SYNOPSIS
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation, diagnosis, and triage of patients with TBI. Recent studies suggest that it will also help predict patient outcomes. TBI consists of multiple pathoanatomical entities. Here we review the current state of TBI imaging including its indications, benefits and limitations of the modalities, imaging protocols, and imaging findings for each these pathoanatomic entities. We also briefly survey advanced imaging techniques, which include a number of promising areas of TBI research.
Keywords: Traumatic Brain Injury, TBI, Imaging, MRI, CT
INTRODUCTION
In the United States, traumatic brain injury (TBI) is estimated to affect 1.7 million people annually, leading to approximately 52,000 deaths and 275,000 hospitalizations. TBI plays a role in approximately one third of all injury related deaths1. Patients who survive the initial event can have debilitating long-term sequelae. TBI actually consists of multiple pathological entities broadly defined by an “alteration in brain function, or other evidence of brain pathology, caused by an external force2.” Imaging plays a crucial role in evaluation and diagnosis of TBI, particularly relevant is its role for triage in the acute setting for determination of which patients require emergent neurosurgical intervention. Thus, the treating practitioner and radiologist must be familiar with the various imaging manifestations of TBI pathology and their impact on clinical presentation, management, and prognosis.
The damage incurred by TBI can be differentiated into primary and secondary mechanisms. Primary injury is typically defined as the direct mechanical damage caused by trauma. These injuries are usually apparent acutely and include fractures, intracranial hemorrhage, contusion and traumatic axonal injury. This type of injury is best detected with conventional CT and MR structural imaging techniques. Secondary injury mechanisms are varied, and relate to disruption of the blood brain barrier, production of reactive oxygen species and resultant oxidative stress, metabolic dysfunction, inflammation and excitotoxicity 3, 4. These processes are mediated at the cellular level which is currently below the resolution of conventional imaging; however, they are believed to greatly contribute to the long term morbidity and disability associated with TBI. When severe, macroscopic manifestations of secondary injuries may become apparent as diffuse cerebral hyperemia, cytotoxic and/or vasogenic edema, and tissue ischemia,
Clinical examination remains the cornerstone of acute TBI assessment. There are numerous clinical classification systems for TBI based on symptomology and severity, the most entrenched of which is the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 5 The GCS is a clinical assessment tool with scores ranging from 3 to 15 based upon three components of neurologic function: 1) eye opening to external stimuli, 2) motor response to stimuli, and 3) verbal response. TBI is commonly subdivided into mild (≥13), moderate (9-12) and severe grade (3-8) using the GCS (Table 1.) While the GCS score has been shown to correlate with outcomes, it has limitations. Different varieties of pathoanatomic lesions can result in low GCS scores at admission6. For example, initial low GCS scores may be seen with subdural hematomas (SDHs), epidural hematomas (EDHs), cortical contusions, intracerebral hematomas (ICHs), and traumatic axonal injury (TAI), though, these lesions may have very different clinical courses and long-term prognoses6, 7. Evaluation is also limited by sedation, paralysis, and pre-existing injuries. Despite these limitations, the GCS has relatively high inter-rater reliability and does an adequate job of quickly and accurately stratifying patients broadly based on clinical severity of injury. GCS subscores should always be reported to convey a more granular description of neurologic impairment instead of simply reporting the composite score, which is less meaningful in isolation.
Table 1.
BEHAVIOR | RESPONSE | SCORE |
---|---|---|
Eye opening response | Spontaneously | 4 |
To speech | 3 | |
To pain | 2 | |
No response | 1 | |
Best verbal response | Oriented to time, place, and person | 5 |
Confused | 4 | |
Inappropriate words | 3 | |
incomprehensible sounds | 2 | |
No response | 1 | |
Best motor response | Obeys commands | 6 |
Moves to localized pain | 5 | |
Flexion withdrawal from pain | 4 | |
Abnormal flexion (decorticate) | 3 | |
Abnormal extension (decerebrate) | 2 | |
No response | 1 | |
Total score: | ____ | |
Best response | 15 | |
Comatose patient | 8 or less | |
Totally unresponsive | 3 |
From Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4; with permission.
In conjunction with neurologic exam and clinical history, pathoanatomic characterization of TBI lesions with imaging is critical for triage and prognostication. In order to standardize definitions and imaging protocols for TBI classification and to promote research, the Interagency Common Data Elements Project was established in 20088. Throughout the following descriptions of TBI injury classification and imaging protocols, we attempt to adhere to the common data element pathoanatomic terminologies and recommendations9, 10. We will begin with a brief summary of modality-specific indications for TBI. Technical considerations and neuroimaging protocols will also be examined. Characteristic findings associated with the most frequently encountered extra-axial and intra-axial pathoanatomic lesions will then be described. Finally, a brief review of advanced imaging techniques for TBI evaluation will be reviewed. Throughout, we aim to highlight how standardized imaging-based characterization of pathoanatomic lesions may complement clinical assessment for optimal triage and management of TBI patients.
ROUTINE CLINICAL IMAGING
Routine clinical imaging for suspected traumatic brain injury typically consists of noncontrast CT and MRI in select cases11, 12. Cases of known and suspected primary vascular abnormality may require the addition of noninvasive angiography (CT angiography or MR angiography) or catheter angiography for diagnosis, and in some cases, treatment. In the past, skull radiographs were performed as a first-line study to evaluate for calvarial fractures in children (Figure 1), though, this has fallen out of favor because significant intracranial pathology can occur in absence of skull fracture13. In some cases of suspected pediatric non-accidental trauma, skull radiographs are still performed as part of a skeletal survey in addition to CT, however this does not supplant the need for CT when TBI is clinically suspected. Although radiographs may help differentiate accessory sutures from fractures, this too may become obsolete as three-dimensional skull reformats are increasingly available in clinical practice14. In addition, the current CT “scout” view may often serve as a pseudo-radiograph. Transfontanel ultrasound can detect some superficial lesions in neonates such as extra-axial hemorrhage (Figure 1) and has some advocates15, but is limited by a number of blind spots including parenchymal, posterior fossa and peripheral extra-axial lesions16 and does not generally have a role in head trauma evaluation12.
Roles for CT and MR imaging
Acute Moderate and Severe TBI
Rapid imaging helps differentiate patients who require urgent/emergent neurosurgical intervention from those who can be safely monitored or sent home. Noncontrast multi-detector CT (MDCT) has become the consensus choice11, 17 for the initial imaging study after acute moderate to severe TBI because it is fast, ubiquitous, very sensitive to calvarial injury and radio-opaque foreign bodies (e.g., gunshot fragments), and it is highly accurate for detecting injuries requiring emergent neurosurgical attention--namely hemorrhage, herniation and hydrocephalus. MDCT has also been shown to be useful for predicting clinical outcomes, and the NCCT findings have been incorporated into a number of outcome prediction rules18-21.
MRI is not typically indicated for the initial evaluation of TBI, as it is less sensitive for fractures, takes longer to acquire, is generally less available, and is relatively expensive as a screening modality. MRI also requires additional safety screening for incompatible medical devices and metallic foreign bodies. However, MRI is exquisitely sensitive to pathologic changes related to even mild TBI (mTBI) and has demonstrated utility for assessing injury severity and prognostication, as discussed in later sections below.
Acute Mild TBI
Mild TBI, as defined by a GCS ≥13, is a misnomer in many cases as patients in this category often experience long-term debilitating symptoms that may interfere with normal daily activities22. Nor does this definition for mTBI imply an absence of structural abnormalities on imaging. In a recent prospective study evaluating imaging features in mTBI patients, Yuh and colleagues identified TBI-CDE-defined pathoanatomic features in 42% of patients when combining results from day-of-injury CT and semiacute MRI22. Several guidelines, including the Canadian CT Head Rules20, New Orleans Criteria21, and National Emergency X-Ray Utilization Study (NEXUS)-II19 are routinely employed to identify the cohort of patients who can safely bypass the initial noncontrast CT18. When imaging is clinically indicated, noncontrast CT is the primary initial modality of choice for evaluation of acute mTBI 11, 17. After clinical screening, the majority of patients with mTBI for which imaging is indicated will have normal noncontrast CTs (i.e. “Uncomplicated” mTBI).
Short-term Follow-up Imaging
While MDCT is recommended in patients with neurological deterioration following TBI, studies have shown little benefit for routine follow up imaging23. Among patients with initial MDCT positive for intracranial traumatic injury, only certain attributes including subfrontal/temporal hemorrhagic contusion, use of anticoagulation, age over 65 years, and volume of ICH >10 cc have shown high risk for progression24. At many institutions it is commonplace to obtain routine follow up MDCT in patients on anticoagulation, even when the initial MDCT is negative for acute intracranial pathology, though the clinical utility of this practice is not well established25. One recent prospective study evaluating patients with mild head trauma who were on anticoagulation found that repeat head CT imaging revealed hemorrhagic changes in only 1.4% of such patients after negative initial scan26.
MRI often plays a complementary role to CT and is most indicated in the acute setting for mTBI when a patient's symptoms and/or neurologic exam are not explained by CT findings. Compared with CT, MRI is far more sensitive for detection of acute traumatic pathology in mTBI, particularly for detection of non-hemorrhagic contusion and traumatic axonal injury (TAI)27-33. For these reasons, MRI is also indicated within the first 2 weeks of any moderate or severe TBI for sensitive assessment of the degree of parenchymal injury.
Imaging Subacute/Chronic TBI
Subacute and chronic TBI are best evaluated with MRI11, 17, 34, which outperforms CT in its ability to identify parenchymal atrophy, white matter injury, and microhemorrhage. Imaging is indicated in patients who experience new, persistent, or worsening symptoms. NCCT should be performed to evaluate subacute/chronic TBI if MRI is contraindicated or unavailable.
Vascular Imaging
Intravenous contrast administration is not necessary or useful in the evaluation of TBI unless arterial or venous injury is suspected. NCCT findings can identify patients at increased risk for traumatic vascular injuries35. Patients with skull base fractures, particularly through the carotid canal, have much higher incidence of arterial injuries. Other findings that should raise suspicion for arterial injury include epistaxis, LeFort II and III facial fractures, high cervical spine fractures, GCS ≤8, or TAI36. Either CTA or MRA can be performed as an initial screening evaluation for arterial injury11, 17, though CTA has gained popularity over the past decade with the proliferation of MDCT and the resultant high quality, 3-dimensional reformats (3D), rapid imaging of contrast bolus37. Conventional catheter angiography may be necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of certain lesions.
Venous injury should be suspected in patients with skull fractures extending across adjacent dural venous sinuses. A common injury involves an occipital fracture extending to the underlying transverse sinus (Figure 2). Either CT Venography (CTV) or MR Venography (MRV) are indicated to evaluate for dural venous sinus thrombosis in such cases 11.
Pediatric imaging
Head trauma is a common imaging indication in children and recommended imaging studies largely mirror those recommended for adults for given indications12. Children are more susceptible to harmful effects of ionizing radiation than adults and every effort should be made to avoid unnecessary examinations, particularly CT. In balance, however, diagnostic head CT should not be avoided when clinically indicated because of an overemphasized concern for the relatively small radiation dose associated with modern scanners. When CT is performed, dedicated pediatric CT protocols should be used to keep the dose as low as possible (see http://www.imagegently.org for more information). MRI does not expose patients to ionizing radiation; however, it does present its own challenges in pediatric patients. Children may require general anesthesia to tolerate MR examinations, which are much longer and more sensitive to motion than CT. “Rapid” MRI exams with limited sequences and imaging time reduced to 3-4 minutes38 may help with this in the future, but further studies are required to ensure diagnostic accuracy is on par with CT and standard MR imaging.
IMAGING PROTOCOLS FOR TBI
Optimal neuroimaging protocols for specific head injuries vary depending on individual patient and environmental circumstances. This is particularly true for MR imaging, where there is a greater diversity in choice of available sequences and imaging parameters. It is important to always keep the patient's clinical condition in mind; at times, it is necessary to omit certain sequences in an abbreviated MR examination or substitute CT to shorten the examination time.
Experts in TBI recently convened as part of the “Advanced Integrated Research on Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury: Common Data Elements (CDE)” joint workshop9. During this meeting, an expert panel proposed standardized CT and MRI protocols for studying TBI. The panel defined different imaging protocols into a Tier 1 practical clinical imaging protocol and advanced research protocols (Tiers 2 through 4). In this section we describe the Tier 1 clinical imaging protocols. Description of some elements of the Tiers 2 to 4 protocols can be found later in the advanced imaging subsections.
Routine CT protocol
CT imaging is typically acquired helically in the axial plane on a MDCT scanner. An axial slice thickness of 2.5 mm is commonly employed for evaluating the brain parenchyma, though, thinner reformats (0.625 mm) using a bone kernel is recommended for the detection of subtle fractures. Helical acquisition allows the generation of reformatted images in different planes (typically coronal and sagittal), as well as volume rendered 3D reformats, which can aid in the detection of subtle intracranial hemorrhage and fractures39, 40. Modern CT scanners also typically employ dose reduction software, which reduces patient radiation exposure.
Routine MRI protocol
The recommended clinical protocol (Tier 1) tailored for TBI evaluation (Table 2) incorporates multiplanar T1-weighted images (T1WI) (3D T1 if available), T2-weighted images (T2WI) (at 3T, 3D T2 is recommended if available), T2-FLAIR weighted, and T2*-weighted gradient-recalled echo (GRE) or susceptibility weighted (SWI) sequences, in addition to standard diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). SWI sequences are rapidly being added to routine TBI imaging protocols are preferred over GRE due to their increased sensitivity for blood products 41. Detection, localization and characterization of traumatic lesions benefit from the incoporation of multiple imaging planes, an advantage of 3D acquisitions 9, 27, 29, 30, 32. Multiplanar imaging is particularly helpful in detecting small lesions (e.g., traumatic brainstem injury) which can be missed due to partial volume averaging effects or an interslice gap 30.
Table 2.
Field Strength | 1.5T | 3T | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sequence | Orientation | Imaging time (min) | Sequence | Orientation | Imaging time (min) | |
Preferred Sequences | 3D T1W | Sagittal | 8 | 3D T1W | Sagittal | 4 |
T2W FSE | Axial | 3 | 3D T2W | Sagittal | 4 | |
T2W FLAIR | Axial | 3 | T2W FLAIR | Axial | 3 | |
DWI EPI | Axial | 2 | DWI EPI | Axial | 2 | |
3D SWI | Axial | 8 | 3D SWI | Axial | 6 | |
Total: 24 | Total: 19 | |||||
Alternatives Sequences | T1W SE* | Sagittal | 3 | T2W FSE† | Axial | 3 |
2D GRE‡ | Axial | 3 | 2D GRE§ | Axial | 3 |
Option if 3D T1W is not available
Option if 3D T2W is not available
Option if 3D SWI is not available
From Haacke EM, Duhaime AC, Gean AD, et al. Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2010;32(3):516-543; with permission.
Attributes of particular sequences for imaging specific pathologies will be covered in detail in the sections below. Briefly, T1WI is commonly employed to map brain anatomy while T2WI is sensitive to pathology. Increased water content, as seen in cerebral edema, manifests as T2 prolongation and increased T2 signal intensity. 3D T1 sequences can be utilized for quantitative volumetric analysis of the brain (usually in research settings)42.
FLAIR T2WI increases the conspicuity of lesions adjacent to, and within, the ventricles and subarachnoid spaces by supressing CSF signal, which is normally bright on T2WI. GRE images and SWI sequences take advantage of artifacts associated with blood products to identify hematomas by their distinctive areas of magnetic susceptibility-induced hypointensity arising from paramagnetic iron.
DWI measures the freedom of molecular motion of water in tissue and is useful in identifying pathologic lesions including foci of axonal injury and infarction43, 44. DWI is best used in conjunction with its associated ADC map which can distinguish between cytotoxic and vasogenic edema in the acute and subacute phases and is highly sensitive in the detection of secondary acute ischemic infarction associated with TBI.
Postcontrast T1WI is not recommended as part of routine TBI MRI protocol as it does not improve sensitivity for TBI lesions9. Postcontrast imaging can be employed as an optional sequence in certain situations, such as establishing chronicity of injury, subacute ischemia, or when non-traumatic intracranial pathologies are under consideration45.
IMAGING FINDINGS OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES
Intracranial pathology can be subdivided to anatomic location, the most basic distinction being whether it localizes to the brain parenchyma (intra-axial) or outside the brain tissue (extra-axial). Vascular injuries, while typically extra-axial, are addressed separately in this discussion to highlight differences in the imaging workup.
Extra-axial lesions
Three intracranial, extra-axial spaces—epidural, subdural, and subarachnoid spaces—are potential sites for posttraumatic pathology, most often hemorrhage. . NCCT is excellent at detecting acute hemorrhage, which appears hyperdense to the surrounding brain parenchyma typically measuring between 50 and 70 Hounsfield units. In general, the density of a hematoma decreases as it ages, which can create challenges for identifying subacute and chronic hemorrhages that may appear isodense to the surrounding brain parenchyma.
While initially thought to be less sensitive than CT for acute hemorrhage, modern MRI now outperforms CT in identifying hemorrhage throughout all stages of its evolution, particularly small, subacute bleeds29, 46. Additionally, due to biochemical changes in hemoglobin over time that alter T1 and T2 relaxation times in hematoma, the age of hemorrhage can be estimated with MRI (Table 3)46.
Table 3.
Time frame | Molecular Species | Celluar compartment | T1WI signal§ | T2WI signal†† | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hyperacute | <24 h | Oxyhemoglobin | Intracellular | Isointense | Iso-/Hyperintense |
Acute | 1-3 d | Deoxyhemoglobin | Intracellular | Iso-/Hypointense | Hypointense |
Early Subacute | 3-7 d | Methemoglobin | Intracellular | Hyperintense | Hypointense |
Late Subacute | 7-14 d | Methemoglobin | Extracellular | Hyperintense | Hyperintense |
Chronic | >14 d | ||||
Rim | Hemosiderin | Intracellular | Hypointense | Hypointense | |
Center | Hemichromes | Extracellular | Isointense | Hyperintense |
Compared to the signal intensity of normal brain parenchyma.
Adapted from W G Bradley J. MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology 1993;189(1):15-26; with permission.
Epidural hematoma
Epidural hematomas (EDH) form as blood collects in the potential spaces between the inner table of the skull and the dura. EDHs can be arterial or venous in origin, and may relate to direct bleeding from fractured bone into the epidural space. Arterial epidural hematomas most commonly arise from laceration of meningeal arteries--typically the middle meningeal artery in the temporal or temporoparietal region47-52. In adults, an overlying skull fracture is present in the vast majority of cases. Occasionally (9%), EDHs can occur from stretching and tearing of meningeal arteries in the absence of fracture. The latter occurs commonly in children due to transient deformation and depression of the calvarial vault47.
EDHs classically appear as a lenticular-shaped hematoma, which can cross dural attachment sites, but cannot cross cranial sutures (Figure 3). On CT, acute EDHs generally appear hyperdense. Some hematomas can appear heterogeneous with intrinsic irregular areas of low density, termed the “swirl sign,” an important imaging finding that corresponds to extravasation of hyperacute unclotted blood53. EDHs with this sign tend to rapidly expand and warrant urgent surgical consultation. Rarely, it may be difficult to differentiate a small EDH that does not have the classic shape from a subdural hematoma (SDH) on CT. On MRI, the dura mater can often be visualized as a thin line of low signal intensity displaced away from the inner table of the skull, confirming the diagnosis of an EDH29, 30.
Venous EDHs are less common than those of arterial origin47-52. They typically are caused by laceration of a dural sinus in conjunction with fracture of the overlying skull52, 54. The posterior fossa (transverse or sigmoid sinus injury), middle cranial fossa (sphenoparietal sinus) (Figure 3G-I), and parasagittal region (superior sagittal sinus) are the most common locations for venous EHD54. Venous EDHs, unlike SDHs, are not bound by dural attachments and will often extend both above and below the tentorium. Posterior fossa EDHs occur less frequently (2-29%), are more likely to be of venous origin (85%), and are associated with poorer outcomes than supratentorial lesions47, 55, 56. Differentiation of arterial and venous EDHs is usually possible with MR and may have some therapeutic and prognostic significance as venous EDH typically do not progress as rapidly as arterial EDH52. Venous EDH may exhibit a more variable shape than those of arterial origin47, 52. Invariably, venous EDH are found adjacent to a fracture transgressing a dural venous sinus47, 55, 56. These injuries have a high rate of associated dural sinus thrombosis or occlusion51 . When in question, patency of the sinus can usually be established by CTV or MRV. When evaluating for venous sinus injury, it is important to distinguish external sinus compression by epidural blood from traumatic venous sinus thrombosis. In the latter, the dural venous sinus is usually irregular with a central sinus filling defect correlating to the thrombus.
Subdural hematoma
Within the skull, the brain is relatively mobile and can move relative to the fixed dural sinuses. Injury to the bridging veins that traverse the subdural space connecting the brain to the dural sinuses results in the SDH57-59. While SDHs are most often found along the supratentorial convexities, they can also occur in the posterior fossa, along the falx cerebri, and adjacent to the tentorium60, 61. Interhemispheric and tentorial leaf SDH are common in children, including cases of abuse resulting from violent shaking (shaken-baby syndrome)62-65. Although these hematomas are not specific for child abuse, their presence should lead to close consideration of the possibility.
Most SDHs manifest as a crescentic collection between the brain and the or inner table of the skull; interhemispheric and tentorial SDHs have a more linear morphology. All SDHs follow the typical appearance of evolving blood on CT and MR (Figure 4). While large acute hyperdense SDHs are readily apparent on CT, small subacute SDHs are often isodense and can be difficult to identify (Figure 4C). MR has been shown to be considerably more sensitive than CT for detection of SDH29, 30, 66 and the MR signal characteristics varies predictably with the age of the lesion (Table 3). SDHs appear much more conspicuous on MR due to high imaging contrast between the hematoma and signal void of the adjacent cortical bone (Figure 4E). Fortunately, SDHs not identified with CT almost always measure only 1 to 2 mm in diameter and are of doubtful clinical significance29. MR also more clearly reveals the multicompartmental nature of subacute to chronic SDH, which can help establish the age of lesions and aid in planning for surgical drainage of these complex lesions27.
Subarachnoid and Intraventricular Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a common finding in TBI. One large European series found evidence of SAH in 40% of patients with moderate-severe head injury67, 68. Traumatic SAH is also the most common isolated finding in cases of mTBI and has been associated with poor outcome scores at 3 months after injury22. Acute traumatic SAH results from injury to small subarachnoid vessels or extension of intraparenchymal hemorrhage beyond the pial limiting membrane and into the subarachnoid space. Traumatic pseudoaneurysms typically do not occur in the acute setting.
Acute SAH appears as curvilinear hyperdensity within the cortical sulci, sylvian fissures and basal cisterns on NCCT (Figure 5F). Historically, SAH was considered far more difficult to detect with conventional MR than with CT69, 70; however, more recent technical improvements and additional sequences have shown MRI to be sensitive to SAH and hold some advantages over CT. FLAIR sequences are highly sensitive to SAH (Figure 5C) in both acute and subacute periods71-73, whereas CT sensitivity falls sharply after the first few days74. CSF FLAIR signal hyperintensity is strongly suggestive of hemorrhage after trauma, although other processes that lead to increased CSF protein/cellularity such as infection and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis may have a similar appearance75. The combination of FLAIR and SWI sequences gives MRI (Figure 5) a better detection rate for SAH than NCCT76.
Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), considered a type of intra-axial injury by some authors, is addressed here because its pathophysiology and imaging findings largely overlap with SAH. IVH is also common in patients with head injury, occurring in from 3% to 35% of cases, depending on the severity of trauma27, 28, 30, 60. Primary IVH may be caused by a variety of traumatic lesions including TAI, intracerebral hematoma (ICH), and contusions27, 28, 30, 60; however, the most prevalent etiology is thought to be the tearing of subependymal veins by rotational strain31. Similar rotational forces are thought to cause callosal TAI and, indeed, one published series identified IVH in 60% of patients with TAI of the corpus callosum, but in only 12% of patients without callosal injury31. Interestingly, another study found that the presence of IVH on admission NCCT was the only CT imaging finding predictive of grade II or III TAI on subsequent MRI77. IVH appears similar to SAH with the blood products appearing hyperdense to CSF on CT and hyperintense to CSF on FLAIR and T1WI with MRI28. A CSF-blood fluid level is often seen layering within the posterior aspect of the occipital horns (remember that the images are acquired with the patient in the supine position). Because the subarachnoid and intraventricular CSF spaces communicate, delayed imaging may demonstrate IVH due to recirculation of SAH and vice versa.
CSF leak
CSF leak is a complication in approximately 1-3% of TBI cases78 and is typically associated with a basilar skull fracture. These cases usually present with CSF rhinorrhea (~80%) or otorrhea (~20%) within the first 48 hours after traumatic injury, though cases can present months to years after the initial insult with meningitis or orthostatic headaches78, 79. CSF rhinorrhea or otorrhea should prompt the search for a skull base fracture on thin section maxillofacial or temporal bone CT11. Common fractures involve of anterior cranial fossa (especially the frontal sinus or cribriform plates), sella and sphenoid sinus, and temporal bone78.
CT cisternography is rarely used for initial evaluation, but can be helpful for problem solving in patients with multiple skull defects, negative initial CT imaging, or to confirm a CSF fistula when the diagnosis is unclear. In this setting, intrathecal contrast media is injected to opacify the CSF spaces. A positive study shows abnormal increased attenuation within a paranasal sinus, nasal cavity or middle ear secondary to contrast passage through the skull base defect80.
Cisternography can also be performed as a nuclear medicine study, most commonly with In-111 DTPA. Positive studies show accumulation of tracer in the nasal cavity. While radionucleotide cisternography lacks the anatomic specificity of CT, it can be useful in certain difficult cases, particularly when combined with endoscopic placement of nasal pledgets. The pledgets are removed 24 hours after radionucleotide injection and activity associated with each pledget is counted to evaluate for occult CSF leak 81.
MRI can be performed to assess for possible encephalocele or meningoencephalocele11. Some authors have advocated routinely obtaining MRI when CT shows complete or lobular, nondependent opacification of a sinus cavity adjacent to a bony defect because brain parenchymal herniation can be challenging to differentiate from sinonasal secretions on CT78. MRI can also show secondary signs of intracranial hypotension resulting from a chronic CSF leak including diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement, subdural collections, “sagging” brainstem and prominence of the dural sinuses and pituitary79.
Intra-axial injury
Intra-axial injuries refer to lesions within the brain parenchyma. Primary traumatic intra-axial lesions include the cortical contusion, intracerebral hematoma, TAI and brain stem injury. There are also secondary intra-axial injuries that can occur as a result of brain swelling and ischemia. While CT and MR are both quite sensitive for identification of extra-axial traumatic injury, MRI has a dominant role in evaluation of intra-axial pathology, as non-hemorrhagic and very small lesions can be occult on CT.
Parenchymal Contusion
Parenchymal contusions (Figure 7) occur when the brain forcibly impacts the irregular surface of the overlying skull, which typically occurs at (coup injury) or opposite (contrecoup) the site of blunt trauma. Contusions frequently are multifocal and bilateral, usually involving the superficial grey matter. They typically occur in the temporal (46%) and frontal (31%) lobes. These injuries tend to occur immediately adjacent to the petrous bone and posterior to the greater sphenoid wing in the temporal lobe and just superior to the cribriform plate, orbit roof, planum sphenoidale, and lesser sphenoid wing in the frontal lobe9, 28, 82. Contusions less often involve the parietal and occipital lobes (13%) and cerebellum (~10%)28. Contusions frequently contain hemorrhagic foci ranging in size from punctate cortical surface petechiae to much larger confluent regions of hemorrhage occupying an entire lobe.
Intracerebral Hematoma
Intracerebral hematomas (ICH) (Figure 8) result from injury to intraparenchymal arteries or veins secondary to rotational strain or penetrating trauma27, 83-85 and are usually located in the fronto-temporal white matter48 or basal ganglia83-85. Differentiation from hemorrhagic contusions or TAI can be challenging83-85; ICHs collect between relatively intact parenchyma in contrast to hemorrhagic contusions wherein hemorrhage is within a larger area of injured edematous brain27. Prognosis of isolated ICH is generally good61, but worsens when the lesion coexists with marked mass effect, TAI, or multiple basal ganglia hemorrhages83, 84. Temporal lobe hematomas are especially unpredictable, because even a relatively small lesion can lead to uncal herniation. When CTA is also performed, the “spot sign”, or active extravasation of contrast into the hematoma, predicts future expansion of the hematoma and worsens clinical outcome86, 87.
Traumatic Axonal Injury
Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is one of the most common and important types of primary injury found in patients with all grades of head trauma. TAI typically results from rotational strain, and manifests as scattered, often bilateral, small white matter lesions with or without hemorrhagic components9. When there are greater than 3 foci of radiographically evident TAI involving at least two separate lobes of the brain and the corpus callosum, the term diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is used.
TAI tends to be multifocal. The severity of injury worsens as involvement of the deep anatomic structures become affected88-90. In the Adams Classification for TAI, Grade 1 injuries involve the lobar white matter, particularly the grey-white junction frontal and temporal lobes (Figure 9A-D). Grade 2 injuries extend to involve the corpus callosum, particularly the splenium (Figure 9E-H). Grade 3 injuries (Figure 10) involve the dorsolateral aspect of the upper brainstem88-90.
TAI lesions are usually ovoid with their long axis oriented in the direction of the involved axonal tracts. They range in size from 2 to 15 mm--peripheral lesions tending to be smaller than more central ones. Overall, CT has poor sensitivity for TAI. Only about 10% of TAI display the classic CT findings of punctate hemorrhage (Figure 9) in the characteristic white matter loci91.
MRI has increased sensitivity for TAI compared with CT33, 92, 93. Hemorrhagic TAI appear as foci of increased magnetic susceptibility on GRE and SWI sequences in the characteristic white matter locations(Figure 9). FLAIR imaging may demonstrate foci of hyperintense signal for both hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic TAI. Acute TAI lesions display reduced ADC values on DWI (Figure 9), a finding that is equal in sensitivity to FLAIR94. MRI may be also a useful prognostic tool. Several recent studies have shown a strong correlation between the burden of TAI lesions and worse clinical outcomes33, 95, 96.
Brain Stem Injury
Brainstem injury (BSI) can be divided into primary injuries that result directly from the initial impact and secondary injuries which develop subsequently30, 97-99. Primary brainstem injury can be divided into 4 categories. The first type occurs when severe posterior displacement of the brain forces the dorsolateral upper brainstem to directly impact the tentorium producing laceration or contusion100. This mechanism is thought to be uncommon and, unlike brainstem TAI, it is not necessarily associated with more diffuse white matter injury.
The other types of BSI are indirect, the most common of which is brainstem TAI57, 101. Brainstem TAI (Figure 11) is invariably seen in the context of similar axonal lesions in the supratentorial white matter88-90. A third type of primary BSI is characterized by multifocal scattered petechial hemorrhages concentrated in the deep central white matter, hypothalamus, thalamus, and periaqueductal rostral brainstem88-90, 102. These lesions usually carry a grim prognosis88-90. While both entities share a shear-strain etiology, unlike brainstem TAI, this entity is not associated with lobar white matter, corpus callosum, or superior cerebellar peduncle lesions88-90. It is worth noting that distribution of these petechial hemorrhages differs from the secondary (Duret) hemorrhages described below. The final type of primary BSI is pontomedullary separation or rent, which is caused by a hyperextension-induced tear of the ventral brainstem at the pontomedullary junction88-90, 103, 104. This injury may range from an incomplete tear to complete brainstem avulsion and is typically104, but not invariably103 fatal.
BSI is usually non-hemorrhagic making visualization with CT difficult28, 30. The bulk of our knowledge about these entities has been derived from autopsy studies; however, MRI has allowed evaluation of BSI in non–fatally injured patients30. MRI studies have shown that BSI is linked to poor clinical outcomes; dorsal hemorrhagic lesions and the bilateral BSI were particularly strongly associated with poor outcomes105. Interestingly, BSI is not universally associated with poor outcomes, as nearly one third of patients with MRI evidence for BSI actually had a good clinical outcome. Non-hemorrhagic lesions were the best predictor for benign clinical course105.
Secondary Injuries
Much of the morbidity and mortality associated with TBI relates to secondary injuries. Mass effect from hematoma or cerebral swelling in a fixed intracranial volume causes increased intracranial pressure and can lead to herniation. Herniation refers to the displacement of brain parenchyma into a different compartment. Subfalcine herniation (Figure 11A) occurs when the cingulate gyrus is displaced beneath the free edge of the falx cerebri. It can lead to further complications including distal anterior cerebral artery (ACA) territory infarcts106 (the callosomarginal branch runs along the cingulate sulcus) and contralateral hydrocephalus secondary to obstruction of the foramen of Monro. Uncal herniation (Figure 12) occurs when downward pressure forces the medial temporal lobes to descend below the tentorial incisura into the ambient cistern where they compress the brainstem or posterior cerebral artery (PCA)107. Mass lesions or edema in the posterior fossa can result in upward herniation of the superior cerebellum through the incisura and compress the superior cerebellar arteries (SCA). Increased pressure from above can force the cerebellar tonsils inferiorly into the foramen magnum causing mass effect on the medulla and compression of the posterior inferior cerebellar arteries (PICA).
Downward transtentorial herniation can lead to BSI secondary to mechanical compression. Duret hemorrhages (Figure 12B,C) are typically centrally located collections of blood in the tegmentum of the rostral pons and midbrain associated with a grim prognosis30, 88-90, 102, 108-110. These secondary brainstem hemorrhages are thought to result from stretching/tearing of upper brainstem penetrating arteries during sudden downward transtentorial herniation30, 102, 109, 110. Focal brainstem infarcts may also occur via the same mechanism30, 102, 111.
Both CT and MR are excellent at evaluating for herniation and hydrocephalus, though MR performs better in the posterior fossa where CT is limited by beam hardening artifact82. Signs of herniation include midline shift, effacement of the basilar cisterns and cerebral sulci, and (often contralateral) ventricular entrapment112.
Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury typically results from a period of catastrophic cardiac or vascular compromise. On imaging it is associated with diffuse cerebral swelling and edema. Classic CT signs include the grey-white reversal sign113(i.e., the white matter appears denser than the grey matter) and pseudo-subarachnoid hemorrhage114 (i.e., the perimesencephalic and sylvian cisterns appear hyperdense to brain; the falx and tentorium also appear abnormally hyperdense). On MRI, the earliest imaging abnormality is reduced diffusion, particularly in the cerebral cortex, cerebellar hemispheres and basal ganglia115. Diffuse hypoxic-ischemic BSI usually occurs in conjunction with supratentorial ischemic injury. Brainstem involvement is usually a late event as the brainstem is usually spared until just prior to death30.
Vascular Injury
Traumatic arterial injury can result from several mechanisms including laceration by fracture fragments, blunt or penetrating trauma, vascular compression from brain herniation as mentioned above, and arterial strain27, 116-118. Intracranial internal carotid artery and vertebral segments are much less likely to suffer injury than the cervical segments119. Skull base fractures are among the most common causes of arterial injury—the presence of basilar fractures on NCCT should always prompt consideration of CTA or MRA for further evaluation116. Conventional angiography may be necessary in some cases, particularly when the lesion is subtle or endovascular therapy is the treatment of choice (e.g., severe hemorrhage, epistaxis, or carotid-cavernous fistula).
Arterial Dissection
Dissection occurs when damage to the arterial intima allows blood products to accumulate within the vessel wall (intramural hematoma) which may narrow or occlude the lumen116. The intracranial internal carotid arteries are most vulnerable to fracture-related dissections and occlusions adjacent to the anterior clinoid process and clino-carotid canal35, 116, 117, 120, 121. Carotid injury in this region is associated with high incidence of concurrent traumatic optic nerve injury and vice versa, so injury to one of these structures should prompt increased attention to the other27, 35. Injuries of the vertebral arteries are also frequently encountered, producing a similar spectrum of injuries as seen with the carotid arteries116. These most commonly include traumatic dissection, laceration, and arteriovenous fistula116.
On CTA and MRA sequences, arterial dissection (Figure 13) can be identified by eccentric narrowing of the vascular lumen with an overall slight increase in the external diameter of the artery119. The addition of thin (<3 mm) T1WI with fat-saturation to highlight T1-shortening (beginning 48 hours after injury) within the subacute intramural hematoma can be helpful to establish definitive vessel occlusion or dissection, which may obviate the need for catheter angiography35. MRI with DWI is also excellent at identifying associated cerebral infarction related to distal emboli or decreased cerebral perfusion.
Traumatic Pseudoaneurysm
Pseudoaneurysms occur when a tear in the inner wall of a vessel is covered by an intact outer adventitial layer35, 116, 117, 120-122. These false aneurysms can develop gradually over a period of a few weeks to a few years. Symptoms, if any, are usually related to suprasellar mass effect causing vision changes and cranial neuropathies, epistaxis, or intermittent ischemic events due to embolization of clot35, 116, 117, 120, 121. On NCCT, pseudoaneurysms appear as hyperdense round masses adjacent to vessels, but they may also have a somewhat irregular morphology (Figure 14). Appearance of a nonacute pseudoaneurysm on MR may vary, but generally it can be identified by concentric laminated rings of hemorrhage in various stages of evolution35. A patent vessel lumen can usually be recognized by its associated flow void35. The tendency of these lesions to present long after trauma can lead to diagnostic confusion; familiarity with their imaging appearance is important to facilitate rapid intervention and prevent potentially catastrophic biopsy of these pseudotumors.
Carotid-Cavernous Fistula
The carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is an arterio-venous fistula (AVF) that results from a full-thickness arterial tear of the ICA located within the cavernous sinus. This allows high pressure arterial blood direct access into the low pressure cavernous sinus venous system35, 116, 118, 123. The CCF can be divided into direct and indirect types based on arterial supply. The direct CCF, as the name implies, features direct communication between the cavernous ICA and cavernous sinus. In the indirect CCF, connection between the carotid system and the cavernous sinus usually occurs via small branches of the ECA or extracavernous ICA. Nearly all direct CCFs occur secondary to trauma, while indirect CCF are much more likely to be non-traumatic.
The imaging appearance of the CCF depends the amount of flow shunted and the patients venous collateral anatomy. “High flow” lesions are suggested on CT and MR imaging by enlargement of the ipsilateral cavernous sinus and surrounding venous structures such as the superior ophthalmic vein and petrosal sinuses116. On a properly timed CTA, asymmetric early enhancement of the affected cavernous sinus and its draining veins may also be noted124. On MRI, abnormal flow voids connoting rapid flow may be seen within these enlarged draining veins 118, 121, and abnormal flow-related enhancement may be noted on MRA. Proptosis, extraocular muscle enlargement,stranding of the retro-orbital fat, and orbital preseptal soft tissue swelling may be identified because of elevated capillary and venous pressure. Bilateral enlargement of the superior ophthalmic veins is a classic finding indicating free communication of the fistula through the cavernous plexus of veins116. However, when the fistula drains predominately via the inferior petrosal sinus, the superior ophthalmic vein may not be abnormally enlarged. Less common “low flow” CCFs occur when the arterial source is a small calibler intracavernous branch of the ICA rather the cavernous ICA itself. Cross-sectional imaging findings may be much less obvious in these cases and conventional arteriography may be required for definitive diagnosis and potential endovascular treatment.
Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
Dural arteriovenous fistulas are rarely traumatic in etiology, though they can occur when an injured artery forms a connection with an adjacent draining vein or venous sinus. Most case reports in the literature involve a skull fracture that lacerates the middle meningeal artery and its associated venae comitantes125, 126. These patients may not develop an EDH as would be expected with middle meningeal artery injury because the arterial extravasation evacuates through a dural (meningeal artery-to-meningeal vein) fistula. These injuries may remain asymptomatic or come to attention during workup for tinnitus months later because of increased flow through the petrosal sinuses and internal jugular vein. Contrast enhanced CT and conventional MR findings in these cases are usually limited to venous distension.
Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL) is a promising, relatively new, advanced MRI technique used to measure cerebral perfusion. ASL electromagnetically tags arterial blood water proximal to the brain which is used as a diffusible tracer to quantify blood flow. Typically, the labelling signal degrades before tagged water molecules can pass through the capillary bed into draining veins; however, in an AVF, the capillary bed is bypassed by the fistula connecting the artery directly to the vein. Therefore, the presence of ASL signal within venous structures should raise concern for an AVF. Indeed, one recent study found that inclusion of ASL sequences may improve sensitivity for small AVFs127.
Cerebral Fat Embolism Syndrome (CFES)
Co-morbid long bone fractures are not infrequent with TBI polytrauma. The exact pathogenesis of cerebral fat emboli is controversial, but one favored hypothesis is traumatic introduction of bone marrow fat into the systemic and pulmonary circulations. Neurologic symptoms may include focal neurological signs or generalized encephalopathy which can range from drowsiness to coma128. The imaging manifestations are best appreciated on MRI as patchy or confluent regions of vasogenic edema involving deep white matter, basal ganglia, corpus callosum, and cerebellar hemispheres129-131. In addition, due to the embolic phenomenon, cytotoxic injury with reduced diffusion has been described132. As a manifestation of CFES, a diffuse pattern of multiple micro-susceptibility lesions may be observed on GRE or SWI sequences related to microhemorrhage and/or secondary vascular stasis with increased intravascular deoxyhemoglobin content and microthrombi formation (Figure 15). The MRI appearance may mimic that of TAI, which often coexists. Distinguishing between these two considerations may have both management and prognostic implications132. Importantly, while TAI is present immediately after injury, CFES usually occurs in a slightly delayed fashion 48-72 hours after injury133, and is often associated with the characteristic pulmonary and cutaneous manifestations of CFES. On imaging, hemorrhagic TAI is usually irregular in size and distribution, with clustered foci of axonal injury in characteristic locations (juxtacortical, splenium, dorsal pons and midbrain), while lesions related to CFES are more symmetric, uniform, and diffuse in appearance, consistent with a mechanism of cardio-embolic showering. In addition, TAI is relatively uncommon in the cerebellum, whereas it is a common location for CFES. The role of advanced imaging techniques such as DTI for characterising CFES is an area of active investigation.
ROLE OF ADVANCED IMAGING TECHNIQUES
Advanced imaging techniques are areas of active research and development and are currently targeted to two main areas: evaluating mTBI and obtaining prognostic information for all levels of TBI severity. While promising, these techniques are limited for current clinical applications37. Presently, none of these advanced MR techniques are recommended by the American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness guidelines for routine evaluation of the TBI patient11. Nevertheless, familiarity with these modalities and their application is worthwhile as they may benefit subsets of current patients and will likely be increasingly utilized in the future.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
The discovery that diffusion of water molecules in cerebral white matter is directionally dependent (anisotropic), with the favored direction of diffusion parallel to the direction of axonal tracts in the brain, laid the foundation for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the brain134. These properties have led to a great deal excitement for DTI as a potential biomarker for white matter pathology, including TBI135. DTI builds upon conventional DWI by adding the ability to determine the 3D directionality and magnitude (tensor) of water motion. This is accomplished by acquiring at least 6 (but usually many more) non-collinear diffusion gradient directions. DTI can quantify diffusion using a variety of parameters, the most common of which are fractional anisotropy (FA), which quantifies the degree of anisotropy within a voxel, and mean diffusivity (MD), which quantifies the average magnitude of diffusivity over all sampled directions.
A complete review of the DTI literature related to TBI is beyond the scope of this article—for greater depth, there are a number of excellent reviews recently published on this topic135-137. To date, attempts to make generalizable conclusions about DTI in TBI in a single individual have been hindered by heterogeneity in study design with respect to patient populations, imaging parameters, analysis techniques and imaging time points135. While most studies of TBI have reported increases in MD and decreases in FA in areas of injury138-146, studies of acute/semiacute TBI can also be found in literature that report affected white matter FA values that are normal147 and/or decreased22, 148 relative to normal controls. In part, these discrepancies likely reflect the intrinsic heterogeneity of TBI, though they also highlight the need for larger studies with standardized imaging and analysis protocols as well as consistent and proper outcome measures135.
“Group analyses” of TBI patients have validated DTI as a robust measure of TAI at that level136. These studies have found abnormal MD and FA frontal and temporal lobe association areas that correlate with behavioural and cognitive outcome measures at follow-up22, 141, 149. A recent study of mTBI patients by Yuh and colleagues22 demonstrated that the prognostic utility of DTI parameters surpassed CT, clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic variables as predictors of 3 and 6 month outcome at both group and individual patient levels. Such studies highlight the potential of DTI for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in individual patients and may soon lead to consensus guidelines for utilization of DTI parameters in TBI imaging.
Perfusion Imaging
TBI is associated with impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation, increased permeability of the blood- brain barrier, and vascular injuries, all of which can lead to altered cerebral blood flow, ischemia and even infarction150. For these reasons, cerebral perfusion has long been a target for imaging interrogation. Numerous techniques have been employed in the literature including single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)151-154, positron emission tomography (PET)155, Xenon-enhanced computed tomography (Xe-CT)156, perfusion CT (CTP)157, and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)158, and as mentioned above, arterial spin-labelling (ASL)159, 160 perfusion MR. Each of these techniques have relative advantages and disadvantages. SPECT and DSC perfusion studies only allow qualitative comparison between regions of the brain37, while 15O2 PET, Xe-CT, CTP and ASL are quantitatively accurate. Xe-CT and 15O2 PET require specialized and expensive equipment that is not widely available, and in the case of 15O2 the extremely short half-life of 15O (2 minutes).
A large proportion of the current data relating to brain perfusion after TBI is derived from 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT151-154, Xe-CT and CTP imaging studies156, 157. In these studies, regional hypoperfusion correlate with injury severity; favorable outcomes are seen in TBI patients with hyperemia on baseline imaging, while oligemia portends a poor outcome156, 157. Of these study types, CTP is the most readily available, however, it requires repeated imaging over a narrow band of skull and does contribute to increased radiation dose.
Fewer studies have evaluated the utility of perfusion-weighted MR techniques in TBI. The most common utilized MR perfusion technique is dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) imaging. Using this technique, Garnett and colleagues158 measured reduced cerebral blood volume (CBV) in areas of contusion, as well as in a subset of patients with normal appearing brain parenchyma. Interestingly, although the sample size in this study was small, reduced CBV was noted on DSC MRI, even in those patients with an otherwise normal MRI, and this correlated with worse clinical outcome158. ASL is an alternative MR perfusion technique that does not require intravenous contrast (see technical description above in the Vascular Injury section.) In mTBI patients undergoing ASL imaging, decreased regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the thalamus was found to be strongly correlated with neurocognitive impairment159, 160. While these studies were underpowered to evaluate prognostic capacity of ASL perfusion in mTBI patients, the findings are enticing. As with other advanced imaging techniques, more prospective and longitudinal studies are needed to determine the role of perfusion imaging for TBI evaluation.
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) allows for quantification of certain tissue metabolites in vivo with standard clinical MR hardware161, 162. Most clinically relevant MRS applications use signal from the hydrogen proton (1H) because of its natural abundance within biologic molecules of interest. This technique produces spectra with peaks corresponding to specific metabolites within a prescribed region of interest or voxel. The peaks for particular metabolites have characteristic locations along a spectrum (chemical shift) and their concentrations can be measured as the area under their respective peak.
Spectroscopic analysis can be performed on tissue within a single cubic volume of interest (single-voxel spectroscopy) or within a multivoxel grid placed over a larger region of interest (chemical shift imaging or MR spectroscopic imaging). Commonly measured metabolites in the brain include N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), a marker of neuronal viability; lactate, a marker of anaerobic glycolysis; choline (Cho), a marker of cellular membrane turnover; Creatinine (Cr), a molecule involved in cellular energy utilization; myo-inositol (mI), a marker of membrane turnover and possibly reactive gliosis; and glutamate and glutamine (Glx), markers of excitatory neurotransmission. Creatinine, often used as a denominator to normalize the other peaks, should be interpreted with caution in MRS studies as its concentration can be altered after TBI.
Spectroscopic studies performed shortly after TBI show a consistent imaging pattern manifested by increased Cho and decreased NAA in regions of the adult brain known to be most susceptible to shear injury such as the splenium of the corpus callosum and centrum semiovale163, 164. These metabolic alterations are thought to reflect TAI, particularly when they occur in the absence of visible injury on conventional anatomic imaging165-168. Longitudinal studies in patients with mTBI have shown these changes to be transient with normalization of NAA, Cho, and Glx peaks164. Interestingly, Cho and mI peaks remain elevated in the chronic stage, which has been attributed to proliferative astrogliosis169. For severe TBI, elevated Cho peaks in the parietal white matter, and elevated Glx peaks in the occipital gray matter, 7 days after injury have been shown to have prognostic value with respect to clinical outcome162, 170. In children, the presence of abnormal lactate, Cho and NAA are associated with poor long-term neuropsychological outcomes171, 172. Evidence correlating MRS findings and mTBI outcomes are more limited. A recent prospective study found that centrum semiovale Cr levels positively correlated with decreased performance on neuropsychiatric metrics assessed 6 months after injury173. Clinical applications for MRS in TBI are also limited by significant overlap in spectral changes seen in a number of other brain disorders, lowering its specificity.
Positron Emission Tomography and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
PET and SPECT are composed of tracer molecules tagged with radioisotopes and are typically used to image physiologic processes. Early studies employing PET and SPECT in TBI primarily focused on perfusion imaging (described above) and metabolic imaging, primarily with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET174. While the current clinical utility for these techniques in TBI is limited, they have a great deal of potential37. For example, recent studies have shown potential for PET radiotracers targeting tau and amyloid plaques175, 176, which are known to occur chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a form of chronic TBI. Like most areas of advanced imaging of TBI, these studies involve only small patient numbers and further validation is needed before they can clinically be used routinely.
DISCUSSION
Significant recent advances have been made in the imaging of TBI; still, there is much to improve. Advanced techniques such as DTI, PET and fMRI hold a great deal of potential, and with more clinical validation and larger studies they will likely move from primarily research modalities to routine clinical use. Several specific injuries show particular promise for future innovations. Among these, mTBI and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) are of interest both because of their high prevalence and their lack of findings on conventional imaging. The ability to glean prognostic information from imaging studies is another promising area of active research. As new neuro-therapeutic options for TBI are introduced, neuroimaging will likely guide which patients will benefit from these agents and also help follow their response to therapy.
KEY POINTS.
Multi-detector CT remains the preferred first line imaging study for moderate and severe traumatic brain injury as it can quickly identify patients who require urgent neurosurgical intervention.
MRI is significantly more sensitive than CT for detection of pathoanatomic lesions in mild TBI.
MRI is more sensitive than CT for many types of traumatic injuries and plays a complementary role. It is most indicated in the acute setting for mild TBI when a patient's symptoms and/or neurologic exam are not explained by CT findings.
Emerging advanced neuroimaging techniques may improve the sensitivity for identifying mild TBI as well as offer prognostic information for all grades of injury.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
AUTHOR CONTACT INFORMATION
Christopher A. Mutch, MD, PhD, christopher.mutch@ucsf.edu, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., M391, San Francisco, CA 94143
Alisa Gean, MD, alisa.gean@ucsf.edu, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
JFT is member of a data monitoring committee for StemCells, Inc. Phase II clinical trial for stem cells in spinal cord injury.
CAM and ADG have nothing to disclose.
Contributor Information
Christopher A. Mutch, Department of Radiology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA.
Jason F. Talbott, Department of Radiology, UCSF and SFGH, San Francisco, CA.
Alisa Gean, Department of Radiology; Adjunct Professor Emeritus of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCSF and SFGH, San Francisco, CA.
REFERENCES
- 1.Faul MD, Xu L, Wald MM, et al. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations and Deaths 2002–2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Atlanta (GA): 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, et al. Position Statement: Definition of Traumatic Brain Injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 91(11):1637–1640. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cornelius C, Crupi R, Calabrese V, et al. Traumatic brain injury: oxidative stress and neuroprotection. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2013;19(8):836–853. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Readnower RD, Chavko M, Adeeb S, et al. Increase in blood–brain barrier permeability, oxidative stress, and activated microglia in a rat model of blast-induced traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2010;88(16):3530–3539. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hawryluk GWJ, Manley GT. Chapter 2 - Classification of traumatic brain injury: past, present, and future. In: Jordan G, Andres MS, editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol. 127. Elsevier; 2015. pp. 15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lobato RD, Cordobes F, Rivas JJ, et al. Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion. A computerized tomography study. Journal of neurosurgery. 1983;59(5):762–774. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, et al. Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet. 1976;1(7968):1031–1034. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92215-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thurmond VA, Hicks R, Gleason T, et al. Advancing integrated research in psychological health and traumatic brain injury: common data elements. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2010;91(11):1633–1636. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haacke EM, Duhaime AC, Gean AD, et al. Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2010;32(3):516–543. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hicks R, Giacino J, Harrison-Felix C, et al. Progress in developing common data elements for traumatic brain injury research: version two--the end of the beginning. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(22):1852–1861. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vilaas S, Shetty M, Martin N, Reis M, Joseph M, Aulino M, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Head Trauma. [November 18, 2015];American College of Radiology. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69481/Narrative/.
- 12.Maura E, Ryan M, Susan Palasis M, Gaurav Saigal M, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Head Trauma — Child. [November 18, 2015];American College of Radiology. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3083021/Narrative/. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Dunning J, Daly JP, Lomas J-P, et al. Derivation of the children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2006;91(11):885–891. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.083980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prabhu SP, Newton AW, Perez-Rossello JM, et al. Three-dimensional skull models as a problem-solving tool in suspected child abuse. Pediatric radiology. 2013;43(5):575–581. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2546-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Trenchs V, Curcoy AI, Castillo M, et al. Minor head trauma and linear skull fracture in infants: cranial ultrasound or computed tomography? European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2009;16(3):150–152. doi: 10.1097/mej.0b013e328321b7b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ball WS., Jr Nonaccidental craniocerebral trauma (child abuse): MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;173(3):609–610. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wintermark M, Sanelli PC, Anzai Y, et al. Imaging Evidence and Recommendations for Traumatic Brain Injury: Conventional Neuroimaging Techniques. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2015;12(2):e1–e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ro YS, Shin SD, Holmes JF, et al. Comparison of Clinical Performance of Cranial Computed Tomography Rules in Patients With Minor Head Injury: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2011;18(6):597–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Herbert M, et al. Developing a decision instrument to guide computed tomographic imaging of blunt head injury patients. The Journal of trauma. 2005;59(4):954–959. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000187813.79047.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1391–1396. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04561-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, et al. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. The New England journal of medicine. 2000;343(2):100–105. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yuh EL, Cooper SR, Mukherjee P, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging for outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(17):1457–1477. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reljic T, Mahony H, Djulbegovic B, et al. Value of repeat head computed tomography after traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):78–98. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Washington CW, Grubb RL., Jr Are routine repeat imaging and intensive care unit admission necessary in mild traumatic brain injury? Journal of neurosurgery. 2012;116(3):549–557. doi: 10.3171/2011.11.JNS111092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Menditto VG, Lucci M, Polonara S, et al. Management of Minor Head Injury in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: A Prospective Study of a 24-Hour Observation Protocol. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 59(6):451–455. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kaen A, Jimenez-Roldan L, Arrese I, et al. The value of sequential computed tomography scanning in anticoagulated patients suffering from minor head injury. The Journal of trauma. 2010;68(4):895–898. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b28a76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gentry LR. Imaging of closed head injury. Radiology. 1994;191(1):1–17. doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B. MR imaging of head trauma: review of the distribution and radiopathologic features of traumatic lesions. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1988;150(3):663–672. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.3.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B, et al. Prospective comparative study of intermediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1988;150(3):673–682. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.3.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson BH. Traumatic brain stem injury: MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;171(1):177–187. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.1.2928523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gentry LR, Thompson B, Godersky JC. Trauma to the corpus callosum: MR features. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1988;9(6):1129–1138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yuh EL, Hawryluk GW, Manley GT. Imaging concussion: a review. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(Suppl 4):S50–63. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yuh EL, Mukherjee P, Lingsma HF, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury. Annals of neurology. 2013;73(2):224–235. doi: 10.1002/ana.23783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Le TH, Gean AD. Neuroimaging of traumatic brain injury. The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York. 2009;76(2):145–162. doi: 10.1002/msj.20102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gentry LR. Facial trauma and associated brain damage. Radiologic clinics of North America. 1989;27(2):435–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bromberg WJ, Collier BC, Diebel LN, et al. Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Practice Management Guidelines: The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2010;68(2):471–477. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cb43da. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wintermark M, Sanelli PC, Anzai Y, et al. Imaging Evidence and Recommendations for Traumatic Brain Injury: Advanced Neuro- and Neurovascular Imaging Techniques. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cohen AR, Caruso P, Duhaime AC, et al. Feasibility of “rapid” magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric acute head injury. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2015;33(7):887–890. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wei SC, Ulmer S, Lev MH, et al. Value of Coronal Reformations in the CT Evaluation of Acute Head Trauma. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2010;31(2):334–339. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zacharia TT, Nguyen DD. Subtle pathology detection with multidetector row coronal and sagittal CT reformations in acute head trauma. Emerg Radiol. 2010;17(2):97–102. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0842-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, et al. Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 1. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2009;30(1):19–30. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang X, Xie H, Cotton AS, et al. Early cortical thickness changes after mild traumatic brain injury following motor vehicle collision. J Neurotrauma. 2014 doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu AY, Maldjian JA, Bagley LJ, et al. Traumatic brain injury: diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1999;20(9):1636–1641. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huisman TA. Diffusion-weighted imaging: basic concepts and application in cerebral stroke and head trauma. European radiology. 2003;13(10):2283–2297. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1843-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lang DA, Hadley DM, Teasdale GM, et al. Gadolinium DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in acute head injury. Acta neurochirurgica. 1991;109(1-2):5–11. doi: 10.1007/BF01405689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gomori JM, Grossman RI, Goldberg HI, et al. Intracranial hematomas: imaging by high-field MR. Radiology. 1985;157(1):87–93. doi: 10.1148/radiology.157.1.4034983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT. Computed tomographic staging of traumatic epidural bleeding. Radiology. 1982;144(4):809–812. doi: 10.1148/radiology.144.4.7111729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baykaner K, Alp H, Ceviker N, et al. Observation of 95 patients with extradural hematoma and review of the literature. Surgical neurology. 1988;30(5):339–341. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(88)90195-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lobato RD, Rivas JJ, Cordobes F, et al. Acute epidural hematoma: an analysis of factors influencing the outcome of patients undergoing surgery in coma. Journal of neurosurgery. 1988;68(1):48–57. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.68.1.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bricolo AP, Pasut LM. Extradural hematoma: toward zero mortality. A prospective study. Neurosurgery. 1984;14(1):8–12. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198401000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Servadei F, Faccani G, Roccella P, et al. Asymptomatic extradural haematomas. Results of a multicenter study of 158 cases in minor head injury. Acta neurochirurgica. 1989;96(1-2):39–45. doi: 10.1007/BF01403493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Knuckey NW, Gelbard S, Epstein MH. The management of “asymptomatic” epidural hematomas. A prospective study. Journal of neurosurgery. 1989;70(3):392–396. doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.70.3.0392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Al-Nakshabandi NA. The Swirl Sign. Radiology. 2001;218(2):433–433. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe09433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gean AD, Fischbein NJ, Purcell DD, et al. Benign anterior temporal epidural hematoma: indolent lesion with a characteristic CT imaging appearance after blunt head trauma. Radiology. 2010;257(1):212–218. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Milo R, Razon N, Schiffer J. Delayed epidural hematoma. A review. Acta neurochirurgica. 1987;84(1-2):13–23. doi: 10.1007/BF01456345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pozzati E, Tognetti F, Cavallo M, et al. Extradural hematomas of the posterior cranial fossa. Observations on a series of 32 consecutive cases treated after the introduction of computed tomography scanning. Surgical neurology. 1989;32(4):300–303. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(89)90234-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gennarelli TA, Spielman GM, Langfitt TW, et al. Influence of the type of intracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury. Journal of neurosurgery. 1982;56(1):26–32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.1.0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Holbourn AHS. Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet. 1943;2:438–441. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Holbourn AHS. The mechanics of brain injuries. Br Med Bull. 1945;3:147–149. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cooper PR. Post-traumatic intracranial mass lesions. 2nd ed Williams & Wilkins; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Seelig JM, Becker DP, Miller JD, et al. Traumatic acute subdural hematoma: major mortality reduction in comatose patients treated within four hours. The New England journal of medicine. 1981;304(25):1511–1518. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198106183042503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sato Y, Yuh WT, Smith WL, et al. Head injury in child abuse: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;173(3):653–657. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bruce DA, Zimmerman RA. Shaken impact syndrome. Pediatric annals. 1989;18(8):482–484. 486–489, 492–484. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19890801-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Bruce D, et al. Computed tomography of craniocerebral injury in the abused child. Radiology. 1979;130(3):687–690. doi: 10.1148/130.3.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cohen RA, Kaufman RA, Myers PA, et al. Cranial computed tomography in the abused child with head injury. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1986;146(1):97–102. doi: 10.2214/ajr.146.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Grossman RI, et al. Resistive NMR of intracranial hematomas. Neuroradiology. 1985;27(1):16–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00342511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, et al. The European Brain Injury Consortium Survey of Head Injuries. Acta neurochirurgica. 1999;141(3):223–236. doi: 10.1007/s007010050292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Servadei F, Murray GD, Teasdale GM, et al. Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: demographic and clinical study of 750 patients from the European brain injury consortium survey of head injuries. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(2):261–267. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200202000-00006. discussion 267-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chakeres DW, Bryan RN. Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: in vitro comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomography. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1986;7(2):223–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bradley WG, Jr., Schmidt PG. Effect of methemoglobin formation on the MR appearance of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Radiology. 1985;156(1):99–103. doi: 10.1148/radiology.156.1.4001427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Stuckey SL, Goh TD, Heffernan T, et al. Hyperintensity in the subarachnoid space on FLAIR MRI. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2007;189(4):913–921. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Maeda M, Yagishita A, Yamamoto T, et al. Abnormal hyperintensity within the subarachnoid space evaluated by fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging: a spectrum of central nervous system diseases. European radiology. 2003;13(Suppl 4):L192–201. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1877-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mitchell P, Wilkinson ID, Hoggard N, et al. Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage with magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2001;70(2):205–211. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.2.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):306–318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tha KK, Terae S, Kudo K, et al. Differential diagnosis of hyperintense cerebrospinal fluid on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the brain. Part II: non-pathological conditions. The British journal of radiology. 2009;82(979):610–614. doi: 10.1259/bjr/29238647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Verma RK, Kottke R, Andereggen L, et al. Detecting subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of combined FLAIR/SWI versus CT. European journal of radiology. 2013;82(9):1539–1545. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Mata-Mbemba D, Mugikura S, Nakagawa A, et al. Intraventricular Hemorrhage on Initial Computed Tomography as Marker of Diffuse Axonal Injury after Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014 doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lloyd KM, DelGaudio JM, Hudgins PA. Imaging of Skull Base Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Adults. Radiology. 2008;248(3):725–736. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483070362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yuh EL, Dillon WP. Intracranial hypotension and intracranial hypertension. Neuroimaging clinics of North America. 2010;20(4):597–617. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2010.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stone JA, Castillo M, Neelon B, et al. Evaluation of CSF leaks: high-resolution CT compared with contrast-enhanced CT and radionuclide cisternography. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1999;20(4):706–712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Glaubitt D, Haubrich J, Cordoni-Voutsas M. Detection and quantitation of intermittent CSF rhinorrhea during prolonged cisternography with 111In-DTPA. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1983;4(3):560–563. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kim JJ, Gean AD. Imaging for the diagnosis and management of traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2011;8(1):39–53. doi: 10.1007/s13311-010-0003-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jayakumar PN, Kolluri VR, Basavakumar DG, et al. Prognosis in traumatic basal ganglia haematoma. Acta neurochirurgica. 1989;97(3-4):114–116. doi: 10.1007/BF01772820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Colquhoun IR, Rawlinson J. The significance of haematomas of the basal ganglia in closed head injury. Clinical radiology. 1989;40(6):619–621. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(89)80324-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Katz DI, Alexander MP, Seliger GM, et al. Traumatic basal ganglia hemorrhage: clinicopathologic features and outcome. Neurology. 1989;39(7):897–904. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.7.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wada R, Aviv RI, Fox AJ, et al. CT angiography “spot sign” predicts hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38(4):1257–1262. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259633.59404.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Park SY, Kong MH, Kim JH, et al. Role of ‘Spot Sign’ on CT Angiography to Predict Hematoma Expansion in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2010;48(5):399–405. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.5.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Adams H, Mitchell DE, Graham DI, et al. Diffuse brain damage of immediate impact type. Its relationship to ‘primary brain-stem damage’ in head injury. Brain. 1977;100(3):489–502. doi: 10.1093/brain/100.3.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Adams JH, Graham DI, Murray LS, et al. Diffuse axonal injury due to nonmissile head injury in humans: an analysis of 45 cases. Annals of neurology. 1982;12(6):557–563. doi: 10.1002/ana.410120610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Adams JH, Graham DI, Scott G, et al. Brain damage in fatal non-missile head injury. Journal of clinical pathology. 1980;33(12):1132–1145. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.12.1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Meythaler JM, Peduzzi JD, Eleftheriou E, et al. Current concepts: Diffuse axonal injury–associated traumatic brain injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 82(10):1461–1471. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mittl RL, Grossman RI, Hiehle JF, et al. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1994;15(8):1583–1589. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Orrison WW, Gentry LR, Stimac GK, et al. Blinded comparison of cranial CT and MR in closed head injury evaluation. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1994;15(2):351–356. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kinoshita T, Moritani T, Hiwatashi A, et al. Conspicuity of diffuse axonal injury lesions on diffusion-weighted MR imaging. European journal of radiology. 2005;56(1):5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Moen KG, Brezova V, Skandsen T, et al. Traumatic axonal injury: the prognostic value of lesion load in corpus callosum, brain stem, and thalamus in different magnetic resonance imaging sequences. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(17):1486–1496. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Schaefer PW, Huisman TA, Sorensen AG, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in closed head injury: high correlation with initial glasgow coma scale score and score on modified Rankin scale at discharge. Radiology. 2004;233(1):58–66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2323031173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Cooper PR, Maravilla K, Kirkpatrick J, et al. Traumatically induced brain stem hemorrhage and the computerized tomographic scan: clinical, pathological, and experimental observations. Neurosurgery. 1979;4(2):115–124. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197902000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Tsai FY, Teal JS, Quinn MF, et al. CT of brainstem injury. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1980;134(4):717–723. doi: 10.2214/ajr.134.4.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Turazzi S, Alexandre A, Bricolo A. Incidence and significance of clinical signs of brainstem traumatic lesions. Study of 2600 head injured patients. Journal of neurosurgical sciences. 1975;19(4):215–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Saeki N, Ito C, Ishige N, et al. [Traumatic brain stem contusion due to direct injury by tentorium cerebelli. Case report]. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 1985;25(11):939–944. doi: 10.2176/nmc.25.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, Adams JH, et al. Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Annals of neurology. 1982;12(6):564–574. doi: 10.1002/ana.410120611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tomlinson BE. Brain-stem lesions after head injury. Journal of clinical pathology Supplement. 1970;4:154–165. doi: 10.1136/jcp.s3-4.1.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Pilz P. Survival after ponto-medullary junction trauma. Acta neurochirurgica Supplementum. 1983;32:75–78. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-4147-2_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Britt RH, Herrick MK, Mason RT, et al. Traumatic lesions of pontomedullary junction. Neurosurgery. 1980;6(6):623–631. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198006000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hilario A, Ramos A, Millan JM, et al. Severe Traumatic Head Injury: Prognostic Value of Brain Stem Injuries Detected at MRI. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2012;33(10):1925–1931. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Rothfus WE, Goldberg AL, Tabas JH, et al. Callosomarginal infarction secondary to transfalcial herniation. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1987;8(6):1073–1076. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wernick S, Wells RG. Sequelae of Temporal Lobe Herniation: MR Imaging. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 1989;13(2):323–325. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198903000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Rosenblum WI, Greenberg RP, Seelig JM, et al. Midbrain lesions: frequent and significant prognostic feature in closed head injury. Neurosurgery. 1981;9(6):613–620. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198112000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Friede RL, Roessmann U. The pathogenesis of secondary midbrain hemorrhages. Neurology. 1966;16(12):1210–1216. doi: 10.1212/wnl.16.12.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Caplan LR, Zervas NT. Survival with permanent midbrain dysfunction after surgical treatment of traumatic subdural hematoma: the clinical picture of a Duret hemorrhage? Annals of neurology. 1977;1(6):587–589. doi: 10.1002/ana.410010613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Jellinger K, Seitelberger F. Protracted post-traumatic encephalopathy. Pathology, pathogenesis and clinical implications. Journal of the neurological sciences. 1970;10(1):51–94. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(70)90091-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Johnson PL, Eckard DA, Chason DP, et al. Imaging of acquired cerebral herniations. Neuroimaging clinics of North America. 2002;12(2):217–228. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5149(02)00008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Han BK, Towbin RB, De Courten-Myers G, et al. Reversal sign on CT: effect of anoxic/ischemic cerebral injury in children. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1990;154(2):361–368. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.2.2105031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Given CA, 2nd, Burdette JH, Elster AD, et al. Pseudo-subarachnoid hemorrhage: a potential imaging pitfall associated with diffuse cerebral edema. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2003;24(2):254–256. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Arbelaez A, Castillo M, Mukherji SK. Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging ofGlobal Cerebral Anoxia. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1999;20(6):999–1007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Davis JM, Zimmerman RA. Injury of the carotid and vertebral arteries. Neuroradiology. 1983;25(2):55–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00333294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Goldberg HI, Grossman RI, Gomori JM, et al. Cervical internal carotid artery dissecting hemorrhage: diagnosis using MR. Radiology. 1986;158(1):157–161. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Sklar EM, Quencer RM, Bowen BC, et al. Magnetic resonance applications in cerebral injury. Radiologic clinics of North America. 1992;30(2):353–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Rodallec MH, Marteau V, Gerber S, et al. Craniocervical Arterial Dissection: Spectrum of Imaging Findings and Differential Diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2008;28(6):1711–1728. doi: 10.1148/rg.286085512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Barr HW, Blackwood W, Meadows SP. Intracavernous carotid aneurysms. A clinical-pathological report. Brain. 1971;94(4):607–622. doi: 10.1093/brain/94.4.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Mokri B, Piepgras DG, Sundt TM, Jr., et al. Extracranial internal carotid artery aneurysms. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 1982;57(5):310–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Edwards JD, Sapienza P, Lefkowitz DM, et al. Posttraumatic innominate artery aneurysm with occlusion of the common carotid artery at its origin by an intimal flap. Annals of vascular surgery. 1993;7(4):368–373. doi: 10.1007/BF02002892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Komiyama M, Hakuba A, Yasui T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intracavernous pathology. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 1989;29(7):573–578. doi: 10.2176/nmc.29.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Coskun O, Hamon M, Catroux G, et al. Carotid-cavernous Fistulas: Diagnosis with Spiral CT Angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2000;21(4):712–716. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Feldman RA, Hieshima G, Giannotta SL, et al. Traumatic dural arteriovenous fistula supplied by scalp, meningeal, and cortical arteries: case report. Neurosurgery. 1980;6(6):670–674. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198006000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Vassilyadi M, Mehrotra N, Shamji MF, et al. Pediatric traumatic dural arteriovenous fistula. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 2009;36(6):751–756. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100008386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Le TT, Fischbein NJ, Andre JB, et al. Identification of venous signal on arterial spin labeling improves diagnosis of dural arteriovenous fistulas and small arteriovenous malformations. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2012;33(1):61–68. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Jacobson DM, Terrence CF, Reinmuth OM. The neurologic manifestations of fat embolism. Neurology. 1986;36(6):847–851. doi: 10.1212/wnl.36.6.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Citerio G, Bianchini E, Beretta L. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral fat embolism: a case report. Intensive care medicine. 1995;21(8):679–681. doi: 10.1007/BF01711549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Stoeger A, Daniaux M, Felber S, et al. MRI findings in cerebral fat embolism. European radiology. 1998;8(9):1590–1593. doi: 10.1007/s003300050592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Takahashi M, Suzuki R, Osakabe Y, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in cerebral fat embolism: correlation with clinical manifestations. The Journal of trauma. 1999;46(2):324–327. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199902000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Bodanapally U, Shanmuganathan K, Saksobhavivat N, et al. MR imaging and differentiation of cerebral fat embolism syndrome from diffuse axonal injury: application of diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(6):771–778. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1166-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Chen PC, Hsu CW, Liao WI, et al. Hyperacute cerebral fat embolism in a patient with femoral shaft fracture. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2013;31(9):1420, e1421–1423. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Kucharczyk J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology. 1990;176(2):439–445. doi: 10.1148/radiology.176.2.2367658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Hulkower MB, Poliak DB, Rosenbaum SB, et al. A decade of DTI in traumatic brain injury: 10 years and 100 articles later. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2013;34(11):2064–2074. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Niogi SN, Mukherjee P. Diffusion tensor imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2010;25(4):241–255. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e52c2a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Shenton ME, Hamoda HM, Schneiderman JS, et al. A review of magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain imaging and behavior. 2012;6(2):137–192. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9156-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Arfanakis K, Haughton VM, Carew JD, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2002;23(5):794–802. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Brandstack N, Kurki T, Tenovuo O. Quantitative diffusion-tensor tractography of long association tracts in patients with traumatic brain injury without associated findings at routine MR imaging. Radiology. 2013;267(1):231–239. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Kumar R, Gupta RK, Husain M, et al. Comparative evaluation of corpus callosum DTI metrics in acute mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: its correlation with neuropsychometric tests. Brain injury : [BI] 2009;23(7):675–685. doi: 10.1080/02699050903014915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Miles L, Grossman RI, Johnson G, et al. Short-term DTI predictors of cognitive dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain injury : [BI] 2008;22(2):115–122. doi: 10.1080/02699050801888816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Newcombe VF, Williams GB, Nortje J, et al. Analysis of acute traumatic axonal injury using diffusion tensor imaging. British journal of neurosurgery. 2007;21(4):340–348. doi: 10.1080/02688690701400882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Wilde EA, Ramos MA, Yallampalli R, et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Cingulum Bundle in Children After Traumatic Brain Injury. Developmental neuropsychology. 2010;35(3):333–351. doi: 10.1080/87565641003696940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Wozniak JR, Krach L, Ward E, et al. Neurocognitive and neuroimaging correlates of pediatric traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Archives of clinical neuropsychology: the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists. 2007;22(5):555–568. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Henry LC, Tremblay J, Tremblay S, et al. Acute and chronic changes in diffusivity measures after sports concussion. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(10):2049–2059. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wilde EA, McCauley SR, Hunter JV, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Neurology. 2008;70(12):948–955. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Perez AM, Adler J, Kulkarni N, et al. Longitudinal white matter changes after traumatic axonal injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(17):1478–1485. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Toth A, Kovacs N, Perlaki G, et al. Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging in the acute and sub-acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury: can we see the difference? J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(1):2–10. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Lipton ML, Gulko E, Zimmerman ME, et al. Diffusion-tensor imaging implicates prefrontal axonal injury in executive function impairment following very mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology. 2009;252(3):816–824. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2523081584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Bigler ED, Maxwell WL. Neuropathology of mild traumatic brain injury: relationship to neuroimaging findings. Brain imaging and behavior. 2012;6(2):108–136. doi: 10.1007/s11682-011-9145-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Abu-Judeh HH, Singh M, Masdeu JC, et al. Discordance between FDG uptake and technetium-99m-HMPAO brain perfusion in acute traumatic brain injury. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1998;39(8):1357–1359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Hofman PA, Stapert SZ, van Kroonenburgh MJ, et al. MR imaging, single-photon emission CT, and neurocognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2001;22(3):441–449. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Jacobs A, Put E, Ingels M, et al. Prospective evaluation of technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1994;35(6):942–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Davalos DB, Bennett TL. A review of the use of single-photon emission computerized tomography as a diagnostic tool in mild traumatic brain injury. Applied neuropsychology. 2002;9(2):92–105. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0902_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Yamaki T, Imahori Y, Ohmori Y, et al. Cerebral Hemodynamics and Metabolism of Severe Diffuse Brain Injury Measured by PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1996;37(7):1166–1170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Rostami E, Engquist H, Enblad P. Imaging of cerebral blood flow in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the neurointensive care. Frontiers in neurology. 2014;5:114. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Wintermark M, van Melle G, Schnyder P, et al. Admission perfusion CT: prognostic value in patients with severe head trauma. Radiology. 2004;232(1):211–220. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321030824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Garnett MR, Blamire AM, Corkill RG, et al. Abnormal cerebral blood volume in regions of contused and normal appearing brain following traumatic brain injury using perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18(6):585–593. doi: 10.1089/089771501750291828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Ge Y, Patel MB, Chen Q, et al. Assessment of thalamic perfusion in patients with mild traumatic brain injury by true FISP arterial spin labelling MR imaging at 3T. Brain injury : [BI] 2009;23(7):666–674. doi: 10.1080/02699050903014899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Grossman EJ, Jensen JH, Babb JS, et al. Cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal diffusional kurtosis and perfusion imaging study. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2013;34(5):951–957. S951–953. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Lin AP, Liao HJ, Merugumala SK, et al. Metabolic imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain imaging and behavior. 2012;6(2):208–223. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9181-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Shutter L, Tong KA, Holshouser BA. Proton MRS in acute traumatic brain injury: role for glutamate/glutamine and choline for outcome prediction. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(12):1693–1705. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Henry LC, Tremblay S, Leclerc S, et al. Metabolic changes in concussed American football players during the acute and chronic post-injury phases. BMC neurology. 2011;11:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Vagnozzi R, Signoretti S, Cristofori L, et al. Assessment of metabolic brain damage and recovery following mild traumatic brain injury: a multicentre, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in concussed patients. Brain. 2010;133(11):3232–3242. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Signoretti S, Marmarou A, Fatouros P, et al. Application of chemical shift imaging for measurement of NAA in head injured patients. Acta neurochirurgica Supplement. 2002;81:373–375. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6738-0_94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Brooks WM, Stidley CA, Petropoulos H, et al. Metabolic and cognitive response to human traumatic brain injury: a quantitative proton magnetic resonance study. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17(8):629–640. doi: 10.1089/089771500415382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Garnett MR, Corkill RG, Blamire AM, et al. Altered cellular metabolism following traumatic brain injury: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18(3):231–240. doi: 10.1089/08977150151070838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Cecil KM, Hills EC, Sandel ME, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for detection of axonal injury in the splenium of the corpus callosum of brain-injured patients. Journal of neurosurgery. 1998;88(5):795–801. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Ashwal S, Holshouser B, Tong K, et al. Proton spectroscopy detected myoinositol in children with traumatic brain injury. Pediatric research. 2004;56(4):630–638. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000139928.60530.7D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Ross BD, Bluml S, Cowan R, et al. In vivo MR spectroscopy of human dementia. Neuroimaging clinics of North America. 1998;8(4):809–822. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Babikian T, Freier MC, Ashwal S, et al. MR spectroscopy: predicting long-term neuropsychological outcome following pediatric TBI. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2006;24(4):801–811. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Brenner T, Freier MC, Holshouser BA, et al. Predicting neuropsychologic outcome after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatric Neurology. 2003;28(2):104–114. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(02)00491-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.George EO, Roys S, Sours C, et al. Longitudinal and prognostic evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury: A 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(11):1018–1028. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Byrnes KR, Wilson CM, Brabazon F, et al. FDG-PET imaging in mild traumatic brain injury: a critical review. Frontiers in Neuroenergetics. 2013;5:13. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2013.00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Hong YT, Veenith T, Dewar D, et al. Amyloid imaging with carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh compound B for traumatic brain injury. JAMA neurology. 2014;71(1):23–31. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Small GW, Kepe V, Siddarth P, et al. PET scanning of brain tau in retired national football league players: preliminary findings. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. 2013;21(2):138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.W G Bradley J. MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology. 1993;189(1):15–26. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]