Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1995 May;48(5):420–423. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.5.420

Observer reliability in assessing placental maturity by histology.

T Y Khong 1, A Staples 1, R W Bendon 1, H M Chambers 1, S J Gould 1, S Knowles 1, S Shen-Schwarz 1
PMCID: PMC502616  PMID: 7629287

Abstract

AIMS--To evaluate the ability of five experienced perinatal pathologists to assess placental maturity reliably by histology. METHODS--Twenty four haematoxylin and eosin slides, six each from placentas of 27, 31, 35, and 39 weeks' gestation, were circulated to five pathologists on three separate occasions. The slides were labelled with the correct or incorrect gestational ages. RESULTS--The mean absolute error over all 360 readings was 2.72 weeks. Only 54% of the slides were assessed within two weeks of the correct gestation. Pathologist tended to overestimate younger gestations and underestimate older gestations. Two, and possibly three, pathologist were influenced by the gestational age state on the label. One pathologist, who did not appear to be influenced by the label, was more accurate in diagnosing gestation of the placentas than other colleagues. CONCLUSIONS--Experienced pathologists can have difficulty in assessing the villous maturity of placentas by histology. They can also be influenced by clinical information provided, such as gestational age. Other observer reliability studies must address the issue of the influence of labelled information on observer variation. A difference in maturation would have to be of a six week magnitude to have a chance of being detected by current methods. This may limit the value of the histological diagnosis of placental dysmaturity as a surrogate marker for uteroplacental ischaemia.

Full text

PDF
420

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arias F., Rodriquez L., Rayne S. C., Kraus F. T. Maternal placental vasculopathy and infection: two distinct subgroups among patients with preterm labor and preterm ruptured membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;168(2):585–591. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90499-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg A. T., Bracken M. B. Measuring gestational age: an uncertain proposition. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Apr;99(4):280–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13722.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bull A. D., Cross S. S., James D. S., Silcocks P. B. Do pathologists have extrasensory perception? BMJ. 1991 Dec 21;303(6817):1604–1605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6817.1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fox H. Villous immaturity in the term placenta. Obstet Gynecol. 1968 Jan;31(1):9–12. doi: 10.1097/00006250-196801000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Khong T. Y., Staples A., Moore L., Byard R. W. Observer reliability in assessing villitis of unknown aetiology. J Clin Pathol. 1993 Mar;46(3):208–210. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.3.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Naeye R. L. Functionally important disorders of the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal membranes. Hum Pathol. 1987 Jul;18(7):680–691. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(87)80239-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rayburn W., Sander C., Barr M., Jr, Rygiel R. The stillborn fetus: placental histologic examination in determining a cause. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 May;65(5):637–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schuhmann R. A., Wynn R. M. Regional ultrastructural differences in placental villi in cotyledons of a mature human placenta. Placenta. 1980 Oct-Dec;1(4):345–353. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(80)80036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. WIGGLESWORTH J. S. The Langhans layer in late pregnancy: a histological study of normal and abnormal cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1962 Jun;69:355–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1962.tb01162.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES