Abstract
Erectile dysfunction is a multidimensional but common male sexual dysfunction that involves an alteration in any of the components of the erectile response, including organic, relational and psychological. Roles for nonendocrine (neurogenic, vasculogenic and iatrogenic) and endocrine pathways have been proposed. Owing to its strong association with metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease, cardiac assessment may be warranted in men with symptoms of erectile dysfunction. Minimally invasive interventions to relieve the symptoms of erectile dysfunction include lifestyle modifications, oral drugs, injected vasodilator agents and vacuum erection devices. Surgical therapies are reserved for the subset of patients who have contraindications to these nonsurgical interventions, those who experience adverse effects from (or are refractory to) medical therapy and those who also have penile fibrosis or penile vascular insufficiency. Erectile dysfunction can have deleterious effects on a man’s quality of life; most patients have symptoms of depression and anxiety related to sexual performance. These symptoms, in turn, affect his partner’s sexual experience and the couple’s quality of life. This Primer highlights numerous aspects of erectile dysfunction, summarizes new treatment targets and ongoing preclinical studies that evaluate new pharmacotherapies, and covers the topic of regenerative medicine, which represents the future of sexual medicine.
The erect penis has always been a symbol of a man’s virility and sexual prowess. Although it is not a lethal condition, the interest surrounding erectile dysfunction and its remedies has been constant throughout the ages1–5 (FIG. 1). Erectile dysfunction is the inability to achieve or maintain an erection that is sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance, and affects a considerable proportion of men at least occasionally1. Two major aspects of the male erection, the reflex erection and psychogenic erection, can be involved in the dysfunction and are subject to therapeutic intervention: the reflex erection is achieved by directly touching the penile shaft and is under the control of the peripheral nerves and the lower parts of the spinal cord; and the psychogenic erection is achieved by erotic or emotional stimuli, and uses the limbic system of the brain. The severity of erectile dysfunction is often described as mild, moderate or severe according to the five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire, with a score of 1–7 indicating severe, 8–11 moderate, 12–16 mild–moderate, 17–21 mild and 22–25 no erectile dysfunction.
In the past, erectile dysfunction was considered, in most cases, to be a purely psychogenic disorder, but current evidence suggests that more than 80% of cases have an organic aetiology. Causes of organic erectile dysfunction can now be broadly divided into nonendocrine and endocrine. Of the nonendocrine aetiologies, vasculogenic (affecting blood supply) is the most common and can involve arterial inflow disorders and abnormalities of venous outflow (corporeal veno-occlusion); there are also neurogenic (affecting innervation and nervous function) and iatrogenic (relating to a medical or surgical treatment) aetiologies. In terms of endocrine factors leading to erectile dysfunction, reduced serum testosterone levels have been implicated, but the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Often, organic erectile dysfunction involves a psychological component; that is, regardless of the precipitating event, erectile dysfunction imposes negative effects on interpersonal relationships, mood and quality of life.
Importantly, erectile dysfunction is no longer simply confined to sexual activities but acts as an indicator of systemic endothelial dysfunction1. From a clinical standpoint, erectile dysfunction often precedes cardiovascular events and can be used as an early marker to identify men at high risk of major cardiovascular disease6. In this Primer, we describe the different aetiologies of erectile dysfunction and the currently available treatments.
Epidemiology
Several studies have explored the epidemiology of erectile dysfunction by considering different settings and populations. Given that erectile dysfunction is regarded as a condition that is more prevalent in older men, two milestone studies have provided valuable results in this setting: the Massachusetts Male Ageing Study (MMAS) and the European Male Ageing Study (EMAS)7,8. The MMAS showed a combined prevalence of mild to moderate erectile dysfunction of 52% in men aged 40–70 years; erectile dysfunction was strongly related to age, health status and emotional function7. Conversely, the EMAS, the largest European multicentre population-based study of ageing men (40–79 years), reported a prevalence of erectile dysfunction ranging from 6% to 64% depending on different age subgroups and increasing with age, with an average prevalence of 30% (REF. 8) (FIG. 2). Few studies have evaluated erectile dysfunction prevalence worldwide9–12. What emerges from these studies is a systematically higher prevalence of erectile dysfunction in the United States and eastern and southeastern Asian countries than in Europe or South America. Several factors can account for these differences, including cultural or socioeconomic variables; however, further studies are required to identify and discriminate possible genetic influences from environmental impact. Data on erectile dysfunction incidence are less abundant; new cases range from 19 to 66 per 1,000 men every year in studies in the United States, Brazil and the Netherlands13–15. However, these results are not robust owing to short follow-up duration, as well as heterogeneity of the ages and limited geographical locations of the participants.
Epidemiological data have indicated a strong association between erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); LUTS are associated with urinary obstruction caused by benign enlargement of the prostate. This association is maintained even after adjusting for potential confounding factors, such as age and comorbid conditions9,15,16. Both erectile dysfunction and LUTS in those with BPH have a high prevalence in ageing men and have common risk factors, such as hypertension and cardiovascular disorders, cigarette smoking, obesity, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, stress, anxiety and depression17.
Despite being studied thoroughly in men over 40 years of age18, the prevalence of erectile dysfunction in younger men is rarely regarded as interesting19,20. In this context, a recent naturalistic study (a study in which the participant is observed without any manipulation by the researcher) reported that one man out of four seeking medical help for erectile dysfunction in the real-life setting is <40 years of age21. Moreover, another study showed that 22.1% of men <40 years of age had low (<21) Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores22. Studies evaluating erectile dysfunction epidemiology in a younger population will help to clarify the prevalence and incidence in this age group. Although the data are mainly focused on real-life experiences of clinicians, and not supported by population-based studies, it is likely that most cases of erectile dysfunction in younger men have a psychogenic basis. In this context, clues to suggest a psychogenic aetiology usually include sudden onset, good quality spontaneous or self-stimulated erections, major life events or previous psychological problems. However, these factors should not disregard the importance of the components of distress and discomfort that are brought by the onset and persistence of erectile dysfunction and by problems related to sexuality. Such components include anxiety and alexithymia (lack of emotional awareness) and even the possibility that, perhaps especially in younger patients, erectile dysfunction can be both a symptom and a sentinel marker of serious organic problems20,23–26.
Mechanisms/pathophysiology
The penis remains in its flaccid state when the smooth muscle is contracted. The smooth muscle contraction is regulated by a combination of adrenergic (noradrenaline) control, intrinsic myogenic control and endothelium-derived contracting factors (prostaglandin and endothelins; FIG. 3)27–29. Upon sexual stimulation, erection occurs after nitric oxide (NO) is released from non-adrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) nerve fibres and acetylcholine is released from parasympathetic cholinergic nerve fibres (FIG. 4); the result of the ensuing signalling pathways is increased cyclic GMP (cGMP) concentrations, decreased intracellular Ca2+ levels and smooth muscle cell relaxation29,30. As the smooth muscle relaxes, blood is able to fill the lacunar spaces in the corpora cavernosa, leading to compression of the subtunical venules, thereby blocking the venous outflow (veno-occlusion). The process is reversed as cGMP is hydrolysed by phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5)29,30. Erectile dysfunction can occur when any of these processes is interrupted.
Psychogenic erectile dysfunction
Non-organic erectile dysfunction is also known as psychogenic or adrenaline-mediated erectile dysfunction (noradrenaline-mediated or sympathetic-mediated erectile dysfunction). It has not been well studied but is an important factor to consider when evaluating and managing men with this condition. Stress, depression and anxiety are generally defined as heightened anxiety related to the inability to achieve and maintain an erection before or during sexual relations, and are commonly associated with psychogenic erectile dysfunction (BOX 1). This association is unsurprising, given that noradrenaline is the primary erectolytic (anti-erectile) neurotransmitter31 (FIG. 3).
Box 1. Symptoms of erectile dysfunction.
Psychogenic
Sudden onset
Intermittent function (variability, situational)
Loss of sustaining capability
Excellent nocturnal erection
Response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors is likely to be excellent
Organic
Gradual onset
Often progressive
Consistently poor response
Erection better in standing position than lying down (in the presence of venous leak)
Nonendocrine causes
Neurogenic
Neurogenic erectile dysfunction is caused by a deficit in nerve signalling to the corpora cavernosa. Such deficits can be secondary to, for example, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, lumbar disc disease, traumatic brain injury, radical pelvic surgery (radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, abdominoperineal resection) and diabetes. Upper motor neuron lesions (above spinal nerve T10) do not result in local changes in the penis but can inhibit the central nervous system (CNS)-mediated control of the erection. By contrast, sacral lesions (S2–S4 are typically responsible for reflexogenic erections) cause functional and structural alterations owing to the decreased innervation32. The functional change resulting from such injuries is the reduction in NO load that is available to the smooth muscle. The structural changes centre on apoptosis of the smooth muscle and endothelial cells of the blood vessels, as well as upregulation of fibrogenetic cytokines that lead to collagenization of the smooth muscle. These changes result in veno-occlusive dysfunction (venous leak)33–37.
Vasculogenic
Vascular disease and endothelial dysfunction lead to erectile dysfunction through reduced blood inflow, arterial insufficiency or arterial stenosis. Vasculogenic erectile dysfunction is by far the most common aetiology of organic erectile dysfunction. Indeed, erectile dysfunction can be a manifestation of an underlying vascular disorder. The risk of developing vasculogenic erectile dysfunction is increased in men with hypertension (odds ratio (OR) of 3.04 for those on anti-hypertensive medication, and 1.35 for those not on medication), diabetes (OR 2.57) and dyslipidaemia (OR 1.83)38–41. Cigarette smoking has also been shown to increase the risk of erectile dysfunction (OR 1.4)39,40,42, although smoking cessation can reduce the risk32. Vasculogenic erectile dysfunction does not develop from high blood pressure itself but is secondary to the arterial wall changes (decreased elasticity) in response to the increase in blood pressure. In addition, atherosclerosis related to diabetes, dyslipidaemia and/or cigarette smoking can lead to arterial stenosis and compound the vascular injury.
Hypoxia from decreased corpora cavernosal oxygenation can cause a decrease in prostaglandin E1 levels, which normally inhibit pro-fibrotic cytokines, such as transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1)43. These pro-fibrotic cytokines promote collagen deposition, replacing the smooth muscle and resulting in decreased elasticity of the penis, as has been shown in several rat models44. As the smooth muscle to collagen ratio decreases and collagen content increases, the ability of the cavernosa to compress the subtunical veins decreases, leading to corporal veno-occlusive dysfunction45.
Iatrogenic
The most common iatrogenic cause of erectile dysfunction is radical pelvic surgery. Generally, the damage that occurs during these procedures is primarily neurogenic in nature (cavernous nerve injury) but accessory pudendal artery injury can also contribute46. Pelvic fractures can also cause erectile dysfunction in a similar manner, owing to nerve distraction injury and arterial trauma.
Various medications have also been shown to be associated with the development of erectile dysfunction40 (BOX 2). Medications that are used to treat hypertension (thiazide diuretics and β-blockers) are most commonly associated with erectile dysfunction, but others, including psychotherapeutics, anti-androgens, anti-ulcer drugs, opiates and digoxin, have also been linked with the condition40. However, whether the erectile dysfunction results directly from the medication itself or the underlying disease — for example, hypertension — is difficult to define. The Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) compared five anti-hypertensive drugs with a placebo for changes in quality of life (sexual function was ascertained by physician interviews)47. Chlorthalidone (a diuretic drug used to treat hypertension) had the greatest effect on sexual function at 2 years after treatment, but the placebo achieved almost the same level at 4 years. Accordingly, chlorthalidone may potentiate erectile dysfunction earlier in those who are likely to develop the condition later in life.
Box 2. Medications associated with erectile dysfunction.
Thiazide diuretics, β-blockers and spironolactone used to treat hypertension
Digoxin used to treat atrial fibrillation
5α-reductase inhibitors used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia
Anti-androgens used to treat prostate cancer
Luteinizing hormone-releasing agonists and antagonists used to treat prostate cancer
Tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics and phenytoin used to treat depression and other psychiatric conditions
H2 blockers used to treat ulcers
Opiates used to treat pain
Endocrine causes
Androgens are considered the major hormonal regulator of penile development and physiology48,49; however, the role of testosterone replacement therapy in erectile dysfunction is controversial because of discrepancies in the findings from clinical trials, and the fact that both hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction are common in ageing. The increasing association of erectile dysfunction and the progressive decline of androgen levels with ageing does not necessarily imply a causal link.
Most early studies aiming to understand the role of reduced testosterone on erectile function focused on androgen ablation — a model that cannot be easily translated to erectile dysfunction in humans50,51. From these studies and metabolic models, three sites of action for androgens have been described: the nuclei in the CNS52, the spinal neurons and pelvic ganglia, and the genital tissues53 (FIG. 5). Part of the erectile response to testosterone is mediated through sexual desire (the male sex drive depends on testosterone), but mechanistic studies have documented a direct role of testosterone on cavernous smooth muscle cells, involving NO, RHO-associated protein kinase (ROCK), PDE5 and the adrenergic response.
Effects on smooth muscle cells
All animal studies support the idea that castration (reduction in testosterone levels) causes a rapid drop in intracavernous pressure, owing to both reduced arterial inflow and altered veno-occlusion during stimulated erections54 — castration is associated with a rapid reduction in neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)55 and pelvic ganglion activity56. However, in models of hypogonadism or in castration, the effects of testosterone replacement on nNOS have been variable, with some studies revealing increased expression but unaltered activity, and other studies showing no effect55,57. Studies carried out in animals treated with l-NG-nitroargininemethyl ester (l-NAME, a NOS inhibitor) revealed that androgens trigger additional, NO-independent mechanisms that still require intact cGMP generation to control veno-occlusion58. That is, androgens require cGMP to produce an erection, which suggests that androgens modulate the erectile response through redundant mechanisms that involve cGMP generation.
Among these NO-independent targets is the ROCK pathway59, which contributes to tonic smooth muscle cell contraction via calcium sensitization (FIG. 3a). Hypogonadism has been shown to induce activation of ROCK1 (REF. 51), which counteracts smooth muscle cell relaxation. However, hypogonadism does not activate ROCK2, which is increased in response to testosterone in endothelial cells60. Additional studies are necessary to understand the role of androgens in ROCK-dependent modulation of erection.
NO-independent, pro-erectile mechanisms of androgens also include regulation of expression of smooth muscle myosin isoforms61 and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)62,63 binding to its natural receptors: a family of G protein-coupled receptors that are widely expressed in the cardiovascular system. S1P receptor activation sustains constriction of smooth muscle cells via phospholipase C (which cleaves phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) into inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (Ins(1,4,5)P3), leading to increased Ca2+) and the ROCK pathways. In endothelial cells, SIP receptor activation triggers the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–AKT pathway, enabling crosstalk between the ROCK and the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) pathways61. The latter findings reinforce a beneficial role of androgens on several overlapping NO-independent pathways (SIP, PI3K–AKT and ROCK) favouring erectile response.
Several in vitro studies using animal and human tissues have shown that PDE5 expression is upregulated by androgens57,64,65. However, recent studies have questioned this evidence, suggesting that low PDE5 in hypogonadism simply reflects the overall reduction in smooth muscle cell content66. Indeed, androgen deprivation triggers apoptosis of smooth muscle cells, extracellular matrix deposition57 and accumulation of lipid droplets in mesenchymeal cells (especially in the subtunical region) contributing to impaired veno-occlusion67. In general, cGMP levels, regulated by the activity of PDE5 (the primary enzyme involved in cGMP degradation), seem crucial for any direct57,64,65 or indirect68 androgenic regulation within the penis58.
A recognized mechanism of action of testosterone in particular is the regulation of α1-adrenergic responsiveness of smooth muscle cells57,69. Castration in animals has also been shown to be associated with a decreased density of NANC innervating fibres and reduced NANC-mediated relaxation in isolated corpora cavernosa strips57. These data suggest an effect of testosterone on the postganglionic parasympathetic neurons, or even further upstream within the autonomic nervous system53. In line with this hypothesis, the effects of castration on penile haemodynamics, including NOS activity, can be transiently reversed in vivo by short-term electrical stimulation of the cavernosal nerve55. Accordingly, androgens might be necessary to support adequate neuronal stimulation to the corpora cavernosa, maintaining tissue structural integrity; denervation, as can occur following prostate surgery, and castration share some histological similarities53.
Hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction
Further evidence for the role of androgens in erectile dysfunction comes from clinical studies. In the 1980s, Bancroft performed pivotal studies to discriminate central effects from peripheral effects of testosterone replacement therapy. He showed that in acute settings, erectile capacity in response to visual stimulation is less sensitive to androgen than sexual interest, fantasies and cognitive sexual activities70. That is, androgen enhances the sexual response to sexual fantasy more than it enhances the response to visual stimuli, which has implications for the kind of sexual activity measured in the research setting. Experimental endogenous hypogonadism induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists71 in supraphysiological-dose studies72 generated the threshold hypothesis, confirmed by epidemiological data, that at least 8 nmol l−1 of testosterone in sera is required for erectile function. However, some hypogonadal men retain near-normal sexual activity despite very low testosterone levels73. In young adults, the androgen dependency of erectile function is maintained at threshold values that are far below those required to maintain the function of other target organs (that is, <8 nmol l−1 or 230 ng dl−1). However, erectile function despite low androgen levels may not apply to elderly men who have comorbidities, possibly owing to changes in androgen receptor expression and activity. To match testosterone levels to an individual’s own requirement, the concept of compensated or subclinical hypogonadism74 has been introduced (FIG. 6). In this setting, it is suggested that when testosterone declines from a previously higher level, a rise in the levels of luteinizing hormone might be a biomarker for insufficient androgenization74,75.
Other evidence for a role of testosterone in erectile dysfunction comes from clinical trial data on testosterone replacement therapy. The few available randomized clinical trials addressing the roles of treatment with testosterone in erectile dysfunction have been extensively reviewed, with the largest and most updated meta-analysis confirming significant beneficial effects on various domains of erectile function, but only in men with testosterone levels of less than 12 nmol l−1 (345 ng dl−1) at baseline76. Regression and subgroup analyses emphasized a role of ageing as a possible moderator of responsiveness to testosterone in those with erectile dysfunction76. Another relevant emerging aspect is the time course of testosterone effects (that is, the length of treatment necessary to achieve the maximum result). A recent systematic review77 and randomized clinical trials78–80 revealed that although the effects on libido, ejaculation and sexual activity were apparent within just 2–3 weeks of commencing treatment, the effects on erectile function may take up to 6–12 months to be evident. Recently, the largest and longest trial addressing the effects of testosterone replacement therapy on subclinical atherosclerosis progression in older men showed no significant difference in IIEF score compared with the placebo at 18 months or 36 months after the start of treatment. However, erectile dysfunction was not an inclusion criterion for the trial, and the relatively high baseline total IIEF score suggests that only some of the participants had erectile dysfunction at enrolment81.
Several studies have recently reported growing concerns regarding the safety of sex steroid replacement therapy (in men and women). These studies questioned the physiological roles of the various hormones, and purposefully sought to amplify some sort of ‘hormonophobia’ by exaggerating or misrepresenting safety concerns82. However, leaving aside the controversies surrounding both the alarming83 and reassuring studies84 — contrasts that impose a risk–benefit evaluation before any treatment — it seems clear that these considerations neither apply to young adults with hypogonadism80 nor question the physiological role of testosterone in erectile function.
Finally, little data have addressed the roles of other hormones in erectile dysfunction85. Indeed, possible roles have been documented for thyroid hormones, prolactin, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1, dehydroepiandrosterone and oxytocin. Although these hormones play a part in the pathophysiology of erection, their epidemiological impact is likely to be small and is awaiting confirmation. After testosterone, prolactin is the most commonly altered hormone in men with sexual dysfunction; its main effect is to inhibit gonadotropin secretion to induce hypogonadism. Thus, prolactin should be considered for screening, together with testosterone and luteinizing hormone (FIG. 6), in men with erectile dysfunction.
Diagnosis, screening and prevention
Risk factors
The identification of the pathogenetic factors involved in erectile dysfunction is the cornerstone of an accurate diagnosis and successful treatment.
Lifestyle factors and diabetes
Alcohol and smoking habits have consistently been shown to affect erectile function. Evidence from observational studies suggests a positive dose–response association between quantity and duration of smoking and the risk of erectile dysfunction86,87. Similar results have been documented for alcohol abuse88. In addition, diets that are low in whole-grain foods, legumes, vegetables and fruits, and high in red meat, full-fat dairy products, and sugary foods and beverages are all associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction89. Finally, meta-analysis of available evidence demonstrates that moderate and more frequent physical activity are associated with reduced risk of erectile dysfunction90. Accordingly, both cross-sectional and prospective epidemiological studies suggest that obesity and metabolic syndrome are associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction91. It is conceivable that obesity-associated hypogonadism and increased cardiovascular risk are correlated with the higher prevalence of erectile dysfunction in overweight and obese men (see below). However, recent clinical and experimental studies suggest that the association between erectile dysfunction and central obesity is independent from obesity-associated comorbidities and hypogonadism91. Although increased levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF; also known as TNFα) — a cytokine involved in systemic inflammation — could be a mediator of these conditions92, further studies are needed to confirm this. Sexual health is impaired by type 1 and type 2 diabetes and even by a pre-diabetic status93–95. Peripheral neuropathy, atherosclerosis of large blood vessels, endothelial dysfunction of arterioles and the associated hypogonadism all contribute to diabetes-related sexual dysfunction93–95.
Cardiovascular disease
Arteriogenic erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease are considered different manifestations of a common underlying vascular disorder. Three independent meta-analyses have documented that erectile dysfunction needs to be considered the harbinger of coronary heart disease96–98 and as a predictor of future silent cardiac events99. This association is particularly important in younger men (<55 years of age) and those with erectile dysfunction and no other comorbidites98, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and correct management of erectile dysfunction-associated morbidities. Accordingly, the Princeton III Consensus Recommendations for the management of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease indicate that incident erectile dysfunction has a similar, or even greater, predictive value for cardiovascular disease than traditional risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia or smoking100.
BPH and LUTS
The presence of LUTS alongside BPH represents another important issue in men with erectile dysfunction. The Multinational Survey of The Ageing Male (MSAM-7) study — a multinational survey conducted in the United States and six European countries — demonstrated that the presence of LUTS is an independent risk factor for erectile dysfunction, although the pathological reason for this association is unclear9. Common alterations in the NO–cGMP pathway, enhancement of RHOA–ROCK signalling and pelvic atherosclerosis are often considered the most important mechanisms involved in determining the two conditions.
Psychogenic and relationship factors
Aside from organic factors, psychogenic and relationship domains need to be evaluated in men with symptoms of erectile dysfunction. All sexual dysfunctions, even the most documented organic types (such as diabetes-associated erectile dysfunction), are stressful and can lead to psychological disturbances101. Performance anxiety is a common issue in men with sexual dysfunction, often leading to avoidance of sex, loss of self-esteem and depression101. Psychiatric symptoms are often comorbid in patients with erectile dysfunction101. In addition, many psychotropic drugs can induce erectile and other sexual problems101.
Although considered less often, the quality of a relationship represents an essential determinant of successful sexual activity. In fact, any sexual dysfunction in one member of the couple will affect the couple as a whole, causing distress, partner issues and further exacerbation of the original sexual problem (see below)102. Interestingly, a patient’s perception of reduced partner interest represents an independent predictor of incident cardiovascular events103. Hence, the physical relationship between partners should be considered not only as enjoyable, but also as a strategy for improving overall health and life expectancy.
Diagnostic work-up
The basic work-up of patients seeking medical care for erectile dysfunction needs to include an evaluation of all the aforementioned factors, including: establishing an accurate medical and sexual history; a careful general and focused genitourinary examination; and a minimum number of hormonal and routine biochemical tests (FIG. 7). Other optional tests can be considered in specific situations (see below).
Given the personal, interpersonal, social and occupational implications of sexual dysfunction, assessing sexual history is not an easy task. Finding the correct way to ask questions and ‘decode’ answers on sexual health and illnesses is necessary to avoid embarrassing the patient. Hence, expert-guided, validated and standardized sexual inventories — structured interviews and self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) — can help both inexperienced and seasoned clinicians to address sexual health and related conditions104. Both structured interviews and SRQs are composed of a set of standardized questions requiring a finite response. Several SRQs have been published, mainly focusing on evaluating erectile dysfunction severity (for example, the IIEF) or erectile dysfunction treatment outcomes (for example, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory for Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS))104. Structured interviews are generally considered a more reliable instrument than SRQs in evaluating sexual history and causes of erectile dysfunction, as they tend to achieve a closer patient– physician relationship and reduce the risk of misunderstanding. So far, the only validated structured interview on erectile dysfunction that has demonstrated sufficient utility in several clinical studies is the Structured Interview on Erectile Dysfunction (SIEDY)104. SIEDY is a 13-item interview composed of three scales that identify and quantify important domains in men with erectile dysfunction (organic, scale 1; marital, scale 2; and intrapsychic, scale 3).
The physical examination of patients includes evaluation of the chest (including heart rhythm, breathing and signs of gynaecomastia (enlargement of the breasts)), penis, prostate and testes, and of the distribution of body hair105. Small testes and/or small prostate volume, according to the patient’s age, might imply underlying hypogonadism. Similarly, other possible signs of hypogonadism include gynaecomastia as well as a decrease in beard and body hair growth. Assessment of the peripheral vascular system is also important to determine the characteristics of the pulse, to ascertain the presence of an arterial bruit (a vascular sound that is associated with turbulent blood flow). Increased pulse rate (tachycardia) might suggest hyperthyroidism, whereas reduced pulse rate (bradycardia) might be evident in men with heart block (arrhythmia), hypothyroidism or in those who use certain drugs (for example, β-blockers). Diminished or absent pulses in the various arteries examined could be indicative of impaired blood flow caused by atherosclerosis. The evaluation of the penis in the flaccid condition might show the presence of Peyronie disease (involving palpable fibrous plaques), phimosis (congenital narrowing of the opening of the foreskin) or frenulum breve (whereby the tissue under the glans penis that connects to the foreskin is too short and restricts the movement of the foreskin), which can all contribute to erectile dysfunction. Measurement of blood pressure, waist circumference and body mass index is also performed105.
A few biochemical and hormonal parameters are of value in patients with erectile dysfunction. However, levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) are important determinants of cardiovascular and metabolic risk stratification105,106. Total testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin for the evaluation of calculated free testosterone105,106 are sufficient parameters to rule out hypogonadism. Prolactin and thyroid hormone evaluation are limited to a subset of patients105,106.
The vast majority of men with erectile dysfunction are managed within the primary care setting. However, in the presence of abnormal biochemical or hormonal values, further diagnostic tests are advisable (second-line evaluation). If the fasting plasma glucose level is 100–126 mg dl−1, or HbA1c is >5.7%, an oral glucose tolerance test can be used to exclude overt type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The necessity of performing further cardiovascular evaluation should be based on the criteria of the Princeton III Consensus Panel100 (TABLE 1). In the presence of reduced total testosterone and/or calculated free testosterone, obtaining prolactin and gonadotropin levels will determine the source (central or peripheral) of the problem.
Table 1.
Profile | Description | Sexual activity and PDE5 inhibitor use |
---|---|---|
Low |
|
|
Intermediate |
|
|
High |
|
Sexual activity delayed until cardiac condition stabilized |
Princeton III Consensus recommendations for risk stratification and cardiovascular evaluation for sexual activity100. PDE5, phosphodiesterase type 5.
Major cardiovascular risk factors include age, male gender, hypertension, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, smoking, dyslipidaemia, a sedentary lifestyle and a family history of premature cardiovascular disease.
Defined by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (see REF. 223).
Recent data have documented that penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (PDDU) can be performed in both flaccid (before vasodilator stimulation) and dynamic states (after vasodilator stimulation) to further improve the stratification of cardiovascular risk in men with erectile dysfunction103,107,108. Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity testing using the RigiScan device (GOTOP Medical, St Paul, Minnesota, USA) is currently rarely carried out109; its use is limited to testing the presence of nocturnal spontaneous erectile activity for medico-legal purposes when the presence of naturally occurring erections needs to be demonstrated. Arteriography and dynamic infusion cavernosometry (measuring cavernosal blood pressure) and cavernosography (to assess venous leak) are carried out only in young men who are potential candidates for vascular reconstructive surgery109.
Management
In the absence of a specific correctable aetiology, the management of erectile dysfunction is largely empirical and performed in a step-wise manner. That is, initial treatment is based on lifestyle modification followed by first-line therapies using PDE5 inhibitors and vacuum erection devices (VEDs). Second-line therapies consist of an intraurethral suppository (IUS) of prostaglandin E1 (alprostadil) and intracavernosal injection (ICI) with vasoactive substances. Surgical intervention is reserved as the final option after conservative options have been discussed or attempted.
Lifestyle modification
Lifestyle modifications can have a major role in managing erectile dysfunction, especially in the younger patient. The physician can identify reversible risk factors that contribute to the patient’s erectile dysfunction, such as medications, poor diet, low exercise, endocrinopathies and anxiety. Although epidemiological evidence seems to support a role for lifestyle factors in erectile dysfunction, limited data are available, suggesting that the treatment of underlying risk factors and coexisting illnesses will ultimately improve erectile dysfunction110. The major limitation remains the paucity of interventional studies assessing the effect of lifestyle changes on erectile function.
The available data support the recommendation that adults should do 30 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity most days of the week110. Weight loss in obese men, and switching from a Western diet to a Mediterranean diet, plus exercise, has been shown to improve erectile dysfunction outcomes111–113. It has also been shown that, in a group of patients with congestive heart failure, short-term moderate exercise training can improve sexual function114. A review of the patient’s medications might reveal some drugs that are well known to have erectile dysfunction as an adverse effect (BOX 2). However, much of the data on iatrogenic erectile dysfunction are based on observational studies, with severe limitations.
Smoking has been shown to have a direct relationship with erectile dysfunction, and a dose response relationship has been suggested because men have increased erectile difficulties with greater numbers of packets of cigarettes smoked or more years of smoking38,115,116. One study suggested that cessation of cigarette smoking can improve erectile function117. Mild alcohol consumption might improve erectile function by reducing anxiety; however, chronic use or alcohol abuse can have lasting effects on the liver, leading to low levels of testosterone and increased levels of oestrogen, both of which can contribute to erectile dysfunction118,119. Patients with psychological stressors (such as performance anxiety, relationship issues and current life stress)120 may benefit from confidence restoration with erectogenic medications and/or counselling with a psychologist or other health care professional specializing in sexual dysfunction121. Accordingly, the European Association of Urology states that “lifestyle changes and risk factor modification must precede or accompany any [erectile dysfunction] treatment”, and classifies the level of evidence for lifestyle modification as 1b with a grade A recommendation122.
Nonsurgical interventions
PDE5 inhibitors
Oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors (initially sildenafil, and later, vardenafil, tadalafil, avanafil, and others available outside of the United States (TABLE 2)) have changed the management of erectile dysfunction and created a sexual revolution123,124.
Table 2.
Drug name | Trade name (company) | Peak absorption post ingestion (hours) | Serum half-life (hours) | Take on empty stomach? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sildenafil* | Viagra (Pfizer) | 1–2 | 3–5 | Yes |
Vardenafil* | Levitra (GlaxoSmithKline) | 1–2 | 3–5 | Yes |
Tadalafil | Cialis (Lilly) | 2–4 | 18 | No |
Avanafil | Stendra (Mitsubishi Tanabe) | 0.5 | 6 | No |
Consider taking 1–2 hours prior to a meal.
Mechanistically, these drugs competitively inhibit PDE5, leading to a build-up of cGMP upon NO release, initiating a cascade of events that lead to smooth muscle relaxation and promotion of an erection29,125 (FIG. 4). Sildenafil and vardenafil reach their median Cmax (maximum observed plasma concentration) values 1 hour after administration and have a half-life of 3–5 hours126–128 (TABLE 2). The medications should be administered with adequate time before sexual intercourse to allow peak absorption of the drug. Patients must be instructed on optimal conditions for the medications to work effectively. Sildenafil and vardenafil should be taken on an empty stomach because lipids in foods can decrease and delay absorption126; tadalafil and avanafil are not as strongly affected by food127,128. Patients should be reminded that PDE5 inhibitors still require sexual stimulation, both physical and mental, to create arousal and initially raise the available levels of NO in an effort to generate cGMP production129.
PDE5 inhibitors have been beneficial in correcting erectile dysfunction in a wide range of patients with varying aetiologies of sexual dysfunction. Sildenafil has been shown to improve erections, leading to successful intercourse in 63% of men with general erectile dysfunction compared with 29% of men using a placebo130. A study in 2001 showed that 59% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were able to have successful intercourse while taking sildenafil compared with only 14% of those using a placebo131. In hypogonadal patients who have not responded to treatment with PDE5 inhibitors alone, recent studies have suggested that combination of testosterone supplementation and a PDE5 inhibitor can improve erectogenic outcomes132.
In men with prostate cancer who have undergone nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, erectile function declines while the cavernous nerves recover from the surgical trauma. Although data regarding the efficacy of penile rehabilitation in radical prostatectomy patients are mixed, the design of studies outside of the Pfizer-sponsored sildenafil study133 are fraught with significant methodological limitations. Thus, so far no study has defined the exact role of PDE5 inhibitors in penile rehabilitation in this patient population. Of note, one randomized placebo-controlled trial in men who have undergone radiotherapy for prostate cancer has demonstrated greater preservation of sexual function in those treated with PDE5 inhibitors versus a placebo134.
Patients should be counselled on the possible adverse events of these drugs, which may include headache, heartburn, facial flushing, nasal congestion and visual disturbances (owing to cross-reactivity with PDE6)124. Myalgia (muscle pain) is more common with tadalafil than the other PDE5 inhibitors. The use of a PDE5 inhibitor with nitrate-containing medications (for example, those used to treat angina) can result in a dangerously low blood pressure135. Also, PDE5 inhibitors and α-adrenergic receptor blockers, often used for treatment of BPH, need to be taken at least 4 hours apart. Priapism (prolonged erection of >4 hours) is a concern, but is a rare occurrence with PDE5 inhibitor therapy (approximately <0.1% of patients)136. Some vision-related conditions are cause for increased precautions, including macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa and nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Although no definitive data show causality in NAION, PDE5 inhibitors are contraindicated in patients with vision loss owing to NAION136 (the drugs exert mild inhibitory action against PDE6, which is present exclusively in rod and cone receptors). Concerns have also been raised regarding PDE5 inhibitor use and auditory changes (hearing loss and tinnitus); however, limited data support this link134. Patients who are concerned or who have hearing loss need to be warned about this risk, and may consider other options for erectile dysfunction treatment.
Vacuum erection devices
A VED is a cylindrical mechanical device placed over the penis and then pumped, which creates a negative pressure vacuum to draw blood into the penis137. The blood fills the lacunar spaces within the corpora cavernosa, causing tumescence. Devices are often used in conjunction with a constriction band that is placed at the base of the penis after tumescence is achieved, to prevent the backflow of blood. A study in 1991showed that 75% of diabetic men were able to have sexual intercourse when using a VED to achieve tumescence138. However, discontinuation rates of up to 30% were also reported owing to bruising on the penis, pivoting at the base of the penis, coldness and/or numbness of the penis, pain related to the constriction band and/or decreased ability to achieve orgasm139. Patients benefit from a training session to help optimize their understanding of proper use of VED. Obtaining a tight seal of the cylinder against the body using lubricant and/or trimming the pubic hair is important for success with the VED. Men with large pubic fat pads and/or a buried penis may have difficulty placing the device because they have a less usable penile shaft140.
Several adverse reactions have been noted with VEDs use that should be pointed out to patients. These adverse effects include petechiae (capillary bleeding) and haematoma (a swelling of clotted blood)141. Patients need to be warned that constriction band use to maintain tumescence can give a grey-blue colour to the penis, and that the penis can become cool to the touch, owing to obstructed venous outflow. Few data exist on the use of VEDs for rehabilitation after prostatectomy; however, one randomized prospective study showed that daily VED use can preserve penile length after radical prostatectomy142.
Intraurethral suppository
The use of IUS involves the placement of a prostaglandin E1-loaded pellet within the urethra before sexual intercourse. After insertion of the pellet, the patient should massage that area of the penis to help disperse the medication. The drug is absorbed through the urethra into the corpora cavernosa and increases the intracellular levels of cyclic AMP (cAMP), leading to decreased intracellular Ca2+ levels, increased smooth muscle relaxation and tumescence143.
As a second-line treatment to PDE5 inhibitors, one study showed IUS efficacy in 56% of patients; those with organic erectile dysfunction were more likely to respond144. Another study showed that, across all patients, 65% of men were able to have sexual intercourse, including patients with diabetes144, but a second study found that only 46% of patients with diabetes could have intercourse145.
After radical prostatectomy, one study showed that IUS use for penile rehabilitation was not significantly different to sildenafil. However, the IUS group had a significant dropout rate and lower compliance rate compared with the sildenafil group146.
Patients need to be trained on the technique of the IUS before use and should be advised that pain or burning may occur with use of this medication. The painful sensation can be intolerable for some patients: one study showed that 39% of patients discontinued use owing to pain147.
Priapism is a risk in patients using IUS, but the actual rate of occurrence is low. Other adverse effects include penile pain, urethral pain and dizziness148. Patients need to be cautioned before using IUS if they have any diseases of the urethra, such as urethral stricture. Furthermore, there can also be transference of prostaglandin E1 to the partner, and condoms should be used if the partner is pregnant to avoid premature labour.
Intracavernosal injection
ICI involves the use of vasoactive substances injected directly into the corpora cavernosa via a small needle. These vasoactive agents include prostaglandin E1, papaverine and phentolamine (and sometimes atropine), which work alone or in combination to elicit an erection. Prostaglandin E1 has been approved by the FDA as a single-agent ICI for erectile dysfunction and increases cAMP levels. Papaverine is a nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor that leads to increased levels of cAMP and cGMP. Phentolamine is an α1-adrenergic receptor inhibitor that helps to prevent vasoconstriction to maintain tumescence149.
These vasoactive drugs are available in varying strengths and combinations made by pharmacies: monotherapy with prostaglandin E1; bi-mixture of papaverine and phentolamine; and tri-mixture of prostaglandin E1, papaverine and phentolamine. Patients require training on how to prepare the medications with syringes for home use; an in-office test dose can be useful to characterize the patient’s response. The dose can then be titrated up or down under supervision to one that is satisfactory to the patient. Many patients have an understandable fear of injecting the penis, and overcoming this is the first step to successful treatment150.
Initial satisfaction rates are high, with up to 94% of patients achieving a satisfactory erection with in-office titration151. However, dropout rates with ICI are also high, with 46–80% abandoning treatment in the first year152,153. Reasons for dropouts included lack of partner, high cost, problems with the concept of penile injection and a desire for a permanent solution154.
A major concern with ICI use is priapism. If priapism occurs, the patient will need to seek urgent medical attention, which might require aspiration of blood, surgical shunt formation or ICI of phenylephrine to cause cavernosal vasoconstriction155. Pain has also been frequently described in up to 50% of patients and is usually attributed to prostaglandin E1, but often attenuates over time. Bruising can also be observed, as might be expected with any injected medication.
Injections are useful for patients after radical prostatectomy, if they fail to respond to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Penile injections have been used frequently in the penile rehabilitation setting based on survey data156, but its acceptance is not widespread.
Surgical interventions
Penile implants
Although oral and vacuum erection therapies are effective first-line and second-line management options for most men with erectile dysfunction, surgical interventions remain an important modality in certain situations. Indeed, surgery might be suited for patients who have contraindications, experience adverse effects or are refractory to medical therapy; patients with erectile dysfunction and penile fibrosis secondary to Peyronie disease, prolonged priapism or severe infections; and patients with structural and/or vascular penile defects from genital or pelvic trauma. The current surgical armamentarium includes insertion of a penile prosthesis and vascular reconstructive surgery.
Penile implants include malleable and inflatable devices157 (FIG. 8). Malleable prostheses consist of semi rigid cylinders that can be bent upwards for sexual intercourse and downwards to conceal when not in use. These devices are easy to handle, have low mechanical failure rates and are optimal for patients who have diminished manual dexterity. Unfortunately, owing to their constant rigidity, they can be uncomfortable, can cause social embarrassment and are at a higher risk of erosion158. Two-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs) consist of two cylinders with a scrotal pump, which enables transfer of fluid to the cylinder chambers when an erection is desired. Although it provides similar rigidity to a malleable device, it also enables better flaccidity when deflated159. Its main indication is in patients in whom placement of an abdominal fluid reservoir is contraindicated or not feasible. For all remaining patients, implantation of a three-piece IPP is considered the gold standard in North America. This system consists of paired corporal cylinders, a scrotal pump and an abdominal reservoir filled with saline. This device provides the greatest degree of girth expansion and penile rigidity (owing to its larger fluid reservoir) when an erection is desired, and the most flaccidity when deflated157. Prosthesis implantation can be performed using infrapubic, penoscrotal or subcoronal approaches.
One subset of patients who benefit from implantation of an IPP is men with Peyronie disease and concomitant erectile dysfunction. Although penile plication or incision and grafting procedures are options to correct the penile curvature in men with good erections, insertion of a prosthesis is the recommended approach for those with poor erections, often due to vascular insufficiency160. For these men, owing to higher patient and partner satisfaction rates, a three-piece IPP is preferred over a malleable device161. IPP placement alone can often correct the penile deformity, but it is sometimes necessary to use adjunctive straightening manoeuvres — such as penile modelling (manual straightening), plication, incision of plaque and grafting — to optimize results162.
Corporal fibrosis is another circumstance in which penile prosthesis implantation is indicated. Such fibrosis usually occurs secondary to priapism, previous prosthesis infection or trauma. Surgical techniques include excision or incision of the scar, corporal excavation, corporotomies with or without grafting, use of cavernotomes (to scrape the fibrotic areas), implant downsizing and transcorporal resection163.
Contemporary data using newer devices (for example, devices made with sturdier materials or antibiotic-coated devices) demonstrate improved results with rates of overall freedom from reoperation and mechanical failure at 10 years of 74.9% and 81.3%, respectively164. Reported complications following IPP implantation include infection, distal cylinder erosion, auto-inflation, pump migration and reservoir displacement165. Overall, IPP placement is associated with excellent patient (92–100%) and partner (91–95%) satisfaction rates, significantly higher than satisfaction rates reported for oral, intraurethral and intracavernosal medical therapies166,167. However, because of its associated high cost, potential complications and invasiveness of the procedure, IPP implantation should only be offered to patients who fail more conservative measures (such as those described above).
Penile revascularization
Building on the same principles as bypass surgery for coronary artery disease, penile revascularization surgery techniques were developed to anastomose the inferior epigastric artery to either the dorsal artery or deep dorsal vein (arterialization), with or without venous ligation165, to improve penile vascular inflow while reducing venous outflow. However, multicentre studies have revealed that arteriogenic erectile dysfunction is not common, and is more often associated with systemic multifactorial disease, possibly caused by a combination of endothelial and corporal smooth muscle dysfunction, leading to a drop in penile revascularization procedures performed clinically165. A review of the published literature shows that the overall sexual satisfaction rate following penile revascularization (12%) is lower than that following placement of an IPP (93%)165. Currently, penile revascularization is recommended for younger men (<55 years) who are not diabetic, non-smokers and have a documented isolated stenotic segment of the internal pudendal artery without concomitant venous leak. The success rates are reported to be as high as 80% in some populations168,169. Potential complications of penile revascularization include glans hyperaemia, shunt thrombosis and inguinal hernias170.
Currently, no standardized method is available to accurately and systematically diagnose corporal veno-occlusive dysfunction independently of general arterial insufficiency171. Most medical experts and organizations think that venous leak is a consequence rather than an isolated aetiology of erectile dysfunction. As such, both the American Urological Association and the International Society for Sexual Medicine concur that “surgeries performed with the intent to limit the venous outflow of the penis are not recommended” (REFS 171,172).
Quality of life
Impact on the patient
Erectile dysfunction can have a substantial negative effect on a man’s quality of life (BOX 3). Many men with erectile dysfunction experience depressive symptoms and anxiety related to sexual performance and avoid engaging in sexual relations. Many men also avoid seeking treatment for their sexual dysfunction173–176. The association between the condition and depression is considered to be bidirectional, with the two conditions reinforcing each other in a downward spiral173. Importantly, men with depression and erectile dysfunction have lower libidos than men with erectile dysfunction alone, and are less likely to discuss their erectile dysfunction with their partners175,177.
Box 3. Impact of erectile dysfunction on the patient, partner and couple.
Intimate relationships and health have a dynamic nature over time
Involvement of both partners’ health in joint overall ‘health’ means that the illnesses of one partner affect the health of the other
Rates of depression in men with erectile dysfunction are reported to be as high as 56%
Anxiety in a sexual situation is prevalent and can trigger a loss in sexual confidence
As a result of this psychological burden, many men with erectile dysfunction avoid sexual situations and use erectogenic medications
Erectile dysfunction negatively affects a man’s quality of life and satisfaction in his relationship
Erectile dysfunction is associated with female partner sexual dysfunction
Female sexual function improves with treatment of erectile dysfunction in her partner with phosophodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and nerve-sparing surgery (in men with prostate cancer)
The proportion of men with erectile dysfunction has been reported to be as high as 50%, and data from many well designed population-based studies have demonstrated a significant relationship between erectile dysfunction and depressive symptoms (OR 1.7, P < 0.05)174,175. These studies were conducted in men aged 40–70 years in the United States, Finland, Brazil, Japan and Malaysia.
Anxiety is also a concern, and it can lead to the inability to maintain an erection (psychogenic erectile dysfunction)178. This anxiety increases a man’s focus on the firmness of his erection, leading to self-consciousness and cognitive distractions that interfere with arousal and contribute to poor performance179,180. Men who cannot achieve or maintain an erection as a result of anxiety lose sexual confidence and generally develop greater fears leading up to the next sexual encounter, which increases the likelihood of failure and reinforces the pressure to perform during future encounters178.
Given the psychological consequences of erectile dysfunction, it is not surprising that many men have difficulty accepting their condition and avoid treatment. Research indicates that as many as 69% of men deny the existence of their erectile dysfunction, and the median time to pursue treatment for erectile dysfunction is >2 years181. Men report that they experience significant disappointment and shame related to erectile dysfunction; and even when using erectile dysfunction treatments, men report a fear of failure and a tendency to avoid sexual situations as a result of this fear182. In fact, data indicate that 50–80% of men discontinue use of medical interventions (oral medications, ICIs or VEDs) for erectile dysfunction within 1 year183,184, and dropout rates related to PDE5 inhibitor use are estimated to be 30–50%185–187. Although men discontinue erectile dysfunction treatment for a number of reasons, avoidance of sexual activity might be a primary cause182. This avoidance leads to continued distress, anxiety and potential relationship difficulties.
Considering the potential psychological effect of erectile dysfunction, appropriate psychological evaluation, in addition to appropriate medical treatment, is important. This biopsychosocial perspective implies that physical treatments, as well as psychological interventions, are needed to ensure that men pursue and continue to use appropriate erectile dysfunction treatments.
Impact on the partner
Health and sexuality have a bidirectional relationship, and both partners of a couple contribute assets and/or liabilities to the health endowment. In this context, health is defined as jointly produced by a man and his intimate partner188. Joint production of health means that the illnesses of one partner affect the health of the other; in addition, there is a dynamic aspect in both intimate relationships and health over time. For example, if a man has erectile dysfunction, his partner might report decreased libido because he or she is anticipating a negative sexual experience rather than a positive one. Similarly, an endometrial cancer survivor with stenosis and dyspareunia can have a partner who experiences sexual aversion because he or she fears intimacy will cause her pain189. Likewise, if a man has premature ejaculation, his partner may be unable to experience orgasm, which causes distress about sexual satisfaction190. However, this distress may be reversed when the partner’s sexual dysfunction is treated.
The Female Experience of Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (FEMALES) study characterized the sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction through surveys performed before and after the development of their partner’s erectile dysfunction and in relation to his use of PDE5 inhibitors191. The study showed that after men develop erectile dysfunction, their partners engage in significantly less sexual activity than before (P < 0.001). Women with partners taking PDE5 inhibitors reported that they experienced more frequent sexual desire, arousal and orgasm (P < 0.05) than women with partners not receiving treatment. A study carried out in Taiwan evaluated the association of erectile dysfunction with female sexual function and corroborated the results from the FEMALES study192. It demonstrated that female partners of men with erectile dysfunction had significantly (P < 0.001) lower overall and individual domain scores on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) than women whose partners did not have erectile dysfunction. After adjusting for other risk factors, the women’s sexual function was worse in terms of arousal, orgasm, sexual satisfaction and sexual pain.
Impact on the couple
Sexual dysfunction is not only an issue for the individual but also for the couple. In one trial, on-demand oral vardenafil improved erectile function as measured by males’ responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile question 3 (P < 0.0001), and the sexual quality of life of the couple as measured by the female partners’ responses to the quality of life domain of the modified Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire at last observation carried forward (P < 0.0001)193. Another vardenafil treatment study showed similar efficacy for erectile dysfunction and also improved the sexual satisfaction of the female partners who had not themselves received specific interventions for sexual function194. The female partners’ total FSFI score and scores for sexual desire, subjective arousal, lubrication, orgasm and satisfaction increased. This study also showed that the female partner’s sexual function improvements significantly related to treatment responses in her partner.
A study assessing the impact of prostate cancer treatment on couples’ sexual function during the initiation phase of treatment found that the couples’ ‘complicity’ remained intact despite decline in the male’s sexual function195. Global marital adjustment was measured by the marital adjustment test (MAT), a self-reported 15-item questionnaire that successfully differentiates between distressed and non-distressed couples; couples’ MAT scores were unchanged before and after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. However, postoperative decreases in IIEF scores and the female partners’ FSFI scores were significantly associated within couples. Interestingly, when strategies were used to prevent or limit erectile dysfunction, sexual function of women improved; bilateral nerve-sparing surgery preserved not only male but also female sexual function195.
These various interventions demonstrate the interrelationship of partners’ sexuality and the concept of a sexual unit in long-term relationships. Thus, couple sexuality is a dynamic process, which adapts and responds to the sexual states of each partner and can be enhanced by interventions directed at improving one partner’s sexual functioning.
Outlook
Although the clinical management of erectile dysfunction has been rather static since the advent of PDE5 inhibitors, basic and translational research has continued to progress and deliver new therapeutic targets that are in various stages of development. A crude division can be made between pharmacotherapeutic compounds196 on the one hand, and regenerative medicine197 on the other (FIG. 9).
Pharmacotherapeutics
A considerable proportion of men do not respond to oral PDE5 inhibitors and have to resort to ICI therapy or penile prosthesis implantation to be able to have intercourse198. Refractoriness to PDE5 inhibitors stems from the need for endogenous NO release from the NANC fibres and for the endothelium to be able to accumulate cGMP to cause smooth muscle relaxation during sexual stimulation196. Thus, there is a clear medical need for compounds (preferentially orally administered ones) that cause smooth muscle relaxation in the absence of NO. Although both centrally and peripherally acting compounds are being preclinically investigated, ROCK inhibitors and soluble guanylyl cyclase activators are of particular interest because they can be beneficial to patients who do not respond to PDE5 inhibitors. Detailed reviews of the pharmacotherapeutic pipeline in erectile dysfunction are available elsewhere196–199.
ROCK inhibitors
The ROCK pathway plays an important part in maintaining the flaccid state of the penis (FIG. 3a). ROCK phosphorylates and inactivates myosin light chain phosphatase, allowing the myosin light chain to stay phosphorylated and, therefore, bound to smooth muscle actin200. That is, inhibition of ROCK provides a mechanism of smooth muscle relaxation that is independent of NO. In various animal models of erectile dysfunction (diabetes, ageing and cavernous nerve injury), ROCK was found to be upregulated, which makes it an attractive target for the future treatment of erectile dysfunction201–203. In animal studies, acute administration of the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 was shown to induce relaxation of rat corpus cavernosum strips in vitro and to cause an increase in intracavernous pressure in rat models of erectile dysfunction. The inhibition of ROCK elicited an erectile response by a process that was not mediated by NO or cGMP, and resulted in better erectile responses than in sham-treated animals201–203. Recently, it was shown that ROCK2 is upregulated in the corpora cavernosa of men with erectile dysfunction, corroborating earlier results in animal studies204. This indicates that ROCK2 may be an important target, especially as targeting an upregulated isoform of ROCK specifically addresses the altered physiology in the diseased smooth muscle. Furthermore, animal studies have shown that chronic ROCK inhibition can lead to sustained improvement of erectile function201–203.
Although Y-27632 is still in a preclinical phase, SAR-407899 (another ROCK inhibitor under development) has advanced to clinical trial. However, although a randomized double-blind Phase II trial in 20 patients with erectile dysfunction (NCT00914277)196 was conducted, the results, for unknown reasons, were never made public. Other ROCK inhibitors, such as cethrin, are currently under clinical investigation for related conditions such as spinal cord injury, and successful outcomes of these studies might bring promise for erectile dysfunction following cavernous nerve injury.
Soluble guanylyl cyclase activators
Another class of molecules under consideration is the activators of soluble guanylyl cyclase. In the healthy state, this enzyme is activated by NO to generate cGMP from GTP196. However, when endogenous NO production is limited, direct activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase can result in smooth muscle relaxation. Activators of soluble guanylyl cyclase have been shown to induce smooth muscle relaxation in vitro and penile erection in vivo in animal models. One activator, BAY60-4552, was investigated in a rat model of erectile dysfunction following cavernous nerve injury in combination with vardenafil; the combination therapy resulted in improved erectile function compared with non-injured sham-treated animals205. A subsequent clinical study showed that BAY60-4552 and vardenafil had synergistic effects on smooth muscle relaxation in corpus cavernosum strips from patients who did not respond to PDE5 inhibitors206.
The safety of BAY60-4552 has been tested in a Phase I trial (NCT01110590). When given in combination with vardenafil, no major adverse effects were reported in men with erectile dysfunction according to company data207. However, a Phase II study (NCT01168817)208 study failed to demonstrate superior efficacy of the combination treatment of BAY60-4552 plus vardenafil versus vardenafil alone, although both active treatments showed superior efficacy versus a placebo. The drug is apparently not being investigated further for erectile dysfunction because it was not shown to be superior to vardenafil monotherapy. Aspects of the study design merit further examination of this compound as a treatment for erectile dysfunction by either pharmaceutical companies or academia. Further research is also warranted in the specific population of patients who do not respond to PDE5 inhibitors.
Regenerative medicine
Currently, the treatment of erectile dysfunction focuses on symptomatic relief and, therefore, tends to provide a temporary reprieve rather than providing a cure or reversing the cause. As stated above, the existence of a large population of difficult-to-treat patients has motivated researchers to identify new treatment approaches that focus on cure and restoration of the underlying cause, rather than providing ad hoc symptomatic treatment. Regenerative medicine has developed extensively over the past few decades, and preclinical trials have emphasized the benefit of growth factor therapy, gene transfer, stem cells and tissue engineering for the estoration of erectile function197.
One approach investigating the gene transfer-assisted upregulation of the endogenously present ‘Maxi-K’ potassium channel into penile smooth muscle cells to increase their relaxant capacities has been examined in a Phase I clinical trial. The treatment seems safe and preliminary indicators of effectiveness were present in a small number of treated patients209. Furthermore, a plethora of studies have investigated the preclinical administration of stem cells in animal models of erectile dysfunction related to ageing, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, cavernous nerve injury, Peyronie disease and even penile trauma210. Researchers have generally reached a consensus that the results of these studies, mainly using mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow and adipose tissue, show this to be a promising approach211.
Recently, human umbilical cord blood stem cells have shown beneficial effects on erectile function when administered into the penises of men with severe type 2 diabetes212. However, this effect was short-lived and not durable. Another Phase I trial investigated intracavernous administration of bone marrow cells after radical prostatectomy in an open dose-escalation study and reported no serious adverse effects213. Conclusions on efficacy in these trials should be drawn with necessary caution, as these trials were designed to study safety (no control group); however, preliminary efficacy data are promising, with improved erectile function and penile vascularization measurements in a small set of patients. Although these initial safety data are encouraging, larger Phase I–III studies and functional results are eagerly awaited. To date, at least seven stem cells trials have been registered214–220.
Acknowledgments
M.A. has received grants from Ferring, Bayer, ESSM and ISSM, and served as an advisor for Sandoz, Sobi and Sanofi. G.C. has received consultancy fees from Bayer, Besins, Otsuka, Eli-Lilly and Menarini. A.M.I. has served as an advisor for Otsuka, Shire, Besins, Novartis and Menarini. M.M. has served as an advisor and/or received speaker’s fees from Bayer, Ely Lilly, Menarini, Prostrakan and Intercept. C.J.N. has served as an unpaid advisor for American Medical Systems. S.P. has served as an advisor for Pfizer, Sprout Pharmaceuticals, Emotional Brain and Strategic Science Technologies, and received speaker’s fees from Pfizer. R.T. has served as an advisor for Lilly and Orient Europharma, and received speaker’s fees from Lilly. J.P.M. has received grants from CIACT, NIH and SMSNA, and served as an advisor for Lilly, Pfizer and AMS. W.J.G.H. has served as an advisor for Abbvie, American Medical Systems, Coloplast and Pfizer.
Footnotes
Author contributions
Introduction (R.T.); Epidemiology (A.S.); Mechanisms/pathophysiology (L.J., J.M., A.M.I.); Diagnosis, screening and prevention (G.C., M.M.); Management (L.J., J.M., F.A.Y., W.J.G.H.); Quality of life (C.N., S.G., S.P.); Outlook (M.A.); overview of Primer (L.J., J.M., F.A.Y., W.J.G.H.).
Competing interests
The other authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Virag R, Zwang G, Dermange H, Legman M. Vasculogenic impotence: a review of 92 cases with 54 surgical operations. Vasc Surg. 1981;15:9–17. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Glina S, Shindel A, Eardley I, Ghanem H. Cavernosal α-blockade: a new technique for investigating and treating erectile impotence by GS Brindley. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1791–1794. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00954.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–82. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blumenthal SA. Earl Sutherland (1915–1974) [corrected] and the discovery of cyclic AMP. Perspect Biol Med. 2012;55:236–249. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2012.0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ballard SA, et al. Effects of sildenafil on the relaxation of human corpus cavernosum tissue in vitro and on the activities of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isozymes. J Urol. 1998;159:2164–2171. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63299-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gandaglia G, et al. A systematic review of the association between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Eur Urol. 2014;65:968–978. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151:54–61. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)34871-1. This seminal manuscript defines the prevalence of erectile dysfunction. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Corona G, et al. Age-related changes in general and sexual health in middle-aged and older men: results from the European Male Ageing Study (EMAS) J Sex Med. 2010;7:1362–1380. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rosen R, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7) Eur Urol. 2003;44:637–649. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.08.015. This publication describes the relationship of LUTS and erectile dysfunction. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nicolosi A, et al. Sexual behavior and sexual dysfunctions after age 40: the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Urology. 2004;64:991–997. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Laumann EO, et al. Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:39–57. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901250. An international study evaluating different aspect of sexual difficulties and some associated predictors. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shabsigh R, Perelman MA, Lockhart DC, Lue TF, Broderick GA. Health issues of men: prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2005;174:662–667. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000165389.73148.d1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Johannes CB, et al. Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 2000;163:460–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moreira ED, et al. Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: results from a population-based cohort study in Brazil. Urology. 2003;61:431–436. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02158-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schouten BW, et al. Incidence rates of erectile dysfunction in the Dutch general population. Effects of definition, clinical relevance and duration of follow-up in the Krimpen study. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:58–62. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seftel AD, et al. Coexisting lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of epidemiological data. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:32–45. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gacci M, et al. Critical analysis of the relationship between sexual dysfunctions and lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol. 2011;60:809–825. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Corona G, Rastrelli G, Maseroli E, Forti G, Maggi M. Sexual function of the ageing male. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27:581–601. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jannini EA, et al. Health-related characteristics and unmet needs of men with erectile dysfunction: a survey in five European countries. J Sex Med. 2014;11:40–50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ludwig W, Phillips M. Organic causes of erectile dysfunction in men under 40. Urol Int. 2014;92:1–6. doi: 10.1159/000354931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Capogrosso P, et al. One patient out of four with newly diagnosed erectile dysfunction is a young man — worrisome picture from the everyday clinical practice. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1833–1841. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Heruti R, Shochat T, Tekes-Manova D, Ashkenazi I, Justo D. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction among young adults: results of a large-scale survey. J Sex Med. 2004;1:284–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.04041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanders SA, et al. General erectile functioning among young, heterosexual men who do and do not report condom-associated erection problems (CAEP) J Sex Med. 2015;12:1897–1904. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Papagiannopoulos D, Khare N, Nehra A. Evaluation of young men with organic erectile dysfunction. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:11–16. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.139253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yao F, et al. Erectile dysfunction may be the first clinical sign of insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in young men. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102:645–651. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0577-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Salonia A, et al. Is erectile dysfunction a reliable proxy of general male health status? The case for the International Index of Erectile Function–Erectile Function domain. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2708–2715. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Andersson KE, Wagner G. Physiology of penile erection. Physiol Rev. 1995;75:191–236. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1995.75.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saenz de Tejada I, Kim N, Lagan I, Krane RJ, Goldstein I. Regulation of adrenergic activity in penile corpus cavernosum. J Urol. 1989;142:1117–1121. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39009-2. A seminal paper on cell signalling in the corpora cavernosum. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lue TF. Erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1802–1813. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006153422407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lue TF, Tanagho EA. Physiology of erection and pharmacological management of impotence. J Urol. 1987;137:829–836. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44267-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McCabe MP, Althof SE. A systematic review of the psychosocial outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction: does the impact of erectile dysfunction extend beyond a man’s inability to have sex? J Sex Med. 2014;11:347–363. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brackett NL, Lynne CM, Ibrahim E, Ohl DA, Sonksen J. Treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:162–172. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Leungwattanakij S, et al. Cavernous neurotomy causes hypoxia and fibrosis in rat corpus cavernosum. J Androl. 2003;24:239–245. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ferrini MG, et al. Vardenafil prevents fibrosis and loss of corporal smooth muscle that occurs after bilateral cavernosal nerve resection in the rat. Urology. 2006;68:429–435. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ferrini MG, Kovanecz I, Nolazco G, Rajfer J, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF. Effects of long-term vardenafil treatment on the development of fibrotic plaques in a rat model of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2006;97:625–633. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ferrini MG, et al. Fibrosis and loss of smooth muscle in the corpora cavernosa precede corporal veno-occlusive dysfunction (CVOD) induced by experimental cavernosal nerve damage in the rat. J Sex Med. 2009;6:415–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01105.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mulhall JP, et al. The functional and structural consequences of cavernous nerve injury are ameliorated by sildenafil citrate. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1126–1136. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00794.x. This manuscript describes the science behind the use of sildenafil to decrease erectile tissue damage after cavernous nerve injury. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kupelian V, Araujo AB, Chiu GR, Rosen RC, McKinlay JB. Relative contributions of modifiable risk factors to erectile dysfunction: results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Prev Med. 2010;50:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bacon CG, et al. A prospective study of risk factors for erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2006;176:217–221. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00589-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Francis ME, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM, Eggers PW. The contribution of common medical conditions and drug exposures to erectile dysfunction in adult males. J Urol. 2007;178:591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wei M, et al. Total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as important predictors of erectile dysfunction. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:930–937. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McVary KT, Carrier S, Wessells H, Subcommittee on Smoking and Erectile Dysfunction Socioeconomic Committee, Sexual Medicine Society of North America Smoking and erectile dysfunction: evidence based analysis. J Urol. 2001;166:1624–1632. This publication examines the negative effects of smoking on erectile dysfunction. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moreland RB, et al. PGE1 suppresses the induction of collagen synthesis by transforming growth factor-β 1 in human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle. J Urol. 1995;153:826–834. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Moreland RB. Is there a role of hypoxemia in penile fibrosis: a viewpoint presented to the Society for the Study of Impotence. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10:113–120. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nehra A, et al. Mechanisms of venous leakage: a prospective clinicopathological correlation of corporeal function and structure. J Urol. 1996;156:1320–1329. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65578-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tal R, et al. Persistent erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: the association between nerve-sparing status and the prevalence and chronology of venous leak. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2813–2819. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Grimm RH, Jr, et al. Long-term effects on sexual function of five antihypertensive drugs and nutritional hygienic treatment in hypertensive men and women Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) Hypertension. 1997;29:8–14. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.29.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baskin LS, et al. The effect of testosterone on androgen receptors and human penile growth. J Urol. 1997;158:1113–1118. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199709000-00108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Boas M, et al. Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:125–129. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Filippi S, et al. Testosterone partially ameliorates metabolic profile and erectile responsiveness to PDE5 inhibitors in an animal model of male metabolic syndrome. J Sex Med. 2009;6:3274–3288. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vignozzi L, et al. Testosterone regulates RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling in two distinct animal models of chemical diabetes. J Sex Med. 2007;4:620–630. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00440.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hull EM, et al. Hormone–neurotransmitter interactions in the control of sexual behavior. Behav Brain Res. 1999;105:105–116. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00086-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Isidori AM, et al. A critical analysis of the role of testosterone in erectile function: from pathophysiology to treatment — a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014;65:99–112. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mills TM, Lewis RW, Stopper VS. Androgenic maintenance of inflow and veno-occlusion during erection in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1998;59:1413–1418. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod59.6.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lugg J, Ng C, Rajfer J, Gonzalez-Cadavid N. Cavernosal nerve stimulation in the rat reverses castration-induced decrease in penile NOS activity. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:E354–E361. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.2.E354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Giuliano F, Rampin O, Schirar A, Jardin A, Rousseau JP. Autonomic control of penile erection: modulation by testosterone in the rat. J Neuroendocrinol. 1993;5:677–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1993.tb00539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Traish AM, et al. Effects of castration and androgen replacement on erectile function in a rabbit model. Endocrinology. 1999;140:1861–1868. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.4.6655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Reilly CM, Lewis RW, Stopper VS, Mills TM. Androgenic maintenance of the rat erectile response via a non-nitric-oxide-dependent pathway. J Androl. 1997;18:588–594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sopko NA, Hannan JL, Bivalacqua TJ. Understanding and targeting the Rho kinase pathway in erectile dysfunction. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:622–628. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liao W, Huang W, Guo Y, Xin M, Fu X. Testosterone promotes vascular endothelial cell migration via upregulation of ROCK-2/moesin cascade. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:6729–6735. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2788-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang XH, Melman A, Disanto ME. Update on corpus cavernosum smooth muscle contractile pathways in erectile function: a role for testosterone? J Sex Med. 2011;8:1865–1879. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02218.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.di Villa BR, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate induces endothelial nitric-oxide synthase activation through phosphorylation in human corpus cavernosum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;316:703–708. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.093419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ohmori T, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate induces contraction of coronary artery smooth muscle cells via S1P2. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;58:170–177. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00260-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Morelli A, et al. Androgens regulate phosphodiesterase type 5 expression and functional activity in corpora cavernosa. Endocrinology. 2004;145:2253–2263. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhang XH, et al. Testosterone regulates PDE5 expression and in vivo responsiveness to tadalafil in rat corpus cavernosum. Eur Urol. 2005;47:409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.10.021. This manuscript describes the animal model showing the effect of testosterone on cavernosal tissue. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yang R, et al. Lack of direct androgen regulation of PDE5 expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;380:758–762. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Traish AM, Toselli P, Jeong SJ, Kim NN. Adipocyte accumulation in penile corpus cavernosum of the orchiectomized rabbit: a potential mechanism for veno-occlusive dysfunction in androgen deficiency. J Androl. 2005;26:242–248. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2005.tb01091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Andric SA, Janjic MM, Stojkov NJ, Kostic TS. Testosterone-induced modulation of nitric oxide–cGMP signaling pathway and androgenesis in the rat Leydig cells. Biol Reprod. 2010;83:434–442. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.083626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Reilly CM, Stopper VS, Mills TM. Androgens modulate the α-adrenergic responsiveness of vascular smooth muscle in the corpus cavernosum. J Androl. 1997;18:26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bancroft J, Wu FC. Changes in erectile responsiveness during androgen replacement therapy. Arch Sex Behav. 1983;12:59–66. doi: 10.1007/BF01542116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gray PB, et al. Dose-dependent effects of testosterone on sexual function, mood, and visuospatial cognition in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:3838–3846. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Buena F, et al. Sexual function does not change when serum testosterone levels are pharmacologically varied within the normal male range. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1118–1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kwan M, Greenleaf WJ, Mann J, Crapo L, Davidson JM. The nature of androgen action on male sexuality: a combined laboratory-self-report study on hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57:557–562. doi: 10.1210/jcem-57-3-557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Giannetta E, Gianfrilli D, Barbagallo F, Isidori AM, Lenzi A. Subclinical male hypogonadism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26:539–550. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tajar A, et al. Characteristics of secondary, primary, and compensated hypogonadism in aging men: evidence from the European Male Ageing study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1810–1818. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Corona G, et al. Testosterone supplementation and sexual function: a meta-analysis study. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1577–1592. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12536. Meta-analysis that examines the relationship between testosterone therapy and sexual function. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Saad F, et al. Onset of effects of testosterone treatment and time span until maximum effects are achieved. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165:675–685. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Giltay EJ, et al. Effects of testosterone supplementation on depressive symptoms and sexual dysfunction in hypogonadal men with the metabolic syndrome. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2572–2582. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hackett G, et al. Testosterone replacement therapy with long-acting testosterone undecanoate improves sexual function and quality-of-life parameters versus placebo in a population of men with type 2 diabetes. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1612–1627. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Isidori AM, et al. Outcomes of androgen replacement therapy in adult male hypogonadism: recommendations from the Italian society of endocrinology. J Endocrinol Invest. 2014;38:103–112. doi: 10.1007/s40618-014-0155-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Basaria S, et al. Effects of testosterone administration for 3 years on subclinical atherosclerosis progression in older men with low or low-normal testosterone levels: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:570–581. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Morgentaler A. Testosterone, cardiovascular risk, and hormonophobia. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1362–1366. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Finkle WD, et al. Increased risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction following testosterone therapy prescription in men. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Sharma R, et al. Normalization of testosterone level is associated with reduced incidence of myocardial infarction and mortality in men. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2706–2715. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sansone A, Romanelli F, Gianfrilli D, Lenzi A. Endocrine evaluation of erectile dysfunction. Endocrine. 2014;46:423–430. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0254-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Corona G, et al. Psychobiological correlates of smoking in patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:527–534. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Cao S, Gan Y, Dong X, Liu J, Lu Z. Association of quantity and duration of smoking with erectile dysfunction: a dose–response meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2004;11:2376–2384. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Boddi V, et al. Priapus is happier with Venus than with Bacchus. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2831–2841. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01887.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wang F, Dai S, Wang M, Morrison H. Erectile dysfunction and fruit/vegetable consumption among diabetic Canadian men. Urology. 2013;82:1330–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Cheng JY, Ng EM, Ko JS, Chen RY. Physical activity and erectile dysfunction: meta-analysis of population-based studies. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19:245–252. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Corona G, et al. Erectile dysfunction and central obesity: an Italian perspective. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:581–591. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.126386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Vignozzi L, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis as a novel player in metabolic syndrome-induced erectile dysfunction: an experimental study in the rabbit. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;384:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Corona G, et al. The SUBITO-DE study: sexual dysfunction in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes male patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 2013;36:864–868. doi: 10.3275/8969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Corona G, et al. Sexual dysfunction at the onset of type 2 diabetes: the interplay of depression, hormonal and cardiovascular factors. J Sex Med. 2014;11:2065–2073. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Corona G, et al. Hormonal association and sexual dysfunction in patients with impaired fasting glucose: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1669–1680. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Guo W, et al. Erectile dysfunction and risk of clinical cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of seven cohort studies. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2805–2816. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Dong JY, Zhang YH, Qin LQ. Erectile dysfunction and risk of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1378–1385. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Vlachopoulos CV, Terentes-Printzios DG, Ioakeimidis NK, Aznaouridis KA, Stefanadis CI. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:99–109. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yamada T, Hara K, Umematsu H, Suzuki R, Kadowaki T. Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular events in diabetic men: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e4367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Nehra A, et al. The Princeton III Consensus recommendations for the management of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:766–778. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.06.015. This manuscript details how erectile dysfunction is an early symptom of cardiovascular disease. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Jannini EA, McCabe MP, Salonia A, Montorsi F, Sachs BD. Organic versus psychogenic? The Manichean diagnosis in sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1726–1733. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Corona G, et al. Impairment of couple relationship in male patients with sexual dysfunction is associated with overt hypogonadism. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2591–2600. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Corona G, et al. Male sexuality and cardiovascular risk A cohort study in patients with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1918–1927. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Althof SE, Rosen RC, Perelman MA, Rubio-Aurioles E. Standard operating procedures for taking a sexual history. J Sex Med. 2013;10:26–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ghanem HM, Salonia A, Martin-Morales A. SOP: physical examination and laboratory testing for men with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2013;10:108–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Buvat J, Maggi M, Guay A, Torres LO. Testosterone deficiency in men: systematic review and standard operating procedures for diagnosis and treatment. J Sex Med. 2013;10:245–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02783.x. A detailed review of testosterone deficiency, including current management modalities. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Rastrelli G, et al. Flaccid penile acceleration as a marker of cardiovascular risk in men without classical risk factors. J Sex Med. 2014;11:173–186. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Corona G, et al. Penile doppler ultrasound in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED): role of peak systolic velocity measured in the flaccid state in predicting arteriogenic ED and silent coronary artery disease. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2623–2634. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ, Brock G, Morales AM. Standardization of vascular assessment of erectile dysfunction: standard operating procedures for duplex ultrasound. J Sex Med. 2013;10:120–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Esposito K. Lifestyle modifications and erectile dysfunction: what can be expected? Asian J Androl. 2015;17:5–10. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.137687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Esposito K, et al. Dietary factors in erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:370–374. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hannan JL, Heaton JPW, Adams MA. Recovery of erectile function in aging hypertensive and normotensive rats using exercise and caloric restriction. J Sex Med. 2007;4:886–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kolotkin RL, et al. Improvements in sexual quality of life after moderate weight loss. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20:487–492. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2008.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Belardinelli R, Lacalaprice F, Faccenda E, Purcaro A, Perna G. Effects of short-term moderate exercise training on sexual function in male patients with chronic stable heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kupelian V, Link CL, McKinlay JB. Association between smoking, passive smoking, and erectile dysfunction: results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Eur Urol. 2007;52:416–422. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Polsky JY, Aronson KJ, Heaton JP, Adams MA. Smoking and other lifestyle factors in relation to erectile dysfunction. BJU Int. 2005;96:1355–1359. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Pourmand G, Alidaee MR, Rasuli S, Maleki A, Mehrsai A. Do cigarette smokers with erectile dysfunction benefit from stopping?: a prospective study. BJU Int. 2004;94:1310–1313. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05162.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Chew KK. Alcohol consumption and male erectile dysfunction: an unfounded reputation for risk? J Sex Med. 2009;6:2340–2340. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Arackal BS, Benegal V. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in male subjects with alcohol dependence. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49:109–112. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.33257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Aghighi A, Grigoryan VH, Delavar A. Psychological determinants of erectile dysfunction among middle-aged men. Int J Impot Res. 2014;27:63–68. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2014.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Schmidt HM, Munder T, Gerger H, Fruhauf S, Barth J. Combination of psychological intervention and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: a narrative review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1376–1391. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Hatzimouratidis K, et al. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol. 2010;57:804–814. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Goldstein I, et al. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1397–1404. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199805143382001. This seminal paper was the first time that sildenafil was used as treatment for erectile dysfunction. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Yuan J, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;63:902–912. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Corbin JD. Mechanisms of action of PDE5 inhibition in erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16:S4–S7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Nichols DJ, Muirhead GJ, Harness JA. Pharmacokinetics of sildenafil after single oral doses in healthy male subjects: absolute bioavailability, food effects and dose proportionality. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53:S5–S12. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.00027.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Curran M, Keating G. Tadalafil. Drugs. 2003;63:2203–2212. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363200-00004. discussion 2213–2214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Jung J, et al. Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of avanafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor: a single- and multiple-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study in healthy Korean male volunteers. Clin Ther. 2010;32:1178–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Porst H, et al. SOP conservative (medical and mechanical) treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2013;10:130–171. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Stuckey BG, et al. Sildenafil citrate for treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with type 1 diabetes: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:279–284. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Boulton AJ, Selam JL, Sweeney M, Ziegler D. Sildenafil citrate for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2001;44:1296–1301. doi: 10.1007/s001250100656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Shabsigh R. Testosterone therapy in erectile dysfunction and hypogonadism. J Sex Med. 2005;2:785–792. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Padma-Nathan H, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of postoperative nightly sildenafil citrate for the prevention of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20:479–486. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2008.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Zelefsky MJ, et al. Prophylactic sildenafil citrate improves select aspects of sexual function in men treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2014;192:868–874. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.097. This manuscript shows the benefit of sidenafil in decreasing the incidence of erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Corona G, Razzoli E, Forti G, Maggi M. The use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors with concomitant medications. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31:799–808. doi: 10.1007/BF03349261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Giuliano F, Jackson G, Montorsi F, Martin-Morales A, Raillard P. Safety of sildenafil citrate: review of 67 double-blind placebo-controlled trials and the postmarketing safety database. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:240–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02254.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bosshardt RJ, Farwerk R, Sikora R, Sohn M, Jakse G. Objective measurement of the effectiveness, therapeutic success and dynamic mechanisms of the vacuum device. Br J Urol. 1995;75:786–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Price DE, et al. The management of impotence in diabetic men by vacuum tumescence therapy. Diabet Med. 1991;8:964–967. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Levine LA, Dimitriou RJ. Vacuum constriction and external erection devices in erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28:335–341. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70142-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Baltaci S, Aydos K, Kosar A, Anafarta K. Treating erectile dysfunction with a vacuum tumescence device: a retrospective analysis of acceptance and satisfaction. Br J Urol. 1995;76:757–760. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Ganem JP, Lucey DT, Janosko EO, Carson CC. Unusual complications of the vacuum erection device. Urology. 1998;51:627–631. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00706-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Raina R, et al. Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:77–81. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Moreland RB, Kim N, Nehra A, Goldstein I, Traish A. Functional prostaglandin E (EP) receptors in human penile corpus cavernosum. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:362–368. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Padma-Nathan H, et al. Treatment of men with erectile dysfunction with transurethral alprostadil Medicated Urethral System for Erection (MUSE) Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701023360101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Williams G, et al. Efficacy and safety of transurethral alprostadil therapy in men with erectile dysfunction MUSE Study Group. Br J Urol. 1998;81:889–894. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.McCullough AR, et al. Recovery of erectile function after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy and penile rehabilitation with nightly intraurethralalprostadil versus sildenafil citrate. J Urol. 2010;183:2451–2456. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Guay AT, Perez JB, Velasquez E, Newton RA, Jacobson JP. Clinical experience with intraurethralalprostadil (MUSE) in the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction. A retrospective study Medicated urethral system for erection. Eur Urol. 2000;38:671–676. doi: 10.1159/000020360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Costabile RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of transurethral alprostadil in patients with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1998;160:1325–1328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Virag R, Shoukry K, Floresco J, Nollet F, Greco E. Intracavernous self-injection of vasoactive drugs in the treatment of impotence: 8-year experience with 615 cases. J Urol. 1991;145:287–292. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38316-7. discussion 292–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Nelson CJ, et al. Injection anxiety and pain in men using intracavernosal injection therapy after radical pelvic surgery. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2559–2565. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Heaton JP, et al. Intracavernosal alprostadil is effective for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in diabetic men. Int J Impot Res. 2001;13:317–321. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Althof SE, et al. Why do so many people drop out from auto-injection therapy for impotence? J Sex Marital Ther. 1989;15:121–129. doi: 10.1080/00926238908403816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Weiss JN, Badlani GH, Ravalli R, Brettschneider N. Reasons for high drop-out rate with self-injection therapy for impotence. Int J Impot Res. 1994;6:171–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Mulhall JP, et al. The causes of patient dropout from penile self-injection therapy for impotence. J Urol. 1999;162:1291–1294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Linet OI, Ogrinc FG. Efficacy and safety of intracavernosal alprostadil in men with erectile dysfunction. The Alprostadil Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:873–877. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199604043341401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Tal R, Teloken P, Mulhall JP. Erectile function rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: practice patterns among AUA members. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2370–2376. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02355.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Trost LW, McCaslin R, Linder B, Hellstrom WJ. Long-term outcomes of penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10:353–366. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Zermann DH, Kutzenberger J, Sauerwein D, Schubert J, Loeffler U. Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long-term follow-up. J Urol. 2006;175:1041–1044. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00344-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001;166:932–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Levine LA, Lenting E. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1997;158:2149–2152. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68184-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Bergamaschi F, Rigatti P. Patient–partner satisfaction with semirigid penile prostheses for Peyronie’s disease: a 5-year follow-up study. J Urol. 1993;150:1819–1821. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35904-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Wilson SK, Delk JR., 2nd A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152:1121–1123. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32519-3. This manuscript describes a technique used to correct Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction in the same procedure. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1880–1889. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Dhar NB, Angermeir KW, Montague DK. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2006;176:2599–2601. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Hellstrom WJ, et al. Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:501–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01626.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJ. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med. 2013;10:893–906. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Rajpurkar A, Dhabuwala CB. Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. J Urol. 2003;170:159–163. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000072524.82345.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Vardi Y, et al. Evaluation of penile revascularization for erectile dysfunction: a 10-year follow-up. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16:181–186. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Wespes E, Wildschutz T, Roumeguere T, Schulman CC. The place of surgery for vascular impotence in the third millennium. J Urol. 2003;170:1284–1286. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086160.63566.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Manning M, et al. Long-term follow up and selection criteria for penile revascularization in erectile failure. J Urol. 1998;160:1680–1684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Sohn M, Martin-Morales A. In: Surgical Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction. Porst JB, editor. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 172.Montague DK, et al. Chapter 1: the management of erectile dysfunction: an AUA update. J Urol. 2005;174:230–239. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000164463.19239.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Araujo AB, Durante R, Feldman HA, Goldstein I, McKinlay JB. The relationship between depressive symptoms and male erectile dysfunction: cross-sectional results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Psychosom Med. 1998;60:458–465. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199807000-00011. This is an important study, as it helps to define the relationship between erectile dysfunction and depression. The MMAS provides population-based data that demonstrate sound evidence for this relationship. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP, Roth AJ. The association between erectile dysfunction and depressive symptoms in men treated for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2011;8:560–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02127.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Shabsigh R, et al. Increased incidence of depressive symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1998;52:848–852. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00292-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Shiri R, et al. Bidirectional relationship between depression and erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2007;177:669–673. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Mallis D, et al. Psychiatric morbidity is frequently undetected in patients with erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2005;174:1913–1916. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000176746.73667.3c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Hedon F. Anxiety and erectile dysfunction: a global approach to ED enhances results and quality of life. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:S16–S19. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Hale VE, Strassberg DS. The role of anxiety on sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 1990;19:569–581. doi: 10.1007/BF01542466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Beck JG, Barlow DH. The effects of anxiety and attentional focus on sexual responding — II: cognitive and affective patterns in erectile dysfunction. Behav Res Ther. 1986;24:19–26. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(86)90145-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.de Boer BJ, Bots ML, Nijeholt AA, Moors JP, Verheij TJ. The prevalence of bother, acceptance, and need for help in men with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2005;2:445–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Nelson CJ, et al. Men’s experience with penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: a qualitative study with the goal of informing a therapeutic intervention. Psychooncology. 2015;24:1646–1654. doi: 10.1002/pon.3771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Schover LR, et al. Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95:1773–1785. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Sundaram CP, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients receiving injection therapy for erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:932–935. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Huang SA, Lie JD. Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors in the management of erectile dysfunction. P T. 2013;38:407–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Jiann BP, Yu CC, Tsai JY. Compliance of sildenafil treatment for erectile dysfunction and factors affecting it. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:146–149. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Klotz T, Mathers M, Klotz R, Sommer F. Why do patients with erectile dysfunction abandon effective therapy with sildenafil (Viagra)? Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:2–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Lindau S, Laumann E, Levinson W, Waite L. Synthesis of scientific disciplines in pursuit of health: the Interactive Biopsychosocial Model. Perspect Biol Med. 2003;46:S74–S86. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Goldfarb S, Baron S, Lindau S. In: Women and Health. Goldman MB, Troisi R, Rexrode KM, editors. Academic Press; 2013. pp. 347–357. [Google Scholar]
- 190.Lindau S, Sandbo S, Goldfarb S, Dickler M. In: Cancer and Sexual Health. Mulhall JP, Goldstein I, Incrocci L, Rosen R, editors. Springer; 2011. pp. 415–455. [Google Scholar]
- 191.Fisher W, Rosen R, Eardley I, Sand M, Goldstein I. Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: the female experience of men’s attitudes to life events and sexuality (FEMALES) study. J Sex Med. 2005;2:675–684. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00118.x. An important study that furthers our understanding of how erectile dysfunction can affect a couple’s relationship and helps to define possible strategies that a couple could use to cope with the emotional strain caused by erectile dysfunction. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Jiann BP, Su CC, Tsai JY. Is female sexual function related to the male partners’ erectile function? J Sex Med. 2013;10:420–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.03007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Fisher WA, et al. Improving the sexual quality of life of couples affected by erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of vardenafil. J Sex Med. 2005;2:699–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Goldstein I, et al. Women’s sexual function improves when partners are administered vardenafil for erectile dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Sex Med. 2005;2:819–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00147.x. This manuscript describes the benefits to their female partner when erectile dysfunction is treated in their partner. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Tran SN, et al. Prospective evaluation of early postoperative male and female sexual function after radical prostatectomy with erectile nerves preservation. Int J Impot Res. 2015;27:69–74. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2014.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Albersen M, Shindel AW, Mwamukonda KB, Lue TF. The future is today: emerging drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2010;15:467–480. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2010.480973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Hakim L, Van der Aa F, Bivalacqua TJ, Hedlund P, Albersen M. Emerging tools for erectile dysfunction: a role for regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:520–536. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Hatzimouratidis K, Hatzichristou D. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: the day after. Eur Urol. 2007;51:75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.020. discussion 89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Burnett AL, et al. Future sexual medicine physiological treatment targets. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3269–3304. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02025.x. A good review summarizing future prospects being researched in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Chitaley K, et al. Antagonism of Rho-kinase stimulates rat penile erection via a nitric oxide-independent pathway. Nat Med. 2001;7:119–122. doi: 10.1038/83258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Gratzke C, et al. Activated RhoA/Rho kinase impairs erectile function after cavernous nerve injury in rats. J Urol. 2010;184:2197–2204. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Bivalacqua TJ, et al. RhoA/Rho-kinase suppresses endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the penis: a mechanism for diabetes-associated erectile dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:9121–9126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400520101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Jin L, et al. Elevated RhoA/Rho-kinase activity in the aged rat penis: mechanism for age-associated erectile dysfunction. FASEB J. 2006;20:536–538. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4232fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Albersen M, et al. Increased Rho-kinase 2 and an increase of synthetic smooth muscle-specific marker expression is observed in the corpus cavernosum of patients with severe erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2014;191:e526. [Google Scholar]
- 205.Oudot A, et al. Combination of BAY 60-4552 and vardenafil exerts proerectile facilitator effects in rats with cavernous nerve injury: a proof of concept study for the treatment of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor failure. Eur Urol. 2011;60:1020–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Albersen M, Linsen L, Tinel H, Sandner P, Van Renterghem K. Synergistic effects of BAY 60-4552 and vardenafil on relaxation of corpus cavernosum tissue of patients with erectile dysfunction and clinical phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor failure. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1268–1277. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.US National Library of Science. Multiple dose escalation study (14 days) to investigate safety, tolerability, PK and PD of vardenafil and BAY60-4552. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2010 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01110590.
- 208.US National Library of Science. Clinical proof-of-concept study for the combination BAY60-4552 / vardenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction not sufficiently responsive to standard therapy with PDE5 inhibitors. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2010 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01168817?term=NCT01168817&rank=1.
- 209.Melman A, Bar-Chama N, McCullough A, Davies K, Christ G. The first human trial for gene transfer therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 2005;48:314–318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.05.005. This manuscript describes the first human trial of gene transfer therapy for erectile dysfunction treatment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Albersen M, Weyne E, Bivalacqua TJ. Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: progress and future directions. Sex Med Rev. 2013;1:50–64. doi: 10.1002/smrj.5. This manuscript discusses the current status and future outlook of stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction treatment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Lin G, et al. Potential of adipose-derived stem cells for treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2009;6(Suppl. 3):320–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01190.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Bahk JY, Jung JH, Han H, Min SK, Lee YS. Treatment of diabetic impotence with umbilical cord blood stem cell intracavernosal transplant: preliminary report of 7 cases. Exp Clin Transplant. 2010;8:150–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Yiou R, et al. Safety of intracavernous bone marrow-mononuclear cells for postradical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction: an open dose-escalation pilot study. Eur Urol. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 214.US National Library of Science. Evaluate the use of liposuction and cell separation devices for autologous fat (adipose) derived cells to treat the symptoms of erectile dysfunction. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01601353.
- 215.US National Library of Science. Allogeneic human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in localized prostate cancer (MSC) ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01983709.
- 216.US National Library of Science. Autologous adipose-derived stromal cells delivered into the corpus cavernous in patients with erectile dysfunction. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2014 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02087397.
- 217.US National Library of Science. Can fat derived stem cells (SVF) be used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after prostatectomy. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02240823.
- 218.US National Library of Science. Safety of autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in erectile dysfunction. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02344849.
- 219.US National Library of Science. Evaluate the safety and feasibility of injecting PMD-MSC into the penis to treat the symptoms of mild to moderate ED (PMD-MSC-ED-01) ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02398370.
- 220.US National Library of Science. Safety and clinical outcomes study: SVF deployment for orthopedic, neurologic, urologic, and cardio-pulmonary conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015 [online], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01953523.
- 221.Michal V. Vascular surgery in the treatment of imporence; its present possibilities and prospects. Czech Med. 1980;3:213–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Brindley GS. Cavernosal α-blockade: a new technique for investigating and treating erectile impotence. Br J Psychiaty. 1983;143:332–337. doi: 10.1192/bjp.143.4.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoria. Circulation. 1976;54:522–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]