In the Discussion section (first paragraph, third sentence) on page 105 of the above-noted article, the sentence “The RNA architectures identified in our study were not predicted by in silico approaches (Pervouchine 2014), nor were they detected using recent high-throughput RNA structure sequencing techniques (Daines et al. 2011; Li et al. 2012)” was not clear and should instead read as follows: “The RNA bidirectional structural architectures identified in our study were not detected using recent high-throughput RNA structure sequencing techniques (Daines et al. 2011; Li et al. 2012), nor were they discovered by in silico approaches, although stem II of the Drosophila srp pre-mRNA was predicted (Raker et al. 2009; Pervouchine 2014).”
Accordingly, the following reference should be included in the References section:
Raker VA, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS, Pervouchine DD. 2009. Modulation of alternative splicing by long-range RNA structures in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 4533–4544.
The authors apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
This article has been corrected in both the PDF and full-text HTML files online.
doi: 10.1261/rna.058008.116