Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2016 May 15;30(8):1221–1228. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001041

Incidence of Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease and Progression on Tenofovir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens: A Cohort Study in HIV-Infected Adults in Cape Town, South Africa

Hadas Zachor 1, Rhoderick Machekano 2, Michelle M Estrella 3, Peter J Veldkamp 1, Michele D Zeier 4, Olalekan A Uthman 5,6, Jantjie J Taljaard 4, Mohammed R Moosa 4, Jean B Nachega 4,7,8
PMCID: PMC5027227  NIHMSID: NIHMS814321  PMID: 26836786

Abstract

Objective

To describe the incidence of rapid kidney function decline (RKFD), and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) in HIV-1-infected adults initiated on tenofovir (TDF)-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study at the infectious diseases clinic of Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Patients with >3 ml/min/year decline in estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) were classified as having RKFD, and stage 3 CKD was defined as a value <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. We used logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models to determine factors associated with RKFD and stage 3 CKD.

Results

Of 650 patients, 361 (55%) experienced RKFD and 15 (2%) developed stage 3 CKD during a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time of 54 (46.6–98) weeks. For every 10-year increase in age and 10mL/min lower baseline eGFR, the odds of RKFD increased by 70% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.13) and 57% (aOR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.80), respectively. Each 10-year older age was associated with a 1.90-fold increased risk of developing stage 3 CKD (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.29). Women had about 4-fold greater risk of stage 3 CKD compared to men (aHR = 3.96, 95% CI: 1.06 to 14.74).

Conclusions

About half of our study population developed RKFD but only 2% progressed to stage 3 CKD. Approaches that provide balanced allocation of limited resources towards screening and monitoring for kidney dysfunction and HIV disease management are critically needed in this setting.

Keywords: HIV, Chronic kidney disease, Tenofovir, ART, Progression

INTRODUCTION

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, is widely used in high-, middle-, and low-income countries around the world as part of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the treatment of HIV[1] and is arguably the most valuable drug currently available in our armamentarium against this dreaded virus. The most recent ART guidelines published by the World Health Organization recommend starting all eligible patients on a first-line regimen that includes TDF[2]. In addition to being used in treatment regimens, TDF has been recently approved in the United States as part of a pre-exposure prophylaxis regimen to prevent infection in people who are at risk for contracting HIV[3].

In manufacturer-sponsored randomized clinical trials, TDF was found to have a good safety profile and low toxicity [48]. However, concerns have since been raised with regard to its potential nephrotoxicity. TDF is chemically similar to adefovir and cidofovir, which both have clinically significant nephrotoxicity[9]. In addition, renal tubular toxicity was demonstrated in vitro and in animal models when high doses of TDF were administered. Furthermore, several cases of kidney dysfunction and/or acute kidney injury have been reported in TDF recipients[10].

In contrast to industry-sponsored clinical trials, U.S. and European observational cohort studies, retrospective reviews, and a meta-analysis by Hall and colleagues have reported kidney dysfunction associated with TDF use, have concluded that the reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR using Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations, is mild and of questionable clinical significance [1115]. These reports are contradicted by a Veterans Health Administration observational study of over 10,000 patients which reported that TDF use was associated with higher risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and rapid decline in kidney function when compared to other drug regimens [16].

Recent guidelines from the American HIV Medical Association and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommend biannual monitoring of kidney function in HIV-positive patients receiving a TDF-containing regimen[17]. In resource-limited settings, the need for frequent laboratory tests may limit the use of TDF[18]. Most studies described above included patients who were primarily male and were conducted in resource-rich settings. Therefore, these studies have limited usefulness in policy decisions regarding monitoring in resource-limited settings, where the use of TDF is the greatest. Less than a handful of such studies have been conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, where the HIV disease burden is highest, more women are HIV-positive, treatment is initiated when the disease is more advanced, and resources are limited [1820]. Furthermore, there are sketchy data on the incidence and predictors of kidney failure in patients receiving TDF-containing regimens in a “real world” clinical setting in sub-Saharan Africa [2123]. Given the prevalence of genetic susceptibility traits that place individuals of African descent at risk of kidney disease [24], especially HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) [25], more research is needed regarding the impact of TDF on kidney function; this information is crucial to guide clinicians, especially in view of the limited access to dialysis should patients develop kidney failure.

To that end, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of HIV-positive patients initiating TDF in South Africa. The aim of the study was to describe the incidence of kidney failure in patients receiving TDF-containing regimens in a “real world” clinical setting in a public hospital in South Africa, a country with one of the highest burdens of HIV and the greatest numbers of patients on antiretroviral therapy in the world.

METHODS

Study Design, Settings and Population

A retrospective cohort study of HIV-positive individuals initiating ART-containing TDF was conducted at the outpatient Infectious Diseases Clinic (IDC) at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. All patients in the cohort were ART-naïve HIV-positive adults who attended the IDC, between September 2010 and May 2013. Ethics committee approval for the study was obtained from Stellenbosch University and the University of Pittsburgh. All patients who received TDF and had a baseline serum creatinine measurement along with at least one follow-up creatinine measurement were included in the analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study Flow Diagram

Data Collection and Laboratory Analyses

Data were extracted from the IDC Microsoft Access Database which was created using a standardized data collection form following each patient visit. Missing data, incomplete data, and additional demographic and/or baseline information were abstracted from patient charts and laboratory results. Laboratory results for patients that were transferred to outside clinics following initiation of therapy were verified, and additional data on current ART regimen and patient weight at time of serum creatinine result were obtained from patient charts at these clinics, when available. The laboratory at Tygerberg Hospital performed the serum creatinine tests using an isotope dilution mass spectrometry traceable calibration method to standardize measurements.

Variables

Baseline variables collected included age, gender, height, weight, CD4+ T-cell count, hepatitis B virus surface antigen status, diagnosis of diabetes or hypertension (determined by whether patient was on medication(s) for the condition), and pre-existing kidney disease (determined by recorded diagnosis of kidney failure and/or at least one abnormal serum creatinine result based on local normal laboratory values).

Quantitative Variables

eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula[26] and the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD)[27] for standardized creatinine. Our primary analyses used eGFR based on the CKD-EPI formula, and the results were confirmed with the MDRD eGFR. For each patient, we estimated the rate of change (slope) of eGFR over time using two approaches: the least squares approach and the Bayesian approach. Long-term kidney function was evaluated in two ways: 1) rapid kidney function decline (RKFD); and 2) incident stage 3 CKD. Patients were classified as having RKFD if the estimated rate of kidney function decline exceeded −3 mL/min/year. We defined incident stage 3 CKD as the development of an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 during follow-up among patients who had an eGFR greater than or equal to 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline.

Statistical Analysis

We used the Bayesian model simulations to estimate the posterior probability of RKFD for each patient and summarized the distribution of these probabilities with a histogram. We compared mean differences in baseline characteristics between patients who had RKFD and those who did not using the t-test, or the rank-sum tests when the data were skewed. We compared differences in proportions between two groups using chi-square tests. We performed logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models to examine the associations between baseline demographic, clinical characteristics with the risk of RKFD and incidence of stage 3 CKD, respectively. Time to incident stage 3 CKD was calculated and described using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. For both models, bivariate analyses were used to investigate the unadjusted (crude) associations between each baseline or clinical characteristics and the risk of RKFD and incidence of stage 3 CKD.

Multivariable analyses were used to determine variables independently associated with the risk of RKFD and incidence of Stage 3 CKD. Variables with p-values less than 0.2 in the bivariate analyses were included in the multivariate model. We adjusted for patient’s age and gender irrespective of bivariate association. The results of the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were presented as odds ratio (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs), respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The proportionality assumption was confirmed by log-log plots and Schoenfeld residuals [28]. We checked for informative drop-out by plotting the distribution of eGFR values over drop-out time and time on TDF. The plot suggests that there is no evidence of informative censoring (eFigure 1).

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 13.1 statistical software (StataCorp, College Station, TX USA) except estimation of the Bayesian slopes which was performed using Rjags, a program for the statistical analysis of Bayesian hierarchical models by Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation in R statistical software [29]. The paper is reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [30].

RESULTS

Participants and Descriptive Data

Of 650 HIV-positive patients (426 women and 224 men) who initiated TDF, 361 (55%) experienced RKFD. The overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time on a TDF-containing regimen was 47 (19–69.3) weeks. Patients who developed RKFD were on a TDF-containing regimen for a median of 30 (IQR: 13.2–53.4) weeks and patients who did not develop RKFD were on a TDF-containing regimen for a median of 51.8 (IQR: 26–96.3) weeks. There were 1736 creatinine measurements among patients with RKFD compared to 1538 creatinine measurements among patients without RKFD. Overall, patients who developed RKFD were similar in mean baseline age, body mass index, and CD4+ T-cell count, and had similar incidence of diabetes, hypertension, and hepatitis B surface antigen seropositivity when compared to those who did not develop RKFD (Table 1). Conversely, individuals who had RKFD had lower mean baseline weight (62.8 vs. 65.3 kg, P=0.035) and higher mean baseline eGFR (116 vs. 111 ml/min/1.73 m2, P<0.001) than patients without RKFD.

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between Rapid Kidney Function Decliners (eGRF slope <-3 ml/min/yr) compared to Non-rapid Kidney Function Decliners (eGRF slope >= −3ml/min/yr).

Characteristic All patients (N=650)
n (%) or Mean ± SD or Median (IQR)
Rapid Kidney Function Decliners (N=361)
n (%) or Mean ± SD or Median (IQR)
Non-rapid Function Kidney Decliners (N=289)
n (%) or Mean ± SD or Median (IQR)
p-value
Age (yr) 37.9 ± 9.4 38.2 ± 9.3 37.5 ± 9.5 0.346
Female 426 (65.5) 247 (68.4) 179 (61.9) 0.084
BMI 24.9 ± 6.2 24.6 ± 6.2 25.3 ± 6.1) 0.169
Height (cm) 160.7 ± 10.5 160.2 ± 10.2 161.4 ± 11.0 0.198
Weight (kg) 63.9 ± 15.1 62.8 ± 15.1 65.3 ± 15.1 0.035
Diabetic 14 (2.2) 10 (2.8) 4 (1.4) 0.283
Hypertensive 51 (7.8) 27 (7.5) 24 (8.3) 0.697
History of renal failure 39 (6) 21 (5.8) 18 (6.2) 0.826
Hepatitis B surface Ag (+) 89 (13.7) 41 (11.4) 48 (16.6) 0.053
Creatinine clearance (mL/minute) 61.8 ± 16.0 58.1 ± 14.8 66.4 ± 16.2 < 0.001
eGFR – CK-EPI (mL/minute) 114 (102 – 123) 116 (107 – 125) 111 (96 – 120) <0.001WR
eGFR – MDRD (mL/minute) 108 (91 –126) 113 (96 – 134) 100 (84 – 117) <0.001WR
CD4 count 186 (112 – 260) 183 (102 – 267) 189 (129 – 243) 0.990WR

Outcome Data

eFigure 2 shows the smoothed eGFR profile over time on TDF-containing regimen separately for a random sample of patients. Overall, eGFR declined over time. The median change in eGFR was −3.53 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR: −9.94, 2.93) during follow-up. Based on the Bayesian estimates, 120 (18%) patients had positive estimated kidney function slopes while 530 (81%) had negative estimated kidney function slopes. The distribution of the Bayesian posterior probabilities of RKFD showed that thirty-eight patients had a probability of experiencing RKFD of at least 90% while 62 patients had a probability of RKFD of at least 80% (eFigure 3).

In the adjusted model, age, baseline eGFR, and history of pre-existing kidney disease were significantly, independently associated with RKFD (Table 2). For every 10-year increase in age or 10ml/min lower in baseline eGFR (CKD-EPI), a patient’s odds of RKFD increased by 70% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.13) and 57% (aOR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.80), respectively. Patients with history of pre-existing kidney disease were more than twice as likely to experience RKFD (aOR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.04 to 5.19) than patients without pre-existing kidney disease.

Table 2.

Factors associated with Rapid Kidney Function Decline (yearly changes < −/>=3 ml/min/yr) based on eGFR (CKDEPI) using Bayesian estimation.

Unadjusted Adjusted


OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Age (per 10 years) 1.08 (0.92 to 1.28) 0.346 1.70 (1.36 to 2.13) <0.001

Male (vs. female) 0.75 (0.54 to 1.04) 0.084 0.73 (0.51 to 1.04) 0.080

Baseline eGFR (per 10ml/min lower) 1.30 (1.18 to 1.43) <0.001 1.57 (1.38 to 1.80) <0.001

History of renal failure 1.82 (0.84 to 3.96) 0.129 2.33 (1.04 to 5.19) 0.038

History of diabetes 2.03 (0.63 to 6.54) 0.236

History of hypertension 0.89 (0.50 to 1.58) 0.698

History of renal failure 0.93 (0.48 to 1.78) 0.826

Hepatitis B surface Ag positive 0.64 (0.41 to 1.01) 0.054 0.68 (0.43 to 1.11) 0.122

Height (per 10cm increase) 0.90 (0.81 to 1.05) 0.198

Baseline weight (per 10kg increase) 0.89 (0.81 to 0.99) 0.036 0.95 (0.85 to 1.06) 0.324

Baseline CD4+ T-cell count (per (50 cells/cm3) 1.01 (0.94 to 1.08) 0.833

Body mass index 0.98 (0.96 to 1.01) 0.170

CD4- cluster of differentiation 4; CI confidence interval; eGFR- estimated glomerular filtration rate; OR- odds ratio

Fifteen of 650 (2%) patients progressed to stage 3 CKD during a median (IQR) follow-up time of 54 (46.6–98) weeks (Figure 2). Older age, female gender, lower baseline eGFR, and lower CD4 count were independently associated with development of stage 3 CKD in the adjusted model (Table 3). Each 10-year older age was associated with a 1.90-fold increased risk of developing stage 3 CKD (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.29). Women had an almost 4-fold greater risk of stage 3 CKD compared to men (aHR = 3.96, 95% CI: 1.06 to 14.74). A baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200/mm3 was associated with more than a 4-fold increased risk of stage 3 CKD compared to a CD4 count of 200/mm3 or greater (aHR = 4.54, 95% CI: 0.98 to 21.04) (Table 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Actuarial risk of progression to stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease

Table 3.

Factors significantly associated with risk of stage 3 CKD (Cox regression analysis

Characteristics Unadjusted
Adjusted
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Age, per 10 year older 2.46 (1.56 to 3.89) <0.001 1.90 (1.10 to 3.29) 0.021

Female vs. male 2.19 (0.62 to 7.75) 0.226 3.96 (1.06 to 14.74) 0.040

Baseline eGFR, per 10 ml/min higher 0.57 (0.42 to 0.76) <0.001 0.71 (0.51 to 1.00) 0.110

CD4 <200 vs. ≥200 cells/μL 4.59 (1.04 to 20.37) 0.044 4.54 (0.98 to 21.04) 0.053

History of diabetes 2.60 (0.34 to 19.88) 0.363

Hypertensive 2.53 (0.71 to 9.01) 0.153 0.80 (0.21 to 3.05) 0.757

History of abnormal creatinine 3.73 (1.05 to 13.22) 0.044 2.41 (0.59 to 9.89) 0.223

Hepatitis B surface Ag positive 2.27 (0.72 to 7.13) 0.162 2.30 (0.69 to 7.65) 0.176

Baseline weight (per 10kg increase) 0.82 (0.56 to 1.21) 0.317

Baseline height (per 10cm increase) 0.80 (0.50 to 1.26) 0.350

CD4- cluster of differentiation 4; CI confidence interval; eGFR- estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR- Hazard ratio

DISCUSSION

In this study of HIV-infected South Africans who initiated TDF-containing antiretroviral regimens, the great majority of individuals had negative eGFR slopes, and over half developed RKFD and only 2% developed stage 3 CKD during a median follow-up of approximately 30 and 54 weeks, respectively. The factors associated with greater likelihood of RKFD included older age, female gender and lower baseline eGFR. Our study quantifies the magnitude of risk for developing RKFD and stage 3 CKD among HIV-positive South African adults initiated on TDF-containing ART regimens.

Prior studies from sub-Saharan Africa have shown that kidney dysfunction is highly prevalent in HIV-infected individuals initiating ART. Studies set in Mwanza, Tanzania and Johannesburg, South Africa have shown that the prevalence of stage 2 CKD (eGFR 60 to 89 ml/min per 1.73 m) is 30–40% while the prevalence of stage 3 CKD (eGFR 30 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m) is estimated to be 5.2% to up to 25% [21, 22]. Much of the incident kidney dysfunction in TDF patients was related to preexisting renal disorder [21].

Our findings of general decline in kidney function with TDF-treatment build upon these findings by evaluating a population in which the great majority of patients had preserved kidney function. Also, our results are consistent with those published by Mulenga and colleagues [31]. Among more than 60,000 patients who initiated ART in Zambia, those with abnormal baseline kidney function on TDF-containing regimens had a lower eGFR at 6- and 12-month of follow-up and were 2- to 3-times more likely to progress to advanced kidney dysfunction when compared to patients not on TDF regimens.

In contrast, Kamkuemah and colleagues demonstrated that the overall eGFR improved by 1.10 ml/min/1.73 m2 over 12 months following TDF initiation among 1092 HIV-infected individuals residing in Cape Town, South Africa [32]. However, their study population was younger compared to our study population (mean 33 vs. 38 years, respectively), and the disparate observations across studies are likely due to differences in study population characteristics. Also, Bygrave and colleagues in Lesotho reported that among 933 HIV-infected initiating ART, 176 (18.9%) had a baseline creatinine clearance <50 ml/min and that renal function improve in all but only 3 of these patients [33]. However, their operational data were highly limited by missing data and lack of key covariates for the analysis. Similarly, secondary analyses from the Development of Antiretroviral Therapy Trial (DART) conducted in Zambia, Uganda, and Zimbabwe, by Reid and colleagues documented that mild-to-moderate baseline renal impairment was relatively common, but these participants had the greatest increases in eGFR after starting ART-containing TDF. However, severe eGFR impairment was infrequent regardless of ART regimen and was generally related to inter-current disease [19, 20].

Of note, the overall rate of eGFR decline on TDF was more rapid than previously reported in studies from the United States [34] or Europe [35]. The discrepancy with data from developed countries may be due to other prevalent co-morbidities (e.g. HIVAN, co-infection with Hepatitis B or parasites such as Schistosoma haematobium and mansoni) which have been shown to associated kidney dysfunction in sub-Saharan Africa [25, 3640]. Schistosomiasis has been associated with cystitis, obstructive uropathy, and immune-mediated glomerulonephritis, and may have contributed to the prevalent renal dysfunction [37, 40]. Therefore, one would not necessarily expect similar rate of eGFR decline in our study population as compare to high-income settings [34, 35, 41].

Our observation that a lower baseline kidney function was associated with higher risk of both RKFD and stage 3 CKD are consistent with several prior studies. Young and colleagues found that among 19 patients with pre-existing kidney disease (baseline median eGFR 49 ml/min/1.73 m2) in the HIV Outpatient Study, eGFR declined in 5 of 19 patients over a median follow-up period of 1 year[15]. Similarly, Brennan and colleagues demonstrated a stepwise increase in risk of any decline in kidney function secondary to TDF among HIV-infected South Africans. Compared to those with eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2, those with eGFR of 60–89 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 30–59 ml/min/1.73 m2 had a 4.8-fold and 15-fold higher risk, respectively, of acute or chronic kidney function decline [21]. The reasons for these differing observations are unclear, although they may be attributable to differences across study populations in the underlying cause of kidney dysfunction and ART-status prior to initiating TDF. For example, the study population examined by Brennan et al. was comprised predominantly of ART-exposed individuals who had switched to TDF.

Finally, our results demonstrate that older age was associated with higher odds of RKFD and higher risk of stage 3 CKD, whereas female gender was associated with higher risk of stage 3 CKD, as also reported by Msango and colleagues in Tanzania [22]. These observations may reflect the impact of age and gender on TDF circulating levels. Among HIV-infected women in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study, each decade older of age was associated with a 1.23 fold increase in TDF area under the curve (AUC) [42]. Although gender differences in TDF levels could not be assessed in the previous study, 10% incremental decreases in body mass index were also associated with a 1.04-fold higher TDF AUC [42]. In a report by Gervasoni and colleagues as well as Msango et al., low body mass index, particularly in HIV-positive women, was associated with higher risk of both TDF-related nephrotoxicity and bone toxicity [22, 43].

Our study has important clinical and research implications. While TDF-associated with CKD has been well-described among HIV-positive patients in developed countries, there has been a relative dearth of studies in low- and middle-income countries where limited resources present an impediment to both kidney function screening and monitoring. Our study, which utilized rigorous methodological approaches to assess longitudinal renal outcomes, represents one of the largest studies to date to assess TDF-related CKD risk in a resource-limited setting. Although the incidence of stage 3 CKD was small among TDF users, in a country like South Africa with the largest numbers of HIV-positive individuals on ART worldwide, the absolute numbers of patients with TDF nephrotoxicity is expected to be high. Therefore, with increasing use of TDF-containing regimens as first-line treatment for HIV infection in LMIC, studies such as ours highlight an urgent need to assess future approaches to CKD monitoring and management in these settings. We identified gender as an important predictor for CKD among HIV-positive South Africans receiving TDF. While gender differences in TDF exposure due to differences in body mass index may explain our observations, additional studies are needed to evaluate for gender-based differences in other factors that may alter TDF-exposure, such as treatment adherence. Future research should focus on whether or not simple diagnostic tools, such as the combination of serum creatinine–based GFR estimates and a urine dipstick, can cost-effectively identify patients at greatest risk of TDF-related toxicity [44].

While informative, however, our study has also several limitations. First, the follow-up time was relatively short. While most studies suggest that the greatest TDF-related decline in kidney function occurs within the first year of initiation, longitudinal studies in sub-Saharan Africa are needed to better assess the impact of long-term TDF exposure on renal and bone health outcomes[44]. Secondly, we were unable to assess for proximal tubular injury that may occur despite preserved eGFR. To inform future guidelines for kidney disease screening and monitoring among HIV-infected individuals exposed to TDF, studies with more sensitive biomarkers for kidney injury are needed [44]. In addition, we defined stage 3 CKD based on a single eGFR estimate below 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2; this may lead to greater misclassification of CKD status. Finally, this was a single-center study; therefore, our findings may not be generalizable to the remainder of sub-Saharan Africa that is highly variable with regard to access to care and kidney health assessments for HIV-infected individuals.

In conclusion, we showed that TDF was associated with both a higher likelihood of RKFD and Stage 3 CKD among HIV-infected South Africans. While the majority of individuals experienced RKFD in our study, only a small minority developed Stage 3 CKD. Therefore, approaches that provide balanced allocation of limited resources towards screening and monitoring for kidney dysfunction and HIV disease management are critically needed in this setting.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

Research Grant Support: Hadas Zachor (NIH/NIDDK T35-DK-065521-09); Rhoderick Machekano (NIH/FIC 1D71-TW009758-01); Michelle M. Estrella (NIH/NIDDK-1K23-DK-081317; Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR, P30A1094189]); Olalekan A. Uthman (FAS Marie Curie International Post-Doc Award #2012-0064); Jean B Nachega (PEPFAR-HRSA:T84HA21652; Wellcome Trust: WT087537MA; NIH/NIAID: 2UM1AI069521-08).

Conference Presentation: This paper was presented at the World Congress of Nephrology, March 13–17, 2015, Cape Town, South Africa. (http://www.wcn2015.org/)

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE:

All the authors declared no competing interest.

References

  • 1.Cooper RD, Wiebe N, Smith N, Keiser P, Naicker S, Tonelli M. Systematic review and meta-analysis: renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:496–505. doi: 10.1086/655681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Summary of new recommendations: Consolidated ARV guidelines, June 2013. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/prevention/research/prep/ [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arribas JR, Pozniak AL, Gallant JE, Dejesus E, Gazzard B, Campo RE, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz compared with zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients: 144-week analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47:74–78. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31815acab8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barditch-Crovo P, Deeks SG, Collier A, Safrin S, Coakley DF, Miller M, et al. Phase i/ii trial of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiretroviral activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:2733–2739. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2733-2739.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cheng AK, Chen SS, Wulfsohn M, Toole JJ. 2 Year Long Term Safety Profile of Tenofovir DF (TDF) in TreatmentExperienced Patients from Randomized, Double-Blind, PlaceboControlled Clinical Trials. 9th European AIDS Conference; Warsaw, Poland. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, DeJesus E, Suleiman JM, Miller MD, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:191–201. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sax PE, Gallant JE, Klotman PE. Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. AIDS Read. 2007;17:90–92. 99–104, C103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cihlar T, Ho ES, Lin DC, Mulato AS. Human renal organic anion transporter 1 (hOAT1) and its role in the nephrotoxicity of antiviral nucleotide analogs. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2001;20:641–648. doi: 10.1081/NCN-100002341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Izzedine H, Isnard-Bagnis C, Hulot JS, Vittecoq D, Cheng A, Jais CK, et al. Renal safety of tenofovir in HIV treatment-experienced patients. AIDS. 2004;18:1074–1076. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200404300-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guaraldi G, Roverato A, Giovanardi C, Ravera F, Squillace N, Orlando G, et al. Glomerular filtration rates in HIV-infected patients treated with and without tenofovir: a prospective, observational study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:374–379. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hall AM, Hendry BM, Nitsch D, Connolly JO. Tenofovir-associated kidney toxicity in HIV-infected patients: a review of the evidence. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:773–780. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Horberg M, Tang B, Towner W, Silverberg M, Bersoff-Matcha S, Hurley L, et al. Impact of tenofovir on renal function in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53:62–69. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181be6be2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Madeddu G, Bonfanti P, De Socio GV, Carradori S, Grosso C, Marconi P, et al. Tenofovir renal safety in HIV-infected patients: results from the SCOLTA Project. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Young B, Buchacz K, Baker RK, Moorman AC, Wood KC, Chmiel J, et al. Renal function in Tenofovir-exposed and Tenofovir-unexposed patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in the HIV Outpatient Study. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) 2007;6:178–187. doi: 10.1177/1545109707300676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scherzer R, Estrella M, Li Y, Choi AI, Deeks SG, Grunfeld C, et al. Association of tenofovir exposure with kidney disease risk in HIV infection. AIDS. 2012;26:867–875. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328351f68f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aberg JA, Gallant JE, Ghanem KG, Emmanuel P, Zingman BS, Horberg MA, et al. Primary care guidelines for the management of persons infected with HIV: 2013 update by the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1–10. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Calmy A, Klement E, Teck R, Berman D, Pecoul B, Ferradini L. Simplifying and adapting antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: a necessary step to scaling-up. AIDS. 2004;18:2353–2360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reid A, Stohr W, Walker AS, Williams IG, Kityo C, Hughes P, et al. Severe renal dysfunction and risk factors associated with renal impairment in HIV-infected adults in Africa initiating antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1271–1281. doi: 10.1086/533468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stohr W, Walker AS, Munderi P, Tugume S, Gilks CF, Darbyshire JH, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in HIV-infected adults in Africa: comparison of Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulae. Antivir Ther. 2008;13:761–770. doi: 10.1177/135965350801300613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brennan A, Evans D, Maskew M, Naicker S, Ive P, Sanne I, et al. Relationship between renal dysfunction, nephrotoxicity and death among HIV adults on tenofovir. AIDS. 2011;25:1603–1609. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834957da. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Msango L, Downs JA, Kalluvya SE, Kidenya BR, Kabangila R, Johnson WD, Jr, et al. Renal dysfunction among HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy. Aids. 2011;25:1421–1425. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328348a4b1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mulenga L, Musonda P, Mwango A, Vinikoor MJ, Davies MA, Mweemba A, et al. Effect of baseline renal function on tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy outcomes in Zambia. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1473–1480. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Limou S, Nelson GW, Kopp JB, Winkler CA. APOL1 kidney risk alleles: population genetics and disease associations. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2014;21:426–433. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kasembeli AN, Duarte R, Ramsay M, Mosiane P, Dickens C, Dix-Peek T, et al. APOL1 Risk Variants Are Strongly Associated with HIV-Associated Nephropathy in Black South Africans. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014050469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schoenfeld D. Partial Residuals for The Proportional Hazards Regression Model. Biometrika. 1982;69:239–241. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Plummer M. JAGS: A Program for Analysis of Bayesian Graphical Models Using Gibbs Sampling. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003). March 20–22; Vienna, Austria. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:W163–194. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mulenga LB, Kruse G, Lakhi S, Cantrell RA, Reid SE, Zulu I, et al. Baseline renal insufficiency and risk of death among HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy in Lusaka, Zambia. AIDS. 2008;22:1821–1827. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328307a051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kamkuemah M, Kaplan R, Bekker LG, Little F, Myer L. Renal impairment in HIV-infected patients initiating tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy regimens in a Primary Healthcare Setting in South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2015;20:518–526. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bygrave H, Kranzer K, Hilderbrand K, Jouquet G, Goemaere E, Vlahakis N, et al. Renal safety of a tenofovir-containing first line regimen: experience from an antiretroviral cohort in rural Lesotho. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kalayjian RC, Lau B, Mechekano RN, Crane HM, Rodriguez B, Salata RA, et al. Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in a large cohort of HIV-1 infected individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy in routine care. AIDS. 2012;26:1907–1915. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328357f5ed. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rasch MG, Engsig FN, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Kirk O, Kronborg G, Pedersen C, et al. Renal function and incidence of chronic kidney disease in HIV patients: a Danish cohort study. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44:689–696. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.673730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Doehring E, Ehrich JH, Vester U, Feldmeier H, Poggensee U, Brodehl J. Proteinuria, hematuria, and leukocyturia in children with mixed urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis. Kidney Int. 1985;28:520–525. doi: 10.1038/ki.1985.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Martinelli R, Noblat AC, Brito E, Rocha H. Schistosoma mansoni-induced mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis: influence of therapy. Kidney Int. 1989;35:1227–1233. doi: 10.1038/ki.1989.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mweemba A, Zanolini A, Mulenga L, Emge D, Chi BH, Wandeler G, et al. Chronic hepatitis B virus coinfection is associated with renal impairment among Zambian HIV-infected adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1757–1760. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Salako BL, Ayodele OE, Kadiri S, Arije A. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses in pre-dialysis patients with chronic renal failure. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2002;31:311–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sobh MA, Moustafa FE, el-Housseini F, Basta MT, Deelder AM, Ghoniem MA. Schistosomal specific nephropathy leading to end-stage renal failure. Kidney Int. 1987;31:1006–1011. doi: 10.1038/ki.1987.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choi AI, Shlipak MG, Hunt PW, Martin JN, Deeks SG. HIV-infected persons continue to lose kidney function despite successful antiretroviral therapy. Aids. 2009;23:2143–2149. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283313c91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Baxi SM, Greenblatt RM, Bacchetti P, Scherzer R, Minkoff H, Huang Y, et al. Common clinical conditions - age, low BMI, ritonavir use, mild renal impairment - affect tenofovir pharmacokinetics in a large cohort of HIV-infected women. AIDS. 2014;28:59–66. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gervasoni C, Meraviglia P, Landonio S, Baldelli S, Fucile S, Castagnoli L, et al. Low body weight in females is a risk factor for increased tenofovir exposure and drug-related adverse events. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Estrella MM, Moosa MR, Nachega JB. Editorial commentary: Risks and benefits of tenofovir in the context of kidney dysfunction in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1481–1483. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES