Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1995 Apr;48(4):383–384. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.4.383

Routine urinalysis in renal transplant patients.

P Hashmi 1, C Ho 1, S Morgan 1, J R Stephenson 1
PMCID: PMC502562  PMID: 7615863

Abstract

The performance of two commercially available urine dipstick tests was evaluated to exclude significant bacteriuria in midstream urine samples from patients attending a renal transplant outpatient clinic. The use of dipsticks to reduce the necessity for routine microscopy and culture was also assessed. Consecutive urine samples (n = 497) from 121 patients were examined for leucocytes, nitrite, and blood with Multistix* 10SG (Ames) and Nephur test (Boehring) dipsticks. All urine samples also underwent routine microscopy and culture. The sensitivities of the Nephur test and Multistix were 83% and 82%, respectively; the specificities were 28% and 40%, respectively; the negative predictive values were 85% and 88%, respectively; and the positive predictive values were 24% and 29%, respectively. Underlying conditions and treatments in renal patients may have led to relatively low sensitivity and positive predictive values. Traditional microscopy and culture methods are more reliable for renal transplant recipients.

Full text

PDF
383

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alwall N., Lohi A., Ekenstam J. Factors affecting the reliability of screening tests for bacteriuria. 3. Sensitivity and specificity of the Uriglox and various nitrite tests, including a study of the reliability of the Urnitest as assessed by the screened persons. Acta Med Scand. 1973 Jun;193(6):511–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRUMFITT W. URINARY CELL COUNTS AND THEIR VALUE. J Clin Pathol. 1965 Jul;18:550–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bank C. M., Codrington J. F., van Dieijen-Visser M. P., Brombacher P. J. Screening urine specimen populations for normality using different dipsticks: evaluation of parameters influencing sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1987 May;25(5):299–307. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1987.25.5.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gelbart S. M., Prabhudesai M. M. Evaluation of Chemstrip LN in a male geriatric population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988 Apr;36(4):339–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb02361.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith T. K., Hudson A. J., Spencer R. C. Evaluation of six screening methods for detecting significant bacteriuria. J Clin Pathol. 1988 Aug;41(8):904–909. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.8.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES