Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 Sep 20;11(9):e0163669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163669

Correction: Quantitative Amyloid Imaging in Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease: Results from the DIAN Study Group

Yi Su, Tyler M Blazey, Christopher J Owen, Jon J Christensen, Karl Friedrichsen, Nelly Joseph-Mathurin, Qing Wang, Russ C Hornbeck, Beau M Ances, Abraham Z Snyder, Lisa A Cash, Robert A Koeppe, William E Klunk, Douglas Galasko, Adam M Brickman, Eric McDade, John M Ringman, Paul M Thompson, Andrew J Saykin, Bernardino Ghetti, Reisa A Sperling, Keith A Johnson, Stephen P Salloway, Peter R Schofield, Colin L Masters, Victor L Villemagne, Nick C Fox, Stefan Förster, Kewei Chen, Eric M Reiman, Chengjie Xiong, Daniel S Marcus, Michael W Weiner, John C Morris, Randall J Bateman, Tammie L S Benzinger; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network
PMCID: PMC5029931  PMID: 27649320

There are errors in the published article. Incorrect sample sizes were reported in Table 4 and Table 6. The intended sample size calculation was based on two-sided two-sample t-test to estimate the number of participants per arm needed to detect the specified reduction in amyloid accumulation rate due to treatment with 80% power and two-tailed type-I error of p = 0.05 in a 12-month placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. The tables with corrected sample size values can be seen here.

Table 4. Longitudinal SUVR analysis for mean cortical regions in mutation carriers.

  MC_CER MC_BS MC_CW MC_TW MCRSF_CER MCRSF_BS MCRSF_CW MCRSF_TW
Baseline 1.73±0.58 1.15±0.35 1.08±0.31 0.99±0.14 2.54±1.28 1.43±0.63 1.53±0.73 1.43±0.56
follow-up 1.76±0.60 1.17±0.35 1.12±0.32 1.00±0.14 2.65±1.36 1.48±0.64 1.64±0.80 1.49±0.57
delta 0.03±0.11 0.01±0.07 0.04±0.07 0.01±0.03 0.11±0.26 0.05±0.10 0.11±0.17 0.06±0.11
delta% 1.63±7.04 1.51±6.30 3.34±5.88 1.29±3.54 4.19±11.07* 4.08±9.86* 7.03±11.27* 5.05±9.82*
p (follow-up vs. Baseline) 7.22E-02 1.39E-01 1.70E-05 8.12E-03 8.78E-04 6.25E-04 7.46E-06 1.14E-04
Rate 0.01±0.08 0.00±0.04 0.02±0.04 0.01±0.02 0.07±0.18 0.02±0.06 0.07±0.13 0.04±0.07
Effect Size 0.15 0.07 0.55 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.51 0.50
sample size (25% reduction in Rate) 11425 48016 819 1744 1712 1701 956 1001
sample size (50% reduction in rate) 2857 12005 206 437 429 426 240 251

MC_CER = mean cortical region SUVR using cerebellar cortex as reference; MC_BS = mean cortical region SUVR using brainstem as reference; MC_CW = mean cortical region SUVR using core white matter as reference; MC_TW = mean cortical region SUVR using total white matter as reference; MCRSF_CER = mean cortical region SUVR using cerebellar cortex as reference with RSF partial volume correction; MCRSF_BS = mean cortical region SUVR using brainstem as reference with RSF partial volume correction; MCRSF_CW = mean cortical region SUVR using core white matter as reference with RSF partial volume correction; MCRSF_TW = mean cortical region SUVR using total white matter as reference with RSF partial volume correction; delta = change in SUVR from baseline to follow-up; delta% = percent change in SUVR from baseline to follow-up; p is the strength of the difference between follow-up and baseline SUVRs based on a paired t-test; Rate = the annual rate of SUVR change; sample size is the estimated number of participants per arm needed to detect a 25% or a 50% reduction in amyloid accumulation rate due to treatment with 80% power and a two-tailed type-I error of p = 0.05 in a 12-month placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.

*percent change in MCSUVR significantly greater with PVC than without (p<0.0005)

†percent change in MCSUVR significantly smaller than CW referencing (p<0.01)

‡percent change in MCSUVR with PVC significantly smaller than CW referencing (p<0.05)

Table 6. Mean cortical measurement for longitudinal cohort participants with full dynamic PiB.

  MC_CER MC_BS MC_CW MC_TW MCRSF_CER MCRRSF_BS MCRRSF_CW MCRRSF_TW MCBP MCBPRSF
Baseline 1.83±0.59 1.18±0.35 1.12±0.31 1.02±0.16 2.80±1.33 1.50±0.64 1.60±0.71 1.54±0.62 0.62±0.45 1.33±0.93
follow-up 1.89±0.58 1.22±0.35 1.16±0.32 1.03±0.15 2.93±1.33 1.58±0.66 1.71±0.75 1.60±0.62 0.67±0.45 1.43±0.95
delta 0.05±0.13 0.04±0.06 0.04±0.05 0.01±0.04 0.14±0.29 0.09±0.09 0.11±0.12 0.06±0.11 0.05±0.10 0.10±0.22
p (follow-up vs. Baseline) 6.34E-02 1.98E-03 4.47E-04 8.39E-02 3.33E-02 2.02E-04 1.68E-04 1.19E-02 2.91E-02 3.84E-02
Rate 0.02±0.09 0.02±0.03 0.02±0.03 0.00±0.02 0.05±0.17 0.04±0.05 0.05±0.06 0.03±0.05 0.02±0.05 0.04±0.11
Effect Size 0.23 0.62 0.71 0.25 0.33 0.85 0.82 0.49 0.33 0.34
sample size (25% reduction in Rate) 4570 662 499 4072 2339 350 373 1034 2350 2192
sample size (50% reduction in rate) 1143 167 126 1019 586 89 94 260 589 549

MC_CER = mean cortical region SUVR using cerebellar cortex as reference; MC_BS = mean cortical region SUVR using brainstem as reference; MC_CW = mean cortical region SUVR using core white matter as reference; MC_TW = mean cortical region SUVR using total white matter as reference; MCRSF_CER = mean cortical region SUVR using cerebellar cortex as reference with RSF partial volume correction; MCRSF_BS = mean cortical region SUVR using brainstem as reference with RSF partial volume correction; MCRSF_CW = mean cortical region SUVR using core white matter as reference with RSF partial volume correction; MCRSF_TW = mean cortical region SUVR using total white matter as reference with RSF partial volume correction; MCBP = mean cortical binding potential; MCBPRSF = mean cortical binding potential with RSF partial volume correction; delta = change in SUVR from baseline to follow-up; p is the strength of the difference between follow-up and baseline SUVRs based on a paired t-test; Rate = the annual rate of SUVR change; sample size is the estimated number of participants per arm needed to detect a 25% or a 50% reduction in amyloid accumulation rate due to treatment with 80% power and a two-tailed type-I error of p = 0.05 in a 12-month placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.

Reference


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES