Abstract
Single-domain structure with orthorhombic symmetry has been achieved in morphotropic phase boundary composition 0.24Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3 −0.43Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.33PbTiO3 ternary single crystal by applying a large field along the pseudo-cubic direction [011]c. Complete set of elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric constants has been determined with self-consistency. This crystal shows very large thickness shear piezoelectric coefficient d15=4324 pC/N and extremely high shear electromechanical coupling factor k15=96%. Three-dimensional orientation dependence of the longitudinal piezoelectric constant d33 was calculated and compared with experimental values, which revealed nearly 20% extrinsic contributions in domain engineered [001]c and [111]c poled conditions.
Keywords: Ferroelectrics, Piezoelectric materials, PIN-PMN-PT, Orthorhombic
1. Introduction
[001]c poled relaxor-PT single crystals with both rhombohedral and morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) compositions, show excellent longitudinal piezoelectric and electromechanical coupling properties, such as d33=2000 pC/N and k33=92% for [001]c poled PMN–0.30 PT (R phase), and d33=2820 pC/N and k33 = 94% for [001]c poled PMN–0.33 PT (MPB composition) single crystals [1,2]. While for [011]c poling, the macroscopic properties of rhombohedral composition with “2 R” domain structure are significantly different from those of MPB compositions with “1 O” domain structure [3-5]. Especially the longitudinal/transverse piezoelectric properties (d33=340 pC/N, d32= 260 pC/N) of [011]c poled MPB composition crystals were much lower than that of [011]c poled rhombohedral crystals (d33=1300 pC/N, d32= −1680 pC/N) [4].
Recently, the coexistence of MA and MC phases in as-grown PMN–0.32 PT single crystals were observed at room temperature by polarized optical microscopy [6]. From X-ray diffraction experiments, Singh et al. reported that the structure is tetragonal (T) phase for PMN-xPT with x≥0.35, and R phase for PMN-xPT with x≤0.26. In the MPB regions, monoclinic MA is stable for 0.27≤x≤0.30, while monoclinic MC is stable for 0.31≤x≤0.34 [7]. The monoclinic phase (MC) and orthorhombic phase (O) were induced by electric field E//[001]c and E//[011]c for PMN-0.35 PT single crystal, respectively [8].
While after being poled along [011]c, the MPB composition crystal approximately shows macroscopic orthorhombic mm2 point group symmetry since the monoclinic MC phase is practically a slightly distorted orthorhombic O phase [5,9]. In this work, we report a complete set of elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric constants of [011]c poled 0.24Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–0.43Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.33PbTiO3 (0.24PIN–0.43PMN–0.33 PT) ternary single crystal. The poled 0.24PIN–0.43PMN–0.33 PT crystal shows macroscopically orthorhombic mm2 pseudo-single-domain properties. In addition, the three-dimensional orientation dependence of the longitudinal piezoelectric constant d33 has been calculated for 0.24PIN–0.43PMN-0.33 PT based on the measured full matrix single domain data, and compared with the measured d33 under [001]c and [111]c poling conditions.
2. Experimental
The 0.24PIN-0.43PMN-0.33 PT single crystals used in this work were grown by the modified Bridgman method [10,11]. The as-grown crystal was oriented by the Laue machine with an accuracy of ±0.5°. Specimens used in the full matrix measurements were cut and polished into parallelepiped with three pairs of parallel surfaces along , [100]c, and [011]c. Moreover, the [001]c, [111]c, and [011]c oriented plates were prepared for the piezoelectric property measurements. The samples were sputtered with gold electrodes on the [001]c, [111]c, or [011]c pair surfaces, respectively, and poled at 15 kV/cm in silicone oil at room temperature. The piezoelectric constant d33 of [001]c, [111]c, and [011]c oriented plates were measured by using a ZJ-2 piezo d33 meter. The combined resonance and ultrasonic methods were used to get the complete set of constants with self-consistency.
3. Results and discussions
The measured and derived elastic, piezoelectric and dielectric constants of the 0.24PIN-0.43PMN-0.33 PT single crystal poled along [011]c direction have been determined and given in Table 1. Material constants marked with a star (*) were determined directly by resonance or ultrasonic measurements while others were derived values. It was found that the longitudinal/transverse piezoelectric constants d33=229 pC/N, d32= 291 pC/N, and d31=110 pC/N with “1 O” structure are much smaller compared to that of [011]c poled rhombohedral crystals with “2 R” structure, which possess large longitudinal/transverse properties withd33= 1068 pC/N, pC/N, d32 1693 and d31=675 pC/N for [011]c poled 0.24PIN-0.46PMN-0.30 PT [12]. In addition, both shear piezoelectric constants d15 and d24 are very large with d= 4324 pC/N and d24= 1063 pC/N for [011]c poled 0.24PIN-0.43PMN-0.33 PT single crystal, which is significantly different from [011]c poled 0.24PIN–0.46PMN–0.30 PT with large shear d15=3122 pC/N but lowd24=142 pC/N [12]. This is because the polarization rotation is easier in the “1 O” domain structure under electric field parallel to or [100]c, since there is only one polarization orientation remains. Hence, both the shear piezoelectric constants d15 and d24 are large for the “1 O” single domain structure [4].
Table 1.
Measured and derived material constants of [011]c poled 0.24P1N-0.43PMN-0.33 PT single crystal. [Directly measured constants are marked by a star (*).]
| Elastic stiffness constants: and (1010 N/m2) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.35 | 10.93 | 6.67 | 13.25 | 9.13 | 15.31 | 4.92 | 0.32 | 7.42 | |||
| 21.00 | 10.30 | 8.44 | 13.87 | 7.41 | 20.11 | 7.62 | 4.33 | 7.42 | |||
| Elastic compliance constants: and (10−12 m2/N) | |||||||||||
| 8.89 | −7.92 | 0.85 | 19.86 | −8.40 | 11.17 | 20.33 | 312.50 | 13.48 | |||
| 7.80 | −5.03 | −1.42 | 12.23 | −2.39 | 6.45 | 13.13 | 23.10 | 13.48 | |||
| Piezoelectric coefficients: eiλ(C/m2), diλ(1012 C/N), giλ(103 Vm/N), and hiλ(108 V/m) | |||||||||||
| e 15 | e 24 | e 31 | e 32 | e 33 | d 15 | d 24 | |||||
| 13.84 | 52.30 | 5.82 | −5.67 | 15.80 | 4324 | 1063 | 110 | −291 | 229 | ||
| g 15 | g 24 | g 31 | g 32 | g 33 | h 15 | h 24 | h 31 | h 32 | h 33 | ||
| 66.93 | 6.78 | 9.90 | −26.21 | 20.60 | 28.98 | 5.16 | 11.18 | −10.89 | 30.36 | ||
| Dielectric constants: εij(ε0) and β(104/ε0) | |||||||||||
| 540 | 11,450 | 588 | 7300 | 17,730 | 1256 | 18.54 | 0.87 | 17.00 | 1.37 | 0.56 | 7.96 |
| Electromechanical coupling factors kij and density | |||||||||||
| k 15 | k 24 | Density (kg/m3) | |||||||||
| 0.96 | 0.60 | 0.35 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 8198 |
The three-dimensional orientation of d33 by the coordinate transformation using the “1 O” full matrix data is shown in Fig. 1, which revealed large spatial anisotropy. The theoretical value of was calculated in the plane to be 1649 pC/N by Eq. (1), which accounts for 81% of the measured d33=2038 pC/N for [001]c poled 0.24PIN-0.43PMN-0.33 PT multi-domain crystal. It shows that the orientation effect plays an important role in the material properties of domain engineered relaxor-PT ferroelectric crystals but the extrinsic contribution for this system is also significant. We can also conclude that the origin of this large piezoelectric coefficient is mainly from the large shear property d15 of the single-domain crystal.
| (1) |
Fig. 1.
Calculated three-dimensional orientation dependence of d33 by the co-ordinate transformation using the “1O” full matrix data of 0.24PIN-0.43PMN-0.33 PT single crystal.
Similarly, the theoretical value of was calculated in the [100]c-[011]c plane to be 334 pC/N by using Eq. (2), which contributed 83% of the measured d33=400 pC/N for [111]c poled 0.24PIN–0.43PMN–0.33 PT domain engineered crystal. It is important to note that this is consistent with the fact that higher piezoelectric strain is obtained under an electric field along [001]c than a field along [111]c [11]. Based on Eq. (2), the origin of piezoelectric properties is mainly from the shear piezoelectric constant d24, since the d24 is much higher than d32 and d33 in the orthorhombic single-domain crystal.
| (2) |
On the other hand, for domain engineered 0.24PIN–0.43PMN–0.33 PT single crystal, the extrinsic (domain structure) contribution is about ~20%, much higher than that in domain engineered rhombohedral crystal with only ~5% extrinsic contribution [13]. In the case of relaxor-PT single crystal, ferroelectric domain structures miniaturize down to nanometer scales when the composition approaches the MPB, which implies that domain structures play a greater role near the MPB since high density of domain walls are present in the crystals [14].
4. Summary and conclusions
A complete set of elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric constants of [011]c poled 0.24Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–0.43Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.33PbTiO3 ternary single crystal with orthorhombic symmetry has been measured. The [011]c poled single crystal shows macroscopic orthorhombic single-domain properties with ultra-large thickness shear mode piezoelectric coefficient d15=4324 pC/N and very high shear electromechanical coupling factor k15=96%. Both polarization rotation effect and domain wall motions play important roles in the enhanced macroscopic properties for the domain engineered [001]c poled 0.24PIN-0.43PMN-0.33 PT single crystals.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under Grant no. 2013CB632900, the NSFC under Grant no. 11304061, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant no. HIT. NSRIF. 2014083, the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant no. 2013M531029, and the Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund under Grant no. LBH-Z13072.
References
- [1].Peng J, Luo H, He T, Xu H, Lin D. Mater Lett. 2005;59:640–3. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Zhang R, Jiang B, Cao W. J Appl Phys. 2001;90:3471–5. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Sun E, Zhang S, Luo J, Shrout T, Cao W. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97(032902):1–3. doi: 10.1063/1.3466906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Zhang S, Li F, Luo J, Xia R, Hackenberger W, Shrout T. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97(132903):1–3. doi: 10.1063/1.3494532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Dammak H, Renault A, Gaucher P, Thi M, Calvarin G. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2003;42:6477–82. [Google Scholar]
- [6].Bao P, Yan F, Lu X, Zhu J, Shen H, Wang Y, Luo H. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;88(092905):1–3. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Singh A, Pandey D. Phys Rev B. 2003;67(064102):1–12. [Google Scholar]
- [8].Cao H, Li J, Viehland D, Xu G, Shirane G. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;88(072915):1–3. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Li F, Zhang S, Xu Z, Wei X, Luo J, Shrout T. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97(252903):1–3. doi: 10.1063/1.3529952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Tian J, Han P, Huang X, Pan H, Carroll J, III, Payne D. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;91(222903):1–3. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sun E, Cao W. Prog Mater Sci. 2014;65:124–210. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Sun E, Cao W, Han P. Mater Lett. 2011;65:2855–7. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Sun E, Cao W, Jiang W, Han P. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;99(032901):1–3. doi: 10.1063/1.3615684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Sato Y, Hirayama T, Ikuhara Y. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(187601):1–5. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.187601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

