Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1995 May;48(5):443–446. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.5.443

Cytodiagnosis and the necropsy.

S K Suvarna 1, R D Start 1
PMCID: PMC502621  PMID: 7629291

Abstract

AIMS--To assess the efficacy of cytodiagnosis in necropsy practice. METHODS--Fifty three focal lesions from 46 necropsies were assessed by direct smears taken from the lesions. The smears were air-dried and stained by a modified Giemsa technique, with two cases having supplementary histochemistry. All of the slides were assessed independently before review of the necropsy histology. RESULTS--Of the 35 malignant neoplasms, 34 were correctly identified as malignant and 14 of these were characterised precisely. Three of the four benign neoplasms were recognised as neoplastic. One was characterised precisely. Three of the four infected cases revealed the relevant microorganisms. Seven of the other 10 focal non-neoplastic lesions were correctly diagnosed as non-neoplastic. Only two cases proved unsatisfactory for cytodiagnosis. CONCLUSIONS--Direct smear cytodiagnosis is quick, cheap and technically simple. Tissue autolysis may account for some difficulty in assessing particular tissues, but this should diminish with experience. Necropsy cytodiagnosis is applicable to all necropsies in all centres.

Full text

PDF
443

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DiBonito L., Falconieri G., Colautti I., Bonifacio D., Dudine S. The positive peritoneal effusion. A retrospective study of cytopathologic diagnoses with autopsy confirmation. Acta Cytol. 1993 Jul-Aug;37(4):483–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kao Y. S. A technic for bone marrow imprints from postmortem specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Jun;63(6):832–835. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/63.6.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McGarry P., Holmquist N. D., Anne Carmel Sister A postmortem study of cerebrospinal fluid with histologic correlation. Acta Cytol. 1969 Jan;13(1):48–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Suen K. C., Yermakov V., Raudales O. The use of imprint technic for rapid diagnosis in postmortem examinations. A diagnostically rewarding procedure. Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Mar;65(3):291–300. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/65.3.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Walker E., Going J. J. Cytopathology in the post mortem room. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Aug;47(8):714–717. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.8.714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Whitty P., Parker C., Prieto-Ramos F., al-Kharusi S. Communication of results of necropsies in north east Thames region. BMJ. 1991 Nov 16;303(6812):1244–1246. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6812.1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES