Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015 Dec 21;17(47):32044–32052. doi: 10.1039/c5cp06166k

Effect of salts on the solubility of ionic liquids in water: experimental and electrolyte Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory

Catarina M S S Neves a,#, Christoph Held b,*,#, Sultan Mohammad b, Miko Schleinitz b, João A P Coutinhoa a, Mara G Freire a,*
PMCID: PMC5033075  EMSID: EMS69882  PMID: 26575280

Abstract

Due to scarce available experimental data, as well as due to the absence of predictive models, the influence of salts on the solubility of ionic liquids (ILs) in water is still poorly understood. To this end, this work addresses the solubility of the IL 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([C4C1im][NTf2]), at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa, in aqueous salt solutions (from 0.1 to 1.5 mol kg−1). At salt molalities higher than 0.2 mol kg−1, all salts caused salting-out of [C4C1im][NTf2] from aqueous solution with their strength decreasing in the following order: Al2(SO4)3 > ZnSO4 > K3C6H5O7 > KNaC4H4O6 > K3PO4 > Mg(CH3CO2)2 > K2HPO4 > MgSO4 > KH2PO4 > KCH3CO2. Some of these salts lead however to the salting-in of [C4C1im][NTf2] in aqueous medium at salt molalities lower than 0.20 mol kg−1. To attempt the development of a model able to describe the salt effects, comprising both the salting-in and salting-out phenomena observed, the electrolyte Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (ePC-SAFT) was applied using ion-specific parameters. The gathered experimental data was modelled using ePC-SAFT parameters complemented by fitting a single binary parameter between K+ and the IL-ions to the IL solubility in K3PO4 aqueous solutions. Based on this approach, the description of anion-specific salting-out effects of the remaining potassium salts was found to be in good agreement with experimental data. Remarkably, ePC-SAFT is even able to predict the salting-in effect induced by K2HPO4, based on the single K+/IL-ions binary parameter which was fitted to an exclusively salting-out effect promoted by K3PO4. Finally, ePC-SAFT was applied to predict the influence of other sodium salts on the [C4C1im][NTf2] solubility in water, with experimental data taken from literature, leading to an excellent description of the liquid–liquid phase behaviour.

Introduction

The research relevance on ionic liquids (ILs) at both academic and industrial levels is undeniable.1 IL applications in aqueous saline media have gained a significant attention in the past few years.210 In particular, the preparation of IL-based aqueous biphasic systems (ABS),2 where the salt solution is used to control the solubility of hydrophilic ILs in water while allowing their recovery from aqueous effluents,24 or their use in the recovery of metals from leachates5,6 and to promote the separation and purification of the most diverse added-value products2,1113 has become a hot topic of research in the last decade. In addition to the direct applications of IL–salt aqueous mixtures, the description and understanding of the ions specific effects and molecular-level mechanisms responsible for the two-phase formation or salting-in/-out phenomena have also been attempted.79,1417

In general, the availability of models for the description of the ILs solubility in aqueous saline solutions is very important for the design of separation and extraction processes. Currently, empirical or semi-empirical methods are used for the description of the liquid–liquid phase behaviour of systems involving ILs. When dealing with water-miscible ILs and the formation of ABS, the most common approach is the use of the correlation originally proposed by Merchuk et al.18 to describe the binodal/solubility curve of the ternary systems. This correlation was developed to describe experimental data of polymer-based systems, and it was successfully extended to ABS composed of ILs.2 This approach was latter modified by Zafarani-Moattar et al.1921 in order to describe the temperature and pH effects on the binodal curve of each liquid–liquid system. More complex empirical correlations were also proposed in the past decade.2230 To fully characterize these systems, tie-lines may be estimated based on the description of each binodal curve combined with a mass balance approach.18 The reliability of tie-lines is often assessed by the Othmer–Tobias31 and Bancroft25 equations. This mathematical procedure is appropriate for the accurate description of available experimental data, and thus valuable in engineering design for well-defined and known systems and conditions, but it has a limited extrapolation capability, i.e., it can hardly be extended towards other concentrations, temperatures or pH ranges, as well as to new systems composed of other ILs or salts.

A more general modelling with a sounder physical–chemical basis that explicitly accounts for molecular interactions between species is thus highly desirable, and where activity coefficient models fit within. Zafarani-Moattar and Hamzehzadeh20 applied modified NRTL and a modified Wilson model to describe the phase behaviour of ABS formed by ILs and an organic salt. With this approach, the authors20 could also describe the pH effects. The modified NRTL model required five pH-independent adjustable parameters and four pH-dependent parameters.20 By applying the Wilson model, the number of adjustable parameters was reduced to two pH-independent parameters and four pH-dependent parameters. Although explicitly accounting molecular interactions, these parameters cannot be transferred to other systems or other temperatures, thus making this approach as limited as the empirical approaches described above.

Equations of state (EoS) bear good prospects as predictive models.32 Their parameterization, unlike those of activity coefficient models, is based on pure-component parameters which are valid independently of the mixture being considered. In addition, binary parameters might be used whenever necessary. These are usually transferable to higher (e.g. ternary) systems and are often temperature independent. Thus, EoS combine the advantages of requiring a very low number of binary parameters with the use of a small number of ready available (or easily estimable) pure-component parameters.33 This opens the door for developing predictive models, which are becoming the preferred approaches in different research fields at both academia and industry.34 To the best of our knowledge, EoS have not been previously used for modelling complex water + salt + IL systems.

The use of ePC-SAFT (electrolyte Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory) to model phase equilibria of electrolyte systems can be considered highly promising.3539 In order to apply ePC-SAFT to water + salt + IL systems both salts and ILs have to be characterized. For modelling inorganic salts with ePC-SAFT, ion-specific parameters are used. That is, modelling a salt solution requires pure-component parameters of the ions (e.g. Na+) that are independent of the salt which they are part of (e.g. NaCl, NaNO3). The newest strategy proposed35 allows describing also concentrated salt solutions by including dispersion effects between anions and cations. Different approaches have been proposed to characterize ILs using SAFT-based models. Among them, truncated PCP-SAFT (Perturbed-Chain Polar Statistical Associating Fluid Theory)40 was used assuming ILs as polar chain molecules. Using soft-SAFT,41 ILs were modelled as neutral chain molecules with association sites. Ji et al.42 applied hetero-segmented SAFT to model densities of imidazolium-based ILs by considering them as molecules comprising a chain-like cation and a spherical anion, each having association sites. Also classical PC-SAFT has been applied to model thermodynamic properties of ILs.4346 All these works neglected the Coulombic interactions of ILs or replaced them by association forces. In other recent works,47,48 it was shown that by considering Coulombic forces allowed the modelling of IL densities and gas solubility in ILs with higher accuracy compared to classical non-electrolyte PC-SAFT versions.

COSMO-RS (COnductor like Screening MOdel for Real Solvents)4951 already shown to be useful as a priori tool for the prediction of the phase equilibrium behaviour of systems comprising ILs.5254 However, and although being of a predictive character, this model inherently requires previous quantum chemical calculations to obtain the sigma-profiles of the different solvents/solutes – a harder task when compared with the calculations needed to apply ePC-SAFT.

In this work, the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in aqueous solutions of 10 different salts (not previously investigated) was measured at salt concentrations ranging from (0 to 1.5) mol kg−1, at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure. The effects of the cation and anion of the added salt and respective salting-in/salting-out phenomena are discussed. The experimental data were finally modelled using ePC-SAFT aiming at evaluating the ability of this EoS to predict the salt influence on the solubility of ILs in aqueous media.

Experimental

Materials

The solubility measurements were performed for the IL 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, [C4C1im]-[NTf2], obtained from Iolitec with a purity of 99% w/w, in aqueous solutions containing the following salts: potassium phosphate tribasic, K3PO4 ≥ 98% w/w pure from Sigma-Aldrich; potassium phosphate dibasic, K2HPO4 > 99% w/w pure from Riedel-de Haën; potassium phosphate monobasic, KH2PO4≥99.5% w/w pure from Sigma-Aldrich; potassium acetate, KCH3CO2≥99% w/w pure from Sigma-Aldrich; potassium citrate monohydrate, K3C6H5O7·H2O≥99% w/w pure from Sigma-Aldrich; potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate, KNaC4H4O6·4H2O≥99% w/w pure from Sigma-Aldrich; magnesium sulphate heptahydrate, MgSO4·7H2O≥98% w/w pure from Panreac; magnesium acetate tetrahydrate, Mg(CH3CO2)2·4H2O≥99.5% w/w pure from Sigma-Aldrich; zinc sulphate heptahydrate, ZnSO4·7H2O≥99.5% w/w pure from Panreac; aluminium sulphate, Al2(SO4)3·18H2O≥98% w/w pure from Riedel de Haën. To reduce the water content and volatile impurities to negligible values, the IL was dried at vacuum and at 353 K, using continuous stirring, for a minimum of 48 h. After this procedure, the IL purity was checked by 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectroscopy. The water used was double distilled, passed by a reverse osmosis system, and further treated with a Milli-Q plus 185 water purification apparatus. It has a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm, a TOC smaller to 5 μg L−1, and it is free of particles greater than 0.22 μm.

Solubility measurements

The solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in each aqueous salt solution (ranging from (0 to 1.5) mol kg−1) was experimentally determined at 298.15 K and at atmospheric pressure. The exception was Al2(SO4)3 that – due to its lower solubility in water – could only be studied from (0 to 0.75) mol kg−1. For the hydrated salts the concentrations reported were calculated without the contribution of the water complexed with the salt. The aqueous salt solutions were prepared gravimetrically in ultrapure water within ±10−4 g. Both the IL and the aqueous salt phases were initially vigorously stirred and allowed to reach mutual saturation for at least 48 h. This period was found to be the minimum time required to guarantee a complete separation of the two phases and to guarantee that no further variations in mole fraction solubilities occurred.55 The glass vials containing the two visible liquid phases were placed inside an aluminium block located in an isolated air bath capable of maintaining the temperature within ±0.01 K. The temperature control was achieved with a PID temperature controller driven by a calibrated Pt100 (class 1/10) temperature sensor inserted in the aluminium block. The solubility of the IL in the aqueous phase was determined by UV-spectroscopy using a SHIMADZU UV-1700 Pharma-Spec Spectrometer at a wavelength of 211 nm (using a calibration curve previously established and discounting for the salts absorbance whenever occurring). This wavelength was found to be the maximum UV absorption length for the studied imidazolium-based IL. The samples of the aqueous solutions were taken from the equilibrium vials using dry glass syringes at the same temperature as for the measurements. Samples of ≈ 0.5 g were taken and diluted by a factor of ≈ (1 : 100 to 1 : 500) (w/w) in ultra-pure water. The solubility results reported are an average of at least five independent measurements.

ePC-SAFT

Theory

The ePC-SAFT equation of state was used for the modelling of the salt influence on the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in aqueous salt solutions. Within ePC-SAFT, the residual Helmholtz energy ares of the system is calculated according to eqn (1):

ares=ahc+adisp+aassoc+aion (1)

The reference system in ePC-SAFT is the “hard-chain” fluid, which contributes with the Helmholtz-energy ahc to ares of the system. On top of that, perturbations due to short-range attractions are accounted for by dispersive van der Waals forces and by associative hydrogen-bonding forces, denoted with Helmholtz energy contributions, adisp and aassoc, respectively.56,57 Compared to original PC-SAFT, ePC-SAFT35,58 also accounts for long-range interactions between charged components via the Debye–Hückel contribution to ares, expressed by aion.

The thermodynamic description of one compound i requires three pure-compound parameters: segment number (miseg), segment diameter (σi) and dispersion-energy parameter (ui/kB). The compounds with association properties are described with two additional parameters: the association-energy parameter, εAiBi/kB, and the association-volume parameter, kAiBi.

The segment diameter and dispersion-energy parameter in the mixture of compounds i and j are modelled by combining rules of Lorentz and Berthelot, corrected with the binary parameters lij and kij:

σij=12(σi+σj)(1lij) (2)
uij=uiuj(1kij) (3)

The calculation of the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in each aqueous phase requires liquid–liquid equilibrium (LLE) conditions. In this context, the isofugacity criteria for each compound in the two liquid phases were used based on the fugacity fi for each compound. For water, the following relationship was applied:59

fiI=fiII (4)

For the salts and IL, the following relation was used:

(fanI)νan(fcatI)νcat=(fanII)νan(fcatII)νcat (5)

where νan and νcat are the number of anions and cations in the IL and salts, respectively.

Modelling strategy and parameterization

Applying ePC-SAFT to water + salt + IL systems requires the determination and knowledge of the pure compounds parameters. Water was described by a 2B two-site association model.60,61 This parameter set was chosen as it is specially suitable for biological solutions, and because the salt-ion parameters were fitted to data of aqueous solutions using the 2B water parameter set.60,61 The association behaviour of water is explicitly accounted for, whereas all other compounds were treated as non-associative species. The salts and IL were considered as fully dissociated into cations and anions. For the IL, this approach was applied due to the very low solubility of the studied IL in aqueous media. At such low concentrations, complete dissociation can be assumed. Furthermore, the modelling of electrolyte solutions requires the dielectric constant of the solution. According to our previous work,35 the dielectric constant was taken as the value of pure water, i.e., 78.4 at 298.15 K. This is a rough assumption, which is however necessary to apply the ePC-SAFT parameters for all ions considered in this work. The expression published by Cameretti et al.58 was used also in this work. For modelling [C4C1im][NTf2] using ePC-SAFT, the IL was split into the two IL-ions [C4C1im]+ and [NTf2]. The IL-ions were treated as non-polar non-associating chain-like species that were allowed to interact attractively via dispersion and Coulombic forces. The pure-component parameters of these IL-ions (miseg, σ, ui/kB) were fitted by Ji et al.47 to pure-IL density data. The pure-component parameters for salt-ions were taken from Held et al.35, except for the citrate anion (C6H5O73−). The salt-ions were modelled as spherical species with miseg=1, and dispersion interactions were allowed only between salt-ions of different charge. Dispersion forces between salt-ions/IL-ions, water/ IL-ions, and water/salt-ions were explicitly taken into account. The parameters of C6H5O73− were fitted in this work to density data and osmotic coefficient data of aqueous potassium citrate solutions. The result is illustrated in the ESI.† The ePC-SAFT pure-compound parameters used in this work are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

ePC-SAFT pure-compound parameters used in this work

Compound σi (Å) miseg ui/kB (k) kij with water
Watera 2.797161 1.204761   353.9561  —
[C4C1im]+ 3.637147 2.480547   218.14447 −0.016
[NTf2] 3.746947 6.010347   375.6547 −0.016
K+ 2.823235 1.00035   230.0035   0.2035
Na+ 2.823235 1.00035   230.0035   4.77 × 10−435
NH4+p 3.574035 1.00035   230.0035   0.06435
H3O+ 3.465435 1.00035   500.0035   0.2535
Mg2+ 3.132735 1.00035 1500.0035 −0.2535
Zn2+ 2.979835 1.00035 1250.0035 −0.2535
Cl 2.756035 1.00035   170.0035 −0.2535
NO3 3.298835 1.00035   130.0035   0.09835
C6H5O73− 5.0991 1.000   258.99 −0.25
HPO42− 2.162135 1.00035   146.0235   0.2535
PO43− 2.551635 1.00035   310.0035 −0.2535
CH3CO2 3.932835 1.00035   150.0035 −0.2335
SO42− 3.298835 1.00035   130.0035   0.2335
CO32− 2.442235 1.00035   249.2635 −0.2535
a

For water, the 2B association approach with the parameters εAiBi/kB = 2425.67 K and kAiBi = 0.0451 was used.

For modelling mixtures with EoS, binary interaction parameters are needed. The kij between water and [C4C1im][NTf2] was fitted to LLE data of that binary system at 298.15 K. The kij values between IL-cation and water as well as between IL-anion and water were considered to be identical. The kij parameters between water and salt-ions as well as between these were taken from literature.35 All kij values used in this work are listed in Tables 1 and 2. For modelling the LLE of the mixture water + salt + IL no further binary parameters were applied. Based on these parameters, the IL solubility in the pseudo-ternary mixture containing five species (water, IL-ions, salt-ions) was then predicted.

Table 2.

Binary parameters kij and lij between ions for ePC-SAFT modelling used in this work. All other binary parameters were set to zero

Pair kij Pair lij
Na+−Cl   0.31735 K+−[NTf2] 0.55
Na+−NO3 −0.30035 K+−[C4C1im]+ 0.55
Na+−CO32− −1.00035 Zn2+−[NTf2] 0.12
H3O+−Cl   0.65435 Zn2+−[C4C1im]+ 0.12
NH4+−Cl −0.56635 Mg2+−[NTf2]
K+−CH3CO2   1.00035 Mg2+−[C4C1im]+
K+−C6H5O73−   1.000
K+−HPO42−   1.00035
K+−PO43−   1.00035
Zn2+−SO42− −0.44635
Mg2+−SO42− −1.00035
Mg2+−CH3CO2 −0.99835

For the comparison between experimental and modelling results, ARD (average relative deviation) values were determined. The ARD between the experimental (exp.) and modelled (mod.) mass fraction of the IL, w1, was evaluated according to:

ARD=1001NPl=1NP|(1wlmod.wlexp.)| (6)

where NP is the number of experimental points for each IL– water–salt mixture.

The ARD for the solubility of the investigated IL in the aqueous phase of the salt-free solution was found to be 1.93%.

Results and discussion

Experimental results

The solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in each salt solution in concentrations ranging from (0 to 1.5) mol kg−1 was measured at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure. The detailed measured solubility data and respective standard deviations, in weight fraction and molality units, are presented in the ESI.† The experimental results obtained are depicted in Fig. 1 and 2. For an easier interpretation, the data are separated by cation and anion effects (the respective graphical representation in weight fraction is reported in the ESI†).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in water upon addition of potassium salts at 298.15 K with respective standard deviations: , K3C6H5O7; Inline graphic, K3PO4; Inline graphic, K2HPO4; Inline graphic, KH2PO4; Inline graphic, KCH3CO2; Inline graphic, KNaC4H4O6. The dashed line is the reference value for the solubility of IL in pure water.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in water upon addition of sulphate and acetate salts at 298.15 K with respective standard deviations: Inline graphic, Al2(SO4)3; Inline graphic, MgSO4; -, ZnSO4; Inline graphic, KCH3CO2; Inline graphic, Mg(CH3CO2)2. The dashed line is the reference value for the solubility of IL in pure water.

For some salts, namely KH2PO4, K2HPO4, Al2(SO4)3 and Mg(CH3CO2)2, a salting-in effect is observed for concentrations up to 0.20 mol kg−1. Above this concentration, the salting-out effect occurs for all salts studied. Furthermore, the solubility of the IL decreases up to one order of magnitude for the higher salt concentrations studied. Upon salt addition at 1.5 mol kg−1, the solubility of the IL is strongly decreased by ZnSO4 while KCH3CO2 has the lowest impact. In summary, at 1.5 mol kg−1 of salt, the IL solubility decreases in the following order of salts: ZnSO4 > K3C6H5O7 > KNaC4H4O6 > K3PO4 > Mg(CH3CO2)2 > K2HPO4 > MgSO4 > KH2PO4 > KCH3CO2. The salt Al2(SO4)3 is not in this sequence as its solubility in water is much lower than this sequence refers to. Nevertheless, at 0.75 mol kg−1, Al2(SO4)3 causes the strongest salting-out effect observed amongst all salts under investigation. In fact, the salting-out effect of this salt at 0.75 mol kg−1 is similar to that displayed by KNaC4H4O6 at 1.5 mol kg−1.

In addition to the salt-specific effects, also ion-specific effects can be observed from the experimental solubility data. In Fig. 1 and 2, the anion-specific (potassium salts) and cation-specific (acetates and sulphates) effects are illustrated. Fig. 1 shows that potassium-based salts decrease the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in water with the exception of K2HPO4 and KH2PO4 at low concentrations (<0.2 mol kg−1), for which a salting-in phenomenon is observed. This is analogous to what is typically observed considering proteins solubility in salt aqueous solutions.62 For the salts shown in Fig. 1, the salting-out strength observed at 1.5 mol kg−1 is according to: KNaC4H4O6 ≈ K3C6H5O7 > K3PO4 ≈ K2HPO4 ≫ KH2PO4 > KCH3CO2. This order follows the Hofmeister series63 and can thus be considered an expected result; the same series was observed at the presence of sodium-based salts in a previous work.7

Fig. 2 presents the effect of sulphate- and acetate-based salts on the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in water. These effects might again be assumed ion-specific. However, combined with the anion SO42−, the trivalent ion Al3+ induces a stronger salting-out than the divalent ions Mg2+ and Zn2+, followed by the monovalent K+. Therefore, the higher the cation’s valence, the stronger the salting-out effect of the salt over the IL in aqueous media. This trend is in good agreement with previous results.7,14 Nevertheless, for these salts, the concentration-dependent speciation has a strong impact on their salting-out inducing abilities and should also be considered.64

Predicting the salt influence on the IL solubility with ePC-SAFT: potassium, sulphate, and acetate salts

Besides providing novel experimental data on the ILs solubility in salt aqueous solutions, another objective of this work consisted on the evaluation of the capability of ePC-SAFT to predict the experimental behaviour. For this purpose, in a first approach, the binary parameters lij and kij (eqn (2) and (3)) were set to zero, which led to deviations larger than 50% between experimental and ePC-SAFT predicted solubilities. These results were however expectable; previous works59,65 have shown that binary parameters between the compounds are required in order to quantitatively model solubilities or LLE with ePC-SAFT in ternary or higher order mixtures, such as the systems studied in the present work. Hence, several strategies were applied by introducing binary parameters between IL-ions and salt-ions. The aim of these strategies was to determine binary parameters which are ion-specific, and thus transferable to other IL-ion/salt-ion combinations. This means that, for example, the binary parameter between K+ and IL-ion is valid for all potassium salts (i.e., for K3PO4 as well as for KCH3CO2). This approach allows semi-predictions as well as reducing the number of parameters used. To further reduce the number of binary parameters, the binary parameter between K+ and IL-cation was set equal to the binary parameter between K+ and the IL-anion. Among the strategies considered, it was found that these criteria could only be fulfilled by: (i) applying an ion-specific approach for the IL; (ii) using the pure-component parameters for the salt-ions proposed by Held et al.35 and reported in Table 2; and (iii) using the binary parameter lij instead of kij in eqn (2). The binary parameter lij between K+ and IL-ion was fitted to the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in K3PO4 solutions using the data shown in Fig. 1. This parameter is listed in Table 2. This procedure was found to be required for K+ and Zn2+. In contrast, all binary parameters between pairs of salt-anion/IL-ion were set to zero, as well as between Mg2+ and IL-ions.

The optimal strategy developed requires a maximum of one binary parameter between a salt-cation and the IL-ions. The results using this strategy are illustrated in Fig. 3 and 4. Fig. 3 shows that fitting the binary parameter lij between K+ and IL-ions to the data of IL solubility in K3PO4 solutions yields a quantitative description of the experimental salt-induced solubility of the IL. This is a promising result keeping in mind that usually several binary parameters are required to model the LLE of inorganic salt-containing or IL-containing mixtures. For instance, a recent work20 used up to 9 binary parameters to correlate the LLE behaviour of water/IL/salt systems. Even more promising, the availability of an ion-specific model, such as ePC-SAFT, allows the development of transferable binary parameters. In this line, the fitted lij parameter between K+ and IL-ions was further applied to predict the solubility of potassium-based salts other than the K3PO4 used for fitting the lij. The results are illustrated in Fig. 3 for systems with KCH3CO2, K3C6H5O7, and K2HPO4. Applying ePC-SAFT and the binary parameter lij for K+/IL-ions fitted to the solubility data of the water/IL/K3PO4 system allows predicting the salting-out of the IL from the aqueous phase with good agreement to the experimental observations. This is a quite good result, as these are modelling predictions; i.e., these data were neither used to fit the binary lij parameter nor any pure-component parameters. This statement might seemed weakened by the fact that the binary parameter was fitted to the system containing K3PO4, which induces salting-out in the whole salt-concentration range, thus showing the same influence upon the IL solubility as the salts KCH3CO2 and K3C6H5O7. Nevertheless, using the lij parameter, ePC-SAFT is also able to correctly predict the influence of K2HPO4 on the IL solubility, including the salting-in region and the solubility maximum at 0.1 mol kg−1 experimentally observed. This is one of the most remarkable achievements as the binary parameter was fitted to a system containing K3PO4, which induces only salting-out along all the concentrations studied. To the best of our knowledge, a thermodynamic model or an equation of state were never used and demonstrated to be able to describe these remarkable type of results (salting-in vs. salting-out).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in water upon addition of potassium-based salts at 298.15 K: , K3C6H5O7; Inline graphic, K3PO4; Inline graphic, K2HPO4; Inline graphic, KCH3CO2. The lines represent modelling results with ePC-SAFT using parameters from Tables 1 and 2.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in water upon addition of acetate-based salts and sulphate-based salts at 298.15 K: Inline graphic, (---) Mg(CH3CO2)2; Inline graphic, (---), KCH3CO2.; Inline graphic, () ZnSO4; Inline graphic, () MgSO4. The lines represent modelling results with ePC-SAFT using parameters from Tables 1 and 2.

Fig. 4 shows the influence of sulphate-based salts and acetate-based salts on the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in aqueous solutions. All these salts induce a salting-out of the IL from the aqueous (IL-poor) phase. As shown in Fig. 4, ePC-SAFT can reproduce adequately the IL solubility in the different salt solutions. ePC-SAFT correctly predicts the salting-out ability strength for all salts with the exception for ZnSO4, for which a binary parameter lij Zn2+/IL-ion had to be fitted to the experimental data. This limitation should be related with the ZnSO4 speciation64 that cannot be captured by the modelling approach used in this work. The species distribution of ZnSO4 in aqueous solution is highly complex and strongly depends on the salt concentration – cf. the ESI.† In order to describe this solution (and the salt-dependent IL solubility) adequately, the ePC-SAFT parameters for all species that will form (including the ion pairs) are required. However, this was outside the scope of this work as it would introduce additional binary parameters as well.

Predicting the salt influence on IL solubility with ePC-SAFT: chloride, nitrate, and carbonate salts

The previous results showed that one binary lij parameter between K+ and IL-ions, as well as between Zn2+ and IL-ions, are required in order to achieve a good description of the experimental data. Still, it must be stressed out that binary parameters between all other salt-ion/IL-ion pairs were set to zero and that the K+–IL binary lij parameters were shown to be transferable to different potassium-based salts.

Encouraged by these promising results, ePC-SAFT was further applied as a fully predictive model to describe the salt influence on the [C4C1im][NTf2] solubility in presence of a broad plethora of salts. Using the pure-component parameters for water, IL-ions, and salt-ions, the effect of the salt concentration upon the [C4C1im][NTf2] solubility in aqueous solutions of sodium- and chloride-based salts was further predicted and compared to experimental literature data.7 The objective of this attempt was the validation of the predictive capability of ePC-SAFT to describe ion-specific salting-out/-in effects.

Fig. 5 shows the experimental solubilities of [C4C1im][NTf2] in aqueous salt solutions and the predictions achieved with ePC-SAFT. The impact of chloride-based salts on the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] is depicted in Fig. 5a. Below a salt molality of 0.75 mol kg−1, all salts induce a salting-in of the IL, while NaCl induces a salting-out at molalities higher than 1.5 mol kg−1.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2] in water upon addition of (a) chloride and (b) sodium salts at 298.15 K. Symbols represent the experimental data taken from literature,7 and lines represent predictions with ePC-SAFT using parameters from Tables 1 and 2: Inline graphic, (), NaCl; Inline graphic, (– · –), NH4Cl; Inline graphic, (·· ··), HCl; Inline graphic, (– –), NaNO3; Inline graphic, (– · · –), Na2CO3.

Fig. 5b shows the influence of sodium-based salts on the solubility of [C4C1im][NTf2]. A salting-in phenomenon is observed for NaCl and Na2CO3 at low salt concentrations, followed by a salting-out at higher salt concentrations. In contrast, NaNO3 acts as a salting-in inducing salt in the entire salt concentration region. The strength of the salting-in of NaCl and Na2CO3 at low salt concentrations is very similar; however, Na2CO3 causes a stronger salting-out at higher salt concentrations. The molecular mechanism behind these salting-in/-out effects was established in a previous work.7

The experimental behaviour of the six systems described above is highly non-linear, unlike observed for many other molecules that follow a much simpler behaviour typically described using Setschenow coefficients.66 In Fig. 5, the predictive ePC-SAFT modelling results are compared with the experimental data for these systems. It must be again stressed out that neither pure-compound nor binary interaction parameters were fitted to data of the ternary water/[C4C1im][NTf2]/salt specific systems. The salting-in/-out effects of NaCl and Na2CO3 are predicted in good agreement with the experimental data. Also the stronger salting-out effect of Na2CO3 at higher salt concentrations is correctly predicted by ePC-SAFT. The model also correctly predicts the salting-out effect of the chloride salts upon the [C4C1im][NTf2] solubility. In summary, this prediction capacity of ePC-SAFT is remarkable given the complexity of the systems studied, with four ions in solution, and the highly non-linear behaviour of [C4C1im][NTf2] solubility in aqueous salt solutions.

In order to classify the results of the ePC-SAFT predictions, it should be noted that semi-empirical approaches using activity coefficient models, such as NRTL, require a large number of binary parameters. These allow correlating the behaviour of such complex systems. This work shows that the LLE behaviour of different [C4C1im][NTf2]–salt–water systems can be captured with ePC-SAFT in a predictive way, using only pure-compound parameters and ion-specific binary interaction parameters that are universally valid and ion-independent.

Conclusions

In this work, novel solubility data of the IL [C4C1im][NTf2] in aqueous solutions of ten different salts at molalities up to 1.5 mol kg−1, at 298.15 K and 1 bar, were determined. The salting-out of the IL from aqueous media was observed at salt molalities higher than 0.20 mol kg−1. At the fixed molality of 1.5 mol kg−1 of salt, the strength of the salting-out effect decreases in the order: ZnSO4 > K3C6H5O7 > KNaC4H4O6 > K3PO4 > Mg(CH3CO2)2 > K2HPO4 > MgSO4 > KH2PO4 > KCH3CO2. The Al2(SO4)3 salt at 0.75 mol kg−1, close to its saturation solubility in water, causes the strongest salting-out effect observed. Salts composed of cations with a higher valence are stronger salting-out agents. Some salts (KH2PO4, K2HPO4, Al2(SO4)3 and Mg(CH3CO2)2) also induce the salting-in of the IL at salt molalities lower than mol kg−1.

The measured experimental data were further described with ePC-SAFT, for which ion-specific ePC-SAFT parameters were used to describe the salts and the IL. A single binary parameter between K+ and the IL-ions was fitted to solubility data of the IL in K3PO4 aqueous solutions. Further, this binary parameter was applied to predict the influence of potassium-based salts on the solubility of the IL, and a good prediction was found. ePC-SAFT was even shown to be able to predict the salting-in induced by e.g., K2HPO4. This is a remarkable result as the binary parameter between K+/IL-ions was fitted to solubility data in K3PO4 solution, which only induces the IL salting-out.

Finally, ePC-SAFT was applied to fully predict the influence of sodium- and chloride-based salts on the IL solubility in aqueous media. A good accuracy was found when compared with the experimental data taken from literature. Remarkably, both salting-in/-out effects were predicted.

In contrast to ePC-SAFT, semi-empirical approaches require a much higher number of binary parameters in order to correlate the behaviour of complex systems, such as IL–salt–water systems. This work shows that the solubility behaviour of ILs in aqueous solutions could be captured with ePC-SAFT in a predictive way, using only pure-compound parameters and ion-specific binary interaction parameters that are universally valid and independent of the ions in solution. To the best of our knowledge, such type of results has never previously been achieved using a thermodynamic model, while using a single equation of state.

Supplementary Material

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental solubility data in weight and molality units; ion speciation profile of ZnSO4 in aqueous solutions; ePC-SAFT parameters estimation for the citrate anion.

ESI

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the collaboration of Leila S. C. Rato and Michael Santos Silva for determining some of the experimental data. This work was developed in the scope of the project CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials (Ref. FCT UID/ CTM/50011/2013), financed by national funds through the FCT/ MEC and co-financed by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. Catarina M. S. S. Neves also acknowledges FCT for the postdoctoral grant SFRH/BPD/109057/2015. The research leading to reported results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 337753. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the IGF-project 17114N/1 of the DECHEMA e.V. that was funded by the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (grant no. 005-1009-0053) based on an enactment of the German Federal Parliament (BMWi). The project was supported within the program “Promoting the Industrial Collective Research (IGF)” with the help of the German Federation of Industrial Research Associations (AiF).

References

  • 1.Plechkova NV, Seddon KR. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:123–150. doi: 10.1039/b006677j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Freire MG, Cl´audio AFM, Arau´jo JMM, Coutinho JAP, Marrucho IM, Canongia Lopes JN, Rebelo LPN. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:4966–4995. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35151j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neves CMSS, Freire MG, Coutinho JAP. RSC Adv. 2012;2:10882–10890. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gutowski KE, Broker GA, Willauer HD, Huddleston JD, Swatloski RP, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:6632–6633. doi: 10.1021/ja0351802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Binnemans K, Jones PT, Blanpain B, Van Gerven T, Yang Y, Walton A, Buchert M. J Cleaner Prod. 2013;51:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Papaiconomou N, Vite G, Goujon N, Lévêque JM, Billard I. Green Chem. 2012;14:2050–2056. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Freire MG, Carvalho PJ, Silva AMS, Santos LMNBF, Rebelo LPN, Marrucho IM, Coutinho JAP. J Phys. 2009;113:202–211. doi: 10.1021/jp8080035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Freire MG, Neves CMSS, Silva AMS, Santos LMNBF, Marrucho IM, Rebelo LPN, Shan JK, Maginn EJ, Coutinho JAP. J Phys Chem. 2010;114:2004–2014. doi: 10.1021/jp9095634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tome LIN, Varanda FR, Freire MG, Marrucho IM, Coutinho JAP. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:2815–2825. doi: 10.1021/jp810141d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lovelock KRJ. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14:5071–5089. doi: 10.1039/c2cp23851a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Santos JH, e Silva FA, Ventura SPM, Coutinho JAP, de Souza RL, Soares CMF, Lima ÁS. Biotechnol Prog. 2015;31:70–77. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Silva FAe, Sintra T, Ventura SPM, Coutinho JAP. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;122:315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pereira JFB, Rebelo LPN, Rogers RD, Coutinho JAP, Freire MG. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15:19580–19583. doi: 10.1039/c3cp53701c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shahriari S, Neves CMSS, Freire MG, Coutinho JAP. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116:7252–7258. doi: 10.1021/jp300874u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.João KG, Tomé LC, Isik M, Mecerreyes D, Marrucho IM. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:27462–27472. doi: 10.1039/c5cp03521j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tomé LIN, Pereira JFB, Rogers RD, Freire MG, Gomes JRB, Coutinho JAP. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:2271–2274. doi: 10.1039/c3cp54047b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pereira JFB, Kurnia KA, Cojocaru OA, Gurau G, Rebelo LPN, Rogers RD, Freire MG, Coutinho JAP. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:5723–5731. doi: 10.1039/c3cp54907k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Merchuk JC, Andrews BA, Asenjo JA. J Chromatogr B: Biomed Sci Appl. 1998;711:285–293. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(97)00594-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zafarani-Moattar MT, Hamzehzadeh S. J Chem Eng Data. 2010;55:1598–1610. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zafarani-Moattar MT, Hamzehzadeh S. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2011;304:110–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zafarani-Moattar MT, Hamzehzadeh S. J Chem Eng Data. 2009;54:833–841. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li Z, Pei Y, Liu L, Wang J. J Chem Thermodyn. 2010;42:932–937. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pei Y, Wang J, Liu L, Wu K, Zhao Y. J Chem Eng Data. 2007;52:2026–2031. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang Y, Zhang S, Chen Y, Zhang J. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2007;257:173–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bancroft WD, Hubard SS. J Am Chem Soc. 1942;64:347–353. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu C, Han J, Hu S, Yan Y, Li Y. J Chem Eng Data. 2011;56:3577–3584. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Deive FJ, Rivas MA, Rodríguez A. J Chem Thermodyn. 2011;43:1153–1158. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Han J, Wang Y, Li Y, Yu C, Yan Y. J Chem Eng Data. 2011;56:3679–3687. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen Y, Zhang S. J Chem Eng Data. 2010;55:278–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen Y, Meng Y, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Liu X, Yang J. J Chem Eng Data. 2010;55:3612–3616. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Othmer D, Tobias P. Ind Eng Chem. 1942;34:693–696. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Valderrama JO. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42:1603–1618. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kontogeorgis GM, Folas GK. Thermodynamic Models for Industrial Applications: From Classical and Advanced Mixing Rules to Association Theories. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester, UK: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang Y, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Zeng S, Dong H, Zhang S. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:26918–26929. doi: 10.1039/c5cp03446a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Held C, Reschke T, Mohammad S, Luza A, Sadowski G. Chem Eng Res Des. 2014;92:2884–2897. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Held C, Reschke T, Müller R, Kunz W, Sadowski G. J Chem Thermodyn. 2014;68:1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Held C, Prinz A, Wallmeyer V, Sadowski G. Chem Eng Sci. 2012;68:328–339. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Held C, Sadowski G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2009;279:141–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Held C, Cameretti LF, Sadowski G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2008;270:87–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kroon MC, Karakatsani EK, Economou IG, Witkampand G-J, Peters CJ. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:9262–9269. doi: 10.1021/jp060300o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Andreu JS, Vega LF. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:16028–16034. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ji X, Adidharma H. Chem Eng Sci. 2009;64:1985–1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nann A, Held C, Sadowski G. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52:18472–18481. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nann A, Mündges J, Held C, Verevkin SP, Sadowski G. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:3173–3185. doi: 10.1021/jp307276y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Passos H, Khan I, Mutelet F, Oliveira MB, Carvalho PJ, Santos LMNBF, Held C, Sadowski G, Freire MG, Coutinho JAP. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:3737–3748. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rodríguez-Palmeiro I, Rodríguez O, Soto A, Held C. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:1800–1810. doi: 10.1039/c4cp04336g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ji X, Held C, Sadowski G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2012;335:64–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ji X, Held C, Sadowski G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2014;363:59–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Klamt A. J Phys Chem. 1995;99:2224–2235. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Klamt A. COSMO-RS from quantum chemistry to fluid phasethermodynamics and drug design. Elsevier: Amsterdam, Boston; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Klamt A, Schuurmann G. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 1993;2:799–805. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Freire MG, Santos LMNBF, Marrucho IM, Coutinho JAP. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2007;255:167–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Freire MG, Ventura SPM, Santos LMNBF, Marrucho IM, Coutinho JAP. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2008;268:74–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ferreira AR, Freire MG, Ribeiro JC, Lopes FM, Crespo JG, Coutinho JAP. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:3483–3507. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Freire MG, Neves CMSS, Shimizu K, Bernardes CES, Marrucho IM, Coutinho JAP, Canongia Lopes JN, Rebelo LPN. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:15925–15934. doi: 10.1021/jp1093788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gross J, Sadowski G. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40:1244–1260. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gross J, Sadowski G. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:5510–5515. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cameretti LF, Sadowski G, Mollerup JM. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:3355–3362. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Reschke T, Brandenbusch C, Sadowski G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2014;368:91–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cameretti LF, Sadowski G. Chem Eng Process. 2008;47:1018–1025. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fuchs D, Fischer J, Tumakaka F, Sadowski G. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45:6578–6584. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Voet D, Voet JG, Pratt CW. Fundamentals of Biochemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; New York: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hofmeister F. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1888;24:247–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kurnia KA, Freire MG, Coutinho JAP. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:297–308. doi: 10.1021/jp411933a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Reschke T, Brandenbusch C, Sadowski G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2014;375:306–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang C, Lei YD, Endo S, Wania F. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:13238–13245. doi: 10.1021/es5035602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES