Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Sep 14;6:33452. doi: 10.1038/srep33452

Identification of Viruses in Cases of Pediatric Acute Encephalitis and Encephalopathy Using Next-Generation Sequencing

Jun-ichi Kawada 1, Yusuke Okuno 1, Yuka Torii 1, Ryo Okada 2, Satoshi Hayano 1, Shotaro Ando 1, Yasuko Kamiya 1, Seiji Kojima 1, Yoshinori Ito 1,a
PMCID: PMC5022051  PMID: 27625312

Abstract

Acute encephalitis/encephalopathy is a severe neurological syndrome that is occasionally associated with viral infection. Comprehensive virus detection assays are desirable because viral pathogens have not been identified in many cases. We evaluated the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detecting viruses in clinical samples of encephalitis/encephalopathy patients. We first determined the sensitivity and quantitative performance of NGS by comparing the NGS-determined number of sequences of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) in clinical serum samples with the HHV-6 load measured using real-time PCR. HHV-6 was measured as it occasionally causes neurologic disorders in children. The sensitivity of NGS for detection of HHV-6 sequences was equivalent to that of real-time PCR, and the number of HHV-6 reads was significantly correlated with HHV-6 load. Next, we investigated the ability of NGS to detect viral sequences in 18 pediatric patients with acute encephalitis/encephalopathy of unknown etiology. A large number of Coxsackievirus A9 and mumps viral sequences were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of 2 and 1 patients, respectively. In addition, Torque teno virus and Pepper mild mottle viral sequences were detected in the sera of one patient each. These data indicate that NGS is useful for detection of causative viruses in patients with pediatric encephalitis/encephalopathy.

Acute encephalitis and encephalopathy are characterized by an altered level of consciousness or status epilepticus convulsions within a few days of developing a high-grade fever and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with evidence of intracerebral inflammation are diagnosed with encephalitis, but distinguishing encephalitis from encephalopathy is sometimes difficult in the clinical setting. The most commonly demonstrated pathogenic mechanism of acute encephalitis/encephalopathy is infection, and viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), influenza virus, and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) are important known etiologic agents in pediatric patients1,2. To identify the viral pathogen of encephalitis/encephalopathy, PCR and viral antigen detection kits have been used for some specific viruses. On the other hand, the pathogens of acute encephalitis/encephalopathy have not been identified in a large proportion of cases because detection assays have not been established or are not commonly available for many viruses. For example, the Californian Encephalitis Project, which included 1570 patients, failed to identify cases of encephalitis in 63% of patients1. However, identification of causative agents is important for the correct diagnosis and may be necessary for selection of a specific treatment.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers the prospect of relatively unbiased testing for all previously catalogued and sequenced viruses in a single test. Where conventional viral detection assays, such as serology, virus isolation, and PCR focus on a defined set of candidate viruses, NGS provides an unbiased survey of DNA or RNA sequences present in a sample. Recently, NGS has been applied for detection of viruses and discovery of novel viruses in clinical samples3,4. Although identification of the viral pathogen in encephalitis/encephalopathy patients has been challenging, several studies have shown that NGS is useful for identification of viral pathogens by detecting virus-driven DNA or RNA sequences present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or brain tissue5,6. In this study, we investigated CSF and serum samples from pediatric acute encephalitis/encephalopathy patients using NGS.

Results

Identification of viral sequences in clinical samples using NGS

To validate the NGS-based approach to detect virus-derived sequences in clinical samples, serum or CSF samples obtained from patients with a defined diagnosis of viral infection were examined. Representative results of patients with adenovirus fulminant hepatitis (serum), HSV encephalitis (CSF), and HCV (serum) are shown in Fig. 1. The patient with adenovirus fulminant hepatitis was a 12-year-old female with acute myeloid leukemia who had received a bone marrow transplantation. She developed hepatitis on day 103 after transplantation, and died of hepatic failure on day 113. The details of this case were reported previously7. The patient with HSV encephalitis was a 12-day-old male newborn who presented with fever and seizure. He was diagnosed with neonatal HSV encephalitis by real-time PCR of CSF. The patient with HCV infection was a 14-year-old male who was infected by perinatal transmission. His liver function tests have been normal, but high HCV load was detected.

Figure 1. Identification of viral sequences in clinical samples using next-generation sequencing.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Pie charts show classification of reads from each library into human, unknown categories (no hit), bacteria and viruses. Total reads were mapped against the reference genomes using the CLC Genomics Workbench. Light gray, gray, and very light gray colors in the viral genome alignments represent minimal, average, and maximal coverage in the aggregated 100 bp (human adenovirus and hepatitis C virus) or 1 kbp (human herpesvirus 2) region, respectively. (a) Sequencing results of the DNA library prepared from the serum of a patient with adenovirus fulminant hepatitis. Sequencing reads were mapped to the reference genome of human adenovirus 2. (b) Sequencing results of the DNA library prepared from cerebrospinal fluid of a patient with neonatal herpes encephalitis. Sequencing reads were mapped to the reference genome of human herpesvirus 2. (c) Sequencing results of the RNA library prepared from the serum of a patient with hepatitis C virus infection. Sequencing reads were mapped to the reference genome of Hepatitis C virus genotype 1b.

With DNA sequencing, human sequences were the most abundant, and the vast majority of detected viral sequences corresponded to a single predominant virus, as expected (Fig. 1a,b). Nearly complete adenoviral genomes were detected with high coverage, and sequencing results of the hexon gene indicated that the detected adenovirus was classified into type 2, which was consistent with the results of virus isolation (data not shown). On the other hand, with sequencing of RNA in the serum of the HCV patient, HCV sequences represented 2.1% of total reads (Fig. 1c). Sequencing results of the NS5B region indicated that the detected HCV was classified into genotype 1b (data not shown). However, unclassified sequences derived from Illumina adaptor sequences were the most abundant due to the low amount of input RNA for library preparation and subsequent preferential formation of adaptor dimers. Prior filtering of such non-essential artifacts decreases the heavy computational burden of BLAST search. Importantly, all RNA libraries contained sequences mapping to avian retroviral reference genomes such as avian myeloblastosis-associated virus type 1 and Rous sarcoma virus with high coverage (data not shown). However, they were likely derived from residual avian retroviral genomic material in the ScriptSeq reverse transcriptase enzyme (Illumina, San Diego, CA)8. For the viral metagenomics analysis using NGS, it has been shown that the ScriptSeq library preparation method retrieved more virus reads than TruSeq RNA Kit v2 (Illumina), but avian retroviral sequences were detected only in the libraries prepared with ScriptSeq kit9.

Correlation between results from NGS and real-time PCR

First, we assessed the sensitivity of NGS for detection of viral sequences using sera spiked with HHV-6. Cell-free HHV-6 fluid was prepared by collecting supernatants from HHV-6 infected cord blood mononuclear cells. As shown in Fig. 2a, NGS was able to detect 44 and 2 reads of HHV-6 sequences in serum with 100 and 10 copies/ml of HHV-6, respectively. Considering that detection limit of real-time PCR for HHV-6 is around 50 copies/ml, the sensitivity of the NGS-based approach for detection of HHV-6 was equivalent to that of real-time PCR. To confirm the quantitative performance of NGS, the number of HHV-6 sequences detected in sera of patients was compared with the HHV-6 load measured using real-time PCR. The number of HHV-6 sequences per sample was set to per 5,000,000 total reads because the sensitivity of NGS is dependent on sequencing depth. As shown in Fig. 2b, the number of HHV-6 reads was significantly correlated with HHV-6 load (r = 0.90, p < 0.01). These results suggest that the sensitivity and quantitative performance of the NGS-based approach for detection of DNA viral sequences was equivalent to that of real-time PCR in cell-free clinical samples with a sequencing depth of 5,000,000 reads.

Figure 2. Correlation between the results of next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) DNA libraries were prepared from sera spiked with different loads of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), and sequencing reads were mapped to the reference genome. Gray and very light gray colors in the viral genome alignments represent average and maximal coverage in aggregated 1 kbp region. The number of HHV-6 reads is indicated in the upper right of each coverage plot. Total sequencing reads of sera spiked with 1000, 100, and 10 copies/ml HHV-6 are 15514298, 14904684, and 16868138 reads, respectively. (b) The number of HHV-6 reads detected by next-generation sequencing in sera was compared with the HHV-6 viral load that was measured with real-time PCR. Open circles indicate sera from patients with HHV-6 infection, and closed circles indicate sera spiked with HHV-6, as shown in Fig. 2a. The number of HHV-6 reads per sample is shown per 5,000,000 total reads. Correlations were determined using regression analysis. Dotted line, detection limit of real-time PCR.

Detection of viral sequences in clinical samples of acute encephalitis/encephalopathy

Next, we investigated the CSF and serum samples of patients with acute encephalitis/encephalopathy of unknown etiology. A summary of the patients and the viruses that were detected is shown in Table 1. In some CSF samples, DNA sequencing could not be performed because the concentration of the extracted DNA was not sufficient to prepare DNA libraries. Sequences that mapped to a specific viral genome (except avian retroviruses) with more than 10 reads were detected in three of 16 CSF samples and in two of 15 serum samples (Table 1). Substantial reads of Coxsackievirus A9 sequences were detected in the CSF of patients 1 and 12 (Fig. 3a,c). These sequences aligned with other enteroviral genomes such as Coxsackievirus B3 and Echovirus E30, whereas alignment with the VP1 region suggested that they were derived from Coxsackievirus A9 in both patients (data not shown). Furthermore, mumps viral sequences were detected in the CSF sample from patient 9, and these sequences covered the reference mumps genome (Fig. 3b). Alignment with the SH genomic region indicated that the detected mumps virus was genotype G and not a vaccine strain (data not shown). On the other hand, 13 reads of the Torque teno virus (TTV) and 298 reads of the Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) were detected in the serum of patients 2 and 14, respectively. These virus-derived sequences were not detected in CSF. We confirmed that PPMoV-derived sequences covered the reference genome (Fig. 3d). The presence of Coxsackievirus A9 and mumps virus RNA in the CSF, and PMMoV RNA in the serum was confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 4).

Table 1. Summary of patients and virus detection with next-generation sequencing.

Patient no. Age/Sex Fever/Convulsions Abnormality in brain imaging Day specimens were obtained* CSF cell count (/μl) Virus detection (reads)/total reads
CSF
 Serum
DNA sequencing RNA sequencing DNA sequencing RNA sequencing
1 3 m/M yes/no no 0 379 ND Coxsackievirus A9 (2,783)/2,808,998 NA NA
2 4 m/F no/no yes 1 65 none/8,083,731 none/4,042,588 TTV (13)/10,869,222 none/12,825,812
3 6 m/F no/yes yes 2 2 ND none†/9,631,224 none/14,029,721 none/13,057,234
4 1 y/F yes/yes yes 0 2 ND none†/6,126,780 none/7,511,583 none/6,503,784
5 1 y/F yes/yes no 1 42 ND none†/9,409,404 none/8,761,917 none/9,382,070
6 1 y/F yes/yes no 2 2 NA NA none/5,534,632 none/9,901,028
7 2 y/F yes/yes no 0 175 none/7,986,561 none/3,729,914 NA NA
8 2 y/M yes/yes yes 1 1 ND none†/10,469,992 none/8,551,602 none/16,207,392
9 3 y/M yes/no no 0 151 ND Mumps virus (1,598)/6,342,942 ND none/9,858894
10 3 y/M yes/yes no 1 3 ND none†/9,903,654 none/10,173,039 none/7,157,566
11 4 y/M yes/yes yes 1 2 NA NA none/6,160,773 none/8,588,056
12 7 y/M yes/no no 2 25 ND Coxsackievirus A9 (316)/5,017,612 NA NA
13 8 y/M yes/yes yes 0 2 ND none†/10,693,530 none/5,161,481 none/8,437,476
14 10 y/F yes/yes no 2 1 ND none†/21,903,050 none/6,165,412 Pepper mild mottle virus (298)/10,001,178
15 12 y/F yes/yes no 2 1 ND none†/5,319,1116 none/2,790,344 none/9,769,956
16 13 y/M yes/no yes 2 1044 none/11,177,479 none/4,416,258 none/9,583,470 none/9,092,904
17 14 y/M yes/yes yes 1 162 none/4,037,654 none/2,229,247 none/26,686,548 none/6,830,980
18 15 y/M yes/no no 1 2 ND none†/7,971,760 none/6,818,809 none/9,851,214
Open in a new tab

Metagenome analysis for virus identification was performed using the MePIC pipeline. The number of reads mapping to viral sequences was analyzed with the CLC workbench.

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ND, not done; NA, samples not available; TTV, Torque teno virus; *, days after onset of illness; †, RNA was extracted using carrier RNA.

Figure 3. Coverage plot of viral genomes.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Sequencing reads detected in each patient were mapped to the reference genome of Coxsackievirus A9 (a,c), mumps (b), and Pepper mild mottle virus (d). Light gray, gray, and very light gray colors in the viral genome alignments represent minimal, average, and maximal coverage in aggregated 100 bp region, respectively.

Figure 4. Amplification of virus RNA from clinical samples.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Coxsackievirus A9 and mumps virus were PCR amplified in cerebrospinal fluid of patients 1 and 12, and in patient 9, respectively. Pepper mild mottle virus was PCR amplified in the serum of patient 14. Expected product size of each PCR is shown.

In addition to viral sequences, a significant number of sequences derived from environmental bacteria such as Acinetobacteria and Proteobacteria were detected in all CSF and serum samples (data not shown). However, sequences of bacteria that have been recognized as causes of encephalitis, such as Listeria or Coxiella burnetii, were not detected.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the utility of NGS for detecting viral sequences in CSF and serum and investigated the causative virus in 18 pediatric patients with acute encephalitis/encephalopathy. Sequences mapping to the Coxsackievirus A9 virus and the mumps viral genome were found in CSF, and these viruses were considered to be the causative viral pathogen of encephalitis/encephalopathy. Non-polio enteroviruses are a major cause of encephalitis in children, and Coxsackievirus A9 virus is one of the most frequent serotypes associated with encephalitis10. On the other hand, mumps is one of the most frequent causes of confirmed viral encephalitis in the pre-vaccine era. In Japan, outbreaks of mumps are not uncommon because universal vaccination against mumps has not been introduced. However, the patient with suspected mumps encephalitis in this study had received one dose of the mumps vaccine at the age of 1 year. Sequences detected in the CSF aligned with the wild-type mumps genome rather than vaccine strains, suggesting primary or secondary vaccine failure in this patient. These results suggest that the NGS-based approach for detection of virus-derived sequences in CSF may be a useful and reliable method for identification of the viral pathogen of encephalitis/encephalopathy.

On the other hand, no significant viral reads were detected in 13 of the 16 CSF samples. In general, free RNA from sera or CSF is degraded and obtained in low yield11,12. Extraction of RNA from CSF without pleocytosis was performed with carrier RNA to yield sufficient RNA for library preparation. However, no virus pathogens were detected in these CSF samples, suggesting that RNA sequencing of CSF specimens with very low RNA concentrations may not be very useful. Because of low RNA yield in CSF, the detection of virus-specific RNA has lower sensitivity for diagnosis than other methods. For example, virus RNA detection using RT-PCR in CSF of patients with West Nile virus encephalitis is less sensitive than detection of virus specific IgM antibody in CSF13. It is possible that some of the virus-specific IgM in CSF is more stable than virus RNA. Furthermore, we were unable to perform DNA sequencing in CSF samples without pleocytosis because DNA yields were not sufficient for DNA library preparation. However, it has been shown that RNA sequencing can be used to detect mRNA reads derived from DNA viruses9.

In addition to CSF, we investigated the sera from patients with encephalitis/encephalopathy because some viral pathogens such as HHV-6 are sometimes detected in sera but not in CSF14. Some cases of virus-associated encephalopathy may be a consequence of a systemic immune response rather than a result of direct viral invasion of the central nervous system15,16. Interestingly, sequences mapping to PMMoV were detected in the serum of one patient. PMMoV is a plant RNA virus of the genus Tobamovirus. Recently, metagenomics studies have identified PMMoV in the stool of healthy subjects17. Furthermore, the presence of PMMoV in stool is associated with seropositivity for PMMoV-IgM antibodies and clinical symptoms such as fever and abdominal pain17. On the other hand, detection of PMMoV in human peripheral blood has not been reported. Further investigations are required to clarify whether PMMoV is associated with human disease or is just an innocent bystander. A small number of TTV sequences were detected in the serum of another patient. TTV infections are frequent in humans, but a direct association between TTV and specific diseases has not been established because TTV is sometimes detected in apparently healthy individuals18.

As with previous studies of NGS-based pathogen analysis, a significant number of sequences derived from different types of bacteria such as Acinetobacteria and Proteobacteria were detected in all CSF and serum samples (data not shown)19,20. Although cultures of blood and CSF for bacteria were negative in all patients, some of these bacteria may have been causative agents of encephalitis/encephalopathy. Another possibility is that sequences of normal bacterial flora in humans may be persistently detected in the sera or CSF from patients without bacteremia or meningitis. However, significant levels of bacterial reads, which likely arise from environmental sources, are detected in DNA and RNA sequencing libraries prepared from clinical specimens or tissue culture cells19. For that reason, bacterial contamination is a relevant issue that needs to be extensively addressed before widespread use of NGS-based pathogen detection can be implemented. Distinguishing microbes of interest from contaminants, particularly bacteria, remains difficult.

In conclusion, we have shown that NGS is useful for detection of causative viruses in patients with pediatric encephalitis/encephalopathy. Although routine use of NGS may be difficult because it is costly and labor intense, an unbiased and highly sensitive NGS-based approach has great potential for analysis of pathogens present in clinical samples, and will likely contribute in clinical and public health settings.

Methods

Ethics Statement

The study design and methods were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nagoya University Hospital (IRB number:5069). The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their guardians.

Patients and samples

A total of 18 patients with pediatric acute encephalitis/encephalopathy of unknown etiology were enrolled in this study (Table 1). Acute encephalopathy/encephalitis was defined as occurring in patients with a depressed or altered level of consciousness lasting more than 24 hours and one or more of the following: fever (>38 °C) during the presenting illness; seizure(s) and/or focal neurological findings; CSF pleocytosis; abnormal results of an electroencephalogram; abnormal results of neuroimaging1. Cultures of blood and CSF for bacteria, rapid influenza test, and PCR for HSV, HHV-6, and HHV-7 were negative in all patients. RT-PCR for enterovirus was not performed at enrollment. Serum and CSF samples were obtained in the acute phase (within 2 days of the onset of neurologic involvement) and stored at −30 °C until use. Clinical samples obtained from patients with a defined diagnosis of viral infection such as adenovirus hepatitis, HSV encephalitis, hepatitis C virus (HCV), or HHV-6 encephalopathy were used to validate the NGS-based approach to detect virus-derived sequences. Real-time PCR of HHV-6 was performed with a QuantiTect multiplex PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described previously21, and primers and probes are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Primers and probe used for virus detection.

Virus (methods) Primer/Probe Sequence* Position
Human herpesvirus 6 (real-time PCR) Forward TTTGCAGTCATCACGATCGG 46661−46680
Reverse AGAGCGACAAATTGGAGGTTTC 46862−46883
Probe Cy5-AGCCACAGCAGCCATCTACATCTGTCAA-BHQ3a 46753−46780
Coxsackievirus A9 (RT-nested PCR) Forward-outer GTTGAGACAGGACAYACGTC 2526–2545
Reverse-outer CTRATRAATGGGATTGACATGC 2986–2965
Forward-inner GAYACYATGCAGACYAGGCACGT 2562–2584
Reverse-inner GYGCGTTYCCCTCTGTCCA 2958–2940
Mumps virus (RT-nested PCR) Forward-outer GCRACYAAAGARATCAGRAGRATC 6076–6099
Reverse-outer AGCCTTGATCATTGATCATCC 6803–6783
Forward-inner TCAAGYAGTGTCGAYGATCTC 6130–6150
Reverse-inner TGTCAGCCGCATTGATAACAGG 6689–6668
Pepper mild mottle virus (RT-PCR) Forward ACATTTGGACGACGCTGT 4778–4805
Reverse CGAGTTCTGCCCAATTCTAAC 5649–5629
Open in a new tab

*Sequences are shown 5′ to 3′ with standard codes (Y = C/T, R = A/G).

Library preparation and sequencing

Samples were filtered through a 0.45-μm filter (Merck-Millipore, Temecula, CA) to remove blood cells and bacteria, and extraction of total nucleic acids was performed with a QIAamp UCP Pathogen Mini kit (Qiagen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Extraction of RNA from CSF without pleocytosis was performed with a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen) with carrier RNA to yield sufficient RNA for library preparation. Concentrations of extracted DNA and RNA were measured using a Qubit assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Walthman, MA). Concentrations of DNA from sera and CSF with pleocytosis ranged from 0.1 to 8.2 ng/μl (median, 0.5 ng/μl). On the other hand, concentrations of DNA from CSF without pleocytosis, and RNA extracted without carrier RNA were below the detection limit (<0.01 ng/μl). We could not assess the quality of RNA because the amount of extracted RNA was very low. Before preparation of the RNA sequencing library, extracted nucleic acids were treated with Turbo DNase (Ambion, Darmstad, Germany) for 30 min at 37 °C to digest host DNA. DNA and RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using a Nextera XT DNA Sample preparation kit (Illumina) and ScriptSeq v2 (Illumina), respectively. Library quality was determined using an Agilent 2200 TapeStation (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Fragment sizes and concentrations of libraries ranged from 180 to 511 bp (median, 200 bp) and from 0.7 to 22.0 nM (median, 1.6 nM), respectively. Indexed samples were pooled and sequenced on MiSeq (Illumina) with 2 × 75 bp or HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) with the 2 × 150 bp pair-end protocol to obtain an average of 8,674,293 reads. Obtained short reads are deposited in the DNA Data bank of Japan (Accession number: DRA004741).

Data processing

For identification of virus-derived sequences from NGS data, the cloud-computing pipeline, MePIC v2.0 (National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan) was used as follows22. Raw sequencing reads were processed by removing adaptors and low-quality sequences, followed by subtraction of human reads. For the remaining reads, the MEGABLAST program was used to search sequences for known nucleotide sequences in the database including viruses. To summarize the taxonomic information, the metagenome analyzer, MEGAN5 (University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany), was used23. Alignment with each viral reference genome was analyzed by CLC workbench (CLC bio; Qiagen). To avoid making calls based on potentially spurious alignments, detection of more than 10 reads of sequences mapping to the viral reference genome was considered to indicate the presence of the virus in this study.

RT-PCR

RT-nested PCR of Coxsackievirus A9 and mumps virus as well as RT-PCR of PMMoV were performed as described previously with the modified primers shown in Table 2 24,25. One-step RT-PCR and second PCR was carried out using AccessQuick RT-PCR (Promega, Madison, WI) and Takara Ex Taq (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Japan), respectively.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kawada, J. et al. Identification of Viruses in Cases of Pediatric Acute Encephalitis and Encephalopathy Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Sci. Rep. 6, 33452; doi: 10.1038/srep33452 (2016).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the flowing pediatricians for providing specimens and clinical information: S. Ohgaya (Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital), Y. Kawano (Okazaki City Hospital), M. Tanaka (Kasugai Municipal Hospital) and S. Hara (TOYOTA Memorial Hospital).

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.K., Y.O., S.K. and Y.I. conceived and designed the experiments. J.K., Y.O., Y.T., R.O., S.A. and Y.K. performed the experiments. J.K., Y.O. and S.H. analyzed and interpreted the data. J.K. and Y.I. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Glaser C. A. et al. Beyond viruses: clinical profiles and etiologies associated with encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis 43, 1565–1577 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoshino A. et al. Epidemiology of acute encephalopathy in Japan, with emphasis on the association of viruses and syndromes. Brain Dev 34, 337–343 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yozwiak N. L. et al. Virus identification in unknown tropical febrile illness cases using deep sequencing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6, e1485 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Prachayangprecha S. et al. Exploring the potential of next-generation sequencing in detection of respiratory viruses. J Clin Microbiol 52, 3722–3730 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin L. A. et al. Human parvovirus 4 as potential cause of encephalitis in children, India. Emerg Infect Dis 17, 1484–1487 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan B. K., Wilson T., Fischer K. F. & Kriesel J. D. Deep sequencing to identify the causes of viral encephalitis. PloS One 9, e93993 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kawashima N. et al. Fulminant adenovirus hepatitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplant: Retrospective real-time PCR analysis for adenovirus DNA in two cases. J Infect Chemother 21, 857–863 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vinner L. et al. Investigation of Human Cancers for Retrovirus by Low-Stringency Target Enrichment and High-Throughput Sequencing. Sci Rep 5, 13201 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li L. et al. Comparing viral metagenomics methods using a highly multiplexed human viral pathogens reagent. J Virol Methods 213, 139–146 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fowlkes A. L. et al. Enterovirus-associated encephalitis in the California encephalitis project, 1998–2005. J Infect Dis 198, 1685–1691 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jose M., Gajardo R. & Jorquera J. I. Stability of HCV, HIV-1 and HBV nucleic acids in plasma samples under long-term storage. Biologicals 33, 9–16 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hasan M. R., Tan R., Al-Rawahi G. N., Thomas E. & Tilley P. Short-term stability of pathogen-specific nucleic acid targets in clinical samples. J Clinical Microbiol 50, 4147–4150 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nash D. et al. The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. N Engl J Med 344, 1807–1814 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kawabe S. et al. Comparison of the levels of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) DNA and cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid and serum of children with HHV-6 encephalopathy. J Med Virol 82, 1410–1415 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kawada J. et al. Systemic cytokine responses in patients with influenza-associated encephalopathy. J Infect Dis 188, 690–698 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kawada J. et al. Analysis of gene-expression profiles by oligonucleotide microarray in children with influenza. J Gen Virol 87, 1677–1683 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Colson P. et al. Pepper mild mottle virus, a plant virus associated with specific immune responses, Fever, abdominal pains, and pruritus in humans. PloS One 5, e10041 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Okamoto H. History of discoveries and pathogenicity of TT viruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 331, 1–20 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Strong M. J. et al. Microbial contamination in next generation sequencing: implications for sequence-based analysis of clinical samples. PLoS Pathogens 10, e1004437 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perlejewski K. et al. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the identification of encephalitis-causing viruses: Unexpected detection of human herpesvirus 1 while searching for RNA pathogens. J Virol Methods 226, 1–6 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wada K. et al. Simultaneous quantification of Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and human herpesvirus 6 DNA in samples from transplant recipients by multiplex real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 45, 1426–1432 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Takeuchi F. et al. MePIC, metagenomic pathogen identification for clinical specimens. Jpn J Infectious Dis 67, 62–65 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huson D. H. & Weber N. Microbial community analysis using MEGAN. Methods Enzymol 531, 465–485 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thoelen I. et al. Molecular typing and epidemiology of enteroviruses identified from an outbreak of aseptic meningitis in Belgium during the summer of 2000. J Med Virol 70, 420–429 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kidokoro M., Tuul R., Komase K. & Nymadawa P. Characterization of mumps viruses circulating in Mongolia: identification of a novel cluster of genotype H. J Clin Microbiol 49, 1917–1925 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES