Abstract
The main aim of this study was to assess the oral health status and oral hygiene practices in children with impaired hearing and speech. A total of 76 children in the age group of 5 to 18 years of both sexes were surveyed and information about their oral hygiene practices, previous dental visit and oral health knowledge were obtained through a questionnaire. Around 61% of the children had never visited a dentist, 82.89% and 17.11% of them brushed once and twice daily respectively. More than 90% of them cared about their teeth as much as any other part of the body. 42% of the children had dental caries, and gingivitis was seen in 35% of the children and malocclusion in 19% of them.
Keywords: Hearing-impaired, Speech-impaired, Dental caries, Disabled.
INTRODUCTION
Children and adolescents with disabilities appear to have poorer oral health than their nondisabled counterparts. Oral health is an important aspect of health for all children, and is all the more important for children with special health needs. Because oral hygiene affects one’s esthetics and communication, it has strong biological, psychological and social projections.1 Variable access to dental care, inadequate oral hygiene and disability related factors may account for the differences.2 The type of dental care received may be determined more by the disability than the oral condition, compounding the chronicity of dental disease. Although there have been a number of studies concerning the oral health of children, in general, there have been relatively few investigations of the oral conditions of the disabled children.3
It is believed that the number of handicapped individuals is increasing in proportion to the general population.4 Dental care is the most common unmet health care need of disabled children.5
Studies have shown that all the common dental disorders affecting the normal population are to be seen in handicapped people (Franks and Winter, 1974). In the latter, these disorders may occur either more often with increased severity or at a younger age than might be considered usual for normal individuals. Accumulation of bacterial plaque has been identified as the main cause, of the two most common dental diseases (caries and periodontal diseases) are seen in handicapped and normal children (Bear and Benjamin, 1974).6,7
Data concerning the oral health condition of handicapped people are scarce. Most reports are based on an examination of small number of individuals, subjects with widely differing ages or with different handicapping conditions. Reports of oral condition restricted to deaf and dumb children in specific are lacking.
Children with hearing impairement constitute one of the major population groups of handicapped children. According to National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) of India in 2002, 0.4% of 1065.40 million children suffered from hearing impairement. Earlier studies on their oral health status reported poor oral hygiene and low utilization of dental services.8,9
Dental care is not a priority to families of the multi-disabled child. Improvement in oral health status can be achieved through on-site oral health care. More awareness of the dental care needs of these children is necessary.
Health care providers must have unique communication skills to deal with the special needs of deaf children. Programs designed to improve knowledge, attitude and behavior should be innovative to meet the special needs of this population.9
The aim of this study was to assess the oral health status and oral hygiene practices in children with impaired hearing and speech.
METHODS
The study was conducted in RV Integrated School for the Disabled which constitutes 76 speech and hearing-impaired children. After selection of the school, parents of the children were informed about the examination. The children were examined at the institution by using a mouth mirror, probe and daylight in accordance with the WHO survey recommendations, and caries, periodontal disease, malocclusion, oral health status and treatment needs were recorded on the simplified WHO oral health criteria and assessment form. Each examination took about 10 to 15 minutes.
Sociodemographic information, previous dental visits, toothbrushing and snacking habits, perceived dental problems and willingness to have dental check-up were obtained from questionnaires completed under the supervision of the parent/caregiver.
RESULTS
A total of 76 children, 47 males and 29 females, aged 5 to 18 years took part in the study (Tables 1 and 2, Figs 1 and 2). Majority of them had never visited the dentist (80.26%). Among those who visited the dentist most of them visited when they had dental pain (14.47%) and extraction followed by restorations was the most common treatment done. Around 71.05% and 56.58% of the children felt that fizzy drinks and sweets did not affect the teeth adversely. About 71% of them reported that brushing teeth prevent dental decay and more than 90% of them cared about their teeth as much as any other part of their body. 82.89% of them brushed once daily and 17.11% of them brushed twice daily, 42.11% of them brushed for about 2 minutes, 55.26% of the children were advised by parents to brush properly (Table 3).
Age group (years) | n | % | |||
5-10 | 24 | 31.58 | |||
11-15 | 32 | 42.11 | |||
>15 | 20 | 26.32 | |||
Total | 76 | 100 |
Gender | n | % | |||
Male | 47 | 61.84 | |||
Female | 29 | 38.16 | |||
Total | 76 | 100 |
n | % | ||||
Brushing teeth | |||||
Once per day | 63 | 82.89 | |||
Twice per day | 13 | 17.11 | |||
Cleaning teeth | |||||
Brush + Toothpaste | 74 | 97.37 | |||
Finger + Toothpowder | 2 | 2.63 | |||
Time of brushing | |||||
Morning | 63 | 82.89 | |||
Morning and night | 13 | 17.11 | |||
Duration of brushing | |||||
2 minutes | 32 | 42.11 | |||
> 2 minutes | 21 | 27.63 | |||
Parents | |||||
Do not watch but advise me | 42 | 55.26 | |||
Never cared | 14 | 18.42 | |||
Visiting the dentist | |||||
I never visited the dentist | 61 | 80.26 | |||
When I have dental pain | 11 | 14.47 | |||
Last visit to the dentist | |||||
Haven’t visited | 61 | 80.26 | |||
Last 1-2 years | 8 | 10.53 | |||
Treatment | |||||
No treatment | 65 | 85.53 | |||
Extraction | 6 | 7.89 | |||
Restoration | 5 | 6.58 |
Question | Yes | No | ||||||
n | % | n | % | |||||
Sweets affect the teeth adversely | 33 | 43.42 | 43 | 56.58 | ||||
Fizzy drinks affect the teeth adversely | 22 | 28.95 | 54 | 71.05 | ||||
Brushing teeth prevent dental decay | 54 | 71.05 | 22 | 28.95 | ||||
You care about your teeth as much as | 71 | 93.42 | 5 | 6.58 | ||||
other parts of your body |
Among, the 76 children enrolled in the study, the caries prevalence was 42% with the D/d component higher than 72% (Tables 4 and 5). 87% of the children required single surface or double surface restorations, the remaining were indicated for pulp therapy. Gingivitis was seen in 35% of the children with bleeding gums and calculus who required oral prophylaxis. The study showed that 19% of the subjects had malocclusion which constituted anterior openbite seen in 3%, crowding in 11% and class II malocclusion seen in 3%. Fractured anterior teeth were seen among 3.9% of the children examined.
Gender | Caries free | Caries present | Total | ||||||||
n | % | n | % | ||||||||
Male | 29 | 66 | 18 | 56 | 47 | ||||||
Female | 15 | 34 | 14 | 44 | 29 | ||||||
Total | 44 | 100 | 32 | 100 | 76 |
Age group
(years) |
n | Mean | Std dev | Min | Max |
Kruskal- Wallis Chi-sq |
p- value |
||||||||
5-10 | 24 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0.781 | 0.677 | ||||||||
11-15 | 32 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||
>15 | 20 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0 | 1 |
We observe that there is no significant difference between age groups with respect to the proportion of dental caries in the study population (p > 0.05).
DISCUSSION
Majority of the children had never visited the dentist for a check-up or treatment. These findings are similar to findings in previous studies on the disabled. This could be due to low priority of parents on oral health care.
There are many other difficulties faced by deaf children, leading to inequalities when they are compared with hearing people to access oral health care more so in young children with speech and hearing impairement.10
Very few children knew the harmful effects of sweets and fizzy drinks on their teeth but were aware that brushing their teeth daily prevented dental decay. These results are similar to the study conducted by Oredugba FA (2004) where only 8% of them gave correct answers to causes of tooth decay.9
A review article by Nunn (1987) states the dental health of children with a handicap is similar to that of ‘normal’ children. This article mentions that children with a handicapping condition have more untreated decay and have had more teeth extracted compared to their ‘normal’ counterparts.11
Caries prevalence in the present study was 42% and demonstrated a higher prevalence in the age group of 11 to 15 years in accordance with the study conducted by Rao et al (2001) in Mangalore, showed caries prevalence of 46% in 5 to 9 years and 48% in 10 to 14 years age group of children. In the present study, the results showed that the girls’ oral hygiene was better than those of boys similar to the findings by Rao et al.12
In another study conducted by Gupta et al (1993) in Calcutta, the caries prevalence was 55.9%.13 Damle et al (1995) reported caries prevalence of 78.3%. In general, it was observed that all the children had a very high decayed (D) component as compared to the missing (M) and filled (F) components.14 In our study also a very high decayed component was seen similar to the study conducted by Damle et al.
In a study conducted by Kumar et al (2003) in Bel-gaum, Karnataka, it was observed that periodontal health was generally poor in all the children. The results of our study showed 35% of the children had bleeding gums or calculus.15
CONCLUSION
There was a high prevalence of dental caries and the need for restorative care among the children of this study. There is a need for implementation and evaluation of a long-range public dental health care plan for children with disabilities. In view of the findings of this study, frequent maintenance visits and oral hygiene interventions, including prophylaxis, restorative care and evaluation of the oral tissues, is recommended. It leads to the conclusion that preventive care has to be implemented in this population to further prevent dental caries and periodontal diseases. There is a need for comprehensive oral health care programs for these children.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the children, parents, principal and staff members from RV Integrated School for Disabled, Benga-luru, who participated in this study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Mitsea AG, Karidis AG, Donta-Bakoyianni C, Spyropoulos ND. Oral health status in Greek children and teenagers with disabilities. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;26(1):111–118. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.26.1.705x15693372k1g7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Desai M, Messer LM, Calache H. A study of the dental treatment needs of children with disabilities in Melbourne, Australia. Aust Dent J. 2001 Mar;46(1):41–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Shyama M, Al-Mutawa SA, Morris RE, Sugathan T, Honkala E. Dental caries experience of disabled children and young adults in Kuwait. Community Dent Health. 2001 Sep;18(3):181–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Choi NK, Yang KH. A study on the dental disease of the handicapped. J Dent Child (Chic) 2003 May-Aug;70(2):153–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mouradian WE. The face of a child: Children’s oral health and dental education. J Dent Educ. 2001 Sep;65(9):821–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Franks AS, Winter GB. Management of the handicapped and chronic sick patient in dental practice. Br Dent J. 1974 Feb;136(3):107–110. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4803131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bear PN., Benjamin SD. Periodontal disease in children and adolescents. Philadelphia, USA: JB Lippincott Company; 1974. pp. 255–270. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jain M, Mathur A, Kumar S, Dagli RJ, Duraiswamy P, Kulkarni S. Dentition status and treatment needs among children with impaired hearing attending a special school for the deaf and mute in Udaipur, India. J Oral Sc. 2008 Jun;50(2):161–165. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.50.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Oredugba FA. Oral health care knowledge and practises of a group of deaf adolescents in Lagos, Nigeria. J Public Health Dent. 2004;64(2):118–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ubido J, Huntington J, Warburton D. Inequalities in access to health care faced by women who are deaf. Health Soc Care Community. 2002 Jul;10(4):247–253. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Nunn JH. The dental health of mentally and physically handicapped children: A review of the literature. Community Dent Health. 1987 Jun;4(2):157–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Nagaraja Rao G. Oral health status of certified school children of Mysore state: A report. J Indian Dent Assoc. 1985 Feb;57(2):61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gupta DP, Chowdhury R, Sarkar S. Prevalence of dental caries in handicapped children of Calcutta. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1993 Mar;11(1):23–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bhavsar JP, Damle SG. Dental caries and oral hygiene amongst 12-14 years’ old handicapped children ofBombay, India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1995 Aug;13(1):1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Naveen Kumar PG, Ashok Kumar BR, Ankola Anil, Tangade Pradeep. Dental caries and periodontal status of 12-15 years old handicapped children of Belgaum City, Karnataka. J Indian Dent Assoc. 2003;74:107–109. [Google Scholar]