Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1995 May;48(5):402–404. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.5.402

Have declining clinical necropsy rates reduced the contribution of necropsy to medical research?

R D Start 1, J A Firth 1, F Macgillivray 1, S S Cross 1
PMCID: PMC502611  PMID: 7629282

Abstract

AIMS--To examine trends in necropsy based research output for a period of 27 years during which there has been a progressive decline in clinical necropsy rates. METHODS--The numbers of necropsy based research papers published between 1966 and 1993 were determined using the CD-Plus Medline computed literature database. RESULTS--The number of necropsy based research papers containing necropsy or a synonym in the title increased by 220% between 1966 and 1993. When papers including necropsy or a synonym in the abstract, but not in the title, were included, the proportion of all indexed papers increased from 0.35% in 1975, when abstracts were first included, to 0.53% in 1993. Analysis of the subject material indicated that necropsy based research has constantly reflected trends and advances in clinical medicine. Neuroscience related research represented the largest subject category which may reflect the difficulties in obtaining human tissue from sources other than necropsy. CONCLUSIONS--The modern necropsy continues to provide valuable information for all clinical and laboratory based disciplines. The decline in clinical necropsy rates would not yet appear to have undermined the contribution of the necropsy to research.

Full text

PDF
402

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carter J. R., Nash N. P., Cechner R. L., Platt R. D. Proposal for a national autopsy data bank: a potential major contribution of pathologists to the health care of the nation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Oct;76(4 Suppl):597–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cross S. S., Macgillivray F. Has there been an information explosion in histopathology? J Clin Pathol. 1992 Aug;45(8):724–725. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.8.724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Friederici H. H. Reflections on the postmortem audit. JAMA. 1988 Dec 16;260(23):3461–3465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldman L., Sayson R., Robbins S., Cohn L. H., Bettmann M., Weisberg M. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med. 1983 Apr 28;308(17):1000–1005. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198304283081704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. King D. W. Potential of the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984 Jun;108(6):439–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller J. D., Starr L. Information explosion in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1988 Mar;39(1):33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peacock S. J., Machin D., Duboulay C. E., Kirkham N. The autopsy: a useful tool or an old relic? J Pathol. 1988 Sep;156(1):9–14. doi: 10.1002/path.1711560105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Reid W. A. Cost effectiveness of routine postmortem histology. J Clin Pathol. 1987 Apr;40(4):459–461. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.4.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reid W. A., Harkin P. J., Jack A. S. Continual audit of clinical diagnostic accuracy by computer: a study of 592 autopsy cases. J Pathol. 1987 Oct;153(2):99–107. doi: 10.1002/path.1711530203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roberts D. Information data bases. Lancet. 1990 Apr 14;335(8694):917–917. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90517-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Start R. D., McCulloch T. A., Benbow E. W., Lauder I., Underwood J. C. Clinical necropsy rates during the 1980s: the continued decline. J Pathol. 1993 Sep;171(1):63–66. doi: 10.1002/path.1711710113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Trump B. F., Mergner W. J., Jones R. T., Cowley R. A. The use and application of autopsy in research. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Feb;69(2 Suppl):230–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES