Abstract
The degree of heterogeneity among cancer stem cells (CSC) remains ill-defined and may hinder effective anti-CSC therapy. Evaluation of oral cancers for such heterogeneity identified two compartments within the CSC pool. One compartment was detected using a reporter for expression of the H3K4me3 demethylase JARID1B to isolate a JARID1Bhigh fraction of cells with stem cell-like function. JARID1Bhigh cells expressed oral CSC markers including CD44 and ALDH1 and showed increased PI3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation. They were distinguished from a fraction in a G0-like cell cycle state characterized by low reactive oxygen species and suppressed PI3K/AKT signaling. G0-like cells lacked conventional CSC markers but were primed to acquire stem cell-like function by upregulating JARID1B, which directly mediated transition to a state expressing known oral CSC markers. The transition was regulated by PI3K signals acting upstream of JARID1B expression, resulting in PI3K inhibition depleting JARID1Bhigh cells but expanding the G0-like subset. These findings define a novel developmental relationship between two cell phenotypes that may jointly contribute to CSC maintenance. Expansion of the G0-like subset during targeted depletion of JARID1Bhigh cells implicates it as a candidate therapeutic target within the oral CSC pool.
Keywords: oral cancer, cancer stem cells, squamous cell carcinoma, JARID1B, PI3K
INTRODUCTION
CSCs are defined by unlimited self-renewal and differentiation to states lacking growth potential. They have been isolated in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) using multiple markers including CD44 and ALDH1 (1–3) and express regulators of embryonic stem cells including Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, and Bmi-1 (4–6). However, epigenetic plasticity among CSCs may prevent assignment of a single discrete molecular profile. Such plasticity among adult epithelial stem cells gives rise to quiescent and proliferative subsets that interconvert to support tissue homeostasis and repair (7, 8). Thus, similar heterogeneity among oral CSCs may drive cancer progression and shape therapy responses.
Although quiescence is not an essential stem cell trait, it is commonly attributed to adult stem cells and CSCs, where it may underlie generalized resistance to therapies targeting proliferating cells. As such, quiescence is defined by exit from the cell cycle while retaining cell division potential. One approach to defining quiescent cancer cells uses Pyronin-Y staining to gate cells with low total RNA within the G0/G1 fraction. Such cells exhibit the high p27kip1 and low reactive oxygen species (ROS) of the G0 state (9, 10). A related breast cancer subpopulation was isolated based on low ROS and exhibits quiescent features including suppression of proliferation markers and increased Hes1 (11), an inhibitor of senescence and differentiation (12). Not meeting strict criteria for complete G0 exit, these “G0-like” cells downregulate PI3K-Akt signaling through proteasome-mediated Akt degradation (11, 13). The role of PI3K-Akt activation in allowing certain adult stem cells to exit quiescence (14) suggests the pathway might also permit G0-like cells to exert CSC function.
However, some molecular traits of G0-like cells diverge from those described for CSCs, making their relationship unclear. Specifically, PI3K activation observed in putative CSCs of various cancers renders them sensitive to PI3K inhibitors (15–18). Furthermore, the ROSlow feature of G0-like cells is incongruous with the high oxidative metabolism observed in melanoma CSCs that express increased levels of the H3K4me3 demethylase JARID1B (19). These JARID1Bhigh melanoma cells are slow-cycling (20) but are not known to express markers of quiescence. JARID1B, a transcriptional repressor, targets genes involved in diverse cellular processes including development, differentiation, and cell cycle (21–23). It is overexpressed in various cancers (23–25). In OSCC, JARID1B silencing is observed to attenuate sphere formation and stem cell marker expression (26). Additional findings have led to appreciation of JARID1B’s role in maintenance or differentiation of normal and malignant stem cell phenotypes (21, 27–29), suggesting broader utility as a CSC marker.
The unknown degree of identity between G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells led us to evaluate their function, overlap, and developmental relationship. Here we demonstrate that they are distinct subpopulations in OSCCs. Despite sharing stem cell-like function, only JARID1Bhigh cells displayed conventional CSC-associated markers, PI3K pathway activation, and PI3K inhibitor sensitivity. However, G0-like cells were primed to enter a JARID1Bhigh state and required JARID1B to exert stem cell-like function. Our results have implications for maintenance of a dynamic CSC pool and provide insight into adaptation of oral CSCs to PI3K inhibition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines, clinical specimens, vectors
Cells were maintained in 1:1 DMEM/F12 with 400ng/ml hydrocortisone, 10% FBS, and 50μg/ml gentimycin. SCC9 cells were obtained from ATCC. LNT14 cells are described (30). VU147T and CAL33 cells were gifts from Dr. Hans Joenje, VU Medical Center, Netherlands and Dr. Jennifer Grandis, University of Pittsburgh, respectively. Cell lines were authenticated using Identify Mapping Kit (Coriell, Camden, NJ). Clinical specimens were obtained under University of Pennsylvania IRB protocol #417200 or Philadelphia VA protocol #01090. Lentiviral vectors pLU-JARID1Bprom-EGFP-Blast, pLU-CMVprom-EGFP-Blast, and pLKO-shJARID1B (20), transient expression vector pBIND-RBP2H1 (JARID1B) (31), and retroviral vectors pWZ-neo-myrAKTΔ4-129-ER/A2myrAKTΔ4-129-ER (32, 33) are described.
Flow cytometry (FC) and tumor cell purification
Antibodies are in Supplementary Table S1. FC was performed using AstriosEQ (Beckman-Coulter, Miami, FL) or LSRII (BD, San Jose, CA) instruments. Minced tumors were disrupted in 1mg/ml collagenase-IV using gentleMACS Dissociator (Miltenyi, San Diego, CA). Suspensions were agitated at 37°C for 1 hour before repeating disruption and 40μm filtering. Mouse stromal cells were removed from xenografts by pretreating with anti-mouse CD16/32-Fc-Block and positive selection of human cells using anti-HLA-ABC. Mouse cell contamination was monitored using anti-mouse-H-2Kd. For human tissues, tumor cells were purified by negative selection with anti-CD45/CD31 as described (34). Dead cells were excluded by 7-AAD throughout.
Detection of G0-like cells, ROS, label retention, ALDH activity
Tumor cells at 106 cells/ml were incubated with 4μM Hoechst-33342 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) followed by 1μg/ml Pyronin-Y (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 37°C for 30 min. G0-like cells were FACS-purified by setting PyroninYlow gates within the G0/G1 peak of the Hoechst-33342 profile. To detect ROS, cells were incubated with 2.5μM H2DCFDA (Life Technologies) for 20 min at 37°C. PKH26/67 (Sigma-Aldrich) or CellTrace™ Violet (Life Technologies) were used per manufacturer instructions. 100% labeling was confirmed by FC; labeled cells were analyzed after 10 days of culture. Aldefluor assays were performed per manufacturer instructions (Stemcell, Vancouver, Canada).
Western blotting
Protein lysates were made from equal cell numbers using Laemmli buffer, separated on 10% ECL gels (GE, Pittsburgh, PA), and transferred to nitrocellulose using the Trans-Blot® System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Antibodies (Supplementary Table S1) were incubated at 4°C overnight. After washing, blots were incubated with anti-Rabbit/Mouse IgG-DyLight and analyzed using a LI-COR Odyssey System (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE).
G0-like cell detection in tissue
Paraffin-embedded samples were labeled using a multi-step tyramide-amplified protocol as described (35). Following antigen retrieval and serum-free protein block, each labeling cycle consisted of primary antibody (Supplementary Table S1), secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, and TSA conjugated to a fluorophore (FITC/CY3/CY5, Perkin Elmer, Inc). Images were acquired on a Nikon Ti confocal microscope (60X). Tumor cells were distinguished with pan-cytokeratin staining. G0-like cells were identified based on the following pattern: DAPI+/AKT1low/H3K9me2low/HES1high. Cells were counted in 10 random fields per section using Image J software. A blinded observer semi-quantitatively assessed ‘high’ or ‘low’ fluorescence relative to background from isotype controls. Signals were designated ‘high’ if the ratio of corrected total fluorescence was >2× compared to three ‘low’ cells in the same image.
Sphere formation
10 cells/well were cultured in ultralow attachment 96-well plates (Corning, Corning, NY) in serum-free complete MEGM (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) for 14 days. Spheres were counted and imaged using a Leica DM IRB inverted microscope and iVision software (Biovision, Chester Springs, PA). Spheres were propagated by Accutase® (Life Technologies) dissociation for 20 minutes and trypan blue dead cell exclusion before re-plating.
Mouse experiments
Non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient/interleukin-2 receptor γ-chain-deficient (NSG) mice were utilized under Wistar Institute IACUC protocols 112652/112655. Tumors were generated by subcutaneous flank injection of cells in 100μl Matrigel (Corning). Tumors for drug studies were grown from 106 cells to a volume of ~50mm3. GDC-0941 (SelleckChem, Houston, TX) in 0.5% methylcellulose/0.2% Tween80 was administered at 100mg/kg by daily oral gavage.
Real-time reverse transcription PCR and RNA-Seq
RNA was isolated using the Qiagen RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, PA). cDNA was generated from 1μg RNA using RNA-to-DNA (Life Technologies) and PCR purification (Qiagen) kits. Expression was quantified using Power SYBRgreen Master Mix and a Step-One Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies). Primers are in Supplementary Table S2. RNA-Seq was performed on LNT14 cell fractions from three independent FACS isolations. Multiplexed Illumina libraries were prepared using Illumina stranded mRNA kits, pooled, and sequenced to 100bp from one end of the insert. 236,908,957 aligning reads against the human genome (hg19) were detected using RUM v2.0.4. 215,252,518 uniquely-aligning reads were used to quantify transcripts. Differential expression was defined using EdgeR with a generalized linear model to account for donor linkage and detect inter-treatment differences. Multidimensional scaling plots confirmed significant donor effects. Differentially-expressed genes had FDR>10%. GSEA was performed using the MSigDB C2 v5.0 curated gene sets (>3000) to compare JARID1Bhigh, G0-like and bulk cells. A log2-fold change between paired conditions was used as a ranking variable.
Statistics and TIC-Frequency
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. At least three independent replicates were performed per experiment. ANOVA or t-tests evaluated differences among means. Tukey’s procedure tested pairwise differences for significant ANOVAs. An F-statistic tested for equal variances. For unequal variances, Welch’s ANOVA or t-statistics were used. Mann-Whitney U tests were used for variables lacking normal distribution. Differences between cumulative distributions for latency times were defined using Kaplan-Meier and exact log-rank tests. Tumor initiating cell (TIC) frequencies were estimated using ELDA software (http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda/) (36).
RESULTS
G0-like OSCC cells exhibit stem cell-like function
G0-like cells were identified by FC within multiple OSCC cell lines using Hoechst-33342 and Pyronin-Y to detect RNAlow cells within the G0/G1 cell cycle peak (Fig. 1A left, Supplementary Fig. S1A). H2DCFDA staining confirmed the fraction to be ROSlow (Fig. 1A right, Supplementary Fig. S1B left), consistent with the H2DCFDA-based definition of G0-like breast cancer cells (11). G0-like cells in cell lines showed high p27Kip1 and Hes1, along with decreased total Akt protein (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Fig. S1B right). Continued cyclin D1 expression implied a lack of complete G0 cell cycle exit, supporting the “G0-like” designation. Applying the Pyronin-Y-based isolation strategy to tumor cells purified from clinical specimens and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) also detected G0-like cells with low ROS and Akt (Supplementary Fig. S1C–D). Similar cells were stained by established methodology in sections of 9 human tumors and 2 derivative PDXs. Cells with the Hes1high/Aktlow/H3K9me2low staining profile of ROSlow G0-like breast cancer cells (11) were detectable as a minority fraction in most samples (Fig. 1C). G0-like fractions from cell lines were tested in clonal sphere assays, where they showed enhanced formation of primary spheres and propagation as secondary spheres (Fig. 1D). They also formed tumors at higher incidence and shorter latency than the non-G0-like fraction upon xenotransplantation at low cell dose (Fig. 1E left). G0-like cells isolated from PDXs also had enhanced tumor-initiating capacity, forming tumors with similar efficiency to CD44high cells (Fig. 1F top) despite being CD44low (bottom, Supplementary Fig. S1E). Together, these results established that G0-like OSCC cells can display CSC function. Clinico-pathologic traits for patient tumors, along with their derivative PDXs and cell lines, are in Supplementary Table S3.
Figure 1. G0-like cells exhibit stem cell-like function.
A, FC plot illustrates G0-like gate in representative LNT14 cell line (left). H2DCFDA profiles compare G0-like to non-G0-like fractions in OSCC lines (right). *p<0.001,**p<0.0001. B, Western blots (WBs) of G0-like and unfractionated (total) cells from OSCC lines. C, Confocal IF of patient tumor and derivative PDX stained for H3K9me2 (yellow), Hes1 (red), pan-Akt (green), and DAPI (blue). Arrows indicate G0-like cells (H3K9me2low/HES1high/pan-AKTlow) (left, Bar=10μm). Staining quantifies G0-like cells in 9 patient tumors (right). D, Primary and secondary sphere-formation by G0-like vs. non-G0-like fractions of OSCC lines. *p<0.05,**p<0.0001. E, Xenograft growth of G0-like vs.non-G0-like fractions from cell lines LNT14 (100 cells/mouse, n=6/group) and VU147T (1000 cells/mouse, n=6/group). *p<0.025,**p<0.0025. F, Xenograft growth (top) and cell surface CD44 (bottom) from G0-like, CD44high, and bulk fractions of OCTT2 PDX (2000 cells/mouse, n=4/group). Latency for G0-like and CD44high cells were shorter than for bulk cells (p<0.025).
JARID1B is a distinct basis for detecting CSC function
The quiescent and stem cell-like traits of G0-like cells appeared comparable to those of melanoma cells expressing high JARID1B (20). To assess JARID1B’s role in the oral CSC pool, a promoter-based reporter for JARID1B transcription, J1BpromEGFP (20), was stably expressed in OSCC cell lines. LNT14 and SCC9 cells with 5% highest EGFP expressed increased JARID1B mRNA and protein (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 2A) and were designated JARID1Bhigh. All subsequent studies were standardized to assess changes in JARID1Bhigh population size relative to this 5% EGFPhigh reference gate in control cells. The label retention and CSC function previously seen in a JARID1Bhigh state defined identically for melanoma (20) were evaluated in OSCC. Fluorescent membrane labelling showed that, in contrast to the G0-like fraction, JARID1Bhigh OSCC cells were highly label-retaining over 10 days, indicating low-turnover (Supplementary Fig. S2B). However, JARID1Bhigh cells were distributed outside the G0-like gate instead showing G2M expansion (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. S2C–D), suggesting slowed G2M transit over G0-like arrest. Decreased JARID1B reporter function and protein in the G0-like gate (Supplementary Fig. S2E) distinguished the two states beyond cell cycle status, raising the possibility that JARID1Bhigh and G0-like cells are distinct subpopulations. Thus, subsequent studies standardized comparison of mutually exclusive G0-like and JARID1Bhigh gates to a “bulk” gate that excludes both subsets (Supplementary Fig. S3A).
Figure 2. JARID1B is a distinct basis for detecting CSC function.
A, Standardized 5% JARID1Bhigh reference gate illustrated in LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells (left). JARID1B expression in the EGFPhigh fraction of LNT14_J1BpromEGFP or control LNT14_CMVpromEGFP cells by QRT-PCR (middle *p<0.025). JARID1B protein in JARID1Bhigh cells by WB (left, values indicate JARID1B normalized to loading control). B, Pyronin-Y/Hoechst-33342 plots distinguish cell cycle profiles of G0-like and JARID1Bhigh fractions. *p<0.0005. C, Profiles show JARID1Bhigh fraction size in spheres of LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells based on the 5% reference gate set in monolayer culture. *p<0.01. D, Primary and secondary sphere-formation by JARID1Bhigh vs. total cells. *p<0.0005,**p<0.0001. E, Xenograft formation by G0-like, JARID1Bhigh, or bulk LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells (100 cells/mouse, n=6/group). *p<0.05,**p<0.0025. F, Localization of JARID1Bhigh cellsto the top 10% CD44high fraction in cell lines (left) was quantified (right). *p<0.05,**p<0.005. G, Localization of JARID1Bhigh PDX cells to the top 10% CD44high fraction (left) and JARID1B expression by FC in this CD44high fraction (right), determined by intracellular JARID1B IF after surface CD44 staining.
In functional analyses, JARID1Bhigh cells defined by the 5% reference gate in monolayer culture increased in clonal spheres (Fig. 2C, Supplementary Fig. S3B) and showed higher primary and secondary sphere-forming capacity (Fig. 2D). JARID1Bhigh cells from two lines formed xenografts with comparable efficiency to G0-like cells but higher incidence and shorter latency than bulk cells, with all fractions producing tumors with indistinguishable histology (Fig. 2E, Supplementary Fig. S3C–D). Limiting dilution showed JARID1Bhigh LNT14 cells to form 100% tumors even at a dose of 10 cells and the G0-like subset to have markedly higher TIC frequency than bulk cells (Supplementary Fig. S3E). Reliance on a reporter to purify JARID1Bhigh cells prevented their direct isolation from PDXs for functional testing. However, their overlap with the CD44high fraction by was supported by FC analysis of cell lines and PDX tumors (Fig. 2F–G left, Supplementary Fig. S3F top) and detection of elevated JARID1B expression in CD44high PDX cells (2G right, Supplementary Fig. S3F bottom). Together, these data suggested that JARID1Bhigh and G0-like cells are subpopulations with distinct molecular characteristics but similar stem cell-like function.
JARID1Bhigh and G0-like cells show divergent molecular profiles and PI3K signaling
Shared stem cell-like function between G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells despite divergent CD44 expression justified further molecular comparisons. Only JARID1Bhigh cells increased expression of the pluripotency-related factors Oct4 and Bmi1 (Fig. 3A) and another oral CSC marker ALDH1A1 (Fig. 3B left), the isoform underlying increased ALDH activity in OSCC (37). High ALDH activity in Aldefluor assays also corresponded with high levels of JARID1B (Fig 3B right). Broader comparison of G0-like, JARID1Bhigh, and bulk cells was performed by mRNA sequencing. Pairwise comparison of G0-like versus JARID1Bhigh subsets to bulk cells revealed 61 genes upregulated by both subsets (Fig. 3C, Supplementary Table S4–S7), including most transcripts increased in G0-like cells. This significant overlap suggested a close relationship between the two states; however, minimal overlap existed between genes downregulated by G0-like versus JARID1Bhigh cells (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Hierarchical clustering of gene-scaled expression levels confirmed that G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells clustered more closely to each other than to bulk cells (Supplementary Fig. S4B). Among the gene sets most significantly upregulated in G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells (Supplementary Tables S8–S10) were signatures defined in mammary and stromal stem cells (38, 39) (Fig 3D left, Supplementary Fig. S4C left), consistent with their shared CSC function. Notably, these gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) profiles were more prominent in JARID1Bhigh over G0-like cells (Fig. 3D right, Supplementary Fig. S4C right). JARID1Bhigh cells also more strongly upregulated an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition profile from breast CSCs (40) (Fig 3E left). These findings reveal distinctions between G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells despite shared expression of a core gene set, with JARID1Bhigh cells consistently exhibiting a more conventional CSC-related profile.
Figure 3. JARID1Bhigh and G0-like cells exhibit divergent molecular profiles and PI3K signaling.
A, WBs for indicated markers in G0-like, JARID1Bhigh, and bulk LNT14 cells. B, QRT-PCR for ALDH1A1 in G0-like, JARID1Bhigh, and bulk LNT14 cells (left) and JARID1B in Aldefluor+ vs. Aldefluor- cells. *p<0.05,**p<0.001. C, Genes upregulated relative to bulk in G0-like and JARID1Bhigh LNT14 cells. D, GSEAs show the Lim_Mammary_Stem_Cell_Up gene set for the indicated pairwise comparisons. ES=enrichment score, FDR=false discovery rate. E, GSEAs for Sarrio_Epithelial_Mesenchymal_Transition_Up (left) and Reactome_Cell_Cycle (right) gene sets in G0-like vs. JARID1Bhigh LNT14 cells. F, WBs of JARID1Bhigh vs. total cells.
Further analyses dissected the proliferative states of the subsets. Despite JARID1Bhigh cells retaining label, only G0-like cells downregulated cell cycle-related gene transcription based on a Reactome database gene set (Fig. 3E right, Supplementary Fig. S4D). To further characterize this difference, proliferative oncogenic signals were compared across cell fractions. No differences were evident in MAPK or JAK/STAT signaling based on ERK and STAT3 phosphorylation, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S4E). The reduced PI3K activity anticipated in G0-like cells based on low total AKT was confirmed at the level of phospho-AKT (Supplementary Fig. S2E, S4F). However, high phosphorylation of Akt and downstream target GSK3β indicated pathway hyper-activation in JARID1Bhigh cells relative to bulk (Fig. 3F, Supplemental Fig. S2E), adding to parallels between JARID1Bhigh cells and other CSC phenotypes (15–18). By contrast, AKT suppression in G0-like cells suggested a distinct role in the CSC pool.
G0-like cells are primed to become JARID1Bhigh
The functional properties shared by G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells prompted assessment of whether G0-like CSC function arises from transition to a JARID1Bhigh state. The capacity of G0-like versus bulk cells to upregulate JARID1B was tested by FACS-purification and re-culturing. G0-like cells reconstituted the original JARID1Bhigh fraction by day 4, while bulk cells failed to do so fully over 14 days (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Fig. S5A). However, despite their higher capacity to become JARID1Bhigh, purified G0-like cells proliferated comparably to bulk cells (Supplementary Fig. S5B). Thus, we tested whether G0-like cells must return to rapid proliferation before becoming JARID1Bhigh or can transition directly. Comparison of cultures grown from purified G0-like versus bulk cells labeled with CellTrace revealed two-fold more cells retaining label among JARID1Bhigh cells arising from the G0-like subset (Fig. 4B). A proximate relationship between the G0-like and JARID1Bhigh states was further supported by efficient G0-like to JARID1Bhigh transition observed during sphere formation, where G0-like cells generated spheres containing more JARID1Bhigh cells than bulk spheres (Fig. 4C). Here JARID1B upregulation by G0-like cells was reflected by appearance of a second EGFP peak in a bimodal distribution, which was absent or less prominent in bulk-derived spheres (Fig. 4D). Together, these data support a developmental relationship in which G0-like cells are primed to become JARID1Bhigh.
Figure 4. G0-like cells are primed to become JARID1Bhigh.
A, Histograms illustrate JARID1Bhigh gate in purified G0-like, bulk, and total LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells on culture day 0, 4, and 7. Arrow highlights G0-like cells shifting to the JARID1Bhigh fraction. Quantification below. *p<0.0025,**p<0.0001, n.s. not significant. B, CellTrace label-retention by JARID1Bhigh fraction arising from G0-like vs. bulk cells after 10 days culture. *p<0.0025 C, JARID1Bhigh cell content in spheres generated from G0-like vs. bulk LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells. *p<0.0001. D, EGFP fluorescence within spheres from G0-like, JARID1Bhigh, and bulk LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells. Gates define the more intense fluorescence peak.
G0-like cells exert CSC function by a JARID1B-dependent mechanism
The priming of G0-like cells to become JARID1Bhigh led to testing whether JARID1B directly contributes to the transition. When JARID1B was reduced using an shRNA of established specificity (20) (Fig. 5A, Supplementary Fig. S5C), LNT14 cells in the G0-like gate after JARID1B knockdown retained low ROS and AKT (Supplementary Fig. S5D). However, their sphere-forming capacity decreased to that of bulk cells, whose function was unaltered by shRNA (Fig. 5B, Supplementary Fig. S5E), and tumorigenesis by G0-like cells diminished to the incidence and latency of bulk cells (Fig. 5C). These results could arise from reduced JARID1B preventing acquisition of oral CSC markers or from impairment of subsequent CSC function. The former was supported by accumulation of G0-like cells upon JARID1B silencing (Fig. 5D, Supplementary Fig. S5F). Under silencing conditions, the 5% EGFPhigh cells, which are expected to maintain high JARID1B transcription, were similar in frequency to control EGFPhigh (i.e. JARID1Bhigh) cells but lacked high JARID1B mRNA (Supplementary Fig. S5G). Such JARID1B-silenced EGFPhigh cells showed decreased sphere-formation (Fig. 5E left, Supplementary Fig. S5E) and lower Oct4 and Bmi1 (Fig. 5E right), supporting JARID1B’s direct role in acquisition of CSC markers and function. This finding agreed with marker and functional shifts observed during JARID1B knockdown or over-expression. Specifically, knockdown decreased surface CD44, ALDH1A1 mRNA, and ALDH activity (Fig. 5F, Supplementary Fig. S5H), while over-expression increased CD44 and ALDH1A1 coordinately with sphere-formation (Fig. 5G). In sum, these results indicate that JARID1B contributes to the function of G0-like cells by driving them toward the JARID1Bhigh molecular profile.
Figure 5. G0-like cells exert CSC function by a JARID1B-dependent mechanism.
A, JARID1B by QRT-PCR and WB (inset) in LNT14 cells expressing scramble (scr) or JARID1B (sh) shRNA. *p<5×10−5. B, Primary and secondary spheres from G0-like and bulk LNT14 cells expressing sh vs. scr. *p<0.0005,**0.0001. C, Xenograft formation by G0-like or bulk fractions from sh vs. scr LNT14 cells (100 cells/mouse, n=6/group). *p<0.025. D, G0-like fraction size in two sh vs. scr cell lines. *p<0.025. E, Sphere formation (left) and Oct4/BMI1 WB (right) for EGFPhigh and total fractions in sh or scr LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells. Band densities are normalized to GAPDH. *p<0.0001. F, CD44 by FC and ALDH1A1 by QRT-PCR in sh vs. scr LNT14 cells. *p<0.0001. G, CD44 and ALDH1A1 in LNT14 cells after JARID1B cDNA or mock transfection (left). Sphere formation by transfected cells (right) *p<0.05,**p<0.025,***p<0.0005.
PI3-kinase signals regulate the G0-like to JARID1Bhigh transition
Although JARID1B silencing blocked CSC marker acquisition, global pAKT levels were unaltered (Fig. 6A left) and AKT hyper-activation in EGFPhigh cells was maintained (right). This result suggested that PI3K signals act proximal to JARID1B to drive the transition. To test this possibility, AKT was activated in LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells carrying a myristoylated Akt variant fused to an estrogen receptor domain (myrAktER) that blocks activation in absence of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) (Supplementary Fig. S6A) (32). Addition of 4-OHT expanded JARID1Bhigh cells (Fig. 6B), supporting PI3K signaling driving entry into this state. Likewise, PI3K inhibition in vitro with LY294002 at a ~25% growth-inhibitory dose with minimal cytotoxicity (Supplementary Fig. S6B) decreased both the JARID1Bhigh fraction (Fig. 6C left, Supplementary Fig. S6C left) and JARID1B protein (Fig. 6C right). By contrast, the G0-like fraction markedly expanded upon treatment with LY294002 or the clinical pan-PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 (Fig. 6D, Supplementary Fig. S6C right) at doses producing modest growth inhibition (Supplementary Fig. S6B). G0-like cells isolated after GDC-0941 treatment retained sphere-forming capacity (Fig. 6E left) and tumorigenicity (right), providing evidence of their PI3K inhibitor resistance. Xenografts established from LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells were also treated in vivo with GDC-0941 at growth inhibitory doses (Fig. 6F left). Analysis of disaggregated residual tumors revealed no JARID1Bhigh cell enrichment and a trend toward their decreased percentage (Fig. 6F middle). Concurrently, there was greater than two-fold expansion of G0-like cells (right). Expanded G0-like subsets in treated tumors were verified by quantification of Hes1high/Aktlow/H3K9me2low cells in tumor sections (Fig. 6G). In sum, our findings support a model in which PI3K-dependent JARID1B upregulation drives the G0-like to JARID1Bhigh state transition (Fig. 7). Therapeutic PI3K inhibition is therefore predicted to expand the G0-like compartment while depleting JARID1Bhigh cells.
Figure 6. PI3-kinase signals regulate the G0-like to JARID1Bhigh transition.
A, Akt and pAkt by WB in sh vs. scr LNT14 cells (left) and EGFPhigh vs. total LNT14_J1BpromEGFP_shJARID1B cells (right). B, JARID1Bhigh fraction size in LNT14_J1BpromEGFP_myrAktER cells treated with 10nM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) for 72 hours. *p<0.0001. C, LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells treated with 10μM LY294002 for 72 hours were analyzed for EGFP (left) and JARID1B by WB (right). *p<0.01. D, G0-like cell content after LY294002 or 250 nM GDC-0941 treatment. *p<0.01,**p<0.0001 E, G0-like and bulk LNT14_J1BpromEGFP cells purified after 72 hours GDC-0941 (GDC) treatment were analyzed for sphere (left) and xenograft (right, 100 cells/mouse, n=6/group) formation. *p<0.05. F, LNT14_J1BpromEGFP xenograft growth during GDC treatment (left, n=5/group). Tumors were analyzed for JARID1Bhigh cells (middle) and G0-like cells (right). *p<0.025. G, Confocal IF of tumor sections from GDC- or vehicle-treated mice were stained as in Fig. 1E. Arrows indicate G0-like cells (H3K9me2low/HES1high/pan-AKTlow) (left), which were quantified for GDC vs. vehicle groups (right, n=4 tumors/group). *p<0.05.
Figure 7. Model of G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells as related subsets of the oral CSC pool.
G0-like cells exert stem cell-like function by PI3K-mediated entry to a JARID1Bhigh state. They are shown arising from rapid-cycling cells based on prior work (11). Dotted arrows represent transitions potentially impacting CSC homeostasis that are not addressed here.
DISCUSSION
A potential barrier to CSC-directed therapy arises from evidence that some cells lacking CSC markers retain stem cell-like functional capacity (20, 41, 42). Here we show that a G0-like subset lacking standard oral CSC markers is primed for stem cell-like function through transition into a state expressing such markers. The transition was mediated by PI3K-dependent upregulation of the histone demethylase JARID1B. Regulation of a heterogeneous CSC pool by this mechanism may provide a novel basis for its homeostasis during therapy.
By establishing JARID1B’s function in mediating the CSC potential of G0-like cells, our results expand understanding of its context-specific roles in malignant and normal stem cell homeostasis. JARID1B promotes either maintenance or differentiation of various normal stem cell populations (29, 43) at least partly through silencing lineage specification gene promoters (21, 44). In malignancy, increased JARID1B expression or amplification occur in multiple tumor types (23–25). Its oncogenic function is best characterized in breast cancer, where overexpression drives a luminal cell-specific expression program (23). By contrast, JARID1B is not overexpressed in melanomas but still underlies the function of a subset of JARID1Bhigh cells with a role in tumor maintenance and drug resistance (19, 20). Because JARID1B protein is widely detectable in OSCCs (26), CSC function associated with the rare JARID1Bhigh cells studied here may occur through dose-dependent effects on a subset of JARID1B-regulated genes. This gene regulation is also likely impacted by JARID1B’s known interactions with other transcriptional and epigenetic regulators that vary based on cellular context (25, 45–47).
Including G0-like cells in the CSC pool in our model (Fig. 7) emphasizes their potential for stem cell-like function. G0-like cells have been shown to arise from asymmetric division of rapidly-cycling cells as a stochastic event (11, 13). This event was mediated by a novel integrin-regulated signaling cascade leading to proteasomal Akt1 degradation via E3 ubiquitin ligase TTC3 (13) and may allow them to serve as an intermediate for transition to the JARID1Bhigh state. Although PI3K activation was observed here to drive this transition, it is unclear what signals initiate it or if additional pathways permit G0-like cells to return to rapid proliferation without a JARID1Bhigh intermediate. Detailing such mechanisms may offer approaches to addressing G0-like cells as a potential basis for innate therapy resistance.
The dichotomous PI3K activation in G0-like versus JARID1Bhigh cells offers insight into the pathway’s role in homeostasis of the oral CSC pool and its adaptation to PI3K inhibition. Putative CSCs in multiple tumor types exhibit PI3K hyper-activation and small molecule inhibitor sensitivity (15–18). Our similar finding in JARID1Bhigh OSCC cells is particularly relevant given the frequent driving PI3K pathway alterations in OSCC (48), which include isolated PIK3CA mutations for some HPV-positive tumors (49). Our results suggest that G0-like cells may be a reservoir that replenishes the JARID1Bhigh CSC state upon depletion by PI3K inhibition. Such effects may explain why PI3K pathway inhibitors generally produce modest clinical responses, despite the predicted sensitivity of the CSC pool. In this context, G0-like cells may play a role in therapy resistance parallel to that of reserve stem cells recruited during injury responses in normal epithelia. For example, loss of proliferative Lgr5-positive intestinal stem cells through injury leads to their regeneration by quiescent Bmi1-positive cells that have limited roles in normal homeostasis (50). Similar plasticity among quiescent and proliferative adult stem cells is seen in multiple tissue types (7, 8) and likely is maintained and exploited by solid tumors.
Although absence of rapid proliferation in G0-like and JARID1Bhigh cells may confer drug resistance to both subsets, their divergent PI3K activation and cell cycle states suggest a need for differing targeting strategies. One approach may be to block entry into the G0-like state in combination with PI3K inhibition. In addition to addressing mechanisms regulating the G0-like pool, further work is needed to test how molecular alterations in the PI3K pathway impact the size of G0-like versus JARID1Bhigh subsets and their dynamics in response to PI3K inhibition. Likewise, studies are needed to test how the oral CSC pool is regulated by individual downstream components of the PI3K pathway. Together, such work may facilitate combination therapies to deplete all cell phenotypes cooperatively sustaining the oral CSC pool.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding: This work is supported by NIH K08-DE022842(D Basu), R21-DE024396(D Basu, H Nakagawa, P Gimotty, M Herlyn), R01-CA185086(S Ramaswamy), P01-CA098101(D Basu, P Gimotty, H Nakagawa, AK Rustgi), K26-RR032714(H Nakagawa), K01-DK103953 and F32-CA174176(K Whelan), F32-DE024685(N Facompre), P30-DK050306(Core Facilities), Instituto de Salud Carlos III BA12/00021(X Sole), Trio/ACS, VA CPPF awards(D Basu).
We thank Christopher Lengner, PhD for review of this manuscript and the Wistar Flow Cytometry Facility for technical support.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.
References
- 1.Prince ME, Sivanandan R, Kaczorowski A, et al. Identification of a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell properties in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(3):973–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610117104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clay MR, Tabor M, Owen JH, et al. Single-marker identification of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cancer stem cells with aldehyde dehydrogenase. Head Neck. 2010;32(9):1195–201. doi: 10.1002/hed.21315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Facompre N, Nakagawa H, Herlyn M, Basu D. Stem-like cells and therapy resistance in squamous cell carcinomas. Adv Pharmacol. 2012;65:235–65. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397927-8.00008-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chiou SH, Yu CC, Huang CY, et al. Positive correlations of oct-4 and nanog in oral cancer stem-like cells and high-grade oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(13):4085–95. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chien CS, Wang ML, Chu PY, et al. Lin28B/let-7 regulates expression of Oct4 and Sox2 and reprograms oral squamous cell carcinoma cells to a stem-like state. Cancer Res. 2015;75(12):2553–65. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He Q, Liu Z, Zhao T, Zhao L, Zhou X, Wang A. Bmi1 drives stem-like properties and is associated with migration, invasion, and poor prognosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11(1):1–10. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.10405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li L, Clevers H. Coexistence of quiescent and active adult stem cells in mammals. Science. 2010;327(5965):542–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1180794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blanpain C, Fuchs E. Epidermal homeostasis: A balancing act of stem cells in the skin. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(3):207–17. doi: 10.1038/nrm2636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Deng X, Ewton DZ, Friedman E. Mirk/Dyrk1B maintains the viability of quiescent pancreatic cancer cells by reducing levels of reactive oxygen species. Cancer Res. 2009;69(8):3317–24. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jin K, Ewton DZ, Park S, Hu J, Friedman E. Mirk regulates the exit of colon cancer cells from quiescence. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(34):22916–25. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.035519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dey-Guha I, Wolfer A, Yeh AC, et al. Asymmetric cancer cell division regulated by AKT. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(31):12845–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109632108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sang L, Roberts JM, Coller HA. Hijacking HES1: How tumors co-opt the anti-differentiation strategies of quiescent cells. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16(1):17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dey-Guha I, Alves CP, Yeh AC, et al. A mechanism for asymmetric cell division resulting in proliferative asynchronicity. Mol Cancer Res. 2015;13(2):223–30. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lechman ER, Gentner B, van Galen P, et al. Attenuation of miR-126 activity expands HSC in vivo without exhaustion. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11(6):799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma S, Lee TK, Zheng BJ, Chan KW, Guan XY. CD133+ HCC cancer stem cells confer chemoresistance by preferential expression of the akt/PKB survival pathway. Oncogene. 2008;27(12):1749–58. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kolev VN, Wright QG, Vidal CM, et al. PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor VS-5584 preferentially targets cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2015;75(2):446–55. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dubrovska A, Kim S, Salamone RJ, et al. The role of PTEN/akt/PI3K signaling in the maintenance and viability of prostate cancer stem-like cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(1):268–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810956106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hardt O, Wild S, Oerlecke I, et al. Highly sensitive profiling of CD44+/CD24− breast cancer stem cells by combining global mRNA amplification and next generation sequencing: Evidence for a hyperactive PI3K pathway. Cancer Lett. 2012;325(2):165–74. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roesch A, Vultur A, Bogeski I, et al. Overcoming intrinsic multidrug resistance in melanoma by blocking the mitochondrial respiratory chain of slow-cycling JARID1B(high) cells. Cancer Cell. 2013;23(6):811–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roesch A, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Schmidt EC, et al. A temporarily distinct subpopulation of slow-cycling melanoma cells is required for continuous tumor growth. Cell. 2010;141(4):583–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schmitz SU, Albert M, Malatesta M, et al. Jarid1b targets genes regulating development and is involved in neural differentiation. EMBO J. 2011;30(22):4586–600. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Scibetta AG, Santangelo S, Coleman J, et al. Functional analysis of the transcription repressor PLU-1/JARID1B. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(20):7220–35. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00274-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yamamoto S, Wu Z, Russnes HG, et al. JARID1B is a luminal lineage-driving oncogene in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(6):762–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang Z, Tang F, Qi G, et al. KDM5B is overexpressed in gastric cancer and is required for gastric cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Am J Cancer Res. 2014;5(1):87–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xiang Y, Zhu Z, Han G, et al. JARID1B is a histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase up-regulated in prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(49):19226–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700735104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lin CS, Lin YC, Adebayo BO, et al. Silencing JARID1B suppresses oncogenicity, stemness and increases radiation sensitivity in human oral carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cellot S, Hope KJ, Chagraoui J, et al. RNAi screen identifies Jarid1b as a major regulator of mouse HSC activity. Blood. 2013;122(9):1545–55. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-496281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kuo YT, Liu YL, Adebayo BO, et al. JARID1B expression plays a critical role in chemoresistance and stem cell-like phenotype of neuroblastoma cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stewart MH, Albert M, Sroczynska P, et al. The histone demethylase Jarid1b is required for hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal in mice. Blood. 2015;125(13):2075–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-08-596734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Basu D, Bewley AF, Sperry SM, et al. EGFR inhibition promotes an aggressive invasion pattern mediated by mesenchymal-like tumor cells within squamous cell carcinomas. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(10):2176–86. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Roesch A, Mueller AM, Stempfl T, Moehle C, Landthaler M, Vogt T. RBP2-H1/JARID1B is a transcriptional regulator with a tumor suppressive potential in melanoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(5):1047–57. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kohn AD, Takeuchi F, Roth RA. Akt, a pleckstrin homology domain containing kinase, is activated primarily by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(36):21920–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.36.21920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oyama K, Okawa T, Nakagawa H, et al. AKT induces senescence in primary esophageal epithelial cells but is permissive for differentiation as revealed in organotypic culture. Oncogene. 2007;26(16):2353–64. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Judd NP, Winkler AE, Murillo-Sauca O, et al. ERK1/2 regulation of CD44 modulates oral cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Res. 2012;72(1):365–74. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Feng Z, Puri S, Moudgil T, et al. Multispectral imaging of formalin-fixed tissue predicts ability to generate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from melanoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3 doi: 10.1186/s40425-015-0091-z. 47,015-0091-z. eCollection 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hu Y, Smyth GK. ELDA: Extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays. J Immunol Methods. 2009;347(1–2):70–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Visus C, Ito D, Amoscato A, et al. Identification of human aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A1 as a novel CD8+ T-cell-defined tumor antigen in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 2007;67(21):10538–45. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lim E, Wu D, Pal B, et al. Transcriptome analyses of mouse and human mammary cell subpopulations reveal multiple conserved genes and pathways. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(2):R21. doi: 10.1186/bcr2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Boquest AC, Shahdadfar A, Fronsdal K, et al. Isolation and transcription profiling of purified uncultured human stromal stem cells: Alteration of gene expression after in vitro cell culture. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(3):1131–41. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sarrio D, Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Hardisson D, Cano A, Moreno-Bueno G, Palacios J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer relates to the basal-like phenotype. Cancer Res. 2008;68(4):989–97. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gupta PB, Fillmore CM, Jiang G, et al. Stochastic state transitions give rise to phenotypic equilibrium in populations of cancer cells. Cell. 2011;146(4):633–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chaffer CL, Marjanovic ND, Lee T, et al. Poised chromatin at the ZEB1 promoter enables breast cancer cell plasticity and enhances tumorigenicity. Cell. 2013;154(1):61–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kidder BL, Hu G, Yu ZX, Liu C, Zhao K. Extended self-renewal and accelerated reprogramming in the absence of kdm5b. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(24):4793–810. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00692-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dey BK, Stalker L, Schnerch A, Bhatia M, Taylor-Papidimitriou J, Wynder C. The histone demethylase KDM5b/JARID1b plays a role in cell fate decisions by blocking terminal differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(17):5312–27. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00128-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wong PP, Miranda F, Chan KV, Berlato C, Hurst HC, Scibetta AG. Histone demethylase KDM5B collaborates with TFAP2C and myc to repress the cell cycle inhibitor p21(cip) (CDKN1A) Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32(9):1633–44. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06373-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang Y, Liang J, Li Q. Coordinated regulation of retinoic acid signaling pathway by KDM5B and polycomb repressive complex 2. J Cell Biochem. 2014;115(9):1528–38. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Barrett A, Santangelo S, Tan K, et al. Breast cancer associated transcriptional repressor PLU-1/JARID1B interacts directly with histone deacetylases. Int J Cancer. 2007;121(2):265–75. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lui VW, Hedberg ML, Li H, et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):761–9. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Seiwert TY, Zuo Z, Keck MK, et al. Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(3):632–41. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tian H, Biehs B, Warming S, et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature. 2011;478(7368):255–9. doi: 10.1038/nature10408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







