Abstract
Purpose of review
Microvesicles (MVs, also known as microparticles) are small membranous structures that are released from platelets and cells upon activation or during apoptosis. Microvesicles have been found in blood, urine, synovial fluid, extracellular spaces of solid organs, atherosclerotic plaques, tumors, and elsewhere. Here, we focus on new clinical and basic work that implicates MVs as markers and mediators of endothelial dysfunction and hence novel contributors to cardiovascular and other diseases.
Recent findings
Advances in the detection of MVs and the use of cell type-specific markers to determine their origin have allowed studies that associated plasma concentrations of specific MVs with major types of endothelial dysfunction – namely, inappropriate or maladaptive vascular tone, leukocyte recruitment, and thrombosis. Recent investigations have highlighted microvesicular transport of key biologically active molecules besides tissue factor, such as ligands for pattern-recognition receptors, elements of the inflammasome, and morphogens. Microvesicles generated from human cells under different pathologic circumstances, e.g., during cholesterol loading or exposure to endotoxin, carry different subsets of these molecules and thereby alter endothelial function through several distinct, well-characterized molecular pathways.
Summary
Clinical and basic studies indicate that MVs may be novel markers and mediators of endothelial dysfunction. This work has advanced our understanding of the development of cardiovascular and other diseases. Opportunites and obstacles to clinical applications are discussed.
Keywords: Microvesicles, microparticles, endothelial dysfunction
Introduction/Background
Microvesicles (MVs, also known as microparticles) are small membranous structures that are released from platelets and cells upon activation or during apoptosis [1–6]. The budding process is characterized by sorting of protein cargo, blebbing then abscission of a section of the plasma membrane [7], and a loss of membrane asymmetry that results in the exteriorization of phosphatidylserine (PS) to the outer leaflet. Thus, MVs harbor a subset of cell-membrane lipids and membrane-associated proteins derived from their parental cells, including cell type-specific markers that definitively distinguish their origin. Microvesicles were first described as “platelet dust” more than four decades ago in studies of the coagulant activity of platelet-rich plasma during storage [8]. A major conceptual advance occurred with the realization that MVs in plasma transport biologically significant amounts of tissue factor (TF), a transmembrane molecule that functions as a potent initiator of coagulation [9]. Now, MVs are understood to comprise a complex of molecules that facilitate TF action, such as exteriorized PS, which enhances clot propagation [3], and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL1), which targets TF-positive MVs to exposed P-selectin on activated platelets [10,11].
Nevertheless, studies in several settings from our group [4,5] and others [12] indicate that only a minority of MVs are TF-positive [4,5,12]. Thus, MVs might arise from, or mediate, novel physiologic and pathologic effects that are independent from coagulation. During the past dozen years, investigations of MVs have spread from the field of coagulation to atherosclerosis and vascular biology [2,4,5,13,14], diabetes [15,16], infectious diseases [17–20], rheumatology and autoimmunity [21–23], and cancer [24–29]. MVs have been found in blood, urine, synovial fluid, extracellular spaces of solid organs, atheromata, tumors, and elsewhere [30].
The formation, composition, catabolism, measurement, and general functions of MVs have been the subject of recent studies and review articles [30–35]. Here, we focus on new work implicating MVs as markers and mediators of endothelial dysfunction.
Vascular endothelium plays a crucial role in regulating vascular tone and structure. In healthy states, the endothelium also inhibits leukocyte and platelet adhesion and maintains a balance of profibrinolytic over prothrombotic activities [36–38]. Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by a shift towards inappropriate or maladaptive vascular tone, leukocyte recruitment, and thrombosis [37]. Examples of clinically important vascular dysregulation include chronic hypertension and impaired endothelial-dependent vasodilation in response to key physiologic stimuli, such as hypoxia, flow, and insulin. Healthy responses to hypoxia and flow increase local blood flow and hence oxygen delivery [39]. Insulin-mediated vasodilation increases the flow of blood through striated muscle, to facilitate the normal postprandial uptake of glucose from plasma [40]. In each of these situations, MVs originating from endothelium and other sources may indicate or contribute to vascular dysregulation.
Microvesicles as potential markers of endothelial dysfunction
Studies of human subjects indicate that plasma concentrations of endothelial-derived MVs (i.e., MVs bearing unique endothelial surface markers) increase in obesity [41], physical inactivity [42], type 2 diabetes mellitus [43], end-stage renal disease [44], ischemic left ventricular dysfunction [45], and preeclampsia [46]. Importantly, the circulating levels of endothelial-derived MVs in these studies correlated with the degree of impaired vasodilation in these subjects [41–47]. Likewise, studies of patients with hypertension [48,49] or sickle cell disease [50] have indicated that plasma concentrations of endothelial- [48], platelet- [49], or erythrocyte- [50] derived MVs correlate with circulating endothelial markers of sterile inflammation (soluble VCAM-1, soluble CD40L) and a pro-thrombotic state (von Willebrand factor).
Interventions related to many conventional cardiovascular risk factors and therapies have been reported to affect the generation of MVs from different cell types in vivo and in culture [4,5,35,51]. Consumption of consecutive high-fat meals by type 2 diabetic patients has been associated with impaired flow-mediated vasodilation and elevated plasma concentrations of endothelial-derived MVs [52]. Similarly, brief secondhand smoke exposure also impaired flow-mediated vasodilation and substantially increased plasma levels of endothelial-derived MVs [53]. Separate administration of an LDL-lowering agent (simvastatin), an angiotensin II receptor blocker (losartan), or an antihypertensive calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) to patients with high blood pressure reduced circulating levels of endothelial- and platelet-derived MVs, as well as soluble VCAM-1 [54,55]. Cholesterol-enrichment of cultured human cells, in the absence other stimuli [4], or exposure of human cells to tobacco smoke [5,51] markedly increased the production of pro-coagulant MVs, in part through apoptosis and MAP kinase activation [5,51].
Normal or elevated plasma concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) have long been associated with lower rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events [56–61]. A few clinical studies have reported that circulating levels of MVs from platelets [49] and TF-positive MVs from T cells or neutrophils [16] negatively correlate with plasma HDL levels. In addition to its presumed mediation of ‘reverse’ cholesterol transport from peripheral tissues to the liver [62–64], HDL may also exert a protective role on endothelial function by enhancing eNOS expression and NO release [65–67] and by indirectly inhibiting apoptosis [68] and the generation of MVs [16,49,69]. Each of these actions could affect plasma concentrations of MVs.
Regarding prognosis, several studies indicate that circulating endothelial-derived MVs can predict hemodynamic severity or poor outcomes in pulmonary hypertension [70,71], cardiovascular mortality in end-stage renal disease [72], and subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure or at high risk of coronary artery disease [73,74].
The clinical work discussed above suggests that plasma concentrations of MVs could serve as a new biomarker of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases [73,75]. Nonetheless, merely correlating with a bad clinical state or with future outcomes is not enough for a marker to be useful. It must be relatively easy to measure, consistent, and reproducible; and it must add significant predictive power over conventional risk factors. Assay methods for MVs include flow cytometry; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using plates coated with immobilized annexin V (a protein that preferentially binds exposed PS); brief ultracentrifugation; electron microscopy; and fluorescence confocal microscopy. Flow cytometry remains the most commonly used method for both enumeration and determinations of the cellular origin of MVs, but it is expensive, slow, and cannot currently detect MVs smaller than 200 nm [31,76,77]. In the past few years, new techniques have appeared for MV determination, including atomic force microscopy, dynamic light scattering, enhanced laser microscopy tracking proteomic analysis, and impedance-based flow cytometry [31,76,77]. These new methods are still far from routine practical use for MV assessment. For all of these methods, ease and reproducibility within usual clinical laboratory standards remain unverified, and fresh or promptly fixed samples must be used, which could be inconvenient. Most importantly, no studies of any clinical endpoint to our knowledge have compared the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for conventional risk factors vs. those factors plus measurements of plasma MV concentrations. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the predictive value, discrimination, and reclassification power that are required to demonstrate clinical utility of any proposed biomarker [78].
Microvesicles as potential mediators of endothelial dysfunction
Recent studies indicate that MVs are significant mediators of intercellular communication and may serve as shuttles promoting cellular cross-talk in physiologic and pathologic settings [31,33,79]. Their actions include transmittal of biologically active ligands, receptors, intracellular proteins, RNA including microRNA (miRNA), and even organelles [33,80,81]. Because MV release above baseline levels is stimulated by cellular activation or apoptosis, these vesicles are particular active in pathology [31,33,79]. Each activated or apoptotic cell can release many MVs, and owing to their small size, the MVs survive longer and diffuse more widely [17] than their parental cells, which are usually cleared quickly by phagocytosis [82]. Thus, the effects of MVs can linger long after their parental cells have disappeared, particularly in the context of disease.
Microvesicles from several abnormal clinical states have been shown to adversely affect endothelial function. Circulating MVs isolated from patients with myocardial infarction [83], metabolic syndrome [84], or obstructive sleep apnea [85] impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation ex vivo [83]. Moreover, MVs isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques, discussed in more detail below, provoke cultured endothelial cells to recruit leukocytes [86]. Basic laboratory studies have shown that MVs obtained from rats with pulmonary hypertension [87] or MVs generated in vitro using different stimuli on smooth muscle cells [88], endothelial cells [89,90] or, in some cases, T lymphocytes [91,92], can inhibit nitric oxide production by cultured endothelial cells [90,92] and by aortic explants ex vivo [88–91]. Moreover, these MVs also induce endothelial dysfunction in vivo [88,91,92]. In addition, MVs produced by stimulation of several cell types are able to induce endothelial cells to recruit monocytes in vitro. Microvesicles with this property come from stimulated platelets in vitro [13,93], from endothelial cells after inhibition of anchorage-dependent cell spreading [94] or exposure to angiotensin II [95], and from human monocytes after enrichment with cholesterol to mimic the environment within an atherosclerotic plaque [96] or by stimulation with LPS to mimic sepsis [97].
For several reasons, the pathways involved in the production of these biologically active MVs and then their recognition by endothelium appear to be active, regulated, and specific. First, MVs generated from calcium ionophore–treated endothelial cells [94] or isolated from the circulation of the patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis [86] cannot induce endothelium to recruit monocytes [86,94], indicating selectivity in MV composition. These observations presumably account for normally functioning endothelium in healthy individuals, despite abundant but quiescent MVs in their circulation. Second, the generation of MVs requires active cellular processes, including plasma membrane blebbing via actomyosin-based abscission [3,7,98]. Third, the process of plasma membrane blebbing preserves the boundary between intracellular and extracellular compartments and thereby avoids indiscriminant release of intracellular contents. Thus, activation signals have to be transported or created on the external surface.
In three clinically relevant circumstances, mechanistic details for the production then action of MVs that affect endothelial function have been reported. The first of these is MVs produced by human monocytes or macrophages upon enrichment with unesterified cholesterol in the absence of other stimuli (UCMVs) [4,96]. Cholesterol enrichment occurs in vivo when monocyte/macrophages ingest retained and aggregated lipoproteins in the vessel wall [99,100], damaged or senescent cells, and related debris. Because macrophages cannot catabolize the steroid nucleus, they must use other processes to accommodate exogenous unesterified cholesterol, including its transport into mitochondria for processing by CYP27A1, also known as sterol 27-hydroxylase [101]. In our experimental system, similar to atherosclerotic plaques in vivo [102,103], the pathways to accommodate unesterified cholesterol become overwhelmed, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis [4], and the release of MVs with biologically active danger signals that activate endothelium [96]. Consistent with this model, our previous work showed that removal of unesterified cholesterol in vivo from the tissues of genetically hypercholesterolemic animals can normalize leukocyte adherence to microvascular endothelium [104]. Strikingly, pretreatment of human microvascular endothelial cells (hMVECs) with a blocking mAb against LOX1, a pattern-recognition receptor, significantly decreased UCMV-induced endothelial activation and monocyte recruitment [96]. As noted above, MVs isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques are also able to induce endothelial cells to recruit leukocytes [86]. By promoting maladaptive immunologic [96] and thrombotic [4] responses, these vesicles may contribute to atherothrombosis and other pathologic conditions in vivo.
The second circumstance is MVs produced by human monocytes upon stimulation with endotoxin, to mimic sepsis (LPS-MVs) [97]. In contrast to UCMVs, which are generated by apoptotic blebbing [4], LPS-MVs result solely from cellular activation, with no induction of cell death [4]. These LPS-MVs stimulate cultured endothelial cells to express ICAM1, VCAM1, and E-selectin. Importantly, LPS-MVs contain IL-1ß and components of the inflammasome, including the NACHT, leucine-rich repeat-containing, pryin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3). Knockdown of NLRP3 in the parental monocytic cells reduced the activity of the LPS-MVs, and blockade of the IL-1 receptor on endothelial cells decreased MV-dependent induction of cell adhesion molecules [97]. These processes appear to be distinct from the sterile inflammation provoked by UCMVs or plaque MVs [4].
Finally, there is at least one circumstance in which MVs produced by stimulated cells can preserve normal endothelial function. The human lymphoid CEM T cell line was treated with phytohemagglutinin, phorbol-12-myristate-13, and actinomycin D to induce activation, apoptosis, and MV production (CEMT-MVs). These CEMT-MVs contained the morphogen sonic hedgehog (Shh) on their surface. Importantly, T cell-derived MVs isolated from human plasma also contain Shh on their surface [80]. The CEMT-MVs preserve NO release by endothelium in vitro and in vivo through an interaction of Shh on their surface with the Shh receptor, Patched, on endothelium, acting mostly through PI3K [81].
These studies indicate that MVs from different cell sources under different conditions can alter endothelial function through a several distinct pathways.
Conclusions
Clinical and basic studies indicated that plasma concentrations of MVs might serve as a marker of endothelial dysfunction and of underlying processes leading to endothelial dysfunction, such as monocyte or macrophage apoptosis. In addition, MVs may contribute to endothelial dysfunction through several pathways, depending on the cellular source and the activation signals that lead to the production of MVs. For MVs to become a clinical biomarker, easy assays with high reproducibility need to be developed, and the predictive power of circulating MVs over conventional risk factors needs to be clarified. As a mediator of endothelial dysfunction, the extent of their contribution in vivo remains to be clarified, owing to the lack of animal models that have selective defects of MV generation or uptake, in which atherosclerosis, sepsis, and other conditions can be induced.
Activation or danger signals on MVs may participate in healthy inflammation. Nevertheless, by promoting inappropriate or maladaptive vascular tone, leukocyte recruitment, and thrombosis, MVs may be novel contributors to the development of cardiovascular diseases.
Key points.
Microvesicles (MVs, also known as microparticles) are small membranous structures that have been found in blood and in atherosclerotic plaques.
Plasma concentrations of MVs have been associated with major types of endothelial dysfunction – namely, inappropriate or maladaptive vascular tone, leukocyte recruitment, and thrombosis. The usefulness of MVs as novel biomarkers remains to be systematically evaluated.
Microvesicles generated from human cells under different pathologic circumstances transport different sets of biologically active molecules and that alter endothelial function through distinct molecular pathways.
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding: This work was supported by American Heart Association (AHA)-Great Rivers Affiliate Beginning Grant-In-Aid (to MLL), Temple University Department of Medicine Career Development Research Award (to MLL), and NIH-HL73898 (to KJW).
References
- 1.Morel O, Toti F, Hugel B, Freyssinet JM. Cellular microparticles: a disseminated storage pool of bioactive vascular effectors. Curr Opin Hematol. 2004;11:156–164. doi: 10.1097/01.moh.0000131441.10020.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu ML, Reilly MP, McKenzie SE, Williams KJ. Cholesterol enrichment enhances the release of tissue factor-positive microparticles from THP-1 monocytes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:E103. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000254674.47693.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boulanger CM, Amabile N, Tedgui A. Circulating microparticles: a potential prognostic marker for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Hypertension. 2006;48:180–186. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000231507.00962.b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu ML, Reilly MP, Casasanto P, McKenzie SE, Williams KJ. Cholesterol enrichment of human monocyte/macrophages induces surface exposure of phosphatidylserine and the release of biologically-active tissue factor-positive microvesicles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:430–435. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000254674.47693.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5•.Li M, Yu D, Williams KJ, Liu ML. Tobacco smoke induces the generation of procoagulant microvesicles from human monocytes/macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1818–1824. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.209577. The first study to show that tobacco smoke exposure increases the release of procoagulant MVs that carry tissue factor and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms responsible for this clinically relevant effect. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martinez MC, Andriantsitohaina R. Microparticles in angiogenesis: therapeutic potential. Circ Res. 2011;109:110–119. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Muralidharan-Chari V, Clancy J, Plou C, Romao M, Chavrier P, Raposo G, D’Souza-Schorey C. ARF6-regulated shedding of tumor cell-derived plasma membrane microvesicles. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1875–1885. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wolf P. The nature and significance of platelet products in human plasma. Br J Haematol. 1967;13:269–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1967.tb08741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Giesen PL, Rauch U, Bohrmann B, Kling D, Roque M, Fallon JT, Badimon JJ, Himber J, Riederer MA, Nemerson Y. Blood-borne tissue factor: another view of thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:2311–2315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Falati S, Liu Q, Gross P, Merrill-Skoloff G, Chou J, Vandendries E, Celi A, Croce K, Furie BC, Furie B. Accumulation of tissue factor into developing thrombi in vivo is dependent upon microparticle P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 and platelet P-selectin. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1585–1598. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Polgar J, Matuskova J, Wagner DD. The P-selectin, tissue factor, coagulation triad. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1590–1596. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shet AS, Aras O, Gupta K, Hass MJ, Rausch DJ, Saba N, Koopmeiners L, Key NS, Hebbel RP. Sickle blood contains tissue factor-positive microparticles derived from endothelial cells and monocytes. Blood. 2003;102:2678–2683. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barry OP, Pratico D, Savani RC, FitzGerald GA. Modulation of monocyte-endothelial cell interactions by platelet microparticles. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:136–144. doi: 10.1172/JCI2592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mallat Z, Hugel B, Ohan J, Leseche G, Freyssinet JM, Tedgui A. Shed membrane microparticles with procoagulant potential in human atherosclerotic plaques: a role for apoptosis in plaque thrombogenicity. Circulation. 1999;99:348–353. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.3.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nomura S, Suzuki M, Katsura K, Xie GL, Miyazaki Y, Miyake T, Kido H, Kagawa H, Fukuhara S. Platelet-derived microparticles may influence the development of atherosclerosis in diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis. 1995;116:235–240. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(95)05551-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Diamant M, Nieuwland R, Pablo RF, Sturk A, Smit JW, Radder JK. Elevated numbers of tissue-factor exposing microparticles correlate with components of the metabolic syndrome in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2002;106:2442–2447. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036596.59665.c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aupeix K, Hugel B, Martin T, Bischoff P, Lill H, Pasquali JL, Freyssinet JM. The significance of shed membrane particles during programmed cell death in vitro, and in vivo, in HIV-1 infection. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1546–1554. doi: 10.1172/JCI119317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rozmyslowicz T, Majka M, Kijowski J, Murphy SL, Conover DO, Poncz M, Ratajczak J, Gaulton GN, Ratajczak MZ. Platelet- and megakaryocyte-derived microparticles transfer CXCR4 receptor to CXCR4-null cells and make them susceptible to infection by X4-HIV. Aids. 2003;17:33–42. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200301030-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Couper KN, Barnes T, Hafalla JC, Combes V, Ryffel B, Secher T, Grau GE, Riley EM, de Souza JB. Parasite-derived plasma microparticles contribute significantly to malaria infection-induced inflammation through potent macrophage stimulation. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000744. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kornek M, Popov Y, Libermann TA, Afdhal NH, Schuppan D. Human T cell microparticles circulate in blood of hepatitis patients and induce fibrolytic activation of hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2010 doi: 10.1002/hep.23999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Combes V, Simon AC, Grau GE, Arnoux D, Camoin L, Sabatier F, Mutin M, Sanmarco M, Sampol J, Dignat-George F. In vitro generation of endothelial microparticles and possible prothrombotic activity in patients with lupus anticoagulant. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:93–102. doi: 10.1172/JCI4985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Distler JH, Pisetsky DS, Huber LC, Kalden JR, Gay S, Distler O. Microparticles as regulators of inflammation: novel players of cellular crosstalk in the rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3337–3348. doi: 10.1002/art.21350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23••.Boilard E, Nigrovic PA, Larabee K, Watts GF, Coblyn JS, Weinblatt ME, Massarotti EM, Remold-O’Donnell E, Farndale RW, Ware J, et al. Platelets amplify inflammation in arthritis via collagen-dependent microparticle production. Science. 2010;327:580–583. doi: 10.1126/science.1181928. An elegant study investigating a potential role for activated platelets and their MVs in inflammatory joint diseases. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Silberberg JM, Gordon S, Zucker S. Identification of tissue factor in two human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 1989;49:5443–5447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abrahams VM, Straszewski SL, Kamsteeg M, Hanczaruk B, Schwartz PE, Rutherford TJ, Mor G. Epithelial ovarian cancer cells secrete functional Fas ligand. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5573–5581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huber V, Fais S, Iero M, Lugini L, Canese P, Squarcina P, Zaccheddu A, Colone M, Arancia G, Gentile M, et al. Human colorectal cancer cells induce T-cell death through release of proapoptotic microvesicles: role in immune escape. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1796–1804. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ratajczak J, Miekus K, Kucia M, Zhang J, Reca R, Dvorak P, Ratajczak MZ. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia. 2006;20:847–856. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Valenti R, Huber V, Iero M, Filipazzi P, Parmiani G, Rivoltini L. Tumor-released microvesicles as vehicles of immunosuppression. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2912–2915. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Al-Nedawi K, Meehan B, Rak J. Microvesicles: messengers and mediators of tumor progression. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2014–2018. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.13.8988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30••.Gyorgy B, Modos K, Pallinger E, Paloczi K, Pasztoi M, Misjak P, Deli MA, Sipos A, Szalai A, Voszka I, et al. Detection and isolation of cell-derived microparticles are compromised by protein complexes resulting from shared biophysical parameters. Blood. 2011;117:e39–48. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307595. The first study to point out the physical similarities between large protein complexes and MVs that can perturb detection and/or isolation of MVs in practical circumstances. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Freyssinet JM, Toti F. Membrane microparticle determination: at least seeing what’s being sized! J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:311–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03679.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pisetsky DS, Lipsky PE. Microparticles as autoadjuvants in the pathogenesis of SLE. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mause SF, Weber C. Microparticles: protagonists of a novel communication network for intercellular information exchange. Circ Res. 2010;107:1047–1057. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.226456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Morel O, Morel N, Jesel L, Freyssinet JM, Toti F. Microparticles: a critical component in the nexus between inflammation, immunity, and thrombosis. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33:469–486. doi: 10.1007/s00281-010-0239-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35•.Rautou PE, Vion AC, Amabile N, Chironi G, Simon A, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM. Microparticles, vascular function, and atherothrombosis. Circ Res. 2011;109:593–606. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233163. A comprehensive review regarding MVs and atherothrombotic diseases. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Landmesser U, Hornig B, Drexler H. Endothelial function: a critical determinant in atherosclerosis? Circulation. 2004;109:II27–33. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000129501.88485.1f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Endemann DH, Schiffrin EL. Endothelial dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1983–1992. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000132474.50966.DA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Feletou M, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture) Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H985–1002. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00292.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Simon MC, Liu L, Barnhart BC, Young RM. Hypoxia-induced signaling in the cardiovascular system. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008;70:51–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Muniyappa R, Montagnani M, Koh KK, Quon MJ. Cardiovascular actions of insulin. Endocr Rev. 2007;28:463–491. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Esposito K, Ciotola M, Schisano B, Gualdiero R, Sardelli L, Misso L, Giannetti G, Giugliano D. Endothelial microparticles correlate with endothelial dysfunction in obese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;5:5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Navasiolava NM, Dignat-George F, Sabatier F, Larina IM, Demiot C, Fortrat JO, Gauquelin-Koch G, Kozlovskaya IB, Custaud MA. Enforced physical inactivity increases endothelial microparticle levels in healthy volunteers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H248–256. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00152.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Feng B, Chen Y, Luo Y, Chen M, Li X, Ni Y. Circulating level of microparticles and their correlation with arterial elasticity and endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis. 2010;208:264–269. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Amabile N, Guerin AP, Leroyer A, Mallat Z, Nguyen C, Boddaert J, London GM, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM. Circulating endothelial microparticles are associated with vascular dysfunction in patients with end-stage renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3381–3388. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bulut D, Maier K, Bulut-Streich N, Borgel J, Hanefeld C, Mugge A. Circulating endothelial microparticles correlate inversely with endothelial function in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J Card Fail. 2008;14:336–340. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Meziani F, Tesse A, David E, Martinez MC, Wangesteen R, Schneider F, Andriantsitohaina R. Shed membrane particles from preeclamptic women generate vascular wall inflammation and blunt vascular contractility. Am J Pathol. 2006;169:1473–1483. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Werner N, Wassmann S, Ahlers P, Kosiol S, Nickenig G. Circulating CD31+/annexin V+ apoptotic microparticles correlate with coronary endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:112–116. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000191634.13057.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Preston RA, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, Mauro LM, Horstman LL, Valle M, Aime G, Ahn YS. Effects of severe hypertension on endothelial and platelet microparticles. Hypertension. 2003;41:211–217. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000049760.15764.2d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nomura S, Inami N, Shouzu A, Urase F, Maeda Y. Correlation and association between plasma platelet-, monocyte- and endothelial cell-derived microparticles in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Platelets. 2009;20:406–414. doi: 10.1080/09537100903114545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.van Beers EJ, Schaap MC, Berckmans RJ, Nieuwland R, Sturk A, van Doormaal FF, Meijers JC, Biemond BJ. Circulating erythrocyte-derived microparticles are associated with coagulation activation in sickle cell disease. Haematologica. 2009;94:1513–1519. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.008938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Li C, Liu Y, Yu D, Williams KJ, Liu ML. Exposure of human macrophages to tobacco smoke induces MMP14 expression and generation of proteolytically active microvesicles. Atherosclerosis Supplements. 2011;12:69. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tushuizen ME, Nieuwland R, Rustemeijer C, Hensgens BE, Sturk A, Heine RJ, Diamant M. Elevated endothelial microparticles following consecutive meals are associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:728–730. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Heiss C, Amabile N, Lee AC, Real WM, Schick SF, Lao D, Wong ML, Jahn S, Angeli FS, Minasi P, et al. Brief secondhand smoke exposure depresses endothelial progenitor cells activity and endothelial function: sustained vascular injury and blunted nitric oxide production. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1760–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nomura S, Shouzu A, Omoto S, Nishikawa M, Fukuhara S, Iwasaka T. Losartan and simvastatin inhibit platelet activation in hypertensive patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004;18:177–185. doi: 10.1007/s11239-005-0343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nomura S, Shouzu A, Omoto S, Nishikawa M, Iwasaka T. Long-term treatment with nifedipine modulates procoagulant marker and C-C chemokine in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thromb Res. 2005;115:277–285. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Barr DP, Russ EM, Eder HA. Protein-lipid relationships in human plasma. II In atherosclerosis and related conditions. Am J Med. 1951;11:480–493. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(51)90183-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nikkila E. Studies on the lipid-protein relationship in normal and pathological sera and the effect of heparin on serum lipoproteins. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1953;5:9–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gofman JW, Young W, Tandy R. Ischemic heart disease, atherosclerosis, and longevity. Circulation. 1966;34:679–697. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.34.4.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Miller GJ, Miller NE. Plasma-high-density-lipoprotein concentration and development of ischaemic heart-disease. Lancet. 1975;1:16–19. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92376-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gordon T, Castelli WP, Hjortland MC, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. High density lipoprotein as a protective factor against coronary heart disease. The Framingham Study. Am J Med. 1977;62:707–714. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(77)90874-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Assmann G, Nofer JR. Atheroprotective effects of high-density lipoproteins. Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:321–341. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Glomset JA. The plasma lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase reaction. Journal of Lipid Research. 1968;9:155–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pieters MN, Schouten D, Van Berkel TJ. In vitro and in vivo evidence for the role of HDL in reverse cholesterol transport. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1225:125–134. doi: 10.1016/0925-4439(94)90069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Shah PK, Kaul S, Nilsson J, Cercek B. Exploiting the vascular protective effects of high-density lipoprotein and its apolipoproteins: an idea whose time for testing is coming, part II. Circulation. 2001;104:2498–2502. doi: 10.1161/hc4501.098468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ramet ME, Ramet M, Lu Q, Nickerson M, Savolainen MJ, Malzone A, Karas RH. High-density lipoprotein increases the abundance of eNOS protein in human vascular endothelial cells by increasing its half-life. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:2288–2297. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00481-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Terasaka N, Yu S, Yvan-Charvet L, Wang N, Mzhavia N, Langlois R, Pagler T, Li R, Welch CL, Goldberg IJ, et al. ABCG1 and HDL protect against endothelial dysfunction in mice fed a high-cholesterol diet. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3701–3713. doi: 10.1172/JCI35470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Terasaka N, Westerterp M, Koetsveld J, Fernandez-Hernando C, Yvan-Charvet L, Wang N, Sessa WC, Tall AR. ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter G1 and High-Density Lipoprotein Promote Endothelial NO Synthesis Through a Decrease in the Interaction of Caveolin-1 and Endothelial NO Synthase. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010 doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.213215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mineo C, Deguchi H, Griffin JH, Shaul PW. Endothelial and antithrombotic actions of HDL. Circ Res. 2006;98:1352–1364. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000225982.01988.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li M, Yu D, Williams KJ, Liu ML. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) inhibits tobacco smoke-induced generation of procoagulant microparticles from human monocytes: a novel cardioprotective effect. Atherosclerosis Supplements. 2009;10:e1185. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Amabile N, Heiss C, Real WM, Minasi P, McGlothlin D, Rame EJ, Grossman W, De Marco T, Yeghiazarians Y. Circulating endothelial microparticle levels predict hemodynamic severity of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:1268–1275. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200710-1458OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Amabile N, Heiss C, Chang V, Angeli FS, Damon L, Rame EJ, McGlothlin D, Grossman W, De Marco T, Yeghiazarians Y. Increased CD62e(+) endothelial microparticle levels predict poor outcome in pulmonary hypertension patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:1081–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72•.Amabile N, Guerin AP, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM, London GM. Predictive value of circulating endothelial microparticles for cardiovascular mortality in end-stage renal failure: a pilot study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr573. [Epub ahead of print] An analysis of the value of circulating MVs in predicting future cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nozaki T, Sugiyama S, Koga H, Sugamura K, Ohba K, Matsuzawa Y, Sumida H, Matsui K, Jinnouchi H, Ogawa H. Significance of a multiple biomarkers strategy including endothelial dysfunction to improve risk stratification for cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:601–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nozaki T, Sugiyama S, Sugamura K, Ohba K, Matsuzawa Y, Konishi M, Matsubara J, Akiyama E, Sumida H, Matsui K, et al. Prognostic value of endothelial microparticles in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:1223–1228. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Smalley DM, Ley K. Plasma-derived microparticles for biomarker discovery. Clin Lab. 2008;54:67–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76••.Gyorgy B, Szabo TG, Pasztoi M, Pal Z, Misjak P, Aradi B, Laszlo V, Pallinger E, Pap E, Kittel A, et al. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:2667–2688. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0689-3. A comprehensive review that discusses different types of cell-derived vesicular products, including exosomes, MVs, and persistent apoptotic bodies. The authors discuss the differences amongst these products and their potential involvement in human diseases. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77•.Yuana Y, Bertina RM, Osanto S. Pre-analytical and analytical issues in the analysis of blood microparticles. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:396–408. doi: 10.1160/TH10-09-0595. A review article that summarizes technical problems in the analysis of MVs in blood plasma. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Pletcher MJ, Pignone M. Evaluating the clinical utility of a biomarker: a review of methods for estimating health impact. Circulation. 2011;123:1116–1124. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.943860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Thery C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:581–593. doi: 10.1038/nri2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Martinez MC, Larbret F, Zobairi F, Coulombe J, Debili N, Vainchenker W, Ruat M, Freyssinet JM. Transfer of differentiation signal by membrane microvesicles harboring hedgehog morphogens. Blood. 2006;108:3012–3020. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-019109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Agouni A, Mostefai HA, Porro C, Carusio N, Favre J, Richard V, Henrion D, Martinez MC, Andriantsitohaina R. Sonic hedgehog carried by microparticles corrects endothelial injury through nitric oxide release. Faseb J. 2007;21:2735–2741. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8079com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lauber K, Blumenthal SG, Waibel M, Wesselborg S. Clearance of apoptotic cells: getting rid of the corpses. Mol Cell. 2004;14:277–287. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00237-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Boulanger CM, Scoazec A, Ebrahimian T, Henry P, Mathieu E, Tedgui A, Mallat Z. Circulating microparticles from patients with myocardial infarction cause endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2001;104:2649–2652. doi: 10.1161/hc4701.100516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Agouni A, Lagrue-Lak-Hal AH, Ducluzeau PH, Mostefai HA, Draunet-Busson C, Leftheriotis G, Heymes C, Martinez MC, Andriantsitohaina R. Endothelial dysfunction caused by circulating microparticles from patients with metabolic syndrome. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:1210–1219. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Priou P, Gagnadoux F, Tesse A, Mastronardi ML, Agouni A, Meslier N, Racineux JL, Martinez MC, Trzepizur W, Andriantsitohaina R. Endothelial dysfunction and circulating microparticles from patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:974–983. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86•.Rautou PE, Leroyer AS, Ramkhelawon B, Devue C, Duflaut D, Vion AC, Nalbone G, Castier Y, Leseche G, Lehoux S, et al. Microparticles from human atherosclerotic plaques promote endothelial ICAM-1-dependent monocyte adhesion and transendothelial migration. Circ Res. 2011;108:335–343. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.237420. An important study investigating the ability of MVs isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques to induce monocyte-endothelial interactions. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tual-Chalot S, Guibert C, Muller B, Savineau JP, Andriantsitohaina R, Martinez MC. Circulating microparticles from pulmonary hypertensive rats induce endothelial dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:261–268. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200909-1347OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Essayagh S, Brisset AC, Terrisse AD, Dupouy D, Tellier L, Navarro C, Arnal JF, Sie P. Microparticles from apoptotic vascular smooth muscle cells induce endothelial dysfunction, a phenomenon prevented by beta3-integrin antagonists. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:853–858. doi: 10.1160/TH04-12-0786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Brodsky SV, Zhang F, Nasjletti A, Goligorsky MS. Endothelium-derived microparticles impair endothelial function in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H1910–1915. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01172.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Densmore JC, Signorino PR, Ou J, Hatoum OA, Rowe JJ, Shi Y, Kaul S, Jones DW, Sabina RE, Pritchard KA, Jr, et al. Endothelium-derived microparticles induce endothelial dysfunction and acute lung injury. Shock. 2006;26:464–471. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000228791.10550.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Martin S, Tesse A, Hugel B, Martinez MC, Morel O, Freyssinet JM, Andriantsitohaina R. Shed membrane particles from T lymphocytes impair endothelial function and regulate endothelial protein expression. Circulation. 2004;109:1653–1659. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000124065.31211.6E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mostefai HA, Agouni A, Carusio N, Mastronardi ML, Heymes C, Henrion D, Andriantsitohaina R, Martinez MC. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and xanthine oxidase regulate nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species productions by apoptotic lymphocyte microparticles in endothelial cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:5028–5035. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.5028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Barry OP, Pratico D, Lawson JA, FitzGerald GA. Transcellular activation of platelets and endothelial cells by bioactive lipids in platelet microparticles. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2118–2127. doi: 10.1172/JCI119385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Huber J, Vales A, Mitulovic G, Blumer M, Schmid R, Witztum JL, Binder BR, Leitinger N. Oxidized membrane vesicles and blebs from apoptotic cells contain biologically active oxidized phospholipids that induce monocyte-endothelial interactions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:101–107. doi: 10.1161/hq0102.101525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95•.Burger D, Montezano AC, Nishigaki N, He Y, Carter A, Touyz RM. Endothelial microparticle formation by angiotensin II Is mediated via Ang II receptor type I/NADPH oxidase/Rho kinase pathways targeted to lipid rafts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1898–1907. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.222703. A study of mechanisms by which angiotensin II induces the generation of MVs from endothelial cells. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Liu ML, Scalia R, Williams KJ. Novel cholesterol-induced membrane microvesicles stimulate monocyte-endothelial interactions through engagement of the LOX-1 receptor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:E12. [Google Scholar]
- 97•.Wang JG, Williams JC, Davis BK, Jacobson K, Doerschuk CM, Ting JP, Mackman N. Monocytic microparticles activate endothelial cells in an IL-1ß-dependent manner. Blood. 2011;118:2366–2374. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330878. An investigation of endotoxin-induced monocyte MVs and their potential role in enhancing monocyte-endothelial interactions in the context of sepsis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Beyer C, Pisetsky DS. The role of microparticles in the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:21–29. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Williams KJ, Tabas I. The response-to-retention hypothesis of early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:551–561. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.15.5.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Williams KJ, Feig JE, Fisher EA. Rapid regression of atherosclerosis: insights from the clinical and experimental literature. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:91–102. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bjorkhem I, Diczfalusy U, Lutjohann D. Removal of cholesterol from extrahepatic sources by oxidative mechanisms. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10:161–165. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199904000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tabas I. Consequences and therapeutic implications of macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerosis: the importance of lesion stage and phagocytic efficiency. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2255–2264. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000184783.04864.9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Madamanchi NR, Runge MS. Mitochondrial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2007;100:460–473. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000258450.44413.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Williams KJ, Scalia R, Mazany KD, Rodrigueza WV, Lefer AM. Rapid restoration of normal endothelial functions in genetically hyperlipidemic mice by a synthetic mediator of reverse lipid transport. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis & Vascular Biology. 2000;20:1033–1039. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.4.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
