Abstract
In eukaryotes, P-type ATPases generate the plasma membrane potential and drive secondary transport systems; however, despite their importance, their regulation remains poorly understood. Here we monitored at the single-molecule level the activity of the prototypic proton pumping P-type ATPase Arabidopsis thaliana isoform 2 (AHA2). Our measurements combined with a physical non-equilibrium model of vesicle acidification, revealed that pumping is stochastically interrupted by long-lived (~100 s) inactive or leaky states. Allosteric regulation by pH gradients modulated the switch between these states, but not the pumping or leakage rates. The autoinhibitory regulatory domain of AHA2 reduced the intrinsic pumping rates, but increased the dwell time in the active pumping state. We anticipate that similar functional dynamics underlie the operation and regulation of many other active transporters.
Main text
Electrochemical gradients across cellular membranes control many essential biological processes. These gradients are generated by primary active transporters and are used to drive the exchange of other solutes through secondary active transporters and to facilitate signaling through ion channels (1). Patch clamp recording has made it possible to observe the functional dynamics of single ion channels revealing discrete on and off states, subconductance states, and other mechanistically important features that macroscopic experiments cannot probe (2). However, despite extensive structural and biochemical efforts (3), we currently lack a similar depth of understanding of transporters because they in general do not produce electrically detectable single-molecule transport signals (4–8). Here we monitored at the single-molecule level the functional dynamics of a eukaryotic primary active transporter, Arabidopsis thaliana H+-ATPase isoform 2 (AHA2, referred to as the proton pump), which is responsible for energizing the plasma membrane of plants and fungi (Fig. S1–S2) (3, 9). This provided insights into how the activity of P-type ATPases is modulated by autoregulatory terminal domains (R domains) and pH gradients (10, 11).
We used total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to image with high throughput single nanoscopic lipid vesicles tethered to a solid support (Fig. 1A, 1B, S3, S4). Tethering was accomplished with a biotin/neutravidin protocol (12), which maintains the native function and diffusivity of reconstituted transmembrane proteins (13) and the vesicles’ spherical morphology (14) and low passive ion permeability (15). The fluorescence intensity of all single vesicles was quantitatively converted to pH (Fig. S5) and tracked over periods of up to 30 minutes.
Fig. 1. Imaging proton pumping into the lumen of single surface-tethered vesicles using TIRF microscopy.
A) Illustration of AHA2R reconstituted vesicles tethered to a passivated glass surface and imaged on individual basis with TIRF microscopy. Zoom: extra-vesicular addition of both ATP and Mg2+ activated exclusively outward facing AHA2R molecules triggering H+ pumping in the vesicle lumen. We quantified changes in the vesicular H+ concentration by calibrating the response of the lipid-conjugated pH sensitive fluorophore pHrodo™. Valinomycin was always present to mediate K+/H+ exchange and prevent the build up of a transmembrane electrical potential. B) TIRF image of single vesicles tethered on a passivated glass slide. C) Acidification kinetics of single vesicles upon addition of ATP and Mg2+. Red traces highlight three representative signals from single vesicles showcasing: absence of transport activity, continuous pumping of protons and fluctuations in proton-transport activity. The black trace is the average of 600 single vesicle traces. As expected, addition of the protonophore CCCP collapsed the proton gradient established by AHA2R.
Initial studies were carried out on the well-studied activated form of AHA2, which lacks the flexible C-terminal auto-inhibitory R domain (AHA2R) (Fig. 1A, Fig. S1–S3) (9). Initialization of H+ pumping into the vesicle lumen was triggered by the addition of ATP and Mg2+, which are non-membrane permeable and thus only activate proton pumps with an outward facing ATP binding domain (Fig. 1A) (12). Consistent with this, we never observed lumenal alkalinization (Fig. 1C). Acidification kinetics reached a plateau of well-defined pH (ΔpHmax) as a result of a dynamic steady state in which active pumping (influx) of protons matched the passive leakage (efflux) of protons through the membrane due to the build up of a proton motive force (16). As expected, addition of the protonophore CCCP collapsed the H+ gradients (Fig. 1C), while controls performed without Mg2+, ATP or AHA2R showed no response (Fig. S6D). Furthermore, the activity of the pump was blocked by the addition of the specific inhibitor vanadate (11) and decayed after flushing out ATP and Mg2+ (Fig. S7). To control for potential artifacts arising from the surface-tethering of vesicles, we performed a side-by-side comparison with vesicles suspended in solution, which proved indistinguishable within experimental uncertainties (Fig. 1C, S6). Taken together, these results demonstrate that we are able to observe the AHA2R-mediated and ATP-fuelled pumping of protons against their concentration gradient into the lumen of single vesicles. The single-vesicle experiments revealed a remarkable heterogeneity of acidification rates and ΔpHmax values between vesicles (Fig. 1C) that remain masked in the ensemble averages (16).
At the low protein-to-lipid molar ratio (1:12,000) used in our experiments, 84% of vesicles exhibited no detectable pH changes (Fig. 1C and Fig. 2A top trace) indicating the absence of active pumps and thus suggesting that there are only a few active pumps in each of the remaining vesicles whose pH changed over time (hereafter termed ‘active vesicles’). We inspected the pH changes in the 16% of active vesicles and indeed found that all of them exhibited the hallmark of single molecule behavior, i.e. stochastic changes between discrete states (Fig. 2A). Since the passive leakage rates of the vesicles are constant over time (Fig. S10), these data demonstrate that the individual proton pumps are stochastically transitioning between active and inactive states. This behavior is termed ‘functional dynamics’ (17–24) and is key to the function and regulation of ion channels (25).
Fig. 2. Single-molecule observation of proton pumping reveals active and inactive states.
A) Typical examples of pH changes inside individual AHA2R reconstituted vesicles. ATP and Mg2+ (2 mM) were added to initiate proton pumping and CCCP (5 μM) was added to collapse the pH gradients. Traces show −ΔpH defined as a difference between the initial and final pH. Images of each respective liposome at different time points are shown below each trace. At the right-hand side of the traces we plotted histograms of pH plateaus numbered to indicate the number of active pumps per vesicle. The pH inside the majority of vesicles showed no changes indicating the absence of functional transporter molecules (top panel). For a small fraction of vesicles we observed intermittent H+ pumping indicating the presence of single-molecules (middle panels). The observation of two discrete steady-state pH plateaus in single vesicle traces indicated the occasional presence of two active pumps per single vesicle (bottom panel). B) Population histogram of pH plateaus for AHA2R-reconstituted vesicles (n = 3, where hereafter n is the number of independent experiments). C, D) Same as in A, B but for full length AHA2. For D n = 2. Labeling of AHA2 with Alexa Fluor® 647 enabled counting on the same vesicles of both the number of labeled AHA2 proteins (E), and of the respective activity dynamics (C). F) The histogram of active proteins per vesicle was calculated from step-bleaching analysis of the data in E that was corrected for labeling efficiency and the probability that a proton pump is active (12). The two independent methods for estimating the number of active molecules agreed that ~70% of vesicles containing a protein have one active proton pump.
Further examination of all active vesicle traces revealed that ~60% of them reverted back to the zero ΔpH baseline after switching off, strongly suggesting the presence of only one molecule since it is improbable for many molecules to switch off simultaneously (Fig. 2A). In the remaining traces (~40%) we observed two or three discrete plateaus, a feature that has been observed in all studies of single channels to date and has been interpreted to demonstrate that the activity of multiple single molecules can be discretely resolved. The latter conclusion was further supported by experiments where titration of the protein to lipid ratio modulated the percentage of multiple plateaus (Fig. S5G), excluding the possibility that multiple plateaus represent multiple single-molecule activity states. These observations allowed us to unambiguously identify those traces resulting from a single active proton pump, which we then selected for further analysis. Importantly, the activity of single proton pumps is amplified and reported by ~103 pH-sensitive fluorophores (Fig. S3, S4) (16) circumventing the issue of photobleaching that fundamentally restricts most fluorescence studies of single molecules.
Dynamic transitions between active/inactive states were also observed in experiments with the wild type AHA2 (Fig. 2C), demonstrating that they are not solely a property of the truncated version. Here ~80% of all vesicles were inactive, while ~73% of those that showed activity had a single plateau indicating a single molecule (Fig. 2D). With wild type AHA2 we succeeded in using a SNAP tag to fluorescently label the protein and count directly the number of proteins per vesicle (Fig. 2E). This allowed us to observe activity dynamics and directly count the number of labeled proteins at the same time on the same vesicles (Fig. 2C and 2E). We then estimated the labeling efficiency and the probability that a proton pump was active (12). We were thus able to convert quantitatively the bleach step distribution to a distribution of active molecules per vesicle, and demonstrate that 70 ± 15% of proteoliposomes carried one active molecule (Fig. 2F). This was in quantitative agreement with the distribution of activity plateaus (~73%) (Fig. 2D) providing an additional demonstration that we can resolve and record the functional dynamics of the proton pump at the single molecule level.
The activity of the proton pump, and likely other active transporters, is thus not constant in time (Fig. 2). Therefore, for transporters (just like ion channels), the rates measured in macroscopic experiments are the product of the active state probability and the intrinsic pumping rate. To quantitatively analyze the kinetics and dynamics of pumping, we constructed a physical model of a single vesicle (12) which accounts for several parameters that affect the acidification kinetics, including passive and active ionic fluxes across the membrane, proton buffering in the lumen, vesicle size, and build up of membrane potential (Fig. 3A) (26). Proton pumping is modeled with a fixed rate IP, a lifetime (ton) and time between pumping events (toff), Fig. 3A, B. The vesicle is assumed to have a passive membrane permeability to protons (Pleak) which is constant over time as revealed by control experiments (Fig. S10). The stochastic switching of the pump between active and inactive states was extracted directly from the traces and used as time-dependent input to the model. The model is constrained to fit the entire trace, it provides a realistic description of the full electrochemical gradient and a direct estimation of the absolute numbers of pumped and leaked ions.
Fig. 3. Modeling active, inactive and leaky states, and their role in autoinhibiting proton pumps.
A) Main parameters of the physical model we used to fit changes in the vesicular pH were pumping rate (Ip), protein associated leak (PAHA2), membrane leak (Pleak), valinomycin induced K+ permeability (PK+), buffering capacity in the interior of the vesicle (β), electrical potential across the membrane (Ψ) (12). B) Example of a typical proton pumping trace and respective fits without (blue) and with (red) a transprotein proton leak. A threshold in the first derivative of the pH kinetics (12)was used to define the lifetime of the active state ton and the time between pumping events toff. C) Temporal evolution of the proton pumping rate (grey) and the proton efflux rates due to passive membrane (red) leakage and transprotein back-flow (blue) for the pH trace shown in B. D) Histogram of proton permeability associated with the membrane, AHA2 and AHA2R. Respective counts were 95, 37 and 45. E) Histogram of pumping rates for AHA2R and AHA2. Respective counts were 126 and 95. F) Histogram of ton for AHA2R and AHA2. Respective counts were 241 and 134. The bar at >1200 s shows the number of traces that did not switch in the duration of the experiment. G) Histogram of toff for AHA2R and AHA2. Respective counts were 69 and 39. For AHA2R and AHA2 respectively: the number of independent experiments was 3 and 2, while the number of individual proteoliposomes analyzed was 126 and 95.
Initially, all experimental traces were fit with the model by varying two parameters: IP and Pleak. This provided a good quantitative description of the majority of AHA2R traces (~65% of 126 counts, Fig. S8); however, it systematically underestimated the observed leaking rates for the remaining traces (Fig. 3B, blue line) suggesting the existence of an additional proton leaking route apart from passive leakage through the membrane (Fig. S8). Indeed, leakage of ions through transporters has been reported before e.g. for P-, and V-type ATPases (27, 28). To test this hypothesis, we collected all lifetimes of exponential fits to the leakage kinetics from traces transitioning between active and inactive states. The histogram of leakage lifetimes (Fig. S9C) had two clearly separated peaks: one that according to control experiments corresponded to passive leakage through the membrane (transmembrane leak), and another that was approximately 20-fold faster (Fig. S9, S10). The latter peak was specifically inhibited by addition of the vanadate which locks the pump in the E2 state (11) (Fig. S9D), demonstrating that the leak is not passively mediated by the membrane (or the protein/membrane interface), but the pump itself. Since vanadate is membrane-impermeable we can exclude the possibility that the fast leak component originated from pumps with the opposite orientation, because they would not be blocked by vanadate. We thus modified the model to include a time-dependent transprotein proton leak (PAHA2), which turns on once pumping stops and turns off at the beginning of the next pumping cycle (Fig. 3C, blue dotted line). As expected, the revised model considerably improved the fits of the remaining traces (Fig. 3B red line, and Fig. S8).
Next, we quantitated proton permeabilities by fitting the kinetics with the model. The average transmembrane leak Pleak (Fig. 3D and Fig. S11) was ~7 × 10−5 cm/s, in line with previous measurements and estimates (26), and the average transprotein leak PAHA2 had a similar value (~46 × 10−5 cm/s) (Fig. 3D). However, when normalized for surface-area the transprotein proton current was greater than the transmembrane by a factor of ~104.
The inhibitory R domain of AHA2 has been shown to reduce the net macroscopic proton transport rate by ~2-fold (10, 11). In order to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this regulation, we characterized the activity of the proton pump with and without the R domain. Counter-intuitively, the autoinhibitory R domain increased the total time the transporter spent in the active state, both by increasing ton ~3-fold (from 337 to 951 s, p = 10−19, and by decreasing toff ~0.5-fold (from 121 to 65 s, p = 0.05) (decay constants of exponential fits to the distributions in Fig. 3F, & 3G; unless otherwise stated, p is a Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test of statistical similarity between two distributions). Thus the probability to find the pump in an active state Pon=ton/(ton+toff), increased ~200% for AHA2 (from 0.35 ± 0.05 to 0.76 ± 0.06). Importantly, 100% of AHA2R and ~60% of AHA2 molecules switch on/off during our observation period highlighting that functional dynamics is a dominant property of this system (Fig. 3F). The R domain also had a pronounced effect on the overall intrinsic transport rates of the pump that were reduced by ~10-fold compared to AHA2R (from 928 to 85 protons/s, average values, p = 10−20) (Fig. 3E). In addition, the R domain promoted an overall decrease in the transprotein leak (~1.4-fold, p = 0.005) (Fig. 3D).
The activity of the pump was regulated also by the pH gradients established across the membrane during proton pumping. Increasing ΔpHmax decreased by >2-fold the lifetime of the active state, however only for the wild type (Fig. 4A, B). This regulation seems to be transmitted allosterically across the bilayer since the R domain of AHA2 is facing the vesicle exterior where the pH remains constant. In addition, traces with larger ΔpHmax had a dramatic 8-fold increase (from 0.1 to 0.8) in the probability of a transprotein leak for both forms of AHA2 (Fig. 4C). Thus, regulation by pH gradients can manifest through two mechanistically distinct processes that reduce the net average proton transport, reduction of the pumping lifetime and increase of the probability of a transprotein leak, whereby only the former is encoded in the R domain.
Fig. 4. Regulation of proton pumping by pH gradients.
A, B) Relation between ton and the maximal pH gradient for AHA2R and AHA2, respectively. Each data point represents the average of 3 consecutive values. Error bars represent corresponding standard deviations. The decay constants from the error weighted exponential fits to the data are 6.9 ± 2.0 s and 0.4 ± 0.1 s for (A) and (B), respectively, where uncertainties represent 95% confidence intervals from the fits. C) Probability to observe transprotein leak as a function of pH gradient proton pumping. For AHA2R and AHA2 respectively: data were binned with 0.25 and 0.5 pH units; number of independent experiments and individual proteoliposomes analyzed was the same as in Fig. 3. Spearman’s rank order correlation coefficients ρ (126) = 0.40 P =10−4 and ρ (95) = 0.30 P = 0.03 indicated a strong positive correlation between leakage probability and ΔpHmax for both AHA2R and AHA2.
Our observations of proton transport and leakage dynamics at the single molecule level also provide critical insights to the ATP/H+ stoichiometry (27, 28). Ensemble average experiments have reported that the build up of pH gradients can in general alter the stoichiometry of transport and therefore pumping rates (27, 28). Contrary to expectation however, we found that the intrinsic (single molecule) pumping rate remained constant for gradients as large as 2 pH units (Fig. 3B, 3C, S12C). As discussed above, pH gradients did reduce the net proton transport but primarily by increasing the probability of a downhill transprotein leak (Fig. 4C). Importantly, since the transprotein leak takes place once the pump has switched to the inactive state (Fig. 3C, S9), it does not affect the actual stoichiometry of active transport. In contrast, the R domain reduced the intrinsic pumping rates by ~10-fold (Fig. 4E). Since the R domain that does not significantly affect the ensemble average ATPase activity (10, 29), our measurements suggest the R domain can reduce the stoichiometry of active transport by a factor of ~10 (or 20 if we correct for the change in Pon) (11). We note that our measurements of proton transport integrate over thousands of Post-Albers catalytic cycles per second per single molecule, a better mechanistic understanding of these processes would ultimately require direct measurement of stoichiometry of single turnover cycles or careful molecular simulations.
Here we developed a single-molecule technique to observe in a highly parallel manner uphill substrate transport into single nanoscopic lipid vesicles. Our measurements revealed the existence and the dynamics of several distinct functional states (active, inactive and leaky) that together defined the activity and the regulation of the proton pump, and that we anticipate underlie the operation of many other primary and secondary active transporters. The assays introduced here render these processes accessible to direct experimental observation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (Center of Excellence Biomembranes in Nanomedicine), the Danish Councils for Independent (grant number 1323-00297) and Strategic Research, the Danish National Research Foundation (Center of Excellence PUMPKIN, grant number DNRF85), the University of Copenhagen programs of excellence Single Molecule Nanoscience, BioScaRT, UNIK-Synthetic Biology, and the National Institutes of Health (grant number R21-GM100224). We are grateful to Michael G. Palmgren, Joseph Mindell and Poul Nissen for stimulating discussions and comments on the manuscript; Michael G. Palmgren is thanked for generously providing plasmids, Ulrik Gether for instrumentation and Anne-Mette Bjerg Petersen for excellent technical assistance. D.S. conceived the strategy and was responsible for the overall project supervision. B.H.J. performed cloning. G.C.K., B.H.J., I.L.J. expressed, purified and reconstituted AHA2R and AHA2, and performed macroscopic measurements and data analysis under the supervision of T.G.P.. T.G.P. synthesized and G.C.K purified pHrodo-PE; J.S. performed and analyzed mass spectrometry experiments of pHrodo-PE. S.M.C. wrote software for analyzing time lapse sequences of single vesicles. S.V. designed, performed and analyzed most single vesicle experiments, with help from M.P.M and G.G., under the supervision of S.M.C. and D.S.. C.L., A.L.C. and N.H.S. contributed with preliminary single-vesicle acidification measurements. M.G. contributed the model of vesicle acidification. D.S. wrote the manuscript, S.V., G.G., M.P.M., B.H.J., G.C.K., I.L.J., and T.G.P. helped prepare figures and Supplementary Material (SM). All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Footnotes
Materials and Methods
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Ashcroft F, Gadsby D, Miller C. The blurred boundary between channels and transporters. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2009;364:145–147. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Neher E, Sakmann B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976;260:799–802. doi: 10.1038/260799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morth JP, Pedersen BP, Buch-Pedersen MJ, Andersen JP, Vilsen B, Palmgren MG, et al. A structural overview of the plasma membrane Na+,K+-ATPase and H+-ATPase ion pumps. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:60–70. doi: 10.1038/nrm3031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.DeFelice LJ, Goswami T. Transporters as channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:87–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.164816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peters R. Optical single transporter recording: Transport kinetics in microarrays of membrane patches. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003;32:47–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.142429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tonnesen A, Christensen SM, Tkach V, Stamou D. Geometrical membrane curvature as an allosteric regulator of membrane protein structure and function. Biophys J. 2014;106:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Watanabe R, Soga N, Fujita D, Tabata KV, Yamauchi L, Kim SH, et al. Arrayed lipid bilayer chambers allow single-molecule analysis of membrane transporter activity. Nat Commun. 2014;5 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li M, Jorgensen SK, McMillan DGG, Krzeminski L, Daskalakis NN, Partanen RH, et al. Single Enzyme Experiments Reveal a Long-Lifetime Proton Leak State in a Heme-Copper Oxidase. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:16055–16063. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pedersen BP, Buch-Pedersen MJ, Morth JP, Palmgren MG, Nissen P. Crystal structure of the plasma membrane proton pump. Nature. 2007;450:1111–1114. doi: 10.1038/nature06417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Palmgren MG, Larsson C, Sommarin M. Proteolytic activation of the plant plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase by removal of a terminal segment. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:13423–13426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Palmgren MG, Nissen P. P-Type ATPases. Ann Rev Biophys. 2011;40:243–266. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.See materials and methods and supplementary information on Science Online
- 13.Mathiasen S, Christensen SM, Fung JJ, Rasmussen SGF, Fay JF, Jorgensen SK, et al. Nanoscale high-content analysis using compositional heterogeneities of single proteoliposomes. Nat Methods. 2014;11:931–934. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bendix PM, Pedersen MS, Stamou D. Quantification of nano-scale intermembrane contact areas by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:12341–12346. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903052106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stamou D, Duschl C, Delamarche E, Vogel H. Self-assembled microarrays of attoliter molecular vessels. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2003;42:5580–5583. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kemmer GC, Bogh SA, Urban M, Palmgren MG, Vosch T, Schiller J, et al. Lipid-conjugated fluorescent pH sensors for monitoring pH changes in reconstituted membrane systems. Analyst. 2015;140:6313–6320. doi: 10.1039/c5an01180a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iversen L, Tu HL, Lin WC, Christensen SM, Abel SM, Iwig J, et al. Ras activation by SOS: Allosteric regulation by altered fluctuation dynamics. Science. 2014;345:50–54. doi: 10.1126/science.1250373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Comstock MJ, Whitley KD, Jia HF, Sokoloski J, Lohman TM, Ha T, et al. Direct observation of structure-function relationship in a nucleic acid-processing enzyme. Science. 2015;348:352–354. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yanagida T, Ishii Y, editors. Single Molecule Dynamics in Life Science. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xie XS. In: Single Molecule Spectroscopy in Chemistry, Physics and Biology. Graslund A, Rigler R, Widengren J, editors. Vol. 96. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Heidelberger Platz 3, D-14197 Berlin, Germany: 2010. pp. 435–448. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Akyuz N, Georgieva ER, Zhou Z, Stolzenberg S, Cuendet MA, Khelashvili G, et al. Transport domain unlocking sets the uptake rate of an aspartate transporter. Nature. 2015;518:68. doi: 10.1038/nature14158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aitken CE, Puglisi JD. Following the intersubunit conformation of the ribosome during translation in real time. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:793–U735. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li GW, Oh E, Weissman JS. The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria. Nature. 2012;484:538–U172. doi: 10.1038/nature10965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Subramaniam AR, Zid BM, O’Shea EK. An Integrated Approach Reveals Regulatory Controls on Bacterial Translation Elongation. Cell. 2014;159:1200–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sakmann B, Neher E, editors. Single-channel Recording. 2. Springer; New York, NY: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grabe M, Oster G. Regulation of organelle acidity. J Gen Physiol. 2001;117:329–344. doi: 10.1085/jgp.117.4.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Berman MC. Slippage and uncoupling in P-type cation pumps; implications for energy transduction mechanisms and regulation of metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1513:95–121. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(01)00356-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nelson N, Sacher A, Nelson H. The significance of molecular slips in transport systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:876–881. doi: 10.1038/nrm955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Palmgren MG, Sommarin M, Serrano R, Larsson C. Identification of an autoinhibitory domain in the C-terminal region of the plant plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:20470–20475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lanfermeijer FC, Venema K, Palmgren MG. Purification of a histidine-tagged plant plasma membrane H+-ATPase expressed in yeast. Protein Expression Purif. 1998;12:29–37. doi: 10.1006/prep.1997.0788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hill JE, Myers AM, Koerner TJ, Tzagoloff A. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast. 1986;2:163–167. doi: 10.1002/yea.320020304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cid A, Perona R, Serrano R. Replacement of the promoter of the yeast plasma membrane ATPase gene by a galactose-dependent promoter and its physiological consequences. Curr Genet. 1987;12:105–110. doi: 10.1007/BF00434664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Regenberg B, Villalba JM, Lanfermeijer FC, Palmgren MG. C-terminal deletion analysis of plant plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase: yeast as a model system for solute transport across the plant plasma membrane. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1655–1666. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.10.1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liang W, Levchenko T, Khaw BA, Torchilin V. ATP-containing immunoliposomes specific for cardiac myosin. Curr Drug Deliv. 2004;1:1–7. doi: 10.2174/1567201043480063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ekberg K, Palmgren MG, Veierskov B, Buch-Pedersen MJ. A Novel Mechanism of P-type ATPase Autoinhibition Involving Both Termini of the Protein. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:7344–7350. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.096123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ekberg K, Wielandt AG, Buch-Pedersen MJ, Palmgren MG. A Conserved Asparagine in a P-type Proton Pump Is Required for Efficient Gating of Protons. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:9610–9618. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.417345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Justesen BH, Hansen RW, Martens HJ, Theorin L, Palmgren MG, Martinez KL, et al. Active Plasma Membrane P-type H+-ATPase Reconstituted into Nanodiscs Is a Monomer. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:26419–26429. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.446948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Buch-Pedersen MJ, Palmgren MG. Conserved Asp684 in transmembrane segment M6 of the plant plasma membrane P-type proton pump AHA2 is a molecular determinant of proton translocation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:17845–17851. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212729200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stratton M, Lee IH, Bhattacharyya M, Christensen SM, Chao LH, Schulman H, et al. Activation-triggered subunit exchange between CaMKII holoenzymes facilitates the spread of kinase activity. Elife. 2014;3:e01610. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kunding AH, Mortensen MW, Christensen SM, Stamou D. A fluorescence-based technique to construct size distributions from single-object measurements: application to the extrusion of lipid vesicles. Biophys J. 2008;95:1176–1188. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.128819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ensign DL, Pande VS. Bayesian single-exponential kinetics in single-molecule experiments and simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:12410–12423. doi: 10.1021/jp903107c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ishida Y, Nayak S, Mindell JA, Grabe M. A model of lysosomal pH regulation. J Gen Physiol. 2013;141:705–720. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201210930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rybak SL, Lanni F, Murphy RF. Theoretical considerations on the role of membrane potential in the regulation of endosomal pH. Biophys J. 1997;73:674–687. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78102-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Boron WF. Regulation of intracellular pH. Adv Physiol Educ. 2004;28:160–179. doi: 10.1152/advan.00045.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gramlich G, Zhang J, Winterhalter M, Nau WM. A long-lived amphiphilic fluorescent probe studied in POPC air-water monolayer and solution bilayer systems. Chem Phys Lipids. 2001;113:1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-3084(01)00133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tahara Y, Fujiyoshi Y. A new method to measure bilayer thickness: cryo-electron microscopy of frozen hydrated liposomes and image simulation. Micron. 1994;25:141–149. doi: 10.1016/0968-4328(94)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ghale G, Lanctot AG, Kreissl HT, Jacob MH, Weingart H, Winterhalter M, et al. Chemosensing ensembles for monitoring biomembrane transport in real time. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:2762–2765. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




