Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1995 Jun;48(6):568–570. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.6.568

Enteric media: pre-poured or in-house?

C A Persaud 1, S J Eykyn 1
PMCID: PMC502691  PMID: 7665703

Abstract

AIMS--(1) To evaluate the performance of in-house and pre-poured commercially available enteric agar by challenge with a large number of positive clinical specimens. (2) To set the standard (critical independent evaluation) which new products should reach. (3) To publish this information, so that others can make informed decisions about enteric media. METHODS--Thirteen media of anonymous source were challenged with "known" positive stool samples. RESULTS--In-house desoxycholate citrate agar performed best for overall pathogen isolation rates, for shigella isolation rates, and for most pathogens available on primary culture. CONCLUSIONS--Desoxycholate citrate agar made by our own laboratory yielded the most pathogens and proved the most effective.

Full text

PDF
568

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gruenewald R., Henderson R. W., Yappow S. Use of Rambach Propylene Glycol Containing Agar for identification of Salmonella spp. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2354–2356. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2354-2356.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Persaud C. A., Eykyn S. J. Stool culture: are you getting value for money? J Clin Pathol. 1994 Sep;47(9):790–792. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.9.790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES