D), the risk for flu infection is also high (Fig. 2C). It is unclear which mechanism (maternal flu infection and vitamin D) is potentially responsible for the birth month association. It could also be a combination of both mechanisms. Flu infection is high during the birth months with the highest risk, but vitamin D levels are also at their lowest during this same period (Fig. 2C,D). Also vitamin D plays a role in immune response24,25, which could indicate that peak flu season and low vitamin D occur together for a mechanistic reason (and are not independent of each other). Our confirmation of a link between cardiovascular conditions and birth month across two institutions – MSH and CUMC – in the same climate (NYC)13 supports the hypothesis that a biological mechanism tied to climate and seasonality can explain this increase in disease risk. Further research may elucidate whether vitamin D or flu infection, or a combination of the two, is contributing to the increase of cardiovascular condition risk by birth month.

Limitations

A limitation of our approach includes the exclusive use of diagnosis codes collected during the clinical encounter and recorded in EHRs. Therefore, we know that these patients were diagnosed with a cardiovascular condition, but they may not necessarily have had cardiovascular disease. We used only diagnosis codes in order to properly validate the original results presented in Boland et al.9. Nine cardiovascular condition – birth month relationships were identified as significant in Boland et al.9. Only three of these nine conditions were diseases (Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Arteriosclerosis, and Mitral valve disorder), four were symptoms (Essential hypertension, Angina, Pre-infarction syndrome, Atrial fibrillation), one was indicative of an event (Chronic myocardial ischemia) and one was indicative of the patient state (Congestive cardiac failure). Importantly, we validated seven of nine cardiovascular conditions at MSH.

The condition most correlated between MSH and CUMC was coronary arteriosclerosis (Fig. 2B), which is a diagnosis for Coronary Artery Disease (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). Two conditions that failed to replicate were heart failure-related. Mitral valve disorder is a disease that can lead to heart failure and congestive cardiac failure is a diagnosis of the patient state indicating heart failure. We found that the conditions that validated across both sites were indicative of Coronary Artery Disease (coronary arteriosclerosis, chronic myocardial ischemia) and not heart failure.

Conclusion

In this replication study, we study the cardiovascular condition – birth month relationship at another institution (MSH) with the same climate and urban setting as CUMC (both located in NYC). We found that seven of nine cardiovascular conditions associated with birth month at CUMC were also significantly correlated with the patterns revealed at MSH. These findings support the relationship between risk for cardiovascular conditions and birth month. We describe two leading putative mechanisms behind this relationship: maternal infection and low vitamin D levels. We also discuss the possibility of a combined mechanism (vitamin D is also involved in immune response) underlying the disease – birth month observations. Further study is required to identify the particular environmental and developmental mechanisms driving the observed associations.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Li, L. et al. Replicating Cardiovascular Condition-Birth Month Associations. Sci. Rep. 6, 33166; doi: 10.1038/srep33166 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File 1
srep33166-s1.csv (17.8KB, csv)
Supplementary File 2
srep33166-s2.csv (389B, csv)

Acknowledgments

MRB was supported by the National Library of Medicine training grant T15 LM00707. R01 GM107145 (NPT) also supported both MRB and NPT. This study was supported by funding from the NIDDK (R01DK098242) and NCI (U54CA189201) to JTD.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: M.R.B., L.L. and N.P.T. Performed the experiments: M.R.B., R.M. and L.L. Analyzed the data: M.R.B., R,M, and L.L. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: M.R.B., L.L., R.M., J.T.D. and N.P.T. Wrote the paper: M.R.B. and L.L. Edited and approved the paper: M.R.B., L.L., R.M., J.D. and N.P.T.

References

  1. Ioannidis J. P. et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 383, 166–175, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ioannidis J. P., Ntzani E. E., Trikalinos T. A. & Contopoulos-Ioannidis D. G. Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nature genetics 29, 306–309, doi: 10.1038/ng749 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Denny J. C. et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics 26, 1205–1210, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq126 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gottesman O. et al. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 15, 761–771, doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.72 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crawford D. C. et al. eMERGEing progress in genomics-the first seven years. Frontiers in genetics 5, 184, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00184 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll R. J. et al. Portability of an algorithm to identify rheumatoid arthritis in electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 19, e162–e169 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boland M. R., Hripcsak G., Shen Y., Chung W. K. & Weng C. Defining a comprehensive verotype using electronic health records for personalized medicine. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 20, e232–e238, doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001932 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weiskopf N. G. & Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 20, 144–151, doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boland M. R., Shahn Z., Madigan D., Hripcsak G. & Tatonetti N. P. Birth month affects lifetime disease risk: a phenome-wide method. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 22, 1042–1053, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv046 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Korsgaard J. & Dahl R. Sensitivity to house dust mite and grass pollen in adults. Influence of the month of birth. Clinical allergy 13, 529–535 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Halldner L. et al. Relative immaturity and ADHD: findings from nationwide registers, parent- and self-reports. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines 55, 897–904, doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12229 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huber S., Fieder M., Wallner B., Moser G. & Arnold W. Brief communication: birth month influences reproductive performance in contemporary women. Human reproduction 19, 1081–1082, doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh247 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boland M. R., Hripcsak G., Ryan P. & Tatonetti N. P. A Climate-Wide Journey to Explore Mechanisms Underlying Birth Month-Disease Risk Associations: A Call for Collaboration.
  14. Overhage J. M., Ryan P. B., Reich C. G., Hartzema A. G. & Stang P. E. Validation of a common data model for active safety surveillance research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 19, 54–60, doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000376 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Polubriaginof F., Boland M. R., Perotte A. & Vawdrey D. Quality of Race and Ethnicity Data in Electronic Health Records. AMIA Translational Informatics Joint Summits. In Press (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. Benjamini Y. & Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  17. CDC. The Flu Season. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/season/flu-season.htm (2014).
  18. Meier C., Woitge H. W., Witte K., Lemmer B. & Seibel M. J. Supplementation with oral vitamin D3 and calcium during winter prevents seasonal bone loss: a randomized controlled open‐label prospective trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 19, 1221–1230 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Benjamin E. J. et al. Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Risk of Death: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 98, 946–952, doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Blair S. N., Kampert J. B., Kohl H. W. Iii et al. INfluences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women. JAMA 276, 205–210, doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540030039029 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee J. H., O’Keefe J. H., Bell D., Hensrud D. D. & Holick M. F. Vitamin D deficiency: an important, common, and easily treatable cardiovascular risk factor? Journal of the American College of Cardiology 52, 1949–1956 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee J. M. et al. Vitamin D deficiency in a healthy group of mothers and newborn infants. Clinical Pediatrics 46, 42–44 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mazumder B., Almond D., Park K., Crimmins E. M. & Finch C. E. Lingering prenatal effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic on cardiovascular disease. Journal of developmental origins of health and disease 1, 26–34 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cantorna M. T., Zhu Y., Froicu M. & Wittke A. Vitamin D status, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and the immune system. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 80, 1717S–1720S (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mora J. R., Iwata M. & von Andrian U. H. Vitamin effects on the immune system: vitamins A and D take centre stage. Nat Rev Immunol 8, 685–698, doi: http://www.nature.com/nri/journal/v8/n9/suppinfo/nri2378_S1.html (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1
srep33166-s1.csv (17.8KB, csv)
Supplementary File 2
srep33166-s2.csv (389B, csv)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES