Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2016 Jul 21;291(38):19858–19872. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.722520

Non-mutagenic Suppression of Enterocyte Ferroportin 1 by Chemical Ribosomal Inactivation via p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK)-mediated Regulation

EVIDENCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEMOCHROMATOSIS*

Chang-Kyu Oh ‡,1, Seong-Hwan Park ‡,1, Juil Kim , Yuseok Moon ‡,§,2
PMCID: PMC5025675  PMID: 27445333

Abstract

Iron transfer across the basolateral membrane of an enterocyte into the circulation is the rate-limiting step in iron absorption and is regulated by various pathophysiological factors. Ferroportin (FPN), the only known mammalian iron exporter, transports iron from the basolateral surface of enterocytes, macrophages, and hepatocytes into the blood. Patients with genetic mutations in FPN or repeated blood transfusion develop hemochromatosis. In this study, non-mutagenic ribosomal inactivation was assessed as an etiological factor of FPN-associated hemochromatosis in enterocytes. Non-mutagenic chemical ribosomal inactivation disrupted iron homeostasis by regulating expression of the iron exporter FPN-1, leading to intracellular accumulation in enterocytes. Mechanistically, a xenobiotic insult stimulated the intracellular sentinel p38 MAPK signaling pathway, which was positively involved in FPN-1 suppression by ribosomal dysfunction. Moreover, ribosomal inactivation-induced iron accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans as a simplified in vivo model for gut nutrition uptake was dependent on SEK-1, a p38 kinase activator, leading to suppression of FPN-1.1 expression and iron accumulation. In terms of gene regulation, ribosomal stress-activated p38 signaling down-regulated NRF2 and NF-κB, both of which were positive transcriptional regulators of FPN-1 transcription. This study provides molecular evidence for the modulation of iron bioavailability by ribosomal dysfunction as a potent etiological factor of non-mutagenic environmental hemochromatosis in the gut-to-blood axis.

Keywords: intestine; iron metabolism; NF-κB transcription factor; nuclear factor 2 (erythroid-derived 2-like factor, NFE2L2, Nrf2); p38 MAPK; ribosomal inactivation

Introduction

Iron is an essential element required for all living organisms and an abundant transition metal. In addition, iron is essential for hemoglobin synthesis of erythrocytes to carry oxygen from the lungs to the rest of the body (1). Iron plays important roles in cell proliferation, and iron deficiency results in cell growth arrest, DNA damage, and cell apoptosis. Accurate regulation of iron intake, storage, and export is necessary for cellular iron homeostasis, and intracellular distribution is tightly managed by various endogenous regulators. Increased iron deficiency or decreased iron overload results in enhanced dietary iron absorption via the intestinal epithelium. In mammals, iron homeostasis is controlled at the level of iron uptake rather than excretion, making iron absorption across the intestinal epithelial cell a key control point for iron homeostasis (2). Most dietary iron absorption occurs in the duodenum (3). However, disruptions in iron homeostasis result in a variety of diseases of iron overload (hemochromatosis). The most important causes of this state are hereditary hemochromatosis, a genetic disorder, and transfusional iron overload from repeated blood transfusions (4).

The major form of dietary non-heme iron transported into the gastrointestinal tract is ferrous iron (Fe2+). Ferric iron (Fe3+) must be converted to Fe2+ prior to absorption via various enzymes, including ferric reductase (5). Divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1)3 transports iron across the apical membrane of the enterocyte and transfers iron into the cells (6, 7). Absorptive enterocytes also take up iron-containing heme from the diet. Although the mechanisms of heme transportation into enterocytes are less well understood, some candidates, including heme carrier protein 1 (HCP1), a membrane protein, are known to mediate iron-containing heme uptake into enterocytes, whereas free iron is released from the heme by heme oxygenase (HO) (8). Iron transferred into enterocytes is stored as ferritin or exported across the basolateral membrane. The intracellular iron in the enterocytes, which is an important source of plasma iron, is also transported to other tissues or organs, including the liver, bone marrow, and spleen, for iron storage or use (911). For export of intracellular iron from enterocytes to blood vessels, a sole known transporter, ferroportin (FPN), which is expressed in the basolateral membrane of enterocytes, membrane of macrophages, and sinusoidal surfaces of hepatocytes, plays crucial roles in the efflux of iron to other tissues or cells (1214). The iron exported through FPN is oxidized to Fe3+ by hephaestin and then binds to transferrin for circulation in the blood stream (9, 11, 15, 16). FPN is encoded by two tissue-specific spliced transcripts, FPN1A and FPN1B, that produce the same protein. However, FPN transcripts differ in the presence or absence of 5′ iron-responsive elements (IREs), which leads to translational repression of FPN synthesis when iron is lacking. In particular, FPN1B is mainly expressed in enterocytes and erythroid precursors, which are able to export intracellular iron when iron deficiency occurs (17). In addition to posttranscriptional repression, transcriptional and posttranslational regulation are involved in FPN expression in other cells and tissues (18, 19). Patients with genetic mutations in the FPN gene develop hemochromatosis. There are two types of hereditary FPN diseases: macrophage-type and hepatic-type diseases. Loss-of-function mutations in FPN genes causes iron trapping in macrophages, high transferrin saturation, and hepatocellular iron overload (4).

Stress responses by ribosomal inactivation that cause mucosal insults are etiological factors of epithelial inflammatory diseases that have been investigated in various experimental models (2022). Ribosome-inactivating xenobiotics such as deoxynivalenol (DON) belong to a large family of ribonucleolytic agents. A number of these xenobiotics can irreversibly cleave 28S ribosomal RNA at a single phosphodiester bond within a universally conserved sequence known as the sarcin-ricin loop (23). This cleavage leads to peptidyltransferase dysfunction and subsequent global translational arrest (24). This interference leads to a ribotoxic stress response that stimulates intracellular sentinel signaling pathways linked to the activation of cellular stress kinases, including MAPKs (25, 26). This process results in the expression of genes important for cellular homeostasis as well as genes essential to a variety of pathogenic processes involved in cell survival modulation, proliferation, and stress response (26, 27). Moreover, alimentary exposure to several ribosome-inactivating xenobiotics alters the intestinal mucosal integrity by interfering with transepithelial resistance, epithelial differentiation, and nutrient transporting, which are associated with gastrointestinal injuries, malnutrition, and weight loss (2831). Depending on the degree of mucosal insult, ribosomal inactivators such as DON can interfere with the transport of sugars and minerals in different animal models (30, 32, 33). Moreover, some ribosome-inactivating xenobiotics are known to retard iron incorporation into circulatory erythrocytes, bone marrow, and the spleen, which is associated with erythropoietic injuries in animal models (3436).

Iron overload has been shown to induce oxidative stress and DNA damage, which can lead to various disorders, including gastrointestinal distress (3739). Patients with high dietary iron had a higher risk for injuries and inflammation in both the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts (37, 38). In this study, ribosomal inactivation-insulted human enterocytes showed altered levels of intercellular iron accumulation. Iron transfer across the basolateral membrane of the enterocyte into circulation is the rate-limiting step in iron absorption, but any discordance in iron transfer from enterocytes to the circulation would lead to excessive iron accumulation and subsequent mucosal injuries (5, 39). Based on the assumption that iron transfer in the intestine is the main site of iron incorporation from dietary sources and that this can impact mucosal injuries, we investigated the effects of intestinal ribosomal inactivation on rate-limiting iron transport at enterocytes. This investigation provides new insights into iron regulation in the intestinal barrier and iron metabolism-associated disorders, including hemochromatosis in the gastrointestinal tract.

Results

Chemical Ribosomal Inactivation Induces Iron Accumulation in Various Cell Types by Suppression of the Iron Efflux Transporter FPN-1

Enterocytes, specifically duodenal villus cells, play crucial roles in managing iron homeostasis by regulating iron absorption from the diet. Under the assumption that enterocytes insulted by ribosomal inactivation altered iron absorption, we investigated the effects of ribosomal inactivation on intracellular iron levels in human enterocyte cells using HT-29 cells, which have more duodenal characteristics than other intestinal cell lines (3). To investigate the effects of ribosomal stress on iron transport in cells, we measured the intracellular iron levels by Prussian blue staining following ribotoxic stress induced by DON as a representative chemical ribosomal inactivator. 48 h and 72 h after DON exposure, cellular iron accumulation was increased in HT-29 human enterocytes (Fig. 1A). Among the iron transporters, FPN-1 protein, an iron-exporting transporter, was decreased by ribosome-inactivating DON in time- and dose-dependent manners (Fig. 1, B and C). Moreover, FPN-1 mRNA expression was also significantly suppressed in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1, D and E), demonstrating that transcription was reduced in response to ribosomal inactivation, which occurs earlier than translational arrest, the well known intrinsic action of ribosomal inactivation. From the following experiments, chemical-induced ribosomal inactivation was achieved by treating cells with DON (500–1000 ng/ml). Similarly, other chemical ribosomal inactivators, including anisomycin (ANS), 15-acetyl DON (15AcDON), nivalenol (Niv), and T-2 toxin also enhanced intracellular iron accumulation in human enterocytes (Fig. 1F). Mechanistically, these ribotoxic chemical insults suppressed FPN-1 protein and mRNA expression in the same manner as DON (Fig. 1, G and H). In contrast with FPN-1, DMT-1 expression, a major iron-importing transporter, was not altered by ribosomal stress in human enterocytes (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Chemical ribosomal inactivation induces iron accumulation in human intestinal epithelial cells by suppression of the iron exporter FPN-1. A, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 48 or 72 h. During the last 24 h of vehicle or DON treatment, cells were also exposed to 100 μm ferric ammonium citrate. Cellular iron was detected by staining with Prussian blue. Scale bars = 2 μm. Right panel, intracellular iron content of HT-29 cells using a colorimetric ferrozine-based assay. * and *** represent a significant difference from each vehicle group (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001). B, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, quantitation of the relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. *** represents a significant difference from vehicle of each group (p < 0.001). C, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or each dose (nanograms per milliliter) of DON for 48 h. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, quantitation of the relative intensities of FPN-1 protein per actin. *** represents a significant difference from the vehicle group (p < 0.001). D, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. Each mRNA was measured using real-time RT-PCR. * represents a significant difference from the control (p < 0.05). E, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or each dose of DON for 6 h. Each mRNA was measured using real-time RT-PCR. *** represents a significant difference from the vehicle control (p < 0.001). F, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle, 1000 ng/ml DON, 100 ng/ml ANS, 1000 ng/ml 15AcDON, 1000 ng/ml Niv, or 20 ng/ml T-2 toxin for 48 h. During the last 24 h of vehicle or ribosomal inactivator treatment, cells were also exposed to 100 μm ferric ammonium citrate. Cells were fixed, and iron accumulation was detected. Scale bars = 2 μm. Right panel, intracellular iron content of HT-29 cells using a colorimetric ferrozine-based assay. * and ** represent a significant difference from the vehicle group (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01). G, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle, 1000 ng/ml DON, 100 ng/ml ANS, 1000 ng/ml 15AcDON, 1000 ng/ml Niv, or 20 ng/ml T-2 toxin for 48 h. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Right panel, quantitation of the relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. ** and *** represent a significant difference from vehicle of each group (**, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). H, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle, 500 ng/ml DON, 50 ng/ml ANS, 500 ng/ml 15AcDON, 500 ng/ml Niv, or 10 ng/ml T-2 toxin for 6 h. Each mRNA was measured using real-time RT-PCR. *** represents a significant difference from the vehicle control group (p < 0.001). All results are representative of three independent experiments.

As other major iron-absorbing cells, monocytes and hepatocytes were also assessed for the effects of ribosomal inactivation on iron accumulation. Differentiated U937 human monocytes (Fig. 2A) and Huh7 human hepatocytes (Fig. 2C) also showed intracellular iron accumulation in response to ribosomal inactivation in the same manner as human enterocytes. Ribosomal inactivation suppressed FPN-1 protein expression in both monocytes and hepatocytes (Fig. 2, B and D). Moreover, exposure to chemical ribosomal inactivation during the undifferentiated state also suppressed FPN-1 expression in human monocytes (Fig. 2E). Taken together, ribosomal stress induced intercellular iron accumulation in human enterocytes, monocytes (undifferentiated and differentiated), and hepatocytes by suppressing expression of the iron-exporting transporter FPN-1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Chemical ribosomal inactivation accumulates iron via suppression of FPN-1 expression in human monocytes and hepatocytes. A, the human monocyte cell line U937 was differentiated with 10 μm phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate for 48 h. The differentiated monocytes were then treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. During the last 24 h of vehicle or DON treatment, cells were also exposed to 100 μm ferric ammonium citrate. Cellular iron was detected by staining with Prussian blue. Scale bars = 2 μm. Right panel, intracellular iron content in differentiated U937 cells using a colorimetric ferrozine-based assay. * represents a significant difference from the vehicle group (p < 0.05). B, differentiated U937 human monocytes were treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Right panel, quantitation of the relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. * and ** represents a significant difference from each vehicle group (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01). C, the human hepatocyte cell line HepG2 was treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. During the last 24 h of vehicle or DON treatment, cells were also exposed to 100 μm ferric ammonium citrate. Cellular iron was detected by staining with Prussian blue. Scale bars = 2 μm. Right panel, intracellular iron content in HepG2 cells using a colorimetric ferrozine-based assay. ** and *** represents a significant difference from each vehicle group (**, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). D, HepG2 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Right panel, relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. ** represents a significant difference from each vehicle group (p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). E, undifferentiated U937 cells were pretreated with vehicle or each dose of DON for 24 h, and the cells were then exposed to 10 μm phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate for 24 h. Each mRNA was measured using real-time RT-PCR. *** represents a significant difference from the vehicle group (p < 0.001). All results are representative of three independent experiments.

p38 MAPK Signaling Is Critical for FPN Suppression and Subsequent Iron Accumulation by Chemical Ribosomal Inactivation

Ribosomal inactivation stimulates intracellular sentinel signaling pathways that are linked to the activation of cellular stress kinases, including MAPKs, which modulate the expression of genes crucial for homeostasis as well as genes integral to a variety of pathogenic processes (26, 27). We evaluated the involvement of MAPK signals in FPN-1 expression in human IECs. When cells were pretreated with each inhibitor of three major MAPKs (ERK1/2, JNK1/2, and p38 MAPK), p38 MAPK inhibition dramatically restored FPN-1 protein and mRNA expression that had been suppressed by ribosomal inactivation (Fig. 3, A and B). p38 phosphorylation was transiently induced by ribosomal inactivation in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3, C and D). In addition to protein and mRNA analysis, p38 inhibition also restored DON-suppressed FPN-1 gene expression, visualized in human enterocytes using confocal microscopy (Fig. 3E). Taken together, these results indicate that p38 MAPK is positively involved in FPN-1 suppression in ribosomal inactivation-insulted intestinal epithelial cells.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

p38 MAPK plays a key role in regulating FPN-1 expression. A, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON in the absence or presence of 1 μm of U0126, 5 μm SP600125, or 5 μm SB203580 for 48 h. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. Different letters (a–d) over each column represent a significant difference between two groups (p < 0.05). B, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON in the absence or presence of 10 μm SB203580 for 6 h. The graph represents mRNA expression measured using real-time RT-PCR. Different letters (a–d) over each column represent a significant difference between groups (p < 0.05). C, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of p-p38 protein per actin. *** represents a significant difference from the 0 min group. D, HT-29 cells were treated with each dose of DON for 30 min. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of p-p38 protein per actin. *** represents a significant difference from the control group. E, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON in the absence or presence of 5 μm SB203580 for 48 h. Cells were fixed, immunostained, and visualized under a confocal microscope (original magnification, ×1800). Right panel, the relative density of FPN-1 expression based on confocal microscopy. All results are representative of three independent experiments.

Ribosomal Stress-activated p38 Signaling Regulates FPN-1-promoting NRF2 and NF-κB

Among the known transcription factors in FPN-1 transcription, nuclear factor erythroid 2-like (NRF2) binds to antioxidant response elements (AREs)/Maf recognition elements (MAREs) with small Maf protein (sMAF) within the FPN-1 promoter (-7007/-7016) (18, 40). NF-κB is also an important pro-inflammatory transcription factor within the FPN-1 promoter to induce FPN-1 expression (Fig. 4A) (41). In this study, we observed the effects of ribosomal inactivation on NRF2-mediated ARE transcription activity in human enterocytes. Ribosomal inactivation inhibited ARE transcription activity in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). Functionally, NRF2, as a crucial mediator of ARE-involved antioxidant responses, counteracted oxidative stress- or ribosomal inactivation-induced cell growth suppression in human IECs (Fig. 4C). Moreover, total and nuclear levels of NRF2 decreased in response to the ribosomal inactivator DON in enterocytes (Fig. 4, D and E). Other ribosomal inactivators also decreased the nuclear amount of NRF2 (Fig. 4F) and thus suppressed the ARE-linked transcription activity (Fig. 4G).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Chemical ribosomal inactivation suppresses the NRF2-linked signal in IECs. A, schematic of transcriptional regulation in the human FPN-1 promoter. The 5′ UTR of the human FPN-1 gene has two crucial transcriptional binding sites, ARE/MARE and a κB site, which are potent binding regions for NRF2 and NF-κB, respectively. B, HT-29 cells transfected with the ARE-containing reporter plasmid were treated with the indicated dose of DON for 2 h. The luciferase activity of the cellular lysate was measured according to the methods described under “Experimental Procedures.” ** and *** represents a significant difference from the 0 h group (**, p < 0.001; ***, p < 0.001). RLU, relative luciferase units. C, control or NRF2-expressing (NRF2 O/E) HT-29 cells were treated with DMSO, 400 μm H2O2, 1000 ng/ml DON, or 1000 ng/ml DON plus 400 μm H2O2 for 24 h. Cell viability was analyzed using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Different letters (a–g) over each column represent a significant difference between two groups (p < 0.05). D, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle, 1000 ng/ml DON, 100 ng/ml ANS, 1000 ng/ml 15AcDON, 1000 ng/ml Niv, or 20 ng/ml T-2 toxin for 48 h. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of NRF2 protein per actin. *** represents a significant difference from the control group (p < 0.001). E, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON for the indicated time. Cells were fixed, immunostained, and visualized by confocal microscopy (original magnification, ×1800). Right panel, the relative density of nuclear NRF2 based on confocal microscopic observation. *** represents a significant difference from 0 h (p < 0.001). F, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle, 50 ng/ml ANS, 500 ng/ml 15AcDON, 500 ng/ml Niv, or 10 ng/ml T-2 toxin for 30 min. Cells were fixed, immunostained, and visualized by confocal microscopy (original magnification, ×1800). Right panel, the relative density of nuclear NRF2 according to confocal microscopic observation. *, **, and *** represent a significant difference from the vehicle group (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). G, HT-29 cells transfected with the ARE-containing reporter plasmid were treated with vehicle, 50 ng/ml ANS, 500 ng/ml 15AcDON, 500 ng/ml Niv, or 10 ng/ml T-2 toxin for 2 h. The luciferase activity of the cellular lysate was measured as described under “Experimental Procedures.” * and *** represent a significant difference from vehicle of each group (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001). All results are representative of three independent experiments.

Because FPN-1 expression is regulated by ribosomal stress-activated p38 MAPK, we attempted to address the relationship between p38 activation and FPN-1-modulating NRF2 expression in ribosomal inactivation-insulted cells. Ribosomal inactivation suppressed both cytosolic and nucleic NRF2 expression, which were retarded in p38 MAPK-inhibited cells, indicating p38 MAPK-dependent NRF2 suppression (Fig. 5A). Confocal microscopy revealed that ribosomal inactivation-reduced nucleic NRF2 expression was significantly retarded by inhibiting p38 MAPK signals (Fig. 5B). To confirm that NRF2 is a key transcription factor for FPN-1 expression in ribosomal stress-exposed enterocytes, we checked the effects of NRF2 overexpression on FPN-1 expression in enterocytes under the stress of ribosomal inactivation. First, NRF2 overexpression enhanced ARE-linked transcriptional activity, whereas ribosomal inactivation suppressed the reporter activity (Fig. 5C). Moreover, ribosomal inactivation-repressed FPN-1 transcription activity using the human FPN-1 promoter-linked reporter plasmid was also enhanced in NRF2-overexpressed human IECs (Fig. 5D). Because enhanced NRF2 as a crucial transcription factor can promote FPN-1 transcription, NRF2 overexpression restored FPN-1 protein expression that had been suppressed by ribosomal inactivation in human enterocytes (Fig. 5E).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Chemical ribosomal inactivation suppresses NRF2-mediated FPN-1 expression via p38 activation. A, HT-29 cells pre-exposed to the control or 10 μm SB203580 for 1 h were treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON for 30 min. Cytosolic and nuclear fractions of cell lysate were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of nuclear NRF2 protein per heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein. Different letters (a–c) over each column represent a significant difference between two groups (p < 0.05). B, HT-29 cells pre-exposed to control or 10 μm SB203580 for 1 h were treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON for 30 min. Cells were fixed, immunostained, and visualized under a confocal microscope (original magnification, ×1800). Bottom panel, the relative density of nuclear NRF2 based on confocal microscopic observation. The different letters (a–c) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). C, control or NRF2-overexpressing HT-29 cells were transfected with the ARE-containing reporter plasmid and then treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON for 2 h. The luciferase activity of the cellular lysate was measured as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Different letters (a–d) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). RLU, relative light units. D, control or NRF2-expressing HT-29 cells were transfected with the human FPN-1 promoter (−2774/+236)-containing reporter plasmid and then treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 12 h. The luciferase activity of the cellular lysate was measured as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Different letters (a–c) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). E, control or human NRF2-overexpressing (NRF2 O/E) HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 48 h. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Right panel, relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. Different letters (a–c) over each column represent a significant difference between two groups (p < 0.05). All results are representative of three independent experiments.

We also investigated another p38-regulating transcription factor, NF-κB, because the κB binding site is also located in the FPN-1 promoter. A previous study reported that ribosomal inactivation suppressed activation of NF-κB signals (42). In human duodenal enterocytes, ribosomal inactivation suppressed p65 phosphorylation, one of the NF-κB subunits (Fig. 6A). We tested the involvement of NF-κB-linked signals in FPN-1 expression in human duodenal enterocytes. A chemical IκB kinase inhibitor (Bay 11-7082) or induction of a modified IκBα molecule that is a super-repressor protein (SR-IκBα) constitutively sequestering NF-κB in the cytoplasm down-regulated FPN-1 expression (Fig. 6, B and C). Moreover, Bay 11-7082 or SR-IκBα expression was shown to repress FPN-1 transcription activity in cells transfected with the human FPN-1 promoter-linked reporter plasmid (Fig. 6, D and E). This suppression was more prominent in the presence of the chemical ribosomal inactivator in human IECs. In terms of the signaling pathway, ribosomal inactivation-triggered p38 MAPK was assessed for its relationship with the NF-κB-linked signal. Inhibition of p38 kinase attenuated p65 dephosphorylation by ribosomal inactivation, indicating that p38 MAPK is the upstream negative regulator of the NF-κB signal in human duodenal enterocytes under the chemical stress of ribosomal inactivation (Fig. 6F). Among the various negative regulators of the NF-κB signal, A20 was induced by chemical ribosomal inactivation, which was also dependent on the p38 MAPK-linked pathway in our model (Fig. 6G). Furthermore, genetic knockdown of A20 using its shRNA repressed ribosomal inactivation-induced p65 dephosphorylation (Fig. 6H), suggesting that p38 MAPK-induced A20 down-regulates NF-κB activation in human enterocytes. Taken together, ribosomal stress suppressed FPN-1 expression via p38 MAPK-mediated A20 and subsequent down-regulation of the NF-κB signal. In conclusion, ribosomal inactivation suppressed expression of the iron-exporting transporter FPN-1 via p38-mediated suppression of NRF2 expression, one of the crucial transcription factors, as well as NF-κB signals.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Chemical ribosomal inactivation suppresses NF-κB-mediated FPN-1 expression via p38 activation. A, HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 500 ng/ml DON each time. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of p-p65 protein per actin. * and ** represent a significant difference from the vehicle group (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01). B, HT-29 cells were exposed to vehicle or 20 μm Bay 11-7082 for 2 h. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. *** represents a significant difference from the vehicle group (p < 0.001). C, top panel, lysates of control- or SR-IκB-transfected HT-29 cells were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of FPN-1 protein per actin. *** represents a significant difference from the vehicle group (p < 0.001). D, human FPN-1 promoter (−2774/+236)-containing reporter plasmid-transfected HT-29 cells were pre-exposed to control or 20 μm Bay 11-7082 for 2 h and treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 12 h. The luciferase activity of the cellular lysate was measured as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Different letters (a–d) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). RLU, relative light units. E, control or SR-IκB-expressing HT-29 cells were transfected with the human FPN-1 promoter (−2774/+236)-containing reporter plasmid and then treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 12 h. The luciferase activity of the cellular lysate was measured as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Different letters (a–c) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). F, HT-29 cells pretreated with control or 10 μm SB203580 for 2 h were exposed to vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 30 min. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel, relative intensity of p-p65 protein per actin. Different letters (a and b) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). G, HT-29 cells were pre-exposed to control or 10 μm SB203580 for 2 h and treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 4 h. Each mRNA was measured by real-time RT-PCR. Different letters (a–c) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). H, control or A20 shRNA-transfected HT-29 cells were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 30 min. Cellular lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis. Bottom panel (boxed), the relative levels of A20 mRNA in HT-29 cells transfected with control or the A20 shRNA expression plasmid. Right panel, relative intensity of p-p65 protein per actin. Different letters (a–d) over each column represent significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). All results are representative of three independent experiments.

Chemical Ribosomal Inactivation Induces Iron Accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans via Regulation of FPN-1.1 Expression through SEK-1 Signals

C. elegans is a nematode with a simple epithelial lining barrier for both defense and nutrient absorption; therefore, it is a good model for mucosal stress responses, including ribosomal inactivation (43, 44). In this study, C. elegans was used as an in vivo model to confirm the iron accumulation in response to ribosomal inactivation in cell culture models. Ribosomal inactivation significantly increased gut epithelial iron accumulation in the wild-type N2 strain (Fig. 7A). FPN1.1, which is a critical iron exporter homologous to human FPN-1, was quantified in C. elegans following ribosomal inactivation. Although FPN-1.1 expression was reduced in the N2 strain following ribosomal inactivation, it was restored in the sek-1 mutant strain (AU1, a homolog of human MAP2K-activating p38 kinase) of C. elegans, indicating SEK-1-dependent suppression of FPN-1.1 (Fig. 7B). Moreover, the length of C. elegans as a readout of nutrient-dependent growth was severely reduced in the ribosomal inactivation-insulted N2 strain; however, there was no significant shortening of the AU1 strain (Fig. 7C). Taken together, ribosomal inactivation-induced iron accumulation in C. elegans is dependent on SEK-1, a p38 kinase activator of suppression of FPN-1.1 expression, leading to growth suppression by ribosomal inactivation. These in vivo results support the assumption that ribosomal inactivation increases gut iron accumulation by reducing the expression of FPN-1 via p38 activation.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Chemical ribosomal inactivation causes iron accumulation in C. elegans. A, N2 strain C. elegans (1000 worms/60-mm dish) were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 36 h. Cells were fixed, and iron accumulation was detected by Prussian blue staining, Right panel, the relative quantity of accumulated iron around the gut lining. ** represents a significant difference from the vehicle group (p < 0.01). B, N2 or AU1 strain C. elegans (1000 worms/60 mm dish) were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 36 h. Each mRNA was measured by real-time RT-PCR. * and *** represent a significant difference from the N2/vehicle or N2/DON group (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001). C, N2 or AU1 strain C. elegans were treated with vehicle or 1000 ng/ml DON for 36 h. *** represents a significant difference from vehicle of each group (p < 0.001; n.s., not significant). All results are representative of three independent experiments.

Discussion

Dietary iron absorption across intestinal epithelial cells is a key control point for iron homeostasis because the intracellular iron in enterocytes is an important source of plasma iron that is transported to other tissues or organs for iron storage or use. In this study, enterocytes insulted by ribosomal inactivation showed increased intracellular iron accumulation via decreased FPN-1 protein. DMT1 is a passage used to import luminal Fe2+ from food intake in the small intestine, and excessive Fe2+ is exported via the iron-exporting transporter FPN-1 for iron distribution via blood vessels to other organs or tissues. Ribosomal inactivation disrupted this iron homeostasis in enterocytes via regulation of the exporter, leading to intracellular accumulation in enterocytes. Ribosomal inactivation impairs iron efflux via suppression of FPN-1 expression, a crucial iron-exporting transporter in enterocytes. Ribosomal inactivation in human enterocytes leads to rapid down-regulation of NRF2 and NF-κB, which are positive transcription factors binding to the ARE and conserved κB binding sites within the human FPN-1 promoter (Fig. 8). Mechanistically, ribosomal inactivation activated p38 MAPK as an integral regulator of NRF2 expression and NF-κB activation, leading to reduced FPN-1 expression.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

A putative scheme for the molecular regulation of chemical ribosomal inactivation-enhanced iron accumulation via suppression of FPN-1 expression in human enterocytes. Fe2+ in the luminal region of the intestine is imported through the iron transporter DMT1. Imported Fe2+ is released via FPN-1, which transports iron from the inside of enterocytes to the extracellular matrix (ECM) and into the blood circulation. Ribosomal inactivation leads to intracellular Fe2+ accumulation via suppression of FPN-1 expression. FPN-1 expression is mediated by two transcription factors, NRF2 and NF-κB. The ARE and κB binding site (κB BS) are located in the FPN-1 promoter, and NRF2 and NF-κB are crucial transcription factors that promote FPN-1 transcription in IECs. Ribosomal inactivation regulates FPN-1 expression through suppression of NRF2 gene expression and inhibition of NF-κB phosphorylation. Moreover, a reduction in NRF2 contributes to a reduced antioxidant response to the toxicity of chemical ribosomal inactivation. In summary, ribosomal inactivation suppresses NRF2 expression and NF-κB activation, leading to suppression of FPN-1 expression and potent retardation of the iron supply for systemic use.

This is the first report of negative regulation of FPN-1 by p38 MAPK, although activation of p38 mediates FPN-1 induction by interleukin 1β (41). Several studies, including this one, have demonstrated inhibitory effects of p38 on NRF2 and NF-κB (45, 46). However, most studies indicate that p38 MAPK is positively associated with activation of NRF2 and NF-κB, which are crucial transcription factors involved in FPN-1 induction (47, 48). In response to mucosal insults leading to ribosomal inactivation, pharmacological inhibition of p38 MAPK enhanced expression and nuclear translocation of NRF2 as well as phosphorylation of p65, which can be explained by several different indirect activation mechanisms. First, genetic or pharmacological inhibition of p38 may trigger compensatory activation of other MAPKs, such as ERK1/2, which can be positively involved in activation of NRF2 and NF-κB without p38 activation (49, 50). Second, blocking of p38 can enhance production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), triggering antioxidative mediators via the NRF2-linked signal. In particular, ROS-sensing p38 can induce apoptosis of ROS-mediated transformed cells and prevent ROS accumulation, leading to carcinogenic effects (51). Therefore, p38 suppression may cause ROS accumulation and subsequent activation of ARE-promoting NRF2. Ribosomal inactivation can also increase ROS production (52, 53), and subsequent p38 activation may counteract ROS-mediated action, which would limit further activation of NRF2-linked responses. However, cytotoxic levels of ribosomal inactivation may produce excessive ROS and subsequent antioxidative responses via NRF2 to overcome its cytotoxicity (54). In our previous report (55), ribosomal inactivation suppressed proliferation of human enterocyte via cell cycle arrest. In this study, ROS- or ribosomal inactivation-induced cell growth retardation was attenuated by overexpression of ARE-promoting NRF2 (Fig. 4C), suggesting that NRF2 is not only a critical positive regulator of FPN-1 expression but also a potent survival-related factor against growth suppressive actions of the ribosomal inactivation or ROS. Therefore, suppression of NRF2 by ribosomal inactivation may contribute to reduced viability of enterocytes as well as iron accumulation under chemical stress. Because intracellular iron overload can cause cell growth arrest or cytotoxicity, a reduction in NRF2 accounts well for the iron accumulation and subsequent suppression of cell growth in ribosome-insulted enterocytes. Although we demonstrated the mechanism of iron accumulation via NRF2 regulation by ribosomal inactivation, some questions still remain regarding signaling modulation. First, the effects of ribosomal inactivation and p38 activation on other transcription factors need to be addressed because NRF2-interacting proteins such as sMAF can promote transcription of ARE-promoted genes (56). In addition, biochemical modification of NRF2-linked signaling molecules such as phosphorylation or ubiquitin-mediated degradation can be important factors influencing gene regulation by ribosomal inactivation. NRF2 is not only important for iron metabolism but also for the general antioxidant response. NRF2 is usually restrained in the cytoplasm in association with Keap1, which can degrade quickly via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in response to oxidative and oncogenic stress (57). Under oncogenic and oxidative stress, free NRF2 translocates into the nucleus for activation of antioxidative stress-related enzymes such as HO-1, NQO-1, or GSTA-2, which is crucial for cellular defense under the effects of toxicants or carcinogens (58). In this study, cellular stress caused by ribosomal inactivation retarded NRF2 activation, making cells more susceptible to oxidative and oncogenic insults.

As shown in this study, NRF2 suppression by ribosomal inactivation via p38 MAPK would retard the antioxidative response, which is essential for cellular survival. In diverse mucosal injury models, epithelial NF-κB is also involved in survival and protective actions, including wound healing responses, by increasing cellular proliferation (59, 60). Moreover, epithelial NF-κB promotes the reconstitution of injured mucosal monolayers via up-regulation of target genes such as inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2, which are strong mediators of epithelial migration to the site of injury (61, 62). Thus, it can be speculated that the wound healing and epithelial survival processes during mucosal inflammation are interfered with in response to NF-κB suppression by ribosomal inactivation (63). However, in terms of inflammation, ribosomal inactivation-suppressed NF-κB signaling in gut epithelial cells can contribute to enhanced tolerance of mucosal inflammation by gut microbes. Our previous report demonstrated that pre-exposure to ribosomal inactivation attenuated endotoxin-induced pro-inflammatory signals in gut epithelial cells (64, 65). As mentioned above, despite the increased tolerance of pro-inflammatory stress via decreased NF-κB, retardation of pro-survival signals in association with low NF-κB and NRF2 signals indicates inefficient epithelial protection against luminal insult in the intestine.

In terms of the interorgan network, FPN-1 is also regulated by hepcidin, which is secreted from the liver to the blood in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines, hepatocellular iron loading, and endoplasmic reticulum stress (6668). Hepcidin binds to FPN-1 in the duodenum, liver, or macrophages and induces internalization and proteasome-dependent degradation of FPN-1, leading to phosphorylation of FPN-1 in the membrane and internalization to the cytoplasm for degradation through the JAK-STAT pathway or other pathways (14, 69, 70). Moreover, DMT-1, which imports divalent metals (iron, zinc, manganese, copper, cobalt, and nickel (7175)) is also regulated by hepcidin like FPN-1, depending on the status of inflammation and iron levels (76, 77). Therefore, it is necessary to assess the effects of ribosomal inactivation on hepcidin-mediated iron metabolism using in vivo models. C. elegans has well developed iron metabolism-related proteins, most of which are homologous with human iron metabolism-related proteins; namely, SMF-3 for DMT-1, FTN-1 and 2 for ferritin, and FPN.1–1 for FPN-1 (78). C. elegans can thus be considered a suitable model for in vivo experiments for the investigation of iron metabolism.

Recycling of iron is as important as daily absorption of dietary iron for maintaining homeostasis. The iron from destroyed RBCs is reabsorbed by circulating macrophages via phagocytosis, after which macrophages export iron for recycling in erythropoiesis (79). According to our results, ribosomal inactivation was able to disrupt this recycling by down-regulating FPN-1 expression in human monocytes (Fig. 2, A, B, and E). As a result, chronic insults by ribosomal inactivation would contribute to iron deficiency-associated anemia. Accordingly, further investigation of macrophage regulation of systemic iron metabolism is warranted. Iron is a necessary metal nutrient required by all living organisms for the transportation of oxygen. Accordingly, its absorption and recycling is physiologically important for the maintenance of homeostasis. However ribosomal inactivation would interfere with the systemic bioavailability of iron from the diet and disturb the recycling of iron by suppressing the iron exporter FPN-1 in macrophages and hepatocytes. In addition to defects in bioavailability and recycling of iron, our mechanistic investigation demonstrated that ribosomal inactivation down-regulated NRF2-linked signals, which are essential for the induction of antioxidative defense genes in tissues and cells. Therefore, extended ribosomal inactivation is not beneficial for the maintenance of cellular integrity because cells would be exposed to accumulated oxidative and oncogenic stress. This study provides novel insights into the effects of organellar dysfunction on iron metabolism as well as NRF2-linked defense against oxidative stress in the biological system.

Experimental Procedures

Cell Culture Conditions and Reagents

HT-29, HepG2, and U937 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Welgene, Daegu, South Korea) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS (Welgene), 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin (Welgene) in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37 °C. The number of cells was counted by exclusion of trypan blue dye (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) using a hematocytometer. DON, ANS, 15AcDON, NIV, T-2 toxin, and SP600125 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. SB203580 was purchased from Calbiochem (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA). U0126 was purchased from assay design (Enzo Life Science, Plymouth Meeting, PA). All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Construction and Transient Transfection of Plasmids

NC16 Pcdna3.1-FLAG-NRF2 was purchased from Addgene. The FLAG-SR-IκBα expression vector has been described previously (64, 80). The human FPN-1 promoter (−2774/+236) was amplified using Prime Star Taq (TAKARA, Shiga, Japan) with human genomic DNA, cloned into the CloneJET PCR cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) followed by excision at the BglII (Enzynomics, Daejeon, South Korea) site, and then transferred into the pGL4.14 [luc2/hygro] vector (Promega, Fitchburg, WI). The primers were as follows: CGT TCT TGA AAT TTG CCT GTA ACA C and AGC CTT GGG CAA AAA GAC TAC AAC G. The ARE-luciferase vector was kindly provided by Donna D. Zhang (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ). HT-29 cells were transfected with a mixture of plasmids and OmicsFect transfection reagent (Omics Bio, Taipei, Taiwan) according to the protocols of the manufacturer. The efficiency of transfection was maintained at 40–50% and confirmed by expression of a pMX-GFP vector.

Prussian Blue Staining in Vitro

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and then washed with PBS twice. Next, cells were stained with a mixture of 10% potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 20% hydrochloric acid for 30 min at room temperature and then washed with PBS twice. Cells were subsequently counterstained with nuclear fast red (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min and washed five times with PBS. Sections were examined using a Moticam Pro 205A (Motic, Hong Kong, China).

Quantitation of Intracellular Iron by Colorimetric Ferrozine Assay

Methods for the quantitation of intracellular iron by colorimetric ferrozine assay have been described previously (81). Cells were lysed with 200 μl of 50 mm NaOH for 2 h on a shaker in a humidified atmosphere. Aliquots of cell lysates were mixed with 100 μl of 10 mm HCl (the solvent of the iron standard FeCl3) and 100 μl of iron-releasing reagent (a freshly mixed solution of equal volumes of 1.4 m HCl and 4.5% (w/v) KMnO4 in H2O). These mixtures were incubated for 2 h at 60 °C within a fume hood because chlorine gas is produced during the reaction (82). After the mixtures had cooled to room temperature, 30 μl of the iron-detection reagent (6.5 mm ferrozine, 6.5 mm neocuproine, 2.5 m ammonium acetate, and 1 m ascorbic acid dissolved in water) was added to each tube. After 30 min, 280 μl of the solution in each tube was transferred into a well of a 96-well plate, and the absorbance was measured at 550 nm on a microplate reader (VERSAmax tunable microplate reader, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The iron content of the samples was calculated by comparing its absorbance with that of a range of standard concentrations of equal volume that had been prepared in a way similar to that of the sample (a mixture of 100 μl of FeCl3 standards (0–300 μm) in 10 mm HCl, 100 μl 50 mm NaOH, 100 μl of releasing reagent, and 30 μl of detection reagent). The intracellular iron concentration determined for each well of a cell culture was normalized against the protein content of that well.

Reverse Transcription and Real-time PCR

Methods for RNA extraction, conventional and real-time PCR, and analysis have been described previously (42). The 5′ forward and 3′ reverse complement PCR primers for amplifying each gene were as follows: human FPN-1 (5′-TAT TTC GGG ATG GAA CTT GG-3′ and 5′-ACC ACA TTT TCG ACG TAG CC-3′), human GAPDH (5′-TCA ACG GAT TTG GTC GTA TT-3′ and 5′-CTG TGG TCA TGA GTC CTT CC-3′), C. elegans fpn.1–1 (5′-ATT CGA TAA CCT CGC CGC AT-3′ and 5′-GGA TTC GAG ACT CGG CTC AG-3′), and C. elegans act-1 (5′-CCA AGA GAG GTA TCC TTA CC-3′ and 5′-CTT GGA TGG CGA CAT ACA TG-3′). All experiments included three replicates, and each independent experiment was repeated three times.

Western Immunoblotting Analysis

Expression of proteins was assessed by Western immunoblotting analysis using goat polyclonal anti-FPN-1 and rabbit polyclonal anti-β-actin antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and rabbit monoclonal anti-human NRF2, rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-p38, rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-p65, rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-IκBα, and rabbit polyclonal anti-IκBα antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Monoclonal anti-FLAG was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The process of Western blotting analysis was described previously (42).

Confocal Microscopy

Cells were cultured in glass-bottom culture dishes (SPL Life Science, Pocheon, South Korea). The process of confocal microscopy was described in previous report (42).

Luciferase Assay

Cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed with passive lysis buffer (Promega), after which cell lysates were centrifuged at 13,475 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, isolated, and stored at −80 °C until being assessed for luciferase activity. The measurement of luciferase activity was described previously (42).

Cell Viability Assay

Colorimetric analysis of cell growth was performed with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Cells (5 ×104/well) were cultured in a 96-well plate each time, and the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (20 μl from 5 mg/ml stock solution) was added to the cells for 2 h. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was dissolved with 100 μl of DMSO. The optical density was read at 560 nm with the background at 670 nm subtracted. The optical density was directly correlated with the quantity of cells.

C. elegans Culture Conditions and Chemical Treatment

Wild-type C. elegans, N2, and C. elegans with mutated sek-1 (homology with MAPKK), AU1 (derived from N2 through ethyl methanesulfonate mutagen exposure), were kindly provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN). C. elegans was maintained on a streptomycin-resistant Escherichia coli OP50 spread nematode growth medium plate (50 Mm NaCl, 1.7% agar, 0.25% peptone, 1 mm CaCl2, 5 μg/ml cholesterol, 1 mm MgSO4, and 25 mm KPO4 in Dh2O) at 24 °C. Streptomycin-resistant E. coli OP50 was kindly provided by Seung-Jae Lee (Postech, Pohang, South Korea). The number of C. elegans was counted by suspension in M9 buffer (22 mm KH2PO4, 42 mm Na2HPO4, 86 mm NaCl, and 1 mm MgSO4 in Dh2O). C. elegans were synchronized with a mixture of 500 μl of 5 N NaOH, 1 ml of household bleach (Yohanclorox, Seoul, South Korea), and 5 ml Dh2O. Synchronized eggs were seeded on an nematode growth medium plate without OP50 overnight, after which L1 were collected with M9 buffer. C. elegans were washed with M9 buffer, counted for seeding on a nematode growth medium plate (A600 = 0.6), and spread.

Prussian Blue Staining of C. elegans

C. elegans were collected using M9 buffer, centrifuged at 190 × g for 2 min, and then washed with M9 buffer twice. Washed C. elegans were fixed with 40% isopropanol overnight at 4 °C and then washed with M9 buffer. C. elegans were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in M9 buffer overnight at 4 °C and washed with M9 buffer twice. Next, C. elegans were stained with a mixture of 10% potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 20% hydrochloric acid overnight at 4 °C and then washed with M9 buffer twice. Stained C. elegans were dropped onto glass slides, covered with glass, and examined using a Moticam Pro 205A microscope (Motic).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using Sigma Stat for Windows (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA). Student's t test was used to compare two groups of data, whereas analysis of variance was used to compare multiple groups, and pairwise comparisons were made using the Student-Newman-Keuls method. Data not meeting normality assumptions were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA by ranks, and pairwise comparisons were then made with the Student-Newman-Keuls method.

Author Contributions

Project design and hypotheses were made by C. O. and Y. M. C. O., J. K., and S. P. conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. Y. M. and S. P. prepared the manuscript. Y. M. supervised the overall project.

*

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning Grant NRF-2015R1A2A1A15056056 and Grant HI13C0259 from the Korean Health Technology Research and Development Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

3
The abbreviations used are:
DMT
divalent metal transporter
HO
heme oxygenase
FPN
ferroportin
DON
deoxynivalenol
ANS
anisomycin
15AcDON
15-acetyl deoxynivalenol
Niv
nivalenol
IEC
intestinal epithelial cell
ARE
antioxidant response element
MARE
Maf recognition element
sMAF
small Maf protein.

References

  • 1. Outten F. W., and Theil E. C. (2009) Iron-based redox switches in biology. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11, 1029–1046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Andrews N. C. (1999) Disorders of iron metabolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 1986–1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Davies P. S., and Enns C. A. (2004) Expression of the hereditary hemochromatosis protein HFE increases ferritin levels by inhibiting iron export in HT29 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 25085–25092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Griffiths W. J., Mayr R., McFarlane I., Hermann M., Halsall D. J., Zoller H., and Cox T. M. (2010) Clinical presentation and molecular pathophysiology of autosomal dominant hemochromatosis caused by a novel ferroportin mutation. Hepatology 51, 788–795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Han O., Failla M. L., Hill A. D., Morris E. R., and Smith J. C. Jr. (1995) Reduction of Fe(III) is required for uptake of nonheme iron by Caco-2 cells. J. Nutr. 125, 1291–1299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fleming M. D., Trenor C. C. 3rd, Su M. A., Foernzler D., Beier D. R., Dietrich W. F., and Andrews N. C. (1997) Microcytic anaemia mice have a mutation in Nramp2, a candidate iron transporter gene. Nat. Genet. 16, 383–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gunshin H., Mackenzie B., Berger U. V., Gunshin Y., Romero M. F., Boron W. F., Nussberger S., Gollan J. L., and Hediger M. A. (1997) Cloning and characterization of a mammalian proton-coupled metal-ion transporter. Nature 388, 482–488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shayeghi M., Latunde-Dada G. O., Oakhill J. S., Laftah A. H., Takeuchi K., Halliday N., Khan Y., Warley A., McCann F. E., Hider R. C., Frazer D. M., Anderson G. J., Vulpe C. D., Simpson R. J., and McKie A. T. (2005) Identification of an intestinal heme transporter. Cell 122, 789–801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. De Domenico I., McVey Ward D., and Kaplan J. (2008) Regulation of iron acquisition and storage: consequences for iron-linked disorders. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 72–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Steele T. M., Frazer D. M., and Anderson G. J. (2005) Systemic regulation of intestinal iron absorption. IUBMB Life 57, 499–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yeh K. Y., Yeh M., and Glass J. (2011) Interactions between ferroportin and hephaestin in rat enterocytes are reduced after iron ingestion. Gastroenterology 141, 292–299, 299.e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Abboud S., and Haile D. J. (2000) A novel mammalian iron-regulated protein involved in intracellular iron metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19906–19912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Canonne-Hergaux F., Donovan A., Delaby C., Wang H. J., and Gros P. (2006) Comparative studies of duodenal and macrophage ferroportin proteins. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 290, G156–163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ramey G., Deschemin J. C., Durel B., Canonne-Hergaux F., Nicolas G., and Vaulont S. (2010) Hepcidin targets ferroportin for degradation in hepatocytes. Haematologica 95, 501–504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. McKie A. T., Marciani P., Rolfs A., Brennan K., Wehr K., Barrow D., Miret S., Bomford A., Peters T. J., Farzaneh F., Hediger M. A., Hentze M. W., and Simpson R. J. (2000) A novel duodenal iron-regulated transporter, IREG1, implicated in the basolateral transfer of iron to the circulation. Mol. Cell 5, 299–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Chen H., Huang G., Su T., Gao H., Attieh Z. K., McKie A. T., Anderson G. J., and Vulpe C. D. (2006) Decreased hephaestin activity in the intestine of copper-deficient mice causes systemic iron deficiency. J. Nutr. 136, 1236–1241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang D. L., Hughes R. M., Ollivierre-Wilson H., Ghosh M. C., and Rouault T. A. (2009) A ferroportin transcript that lacks an iron-responsive element enables duodenal and erythroid precursor cells to evade translational repression. Cell Metab. 9, 461–473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Harada N., Kanayama M., Maruyama A., Yoshida A., Tazumi K., Hosoya T., Mimura J., Toki T., Maher J. M., Yamamoto M., and Itoh K. (2011) Nrf2 regulates ferroportin 1-mediated iron efflux and counteracts lipopolysaccharide-induced ferroportin 1 mRNA suppression in macrophages. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 508, 101–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Frazer D. M., Wilkins S. J., Becker E. M., Vulpe C. D., McKie A. T., Trinder D., and Anderson G. J. (2002) Hepcidin expression inversely correlates with the expression of duodenal iron transporters and iron absorption in rats. Gastroenterology 123, 835–844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Maresca M., and Fantini J. (2010) Some food-associated mycotoxins as potential risk factors in humans predisposed to chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases. Toxicon 56, 282–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Thorpe C. M., Smith W. E., Hurley B. P., and Acheson D. W. (2001) Shiga toxins induce, superinduce, and stabilize a variety of C-X-C chemokine mRNAs in intestinal epithelial cells, resulting in increased chemokine expression. Infect. Immun. 69, 6140–6147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yoder J. M., Aslam R. U., and Mantis N. J. (2007) Evidence for widespread epithelial damage and coincident production of monocyte chemotactic protein 1 in a murine model of intestinal ricin intoxication. Infect. Immun. 75, 1745–1750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Iordanov M. S., Pribnow D., Magun J. L., Dinh T. H., Pearson J. A., Chen S. L., and Magun B. E. (1997) Ribotoxic stress response: activation of the stress-activated protein kinase JNK1 by inhibitors of the peptidyl transferase reaction and by sequence-specific RNA damage to the α-sarcin/ricin loop in the 28S rRNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 3373–3381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Stirpe F., and Battelli M. G. (2006) Ribosome-inactivating proteins: progress and problems. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 63, 1850–1866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Smith W. E., Kane A. V., Campbell S. T., Acheson D. W., Cochran B. H., and Thorpe C. M. (2003) Shiga toxin 1 triggers a ribotoxic stress response leading to p38 and JNK activation and induction of apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 71, 1497–1504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Shifrin V. I., and Anderson P. (1999) Trichothecene mycotoxins trigger a ribotoxic stress response that activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and induces apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13985–13992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Laskin J. D., Heck D. E., and Laskin D. L. (2002) The ribotoxic stress response as a potential mechanism for MAP kinase activation in xenobiotic toxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 69, 289–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bouhet S., and Oswald I. P. (2005) The effects of mycotoxins, fungal food contaminants, on the intestinal epithelial cell-derived innate immune response. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 108, 199–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Calvert T. W., Aidoo K. E., Candlish A. G., and Fuat A. R. (2005) Comparison of in vitro cytotoxicity of Fusarium mycotoxins, deoxynivalenol, T-2 toxin and zearalenone on selected human epithelial cell lines. Mycopathologia 159, 413–419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Maresca M., Mahfoud R., Garmy N., and Fantini J. (2002) The mycotoxin deoxynivalenol affects nutrient absorption in human intestinal epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 132, 2723–2731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sergent T., Parys M., Garsou S., Pussemier L., Schneider Y. J., and Larondelle Y. (2006) Deoxynivalenol transport across human intestinal Caco-2 cells and its effects on cellular metabolism at realistic intestinal concentrations. Toxicol. Lett. 164, 167–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hunder G., Schümann K., Strugala G., Gropp J., Fichtl B., and Forth W. (1991) Influence of subchronic exposure to low dietary deoxynivalenol, a trichothecene mycotoxin, on intestinal absorption of nutrients in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 29, 809–814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Awad W. A., Aschenbach J. R., Setyabudi F. M., Razzazi-Fazeli E., Böhm J., and Zentek J. (2007) In vitro effects of deoxynivalenol on small intestinal d-glucose uptake and absorption of deoxynivalenol across the isolated jejunal epithelium of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 86, 15–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Faifer G. C., and Godoy H. M. (1991) Acute effects of T-2 toxin on radioactive iron incorporation into circulating erythrocytes in mice. Toxicology 70, 133–140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Faifer G. C., Zabal O., and Godoy H. M. (1992) Further studies on the hematopoietic damage produced by a single dose of T-2 toxin in mice. Toxicology 75, 169–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Velazco V., Faifer G. C., and Godoy H. M. (1996) Differential effects of T-2 toxin on bone marrow and spleen erythropoiesis in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 371–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kaye P., Abdulla K., Wood J., James P., Foley S., Ragunath K., and Atherton J. (2008) Iron-induced mucosal pathology of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a common finding in patients on oral iron therapy. Histopathology 53, 311–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Baldwin G. S. (2009) Gastrins, iron and colorectal cancer. Metallomics 1, 370–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zhou W. X., Wu X. R., Bennett A. E., and Shen B. (2014) Endoscopic and histologic abnormalities of gastrointestinal tract in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 48, 336–342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Marro S., Chiabrando D., Messana E., Stolte J., Turco E., Tolosano E., and Muckenthaler M. U. (2010) Heme controls ferroportin1 (FPN1) transcription involving Bach1, Nrf2 and a MARE/ARE sequence motif at position −7007 of the FPN1 promoter. Haematologica 95, 1261–1268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Persichini T., Maio N., di Patti M. C., Rizzo G., Toscano S., Colasanti M., and Musci G. (2010) Interleukin-1β induces ceruloplasmin and ferroportin-1 gene expression via MAP kinases and C/EBPβ, AP-1, and NF-κB activation. Neurosci. Lett. 484, 133–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Park S. H., Do K. H., Choi H. J., Kim J., Kim K. H., Park J., Oh C. G., and Moon Y. (2013) Novel regulatory action of ribosomal inactivation on epithelial Nod2-linked proinflammatory signals in two convergent ATF3-associated pathways. J. Immunol. 191, 5170–5181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Boyd W. A., McBride S. J., Rice J. R., Snyder D. W., and Freedman J. H. (2010) A high-throughput method for assessing chemical toxicity using a Caenorhabditis elegans reproduction assay. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 245, 153–159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Gowrinathan Y., Pacan J. C., Hawke A., Zhou T., and Sabour P. M. (2011) Toxicity assay for deoxynivalenol using Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 28, 1235–1241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Yu R., Mandlekar S., Lei W., Fahl W. E., Tan T. H., and Kong A. N. (2000) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase negatively regulates the induction of phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes that detoxify carcinogens. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2322–2327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Naidu S., Vijayan V., Santoso S., Kietzmann T., and Immenschuh S. (2009) Inhibition and genetic deficiency of p38 MAPK up-regulates heme oxygenase-1 gene expression via Nrf2. J. Immunol. 182, 7048–7057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Chen H. H., Wang T. C., Lee Y. C., Shen P. T., Chang J. Y., Yeh T. K., Huang C. H., Chang H. H., Cheng S. Y., Lin C. Y., Shih C., Chen C. T., Liu W. M., Chen C. H., and Kuo C. C. (2015) Novel Nrf2/ARE activator, trans-coniferylaldehyde, induces a HO-1-mediated defense mechanism through a dual p38alpha/MAPKAPK-2 and PK-N3 signaling pathway. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 28, 1681–1692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kuwano T., Watanabe M., Kagawa D., and Murase T. (2015) Hydrolyzed methylhesperidin induces antioxidant enzyme expression via the Nrf2-ARE pathway in normal human epidermal keratinocytes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 63, 7937–7944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Harada S., Nakagawa T., Yokoe S., Edogawa S., Takeuchi T., Inoue T., Higuchi K., and Asahi M. (2015) Autophagy deficiency diminishes indomethacin-induced intestinal epithelial cell damage through activation of the ERK/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 355, 353–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Verma A. K., Yadav A., Dewangan J., Singh S. V., Mishra M., Singh P. K., and Rath S. K. (2015) Isoniazid prevents Nrf2 translocation by inhibiting ERK1 phosphorylation and induces oxidative stress and apoptosis. Redox. Biol. 6, 80–92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Dolado I., Swat A., Ajenjo N., De Vita G., Cuadrado A., and Nebreda A. R. (2007) p38α MAP kinase as a sensor of reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 11, 191–205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Mishra S., Dwivedi P. D., Pandey H. P., and Das M. (2014) Role of oxidative stress in deoxynivalenol-induced toxicity. Food Chem. Toxicol. 72, 20–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ren Z., Wang Y., Deng H., Deng Y., Deng J., Zuo Z., Wang Y., Peng X., Cui H., and Shen L. (2015) Deoxynivalenol induces apoptosis in chicken splenic lymphocytes via the reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial pathway. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39, 339–346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Del Regno M., Adesso S., Popolo A., Quaroni A., Autore G., Severino L., and Marzocco S. (2015) Nivalenol induces oxidative stress and increases deoxynivalenol pro-oxidant effect in intestinal epithelial cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 285, 118–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Yang H., Chung D. H., Kim Y. B., Choi Y. H., and Moon Y. (2008) Ribotoxic mycotoxin deoxynivalenol induces G2/M cell cycle arrest via p21Cip/WAF1 mRNA stabilization in human epithelial cells. Toxicology 243, 145–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Hirotsu Y., Katsuoka F., Funayama R., Nagashima T., Nishida Y., Nakayama K., Engel J. D., and Yamamoto M. (2012) Nrf2-MafG heterodimers contribute globally to antioxidant and metabolic networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 10228–10239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Slocum S. L., and Kensler T. W. (2011) Nrf2: control of sensitivity to carcinogens. Arch. Toxicol. 85, 273–284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Surh Y. J. (2003) Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 768–780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ishida Y., Kondo T., Kimura A., Matsushima K., and Mukaida N. (2006) Absence of IL-1 receptor antagonist impaired wound healing along with aberrant NF-κB activation and a reciprocal suppression of TGF-β signal pathway. J. Immunol. 176, 5598–5606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Egan L. J., de Lecea A., Lehrman E. D., Myhre G. M., Eckmann L., and Kagnoff M. F. (2003) Nuclear factor-κB activation promotes restitution of wounded intestinal epithelial monolayers. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 285, C1028–1035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Noiri E., Peresleni T., Srivastava N., Weber P., Bahou W. F., Peunova N., and Goligorsky M. S. (1996) Nitric oxide is necessary for a switch from stationary to locomoting phenotype in epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 270, C794–802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Cowan M. J., Coll T., and Shelhamer J. H. (2006) Polyamine-mediated reduction in human airway epithelial migration in response to wounding is PGE2 dependent through decreases in COX-2 and cPLA2 protein levels. J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 1127–1135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Fukata M., Michelsen K. S., Eri R., Thomas L. S., Hu B., Lukasek K., Nast C. C., Lechago J., Xu R., Naiki Y., Soliman A., Arditi M., and Abreu M. T. (2005) Toll-like receptor-4 is required for intestinal response to epithelial injury and limiting bacterial translocation in a murine model of acute colitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 288, G1055–1065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Moon Y., Yang H., and Park S. H. (2008) Hypo-responsiveness of interleukin-8 production in human embryonic epithelial intestine 407 cells independent of NF-κB pathway: new lessons from endotoxin and ribotoxic deoxynivalenol. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 231, 94–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Do K. H., Choi H. J., Kim J., Park S. H., Kim H. H., Oh C. G., and Moon Y. (2012) Ambivalent roles of early growth response 1 in inflammatory signaling following ribosomal insult in human enterocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 84, 513–521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Lee P., Peng H., Gelbart T., and Beutler E. (2004) The IL-6- and lipopolysaccharide-induced transcription of hepcidin in HFE-, transferrin receptor 2-, and β 2-microglobulin-deficient hepatocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 9263–9265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Messner D. J., and Kowdley K. V. (2010) Biting the iron bullet: endoplasmic reticulum stress adds the pain of hepcidin to chronic liver disease. Hepatology 51, 705–707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Vecchi C., Montosi G., Zhang K., Lamberti I., Duncan S. A., Kaufman R. J., and Pietrangelo A. (2009) ER stress controls iron metabolism through induction of hepcidin. Science 325, 877–880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Ross S. L., Tran L., Winters A., Lee K. J., Plewa C., Foltz I., King C., Miranda L. P., Allen J., Beckman H., Cooke K. S., Moody G., Sasu B. J., Nemeth E., Ganz T., et al. (2012) Molecular mechanism of hepcidin-mediated ferroportin internalization requires ferroportin lysines, not tyrosines or JAK-STAT. Cell Metab. 15, 905–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Collins J. F., Wessling-Resnick M., and Knutson M. D. (2008) Hepcidin regulation of iron transport. J. Nutr. 138, 2284–2288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Espinoza A., Le Blanc S., Olivares M., Pizarro F., Ruz M., and Arredondo M. (2012) Iron, copper, and zinc transport: inhibition of divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) and human copper transporter 1 (hCTR1) by shRNA. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 146, 281–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Au C., Benedetto A., and Aschner M. (2008) Manganese transport in eukaryotes: the role of DMT1. Neurotoxicology 29, 569–576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zheng G., Chen J., and Zheng W. (2012) Relative contribution of CTR1 and DMT1 in copper transport by the blood-CSF barrier: implication in manganese-induced neurotoxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 260, 285–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Chong W. S., Kwan P. C., Chan L. Y., Chiu P. Y., Cheung T. K., and Lau T. K. (2005) Expression of divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) isoforms in first trimester human placenta and embryonic tissues. Hum. Reprod. 20, 3532–3538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Tallkvist J., Bowlus C. L., and Lönnerdal B. (2003) Effect of iron treatment on nickel absorption and gene expression of the divalent metal transporter (DMT1) by human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 92, 121–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Brasse-Lagnel C., Karim Z., Letteron P., Bekri S., Bado A., and Beaumont C. (2011) Intestinal DMT1 cotransporter is down-regulated by hepcidin via proteasome internalization and degradation. Gastroenterology 140, 1261–1271.e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Yamaji S., Sharp P., Ramesh B., and Srai S. K. (2004) Inhibition of iron transport across human intestinal epithelial cells by hepcidin. Blood 104, 2178–2180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Anderson C. P., and Leibold E. A. (2014) Mechanisms of iron metabolism in Caenorhabditis elegans. Front. Pharmacol. 5, 113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Drakesmith H., and Prentice A. (2008) Viral infection and iron metabolism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 541–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Reuther J. Y., and Baldwin A. S. Jr. (1999) Apoptosis promotes a caspase-induced amino-terminal truncation of IκBα that functions as a stable inhibitor of NF-κB. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20664–20670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Riemer J., Hoepken H. H., Czerwinska H., Robinson S. R., and Dringen R. (2004) Colorimetric ferrozine-based assay for the quantitation of iron in cultured cells. Anal. Biochem. 331, 370–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Fish W. W. (1988) Rapid colorimetric micromethod for the quantitation of complexed iron in biological samples. Methods Enzymol. 158, 357–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES