Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1990 Oct;43(10):817–819. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.10.817

Adenomyosis in Pakistani women: four year experience at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi.

H Shaikh 1, K S Khan 1
PMCID: PMC502830  PMID: 2229430

Abstract

As part of a quality assurance programme at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan, all hysterectomy specimens were reviewed from January 1986 to December 1989. Adenomyosis was found in 237 of the 419 (56.5%) specimens studied. Of these 237 patients, 232 (97.9%) were parous and 196 (82.8%) were in the fourth and fifth decades of life. This high prevalence in parous women aged 40-59 years was significant. Fibroids, cervicitis, and endometrial hyperplasia were the most common associated diagnoses. Of all the associations studied, only endometrial hyperplasia was significantly more prevalent in the group with adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was stated as an indication for surgery in 69 patients and was confirmed by histopathology in 49 (71%). Preoperative suspicion of adenomyosis was present in 49 (20.6%) patients of all those ultimately found to have the disease. There is a high prevalence of adenomyosis in the population studied, which indicates that the condition may have been underdiagnosed in the past, especially as it is difficult to diagnose without surgery and hysterectomy is currently the only treatment.

Full text

PDF
817

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azziz R. Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1989 Mar;16(1):221–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bird C. C., McElin T. W., Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus--revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Mar;112(5):583–593. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90781-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EMGE L. A. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus. Its historical past and its present state of recognition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962 Jun 15;83:1541–1563. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(62)90170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee N. C., Dicker R. C., Rubin G. L., Ory H. W. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnoses for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Oct 1;150(3):283–287. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(84)90366-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Molitor J. J. Adenomyosis: a clinical and pathological appraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971 May 15;110(2):275–284. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(71)90620-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Owolabi T. O., Strickler R. C. Adenomyosis: a neglected diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Oct;50(4):424–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES